Results for “vsiRNA”

PubMed2025

Small interfering RNAs generated from the terminal panhandle structure of negative-strand RNA virus promote viral infection.

Virus-derived small interfering RNAs (vsiRNAs) have been widely recognized to play an antiviral immunity role. However, it is unclear whether vsiRNAs can also play a positive role in viral infection. Here, we characterized three highly abundant vsiRNAs mapped to the genomic termini of rice stripe virus (RSV), a negative-strand RNA virus transmitted by insect vectors. The three vsiRNAs shared 11 nucleotides due to the conservative genomic termini and were likely generated from viral terminal panhandle structure, depending on both Dicer1 and Dicer2 in insects. In addition to targeting viral RNAs in a miRNA-like manner, the three vsiRNAs coordinately downregulated the expression of DOPA decarboxylase, thereby suppressing the prophenoloxidase immune reaction in insect vectors. In vsiRNA-silenced transgenic rice, the viral titer significantly decreased, indicating that these vsiRNAs promote RSV replication in rice. This study elucidates a unique function of vsiRNAs derived from the conserved panhandle structure of negative-strand RNA viruses in enhancing viral infection.

RNA, Small Interfering↗

PubMed2026

A small viral protein suppresses immune amplification by two distinct mechanisms.

Diverse viral suppressors of RNA interference (RNAi) and RNA silencing (VSRs) interact directly with core protein and/or RNA components of the host RNAi pathway. However, the specific counter-defense function of any VSR biochemical activity is fully validated only when it is shown as essential for viral infection in the wild-type but not mutant hosts defective in antiviral RNAi. Here, we investigated the role of VSR activities for direct binding to small-interfering RNA duplexes (siRNA), long double-stranded RNA (dsRNA), or RNA-dependent RNA polymerase 1 (RDR1) during plant infection by wild-type and mutant cucumber mosaic virus (CMV), a positive-strand RNA virus expressing the 110-residue 2b protein as its VSR. We demonstrate that a C-terminally truncated 2b mutant (2b1-93) active in direct binding to siRNA and dsRNA, but not RDR1, was able to suppress the amplification of virus-derived siRNAs (vsiRNA) and antiviral RNAi mediated by RDR6, but not RDR1. By contrast, an N-terminally truncated 2b mutant (2b18-110) inactive in direct binding to siRNA or dsRNA was able to suppress vsiRNA amplification and antiviral RNAi mediated by RDR1, but not RDR6, and was less effective to promote systemic CMV infection and disease development than 2b1-93. Together, our results show that whereas RDR1 suppression requires direct binding of VSR-2b to RDR1, but not siRNA or dsRNA, RDR6 suppression depends on direct binding to siRNA and dsRNA, but not RDR1. Therefore, CMV, through its VSR-2b, suppresses two parallel vsiRNA amplification pathways by distinct molecular mechanisms, and this unique property may account for the unusually wide host range of CMV.IMPORTANCEHost amplification of antiviral immunity is essential for robust control of viral infections. However, little is known about the mechanisms that viruses have evolved to suppress immune amplification in plants. Here, we characterized whole plant infection by cucumber mosaic virus (CMV) with its viral suppressor of RNA interference (RNAi) mutated to become inactive in direct binding to small-interfering RNA duplexes (siRNA), long double-stranded RNA (dsRNA), or RNA-dependent RNA polymerase 1 (RDR1). We demonstrate maximal suppression of both RDR1- and RDR6-mediated antiviral RNAi amplification by the CMV 2b protein, a viral suppressor of RNAi (VSR). Notably, whereas RDR1 suppression requires direct binding of 2b to RDR1 but not siRNA or dsRNA, RDR6 suppression depends on direct binding to siRNA and dsRNA, but not RDR1. Our findings reveal a novel counter-defense strategy evolved by a wide host range positive-strand RNA virus to suppress two pathways of immune amplification by distinct mechanisms.

Cucumovirus↗