Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “speech outcome”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Early cleft palate repair and speech outcome.

Speech production and age at palatal repair were investigated in 80 cleft palate children. Children whose palates were repaired prior to the onset of speech production demonstrated significantly better speech than those whose palates were repaired between 12 and 27 months of age. The supposition that earlier palatal repair results in more normal speech development was, in fact, demonstrated in these cases. Rather than using chronologic age alone as the deciding factor in determining timing of initial palatal repair, the stage of each child's phonemic development should be considered if maximum speech potential is to be achieved and if speech development is to parallel normal noncleft peers. Determining this stage of development through early speech and language evaluations, beginning at 6 months of age, thus becomes an essential component in the habilitation of children with cleft palate. Continued research is needed to ensure against giving the obtainment of early speech normalcy disproportionate emphasis over craniofacial growth considerations. To this end, continued cooperative research between surgeons and speech pathologists is imperative in order to base these important decisions on substantiated findings.

Child, Preschool↗

Speech outcomes of a prolonged-speech treatment for stuttering.

It has been shown that people who stutter can speak with greatly reduced stuttering after treatments that use variations of Goldiamond's (1965) prolonged-speech (PS). However, outcome research to date has not taken account of several important issues. In particular, speech outcome measures in that research have been insufficient to show that lasting relief from stuttering has been achieved by clients outside the clinic for meaningful periods. The present study used extensive speech outcome measures across a variety of situations in evaluating the outcome of an intensive PS treatment (Ingham, 1987). The speech of 12 clients in this treatment was assessed on three occasions prior to treatment and frequently-on eight occasions-after discharge from the residential setting. For 7 clients, a further assessment occurred at 3 years posttreatment. Concurrent dependent measures were percent syllables stuttered, syllables per minute, and speech naturalness. The dependent measures were collected in many speaking situations within and beyond the clinic. Dependent measures were based on speech samples of substantive duration, and covert assessments were included in the study. Detailed data were presented for individual subjects. Results showed that 12 subjects who remained with the entire 2-3-year program achieved zero or near-zero stuttering. The majority of subjects did not show a regression trend in %SS or speech naturalness scores during the posttreatment period, either within or beyond the clinic. Some subjects showed higher posttreatment %SS scores during covert assessment than during overt assessment. Results also showed that stuttering was eliminated without using unusually slow and unnatural speech patterns. This treatment program does not specify a target speech rate range, and many clients maintained stutter-free speech using speech rates that were higher than the range typically specified in intensive PS programs. A significant correlation was found between speech rate and perceived posttreatment speech naturalness.

Adolescent↗

Cleft lip and palate care in the United Kingdom--the Clinical Standards Advisory Group (CSAG) Study. Part 3: speech outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: To summarize speech outcomes in children born with unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) throughout the United Kingdom. DESIGN: Prospective descriptive study on a cross-sectional sample of children. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: Data were collected for 238 5-year-olds (born between April 1, 1989, and March 31, 1991) and 218 12-year-olds (born between April 1, 1982, and March 31, 1984) with complete UCLP. MAIN OUTCOMES: Ratings of intelligibility, nasality, "speech cleft type characteristics" and speech therapy intervention. CONCLUSIONS: Nineteen percent of 5-year-olds and 4% of 12-year-olds were judged to be impossible to understand or just intelligible to strangers. Thirty-four percent of 5-year-olds and 17% of 12-year-olds had at least one serious error of consonant production. Eighteen percent of 5-year-olds and 12-year-olds had consistent hypernasality of mild, moderate, or severe degree. Approximately two-thirds of both age groups had undergone speech therapy.

