[Incidence of ascariasis and lambliasis in children with allergic diseases of the respiratory system].
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Biomedical subjects
Publications and source records attributed to B Mazur.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The importance of accurate, reliable recording mediums cannot be understated. Function and esthetics are directly related to this critical step. Dental recording materials must be accurate, easily manipulated, and economical for effective use. Five types of intraoral records of 31 patients were registered and placed on an arcon, semiadjustable articulator to measure the magnitude and direction of distortion. The results were the following. Polyether interocclusal recording medium without a carrier was the most accurate. Polyether and zinc oxide-eugenol pastes with carriers were the next most accurate recording mediums, but they required a disciplined technique. Recording waxes were consistently unreliable. Distortion occurred more frequently in a vertical direction, followed by an anteroposterior direction.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Two filamentous phage gene products are required for the replication of phage DNA. One of these, the gene II protein, is a site-specific endonuclease required for all phage-specific DNA synthesis. The other, the gene V protein, is a single-stranded DNA-binding protein required only for single-strand synthesis. Purified gene V protein, when added to an in vitro protein synthesizing system programmed by f1 DNA, specifically inhibits the synthesis of gene II protein. Inhibition seems to be translational, since synthesis of gene II protein from an RNA template is also inhibited by gene V protein. Gene V protein control of gene II expression can account for the regulation of the level of expression of the filamentous phage genome.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Five elastomeric impression materials were evaluated: two polysulfides (one lead-cure and one non-lead cure), two silicones (one condensation polymerization and one addition polymerization), and one polyether. These materials were subjected to simulated clinical conditions. Two techniques were evaluated. All materials were evaluated initially with use of a custom tray and manufacturers' adhesive. A second evaluation was performed without using the tray system. Both techniques were subjected to statistical comparison. Conclusions of the research were as follows: 1. All impression materials that were poured immediately and evaluated using a custom tray and adhesive consistently demonstrated superior results in comparison to those tested without the custom tray. 2. Polyether material consistently yielded superior results with or without a custom tray when compared to the other impression materials. The additional polymerization silicone ranked second, followed by the lead-cure polysulfide and the condensation polymerization silicone, respectively.
Four materials, zinc oxide-eugenol paste, eugenol-free-zinc oxide paste, a silicone, and polyether jaw relations registration material were studied in a controlled laboratory environment to determine their accuracy and stability in intervals over a 1-week period. The results are as follows: 1. The eugenol-free zinc-oxide paste was the only material which exhibited no statistically significant difference between the die scribes and those of the sample. 2. The setting reaction of the eugenol-free-zinc oxide paste was a saponification reaction, resulting in the production of an insoluble soap. 3. With polyether, silicone, and zinc oxide-eugenol paste, there was a statistical difference between the die and the respective samples at the immediate reading and throughout the experiment. Polyether showed the least difference, and zinc oxide-eugenol paste the greatest.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.