Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

D Hartmann

Publications and source records attributed to D Hartmann.

224 records · Page 13Linked to original sources
PubMedDate not supplied

The interaction of the lipase inhibitor orlistat with ethanol in healthy volunteers.

OBJECTIVES: The primary objective was to investigate the possible interference of ethanol on the orlistat effect on inhibition of dietary fat absorption and the possible interference of orlistat on the pharmacokinetics of ethanol. Secondary objectives were to assess the tolerability during concomitant dosing of orlistat and ethanol and to determine the ethanol effect on plasma levels of orlistat. METHODS: This was a double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel, randomized study performed in 30 (three parallel groups of ten subjects each) healthy normal weight male subjects between the ages of 20 and 30 years. A 5-day run-in period to accustom subjects to a standardized diet of 2500 kcal/day (30% fat) and to establish baseline fecal fat excretion was followed by a 6-day treatment period. Subjects were randomly assigned to one of three treatment groups (A = orlistat 120 mg t.i.d. and ethanol placebo, B = orlistat 120 mg t.i.d. and 40 g ethanol qd on days -1 and 6, and 40 g bid on days 1-5, and C = orlistat placebo tid and 40 g ethanol qd on days -1 and 6, and 40 g b.i.d. on days 1 5). Serial blood samples were collected for determination of ethanol serum concentrations at specified times over 5 h after each dose of ethanol on days -1 and 6, and for determination of orlistat plasma concentrations on days 1, 3, 5, and 6. Feces were collected quantitatively on days -5 through 8 for analysis of fecal fat. RESULTS: The means of baseline-corrected fecal fat excretion values were comparable: 23.7 g for group A (orlistat) and 22.7 g for group B (orlistat and ethanol). No significant difference was found regarding ethanol pharmacokinetic parameters between treatments with orlistat and placebo. No apparent differences existed between the number of plasma samples with measurable orlistat concentrations in groups A and B. CONCLUSION: Concomitant ingestion of social amounts of ethanol did not alter the inhibitory effect of orlistat on dietary fat absorption during short-term treatment (6 days) with orlistat. Short-term treatment with orlistat had no significant influence on ethanol pharmacokinetics.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Vitamin A teratogenicity and risk assessment in the macaque retinoid model.

Studies were performed in the cynomolgus monkey (Macaca fascicularis) to provide risk assessment information on safe dose levels of Vitamin A during human pregnancy. Vitamin A palmitate was orally administered at 7500 IU/kg (2.25 mg/kg) to 80 000 IU/kg (24 mg/kg) body weight during early pregnancy (gestation day [GD] 16-27). The results indicated a dose-related increase in exposure (AUC) to retinyl esters and retinoic acids (RA) (all-trans-RA, all-trans-4-oxo-RA, 13-cis-RA, 13-cis-4-oxo-RA). There was also a dose-related increase in abortion and malformation that affected typical retinoid target tissues in the embryo, including the craniofacial region, heart, and thymus. The NOAEL and LOAEL for structural malformations were 7500 IU/kg and 20 000 IU/kg (6 mg/kg), respectively. A companion study involving oral administration of 13-cis-RA during the same gestational period established the NOAEL for malformations at 0.5 mg/kg/day, which is close to the human therapeutic dose range (0.5 to 1.5 mg/kg/day) associated with retinoid embryopathy. Based on the known similarities in teratogenic susceptibility to 13-cis-RA, the monkey NOAEL for Vitamin A (7500 IU/kg) was used to estimate safe levels of this nutrient in humans applying a safety factor of 10. This approach yielded safe levels of Vitamin A during human pregnancy in the range of approximately 25 000 to 37 000 IU/day.

Abnormalities, Drug-Induced↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Influence of dietary composition on the inhibition of fat absorption by orlistat.

Orlistat, a potent and selective inhibitor of gastrointestinal lipases, is designed for the treatment of obesity. The effect of orlistat on dietary fat absorption, when it was administered with diets differing in fibre content (high and low) and accessibility of fat (intra- and extracellular fat), was investigated in 32 hospitalized healthy males, according to an open, two-factorial study design. The subjects were randomly allocated to one of four parallel groups of equal size: A = intracellular fat, high fibre (28 g/day); B = extracellular fat, high fibre; C = extracellular fat, low fibre (9 g/day); or D = intracellular fat, low fibre. After a 5-day run-in period to accustom the volunteers to the standardized diet (2500 kcal and 84 g fat per day) and to establish baseline faecal fat parameters, they received 80 mg orlistat, three times daily mid-way through each meal for 8 days. Faeces were collected to measure total fat and free fatty acid excretions. The mean baseline-corrected excretion (% of dietary fat) in groups A, B, C and D, respectively, was 37.0, 30.4, 30.3 and 34.5 for total fat, and 6.5, 4.3, 2.6 and 3.9 for free fatty acids. The 95% confidence intervals for the difference between the means for high fibre and low fibre groups and for intracellular fat and extracellular fat groups, respectively, were 1.4 +/- 4.9 and 5.5 +/- 4.9 for total fat, and 2.2 +/- 3.1 and 1.9 +/- 3.1 for free fatty acids. The statistically significant difference (P < 0.05) in total faecal fat between intracellular fat and extracellular fat groups, in absolute terms < 5 g fat/day, was not regarded as clinically relevant. Under the conditions of this study, dietary fibre content and accessibility of fat had no relevant effect on the inhibition of fat absorption by orlistat.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Study of the dependence of human monocytes and macrophages antitumoral properties upon TNF-alpha expression or release.

This study compares the antitumoral properties of isolated circulating human blood monocytes (Mo) and of mature macrophages (MO) obtained by 7 days differentiation of Mo or isolated from alveolar washing. These cells were activated to cytotoxicity in the presence of recombinant human interferon-gamma (rHuIFN-gamma). This antitumoral effect was measured at a low (1/1) effector/target ratio without pretreatment of the tumor cells. Activated Mo released tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) in the culture medium where their antitumoral activity could be totally neutralized by specific anti-rHuTNF-alpha antibodies. In contrast, blood monocytes derived macrophages differentiated and activated in vitro expressed TNF-alpha on their membrane where it could be labelled and partially neutralized by anti-rHuTNF-alpha antibodies. Direct effector/target contact was required for the activity of macrophages differentiated in culture or collected from the lung cavity of healthy subjects. When these macrophages were obtained from infected patients or subjected to LPS treatment, they directly released cytotoxic amounts of TNF in the extracellular fluid after activation with IFN-gamma. Monocytes act mainly by soluble mediators (TNF-alpha being a key factor), while differentiated macrophages in the absence of endotoxin act by close cell to cell contact involving the lytic action of membranous TNF-alpha as well as some release of soluble TNF-alpha. We also present evidences (based on the use of various protease inhibitors) that the role of proteases is much less crucial in the cytotoxic action of monocytes and macrophages.

Cytotoxicity, Immunologic↗