Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

B Fisher

Publications and source records attributed to B Fisher.

At least 109 records · Page 6Linked to original sources
PubMed1996

Phase II study of docetaxel (taxotere) in patients with previously untreated extensive small cell lung cancer.

The objective of this multicenter phase II study was to evaluate the activity of docetaxel in previously untreated small cell lung cancer. Fourteen patients were treated at a dose of 75 mg/m2 intravenously every three weeks. Of the 12 patients evaluable for response, one had a partial response for a duration of 12 weeks for a response rate of 8.3%. Toxicity was mild. We conclude that docetaxel has, at the dose given in this study, little activity in previously untreated small cell lung cancer.

Aged↗
PubMed1996

Pre-radiation chemotherapy for malignant glioma in adults.

PURPOSE: To review our experience with pre-radiation chemotherapy for malignant glioma. METHODS: Consecutive adults with newly diagnosed glioblastoma, anaplastic astrocytoma, anaplastic oligodendroglioma and anaplastic mixed glioma with a Karnofsky Performance Score of 60 or greater were treated with one cycle of procarbazine, lomustine and vincristine or lomustine alone, prior to radiation. Computed tomographic scans were obtained soon after surgery, eight weeks later, after radiation, and at regular intervals thereafter. The effects of chemotherapy and subsequent radiation and durations of tumor control and survival were assessed in this single arm, single center, prospective trial. RESULTS: Thirty-seven patients started chemotherapy, 36 were rescanned eight weeks after diagnosis. Five patients (16%) responded to the first cycle of chemotherapy, three had glioblastoma and two anaplastic oligodendroglioma. Seven (19%) progressed during the first cycle, 6 had glioblastoma; with the addition of radiation one progressive case responded, three stabilized, and three continued to progress. Median times to progression and median durations of survival were 26 weeks and 60 weeks for the entire group, 24 weeks and 44 weeks for glioblastoma, and greater than 104 weeks for anaplastic astrocytoma. CONCLUSIONS: Most patients with glioblastoma do not respond to one cycle of nitrosourea-based chemotherapy given prior to radiation, but patients with anaplastic oligodendroglioma sometimes do. Patients with anaplastic astrocytoma may not respond to one cycle of chemotherapy, but often respond to subsequent radiation. Judging by survival results, radiation can be delayed eight weeks without appearing to compromise patient outcome. IMPLICATIONS: Pre-radiation chemotherapy with newer agents can be evaluated more fully in the future knowing that brief delays in radiation are unlikely to yield substantially inferior results.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

A phase I study of bi-weekly paclitaxel/cisplatin as initial therapy for advanced ovarian cancer. A study of the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group.

PURPOSE: Given the potential for improved outcomes, a phase I trial was initiated to develop a paclitaxel/cisplatin regimen that could be delivered every two weeks to women with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From 1992 to 1994, 29 (28 eligible) patients were enrolled in a dose-seeking trial. All received 60 mg/m2 of cisplatin preceded by paclitaxel infused over three hours. The paclitaxel dose was excalated from an initial level of 90 mg/m2 by 10 mg/m2 increments in successive cohorts of patients. RESULTS: At 120 mg/m2 of paclitaxel, the dose-limiting toxicity was granulocytopenia which prevented retreatment on time. The recommended dose level was therefore paclitaxel 110 mg/m2 infused over three hours with cisplatin 60 mg/m2, repeated bi-weekly for eight cycles. CONCLUSION: This bi-weekly schedule of paclitaxel/cisplatin provides no advantage in terms of dose-intensity nor total dose of paclitaxel in comparison to more common regimens given tri-weekly.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1996

Phase I study of paclitaxel (Taxol) and ifosfamide in previously untreated patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. A study of the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group.

