SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “perioperative setting”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

SourceResearch connectionFrom yearThrough year

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2026

Oral melanoma in the immunotherapy era: Immune evasion, resistance, and therapeutic opportunities.

Oral melanoma (OM) is a rare and highly aggressive mucosal malignancy associated with poor survival and limited evidence to guide immunotherapy. This narrative review synthesizes current knowledge on OM immunobiology and its therapeutic implications. OM differs from cutaneous melanoma in its origin in sun-protected sites, genomic architecture, and heterogeneous immune microenvironments, features that can contribute to attenuated responses to immune checkpoint inhibitors. Anti-PD-1-based therapy has demonstrated clinical activity in mucosal melanoma, and selected OM cases have shown meaningful responses, including in multimodal and perioperative settings. However, OM-specific prospective data remain sparse, and the available evidence is largely derived from pooled mucosal melanoma cohorts or case reports. Emerging combination strategies, such as antiangiogenic agents, radiotherapy, and perioperative immunotherapy, remain insufficiently validated. This review critically reappraises the available evidence, identifies key knowledge gaps, and outlines future directions for biomarker-driven, OM-specific translational research.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Non-tobacco nicotine dependence and postoperative complications after total ankle arthroplasty: A propensity-matched cohort study.

BACKGROUND: The clinical impact of non-tobacco nicotine dependence (NTND) is poorly defined. This study evaluated the association between NTND and complications following total ankle arthroplasty (TAA). METHODS: A retrospective cohort study using the TriNetX Research Network was performed. Adults undergoing primary TAA (Current Procedural Terminology [CPT] 27702) between 2010 and 2025 were included. Patients were categorized into NTND (International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision [ICD-10]: F17, excluding tobacco-specific codes) and nonsmoker cohorts. Propensity score matching (1:1) yielded 939 NTND patients and 939 controls. Ninety-day medical and wound complications and ≥ 2-year mechanical outcomes were assessed. RESULTS: NTND patients had higher rates of 90-day readmission (11.7% vs 6.5%; OR 1.9), wound disruption (4.3% vs 2.6%; OR 1.7), surgical site infection (3.1% vs 1.6%; OR 2.0), and sepsis (2.4% vs 1.1%; OR 2.3). At a minimum 2-year follow-up, NTND was not associated with increased risk of mechanical complications. CONCLUSION: These findings challenge the assumption that smokeless nicotine products are benign in the perioperative setting and support incorporating NTND screening and cessation counseling into preoperative optimization protocols. Future prospective studies are warranted to further characterize the dose-dependent effects of non-tobacco nicotine exposure and to evaluate the impact of perioperative cessation strategies on outcomes following TAA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Evolution of Precision Oncology, Personalized Medicine, and Molecular Tumor Boards.

With multiple molecular targeted therapies available for patients with cancer that correspond to a specific genetic alteration, the selection of the best treatment is essential to ensure therapeutic efficacy. Molecular tumor boards (MTBs) play a key role in this process to deliver personalized medicine to patients with cancer in a multidisciplinary manner. Historically, personalized medicine has been offered to patients with advanced cancer, but the incorporation of molecular targeted therapies and immunotherapy into the perioperative setting requires clinicians to understand the role of the MTB. Evidence is accumulating to support feasibility and survival benefit in patients treated with matched therapy.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Evolving Role of Immunotherapy in Advanced Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: Are Programmed Death-Ligand 1 (PD-L1) Cutoffs Still Relevant?

Immune checkpoint inhibitors have transformed the management of advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) across first-line, second-line, and perioperative settings. Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression has served as the principal biomarker guiding patient selection for these agents, yet it is measured inconsistently across trials and antibody platforms, and its predictive value has come under renewed scrutiny as follow-up data have matured. This review synthesizes the pivotal randomized trials that established anti-programmed cell death protein-1 therapy in ESCC, critically appraises the pooled and patient-level meta-analyses that have re-examined outcomes across biomarker subgroups, and situates recent regulatory reassessment of PD-L1 thresholds within this broader evidence base. Assay heterogeneity between scoring systems, discordance across antibody clones, and the biological distinction between PD-L1 as a prognostic versus a predictive marker are examined as sources of continued uncertainty. The review concludes by considering emerging genomic and microenvironmental biomarkers that may eventually complement or refine PD-L1-based patient selection, and offers a framework for interpreting a single expression threshold as an approximate, assay-dependent stratifier rather than a precise biological boundary.

