Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “mismatches”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2003

Mismatch repair in human nuclear extracts: effects of internal DNA-hairpin structures between mismatches and excision-initiation nicks on mismatch correction and mismatch-provoked excision.

DNA mismatch repair (MMR) couples recognition of base mispairs by MSH2.MSH6 heterodimers to initiation, hundreds of nucleotides away, of nascent strand 3'-5' or 5'-3' excision through the mispair. Mismatch-recognition complexes have been hypothesized to move along DNA to excision-initiation signals, in eukaryotes, perhaps ends of nascent DNA, or to remain at mismatches and search through space for initiation signals. Subsequent MMR excision, whether simple processive digestion of the targeted strand or tracking of an excision complex, remains poorly understood. In human cell-free extracts, we analyzed correction of a mismatch in a 2.2-kilobase pair (kbp) circular plasmid containing a pre-existing excision-initiation nick for initiation, and measured MMR excision (in the absence of exogenous dNTPs) at specific locations. Excision specificities were approximately 100:1 for nicked versus continuous strands, 80:1 for mismatched versus homoduplex DNA, and 30:1 for shorter (0.3-kbp) versus longer (1.9-kbp) nick-mispair paths. To test models for recognition-excision coupling and excision progress, we inserted potential blockades, 20-bp hairpins, into nick-mispair paths, using a novel technique to first generate gapped plasmid. Continuous strand longer-path hairpins did not affect mismatch correction, but shorter-path hairpins reduced correction 4-fold, and both together eliminated it. Shorter-path hairpins had little effect on initiation of (3'-5') excision, measured 30-60 nucleotides 5' to the nick, but blocked subsequent progress of excision to the mismatch; longer-path hairpins blocked the (lower level) 5'-3' excision to the mismatch. Thus, (a) MMR excision protein(s) cannot move past DNA hairpins. Hairpins at both ends of substrate-derived 0.5-kbp DNA fragments did not prevent ATP-induced dissociation of mismatch-bound human MSH2.MSH6, so recognition complexes at mismatches might provoke excision at nicks beyond hairpins, or loosely sliding MSH2.MSH6 dimers might move to the nicks.

Adenosine Triphosphate↗
PubMed2000

The cellular mismatch repair system is able to repair mismatches within MLV retroviral double-stranded DNA at a low frequency.

Eukaryotic cells possess several distinct mismatch repair pathways. A mismatch can be introduced in retroviral double-stranded DNA by a pre-existing mutation within the primer binding site (PBS) of the viral RNA genome. In order to evaluate mismatch repair of retroviral double-stranded DNA, Moloney leukemia virus (MLV)-based vectors with a mutation in their PBS were used to infect mismatch repair-competent as well as mismatch repair-deficient cell lines. If the target cells were capable of repairing the mismatch before an infected cell divided, the mismatch within the PBS could be repaired to the wild-type or mutant PBS. If the target cells were unable to repair the mismatch, half the cells in the colony should contain the mutant PBS while the other half should contain the wild-type PBS. To evaluate these predictions, individual colonies were isolated and analyzed by PCR. Almost all mismatch-deficient cell colonies analyzed (cell lines HCT 116 and PMS2-/-) contained both the wild-type and mutated PBS, therefore, mismatches within retroviral double-strand DNA could not be repaired by the mismatch-deficient cells. In contrast, mismatches in approximately 25% of the mismatch repair-competent cell clones analyzed (cell lines HeLa and PMS2+/+) were repaired, while 75% were not. Therefore, the cellular mismatch repair system is able to repair mismatches within viral double-stranded DNA, but at a low frequency.

Adenosine Triphosphatases↗
PubMed1993

Mismatched vascular defects. An easy alternative to mismatched segmental equivalent defects for the interpretation of ventilation/perfusion lung scans in pulmonary embolism.

