Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

C Di Mario

Publications and source records attributed to C Di Mario.

At least 91 records · Page 5Linked to original sources
PubMed1998

Angiographic and clinical outcome following coronary stenting of small vessels: a comparison with coronary stenting of large vessels.

OBJECTIVES: Stent implantation reduces restenosis in vessels > or =3 mm compared with balloon angioplasty, but few data are available for stents implanted in vessels <3 mm. The aim of this study was to evaluate immediate and follow-up patient outcomes after stent implantation in vessels <3 mm compared to stent implantation in vessels > or =3 mm. METHODS: Between March 1993 and May 1996, a total of 1,298 consecutive patients (1,673 lesions) underwent coronary stenting. The study population was divided into two groups based on angiographic vessel diameter. In case of multivessel stenting, patients were randomly assigned only one lesion. Group I included 696 patients (696 lesions) in whom stents were implanted in vessels > or =3 mm, and group II included 602 patients (602 lesions) in whom stents were implanted in vessels <3 mm. RESULTS: There was no difference in procedural success (95.4% in group I and 95.9% in group II), or subsequent subacute stent thrombosis (1.5% in group I and 1.4% in group II, p=NS). The postprocedure residual diameter stenosis was 3.31+/-12.4% in group I and -2.45+/-16.2% in group II. Angiographic follow-up was performed in 75% of patients, restenosis occurred in 19.9% of patients in group I and 32.6% in group II (p <0.0001). Absolute lumen gain was significantly higher in group I compared to group II, but absolute late lumen loss was similar in the two groups (1.05+/-0.91 mm in group I vs. 1.11+/-0.85 mm in group II, p=NS). Subsequently, the loss index was more favorable in group I (0.45 vs. 0.56; p=0.0006). Independent predictors of freedom from restenosis by multivariate logistic regression in the total population were: larger baseline reference diameter (odds ratio 2.032 p=0.006), larger postprocedure minimal stent cross-sectional area (odds ratio 1.190, p=0.0001) and shorter lesions (odds ratio 1.037, p=0.01). At long-term clinical follow-up, patients with small vessels had a lower rate of event-free survival (63% vs. 71.3%, p=0.007). CONCLUSIONS: Coronary stenting can be performed in small vessels with a high success rate and low incidence of stent thrombosis. However, the long-term angiographic and clinical outcome of patients undergoing stent implantation in small vessels is less favorable than that of patients with large vessels.

Aged↗
PubMed1998

Stenting after optimal lesion debulking (sold) registry. Angiographic and clinical outcome.

BACKGROUND: Coronary stenting has reduced restenosis in focal de novo lesions, but its impact has been less pronounced in complex lesion subsets. Preliminary data suggest a role for plaque burden in promoting intimal hyperplasia after stent implantation. The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that plaque removal with directional atherectomy before stent implantation may lower the intensity of late neointimal hyperplasia, reducing the incidence of in-stent restenosis. METHODS AND RESULTS: Seventy-one patients with 90 lesions underwent directional atherectomy before coronary stenting. Intravascular ultrasound-guided stenting was performed in 73 lesions (81%). Clinical success was achieved in 96% of patients. Procedural complications were as follows: emergency bypass surgery in 1 patient (1.4%), who died 2 weeks later; Q-wave myocardial infarction in 2 patients (2.8%); and non-Q-wave myocardial infarction in 8 patients (11.3%). None of the patients had stent thrombosis at follow-up. Angiographic follow-up was performed in 89% of eligible patients at 5.7+/-1.7 months. Loss index was 0.33 (95% CI, 0.26 to 0.40), and angiographic restenosis was 11% (95% CI, 5% to 20%). Clinical follow-up was performed in all patients at 18+/-3 months. Target lesion revascularization was 7% (95% CI, 3% to 14%). CONCLUSIONS: Directional atherectomy followed by coronary stenting could be performed with good clinical success rate. Also, these data point to a possible reduction in angiographic restenosis and a significant reduction in the need for repeated coronary interventions. Therefore, a randomized clinical trial seems appropriate to test the validity of this approach.