combined positive score↗

PubMed2026

Closed-loop vasopressor systems for hemodynamic control in perioperative and critical care settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Maintaining mean arterial pressure (MAP) within a predefined target is central to haemodynamic management in surgical and critically ill adults receiving vasopressors. Closed-loop vasopressor (CLV) systems automate titration to optimise blood pressure control, but their clinical effectiveness remains uncertain. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing CLV with manual titration. This PRISMA 2020-compliant review was prospectively registered in PROSPERO (CRD420250655697). MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, CENTRAL, and the Cochrane Library were searched (January 2000-June 2025). Randomised controlled trials enrolling adults receiving vasopressors in perioperative or intensive care settings were included. Primary outcomes were time within the MAP target range and time spent in hypotension or hypertension. Risk of bias was assessed using RoB 2.0 and certainty of evidence using GRADE. Random- or fixed-effects models were selected according to heterogeneity. Six randomized controlled trials (215 patients) were included in the systematic review, whereas five perioperative trials contributed to the meta-analysis of haemodynamic control outcomes, and one ICU-based study was summarized narratively because it did not report comparable MAP control endpoints. CLV increased time within the MAP target range (mean difference [MD] 33.94%, 95% CI 20.41-47.46; I2 = 77%) and reduced time in hypotension (MD - 18.24%, 95% CI - 28.95 to - 7.53; I2 = 73%). There was no significant difference in time in hypertension, cumulative norepinephrine dose, or major/minor adverse events. ICU length of stay was not pooled because of clinical and methodological heterogeneity. Certainty of evidence ranged from low to high (moderate for haemodynamic control outcomes). CLV systems improved haemodynamic control, primarily in perioperative settings, but heterogeneity and small samples limit confidence in effect size and generalisability. Evidence in critically ill populations remains limited, and larger trials are needed to determine whether improvements in these physiological surrogate endpoints translate into meaningful patient-centred outcomes.

Humans↗

PubMed1977

[The perioperative myocardial infarct after aortocoronary bypass].

Two sets of criteria are developed for the diagnosis of perioperative myocardial infarction: 1) new, persistent Q waves and either an elevated 48-hour MB-CPK area or a positive pyrophosphate scan, 2) severe ischemic ST-T wave changes and both elevated MB-CPK area and a positive scan.

Coronary Artery Bypass↗

PubMed2026

The opioid receptor-ligand network in human cancers: pan-cancer multi-omics profiling and translational implications.

BACKGROUND: Opioid receptor-ligand signalling has been implicated in tumour biology and perioperative outcomes; however, its pan-cancer molecular landscape and clinical relevance remain incompletely defined. METHODS: We performed a pan-cancer multi-omics analysis of eight predefined opioid receptor-ligand genes across 33 tumour types from The Cancer Genome Atlas. Analyses included gene expression analysis using the linear models for microarray data (limma) package, genomic alterations, DNA methylation, regulatory network inference, pathway activity estimation using gene set variation analysis, and survival modelling. Multivariable Cox regression models were adjusted for age, sex, and tumour stage. RESULTS: Opioid receptor-ligand genes exhibited heterogeneous and generally low-to-moderate expression across tumour types. Genomic and epigenetic alterations were tumour-specific and variably associated with gene expression. Selected genes showed associations with overall survival in a tumour-dependent manner; however, these associations were attenuated after adjustment for clinical covariates and were accompanied by wide confidence intervals in some cohorts. Pathway analyses suggested associations with broader biological programmes, including epithelial-mesenchymal transition and immune-related pathways. Regulatory analyses identified candidate transcription factors and miRNAs, although these findings are exploratory. CONCLUSIONS: This pan-cancer analysis provides a systematic overview of opioid receptor-ligand gene features across human cancers. The observed associations are context-dependent and should be interpreted as hypothesis-generating. Further mechanistic and prospective studies are required to determine the clinical relevance of opioid signalling in cancer and perioperative settings.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Impact of PerioperAtive LidocAine Infusions on Enhanced Recovery After Noncardiac Surgery (IMPALA-ERAS) in an inpatient setting: rationale, design and protocol for a sequential, repeated crossover trial.