The purpose of this investigation was to test the hypothesis that ventilation/perfusion (V/Q) lung scans in patients with suspected acute pulmonary embolism (PE) can be evaluated on the basis of the total number of mismatched vascular defects, irrespective of whether such defects are moderate or large size segmental defects. Lung scan data from the national collaborative study of the Prospective Investigation of Pulmonary Embolism Diagnosis (PIOPED) were assessed in 383 patients with acute PE and 681 patients in whom suspected PE was excluded. The predictive value of the cumulative number of mismatched moderate size segmental defects (irrespective of the number of mismatched large segmental defects) was nearly the same as that of mismatched large segmental defects (irrespective of the number of mismatched moderate size segmental defects). This suggests that the diagnostic value of mismatched moderate size segmental defects is the same as mismatched large segmental defects. Lung scans evaluated on the basis of the number of mismatched vascular defects (moderate and/or large segmental defects) were compared with V/Q scans evaluated on the basis of the number of mismatched segmental equivalents. The maximum likelihood estimates of the areas under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for the number of mismatched vascular defects and for mismatched segmental equivalents were similar (0.8512 vs 0.8530) (NS). Stratification according to the presence or absence of prior cardiopulmonary disease permitted a more accurate assessment of both clinical groups. Evaluation of V/Q scans by vascular defects and by segmental equivalents showed similar areas under the ROC curves. In conclusion, the number of mismatched vascular defects is as powerful for the assessment of V/Q scans as the number of mismatched segmental equivalents. The number of mismatched vascular defects, however, is easier to interpret, and permits a more objective evaluation.

Humans↗
PubMed1999

Inefficient in vivo repair of mismatches at an oncogenic hotspot correlated with lack of binding by mismatch repair proteins and with phase of the cell cycle.

Repair rates of mismatched nucleotides located at an activating hotspot of mutation, H-ras codon 12, have been analyzed in vivo in mammalian cells. Repair rates at codon 12 are significantly improved in cells synchronized to the G(1) stage of the mammalian cell cycle as compared with non-synchronous cells, demonstrating that mismatch repair mechanisms are active in G(1). Repair rates in non-synchronous cells for the same mismatches at a nearby non-hotspot of mutation, H-ras codon 10, are also significantly improved over repair rates at codon 12 in non-synchronous cells, demonstrating that DNA mismatch repair rates can differ depending on the sequence context. These results suggest that inefficiencies in mismatch repair are responsible, at least in part, for the well documented hotspot of mutation at codon 12. Further experiments involving gel-shift analysis demonstrate a mismatch-specific binding factor for which the degree of binding correlates with in vivo repair rates for each mismatch tested at the codon 12 location. This binding factor appears to be the hMutSalpha heterodimer as identified by monoclonal antibody assay and inhibition of binding by ATP. Furthermore, a lack of binding is observed only for G:A mismatches at the codon 12 location. This lack of binding correlates with the low rate of repair observed in vivo for G:A mismatches at codon 12 versus the improved repair rates for G:A mismatches at codon 10. This may have biological relevance in that G:C-->T:A tranversions are a common mutation at this location in naturally occurring human tumors. These results suggest that there is lowered efficiency in the kinetics of mismatch repair at codon 12. Mismatches at this location are therefore more likely to be replicated before repair, thus resulting in a mutation.

3T3 Cells↗
PubMed1999

Specific binding of human MSH2.MSH6 mismatch-repair protein heterodimers to DNA incorporating thymine- or uracil-containing UV light photoproducts opposite mismatched bases.