Aged↗
PubMed1998

Comparison of aggressive versus nonaggressive balloon dilatation for stent deployment on late loss and restenosis in native coronary arteries.

Aggressive balloon dilatation is currently performed to assure full stent expansion and minimize the risk of stent thrombosis. It is not known if aggressive stent expansion leads to further increases in intimal proliferation and restenosis. A retrospective analysis was performed of 688 consecutive coronary narrowings in which stents were implanted. Angiographic follow-up was performed and quantitative coronary angiographic measurements were obtained using electronic calipers. Patients were divided into 2 groups. Group A (212 narrowings) had stents implanted before 1993, before the routine use of aggressive stent expansion techniques. Group B (476 narrowings) had stents implanted after 1993, when oversized balloons or high-pressure inflations were performed inside stents. Comparisons were made between angiographic changes and clinical outcomes between the 2 groups. Group B lesions had less favorable characteristics due to longer lengths of lesions. Despite this there was less angiographic and clinical restenosis in this cohort. There was no difference in late loss between the 2 groups. Thus, aggressive stent implantation techniques were not associated with increased late loss or restenosis.

Aged↗
PubMed1998

Comparison of angiographic and clinical outcomes of coronary stenting of chronic total occlusions versus subtotal occlusions.

The objective of this study was to assess the short- and long-term outcome of patients undergoing coronary stenting for chronic total occlusions compared with a control patient population with nonocclusive stenoses. A total of 789 consecutive patients (1,043 lesions) underwent coronary stenting using a high-pressure stent optimization technique. The study population was divided into total occlusion group (94 consecutive patients [95 lesions] with chronic total occlusions) and subtotal occlusion group (695 consecutive patients [948 lesions] with nonocclusive stenoses). There was no difference in post-procedure angiographic minimum lumen diameter (3.13 +/- 0.48 vs 3.15 +/- 0.57 mm, p = 0.72) and minimum intrastent cross-sectional area by intravascular ultrasound (7.31 +/- 2.06 vs 7.64 +/- 2.53 mm2, p = 0.26) between the total and subtotal groups, respectively. Subacute thrombosis occurred in 2 patients (2.1%) in the total group compared with 9 patients (1.3%) in the subtotal group (p = 0.63). Angiographic restenosis occurred in 27% vs 22% (p = 0.40) and repeat angioplasty in 15% vs 13% (p = 0.62) in the total and subtotal groups, respectively. Thus, coronary stenting of chronic total occlusions after successful recanalization could be performed with a high success rate. In addition, the incidence of stent thrombosis, angiographic restenosis, and the need for target lesion revascularization is comparable to that of an unselected cohort of patients with nonocclusive stenoses.

Aged↗
PubMed1998

Focal stent collapse in a patient with systemic sclerosis.

We report a patient with systemic sclerosis having implantation of a 35 mm beStent with immediate success but developing angina at follow-up. A focal stent collapse with focal hyperplasia in and outside the stent was documented by ultrasound after 2 mos. A 14mm Palmaz-Schatz stent was successfully deployed into the collapsed beStent, with good 6-mo angiographic result. The stent collapse was probably due to unequal distribution of radial forces and possibly reactive hyperplasia in this unique patient with systemic sclerosis.

Aged↗
PubMed1998

Low restenosis rate in lesions of the left anterior descending coronary artery with stenting following directional coronary atherectomy.