INTRODUCTION: Multimodal analgesic strategies designed to minimise perioperative opioid exposure are fundamental components of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathways. Despite widespread implementation of ERAS protocols, the optimal analgesic regimen remains undefined, as the individual contributions of specific agents to overall analgesic efficacy and opioid-sparing effects are not fully elucidated. Intravenous lidocaine, a widely utilised local anaesthetic, possesses both analgesic and anti-inflammatory properties and has been associated with improved gastrointestinal recovery. This study seeks to pragmatically evaluate the impact of incorporating perioperative intravenous lidocaine infusion into established ERAS pathways on postoperative functional recovery. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The Impact of PerioperAtive LidocAine Infusions (IMPALA) on ERAS trial is a single-centre, pragmatic, cluster-randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study. A total of 2290 patients undergoing elective colorectal surgery, emergency general surgery, urology, ventral hernia repair, surgical oncology or spine surgery will be randomly assigned to receive either intraoperative and postoperative intravenous lidocaine infusions (administered for up to 48 hours) or placebo as part of a standardised multimodal analgesic regimen integrated into established ERAS pathways. The primary outcome is case mix index-adjusted resource length of stay, defined as the time interval from surgical initiation to hospital discharge adjusted for case mix index. The primary outcome is total inpatient opioid consumption within the first 72 hours, reported in oral morphine milligram equivalents. Secondary outcomes include various in-hospital clinical endpoints derived from the electronic health record. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This protocol and accompanying statistical analysis plan outline the study design, primary and secondary endpoints and analytic methodology. The IMPALA-ERAS trial has received ethical approval from the Vanderbilt University Institutional Review Board (IRB: 250617). The findings will be disseminated via peer-reviewed publications and presentations at national conferences. Results from this trial are expected to inform evidence-based practices regarding perioperative lidocaine infusion and its potential contributions to enhanced postoperative recovery in surgical patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT07224711.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

The role of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) to detect minimal residual disease in locally advanced gastroesophageal carcinoma: the BUTTERFLY study.

BACKGROUND: Despite advances in perioperative and neoadjuvant strategies, patients with locally advanced gastroesophageal cancers remain at high risk of recurrence after curative intent treatment. No validated biomarkers are available to detect minimal residual disease (MRD) or to guide post-operative risk-adapted management. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) has emerged as a noninvasive tool for disease monitoring; single-parameter or tumor-informed assays, however, may lack sensitivity in low-tumor burden settings. Multimodal, tumor-agnostic approaches may overcome these limitations. METHODS: The BUTTERFLY study is a prospective, multicenter observational study enrolling patients with stage II-III gastric, gastroesophageal junction, or esophageal cancer treated with perioperative chemotherapy or neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery. It evaluates the diagnostic performance and prognostic value of an academic, tumor-agnostic, multimodal ctDNA assay for MRD detection and prognostic stratification. Serial plasma samples are collected from baseline through post-operative follow-up and at relapse. Cell-free DNA is analyzed using the Agnostic Liquid Biopsy Multimodal Advancement (ALMA) platform, integrating tumor fraction estimation, somatic copy number alterations, fragmentomic features, single-nucleotide variants, and whole-genome methylation profiling. Multimodal features are combined with clinical variables using machine learning-based models to enhance MRD detection and relapse risk stratification. The primary endpoint includes sensitivity and specificity of ALMA-defined ctDNA/MRD status at the 4-8 weeks after surgery landmark, whereas secondary endpoints assess diagnostic performance at other time points and associations between ctDNA status and dynamics with disease-free survival, overall survival, treatment response, and lead time to recurrence. FUTURE PERSPECTIVES: If validated, this tumor-agnostic, multimodal ctDNA approach may enable earlier molecular relapse detection and support personalized post-operative management strategies.

circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA)↗

PubMed2026

Perioperative Depression and Anxiety Care in Older Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

IMPORTANCE: Depression and anxiety are common among older adults undergoing surgery and are associated with adverse postoperative outcomes. However, effective tailored perioperative mental health interventions are lacking. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate a perioperative intervention to optimize mental health. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A single-blind, hybrid, type 1, effectiveness-implementation randomized clinical trial was conducted (November 1, 2022, to March 31, 2025), with 3-month postoperative follow-up, at a US academic and community practice hospital network. Participants were 60 years or older; scheduled for cardiac, oncologic, or orthopedic surgery; and had clinically meaningful symptoms of depression and/or anxiety based on the Patient Health Questionnaire-Anxiety and Depressive Symptom (PHQ-ADS) scale. A total of 3159 patients were screened for eligibility, with 1518 ineligible, 1079 declining participation, and 236 excluded for other reasons. A total of 326 patients were enrolled and randomized (1:1), with 20 excluded after surgery cancelation. INTERVENTION: Participants were assigned to receive a perioperative intervention combining psychological management and pharmacologic optimization or enhanced usual care (materials for self-managing symptoms). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome was change in PHQ-ADS score from baseline to 3 months after surgery. Other outcomes included persistent postsurgical pain, delirium, falls, quality of life, patient satisfaction, length of stay, and rehospitalizations. Implementability was evaluated through semistructured interviews and reach, acceptability, feasibility, appropriateness, and fidelity measures. RESULTS: A total of 306 older adults were included in analysis (mean [SD] age, 68.5 [6.1] years; 209 [68.3%] female; 153 randomized to intervention and 153 randomized to enhanced usual care): 102 cardiac, 100 oncologic, and 104 orthopedic patients. Participants' mean (SD) baseline PHQ-ADS score was 18.5 (7.4). At 3 months, there was a significant decrease in PHQ-ADS scores in the intervention group compared with the enhanced usual care group (mean difference, 2.20; 95% CI, 0.16-4.24; P = .03). Effects varied by surgical subgroups (oncologic patients: mean difference, 4.93; 95% CI, 1.51-8.36; P = .005; cardiac patients: mean difference, 2.68; 95% CI, -0.98 to 6.35; P = .15; and orthopedic patients: mean difference, -1.11; 95% CI, -4.62 to 2.40; P = .54). Patients and interventionists perceived the intervention as appropriate, with high-fidelity delivery and broad reach across the target population. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this randomized clinical trial, psychological management and pharmacologic optimization reduced anxiety and depression in older adults undergoing surgery. Future studies should assess reproducibility and determine which patients benefit most. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifiers: NCT05575128, NCT05685511, and NCT05697835.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Genomics for precision surgical source control in anti-microbial resistant infections: A global review with focus on resource-limited settings.

BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVE: Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) critically threatens surgical safety, impairing perioperative prophylaxis and complicating infection management. Timely surgical source control is essential but relies on accurate microbiological diagnosis. Conventional culture-based methods are slow and insensitive, often leading to empirical broad-spectrum therapy. This review evaluates the role of advanced genomic diagnostics in enhancing surgical source control for AMR infections, with a focus on challenges and opportunities in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) like Pakistan. METHODOLOGY: A narrative review was conducted via a structured search of PubMed, Google Scholar, and ScienceDirect (January 2015-October 2025). Studies involving genomic tools in the management of AMR-related surgical infections were included. Evidence was synthesized thematically, covering genomic platforms, clinical applications, implementation barriers, and LMIC specific perspectives. RESULTS: Genomic tools, particularly metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) and rapid multiplex PCR, demonstrate superior sensitivity (80.6-95.45%) and faster turnaround times (e.g., roughly 27 hours for mNGS) compared to culture. They improve pathogen detection in complex infections (e.g., prosthetic joints, necrotizing soft tissue), guide targeted antibiotic therapy, and can reduce broad-spectrum use. However, major implementation barriers exist, including high costs, need for specialized infrastructure and expertise, bioinformatic challenges, and ethical data concerns, which are especially pronounced in LMICs. CONCLUSION: Genomic diagnostics offer a powerful approach to accelerate and refine surgical source control in the era of AMR. Strategic investments in local capacity, affordable platforms, and integration with antimicrobial stewardship are needed to realize their potential for improving surgical outcomes, particularly in resource-limited settings.

