Search PubMed⌕ Search

Biomedical subjects

B Fisher

Publications and source records attributed to B Fisher.

At least 91 records · Page 5Linked to original sources

Prognosis among African-American women and white women with lymph node negative breast carcinoma: findings from two randomized clinical trials of the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP).

BACKGROUND: A disparity in breast carcinoma survival between African-American and white women has been noted over the past several decades. A major factor implicated in this disparity is stage of disease at diagnosis. In this study, survival and related endpoints were examined among African-American women and white women with lymph node negative breast carcinoma who participated in two randomized clinical trials of the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP). METHODS: Patients from two studies, one conducted among patients with estrogen receptor (ER) negative tumors and the other among patients with ER positive tumors, were included. Study goals were to determine whether African-Americans and whites had comparable outcomes, accounting for ER status and differences in patient characteristics at diagnosis, and to determine whether treatment response was similar for African-Americans and whites. RESULTS: Five-year survival rates were 83% for African-Americans and 85% for whites among ER negative patients, and 93% for African-Americans and 92% for whites among ER positive patients. Rates of disease free survival (DFS) (i.e., time to disease recurrence, second primary cancer, or death) were 71% for African-Americans and 74% for whites at 5 years among ER negative patients, and 81% for African-Americans and 80% for whites among ER positive patients. African-Americans tended to have less favorable baseline prognostic characteristics. Adjusted relative risk (RR) estimates indicated similar prognosis for African-Americans compared with whites for mortality (African-American/white RR = 1.02 with 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.66-1.56 among ER negative patients; RR = 1.14 with 95% CI, 0.84-1.54 among ER positive patients) and DFS (RR = 0.98 with 95% CI, 0.70-1.37 for ER negative patients; RR = 0.96 with 95% CI, 0.75-1.22 for ER positive patients). Estimated percent reductions in DFS events for patients receiving adjuvant therapy were 32% for ER negative African-Americans, 36% for ER negative whites, 20% for ER positive African-Americans, and 39% for ER positive whites. CONCLUSIONS: African-American and white patients with localized breast carcinoma had similar outcomes and benefited equally from systemic therapy. These results suggest that early detection and appropriate therapy among African-American patients could result in a reduction in the current disparity in breast carcinoma mortality between African-Americans and whites.

Black People↗

Coronary heart disease mortality and adjuvant tamoxifen therapy.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Data from randomized clinical trials in Scotland and Sweden testing the efficacy of tamoxifen therapy in patients with breast cancer have suggested that the drug may also reduce the risk of coronary heart disease. In view of these findings, we examined mortality from coronary heart disease among patients with early stage breast cancer who were enrolled in the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-14 trial of tamoxifen therapy. METHODS: Deaths occurring among women who were randomly assigned to 5 years of either tamoxifen or placebo in the first phase of the B-14 trial were reviewed to determine the cause. Three categories of heart disease-related death were defined: 1) death from a definite fatal myocardial infarction, 2) death from definite fatal coronary heart disease/possible myocardial infarction, and 3) death from possible fatal coronary heart disease. Comparisons of the findings by treatment group were made on the basis of average annual hazard (i.e., death) rates and the corresponding relative hazard of death. RESULTS: The average annual death rate from coronary heart disease was lower for patients who received tamoxifen than for patients who received placebo, but the difference was not statistically significant. There were eight definite heart-related deaths (i.e., definite fatal myocardial infarction or definite fatal coronary heart disease/possible myocardial infarction) among the patients who received tamoxifen, yielding an average annual rate of 0.62 per 1000 patients. There were 12 definite heart-related deaths among the patients who received placebo, yielding an average annual rate of 0.94 per 1000. The corresponding relative hazard of death from definite fatal heart disease (tamoxifen versus placebo) was 0.66 (95% confidence interval = 0.27-1.61). Eleven deaths in the tamoxifen group and 10 deaths in the placebo group were classified as possible cases of fatal coronary heart disease. When these cases and the definite cases were considered together, the average annual death rate for the patients who received tamoxifen was 1.48 per 1000, and the rate for the patients who received placebo was 1.73 per 1000. The corresponding relative hazard of death was 0.85 (95% confidence interval = 0.46-1.58). CONCLUSIONS: The findings from the B-14 trial are consistent with the findings from the Scottish and the Swedish trials, suggesting that tamoxifen treatment reduces coronary heart disease among patients with breast cancer. Continued follow-up of the patients in these trials and in ongoing prevention trials is needed to accumulate enough data so that reliable conclusions can be drawn about the benefits of tamoxifen in preventing heart disease.