BACKGROUND: Paclitaxel (Taxol) and ifosfamide are among the most active single agents for the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer. We undertook this phase I dose escalation study to determine the maximum tolerated doses of these drugs which could be administered without growth factors to untreated patients with tumours of this type. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer were treated with a 3-hour infusion of paclitaxel and a 1-hour infusion of ifosfamide every 3 weeks. Groups of 3 patients were entered at escalating dose levels in traditional phase I design. Starting doses were paclitaxel, 100 mg/m2, and ifosfamide 3 g/m2, and all patients received premedication with dexamethasone, diphenhydramine and a 5-HT3 blocker. Dose escalation occurred only after full toxicity assessment for 2 cycles for all patients in the dose level. RESULTS: Dose escalation of paclitaxel continued to 225 mg/m2 without dose-limiting toxicity, but further escalation was not attempted because of the known likelihood of neuro-toxicity above this level. Instead, ifosfamide was increased to 4 g/m2 for the final level. At these doses, dose-limiting myelosuppression was not seen, and there was only 1 episode of febrile neutropenia in 164 treatment cycles. Drug-related toxicities of ifosfamide included gross hematuria and confusion in 1 patient each, and paclitaxel-related symptoms included flu-like syndrome in most patients, mild to moderate arthralgia and/or myalgia in 8 and 25 patients, respectively, parasthesiae in 15 patients and mild to moderate hypersensitivity reactions in 15 patients each. Partial response was seen in 20.5% of patients (CI 9.3%-36.5%). SUMMARY: Out-patient paclitaxel given over 3 hours and single-dose ifosfamide over 1 hour may be combined safely without the need for hematopoietic growth factors for the treatment of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer. The recommended doses for phase II study are paclitaxel, 225 mg/m2 and ifosfamide, 4 g/m2 every 3 weeks.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

Phase II study of the progesterone antagonist mifepristone in patients with untreated metastatic breast carcinoma: a National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group study.

PURPOSE: Mifepristone (RU486) is a progesterone receptor (PgR) antagonist that has been shown to be active in some preclinical hormone-dependent breast cancer tumor models and to produce a few responses in patients with pretreated metastatic disease in two small trials. This trial was designed to assess the response rate and toxic effects of mifepristone in a favorable group of women with PgR-positive recurrent breast cancer who had received no prior therapy. METHODS: Postmenopausal patients with PgR-positive, bidimensionally measurable disease were eligible provided they had received no other therapy for recurrence. Prior adjuvant hormonal treatment was permitted if a disease-free interval of at least 24 months had been observed. Mifepristone 200 mg was given daily and disease was reassessed every 4 weeks. Standard criteria for tumor response and toxic effects were used. RESULTS: A total of 28 patients were registered in the trial: all were eligible and assessable. Three partial responses were noted for an overall response rate of 10.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 2% to 28%). Toxic effects were generally mild to moderate and consisted primarily of nausea, lethargy, anorexia, and hot flashes. CONCLUSION: Mifepristone had minimal activity in this optimal group of patients. While there may be reason to conduct some clinical studies with it in combination with antiestrogens on the basis of some preclinical work, our data do not support its use as a single agent in the management of breast cancer.

Aged↗
PubMed1996

Preirradiation chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and dexamethasone for primary CNS lymphomas: initial report of radiation therapy oncology group protocol 88-06.