Previous studies have demonstrated recognition of DNA-containing UV light photoproducts by bacterial (Feng, W.-Y., Lee, E., and Hays, J. B. (1991) Genetics 129, 1007-1020) and human (Mu, D., Tursun, M., Duckett, D. R., Drummond, J. T., Modrich, P., and Sancar, A. (1997) Mol. Cell. Biol. 17, 760-769) long-patch mismatch-repair systems. Mismatch repair directed specifically against incorrect bases inserted during semi-conservative DNA replication might efficiently antagonize UV mutagenesis. To test this hypothesis, DNA 51-mers containing site-specific T-T cis-syn-cyclobutane pyrimidine-dimers or T-T pyrimidine-(6-4')pyrimidinone photoproducts, with all four possible bases opposite the respective 3'-thymines in the photoproducts, were analyzed for the ability to compete with radiolabeled (T/G)-mismatched DNA for binding by highly purified human MSH2.MSH6 heterodimer protein (hMutSalpha). Both (cyclobutane-dimer)/AG and ((6-4)photoproduct)/AG mismatches competed about as well as non-photoproduct T/T mismatches. The two respective pairs of photoproduct/(A(T or C)) mismatches also showed higher hMutSalpha affinity than photoproduct/AA "matches"; the apparent affinity of hMutSalpha for the ((6-4)photoproduct)/AA-"matched" substrate was actually less than that for TT/AA homoduplexes. Surprisingly, although hMutSalpha affinities for both non-photoproduct UU/GG double mismatches and for (uracil-cyclobutane-dimer)/AG single mismatches were high, affinity for the (uracil-cyclobutane-dimer)/GG mismatch was quite low. Equilibrium binding of hMutSalpha to DNA containing (photoproduct/base) mismatches and to (T/G)-mismatched DNA was reduced similarly by ATP (in the absence of magnesium).

Base Pair Mismatch↗
PubMed1993

Analysis of sequence contexts flanking T.G mismatches leads to predictions about reactivity of the mismatched T to osmium tetroxide.

Osmium tetroxide and hydroxylamine are used to detect mutations in DNA and RNA after hybridization of mutant and wild-type DNA. Mismatched T and C bases, respectively, are modified by these reagents and the DNA strand cleaved at the mismatched bases by subsequent treatment with piperidine. This allows detection and location of the mutation. Although most T.G mismatches have been reported to be reactive to osmium tetroxide, some have been reported to be unreactive. The aim of this study was to collect and analyze the reactive and unreactive T.G mismatches. We have collected sequence contexts of all reactive and unreactive T.G mismatches for analysis. This involves 10 unreactive T.G mismatches (plus one T.C) and 19 reactive T.G mismatches. Sequence effects of bases surrounding these mismatches must influence this reactivity. There must be many types of such sequence effects. We postulate that because of the dominance of 5' G bases near the T of unreactive T.G mismatches and the absence of 5' G bases in reactive T.G mismatches that the stacking of the 5' G on the mismatched T is the reason for this lack of reactivity in the majority of the cases studied here.

Base Sequence↗
PubMed1986

Structures of mismatched base pairs in DNA and their recognition by the Escherichia coli mismatch repair system.

The Escherichia coli mismatch repair system does not recognize and/or repair all mismatched base pairs with equal efficiency: whereas transition mismatches (G X T and A X C) are well repaired, the repair of some transversion mismatches (e.g. A X G or C X T) appears to depend on their position in heteroduplex DNA of phage lambda. Undecamers were synthesized and annealed to form heteroduplexes with a single base-pair mismatch in the centre and with the five base pairs flanking each side corresponding to either repaired or unrepaired heteroduplexes of lambda DNA. Nuclear magnetic resonance (n.m.r.) studies show that a G X A mismatch gives rise to an equilibrium between fully helical and a looped-out structure. In the unrepaired G X A mismatch duplex the latter predominates, while the helical structure is predominant in the case of repaired G X A and G X T mismatches. It appears that the E. coli mismatch repair enzymes recognize and repair intrahelical mismatched bases, but not the extrahelical bases in the looped-out structures.

Bacteriophage lambda↗
PubMed1989

The contrasting structures of mismatched DNA sequences containing looped-out bases (bulges) and multiple mismatches (bubbles).