The present study evaluated acute and late results with stenting following directional coronary atherectomy (DCA) for the lesions in the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD). Between April 1995 and January 1997, 200 LAD lesions with > or =3 mm reference vessel diameter were treated with coronary stents. The lesions were divided as to whether or not DCA was performed before stenting; 1) stenting alone (n = 163) and 2) debulking and stenting (n = 37). There were no significant differences in the incidences of complications except for non-Q-wave myocardial infarction that was more frequent in patients with debulking and stenting than in those with stenting alone (13.5% vs. 2.4%, P < 0.05). A greater acute lumen gain (2.85 +/- 0.66 vs. 2.25+/-0.60 mm, P < 0.01) and minimal lumen diameter (3.64+/-0.56 vs. 3.15+/-0.41 mm, P < 0.01) after stenting were observed in patients with debulking and stenting than in those with stenting alone. At follow-up patients with debulking and stenting continued to have a greater minimal lumen diameter (2.88+/-0.72 vs. 2.15+/-0.85 mm, P < 0.01) and had a lower restenosis rate (6.3% vs. 23.1%, P < 0.05) than those with stenting alone. Stenting following DCA appears to be advantageous in the LAD lesions with > or =3 mm reference vessel diameter.

Aged↗
PubMed1998

Mechanical recanalization of total coronary occlusions with the use of a new guide wire.

The mechanical approach in the recanalization of total coronary occlusions consisted of the use of a new 0.014-inch standard coronary guide wire with jointless spring coil design that improves steering characteristics and tip stiffness. In addition, a 0.014-inch soft tip wire with hydrophilic coating and low-profile 1.5 mm over-the-wire balloons were used. The first wire was used selectively in 86 patients to treat 95 total occlusions, of which 51 (54%) were older than 3 months. Unfavorable angiographic characteristics were present in 79 (83%) of 95 lesions. Overall crossing success was 71% (67 of 95 lesions). Complications were one coronary perforation with cardiac tamponade necessitating emergency bypass surgery. In conclusion, the mechanical approach with the use of the standard coronary guide wire with jointless spring coil design provides a high success rate in the recanalization of unfavorable total occlusions.

Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary↗
PubMed1998

Coronary artery stenting in the elderly: short-term outcome and long-term angiographic and clinical follow-up.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to compare the short- and long-term outcomes of elderly patients undergoing coronary artery stenting with those of younger patients and to determine the long-term clinical outcome and survival of elderly patients post stent implantation. BACKGROUND: Elderly patients undergoing coronary revascularization are considered a high-risk group. Few data exist that relate the results of stenting in treating coronary artery disease in the elderly population. METHODS: All elderly patients >75 years of age who underwent coronary artery stenting between March 1993 and July 1997 (n=137) at our center were compared to the patients <75 who underwent coronary artery stenting during the same time period (n=2,551). Long-term clinical follow-up and survival were determined for the elderly group. RESULTS: Elderly patients presented with lower ejection fractions (54% vs. 58%, p=0.0001), more unstable angina (47% vs. 28%, p=0.0001), and more multivessel disease (78% vs. 62%, p= 0.0001) than younger patients. These older patients had higher rates of procedure related complications including procedural myocardial infarction (MI) (2.9% vs. 1.7%, p=0.2), emergency CABG (3.7% vs. 1.4%, p=0.04), and death (2.2% vs. 0.12%, p=0.0001). Angiographic follow-up, obtained in both groups, demonstrated significantly higher restenosis rates in the elderly versus younger patients (47% vs. 28%, p=0.0007). Longer term clinical follow-up, which was obtained only in the elderly group, showed that at a mean follow-up period of 12 months post coronary stenting, elderly survival free from death, MI, revascularization and angina was 54% and that their overall survival was 91%. Subanalysis of the elderly patients who died showed much higher incidence of combined unstable angina (80%), prior MI (60%), lower ejection fraction (46%), multivessel disease (100%) and complex lesions (100%) than the overall group. CONCLUSIONS: Elderly patients who undergo coronary artery stenting have significantly higher rates of procedural complications and worse six month outcomes than younger patients, especially those who present with combined unstable angina, history of MI, EF < 50%, multivessel disease and complex lesions. Overall survival in the elderly population at 12 months postcoronary artery stenting was 91% and event-free survival was 54%.

Aged↗
PubMed1998

Plaque removal prior to stent implantation in native coronary arteries: why? When? And how?