PURPOSE: This study was a prospective phase I/II trial performed by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) to test the tolerance and efficacy of preirradiation cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and dexamethasone (CHOD) chemotherapy followed by large-volume, high-dose brain radiation therapy (RT) for patients with primary CNS lymphoma (PCNSL). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty-four (52 assessable) human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-negative patients with PCNSL were entered on study and received two (n = 20) or three (n = 32) cycles of CHOD (six patients with positive CSF cytology received intrathecal methotrexate in addition to CHOD). Whole-brain RT to 41.4 Gy and tumor boost to 18 Gy (total dose, 59.4 Gy) followed chemotherapy. RESULTS: As of July 1994, with a minimum potential follow-up time of 20 months, 12 of 52 assessable patients remain alive without evidence of progression. The median survival time for the entire group is 16.1 months, with a 2-year survival rate of 42%. By univariate analysis, patient age was found to be a significant prognostic factor with respect to survival (P = .005) in favor of age less than 60 years. Karnofsky performance status (KPS) was of borderline significance (P = .057). Survival for patients treated on RTOG 88-06 was compared with that of patients treated on RTOG 83-15, which tested RT alone. No difference in overall survival was found (P = .53). Grade 4 neutropenia developed in 29 of 51 patients during chemotherapy. There were two deaths during chemotherapy: one as a result of sepsis and one of a pulmonary embolus. The worst toxicity during RT was < or = grade 2 in 50 of 52 patients. CONCLUSION: Preirradiation CHOD chemotherapy does not significantly improve survival over RT alone for patients with PCNSL. Age remains a powerful prognostic factor independent of therapy and must be considered in testing alternative combined approaches.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗
PubMed1996

Sequential methotrexate and fluorouracil for the treatment of node-negative breast cancer patients with estrogen receptor-negative tumors: eight-year results from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) B-13 and first report of findings from NSABP B-19 comparing methotrexate and fluorouracil with conventional cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil.

PURPOSE: To compare sequential methotrexate (M) and fluorouracil (F) (M-->F) with surgery (National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project [NSABP] B-13) and cyclophosphamide (C), M, and F with M-->F (NSABP B-19), in patients with estrogen receptor (ER)-negative tumors and negative axillary nodes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 760 patients were randomized to B-13; 1,095 patients with the same eligibility requirements were randomized to B-19. Disease-free survival (DFS), distant disease-free survival (DDFS), and survival were determined using life-table estimates. RESULTS: A significant benefit in overall DFS (74% v 59%; P < .001) was demonstrated at 8 years in all B-13 patients who received M-->F (69% v 56% [P = .006] in those or= 50 years). A survival advantage was evident in older patients (89% v 80%; P = .03). In B-19, through 5 years, an overall DFS advantage (82% v 73%; P < .001) and a borderline survival advantage (88% v 85%; P = .06) were evident with CMF. The DFS (84% v 72%; P < .001) and survival (89% v 84%; P = .04) benefits from CMF were greater in women aged F or CMF after lumpectomy and breast irradiation resulted in a low probability of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR). In B-13, the frequency of IBTR was 2.6% following M-->F versus 13.4% in women treated by lumpectomy; it was 0.6% following CMF in B-19. Toxicity >or= grade 3 was more frequent among CMF patients in B-19. The age-related difference in CMF benefit was not related to amount of drug received. CONCLUSION: M-->F and CMF are effective for node-negative patients with ER-negative tumors. The incidence of local-regional or distant metastases and IBTR decreased after either therapy. The benefit from either therapy was evident in all patients, but the CMF advantage was greater in those F may be used in patients with medical problems that would preclude CMF administration.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗
PubMed1996

Making a place in the metropolis: locational attainment in cities and suburbs.

What accounts for the differences in the kinds of communities within the metropolis in which members of different racial and ethnic groups live? Do socioeconomic advancement and acculturation provide greater integration with whites or access to more desirable locations for minority-group members? Are these effects the same for Asians or Hispanics as for blacks? Does suburbanization offer a step toward greater equality in the housing market, or do minorities find greater discrimination in the suburban housing market? Data from 1980 for five large metropolitan regions are used to estimate "locational-attainment models," which evaluate the effects of group members' individual attributes on two measures of the character of their living environment: the socioeconomic standing (median household income) and racial composition (proportion non-Hispanic white) of the census tract where they reside. Separate models predict these outcomes for whites, blacks, Hispanics, and Asians. Net of the effects of individuals' background characteristics, whites live in census tracts with the highest average proportion of white residents and the highest median household income. They are followed by Asians and Hispanics, and-at substantially lower levels-blacks. Large overall differences exist between city and suburban locations; yet the gap between whites and others is consistently lower in the suburbs than in the cities of these five metropolitan regions.