Adult↗

A phase I pilot study of pelvic radiation and alpha-2A interferon in patients with locally advanced or recurrent rectal cancer.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this pilot study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose of alpha-2a interferon given by subcutaneous injection and combined with high dose pelvic radiation for locally advanced or recurrent rectal cancer. METHODS AND MATERIALS: In this Phase I pilot study, patients with locally advanced, unresectable, or recurrent rectal cancer with or without distant metastases received external beam pelvic radiotherapy over 5 to 6 weeks combined with escalating doses of alpha-2a interferon. Interferon was escalated in increments of 3 million units for each patient cohort, starting at 3 million units subcutaneously 3 days weekly during pelvic radiation. Radiotherapy consisted of 44 Gy (2 Gy fractions) to the pelvis followed by a boost of 6 Gy or 16 Gy to gross pelvic tumor, depending on the presence or absence of small bowel in the boost field, respectively. Between 1991 and 1993, 10 patients were treated on this study, five with locally advanced and five with locally recurrent rectal cancer. RESULTS: At 6 million units of interferon, Grade 3 (WHO criteria) toxicities were as follows: diarrhea (one), leukopenia (one), and neutropenia (one). One patient died of a massive GI bleed at this dose level. Death was not felt to be treatment related. The maximum tolerated dose of interferon was 3 million units three times weekly with radiation. Three patients had unusual complications at 4, 6, and 6 months possibly related to treatment. The first had a right distal ureteric stricture with a right urinoma. The second had a sudden left foot drop that has remained stable. The third had sudden onset of bilateral lower extremity paraplegia with spontaneous resolution. CONCLUSIONS: The maximally tolerated dose of interferon alpha-2a given three times weekly during pelvic radiation was 3 million units based on acute side effects. Nevertheless, even at this dose level there were three unusual subacute complications possibly related to treatment. Caution is advised when combining interferon alpha-2a with high dose pelvic radiation, especially in patients with predisposing conditions (such as diabetes) for radiotherapy complications.

Aged↗

A clinical trial to evaluate the worth of preoperative multimodality therapy in patients with operable carcinoma of the rectum: a progress report of National Surgical Breast and Bowel Project Protocol R-03.

PURPOSE: National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Protocol R-03 was designed to determine the worth of preoperative chemotherapy and radiation therapy in the management of operable rectal cancer. METHODS: Thus far, 116 patients of an eventual 900 with primary operable rectal cancer have been randomized to receive multimodality therapy to begin preoperatively (59 patients) or identical therapy beginning after curative surgery (57). All patients received seven cycles of 5-fluorouracil (FU)/leucovorin (LV) chemotherapy. Cycles 1 and 4 through 7 used a high-dose weekly FU regimen. In Cycles 2 and 3, FU and low-dose LV chemotherapy was given during the first and fifth week of radiation therapy (5,040 cGy). The preoperative arm (Group 1) received the first three cycles of chemotherapy and all radiation therapy before surgery. The postoperative arm (Group 2) received all radiation and chemotherapy after surgery. Primary study end points included disease-free survival and survival. Secondary end points included local recurrence, primary tumor response to combination therapy, tumor downstaging, and sphincter preservation. RESULTS: Overall treatment-related toxicity was similar in both groups. Although seven preoperative patients had events after randomization that precluded surgery, eight events occurred during an equivalent follow-up period in the postoperative group. No patient was deemed inoperable because of progressive local disease. Sphincter-saving surgery was intended in 31 percent of Group 1 patients and 33 percent of Group 2 patients at the time of randomization. Such surgery was actually performed in 50 percent of the preoperatively treated patients and 33 percent of the postoperatively treated patients. The use of protective colostomy in patients undergoing sphincter-sparing surgery and the development of perioperative complications in all surgical patients were similar in both groups. There was evidence of tumor downstaging in evaluable patients undergoing preoperative therapy, with 8 percent of Group 1 patients having had a pathologic complete response. CONCLUSION: These data do suggest that the preoperative chemotherapy and radiation therapy regimen used are, at least, as safe and tolerable as standard postoperative treatment. There is presently a trend to tumor downstaging and sphincter preservation in the preoperative arm. Whether this arm will have greater or lesser survival and long-term toxicity awaits the completion of this relevant study.

