Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “reprogramming”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2001

Conservation of methylation reprogramming in mammalian development: aberrant reprogramming in cloned embryos.

Mouse embryos undergo genome-wide methylation reprogramming by demethylation in early preimplantation development, followed by remethylation thereafter. Here we show that genome-wide reprogramming is conserved in several mammalian species and ask whether it also occurs in embryos cloned with the use of highly methylated somatic donor nuclei. Normal bovine, rat, and pig zygotes showed a demethylated paternal genome, suggesting active demethylation. In bovine embryos methylation was further reduced during cleavage up to the eight-cell stage, and this reduction in methylation was followed by de novo methylation by the 16-cell stage. In cloned one-cell embryos there was a reduction in methylation consistent with active demethylation, but no further demethylation occurred subsequently. Instead, de novo methylation and nuclear reorganization of methylation patterns resembling those of differentiated cells occurred precociously in many cloned embryos. Cloned, but not normal, morulae had highly methylated nuclei in all blastomeres that resembled those of the fibroblast donor cells. Our study shows that epigenetic reprogramming occurs aberrantly in most cloned embryos; incomplete reprogramming may contribute to the low efficiency of cloning.

Animals↗
PubMed2006

Targeting cellular memory to reprogram the epigenome, restore potential, and improve somatic cell nuclear transfer.

Successful cloning by somatic cell nuclear transfer (SCNT) is thought to require reprogramming of a somatic nucleus to a state of restored totipotentiality [Dean, W., Santos, F., Reik, W., 2003. Epigenetic programming in early mammalian development and following somatic cell nuclear transfer. Semin. Cell. Dev. Biol. 14, 93-100; Jouneau, A., Renard, J.P., 2003. Reprogramming in nuclear transfer. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 13, 486-491; ]. Though SCNT-induced reprogramming is reminiscent of the reprogramming that occurs after fertilization, reprogramming a differentiated nucleus to an embryonic state is delayed and incomplete in comparison (for review, see ). This is likely due to the existence of an epigenetic-based cellular memory, or program, that serves to regulate global patterns of gene expression, and is the basis of a genome defense mechanism that silences viruses and transposons. The mechanisms of this memory include CpG methylation and modification of histones. Recent evidence by Feng et al. [Feng, Y.-Q., Desprat, R., Fu, H., Olivier, E., Lin, C.M., Lobell, A., Gowda, S.N., Aladjem, M.I., Bouhasira, E.E., 2006. DNA methylation supports intrinsic epigenetic memory in mammalian cells. PLOS Genet. 2, 0461-0470], using a transgenic experimental system, indicates that these marks may be acquired in more than one order and thus, silent heterochromatic structure can be initiated by either methylation of CpG dinucleotides or by histone modifications. In this system, however, CpG methylation appears to differ from histone modifications because it bestows a persistent epigenetic, or cellular, memory. In other words, CpG methylation can independently confer cellular memory, whereas histone modifications appear to be limited in this capacity. Therefore, in the context of genomic reprogramming induced by SCNT, efficient demethylation is likely a key (if not the only) rate-limiting step to improving the efficiency and outcomes of SCNT cloning. This review discusses the possibility of targeting cellular memory, and in particular inducing demethylation of a somatic nucleus prior to nuclear transfer, to enable reprogramming events typically carried out by oocyte factors and thereby improve developmental competence of SCNT-reconstructed embryos. Several recent published reviews of SCNT, cellular reprogramming and genomic demethylation served as valuable sources for the authors and are recommended as supplemental reading. These include the following: Bird, A., 2002. DNA methylation patterns and epigenetic memory. Gen. Dev. 16, 6-21; Grafi, G., 2004. How cells dedifferentiate: a lesson from plants. Dev. Biol. 268, 1-6; Latham, K.E., 2005. Early and delayed aspects of nuclear reprogramming during cloning. Biol. Cell 97, 119-132; Lyko, F., Brown, R., 2005. DNA methyltransferase inhibitors and the development of epigenetic cancer therapies. J.Natl. Cancer Inst. 97, 1498-1506; Morgan, H.D., Santos, F., Green, K., Dean, W., Reik, W., 2005. Epigenetic reprogramming in mammals. Hum. Mol. Gen. 14, R47-R58; Szyf, M., 2005. DNA methylation and demethylation as targets for anticancer therapy. Biochemistry 70, 533-549; Buszczak, M., Spradling, A.C., 2006. Searching chromatin for stem cell identity. Cell 125, 233-236; Gurdon, J.B., 2006. From nuclear transfer to nuclear reprogramming: the reversal of cell differentiation. Annu. Rev. Cell. Dev. Biol. 22, 1-22; Yoo, C.B., Jones, P.A., 2006. Epigenetic therapy of cancer: past, present and future. Nat. Rev. 5, 37-50.