We have studied the structure and reactivities of two kinds of mismatched DNA sequences--unopposed bases, or bulges, and multiple mismatched pairs of bases. These were generated in a constant sequence environment, in relatively long DNA fragments, using a technique based on heteroduplex formation between sequences cloned into single-stranded M13 phage. The mismatched sequences were studied from two points of view, viz 1. The mobility of the fragments on gel electrophoresis in polyacrylamide was studied in order to examine possible bending of the DNA due to the presence of the mismatch defect. Such bending would constitute a global effect on the conformation of the molecule. 2. Sequences in and around the mismatches were studied using enzyme and chemical probes of DNA structure. This would reveal more local structural effects of the mismatched sequences. We observed that the structures of the bulges and the multiple mismatches appear to be fundamentally different. The bulged sequences exhibited a large gel retardation, consistent with a significant bending of the DNA at the bulge, and whose magnitude depends on the number of mismatched bases. The larger bulges were sensitive to cleavage by single-strand specific nucleases, and modified by diethyl pyrocarbonate (adenines) or osmium tetroxide (thymines) in a non-uniform way, suggesting that the bulges have a precise structure that leads to exposure of some, but not all, of the bases. In contrast the multiple mismatches ('bubbles') cause very much less bending of the DNA fragment in which they occur, and uniform patterns of chemical reactivity along the length of the mismatched sequences, suggesting a less well defined, and possibly flexible, structure. The precise structure of the bulges suggests that such features may be especially significant for recognition by proteins.

Base Composition↗
PubMed2001

HLA-C mismatches induce strong cytotoxic T-cell reactivity in the presence of an additional DRB/DQB mismatch and affect NK cell-mediated alloreactivity.

BACKGROUND: The functional relevance of HLA-C mismatches in an alloresponse is still much debated, putting into doubt the relevance of matching for this antigen in selection of an allogeneic bone marrow donor. In addition to presenting peptides to T cells, HLA-C also functions as a ligand for killing inhibitory receptors (KIRs) on natural killer (NK) cells. In the current study we provide an in vitro basis to address the question of whether mismatches for this antigen are a risk factor for acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). METHODS AND RESULTS: By analysis of cytotoxic and helper T-lymphocyte precursor frequency (CTLp-f and HTLp-f) in 153 pairs, we are able to show that isolated HLA-C mismatches appear less immunogenic than do isolated HLA-A mismatches. Strikingly, the presence of an HLA-C mismatch next to a HLA-DRB or HLA-DQB mismatch leads to a synergistic increase in CTLp-f outcome. Moreover, we are the first to show that absence of a single inhibitory epitope as a result of an HLA-C mismatch can be sufficient to induce NK mediated alloreactivity, that is, kill and proliferate. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that, in most cases, isolated HLA-C mismatches may be acceptable with respect to T-cell-mediated alloreactivity; however, the presence of a strong helper epitope (DR/DQ mismatch) appears sufficient to overcome the low immunogenicity of HLA-C. HLA-C mismatches that affect KIR epitopes, can induce NK mediated alloreactivity. This suggests that, in HLA-A-, -B-, -DR-, and -DQ-matched patients, NK cells may play a role in the induction and development of acute GVHD.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed1996

Binding of insertion/deletion DNA mismatches by the heterodimer of yeast mismatch repair proteins MSH2 and MSH3.

DNA-mismatch repair removes mismatches from the newly replicated DNA strand. In humans, mutations in the mismatch repair genes hMSH2, hMLH1, hPMS1 and hPMS2 result in hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) [1-8]. The hMSH2 (MSH for MutS homologue) protein forms a complex with a 160 kDa protein, and this heterodimer, hMutSalpha, has high affinity for a G/T mismatch [9,10]. Cell lines in which the 160 kDa subunit of hMutSalpha is mutated are specifically defective in the repair of base-base and single-nucleotide insertion/deletion mismatches [9,11]. Genetic studies in S. cerevisiae have suggested that MSH2 functions with either MSH3 or MSH6 in mismatch repair, and, in the absence of the latter two genes, MSH2 is inactive [12,13]. MSH6 encodes the yeast counterpart of the 160 kDa subunit of hMutSalpha [12,13]. As in humans, yeast MSH6 forms a complex with MSH2, and the MSH2-MSH6 heterodimer binds a G/T mismatch [14]. Here, we find that MSH2 and MSH3 form another stable heterodimer, and we purify this heterodimer to near homogeneity. We show that MSH2-MSH3 has low affinity for a G/T mismatch but binds to insertion/deletion mismatches with high specificity, unlike MSH2-MSH6.