Humans↗
PubMed1996

Community-based case management for chronically ill older adults.

A comparison study was done between case managed and non-case managed chronically ill older adults. A decrease in emergency department visits, hospital admissions, hospital length of stay and primary care physician visits resulted. In addition, a +93,519.97 difference in lost net reimbursement was found between the two groups.

Adult↗
PubMed1995

Reanalysis and results after 12 years of follow-up in a randomized clinical trial comparing total mastectomy with lumpectomy with or without irradiation in the treatment of breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Previous findings from a clinical trial (Protocol B-06) conducted by the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) indicated the worth of lumpectomy and breast irradiation for treating breast cancer. After the discovery by NSABP staff members of falsified information on patients enrolled in the study by St. Luc Hospital in Montreal, separate audits were conducted at St. Luc Hospital and other participating institutions. We report the results of both audits and update the study findings through an average of 12 years of follow-up. METHODS: Patients with either negative or positive axillary nodes and tumors 4 cm or less in diameter were randomly assigned to one of three treatments: total mastectomy, lumpectomy followed by breast irradiation, or lumpectomy without irradiation. Three cohorts of patients were analyzed. The first cohort included all 2105 randomized patients, who were analyzed according to the intention-to-treat principle. The second cohort consisted of 1851 eligible patients in the first cohort with known nodal status who agreed to be followed and who accepted their assigned therapy (among those excluded were 6 patients from St. Luc Hospital who were declared ineligible because of falsified biopsy dates). The third cohort consisted of the patients in the second cohort minus the 322 eligible patients from St. Luc Hospital (total, 1529 patients). RESULTS: Regardless of the cohort, no significant differences were found in overall survival, disease-free survival, or survival free of disease at distant sites between the patients who underwent total mastectomy and those treated by lumpectomy alone or by lumpectomy plus breast irradiation. After 12 years of follow-up, the cumulative incidence of a recurrence of tumor in the ipsilateral breast was 35 percent in the group treated with lumpectomy alone and 10 percent in the group treated with lumpectomy and breast irradiation (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings continue to indicate that lumpectomy followed by breast irradiation is appropriate therapy for women with either negative or positive axillary nodes and breast tumors 4 cm or less in diameter.

Breast Neoplasms↗
PubMed1995

Base-line quality-of-life assessment in the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Breast Cancer Prevention Trial.

BACKGROUND: The Breast Cancer Prevention Trial (BCPT) is a large, multicenter chemoprevention trial testing the efficacy of the antiestrogen drug tamoxifen for prevention of breast cancer and coronary heart disease in healthy women at high risk of breast cancer. The BCPT evolved from a series of prior studies in early stage breast cancer demonstrating the efficacy of tamoxifen in the prevention of systemic breast cancer recurrence and in the reduction of contralateral breast cancers. PURPOSE: The purpose of this article is to describe the methodologic considerations in the collection of health-related quality-of-life (HRQL) data in the BCPT and to present base-line HRQL data on the first 9749 participants. METHODS: An HRQL questionnaire that included the Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression Scale, a symptom checklist, the Medical Outcomes Study 36-item short form (MOS-SF-36), and the MOS sexual problems questions was completed by participants in the BCPT at base line (prior to random assignment). Medical and demographic information, as well as projected risk of breast cancer, were collected as part of study eligibility. Descriptive and correlational data were examined for these study participants. RESULTS: BCPT participants report high levels of functioning compared with U.S. general population norms but still report an average of 8.9 distinct symptoms during the past 4 weeks. Depression is less prevalent among the participants than in community samples, which reflects the exclusion of clinically depressed individuals. Sixty-five percent reported being sexually active in the past 6 months, with an age-related decline in sexual activity. Younger women reported fewer sexual problems than older women. There is a strong correlation between the two mental health measures, moderate to weak correlations between HRQL scales and levels of self-reported symptoms, and only weak correlations between measures of breast cancer risk and HRQL scales. The MOS-SF-36 scores were examined for three consecutive recruitment samples (0-6 months, 7-12 months, and 13-20 months), and the base-line scores were slightly better for the earliest group of participants. CONCLUSIONS: This article demonstrates the feasibility of collecting HRQL data in a large, multicenter, chemoprevention trial for women at high risk of breast cancer. The successful integration of HRQL data collection into this clinical trial attests to its value as a safety-monitoring end point and as an explicit and measurable outcome for the entire trial. IMPLICATIONS: HRQL data are important for studies in which healthy populations are involved and in which the potential for decrements in quality of life are real or perceived.