Animals↗
PubMed2004

Nuclear reprogramming of human somatic cells by xenopus egg extract requires BRG1.

Animal cloning by nuclear transplantation in amphibia was demonstrated almost half a century ago and raised the question of the mechanisms and genes involved in nuclear reprogramming. Here, we demonstrate nuclear reprogramming of permeabilized human cells using extracts from Xenopus laevis eggs and early embryos. We show upregulation of pluripotency markers Oct-4 and germ cell alkaline phosphatase (GCAP) in 293T cells and human primary leukocytes. Reprogrammed leukocytes had a limited life span and did not express surface antigens characteristic of pluripotent cells, indicating that reprogramming was incomplete. Reprogramming activity was detected in egg and early embryo extracts until early blastula stage. Late blastula-stage extracts were not only inactive but also inhibitory to reprogramming. Screening for factors required for reprogramming identified the chromatin remodeling ATPase BRG1. Antibody depletion of BRG1 protein or expression of dominant-negative BRG1 abolished the reprogramming ability of amphibian extracts. Conversely, overexpression of BRG1 in Xenopus animal caps extended their competence from blastula to gastrula stage to respond to basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) treatment with induction of the mesodermal marker Xbra. Dissection of the molecular machinery using a simplified assay system may aid in achieving complete nuclear reprogramming of somatic cells for regenerative medicine.

Alkaline Phosphatase↗
PubMed2025

STEMIN transcription factor drives selective chromatin remodeling for gene activation within a relaxed chromatin during reprogramming in the moss Physcomitrium patens.

Land plants exhibit remarkable cellular plasticity, readily reprogramming differentiated cells into stem cells in response to internal and external stimuli. While chromatin remodeling is crucial for cellular reprogramming, its interplay with gene expression during reprogramming into stem cells remains elusive. In the moss Physcomitrium patens, wounding induces reprogramming of leaf cells facing wounded cells to change into chloronema apical stem cells through the activation of the AP2/ERF transcription factor STEMIN. In this study, we employed multimodal single-nuclei RNA and ATAC sequencing to explore the interplay between gene expression and chromatin dynamics during STEMIN-mediated reprogramming. Profiling 20 883 single-nuclei from gametophores, protonemata, and cut leaves, we identified 11 distinct cell types including reprogramming leaf cells. Our analysis revealed that reprogramming leaf cells exhibit a partly relaxed chromatin landscape and STEMIN transcription factors selectively enhance accessibility at specific genomic loci essential for stem cell formation. Thus, our results indicate that wounding initiates a broad chromatin relaxation, creating a permissive environment and specific transcription factors act to refine this permissive state by specifically relaxing chromatin regions critical for reprogramming.

Bryopsida↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Reprogramming mediated by stem cell fusion.

Advances in mammalian cloning prove that somatic nuclei can be reprogrammed to a state of totipotency by transfer into oocytes. An alternative approach to reprogram the somatic genome involves the creation of hybrids between somatic cells and other cells that contain reprogramming activities. Potential fusion partners with reprogramming activities include embryonic stem cells, embryonic germ cells, embryonal carcinoma cells, and even differentiated cells. Recent advances in fusion-mediated reprogramming are discussed from the standpoints of the developmental potency of hybrid cells, genetic and epigenetic correlates of reprogramming, and other aspects involved in the reprogramming process. In addition, the utility of fusion-mediated reprogramming for future cell-based therapies is discussed.