Base Sequence↗
PubMed1988

Repair of single base-pair transversion mismatches of Escherichia coli in vitro: correction of certain A/G mismatches is independent of dam methylation and host mutHLS gene functions.

Six different base-pair transversion mismatches are repaired with different efficiencies in an in vitro mismatch repair system. In particular, the T/T and C/C mismatches appear to be less efficiently repaired than the A/A and G/G mismatches. Four A/G and four C/T mismatches at different positions are repaired to different extents. One of the A/G mismatches is repaired equally efficiently when DNA heteroduplexes are fully methylated or hemi-methylated at the d(GATC) sequences. This type of mismatch repair appears to be unidirectional with A to C conversion by acting at A/G mispairs to restore the C/G pairs. This methylation-independent correction is not controlled by the mutH, mutL, mutS, uvrE, uvrB, phr, recA, recF, and recJ gene products. The independence of the transversion mismatch repair of these genes and methylation distinguishes this from the known mismatch repair pathways.

Base Composition↗
PubMed1997

Highly mismatched molecules resembling recombination intermediates efficiently transform mismatch repair proficient Escherichia coli.

The ability of related DNAs to undergo recombination decreases with increased sequence divergence. Mismatch repair has been proposed to be a key factor in preventing homeologous recombination; however, the contribution of mismatch repair is not universal. Although mismatch repair has been proposed to act by preventing strand exchange and/or inactivating multiply mismatched heteroduplexes, there has been no systematic study to determine at what step(s) in recombination mismatch repair acts in vivo. Since heteroduplex is a commonly proposed intermediate in many models of recombination, we have investigated the consequences of mismatch repair on plasmids that are multiply mismatched in heteroduplex structures that are similar to those that might arise during recombination. Plasmids containing multiply mismatched regions were transformed into wild-type and Mut+ Escherichia coli mutants. There was only a 30-40% reduction in transformation of Mut+ as compared to mutS and mutL strains for DNAs containing an 18% mismatched heteroduplex. The products obtained from mutS hosts differed from those obtained from Mut+ hosts in that there were many more colonies containing mixtures of two plasmids, due to survival of both strands of the heteroduplex. There were nearly 10 times more recombinants obtained from the mutS as compared to the wild-type host. Based on these results and those from other studies with E. coli and yeast, we propose that the prevention of recombination between highly diverged DNAs may be at a step earlier than heteroduplex formation.

DNA Repair↗
PubMed1998

Efficient repair of all types of single-base mismatches in recombination intermediates in Chinese hamster ovary cells. Competition between long-patch and G-T glycosylase-mediated repair of G-T mismatches.

Repair of all 12 single-base mismatches in recombination intermediates was investigated in Chinese hamster ovary cells. Extrachromosomal recombination was stimulated by double-strand breaks in regions of shared homology. Recombination was predicted to occur via single-strand annealing, yielding heteroduplex DNA (hDNA) with a single mismatch. Nicks were expected on opposite strands flanking hDNA, equidistant from the mismatch. Unlike studies of covalently closed artificial hDNA substrates, all mismatches were efficiently repaired, consistent with a nick-driven repair process. The average repair efficiency for all mispairs was 92%, with no significant differences among mispairs. There was significant strand-independent repair of G-T --> G-C, with a slightly greater bias in a CpG context. Repair of C-A was also biased (toward C-G), but no A-C --> G-C bias was found, a possible sequence context effect. No other mismatches showed evidence of biased repair, but among hetero-mismatches, the trend was toward retention of C or G vs. A or T. Repair of both T-T and G-T mismatches was much less efficient in mismatch repair-deficient cells (approximately 25%), and the residual G-T repair was completely biased toward G-C. Our data indicate that single-base mismatches in recombination intermediates are substrates for at least two competing repair systems.

Animals↗
PubMed1997

Recognition and repair of compound DNA lesions (base damage and mismatch) by human mismatch repair and excision repair systems.