Coronary stenting has significantly reduced restenosis in focal de novo coronary lesions, but its impact in complex lesions has been less pronounced. Recent data suggest a possible role for pre-intervention plaque burden in exacerbating neo-intimal hyperplasia after stent implantation. These observations formed the basis for the hypothesis that plaque removal prior to stent implantation, using directional atherectomy in non-calcified lesions and rotational atherectomy in calcified lesions, may reduce restenosis. The currently available non-randomized experience that used this approach has shown its feasibility and favourable long-term outcome when applied in selected patients. However, the incidence of non-Q-wave myocardial infarction is increased with both rotational and directional atherectomy compared to PTCA or stent alone. The utilization of potent antiplatelet agents and/or the development of new atherectomy devices that produce lower embolization rate may decrease the incidence of these ischaemic complications. In addition, considering the increased procedural time and cost, this approach will have to be applied in selected patient subsets where debulking or stenting as a stand-alone strategy is associated with a high restenosis rate. Randomized clinical trials testing the usefulness of this approach, with both rotational and directional atherectomy, are currently in progress.

Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary↗
PubMed1998

Bifurcational stenting.

Treatment of bifurcation lesions is a complex issue, and there is no single panacea to the variety of lesions that form this cohort. The contribution of side-branch compromise to the adverse clinical events occurring after stent implantation need not be stressed and requires an aggressive approach including balloon dilatation before and after stent deployment. Various new techniques of kissing stent placement, such as the 'T', 'V', 'Y', and the culottes technique, have been proposed in recent years to treat different anatomical situations. The angle formed by the side-branches, the severity of involvement of the ostia and the vessel size are the main factors which influence selection of the strategy. Newer generations of stents, such as the bifurcate stents, tailor-made for bifurcation lesions, are evolving, and are expected to make a positive impact on the procedural outcomes and long-term results after bifurcation stenting. The development of new strategies and stent designs has greatly improved safety and immediate outcome of bifurcational stenting, but the procedural success still needs to be matched by an equal improvement in long-term patency.

Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary↗
PubMed1998

Alcoholization of the interventricular septum (Sigwart procedure) for treatment of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

A patient with NYHA Class III dyspnea under medical treatment for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy underwent alcoholization of the first septal perforator. The procedure induced complete disappearance of the intraventricular gradient, with development of a Q-wave anterior myocardial infarction (peak CK rise = 1645 IU) and a complete right bundle branch block. After 5 months the patient maintains a marked improvement in functional capacity (NYHA Class I).

Cardiac Catheterization↗
PubMed1997

Long-term angiographic and clinical outcome of patients undergoing multivessel coronary stenting.

BACKGROUND: Randomized clinical trials have shown that multivessel coronary angioplasty is feasible and provides similar long-term survival as bypass surgery in selected patients. However, the higher need for repeat intervention, in particular, coronary artery bypass graft surgery, remains a problem. The objective of this study was to test the hypothesis that multivessel stenting is safe and effective in reducing the need for repeat interventions, in particular, the need for bypass surgery. METHODS AND RESULTS: Between March 1993 and June 1995, 100 consecutive patients (243 lesions) had multivessel coronary stenting. High-pressure stent optimization was used in all patients. Procedural success was achieved in 97% of lesions; 2 patients (2%) required emergency bypass surgery. Angiographic follow-up was obtained in 89% of patients at 5.2+/-2.5 months. Angiographic restenosis occurred in 22% of the lesions, but 37% of patients had > or = 1 lesion with restenosis. Clinical follow-up was obtained in all patients at 21 +/- 10 months: target lesion revascularization was needed in 30 patients (30%), repeat angioplasty in 28 patients (28%) and coronary bypass surgery in 2 patients (2%); the overall survival rate was 96% (2% noncardiac death). CONCLUSIONS: Multivessel coronary stenting can be performed with high success rate and low need for emergency bypass surgery. Compared with historical results with multivessel percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, patients who undergo multivessel stenting need less repeat interventions, in particular, less coronary bypass surgery and have similar long-term survival.

Aged↗
PubMed1997

Comparison of immediate and intermediate-term results of intravascular ultrasound versus angiography-guided Palmaz-Schatz stent implantation in matched lesions.