Animals↗
PubMed2001

Epigenetic reprogramming in mammalian development.

DNA methylation is a major epigenetic modification of the genome that regulates crucial aspects of its function. Genomic methylation patterns in somatic differentiated cells are generally stable and heritable. However, in mammals there are at least two developmental periods-in germ cells and in preimplantation embryos-in which methylation patterns are reprogrammed genome wide, generating cells with a broad developmental potential. Epigenetic reprogramming in germ cells is critical for imprinting; reprogramming in early embryos also affects imprinting. Reprogramming is likely to have a crucial role in establishing nuclear totipotency in normal development and in cloned animals, and in the erasure of acquired epigenetic information. A role of reprogramming in stem cell differentiation is also envisaged. DNA methylation is one of the best-studied epigenetic modifications of DNA in all unicellular and multicellular organisms. In mammals and other vertebrates, methylation occurs predominantly at the symmetrical dinucleotide CpG (1-4). Symmetrical methylation and the discovery of a DNA methyltransferase that prefers a hemimethylated substrate, Dnmt1 (4), suggested a mechanism by which specific patterns of methylation in the genome could be maintained. Patterns imposed on the genome at defined developmental time points in precursor cells could be maintained by Dnmt1, and would lead to predetermined programs of gene expression during development in descendants of the precursor cells (5, 6). This provided a means to explain how patterns of differentiation could be maintained by populations of cells. In addition, specific demethylation events in differentiated tissues could then lead to further changes in gene expression as needed. Neat and convincing as this model is, it is still largely unsubstantiated. While effects of methylation on expression of specific genes, particularly imprinted ones (7) and some retrotransposons (8), have been demonstrated in vivo, it is still unclear whether or not methylation is involved in the control of gene expression during normal development (9-13). Although enzymes have been identified that can methylate DNA de novo (Dnmt3a and Dnmt3b) (14), it is unknown how specific patterns of methylation are established in the genome. Mechanisms for active demethylation have been suggested, but no enzymes have been identified that carry out this function in vivo (15-17). Genomewide alterations in methylation-brought about, for example, by knockouts of the methylase genes-result in embryo lethality or developmental defects, but the basis for abnormal development still remains to be discovered (7, 14). What is clear, however, is that in mammals there are developmental periods of genomewide reprogramming of methylation patterns in vivo. Typically, a substantial part of the genome is demethylated, and after some time remethylated, in a cell- or tissue-specific pattern. The developmental dynamics of these reprogramming events, as well as some of the enzymatic mechanisms involved and the biological purposes, are beginning to be understood. Here we look at what is known about reprogramming in mammals and discuss how it might relate to developmental potency and imprinting.

Animals↗
PubMed2004

Recovery of pain control by intensive reprogramming after loss of benefit from motor cortex stimulation for neuropathic pain.