Antimicrobial resistance↗

PubMed2026

A multicenter survey on BRAF screening for the implementation of perioperative cancer genomic medicine for resectable colorectal oligometastases.

BACKGROUND: Genomic screening is an essential, but potentially time-consuming procedure, especially in neoadjuvant settings. We evaluated the preoperative screening of the BRAF V600E mutation for recruitment to a clinical trial among patients with resectable colorectal oligometastases (CRM). METHODS: In April 2022, an investigator-initiated trial was launched to investigate the efficacy and safety of perioperative use of the BEACON triplet regimen for BRAF V600E mutant resectable CRM. BRAF screening was retrospectively conducted in patients with resected colorectal liver metastases in 2019 for planning the trial and prospectively conducted in preoperative patients with resectable CRM from January 2022 to June 2025 for patient recruitment to the trial. RESULTS: BRAF V600E mutation was detected in 12 (3.2%) of 379 postoperative patients retrospectively and in 36 (1.7%) of 2140 preoperative patients prospectively, with 1840 patients (86.0%) carrying the wild-type and 264 patients (12.3%) classified as untested. The detection rate of the BRAF V600E mutation was significantly lower when the screening was performed prospectively in preoperative patients (P < 0.001). The untested rates varied across metastatic organs, with 10.3% in the liver, 18.1% in the lungs, 12.0% in the lymph nodes, 16.7% in the peritoneum, and 7.8% in other organs. The untested rates decreased consistently across semiannual comparisons: 28.5% in the first evaluation, followed by 15.0%, 12.0%, 8.4%, 9.1%, 7.3%, and 7.1% (P < 0.01 when compared with the first period). CONCLUSION: Raising physician awareness, as reflected by the untested rate, is a crucial factor in conducting clinical trials to implement perioperative cancer genomic medicine.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy followed by pembrolizumab in participants in Asia with early triple-negative breast cancer: An updated subgroup analysis of the KEYNOTE-522 randomized clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: In KEYNOTE-522 (NCT03036488), addition of perioperative pembrolizumab to neoadjuvant chemotherapy significantly improved pathological complete response (pCR), event-free survival (EFS), and overall survival (OS) in early-stage triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). pCR and EFS results in participants enrolled in Asia were consistent with those in the overall population. We report OS, updated EFS, and safety outcomes in participants enrolled in Asia. METHODS: Participants with newly diagnosed, high-risk, early-stage TNBC (T1c [N1‒N2] or T2‒T4 [N0‒N2] per AJCC 7th edition) were randomized 2:1 to 8 cycles of neoadjuvant pembrolizumab 200 mg Q3W or placebo plus chemotherapy. After definitive surgery, participants received adjuvant pembrolizumab 200 mg Q3W or placebo for ≤9 cycles. Primary endpoints were pCR (ypT0/Tis ypN0) and EFS. OS was a secondary endpoint. RESULTS: Of 1174 randomized participants, 216 were enrolled in Asia. At data cutoff (March 22, 2024), EFS events occurred in 18/136 participants (13.2%) in the pembrolizumab + chemotherapy group versus 22/80 (27.5%) in the placebo + chemotherapy group (HR, 0.43 [95% CI, 0.23‒0.81]); 60-month EFS rates (95% CIs) were 87.4% (80.6%‒92.0%) and 72.1% (60.7%‒80.6%), respectively. In the respective groups, 12/136 (8.8%) and 16/80 participants (20.0%) died (HR, 0.41 [95% CI, 0.19‒0.86]); 60-month OS rates (95% CIs) were 91.9% (85.8%‒95.4%) and 81.1% (70.5%‒88.1%). Treatment-related AEs led to treatment discontinuation in 19/136 participants (14.0%) with pembrolizumab + chemotherapy and 7/79 (8.9%) with placebo + chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: OS and updated EFS outcomes in KEYNOTE-522 participants enrolled in Asia were consistent with those in the overall population and support use of perioperative pembrolizumab + neoadjuvant chemotherapy as a standard-of-care treatment in this setting.

