PubMed2026
Xenograft models are the principal in vivo platform of preclinical oncology and the most established experimental link between cell culture and clinical investigation. From the carcinogen-exposed rabbit models of the early twentieth century through the current generation of humanized patient-derived xenograft (PDX) systems, these platforms have evolved in response to the demands of translational cancer research. This review critically examines the biological principles, methodological standards, and translational applications of the principal xenograft platforms in current use. Cell line-derived xenograft (CDX) models remain the most widely used and most cost-effective modality for preclinical efficacy testing, offering the reproducibility, scalability, and accessibility that have sustained their role across oncology drug development pipelines for decades. PDX models have emerged as the preferred platform for co-clinical trial design, predictive biomarker discovery, and personalized oncology applications, preserving the genomic landscape, intratumor heterogeneity, and histological architecture of the donor tumor across serial passages. The engraftment biology of PDX systems, including immunodeficient host strain selection, implantation site, tumor source, and passage biology, is reviewed, together with humanized and autologous humanized configurations that extend the platform to immune checkpoint inhibitors, bispecific T-cell engagers, and chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR-T) cell therapy evaluation. This review addresses preclinical-to-clinical translation as a function of immunological divergence, incomplete tumor microenvironment recapitulation, and standardization. Formal frameworks, including the PDX Model Minimal Information (PDX-MI) standard and the Minimal Information for Standardization of Humanized Mice (MISHUM), are examined alongside global biobank infrastructure and emerging AI-driven translational modeling approaches.