INTRODUCTION: Motor cortex stimulation (MCS) may serve as an adjunct in managing neuropathic pain after other conservative and interventional methods have failed. However, the magnitude and duration of the benefit are highly variable, with a significant percentage of patients losing pain relief over time. We investigated whether intensive reprogramming could recapture the beneficial effects of MCS. METHODS: Six patients who had previously undergone MCS implantation for neuropathic pain but had lost benefit were brought back for 1-5 days of intensive reprogramming. Four patients were evaluated as inpatients while the others were seen as outpatients during multiple visits over several days. Several hours a day were spent with each patient. Patients completed visual analog scale (VAS) ratings at intervals throughout the reprogramming period to judge effectiveness of stimulation. Pre- and postadjustment VAS were compared using a paired t test. RESULTS: The patients' average age was 50 years (range 26-71). The diagnoses were trigeminal neuropathic pain (2 patients), complex regional pain syndrome I (2), phantom limb pain (1) and poststroke pain (1). The mean duration of pain was 6 years. The MCS benefit had initially lasted for a mean of 7.16 months (range 2-18 months). After reprogramming, 5 of 6 patients experienced improvement in pain. Average VAS scores decreased from 7.44 to 2.28 (p < 0.001) in those patients who responded to reprogramming. The average stimulation parameters in these patients were 5 V amplitude (range 1.7-10), 313 micros pulse width (range 240-390) and frequency of 84 Hz (range 55-130). Three patients experienced seizures during reprogramming. The mean seizure threshold was 8.9 V. No patient experienced seizures at their therapeutic settings. Pain control has been maintained after discharge. CONCLUSION: Intensive reprogramming can recapture the benefit of MCS in patients who have lost pain control. The use of broad dipoles using two contacts rather than one contact of the 1 x 4 electrode array improved the ability to recapture beneficial stimulation. There is a significant risk of seizures during aggressive reprogramming.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

[Progress on mechanism of nuclear reprogramming after nuclear transfer].

Despite cloned animals becoming almost commonplace, there is no perfect cloning technique system yet and behind every success lies hundreds of failures. Moreover, cloned animals often age and die quickly. All of those problems hinder further research in nuclear transplantation. The key to make a break-through in the research of cloned animals relies on elucidating mechanism of nuclear reprogramming. Therefore, progress on nuclear reprogramming in nuclear transplantation has been reviewed in some aspects, for example remodeling of the nuclear structure, nucleocytoplasmic interactions and effects of the cell cycle, difference of gene expression and genomic imprinting between reconstructed embryos and fertilized embryos, etc. These results indicate that cytoplasmic environment is very important for the reprogramming of transplanted nuclei. When a donor nucleus in any stage of the cell cycle is transferred into the cytoplasm of an oocyte, there are the twin processes of structural remodeling and molecular reprogramming of the nucleus after transplantation. It is evident that the cell cycle coordination between donor cell and recipient cytoplast to avoid DNA damage and to maintain correct ploidy of the reconstructed embryo is of critical importance in determining the developmental capacity of reconstructed embryos. A dramatic reprogramming of gene expression occurs during zygotic gene activation. The time of zygotic gene activation may affect nuclear reprogramming and consequently the development of reconstructed embryo to off-spring. Imprinted genes are related to the reprogramming and aberrant development seen in manipulated embryos, and may be critical in the reprogramming of transplanted somatic cell.

Animals↗
PubMed2002

Transgenic strategy for demonstrating nuclear reprogramming in the mouse.

Totipotency can be restored to the nuclei of somatic cells by reprogramming the nucleus via the technique of nuclear transfer. As genes expressed in somatic cells differ from those expressed in early embryos, a change in gene expression must accompany nuclear reprogramming. In this study, nuclear reprogramming of somatic cell nuclei following nuclear transfer (NT) was demonstrated by the reactivation of developmentally regulated lacZ reporter genes. NT embryos were generated by direct injection of adult cumulus cell nuclei into mature mouse oocytes from which maternal chromosomes were subsequently removed. Cumulus cells were collected from transgenic mice which show developmentally regulated lacZ reporter gene expression as a result of integration and functional coupling of reporter gene expression with the endogenous Oct4 or COB54 genes. As both genes are transcriptionally silent in somatic cells but are expressed during early embryonic development, reactivation of reporter gene expression in cumulus cell-derived NT embryos was assessed as a means of monitoring nuclear reprogramming. The pattern of X-gal staining observed in individual NT embryos derived from both transgenic lines revealed that coordination of reactivation appeared to be specific for each gene, and that the timing of expression was consistent with that seen in control non-manipulated transgenic embryos. However, the staining in some NT embryos appeared to be diminished or absent. This reduction in staining may indicate a failure to reprogram gene expression in these embryos. Similar transgenic strategies employing lacZ vital stains, or alter-native reporters such as GFP, may facilitate real-time monitoring of reprogramming and a potential selection strategy to increase cloning efficiency through the identification and selection of reprogrammed, preimplantation stage NT embryos prior to embryo transfer.

