Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “transformer base editor”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

8 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2026

Engineered Transformer Base Editor with Enhanced Editing Efficiency.

Canonical cytosine base editors (CBEs) achieve precise C-to-T conversions without inducing DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs), yet their clinical potential remains hampered by substantial off-target (OT) mutations. The recently developed transformer base editor (tBE) significantly reduces both genomic and transcriptomic OT mutations by using a cleavable deoxycytidine deaminase inhibitor (dCDI) domain. However, the modest base editing efficiency limits its broader applications. Here, through rational deaminase engineering and fusion of a uracil DNA glycosylase inhibitor (UGI) domain, we developed the engineered tBE (etBE). The etBE exhibited substantially enhanced editing efficiencies compared with the parental tBE (up to 35.11-fold improvement), while maintaining high editing fidelity and background levels of OT mutations. As a therapeutic proof-of-concept, dual adeno-associated virus (AAV)-mediated delivery of etBE targeting proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9), a well-established therapeutic target for cardiovascular diseases, was evaluated in a humanized mouse model. The treatment achieved efficient in vivo base editing (up to 35.13%), resulting in substantial reductions in plasma PCSK9 protein (24%) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels (33%), while inducing only minimal OT mutations. Collectively, etBE represents a highly efficient and specific base editing platform with enormous potential for both basic research and clinical applications.

CRISPR‐Cas9↗
PubMed2025

Bacterial directed evolution of CRISPR base editors.

Base editing and other precision editing agents have transformed the utility and therapeutic potential of CRISPR-based genome editing. While some native enzymes edit efficiently with their nature-derived function, many enzymes require rational engineering or directed evolution to enhance the compatibility with mammalian cell genome editing. While many methods of engineering and directed evolution exist, plate-based discrete evolution offers an ideal balance between ease of use and engineering power. Here, we describe a detailed method for the bacterial directed evolution of CRISPR base editors that compounds technical ease with flexibility of application.

Gene Editing↗
PubMed2025

Transgene-free genome editing in citrus and poplar trees using positive and negative selection markers.

Transgene-free genome editing of the gene of interest in citrus and poplar has been achieved by co-editing the ALS gene via transient transgene expression of an efficient cytosine base editor. CRISPR-Cas genome editing systems have been widely used in plants. However, such genome-edited plants are nearly always transgenic in the first generation when Agrobacterium-mediated transformation is used. Transgene-free genome-edited plants are valuable for genetic analysis and breeding as well as simplifying regulatory approval. It can be challenging to generate transgene-free genome-edited plants in vegetatively propagated or perennial plants. To advance transgene-free genome editing in citrus and poplar, we investigated a co-editing strategy using an efficient cytosine base editor (CBE) to edit the ALS gene to confer herbicide resistance combined with transient transgene expression and potential mobile RNA-based movement of CBE transcripts to neighboring, non-transgenic cells. An FCY-UPP based cytotoxin system was used to select non-transgenic plants that survive after culturing on 5-FC containing medium. While the editing efficiency is higher in poplar than in citrus, our results show that the CBE-based co-editing strategy works in both citrus and poplar, albeit with low efficiency for biallelic edits. Unexpectedly, the addition of the TLS mobile RNA sequence reduced genome editing efficiency in both transgenic and non-transgenic plants. Although a small fraction of escaping plants is detected in both positive and negative selection processes, our data demonstrate a promising approach for generating transgene-free base-edited plants.

Populus↗
PubMed2026

Efficient CRISPR/Cas-SF01 genome editing tools with high editing efficiency in allotetraploid oilseed rape.

CRISPR (Clustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats)-Cas9 has been widely utilized for plant genome editing, but the protospacer adjacent motif (PAM) requirement limits its editing scope. CRISPR/Cas12i3 belongs to the type-VI Cas system that has gained extensive attention due to its smaller size and less restricted canonical TTN PAM sequence. In this study, we explored the newly developed Cas-SF01 system (Cas12i3 variant) for genome editing in oilseed rape. We established an efficient protoplast transformation system in oilseed rape to compare editing efficiency between Cas-SF01 and Cas9. Cas-SF01 shows cleavage activities at the tested 5'-TTN-3' PAM sites with editing outcomes sharing considerable similarities with the CRISPR-Cas9 system in protoplast. Cas-SF01 also induces high efficiency mutagenesis for multiple target sites in stable transformed oilseed rape lines, generating mutants with multilocular silique and male sterile phenotypes. Furthermore, Cas-SF01-derived cytosine base editors (CBEs) were developed to produce targeted C-to-T base edits. Compared to SpCas9, Cas-SF01 has an expanded PAM range and effectively recognizes TTN PAMs, which has substantially broadened the scope of editable sites within the rapeseed genome. No mutations were identified at the putative off-target sites among the edited plants. This study developed a robust, first-of-its-kind Cas12 system in the allotetraploid Brassica napus, expanding the scope of editing and enriching genome-editing toolkits for biological research and genetic improvement.

Brassica napus↗
PubMed2026

Gene therapy for genodermatoses at the crossroads of innovation and clinical translation.