Child↗

Speech outcome after closure of oronasal fistulas with bone grafts.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this prospective study was to evaluate the outcome of speech after complete closure of oronasal fistulas with bone grafts and to determine the possible relationship between outcome of speech and the size and location of the oronasal fistulas. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Ten unilateral cleft lip and palate patients with postoperative oronasal fistulas, ranging in age from 7 to 14 years, underwent secondary alveolar cleft repair and closure of the oronasal fistulas with an iliac bone graft. All patients underwent videofluoroscopic evaluation of the velopharyngeal valve, audiologic assessment, and speech evaluation (resonance, nasal emission, articulation, intelligibility, and nasalance) preoperatively. The examinations were repeated 3 months postoperatively. RESULTS: Six patients had preoperative velopharyngeal competency (60%). Of the 4 patients with slight to mild velopharyngeal incompetency preoperatively, 2 developed velopharyngeal competency postoperatively. All patients had satisfactory audiologic function preoperatively. Every patient also was intelligible before and after surgery. Eight patients (80%) showed nasal emission before surgery and 7 of these patients improved postoperatively (P <.01). Nine patients had articulation errors before surgery, with no significant improvement postoperatively. Nasalance was significantly improved in selected sequences. All patients had variable levels of nasality preoperatively; 8 showed a significant decrease of nasality postoperatively (P <.002). The results were not related to location or size of the oronasal fistulas. CONCLUSION: A significant improvement in speech is noticeable after closure of oronasal fistulas. Early oronasal fistula closure might prevent permanent speech distortions acquired by the cleft palate patients at an early age.

Adolescent↗

Speech outcome following treatment in cross-linguistic cleft palate studies: methodological implications.

OBJECTIVE: In cross-linguistic studies of cleft palate speech outcome following treatment, treatment is the independent variable, speech outcome is the dependent variable, and the speakers' language background is a background variable, like sex, age, and cleft type, which must be eliminated. This article focuses on language as a background variable and how it should be treated. The methodological problems are illustrated through a presentation of two cross-linguistic speech outcome studies. CONCLUSION: When speakers of different language background are included in cleft palate studies of speech outcome following treatment, speech outcome data should be based on speech units that are phonetically identical across languages. This affects the make-up of the speech material used in the study. In practice, the requirement of phonetically identical speech units may not be totally met, and detailed information regarding the interaction between the cleft condition and speech sound production is still required to fully understand how the validity of data is affected if this requirement is not met.

Cleft Palate↗

Speech outcomes in isolated cleft palate: impact of cleft extent and additional malformations.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of the study was to study the speech outcome in a series of 5-year-old children born with an isolated cleft palate and compare the speech with that of noncleft children and to study the impact of cleft extent and additional malformation on the speech outcome. DESIGN: A cross-sectional retrospective study. SETTING: A university hospital serving a population of 1.5 million inhabitants. SUBJECTS: Fifty-one patients with an isolated cleft palate; 22 of these had additional malformations. Thirteen noncleft children served as a reference group. INTERVENTIONS: A primary soft palate repair at a mean of 8 months of age and a hard palate closure at a mean age of 4 years and 2 months if the cleft extended into the hard palate. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Perceptual judgment of seven speech variables assessed on a five-point scale by three experienced speech pathologists. RESULTS: The cleft palate group had significantly higher frequency of speech symptoms related to velopharyngeal function than the reference group. There were, however, no significant differences in speech outcome between the subgroup with a nonsyndromic cleft and the reference group. Cleft extent had a significant impact on the variable retracted oral articulation while the presence of additional malformations had a significant impact on several variables related to velopharyngeal function and articulation errors. CONCLUSION: Children with a cleft in the soft palate only, with no additional malformations, had satisfactory speech, while children with a cleft palate accompanied by additional malformations or as a part of a syndrome should be considered to be at risk for speech problems.

Articulation Disorders↗

Speech outcomes in patients rehabilitated with maxillary obturator prostheses after maxillectomy: a prospective study.

PURPOSE: Speech outcome measurements are valuable in guiding treatment and determining the effectiveness of rehabilitation with a maxillary obturator prosthesis in individuals with palatal resection. Although speech outcome data exist in the literature for such patients, relatively few reports have used clinical tools designed to measure the acoustic, physiologic, and perceptual bases of speech. This investigation reports these measures for individuals rehabilitated with a maxillary obturator. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Speech measurements were collected prospectively at three clinical visit times (preoperative, postresection without an obturator, and with a definitive obturator) for 12 patients assigned to three groups based on the extent of their resection (< half the hard palate, > or = half the hard palate, hard and soft palates). Acoustic data were obtained with the Nasometer, aeromechanical data were collected with the PERCI-SARS, and perceptual ratings of speech intelligibility were obtained through listener analysis. RESULTS: Significant differences existed among the three treatments for all dependent variables and revealed that speech without an obturator is significantly different from the preoperative state, while speech with an obturator does not differ significantly from preoperative function. Individuals with soft palate involvement exhibited significantly poorer nasalance values than individuals with involvement of the hard palate only. CONCLUSION: Rehabilitation with a maxillary obturator is successful in restoring preoperative speech function. Rehabilitation of individuals with involvement of the soft palate may be more challenging.