Animals↗
PubMed2001

Enhancing longevity of pacemakers through reprogramming. Underutilization and cost-effectiveness.

OBJECTIVE: This study was performed to observe the number of pacemakers that had never been reprogrammed after implantation, and the effect of optimised output programming on estimated longevity of pulse generators in patients with pacemaker METHODS: Sixty patients with Teletronics Reflex pacemakers were evaluated in a pacemaker clinic, from the time of the beginning of its activities, in June 1998, until March 1999. Telemetry was performed during the first clinic visit, and we observed how many pulse generators retained nominal output settings of the manufactures indicating the absence of reprogramming until that date. After evaluation of the capture threshold, reprogramming of pacemakers was performed with a safety margin of 2 to 2.5:1, and we compared the estimated longevity based on battery current at the manufacturer's settings with that based on settings achieved after reprogramming. RESULTS: In 95% of the cases, the original programmed setting was never reprogrammed before the patients attended the pacemaker clinic. Reprogramming the pacemaker prolonged estimated pulse generator life by 19.7+/-15.6 months (35.5%). CONCLUSION: The majority of the pacemakers evaluated had never been reprogrammed. Estimated pulse generator longevity can be prolonged significantly, using this simple, safe, efficacious, and cost-effective procedure.

Calibration↗
PubMed2026

Induced pluripotent stem cell reprogramming: methodological evolution and challenges in clinical translation.

Cell reprogramming can transform somatic cells into induced pluripotent stem cells providing a platform for patient-specific disease modeling, drug screening and regenerative medicine research. Since the advent of OKSM-mediated reprogramming, the system of technical approaches has evolved continuously - from integrated viral vectors to non-integrated episomal systems and, more recently, chemical reprogramming and CRISPR approaches. The simultaneous advances in single-cell multi-omics, biomaterials engineering, and artificial intelligence have further refined the controllability and precision of the reprogramming process. Despite these innovations, problems persist that hinder clinical translation: incomplete epigenetic resetting, ongoing clonal heterogeneity, genomic instability in long-term culture, and the lack of standardized Good Manufacturing Practice protocols for large-scale manufacturing. This review summarizes the trajectory of iPSC reprogramming technologies, with special emphasis on the translational applicability of each modality. We evaluated viral and nonviral delivery systems, chemical reprogramming, strategies that aid gene editing, and emerging engineering platforms, including microfluidics, smart biomaterials, and artificial-intelligence-driven process optimization. We further identify the core "translational triltrilas", namely, the inherent tradeoffs between security, homogeneity, and scalability, and propose a comprehensive strategy to overcome these bottlenecks. By linking basic mechanistic understandings with industrial and regulatory considerations, this review aims to provide a route for transitioning iPSC technology from a laboratory tool to a clinically viable manufacturing platform.

clinical translation↗
PubMed2006

In vitro reprogramming of nuclei and cells.

Directly turning a somatic cell type into another would be beneficial for producing replacement cells for therapeutic purposes. To this end, novel cell reprogramming strategies are being developed. We describe here methods for functionally reprogramming a somatic cell using an extract derived from another somatic cell type. The procedure involves reversible permeabilization of 293T fibroblasts, incubation of the permeabilized cells in a nuclear and cytoplasmic extract of T-cells, resealing of the "reprogrammed" cells, and culture for assessment of reprogramming. Reprogramming has been evidenced by nuclear uptake and assembly of transcription factors, induction of activity of a chromatin remodeling complex, changes in chromatin composition, activation of lymphoid cell-specific genes, and expression of T-cell-specific surface molecules. The system is likely to constitute a powerful tool to examine the processes of nuclear reprogramming, at least as they occur in vitro.

Bacterial Proteins↗
PubMed2002

Spatiotemporal source localisation reveals involvement of medial premotor areas in movement reprogramming.