BACKGROUND: Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) provides more precise information than angiography about vascular dimensions. This information is used by some centers to optimize intracoronary stent implantation. There are no direct comparisons of the effects on restenosis of optimal IVUS-guided versus angiography-directed high-pressure stenting. METHODS AND RESULTS: Lesions of patients who had a 6-month angiographic follow-up study were eligible for matching. From 445 consecutive lesions treated by Palmaz-Schatz (P-S) stenting guided by IVUS (IVUS group) in Milan, 173 lesions were individually matched with 173 of 476 consecutive lesions treated by P-S stenting directed by angiography (Angio group) in Hamburg. Lesions were selected by a computerized program according to baseline clinical, angiographic, and procedural variables. Immediate and 6-month angiographic results were retrospectively compared, distinguishing an "early phase" from a "late phase." This distinction was based on the more aggressive dilation strategy with larger balloons and more demanding IVUS criteria for optimal stent expansion used in Milan in the early phase. In both phases, a larger minimum lumen diameter (MLD) immediately after stenting and after 6 months was achieved in the IVUS group than in the Angio group. In the early phase, the dichotomous restenosis rate was lower in the IVUS group than in the Angio group (9.2% versus 22.3%; P=.04). In the late phase, there was no difference in restenosis between the groups (22.7% versus 23.7%; P=1.0). CONCLUSIONS: In matched lesions treated with high-pressure stenting, IVUS guidance achieved a larger MLD than angiographic guidance. However, in the IVUS group, the restenosis rate was lower only in the early phase, when balloons larger than currently used were selected to maximize the stent lumen area.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Comparison of coronary luminal quantification obtained from intracoronary ultrasound and both geometric and videodensitometric quantitative angiography before and after balloon angioplasty and directional atherectomy.

BACKGROUND: Debate exists regarding the relationship between angiographic and intracoronary ultrasound (ICUS) measurements of minimal luminal cross-sectional area after coronary intervention. We investigated this and the factors that may influence it by using ICUS and quantitative angiography. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients who underwent successful balloon angioplasty (n=100) or directional atherectomy (n=50) were examined by using ICUS and quantitative angiography (edge-detection [ED] and videodensitometry [VID]) before and after intervention. Luminal damage postintervention was qualitatively graded into three categories based on angiographic results (smooth lumen, haziness, or dissection). Correlation of minimal luminal cross-sectional area measurements by ICUS and ED was .59 before and .47 after balloon angioplasty. Correlation between ICUS and VID was .50 before and .63 after balloon angioplasty. Postintervention, the difference between ICUS and VID was less than the difference between ICUS and ED (P<.01). Additionally, the correlation was .74 between ICUS and ED measurements and .78 between ICUS and VID measurements in the smooth lumen group, .46 and .63, respectively, in the presence of haziness, and .26 and .46, respectively, in lesions with dissection. Similar results were obtained after directional atherectomy: the agreement between ICUS and quantitative angiography deteriorated according to the degree of vessel damage, but less so with VID than ED. CONCLUSIONS: Complex morphological changes induced by intervention may contribute to discordance between the two quantitative imaging techniques. In the absence of ICUS, VID may be a complementary technique to ED in lesions with complex morphology after balloon angioplasty and directional atherectomy.

Aged↗
PubMed1997

Coronary stenting after rotational atherectomy in calcified and complex lesions. Angiographic and clinical follow-up results.