Adolescent↗

Sphincter pharyngoplasty: speech outcome and complications.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the speech outcomes and complications in children who had undergone sphincter pharyngoplasty (SP) for management of velopharyngeal insufficiency (VPI). STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. METHODS: Charts from patients who had sphincter pharyngoplasty between January 1993 and June 1996 were reviewed. Syndrome diagnosis and presence of repaired cleft palate were reviewed. Preoperative speech assessment, videofluoroscopic and nasopharyngoscopic evaluations, age at time of surgery, and postoperative speech assessments were reviewed for all patients. Postoperative videofluoroscopy and nasopharyngoscopy were performed for those patients who had persistent VPI. Obstructive sleep symptoms were also assessed. RESULTS: Thirty patients were identified; six patients had no follow-up evaluation, leaving 24 patients included in this study. Average follow-up was 11.7 months (range, 2-35 mo). Velocardiofacial syndrome (VCFS) was the most commonly identified syndrome. Postoperatively, 15 of 24 patients (62.5%) had complete resolution of their VPI; five of 24 (20.8%) had significant improvement; one of 24 (4.2%) had minimal to no change; and three of 24 (12.5%) were hyponasal. Of the six patients with some degree of persistent VPI, three underwent revision surgery. All three patients had complete resolution of their VPI after revision surgery, resulting in an overall success rate of 18 of 24 (75%). CONCLUSIONS: Sphincter pharyngoplasty has wide application in the management of children with VPI, including those with VCFS. The procedure is readily modified to accommodate an individual patient's needs as determined by preoperative VPI evaluation. A modification of the procedure is described to minimize the risk of postoperative airway obstruction and hyponasality, both regarded as airway complications of sphincter pharyngoplasty.

Child↗

The long-term speech outcome in Flemish young adults after two different types of palatoplasty.

OBJECTIVE: The success of cleft palate surgery is specifically determined by the subsequent speech characteristics. There are several types of surgical techniques to repair the palate. The surgeon chooses his or her own technique according to the principles (s)he have established based on experience. The main purpose of this study is to determine and to compare the long-term speech outcome (18 years after surgery) regarding overall intelligibility, articulation, resonance, and voice after one-stage Wardill-Kilner palatoplasty or two-stage Furlow palatoplasty. The authors hypothesized that a decreased overall intelligibility, more compensatory articulation disorders, higher nasalance values and more nasality disorders would occur in the two-stage Furlow palatoplasty. Moreover, an increased risk for dysphonic symptoms, caused by the more intensive vocal tract activities, were expected in subjects with higher nasalance scores. An additional objective of this study was to compare the speech and voice characteristics with the age related normative data. Significant differences between the resonance and voice characteristics of the two techniques of palatoplasty and the normative data were hypothesized. METHODS: Objective as well as subjective assessment techniques were used. The evaluation of the articulation included a phonetic inventory and a relational analysis in which the consonant and vowel productions were compared with target productions and analyzed for error types at the segmental level. The speech samples were perceptually judged for intelligibility and nasality. The Nasometer was used for the objective measurement of the nasalance values. The assessment of the voice included a perceptual evaluation and a determination of the Dysphonia Severity Index. RESULTS: The subjects who received a two-stage Furlow palatoplasty showed statistically more hypernasality and higher nasalance scores in comparison with the one-stage Wardill-Kilner palatoplasty. No major differences regarding articulation and voice characteristics were found. As expected, significant differences were found between the speech intelligibility and resonance characteristics in subjects who received a palatoplasty and the normative data. CONCLUSION: Since the subjects who received a one-stage Wardill-Kilner palatoplasty had a significantly better speech outcome it was decided in the craniofacial team of the University Hospital of Ghent that a two-stage palatoplasty would no longer be performed.

Adolescent↗

Speech outcome and maxillary growth in patients with unilateral complete cleft lip/palate operated on at 6 versus 12 months of age.