Adjuvant↗

PubMed2026

Intravenous Tranexamic Acid Reduces Perioperative Blood Loss in Reduction Mammoplasty With Immediate Implant-Based Reconstruction: A Randomized, Triple-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative hematoma and oozing can compromise outcomes after reduction mammoplasty with immediate reconstruction. Intravenous (IV) tranexamic acid (TXA) is antifibrinolytic, but prospective evidence in this setting is limited. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to determine whether a single pre-incision dose of IV TXA reduces perioperative blood loss and fibrinolytic activation vs placebo. METHODS: In this randomized, triple-blinded, placebo-controlled trial, 60 women (American Society of Anesthesiologists I/II, 18-75 years) undergoing bilateral reduction mammoplasty with immediate implant-based reconstruction received TXA 10 mg/kg in 100 mL saline or placebo 10 min before incision. The primary outcome was total blood loss within 24 h (intraoperative suction + swab plus drain output). Secondary outcomes were perioperative changes in hemoglobin, D-dimer and fibrinogen, and complications within 30 days. Intention-to-treat analyses were performed. RESULTS: All patients completed follow-up. Total blood loss was lower with TXA than with placebo (mean ± standard deviation: 221.1 ± 72.4 vs 298.1 ± 90.6 mL; mean difference -77.0 mL; 95% CI, -122.4 to -31.6; P = .001). Intraoperative loss and 24 h drain output were also reduced. Postoperative D-dimer rise was attenuated with TXA (0.31 ± 0.15 vs 0.49 ± 0.22 µg/mL; P = .002); hemoglobin decline was smaller. No thromboembolic, neurologic, or allergic events occurred; no skin-flap necrosis was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Pre-incisional IV TXA safely reduces perioperative bleeding and fibrinolytic activity after reduction mammoplasty. These findings support incorporation of IV TXA into perioperative protocols. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2 (THERAPEUTIC): For image description, please refer to the figure legend and surrounding text.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Thirty years of adjuvant therapy: From treating risk to treating residual disease.

Over the past three decades, adjuvant therapy for solid tumours has evolved from treatment based predominantly on anatomical recurrence risk towards strategies informed by tumour biology, treatment response, and molecular residual disease. Cytotoxic chemotherapy and endocrine therapy established the curative potential of postoperative systemic treatment, while targeted agents and immunotherapy expanded its efficacy across malignancies. However, matching a drug to tumour biology does not establish whether residual cancer remains, and many patients receive treatment despite having been cured by surgery alone. This Perspective examines the transition from empirical risk reduction towards selective intervention against residual disease. Response-adapted perioperative strategies provide a dynamic assessment of treatment sensitivity and support postoperative escalation or omission in defined settings. Circulating tumour DNA offers a complementary approach, but its strong prognostic value must be distinguished from evidence that biomarker-directed treatment improves outcomes. Contrasting findings from randomised trials demonstrate that neither de-escalation after a negative result nor escalation after a positive result can be generalised across clinical contexts. Future studies should integrate anatomical risk, tumour genomics, pathological response, and longitudinal molecular assessment while prioritising absolute benefit, mature survival outcomes, irreversible toxicity, patient-reported outcomes, and equitable access. They should also distinguish durable eradication from temporary suppression and evaluate treatment omission with the same rigour as intensification. Progress in adjuvant oncology should ultimately be measured by additional cures achieved with less avoidable harm, through the smallest effective intervention supported by validated evidence.