Adult↗
PubMed1995

Pathologic findings from the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast Project (NSABP) Protocol B-17. Intraductal carcinoma (ductal carcinoma in situ). The National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Collaborating Investigators.

BACKGROUND: Controversy exists concerning the natural history of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast, including its pathologic expression and treatment. This controversy has been fostered largely by the retrospective nature and limited sample sizes of extant studies. METHOD: Resolution of some of these issues was attempted by analyzing the pathologic features of 573 examples of DCIS obtained from a larger cohort of 790 women with DCIS enrolled in Protocol B-17 of the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast Project. This prospective randomized clinical trial was performed to assess the efficacy of local breast irradiation to reduce the incidence of second ipsilateral breast tumors (IBT) after lumpectomy. RESULTS: Tumor and patient characteristics, including significantly less IBT for those treated by lumpectomy and irradiation than lumpectomy alone, were almost identical for the subset comprising this analysis and the total B-17 cohort reported previously. The presence of moderate/marked comedo necrosis, which was evaluated as an independent parameter rather than as a specific histologic type of DCIS and uncertain/involved lumpectomy margins were the only statistically significant independent predictors of IBT for patients treated by lumpectomy as well as irradiation. The latter markedly reduced the annual hazard rates for the IBT associated with these indicators. CONCLUSIONS: Although not an endpoint of this study, the authors' findings suggest that the beneficial effect of irradiation in reducing IBT after lumpectomy for DCIS occurs with small (< 1.0 cm.) and larger lesions. Moderate/marked comedo necrosis and uncertain/involved lumpectomy margins represent independent predictors of IBT.

Adult↗
PubMed1995

Tamoxifen with and without radiation after partial mastectomy in patients with involved nodes.

PURPOSE: To determine the effect of tamoxifen on local control after partial mastectomy with and without adjuvant breast irradiation. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A retrospective study of 97 node positive patients identified from the records of the London Regional Cancer Center included 44 patients who received tamoxifen and breast irradiation (40 or 50 Gy plus booster dose) after partial mastectomy, and 53 patients who received tamoxifen only after partial mastectomy. Base line characteristics of the two groups were similar. RESULTS: At 39 months actuarial follow-up there was a breast tumor recurrence (BTR) in 5% vs. 21% of patients when radiation was omitted (p = 0.0388), but there was no difference in the cause-specific mortality of the two treatment groups. Cox Regression analysis (on only 10 BTR) showed age and adjuvant radiation as significant predictors of BTR. In patients not receiving radiation, no BTR was seen in 22 patients > or = 70 years of age at diagnosis vs. 8 BTR in 31 patients < 70 years (p = 0.0130). All BTR occurred while patients were receiving tamoxifen. CONCLUSIONS: Tamoxifen alone with omission of radiation after partial mastectomy provides inferior breast tumor control in node positive patients. This is especially true for patients under 70 years of age. Patients aged 70 years or older at the time of diagnosis of breast cancer who receive tamoxifen have a low rate of breast tumor recurrence when radiation is omitted. These patients represent a group for whom radiation might not be necessary.

Adult↗