A prospective study of speech outcome and maxillofacial growth was carried out in cleft palate patients. Seventy-six cleft palate patients were randomly selected for the study group; 41 patients were operated on at 12 months of age, and 35 patients were operated on at 6 months of age. All patients were followed until they were 4 years of age. All patients underwent a complete speech evaluation, videonasopharyngoscopy, videofluoroscopy, and maxillofacial assessment. The rate of velopharyngeal insufficiency did not differ between the two groups (17 to 19 percent; p > 0.05). However, phonologic development was significantly better (p < 0.05) in the patients operated on at 6 months of age. Furthermore, none of the patients operated on at 6 months of age showed compensatory articulation disorder. In contrast, 62 percent of the patients with postoperative velopharyngeal insufficiency operated on at 12 months of age showed compensatory articulation disorder (p < 0.05). Maxillofacial assessment showed that there were non-significant differences (p > 0.05) in maxillofacial growth in both groups of patients. All patients showed similar degrees of maxillary collapse (p > 0.05). The results of this study suggest that cleft palate repair performed at 6 months of age significantly enhances speech outcome and prevents compensatory articulation disorder.

Articulation Disorders↗

Functional speech outcomes after laryngectomy and pharyngolaryngectomy.

OBJECTIVE: To compare and contrast functional speech outcomes of patients having undergone total laryngectomy and pharyngolaryngectomy who use tracheoesophageal speech as their primary mode of communication. DESIGN: Group comparison design. SETTING: Adult acute tertiary care hospital. PATIENTS: Thirty patients who underwent total laryngectomy and 13 who underwent pharyngolaryngectomy with free jejunal interposition reconstruction. All patients used tracheoesophageal speech. INTERVENTION: Group comparisons across measures of speech intelligibility, voice quality, tracheoesophageal speech use, voice satisfaction and levels of perceived voice disability, handicap, and well-being/distress. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The existence of any significant differences between the 2 groups on measures of intelligibility, voice quality, tracheoesophageal speech use, and voice satisfaction and levels of voice disability, handicap, and well-being/distress. RESULTS: Statistical comparisons confirmed reduced functional intelligibility (P<.05), reduced vocal quality (P<.01), and higher levels of disability (P<.05) in the pharyngolaryngectomy group. However, no significant difference was observed between the proportion of patients classified as "successful" tracheoesophageal speech users in either group. Low levels of handicap and high levels of patient well-being were recorded in both groups. CONCLUSION: Despite the perceptual differences in voice quality and intelligibility observed between the 2 groups, tracheoesophageal speech that is functional, effective, and perceived by the patients as satisfactory can be achieved after total laryngectomy and pharyngolaryngectomy with free jejunal interposition reconstruction.

Aged↗

Maxillary obturators: the relationship between patient satisfaction and speech outcome.

BACKGROUND: Patient satisfaction with a maxillary obturator has been studied in relation to extent of surgical defect, sociodemographic characteristics, scores on mental health inventories, and psychosocial adjustment to illness scales. However, review of the literature reveals limited study of the relationship between patient satisfaction with an obturator and clinical speech outcome measures. The purpose of this study is to relate patient satisfaction scores obtained by questionnaire with those obtained by means of clinical speech measurements. METHODS: Acoustical, aeromechanical, and perceptual measurements of speech were collected for 20 patients after receiving a definitive obturator. Patient satisfaction with their obturator was later measured with the Obturator Functioning Scale (OFS). RESULTS: Results reveal that poorer aeromechanical speech results were associated with patient-reported avoidance of social events, whereas lower speech intelligibility outcomes were related to overall poorer perception of speech function on the OFS. Several background patient characteristics were significantly related to several responses on the OFS and to the aeromechanical assessment outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Results from instrumental assessments of speech seem to be informative regarding not only speech outcome but also a patient's satisfaction with the obturator. Consideration of background patient characteristics is important when interpreting both clinically obtained and patient-perceived outcomes.

Adolescent↗

Influence of age at implantation and of residual hearing on speech outcome measures after cochlear implantation: binary partitioning analysis.

The goal of this study was to evaluate speech understanding outcomes in prelingually deaf children who use a cochlear implant device. Specifically, we discuss investigations on 2 prognostic variables--age at implantation and degree of residual hearing--and use a novel method: binary partitioning analysis. Our outcome measures are standard speech perception evaluations, including the Word Intelligibility by Picture Identification (WIPI) test, the Phonetically Balanced-Kindergarten (PBK) test, and the Glendonald Auditory Screening Procedure (GASP). Regarding age at implantation, we definitely showed that growth rates of speech understanding do relate to age at implantation, but not in a simple fashion. We used binary partitioning in an attempt to find the age at implantation that best separates the performances of children with younger versus older ages at implantation. We found that there is no one "critical age"; much appears to depend on the nature and difficulty (eg, whether open- or closed-set) of the test used. Regarding residual hearing, binary partitioning analysis was unable to show that the amount of residual hearing (as shown by preimplantation audiometric data) has any significant bearing on speech outcome measures in congenitally or prelingually deaf children.