Adjuvant therapy↗

PubMed2026

Comparison of analgesic efficacy of pericapsular group of nerve block versus anterior quadratus lumborum block in adult patients undergoing unilateral hip arthroplasty: A comparative randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Total hip arthroplasty is a painful surgical procedure; therefore, it is a challenge to manage effective pain control during the perioperative period. STUDY OBJECTIVES: We compared the analgesic efficacy of the pericapsular nerve group block and the anterior quadratus lumborum block in patients undergoing unilateral hip arthroplasty. DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial. SETTINGS: Operating room of a tertiary care center. PATIENTS: 92 adult patients of >18 years who underwent elective, unilateral total hip arthroplasty under spinal anesthesia were randomized to either Group P (USG guided PENG block with 30 ml 0.25% ropivacaine +4 mg dexamethasone) or Group Q (USG guided QL block with 30 ml 0.25% ropivacaine +4 mg dexamethasone) 20 min before surgery. MEASUREMENTS: We compared the total perioperative fentanyl consumption between the two groups in the first 24 h as the primary outcome. Other outcomes included time to first rescue analgesia in the postoperative period, NRS scores at rest and on movement at 0, 2, 4, 6, 12, and 24 h, incidence of intraoperative hemodynamic changes, and incidence of postoperative PONV. MAIN RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the total fentanyl consumption between the two groups: 237.5 (150-450) μg in the P group and 250 (125-400) μg in the Q group; p = 0.617. The time to first rescue analgesia was similar in both groups: the P group (198 [123-268] minutes) and the Q group (241 [180-318] minutes); p = 0.120. There was also no difference in pain scores, intraoperative hemodynamic changes, or PONV. CONCLUSION: There was no difference in the perioperative opioid consumption, pain scores, and adverse event rates between the pericapsular nerve group block and anterior quadratus lumborum block in adult patients undergoing unilateral hip arthroplasty. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Trials Registry of India (CTRI number: CTRI/2023/08/057157).

Humans↗

PubMed1979

Scintigraphic, electrocardiographic, and enzymatic diagnosis of perioperative myocardial infarction in patients undergoing myocardial revascularization.

To assess the incidence of perioperative myocardial infarction, 214 consecutive patients were evaluated 1-5 days after coronary bypass surgery, using Tc-99m pyrophosphate (TcPPi) myocardial imaging, serial electrocardiograms (ECG), and enzyme levels (SGOT, LDH, CPK). On the basis of the clinical course and scintigraphic, enzymatic, and ECG changes, the diagnosis of perioperative infarction was definite in 17 of 241 cases (7.9%) and probable in six of 241 (2.8%). In all of these 23 patients, TcPPi scans were abnormal; one additional patient had a false-positive scintigram. Only 13 of the 23 had ECG evidence of infarction, but there were no false positives. We set the threshold for abnormality of enzyme changes quite high, owing to experience in more than 900 postoperative patients (SGOT greater than 200, LDH greater than 500, CPK greater than 500 on the same day). Using these criteria, 22 of the 23 infarct patients had abnormal enzymes, and six others were falsely positive. These results indicate a relatively low sensitivity for the ECG in diagnosing perioperative infarction, but the lack of false positives suggests high specificity. The sensitivity and specificity of the enzymes and the TcPPi image were both excellent and quite similar; the main difference was a reduction of certainty of infarction with the enzyme criteria, caused by the six patients whose enzyme values were falsely positive. Considering its sensitivity, specificity, and ability to locate and to a certain extent quantitate necrosis. TcPPi imaging is probably the most valuable means of diagnosing perioperative myocardial infarction.

Clinical Enzyme Tests↗

PubMed1979

Aortocoronary bypass grafting in the management of patients with coronary artery disease.

There is widespread agreement that aortocoronary bypass grafting generally lessens the symptoms and functional limitations of patients with angina pectoris. Evidence for prolongation of life or prevention of myocardial infarction, arrhythmias and ventricular dysfunction is inconclusive. Harmful effects associated with surgical management of coronary artery disease can be documented in terms of operative mortality, perioperative myocardial infarction, graft occlusion and progression of occlusive disease in the native circulation. In this review of published experience, the accomplishments and the limitations of myocardial revascularization are considered in various clinical settings. Critical assessment of evolving information leads to the conclusion that widespread application of this procedure beyond the alleviation of symptoms refractory to medical therapy is not justified by present data.

Angina Pectoris↗