Inherited genodermatoses are a heterogeneous group of rare monogenic disorders. Among these, epidermolysis bullosa (EB) and ichthyoses represent paradigmatic disorders characterized by severe skin fragility and hyperkeratosis, respectively, and impaired barrier function, often with profound effects on quality of life and systemic health. Current management remains largely palliative, underscoring the urgent need for disease-modifying therapies. Over the past 2 decades, advances in epithelial stem cell biology, vector engineering and genome editing technologies have transformed the therapeutic landscape for genodermatoses. Ex vivo gene therapy has provided the first proof that genetically corrected epidermal stem cells can achieve long-term tissue regeneration in EB skin patients, establishing a new paradigm for regenerative medicine. In parallel, the emergence of programmable genome engineering platforms, including CRISPR/Cas nucleases, base editors and prime editors, have enabled increasingly precise strategies for mutation-specific correction in both recessive and dominant disorders. Furthermore, the development of in vivo topical approaches is expanding the possibility of directly targeting the skin. Despite these advances, substantial translational barriers continue to limit broad clinical implementation. Efficient and durable targeting of epidermal stem cells within a highly regenerative tissue, together with safe delivery across the skin barrier, stringent control of off-target activity, scalable manufacturing and demonstration of long-term safety, remain major challenges for the clinical translation of these approaches. In this Review, we discuss the current state of gene therapy for genodermatoses, highlighting key clinical milestones, emerging genome editing technologies and next-generation delivery systems. We further examine the biological and regulatory challenges that need to be overcome to bridge the gap between experimental innovation and clinically accessible therapies for patients with inherited skin diseases.

epidermolysis bullosa (EB)↗
PubMed2026

Unraveling the Mystery of Pain: A Unique Clinical Encounter and Case Report.

BACKGROUND: The Clinical Pharmacogenetics Implementation Consortium published an updated guideline for opioids and CYP2D6, OPRM1, and COMT in December 2020. These guidelines include recommendations to avoid key opioids in patients who are ultrarapid or poor metabolizers of CYP2D6 to avoid toxicity and optimize efficacy. CASE REPORT: An older woman encountered a letter to the editor in a family magazine regarding genomically based responses to opioids. She reached out for more information and assistance, attesting to continued lack of analgesia to opioids prescribed during occasions of severe pain over the course of many years. A pharmacogenomic analysis proved to be the key to solving her mystery. CONCLUSION: Pharmacogenomic results may provide life-altering information transforming a patient's perspective on health care. Personalized medicine may be a key component in providing objective evidence for opioid treatment efficacy. There is a critical need for both provider and patient education to increase awareness of pharmacogenomics and how it can be applied to effective pharmacotherapy. Research is needed to explore appropriate, effective educational methods.

Humans↗
PubMed2025

CRISPRoff epigenome editing for programmable gene silencing in human cell lines and primary T cells.

The advent of CRISPR-based technologies has enabled the rapid advancement of programmable gene manipulation in cells, tissues, and whole organisms. An emerging platform for targeted gene perturbation is epigenetic editing, the direct editing of chemical modifications on DNA and histones that ultimately results in repression or activation of the targeted gene. In contrast to CRISPR nucleases, epigenetic editors modulate gene expression without inducing DNA breaks or altering the genomic sequence of host cells. Recently, we developed the CRISPRoff epigenetic editing technology that simultaneously establishes DNA methylation and repressive histone modifications at targeted gene promoters. Transient expression of CRISPRoff and the accompanying single guide RNAs in mammalian cells results in transcriptional repression of targeted genes that is memorized heritably by cells through cell division and differentiation. Here, we describe our protocol for the delivery of CRISPRoff through plasmid DNA transfection, as well as the delivery of CRISPRoff mRNA, into transformed human cell lines and primary immune cells. We also provide guidance on evaluating target gene silencing and highlight key considerations when utilizing CRISPRoff for gene perturbations. Our protocols are broadly applicable to other CRISPR-based epigenetic editing technologies, as programmable genome manipulation tools continue to evolve rapidly.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Base editing for precision therapeutics.

Base editing (BE), the precise installation of single-nucleotide changes in DNA or RNA without inducing double-strand breaks, holds substantial therapeutic promise for correcting single-nucleotide variants, which constitute more than half of the known pathogenic genetic variants. Recent advances have improved base editor specificity, efficiency, and delivery, enabling clinically oriented procedures. Clinically, BE has shown early success or strong translational promise in sickle cell disease, β-thalassemia, leukemia (via CAR T and epitope engineering), hypercholesterolemia (PCSK9 and ANGPTL3), alpha-1-antitrypsin deficiency, and glycogen storage disease type Ia. Key remaining challenges include bystander editing within the activity window, residual off-target DNA and RNA editing, delivery constraints (payload size, tissue targeting, and redosing limits), immunogenicity, and the need for durable long-term safety evidence across relevant cell types and disease contexts. Continued technological refinements, careful preclinical validation, and rigorous clinical assessment will be essential to fully realize BE's transformative potential in precision medicine.

Humans↗