Adolescent↗

[Speech outcomes in patients of maxillary reconstruction with free fibula composite flap].

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate speech outcomes in patients of maxillary reconstruction with free fibula composite flap. METHODS: Speech measurements of 20 patients of maxillary reconstruction with free fibula composite flap were collected. Palatopharyngeal valve, the symmetry and movement of soft palate, hypernasality and nasal emission were examined by nasoendoscopy. At the same time the speech intelligibility was measured. RESULTS: No palatopharyngeal valve insufficiency was found and all the soft palates had good symmetry and movement. The average speech intelligibility was 98.4%. CONCLUSIONS: Free fibula composite flap can reconstruct the phonatory structure and support the function of soft palate, which can restorate speech function well. It is a good choice for maxillary reconstruction.

Adult↗

Speech outcome in cleft palate patients with simultaneous primary palatal repair and adenoidectomy.

This study deals with speech outcome after adenoidectomy performed simultaneously with primary palatal repair. Signs of velopharyngeal insufficiency were registered in the speech of 24 children with cleft lip and palate (CLP) or cleft palate only (CP) who underwent adenoidectomy (Group A+), and in 25 C(L)P children who had no adenoidectomy (Group A-). The results indicated that hypernasality occurred significantly more frequently in Group A+ than in Group A-. Audible nasal air emission also tended to occur more frequently in Group A+. The groups did not differ when it came to articulation errors associated with velopharyngeal insufficiency. The clinical implications of these results are discussed.

Adenoidectomy↗

[The effects of otitis media with effusion and hearing loss on the speech outcome after cleft palate surgery].

OBJECTIVE: To find out the exact effect of OME and hearing loss on the speech outcome post palatoplasty in cleft palate patients. METHODS: Otoscopy and tympanometry were performed in 18 cleft palate patients whose ages ranged from 5 to 23 years old and hearing thresholds were also tested before cleft palates repair. All patients were followed up from 3 to 18 months postoperatively. Articulation scores were evaluated and linear correlation analysis was performed between these results and their mean hearing thresholds for air conduction in speech frequencies before the palate closure. The incidences of the OME were compared among the groups with different articulation scores. RESULTS: The postoperative articulation scores correlate negatively (r = -0.504, P = 0.032 < 0.05) to the degrees of hearing loss. But the incidences of OME had no significant differences among the groups with different articulation scores. CONCLUSIONS: The hearing level preoperation is more important than tympanometric data on the foresight of the speech result postoperation in cleft palate patients.

Adolescent↗

Influence of surgeon's experience on speech outcome in cleft lip and palate.

Relation between the number of cases treated and outcome, particularly in low-incidence anomalies, are difficult to identify and rectify. We show clear advantages in speech outcomes for children born with a cleft lip and palate who are operated on by surgeons who do large numbers of these procedures.

Child↗

Speech outcome after surgical treatment for oral and oropharyngeal cancer: a longitudinal assessment of patients reconstructed by a microvascular flap.

BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to analyze speech outcome for patients with advanced oral/oropharyngeal cancer treated with reconstructive surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy. METHODS: Speech tests (communicative suitability, intelligibility, articulation, nasality, and consonant errors) were performed in a control group and in patients before treatment (n = 76), and 6 months (n = 51) and 12 months (n = 42) after treatment. RESULTS: Speech tests were significantly worse for patients before and after treatment compared with the controls. Speech did not improve between 6 and 12 months. After treatment, patients with T3-4 tumors showed a significantly worse score for communicative suitability, intelligibility, and articulation than patients with T2 tumors. No significant differences were found for subsites after treatment, although patients with mobile tongue tumors showed the best results. CONCLUSION: Speech difficulties are significant, and with the knowledge of this study better counseling and vigilance as to speech difficulties may be possible in patients undergoing treatment for oral/oropharyngeal cancer.

Adult↗