Adenocarcinoma↗

Intra- and extracranial artery blood velocity during a sudden blood pressure decrease in humans.

The intra- and extracerebral Doppler artery blood velocity responses to a 10-mmHg abrupt blood pressure (BP) decrease in ten healthy men were studied. This decrease was obtained using two cuffs placed over both thighs. First, cuffs were inflated to pressures greater than the arterial BP for 5 min. Next, they were deflated to 60 mmHg in order to prevent venous return from the legs. We obtained a decrease in mean arterial BP of from 101 (10) to 90 (10) mmHg [mean (SD), P < 0.01] without modifications in the heart rate [HR, 88 (14) beats min-1]. Middle cerebral artery mean blood velocity (MCAmv) decreased immediately from 50 (10) to 42 (12) cm s-1 (P < 0.05). Simultaneously, temporal superficial artery mean blood velocity (TSAmv) decreased from 11 (3) to 7 (2) cm s-1 (P < 0.05) and common carotid artery blood flow (CCAbf) decreased from 305 (23) to 233 (33) ml min-1 (P < 0.05). After 5 s, MCAmv and CCAbf returned to baseline values, whereas TSAmv [8 (2) cm s-1], mean arterial BP [86 (10) mmHg] remained low and HR increased [92 (12) beats min-1]. TSAmv, BP and HR returned to baseline values in 1 min. These data confirm that cerebral blood flow (CBF) is very rapidly regulated but that blood flow in extracranial territories is not and that it follows the arterial BP changes.

Adult↗

Interaction between cortisol and tumour necrosis factor with concurrent resistance and endurance training.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effect of concurrent resistance and endurance training on tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF alpha), urinary free cortisol, strength [one-repetition maximum (1 RM)], and maximal oxygen consumption (Vo2max). DESIGN: Randomized control trial of 12 weeks' duration. SETTING: University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada. PARTICIPANTS: Forty-five healthy female (n = 18) and male (n = 27) subjects who had not formally trained for at least 6 months prior to the study but were physically active. The mean +/- SD age, height, and body mass for all subjects were 22.3 +/- 3.3 years, 1.76 +/- 9.32 m, and 73.4 +/- 11.6 kg, respectively. INTERVENTION: The subjects were randomly assigned to four groups: strength training only (S), n = 10; endurance training only (E), n = 11; combined strength and endurance training (SE), n = 13; and a control group (C), n = 10. The S and E groups performed progressively overloaded training sessions three times per week for 12 weeks. The SE group completed the same strength and endurance training programs on different days (i.e., 6 days/week) for 12 weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Serum levels of TNF alpha, urinary free cortisol, 1 RM, and Vo2max were measured before and after 6 and 12 weeks of training. RESULTS: Significant increases in leg press and knee extension 1 RM occurred after training in both S and SE groups, but the relative gains in knee extension 1 RM were greater in the S group. Similar increases in Vo2max were observed in groups E and SE (p < 0.05). Cortisol was significantly increased in the SE group for women and decreased in the E group for men after training. TNF alpha was significantly elevated in the women of group E after training. No correlation was observed between urinary free cortisol and TNF alpha with training. CONCLUSION: These results indicate that a partial interference effect of compromised strength gains in unilateral knee extension of the men occurred after concurrent strength and endurance training that could not be attributed to an interaction between cortisol and TNF alpha in response to this type of exercise.

Adult↗

Supratentorial low-grade glioma in adults: an analysis of prognostic factors and timing of radiation.

PURPOSE: To review the outcomes of patients with low-grade glioma diagnosed by modern imaging and treated at a center where postponing radiotherapy was common practice. METHODS: We reviewed the records of patients (age > or = 18 years) with pathologically confirmed supratentorial low-grade fibrillary astrocytoma, oligodendroglioma, and mixed glioma treated at a regional cancer center in Canada between 1979 and 1995. RESULTS: Median survival for the entire group (N = 167; mean age 40.6 years) was 10.5 years with 5- and 10-year survival rates of 72% and 50%, respectively. Median progression-free survival was 4.9 years with 5- and 10-year progression-free rates of 50% and 12%, respectively. Overall and progression-free survivals were longer for patients with an oligodendroglioma or mixed glioma than with astrocytoma (median 13 v 7.5 years, P = .003; progression-free 5.6 v 4.4 years, p = .054). Age at diagnosis < or = 40 years, seizures at presentation, minimal residual tumor after surgery, Karnofsky performance status > or = 70, and oligodendroglioma or mixed glioma pathology were associated with significantly longer median survival on univariate and multivariate analyses. Radiotherapy deferred until tumor progression (v immediate radiotherapy) was associated with longer survival on univariate analysis, but an imbalance in other variables accounted for this advantage such that timing of radiotherapy was not an independent (favorable or adverse) prognostic factor on multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: Patients with low-grade glioma diagnosed by modern imaging can be expected to live a long time; timing of radiotherapy may be a less important determinant of survival than nontreatment variables and residual tumor bulk.