Response priming tasks reveal huge reaction time (RT) costs when invalidly prepared movements have to be reprogrammed after the imperative response signal. Yet, possible brain correlates of motor reprogramming have rarely been examined. The present experiments were designed to ascertain the brain correlates associated with motor reprogramming by combining the recording of event-related brain potentials (ERPs) with a spatiotemporal source-localisation approach. In two experiments either valid or invalid advance information about direction (experiment 1) and about direction and response hand (experiment 2) was provided. RTs showed considerable motor reprogramming costs in invalid trials. In both experiments reprogramming effects were reflected in ERP difference waveforms in terms of a centroparietally distributed negative and a frontal positive deviation. Source localisation of these ERP difference waveforms indicated brain activity in medial higher-order motor regions. Present findings accord with the assumption that the human pre-supplementary motor area plays an important role in motor reprogramming.

Adult↗
PubMed2004

DNA demethylation is necessary for the epigenetic reprogramming of somatic cell nuclei.

Nuclear transplantation experiments in amphibia and mammals have shown that oocyte and egg cytoplasm can extensively reprogram somatic cell nuclei with new patterns of gene expression and new pathways of cell differentiation; however, very little is known about the molecular mechanism of nuclear reprogramming. Here we have used nuclear and DNA transfer from mammalian somatic cells to analyse the mechanism of activation of the stem cell marker gene oct4 by Xenopus oocytes. We find that the removal of nuclear protein accelerates the rate of reprogramming, but even more important is the demethylation of somatic cell DNA. DNA demethylation seems to precede gene reprogramming, and is absolutely necessary for oct4 transcription. Reprogramming by oocytes occurs in the absence of DNA replication and RNA/protein synthesis. It is also selective, operating only on the promoter, but not enhancers, of oct4; both a putative Sp1/Sp3 and a GGGAGGG binding site are required for demethylation and transcription. We conclude that the demethylation of promoter DNA may be a necessary step in the epigenetic reprogramming of somatic cell nuclei.

Animals↗
PubMed2005

Comparison of neurosphere cells with cumulus cells after fusion with embryonic stem cells: reprogramming potential.

Embryonic stem cells (ESCs) are the pluripotent cells that also have the capacity to induce the genomic reprogramming of differentiated somatic cells. The progressively restricted genomic potential of somatic cells observed during embryonic development can be reverted to a pluripotent state by the formation of cell hybrids with ESCs. To assess the reprogramming potential of ESCs, we investigated the reprogramming of one of two different somatic cell populations, neurosphere cells (NSCs) and cumulus cells (CCs), after fusion with ESCs. Specifically, hybrid cells were produced by cell fusion of E14 ESCs with either NSCs or CCs containing the neo/lacZ and Oct4-GFP transgenes. The first reprogramming event, observed by the presence of Oct4-GFP in the hybrid cells, could be identified on Day 2, at approximately 45 h after fusion in both ESC-NSC and ESC-CC hybrids. In addition, the two ESC-somatic cell hybrids exhibit a similar reprogramming rate and share characteristics with the E14 ESC line: (1) expression of pluripotent markers (Oct4, Rex-1 and nanog); (2) inactivation of differentiated tissue-specific gene expression; and (3) the capacity to differentiate into all three germ layers. Taken together, our results suggest that the ESC-somatic cell hybrids have fully acquired ESC characteristics and that somatic cells of different tissue origin have the same potential to be reprogrammed after fusion with ESCs.

Animals↗
PubMed2003

Reprogramming in inter-species embryonal carcinoma-somatic cell hybrids induces expression of pluripotency and differentiation markers.

