SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “vasospastic angina”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

SourceResearch connectionFrom yearThrough year

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

6 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2026

Comprehensive assessment of vasospastic angina using coronary computed tomography angiography: synergistic value of the presence of myocardial bridge, perivascular inflammation, and myocardial extracellular volume fraction.

AIMS: Coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) has evolved beyond anatomical assessment to include sophisticated tissue characterization. While an elevated perivascular fat attenuation index around the right coronary artery (FAI-RCA) is known to reflect coronary inflammation in vasospastic angina (VSA), recurrent vasospasms may also induce chronic subclinical myocardial injury and subsequent remodelling, potentially associated with an increased myocardial extracellular volume fraction (ECV). However, the diagnostic integration of ECV and FAI-RCA for identifying VSA in patients with angina with non-obstructive coronary arteries (ANOCA) remains to be elucidated. METHODS AND RESULTS: This study included consecutive ANOCA patients who underwent CCTA with a dedicated ECV protocol, followed by an invasive spasm provocation test. Comprehensive CCTA analysis quantified both FAI-RCA and the transmural ECV gradient (the difference between endocardial and epicardial ECV: ECVEndo - ECVEpi). Of the 100 patients analysed (mean age: 65.3 ± 11.8 years; 55% male), 27 were diagnosed with VSA. Multivariable logistic regression analysis identified transmural ECV gradient [odds ratio (OR): 1.12, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.01-1.25], presence of myocardial bridging (MB) (OR: 3.49, 95% CI: 1.25-9.74), and high FAI-RCA (> -70.95 Hounsfield units [HU]) (OR: 5.79, 95% CI: 2.06-16.30) as significant independent predictors of VSA (all P < 0.05). Notably, the integration of transmural ECV gradient provided incremental diagnostic value beyond FAI-RCA and MB, as assessed by the Net Reclassification Improvement and Integrated Discrimination Improvement. CONCLUSION: A multi-parametric CCTA approach potentially identifies patients at high risk for VSA. The significant association of the transmural ECV gradient with VSA suggests that myocardial remodelling imaging provides a novel diagnostic window into the cumulative myocardial impact of vasospasm, independent of active adipose tissue inflammation and the presence of MB.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