Actuarial Analysis↗

Increased intensification and total dose of cyclophosphamide in a doxorubicin-cyclophosphamide regimen for the treatment of primary breast cancer: findings from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-22.

PURPOSE: The National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) initiated a randomized trial (B-22) to determine if intensifying but maintaining the total dose of cyclophosphamide (Cytoxan, Bristol-Myers Squibb Oncology, Princeton, NJ) in a doxorubicin (Adriamycin, Pharmacia, Kalamazoo, MI)-cyclophosphamide combination (AC), or if intensifying and increasing the total dose of cyclophosphamide improves the outcome of women with primary breast cancer and positive axillary nodes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients (N = 2,305) were randomized to receive either four courses of standard AC therapy (group 1); intensified therapy, in which the same total dose of cyclophosphamide was administered in two courses (group 2); or intensified and increased therapy, in which the total dose of cyclophosphamide was doubled (group 3). The dose and intensity of doxorubicin were similar in all groups. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival were determined using life-table estimates. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in DFS (P = .30) or overall survival (P = .95) among the groups through 5 years. At 5 years, the DFS of women in group 1 was similar to that of women in group 2 (62% v 60%, respectively; P = .43) and to that of women in group 3 (62% v 64%, respectively; P = .59). The 5-year survival of women in group 1 was similar to that of women in group 2 (78% v 77%, respectively; P = .86) and to that of women in group 3 (78% v 77%, respectively; P = .82). Grade 4 toxicity increased in groups 2 and 3. Failure to note a difference in outcome among the groups was unrelated to either differences in amount and intensity of cyclophosphamide or to dose delays and intervals between courses of therapy. CONCLUSION: Intensifying or intensifying and increasing the total dose of cyclophosphamide failed to significantly improve either DFS or overall survival in any group. It was concluded that, outside of a clinical trial, dose-intensification of cyclophosphamide in an AC combination represents inappropriate therapy for women with primary breast cancer.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗

Effect of preoperative chemotherapy on local-regional disease in women with operable breast cancer: findings from National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project B-18.

PURPOSE: To determine whether preoperative doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (AC) permits more lumpectomies to be performed and decreases the incidence of positive nodes in women with primary breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Women (n = 1,523) were randomized to National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) B-18; 759 eligible patients received postoperative AC and 747, preoperative AC. The clinical size of breast and axillary tumors was determined before each of four cycles of AC and before surgery. Tumor response to preoperative therapy was clinically complete (cCR), partial (cPR), stable (cSD), or progressive disease (cPD). Tissue from patients with a cCR was evaluated for a pathologic complete response (pCR). RESULTS: Breast tumor size was reduced in 80% of patients after preoperative therapy; 36% had a cCR. Tumor size and clinical nodal status were independent predictors of cCR. Twenty-six percent of women with a cCR had a pCR. Clinical nodal response occurred in 89% of node-positive patients: 73% had a cCR and 44% of those had a pCR. There was a 37% increase in the incidence of pathologically negative nodes. Before randomization, lumpectomy was proposed for 86% of women with tumors < or = 2 cm, 70% with tumors 2.1 to 5.0 cm, and 3% with tumors > or = 5.1 cm. Clinical tumor size and nodal status influenced the physician's decision. Overall, 12% more lumpectomies were performed in the preoperative group; in women with tumors > or = 5.1 cm, there was a 175% increase. CONCLUSION: Preoperative therapy reduced the size of most breast tumors and decreased the incidence of positive nodes. The greatest increase in lumpectomy after preoperative therapy occurred in women with tumors > or = 5 cm, since women with tumors less than 5 cm were already lumpectomy candidates. Preoperative therapy should be considered for the initial management of breast tumors judged too large for lumpectomy.

Antibiotics, Antineoplastic↗

Five versus more than five years of tamoxifen therapy for breast cancer patients with negative lymph nodes and estrogen receptor-positive tumors.

