Osteoarthritis Year in Review 2026: Genetics, genomics and epigenetics.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this narrative review is to highlight advances made over the past 12 months in the field of osteoarthritis (OA) genetics, genomics and epigenomics, with a particular focus on the interpretation of OA risk loci through functional genomic and regulatory approaches. DESIGN: PubMed and Europe PMC were searched to identify studies relevant to OA genetics, genomics and epigenomics published between 1st March 2025 and 30th April 2026. Searches used combinations of terms relating to genetics, genomics, epigenomics, functional genomics, molecular quantitative trait loci, chromatin accessibility and enhancer biology. Studies were limited to human subjects and English-language publications, with additional articles identified through citation screening and expert knowledge of the field. RESULTS: Over the past year, the field has continued to transition from large-scale locus discovery towards biological interpretation of OA genetic risk. Major advances included the largest OA genome-wide association study to date, further development of polygenic risk score approaches, and increasing integration of molecular quantitative trait loci, chromatin accessibility, and enhancer biology datasets to prioritise effector genes and elucidate regulatory mechanisms. Several studies highlighted the highly context-dependent nature of OA genetic risk mechanisms, demonstrating that distinct tissues, cell types, and regulatory layers can identify different candidate effector genes at the same locus. Additional developments included increasing application of singlecell and multi-omic technologies to study OA-relevant tissues. CONCLUSION: Recent advances in OA genetics have shifted the field from locus discovery towards mechanistic interpretation. Emerging evidence demonstrates that the biological consequences of genetic variation are highly dependent upon tissue, cell state and disease context, with different functional genomic approaches often prioritising distinct candidate genes and regulatory mechanisms at the same susceptibility locus. Together, these findings suggest that OA risk loci should increasingly be viewed as dynamic regulatory systems rather than simple variant-to-gene relationships, providing a framework for future studies aimed at resolving causal mechanisms, defining disease endotypes, and identifying therapeutic targets.