BACKGROUND: Treatment of calcified (in contrast to simple) lesions with PTCA has been associated with a lower success rate and more procedural complications. Rotablation can improve acute results, but the high restenosis rate remains a problem. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical and angiographic outcome of patients with complex and calcified lesions treated with a combination of rotablation and stenting. METHODS AND RESULTS: Seventy-five consecutive patients with 106 lesions had rotablation prior to coronary stenting. Intravascular ultrasound-guided stenting was used without subsequent anticoagulation in 93% of patients. Procedural success was achieved in 93.4% of lesions. Acute stent thrombosis occurred in two lesions (1.9%), and subacute stent thrombosis in one lesion (0.9%). Angiographic follow-up was performed in 82.5% of lesions at 4.6 +/- 1.9 months with an angiographic restenosis rate of 22.5%. Clinical follow-up was performed in all patients at 6.4 +/- 3 months; target lesion revascularization was needed in 18% of lesions; Q-wave myocardial infarction occurred in 1.3%, coronary bypass surgery in 4.0%, and death in 1.3%. CONCLUSIONS: Optimal coronary stenting after rotablation in calcified and complex lesions can be performed with a high success rate, an acceptable rate of procedural complications, and a low rate of stent thrombosis. This approach was associated with a low incidence of angiographic restenosis compared with results usually obtained with other interventional strategies in calcified and complex lesion subsets.

Aged↗
PubMed1997

Prediction of restenosis after coronary balloon angioplasty. Results of PICTURE (Post-IntraCoronary Treatment Ultrasound Result Evaluation), a prospective multicenter intracoronary ultrasound imaging study.

BACKGROUND: Intracoronary ultrasound (ICUS) imaging is potentially suitable to identify lesions at high risk of restenosis after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA), but it has not been studied systematically. METHODS AND RESULTS: We recruited 200 patients in whom ICUS studies were performed after successful PTCA and related their ICUS parameters to 6-month follow-up quantitative coronary angiography. This was performed in 164 patients (82%), yielding 170 lesions for analysis. The overall incidence of a > or = 50% diameter stenosis at follow-up (categorical restenosis) was 29.4%. Quantitative ICUS parameters were weakly but significantly related to follow-up minimal luminal diameter on quantitative coronary angiography (lumen area: R2 = .36, P = .0001; vessel area: R2 = .29, P = .0002; plaque area: R2 = -.18, P = .021; percent obstruction: R2 = -.15, P = .05), but categorical restenosis was not significantly related to these parameters (P = .63, .77, .38, and .08, respectively). There were no significant predictors of restenosis in ICUS parameters of plaque morphology: eccentric versus concentric (P = 1.0), plaque type (hard, soft, or calcific, P = .98), or the number of calcified quadrants (P = .41). There were no significant predictors of restenosis in two predefined types of vessel-wall disruptions: (1) rupture: presence (P = .79), depth (partial versus complete, P = .85), or extent in quadrants (P = .6), and (2) dissection: presence (P = .31), depth (P = .82), or extent (P = .38). CONCLUSIONS: Qualitative ICUS parameters after PTCA did not predict restenosis. A larger lumen and vessel area and a smaller plaque area by ICUS were associated with a larger angiographic minimal lumen diameter at follow-up, but these parameters were not significantly related to categorical restenosis.

Aged↗
PubMed1997

New approach to quantitative angiographic assessment after stent implantation.

The new generation quantitative angiographic systems apply the interpolated technique to calculate the reference diameter at the site of the stenosis by integrating measurements of the segments proximal and distal to the stenosis. After stent implantation these measurements can be misleading as the treated segment, which is frequently larger than the adjacent not stented segments, is included in the measurements. The consequence is an overestimation of the reference diameter and the residual diameter stenosis. The present study was performed to compare this conventional technique of measurement with a new method which excludes the stented segment for the calculation of the reference diameter. Fifty-two lesions treated with poorly radiopaque stents (56% Palmaz-Schatz, 28% NIR, 10% Gianturco-Roubin, 6% Wallstent) expanded at high pressure (> = or 16 atm) were analyzed according to the conventional and stent excluded method. After stent implantation the reference diameter was 3.39 +/- 0.48 mm with conventional measurements and 3.02 +/- 0.45 mm with the stent excluded method (P < 0.05). The corresponding % diameter stenosis was 13 +/- 9 for the conventional technique and 1 +/- 13 for the stent excluded analysis (P < 0.05). The new approach to quantitative coronary analysis after stenting provides higher accuracy in reference diameter calculations and allows a more appropriate matching of stented segments with adjacent normal segments.

Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary↗