BACKGROUND: In 1982, the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project initiated a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial (B-14) to determine the effectiveness of adjuvant tamoxifen therapy in patients with primary operable breast cancer who had estrogen receptor-positive tumors and no axillary lymph node involvement. The findings indicated that tamoxifen therapy provided substantial benefit to patients with early stage disease. However, questions arose about how long the observed benefit would persist, about the duration of therapy necessary to maintain maximum benefit, and about the nature and severity of adverse effects from prolonged treatment. PURPOSE: We evaluated the outcome of patients in the B-14 trial through 10 years of follow-up. In addition, the effects of 5 years versus more than 5 years of tamoxifen therapy were compared. METHODS: In the trial, patients were initially assigned to receive either tamoxifen at 20 mg/day (n = 1404) or placebo (n = 1414). Tamoxifen-treated patients who remained disease free after 5 years of therapy were then reassigned to receive either another 5 years of tamoxifen (n = 322) or 5 years of placebo (n = 321). After the study began, another group of patients who met the same protocol eligibility requirements as the randomly assigned patients were registered to receive tamoxifen (n = 1211). Registered patients who were disease free after 5 years of treatment were also randomly assigned to another 5 years of tamoxifen (n = 261) or to 5 years of placebo (n = 249). To compare 5 years with more than 5 years of tamoxifen therapy, data relating to all patients reassigned to an additional 5 years of the drug were combined. Patients who were not reassigned to either tamoxifen or placebo continued to be followed in the study. Survival, disease-free survival, and distant disease-free survival (relating to failure at distant sites) were estimated by use of the Kaplan-Meier method; differences between the treatment groups were assessed by use of the logrank test. The relative risks of failure (with 95% confidence intervals [CIs]) were determined by use of the Cox proportional hazards model. Reported P values are two-sided. RESULTS: Through 10 years of follow-up, a significant advantage in disease-free survival (69% versus 57%, P < .0001; relative risk = 0.66; 95% CI = 0.58-0.74), distant disease-free survival (76% versus 67%, P < .0001; relative risk = 0.70; 95% CI = 0.61-0.81), and survival (80% versus 76%, P = .02; relative risk = 0.84; 95% CI = 0.71-0.99) was found for patients in the group first assigned to receive tamoxifen. The survival benefit extended to those 49 years of age or younger and to those 50 years of age or older. Tamoxifen therapy was associated with a 37% reduction in the incidence of contralateral (opposite) breast cancer (P = .007). Through 4 years after the reassignment of tamoxifen-treated patients to either continued-therapy or placebo groups, advantages in disease-free survival (92% versus 86%, P = .003) and distant disease-free survival (96% versus 90%, P = .01) were found for those who discontinued tamoxifen treatment. Survival was 96% for those who discontinued tamoxifen compared with 94% for those who continued tamoxifen treatment (P = .08). A higher incidence of thromboembolic events was seen in tamoxifen-treated patients (through 5 years, 1.7% versus 0.4%). Except for endometrial cancer, the incidence of second cancers was not increased with tamoxifen therapy. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: The benefit from 5 years of tamoxifen therapy persists through 10 years of follow-up. No additional advantage is obtained from continuing tamoxifen therapy for more than 5 years.

Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal↗

Pathologic findings from the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast Project (NSABP) Protocol B-17. Five-year observations concerning lobular carcinoma in situ.