International study of coronary microvascular angina (iCorMicA): A registry-based diagnostic study and nested randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: Angina is a debilitating condition caused by coronary artery disease and microvascular dysfunction. Following coronary angiography angina and no obstructive coronary arteries is a common outcome, and women are disproportionately affected. The objectives are first, to assess causes of angina in patients undergoing invasive management; and second, to assess effects of coronary function test-guided management on clinical outcomes. METHODS: This is an international, multicenter, prospective, registry-based study and nested, randomized, controlled, triple-blind, and endpoint trial. Participants, community care providers, and outcomes assessors are masked. Consented participants enter the registry. Participants without obstructive coronary artery disease (luminal stenosis <50%, or fractional flow reserve >0.80) are eligible for randomization. Index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR; abnormal ≥25) and coronary flow reserve (CFR; abnormal <2.0; gray zone 2.0-2.5) are measured by bolus thermodilution, and results are disclosed (intervention) or not (control group) to the attending cardiologist. RESULTS: The primary outcome of the registry is the Seattle Angina Questionnaire summary score at baseline described by coronary artery disease status. Secondary outcomes include the prevalence of obstructive coronary artery disease, patient reported outcome measures and clinical outcomes. The primary outcome of the randomized trial is the within-individual change in Seattle Angina Questionnaire summary score at 12-months from baseline. Secondary outcomes include safety, diagnostic accuracy, patient reported outcome measures for quality of life, physical and psychological function, cardiovascular risk, clinical outcomes, health economics and mechanistic biomarkers. The first patient was screened on December 18, 2020 and the last patient was enrolled on June 30, 2026. Forty sites were included in the United Kingdom (n = 35), Republic of Ireland (n = 2), Holland (n = 2), and Poland (n = 1). In total, 1,483 participants were enrolled into the registry of whom 1,047 were randomized and 386 were not randomized (registry-only). CONCLUSION: This international, registry-based clinical trial will provide novel evidence on the natural history of angina and stratified therapy for angina with no obstructive coronary arteries. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04674449. UNIQUE IDENTIFIER: NCT04674449.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Combined Effects of Nicorandil and Enhanced External Counterpulsation on Coronary Microcirculation and Exercise Capacity in Patients With Coronary Slow Flow Phenomenon: A Randomized, Controlled, 3-Arm Trial.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the combined efficacy and safety of combined nicorandil and enhanced external counterpulsation (EECP) therapy compared with respective monotherapies in patients with coronary slow flow phenomenon (CSFP). METHODS: In this prospective, randomized, 3-arm clinical trial, 309 patients with angiographically defined CSFP based on corrected TIMI frame count were assigned (1:1:1) to the Nicorandil group (N group, n = 103), the EECP group (E group, n = 103), or the Combined therapy group (N+E group, n = 103). The trial was prospectively registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT07534410). IMR and CFR were measured to characterize coronary microvascular physiological status and treatment response. The primary endpoint was corrected TFC at 6 months. Key secondary endpoints included invasive physiological indices (IMR and CFR), Seattle Angina Questionnaire scores, 6-minute walk test (6MWT) distance, peak oxygen uptake via cardiopulmonary exercise testing, and the 12-month rate of re-hospitalization due to recurrent angina. FINDINGS: At 6 months, the N+E group demonstrated superior improvement in coronary hemodynamics compared to the N and E monotherapy groups, with significantly lower TFC (30.4 ± 3.5 vs 38.2 ± 3.8 and 37.5 ± 4.0, respectively; P < 0.001) and IMR (21.2 ± 2.8 vs 28.4 ± 3.2 and 27.6 ± 3.5, respectively; P < 0.001). Clinical symptoms and functional capacity showed the most substantial gains in the N+E group, with significantly higher Seattle Angina Questionnaire angina frequency scores (87.5 ± 8.8) and 6MWT distances (506.8 ± 41.8 m) compared to monotherapy groups (all P < 0.001). Furthermore, peak oxygen uptake in the N+E group increased to 23.5 ± 2.6 mL/kg/min, significantly outperforming the N and E groups (P < 0.001). During the 12-month follow-up, the observed rate of re-hospitalization due to recurrent angina was lower in the N+E group (5.8%) than in the N group (17.5%, P = 0.017), although this clinical outcome should be interpreted cautiously because the trial was powered primarily for physiological endpoints. No significant differences were observed in the incidence of adverse reactions among the 3 groups (P = 0.954). IMPLICATIONS: For patients with CSFP, the combination of Nicorandil and EECP improved coronary microvascular function, anginal symptoms, and objective exercise tolerance more effectively than either active monotherapy. The lower observed rate of angina-related re-hospitalization suggests a potential clinical benefit, but this finding should be considered exploratory and requires confirmation in trials adequately powered for clinical outcomes.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Role of routine surveillance stress testing in patients with or without imaging-guided or physiology-guided PCI.

OBJECTIVE: The optimal follow-up strategy for high-risk patients who underwent imaging-guided or physiology-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remains uncertain. We investigated whether routine surveillance stress testing after PCI provides clinical benefit when the procedure is guided by intravascular ultrasonography (IVUS) or fractional flow reserve (FFR). METHODS: In the Pragmatic Trial Comparing Symptom-Oriented vs Routine Stress Testing in High-Risk Patients Undergoing PCI randomised trial, 1706 high-risk patients who underwent PCI were assigned to either routine functional testing at 1 year or standard care alone. In this prespecified subgroup analysis, patients were subsequently categorised according to whether IVUS or FFR was used at the index procedure. The primary outcome was a composite of death, myocardial infarction or hospitalisation for unstable angina over 2 years. RESULTS: Among the randomised population, 74% underwent IVUS-guided intervention and 36% underwent FFR-guided intervention. At 2 years, rates of the primary outcome were similar between routine testing and standard care both in patients treated with IVUS guidance (5.3% vs 6.7%; HR 0.79; 95% CI 0.50 to 1.24) and without IVUS guidance (5.7% vs 3.8%; HR 1.52; 95% CI 0.63 to 3.68; interaction p=0.21). Comparable results were observed in patients with FFR guidance (2.6% vs 3.9%; HR 0.65; 95% CI 0.26 to 1.58) and without FFR guidance (7.0% vs 7.1%; HR 0.99; 95% CI 0.63 to 1.55; interaction p=0.59). Routine functional testing was consistently associated with higher use of invasive coronary angiography and repeat revascularisation, without improvement in clinical outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Among high-risk patients who underwent PCI, routine surveillance stress testing did not reduce the risk of death, myocardial infarction or unstable angina, regardless of the use of IVUS or FFR at the index procedure. Routine functional testing increased downstream invasive procedures without clinical benefit. These findings support guideline recommendations against routine surveillance testing after PCI. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03217877.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Excimer laser angioplasty for acute coronary occlusion: a stratified meta-analysis of efficacy against aspiration thrombectomy and conventional PCI.

Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) achieves epicardial reperfusion in most STEMI patients, yet microvascular obstruction persists in up to 60% of patients. Excimer laser coronary angioplasty (ELCA) vaporizes thrombus in situ and may reduce distal embolization, but the evidence base has not been systematically synthesized. This systematic review and meta-analysis (PROSPERO CRD420261422463) included comparative studies of adjunctive ELCA versus aspiration thrombectomy (Stratum A) or PCI alone (Stratum B) in acute coronary occlusion. Primary outcomes were final TIMI-3 flow and myocardial blush grade (MBG) 3; secondary outcomes were short-term mortality, MACCE, and slow-flow/no-reflow. A random-effects model with Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman confidence intervals was applied to all outcomes. Certainty was assessed with GRADE. Ten studies (1 RCT, 9 observational) were included, from a total enrolled population exceeding 3,500. In Stratum A, no outcome reached significance: MBG-3 (OR 3.57, 95% CI 0.07-185.10), mortality (OR 0.31, 0.02-4.04), MACCE (OR 0.22, 0.04-1.26), TIMI-3 flow (OR 1.58, 0.67-3.75) and slow-flow/no-reflow (OR 0.78, 0.22-2.78). In Stratum B, using each study's propensity-matched data, no outcome differed significantly (TIMI-3 OR 0.88, 0.38-2.03; MBG-3 OR 1.06, 0.13-8.43; slow-flow/no-reflow OR 0.93, 0.29-3.02; mortality OR 0.44, 0.05-3.80). Composite endpoints were not pooled across incompatible follow-up horizons, and all outcomes were of very low certainty. Adjunctive ELCA-containing strategies during primary PCI were not associated with improved angiographic or short-term clinical outcomes against either comparator. Multicenter randomized trials are required before recommending clinical adoption.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Antegrade dissection and re-entry vs retrograde strategy in chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention: Rationale and design of the ADRENALINE randomized study.

RATIONALE: While antegrade wiring (AW) is the most common initial strategy for chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), difficult CTO lesions frequently require either antegrade dissection and re-entry (ADR) or a retrograde strategy. Comparative data between ADR and the retrograde approach remain limited. DESIGN: The Antegrade Dissection vs Retrograde re-ENtry And Load of Interventionalist Effort (ADRENALINE) is a prospective, multicenter randomized study with a superiority design. It is planned to enroll 121 patients with difficult coronary CTO (J-CTO score ≥2) referred for CTO-PCI in accordance with the hybrid algorithm. Subjects undergoing successful AW will be included in the observational arm. Patients with failed or unattempted AW will be randomized 1:1 to ADR or retrograde CTO crossing strategy (n = 74). All patients will undergo pre- and postprocedural laboratory testing (including cardiac troponin T and creatine kinase-MB), cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) for late gadolinium enhancement, and health status assessment by the Seattle Angina Questionnaire and the Rose Dyspnea Scale. The co-primary endpoints are total procedure time and successful guidewire crossing. Additionally, the relationship between different recanalization strategies and stress among interventional cardiologists will be explored. CONCLUSION: ADRENALINE is the first randomized study of ADR vs retrograde strategy for difficult CTO PCI, assessing procedural outcomes, CMR-detected myocardial infarction, and 3-month quality of life. ENROLMENT STATUS: The first patient was enrolled on July 29, 2025. As of June 14, 2026, 45 patients (26 randomized, 19 observational) of the planned 121 patients have been enrolled. TRIALS REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov: Identifier, NCT06878729.

Humans↗