Nucleotide excision repair and the long-patch mismatch repair systems correct abnormal DNA structures arising from DNA damage and replication errors, respectively. DNA synthesis past a damaged base (translesion replication) often causes misincorporation at the lesion site. In addition, mismatches are hot spots for DNA damage because of increased susceptibility of unpaired bases to chemical modification. We call such a DNA lesion, that is, a base damage superimposed on a mismatch, a compound lesion. To learn about the processing of compound lesions by human cells, synthetic compound lesions containing UV photoproducts or cisplatin 1,2-d(GpG) intrastrand cross-link and mismatch were tested for binding to the human mismatch recognition complex hMutS alpha and for excision by the human excision nuclease. No functional overlap between excision repair and mismatch repair was observed. The presence of a thymine dimer or a cisplatin diadduct in the context of a G-T mismatch reduced the affinity of hMutS alpha for the mismatch. In contrast, the damaged bases in these compound lesions were excised three- to fourfold faster than simple lesions by the human excision nuclease, regardless of the presence of hMutS alpha in the reaction. These results provide a new perspective on how excision repair, a cellular defense system for maintaining genomic integrity, can fix mutations under certain circumstances.

Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing↗
PubMed1998

Analysis of in vivo correction of defined mismatches in the DNA mismatch repair mutants msh2, msh3 and msh6 of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

We have analysed the correction of defined mismatches in wild-type and msh2, msh3, msh6 and msh3 msh6 mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in two different yeast strain backgrounds by transformation with plasmid heteroduplex DNA constructs. Ten different base/base mismatches, two single-nucleotide loops and a 38-nucleotide loop were tested. Repair of all types of mismatches was severely impaired in msh2 and msh3 msh6 mutants. In msh6 mutants, repair efficiency of most base/base mismatches was reduced to a similar extent as in msh3 msh6 double mutants. G/T and A/C mismatches, however, displayed residual repair in msh6 mutants in one strain background, implying a role for Msh3p in recognition of base/base mismatches. Furthermore, the efficiency of repair of base/base mismatches was considerably reduced in msh3 mutants in one strain background, indicating a requirement for MSH3 for fully efficient mismatch correction. Also the efficiency of repair of the 38-nucleotide loop was reduced in msh3 mutants, and to a lesser extent in msh6 mutants. The single-nucleotide loop with an unpaired A was less efficiently repaired in msh3 mutants and that with an unpaired T was less efficiently corrected in msh6 mutants, indicating non-redundant functions for the two proteins in the recognition of single-nucleotide loops.

DNA Repair↗
PubMed2005

Binding of MutS mismatch repair protein to DNA containing UV photoproducts, "mismatched" opposite Watson--Crick and novel nucleotides, in different DNA sequence contexts.

Mismatch-repair (MMR) systems suppress mutation via correction of DNA replication errors (base-mispairs) and responses to mutagenic DNA lesions. Selective binding of mismatched or damaged DNA by MutS-homolog proteins-bacterial MutS, eukaryotic MSH2.MSH6 (MutSalpha) and MSH2.MSH3-initiates mismatch-correction pathways and responses to lesions, and may cumulatively increase discrimination at downstream steps. MutS-homolog binding selectivity and the well-known but poorly understood effects of DNA-sequence contexts on recognition may thus be primary determinants of MMR specificity and efficiency. MMR processes that modulate UV mutagenesis might begin with selective binding by MutS homologs of "mismatched" T[CPD]T/AG and T[6--4]T/AG photoproducts, reported previously for hMutSalpha and described here for E. coli MutS protein. If MMR suppresses UV mutagenesis by acting directly on pre-mutagenic products of replicative bypass, mismatched photoproducts should be recognized in most DNA-sequence contexts. In three of four contexts tested here (three substantially different), T[CPD]T/AG was bound only slightly better by MutS than was T[CPD]T/AA or homoduplex DNA; only one of two contexts tested promoted selective binding of T[6--4]T/AG. Although the T:G pairs in T[CPD]T/AG and T/G both adopt wobble conformations, MutS bound T/G well in all contexts (K(1/2) 2.1--2.9 nM). Thus, MutS appears to select the two mismatches by different mechanisms. NMR analyses elsewhere suggest that in the (highly distorted) T[6--4]T/AG a forked H-bond between O2 of the 3' thymine and the ring 1-imino and exocyclic 2-amino guanine protons stabilizes a novel planar structure not possible in T[6--4]T/AA. Replacement of G by purines lacking one (inosine, 2-aminopurine) or both (nebularine) protons markedly reduced or eliminated selective MutS binding, as predicted. Previous studies and the work here, taken together, suggest that in only about half of DNA sequence contexts could MutS (and presumably MutSalpha) selectively bind mismatched UV photoproducts and directly suppress UV mutagenesis.

