Search PubMedSearch

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “pyrifazimine”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

1 recordsLinked to original sources

Comparative in vitro antimicrobial susceptibility profiles of clofazimine and pyrifazimine against clinical isolates of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in southwest China.

UNLABELLED: Clofazimine (CFZ) is a key drug used to treat drug-resistant tuberculosis (DR-TB), while pyrifazimine (TBI-166) is an improved riminophenazine derivative with better pharmacokinetics. However, there is a lack of data on its susceptibility and resistance in regions with a high disease burden, such as southwestern China. We compared the in vitro antimicrobial activities of CFZ and TBI-166 against 249 DR-TB clinical isolates (99 multidrug-resistant TB [MDR-TB] and 150 pre-extensively drug-resistant TB [pre-XDR-TB] isolates) from southwestern China. TBI-166 exhibited a concentration-dependent biphasic antimicrobial pattern compared to CFZ. TBI-166 showed significantly greater potency at low concentrations (MIC&#x2085;&#x2080; = 0.031 &#xb5;g/mL TBI-166 vs 0.25 &#xb5;g/mL for CFZ; P < 0.001), but attenuated inhibition at high concentrations (MIC&#x2089;&#x2080; > 4 &#xb5;g/mL vs 1 &#xb5;g/mL for CFZ; P < 0.001). However, at high concentrations, the antibacterial effect of TBI-166 is weaker than that of CFZ (40% of TBI-166-resistant isolates have MIC > 4 &#xb5;g/mL, compared to 6.67% of CFZ-resistant isolates, P < 0.001). Epidemiological cutoff values (ECOFFs) were 1.0 &#xb5;g/mL for CFZ and 0.25 &#xb5;g/mL for TBI-166. Based on these in vitro ECOFFs, the resistance rate to TBI-166 (20.1%, 50/249) was significantly higher than that to CFZ (6.0%, 15/249, P < 0.0001). Whole-genome sequencing revealed that mutations in Rv0678 were prevalent in dual-resistant isolates (10/14) and TBI-166 monoresistant isolates (5/40), while Rv1979c mutations were less frequent, and no pepQ mutations were detected. These mutations differed from known hotspots, suggesting potential novel resistance mechanisms. IMPORTANCE: Drug-resistant tuberculosis (DR-TB) remains a major global health challenge, and optimizing treatments for high-burden regions like southwest China is crucial. This study is the first to detail the differential in vitro activities of clofazimine (CFZ) and the novel TBI-166 against clinical DR-TB isolates from southwest China, alongside their resistance-associated genetic profiles. Findings show TBI-166 has enhanced low-concentration potency but higher resistance rates, plus novel mutations in Rv0678 and Rv1979c linked to resistance. These insights will help refine clinical regimens for DR-TB and strengthen regional resistance surveillance, both of which are essential for controlling the spread of DR-TB in southwest China and informing treatment and surveillance strategies in other similar high-burden areas globally.

Clofazimine