Biomedical subjects

Andy Purvis

Publications and source records attributed to Andy Purvis.

23 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

PubMed2002

Evaluating phylogenetic tree shape: two modifications to Fusco & Cronk's method.

Measurement of the degree of asymmetry in phylogenetic trees is important because a tree's shape reflects the process by which it has grown. For example, highly asymmetric trees are evidence that species have had different potential for diversification. Of the tree shape measures in the literature, that proposed by Fusco & Cronk (J. theor. Biol.175, 235-243) appears to be particularly useful, because it does not require fully-resolved trees whose terminals are of equal taxonomic rank. The value of the asymmetry or imbalance at a node is intended to be independent of the number of species ultimately descended from the node. In this paper, however, we point out that the value does depend upon species number. We propose two modifications that remove the dependency and so increase the measure's usefulness. We illustrate the use of the modified measures, which are implemented in a freely-available program, MESA.

Animals↗

PubMed2002

Comparative methods and evolution.

Comparative biology provides a framework for the study of evolution, by seeking answers to the question of why traits evolved. However, the difficulties of making inferences about the biological causes of trait variation and covariation resulted in the development of very different approaches to comparative analyses, which are outlined and contrasted here. The Homology approach differs from all other approaches as it attempts to explain historical uniques, whereas the various homoplasy approaches draw inferences from repeated origination of correlated traits. A distinction is made between those approaches deriving information from correlated transitions of characters on a cladogram (Homoplasy I) and those that simply extract correlated differences between pairs of phylogenetically independent taxa (Homoplasy II). The latter approach has been implemented in well-developed analytical procedures ("comparative methods") which, however, are principally non-historical and thus their inferences about evolution are indirect. In contrast, the study of correlation of character transitions seeks to explain trait variation as the outcome of evolution, but is hampered by the difficulty of reconstructing ancestral character states, a prerequisite for the analysis of correlated transitions. Model-based techniques for ancestral state reconstruction are being developed, but the lack of data contained in single characters limits the biological reality of parameter-intensive models.

Animals↗

PubMed2002

A phylogenetic supertree of the bats (Mammalia: Chiroptera).

We present the first estimate of the phylogenetic relationships among all 916 extant and nine recently extinct species of bats Mammalia: Chiroptera), a group that accounts for almost one-quarter of extant mammalian diversity. This phylogeny was derived by combining 105 estimates of bat phylogenetic relationships published since 1970 using the supertree construction technique of Matrix Representation with Parsimony (MRP). Despite the explosive growth in the number of phylogenetic studies of bats since 1990, phylogenetic relationships in the order have been studied non-randomly. For example, over one-third of all bat systematic studies to date have locused on relationships within Phyllostomidae, whereas relationships within clades such as Kerivoulinae and Murinae have never been studied using cladistic methods. Resolution in the supertree similarly differs among clades: overall resolution is poor (46.4%, of a fully bifurcating solution) but reaches 100% in some groups (e.g. relationships within Mormoopidae). The supertree analysis does not support a recent proposal that Microchiroptera is paraphyletic with respect to Megachiroptera, as the majority of source topologies support microbat monophyly. Although it is not a substitute for comprehensive phylogenetic analyses of primary molecular and morphological data, the bat supertree provides a useful tool for future phylogenetic comparative and macroevolutionary studies. Additionally, it identifies clades that have been little studied, highlights groups within which relationships are controversial, and like all phylogenetic studies, provides preliminary hypotheses that can form starting points for future phylogenetic studies of bats.

Animals↗

PubMed2002

Phylogeny imbalance: taxonomic level matters.

Two lines of evidence indicate that the degree of symmetry in phylogenetic topologies differs at different hierarchical levels. First, in a set of 61 phylogenies with superspecific taxa as their terminals, trees were on average more unbalanced (asymmetric) when the species richness of terminals was considered than when it was not. Second, nodes with a given number of higher taxa descended from them were on average more unbalanced than were nodes with the same number of species as descendants. There are several possible reasons--some biological, some artifactual--for the differences. Whatever the reason, these results caution against treating species-level and higher level phylogenies as equivalent when considering tree shape. The imbalance measure adopted here permits the use of trees that contain polytomies, facilitating a larger sample than has been achieved previously.

Animals↗

PubMed2002

Power of eight tree shape statistics to detect nonrandom diversification: a comparison by simulation of two models of cladogenesis.

We used simulations to compare the relative power of eight statistical tests to detect imbalance in phylogenies that is too great to be ascribed to an equal-rates Markov null model. Three of these tests have never had their power assessed before. Our simulations are the first to assess performance under scenarios in which the speciation rates of various lineages can evolve independently. In one of the scenarios explored, rates depend upon the value of an evolving trait, whereas in the other the probability that a species will speciate declines with the time since it last did so. The results indicate that the relative performance of the methods depends upon how the imbalance is generated. Different types of processes lead to different imbalance signatures, i.e., different patterns of imbalance at different depths in the phylogeny, and the measures of tree shape differ in the depth of phylogeny at which they are most sensitive. Relative performance is also affected by tree size but does not appear to depend greatly upon the degree of speciation rate variation among lineages. Two of the indices (Colless's index I(c) and Shao and Sokal's Nmacr;) show reasonable performance throughout, but another (Shao and Sokal's B(2)) is never indicated to be a preferred method. Two tests that do not require completely resolved phylogenies, mean I' and mean I'(10), have reasonable power.

Biological Evolution↗