Somatic cell reprogramming holds great promise for the development of novel cellular therapeutics. A number of sources of reprogramming potential have been identified, including oocytes, embryonic germ (EG) cells and embryonic stem (ES) cells. However, each of these sources of reprogramming factors is problematic, since they are either not freely available or have special growth requirements. Embryonal carcinoma (EC) cells are another source of pluripotent cells that, unlike ES and EG cells, do not usually require special growth conditions. Since they share many of the key characteristics of ES cells, such as pluripotency, EC cells may provide a readily amenable alternative source of reprogramming factors and could serve as a model for ES cells in this respect. Here we show that mouse EC cells can also function as donors of reprogramming factors. PEG-mediated fusion between murine EC cells (P19) and the cells of a human T-lymphoma cell line (CEM-GFP) resulted in inter-species hybrid colony formation. Colonies of hybrid cells displayed heterogeneity in cellular morphology as well as in their pattern of human gene expression. Expression of two human transcription factors characteristic of undifferentiated pluripotent stem cells, Oct-4 and Sox-2, was detected in the hybrid cells, demonstrating activation of endogenous human markers of pluripotency. Simultaneously, down-regulation of CD45, a marker present in lymphocytic cells, was observed in some hybrids. The detection of human specific markers of differentiation, such as nestin, lamininbeta1, and collagen IValpha1, indicates that fusion resulted in reprogramming of the human cells to reflect the differentiation potential of the murine EC partner.

Animals↗
PubMed2005

Epigenetic reprogramming in mammals.

Epigenetic marking systems confer stability of gene expression during mammalian development. Genome-wide epigenetic reprogramming occurs at stages when developmental potency of cells changes. At fertilization, the paternal genome exchanges protamines for histones, undergoes DNA demethylation, and acquires histone modifications, whereas the maternal genome appears epigenetically more static. During preimplantation development, there is passive DNA demethylation and further reorganization of histone modifications. In blastocysts, embryonic and extraembryonic lineages first show different epigenetic marks. This epigenetic reprogramming is likely to be needed for totipotency, correct initiation of embryonic gene expression, and early lineage development in the embryo. Comparative work demonstrates reprogramming in all mammalian species analysed, but the extent and timing varies, consistent with notable differences between species during preimplantation development. Parental imprinting marks originate in sperm and oocytes and are generally protected from this genome-wide reprogramming. Early primordial germ cells possess imprinting marks similar to those of somatic cells. However, rapid DNA demethylation after midgestation erases these parental imprints, in preparation for sex-specific de novo methylation during gametogenesis. Aberrant reprogramming of somatic epigenetic marks after somatic cell nuclear transfer leads to epigenetic defects in cloned embryos and stem cells. Links between epigenetic marking systems appear to be developmentally regulated contributing to plasticity. A number of activities that confer epigenetic marks are firmly established, while for those that remove marks, particularly methylation, some interesting candidates have emerged recently which need thorough testing in vivo. A mechanistic understanding of reprogramming will be crucial for medical applications of stem cell technology.

Animals↗
PubMed2004

Histone code modifications on pluripotential nuclei of reprogrammed somatic cells.

Following hybridization with embryonic stem (ES) cells, somatic genomes are epigenetically reprogrammed and acquire pluripotency. This results in the transcription of somatic genome-derived tissue-specific genes upon differentiation. During nuclear reprogramming, it is expected that DNA and chromatin modifications, believed to function in cell-type-specific epigenotype memory, should be significantly modified. Indeed, current evidence indicates that acetylation and methylation of histone H3 and H4 amino termini play a major role in the regulation of gene activity through the modulation of chromatin conformation. Here, we show that the reprogrammed somatic genome of ES hybrid cells becomes hyperacetylated at H3 and H4, while lysine 4 (K4) of H3 becomes globally hyper-di- and -tri-methylated. In the Oct4 promoter region, histones H3 and H4 are acetylated and H3-K4 is highly tri-methylated on both the ES and reprogrammed somatic genomes, which correlates with gene activation and DNA demethylation. However, H3-K4 is also di- and tri-methylated in the promoter regions of Neurofilament-M (Nfm), Nfl, and Thy-1, which are all silent in both ES and hybrid cells. Thus, H3-K4 di- and tri-methylation of reprogrammed somatic genomes is independent of gene activity and represents one of the major events that occurs during somatic genome reprogramming towards a transcriptional activation-permissive state.

Acetylation↗