BACKGROUND: Extant information reveals inconsistencies concerning the natural history, pathologic features, and treatment of lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS) of the breast. It is uncertain whether these are related to the methods of study, diagnostic criteria employed, relative paucity of cases, or varying lengths of follow-up. METHODS: The cohort was comprised of 182 women with LCIS who were enrolled in National Surgical Adjuvant Breast Project (NSABP) Protocol B-17 but received no treatment other than lumpectomy. Nineteen pathologic features were assessed and related to ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) and contralateral breast tumor recurrence (CBTR) at a mean time on study of 5 years. RESULTS: Thirteen IBTR and 4 CBTR, including 1 instance of bilateral recurrence, were observed. All IBTR occurred in the same quadrant as the index LCIS. All 4 (2.2%) IBTR that were invasive cancers were of the lobular type, as was 1 of the 2 (1.1%) CBTR that were invasive. The other was a mucinous carcinoma. Three (1.6%) IBTR were pure ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and another was accompanied by LCIS. One instance of CBTR was also comprised of DCIS and LCIS. The remaining five IBTR and one CBTR were LCIS only. The only pathologic parameter found to be significantly predictive for invasive IBTR and DCIS was type 3 and, to a lesser extent, type 2 LCIS. Some heretofore unrecognized or little appreciated pathologic features of LCIS are noted. Ancillary histochemical findings strongly implicate the derivation of LCIS from ductal or secretory cells rather than "new cells" or myoepithelial elements. All examples tested were found to be c-erb B-2 negative, universally diploid with normoproliferative DNA content, and estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor positive. No other events related to the breast were encountered. CONCLUSIONS: The number of events observed in this large cohort of patients with LCIS is markedly less than that noted by others after a comparable period of follow-up. Possible reasons for this dichotomy, including differences in patient characteristics, diagnostic criteria, and status of resection margins, are discussed. Considerations are also offered to support the view that LCIS may exhibit precursor activity as well as represent a risk factor (the term marker is literally inaccurate). In this light, the designation LCIS rather than lobular neoplasia is preferred. These preliminary findings and historical information presented in this study fail to provide any reason to perform mastectomy on patients with LCIS.

Breast Neoplasms↗

A randomized trial to assess the efficacy of surgery in addition to radiotherapy in patients with a single cerebral metastasis.

BACKGROUND: Cerebral metastasis is a common oncologic problem that occurs in 15-30% of cancer patients; approximately half such metastases are single. Previous retrospective studies and two randomized trials reported that the addition of surgical extirpation prior to radiation therapy increased survival, neurologic function, and quality of life compared with radiation alone in patients with a single brain metastasis. METHODS: A randomized controlled trial was conducted in which patients with a single brain metastasis were allocated to undergo radiation alone or surgery plus radiation. Radiation consisted of 3000 centigray to the whole brain in 10 fractions. RESULTS: Forty-three patients received radiation alone and 41 patients surgery plus radiation. All but two of the study patients died. No difference in survival was detected between the groups; the median survival for the radiation group was 6.3 months (95% confidence interval, 3-11.4) compared with 5.6 months for the surgery plus radiation group (95% confidence interval, 3.9-7.2) (P = 0.24). Most patients died within the first year (69.8% in the radiation arm vs. 87.8% in the surgery plus radiation arm). There were no significant differences in the 30-day mortality, morbidity, or causes of death. Extracranial metastases was an important predictor of mortality (relative risk, 2.3). The mean proportion of days that the Karnofsky performance status was > or = 70% did not differ between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: This trial failed to demonstrate that the addition of surgery to radiation therapy improved outcome of patients with a single brain metastasis. Thus, the efficacy of surgery plus radiation compared with radiation alone needs to be addressed by further clinical trials and/or a meta-analysis.

Brain Neoplasms↗

Adjuvant chemotherapy plus tamoxifen compared with tamoxifen alone for postmenopausal breast cancer: meta-analysis of quality-adjusted survival.

BACKGROUND: Adjuvant tamoxifen for early breast cancer provides an improvement in relapse-free (RFS) and overall survival (OS), especially for older women. We carried out a meta-analysis to find out whether the benefit of adding chemotherapy to tamoxifen outweighs its costs in terms of toxic effects for postmenopausal patients. METHODS: The meta-analysis of quality-adjusted survival was based on data from 3920 patients aged 50 years or older with node-positive breast cancer randomly assigned in nine trials that compared combination chemotherapy plus tamoxifen with tamoxifen alone. The nine trials were included in the worldwide overview conducted by the early breast cancer trialists' collaborative group (EBCTCG). The quality-adjusted time without symptoms or toxicity (Q-TWiST) method was used to provide treatment comparisons incorporating differences in quality of life associated with subjective toxic effects of treatment and symptoms of disease relapse. FINDINGS: Within 7 years of follow-up the modest benefit of increased RFS and OS for patients who received chemotherapy just balanced the costs in terms of acute toxic side-effects. Chemotherapy-treated patients gained an average of 5.4 months of RFS and 2 months of OS (neither statistically significant), but had to receive cytotoxic treatment for between 2 and 24 months to achieve these gains. No values of preference weights for time spent undergoing chemotherapy and time after relapse gave significantly more Q-TWiST with chemotherapy plus tamoxifen than with tamoxifen alone. INTERPRETATION: Within 7 years of follow-up, adjuvant chemoendocrine therapy did not provide more quality-adjusted survival time than tamoxifen alone for women aged 50 years or older with node-positive breast cancer. Better selection and administration of chemotherapy regimen, different scheduling of chemotherapy and tamoxifen, and appropriate use of patient and tumour characteristics may increase the therapeutic advantage of the combination.

Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal↗

Radiosurgery for the treatment of previously irradiated recurrent primary brain tumors and brain metastases: initial report of radiation therapy oncology group protocol (90-05).

PURPOSE: To determine the maximum acutely tolerable dose of single fraction radiosurgery in patients with recurrent previously irradiated primary brain tumors or brain metastases. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between August 1990 and September 1993, 102 analyzable patients were entered on Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) protocol 90-05, 38 of whom had recurrent primary brain tumors (median prior dose 60 Gy), and 64 of whom had recurrent brain metastases (median prior dose 30 Gy) < or = 40 mm in maximum diameter. Unacceptable toxicity was defined as irreversible Grade 3, any Grade 4, or Grade 5 central nervous system (CNS) toxicity according to the RTOG CNS criteria, occurring in > 20% of patients per treatment arm within 3 months of radiosurgery. RESULTS: Patients were initially entered onto one of three treatment arms according to the maximum diameter of the recurrent lesion. Twelve to 22 patients were entered on each arm. The dose levels were: arm 1, < or = 20 mm, 18 Gy; arm 2, 21-30 mm, 15 Gy; and arm 3, 31-40 mm, 12 Gy. Subsequently, doses were escalated as follows: arm 4, < or = 20mm, 21 Gy; arm 5, 21-30 mm 18 Gy; and arm 6, 31-40 mm, 15 Gy. Unacceptable acute toxicity secondary to cerebral edema occurred in 0, 7 and 5% of patients on Arms 1, 2 and 3, respectively, and in no patients on arms 4, 5, or 6. Multivariate analysis revealed that tumor volume > or = 8200 mm(3) and a ratio of maximum dose to prescription dose (MD/PD) > or = 2 were significantly associated unacceptable toxicity. Of 15 patients with both tumor volume > or = 8200 mm(3) and MD/PD > or = 2, unacceptable toxicity occurred in 2 of 4 treated with a single isocenter and 1 of 11 treated with multiple isocenters. Subsequently, operation for symptomatic radionecrosis was required in 6% of patients. CONCLUSION: We found that the incidence of acute toxicity was acceptable at 0-7% in patients with recurrent, previously irradiated primary brain tumors or brain metastases < or = 40 mm in maximum diameter treated according to the protocol described.

Adult↗

Childhood medulloblastoma in Ontario, 1977-1987: population-based results.

A retrospective review was carried out to study children, not more than 16 years old, with a confirmed diagnosis of medulloblastoma, who were residents of the Province of Ontario at the time of diagnosis between 1977 and 1987 inclusive. The provincial tumour registry provided the population database. One hundred and eight children with medulloblastoma were identified of whom 72 (67%) were initially treated at University of Toronto Centres and 36 (33%) at other Health Science Centres, hospitals, and Regional Cancer Centres (RCC) in Ontario. The hospital/Cancer Centre records were reviewed. The 5-year relapse-free survival (RFS) for all patients treated in Ontario was 58% (SE = 5%). Those treated in Toronto had a 5-year RFS of 65% (SE = 6%) compared to 44% (SE = 8%) for those treated in other RCCs in the province (P = 0.02). Relapse-free survival for the RCCs ranged from 25 to 60%, with a trend for improved survival with increasing centre size. Univariate analysis of determinants of relapse-free survival for all 108 patients showed the following variables to be significant: T-stage (Tx + T1 + T2 vs. T3A + T3B) P = 0.0004, M-stage (M0 + Mx vs. M1-4) P = 0.0006, extent of resection (total vs. less than total) P = 0.002, radiotherapy (craniospinal irradiation and posterior fossa boost vs. other) P = 0.02, and treatment centre (Toronto centres vs. RCC) P = 0.02. Cases treated at centres outside metropolitan Toronto had a nearly two-fold (relative risk = 1.93; 95% confidence interval = 1.07, 3.47) greater risk of recurrence or death than those seen in Toronto. However, in multivariate analysis this difference was not quite significant (P = 0.07) after controlling for stage (T and M), extent of resection, meningitis, and gender. These data suggest that patients with medulloblastoma should be referred for treatment to large centres with major pediatric neurosurgical and oncology resources.

Cerebellar Neoplasms↗