Adenosine Triphosphatases↗
PubMed2002

Relative rates of insertion and deletion mutations in dinucleotide repeats of various lengths in mismatch repair proficient mouse and mismatch repair deficient human cells.

Microsatellites are DNA elements composed of short tandem repeats of 1-5bp. These sequences are particularly prone to frameshift mutation by insertion-deletion loop formation during replication. The mismatch repair system is responsible for correcting these replication errors, and microsatellite mutation rates are significantly elevated in the absence of mismatch repair. We have investigated the effect of varying the number of repeats in a (CA)n microsatellite on mutation rates in cultured mammalian cells proficient or deficient in mismatch repair. We have also compared the relative rates of single-repeat insertions and deletions in these cells. Two plasmid vectors were constructed for each repeat unit number (n=8, 17, and 30), such that the microsatellites, placed upstream of a bacterial neomycin resistance gene (neo), disrupted the reading frame of the gene in the (-1) or (+1) direction. Plasmids were introduced separately into the cells, where they integrated into the cellular genome. Mutation rates were determined by selection of clones with frameshift mutations in the microsatellite that restored the reading frame of the neo gene. We found that mutation rates were significantly higher for (CA)17 and (CA)30 tracts than for (CA)8 tracts in both mismatch repair proficient (mouse) and deficient (human) cells. A mutational bias favoring insertions was generally observed. In both (CA)17 and (CA)30 tracts, single-repeat insertion rates were higher than single-repeat deletion rates with or without mismatch repair; deletions of multiple repeat units (> or =8bp) were observed in these tracts, where as deletions this large were not found in the (CA)8 tract. Single-repeat mutations of both types were made at similar rates in (CA)8 tracts in human mismatch repair deficient (MMR-) cells, but single-repeat insertion rates were higher than single-repeat deletion rates in mouse mismatch repair proficient (MMR+) cells. Results of these direct studies on microsatellite mutations in cultured cells should be useful for refinement of mathematical models for microsatellite evolution.

Animals↗
PubMed2000

Human mismatch repair and G*T mismatch binding by hMutSalpha in vitro is inhibited by adriamycin, actinomycin D, and nogalamycin.

Loss of the human DNA mismatch repair pathway confers cross-resistance to structurally unrelated anticancer drugs. Examples include cisplatin, doxorubicin (adriamycin), and specific alkylating agents. We focused on defining the molecular events that link adriamycin to mismatch repair-dependent drug resistance because adriamycin, unlike drugs that covalently modify DNA, can interact reversibly with DNA. We found that adriamycin, nogalamycin, and actinomycin D comprise a class of drugs that reversibly inhibits human mismatch repair in vitro at low micromolar concentrations. The substrate DNA was not covalently modified by adriamycin treatment in a way that prevents repair, and the inhibition was independent of the number of intercalation sites separating the mismatch and the DNA nick used to direct repair, from 10 to 808 base pairs. Over the broad concentration range tested, there was no evidence for recognition of intercalated adriamycin by MutSalpha as if it were an insertion mismatch. Inhibition apparently results from the ability of the intercalated drug to prevent mismatch binding, shown using a defined mobility shift assay, which occurs at drug concentrations that inhibit repair. These data suggest that adriamycin interacts with the mismatch repair pathway through a mechanism distinct from the manner by which covalent DNA lesions are processed.

Alkylating Agents↗