Search PubMedSearch

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “machine learning prediction model”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

A machine learning-based predictive model for radiosensitivity in nasopharyngeal carcinoma utilizing serum proteomics.

BACKGROUND: Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) remains highly sensitive to radiotherapy; however, radioresistance in a subset of patients leads to local recurrence and distant metastasis. Serum proteomics provides a minimally invasive approach to capturing dynamic physiological changes, and machine learning enables efficient construction of predictive models. This study aimed to develop and validate a serum proteomics–based machine-learning model for predicting radiotherapy sensitivity in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC). METHODS: Pretreatment serum samples from newly diagnosed NPC patients were analyzed using SELDI-TOF-MS. Differentially expressed proteins between radiosensitive and radioresistant groups were identified using limma. GO and KEGG analyses were performed to explore functional enrichment. Twelve machine-learning algorithms were used to construct predictive models, and the top-performing models were optimized through feature selection. A Random Forest model with seven features was identified as the optimal model. External validation was performed using an independent cohort with ELISA-quantified protein levels. Model performance was assessed using Receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC), calibration analysis, decision curve analysis (DCA), and 10-fold cross-validation. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis was applied for model interpretability, and the final model was deployed via a ShinyAPP. RESULTS: A total of 96 differentially expressed proteins were identified, which involved multiple function and signaling pathways. The Random Forest model demonstrated the best predictive performance, achieving an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.963 in the training set and 0.975 in the validation set. Cross-validation yielded an average AUC of 0.965. DCA indicated high clinical utility across a broad threshold range, and calibration curves showed good model agreement. Seven proteins (PLXND1, GSR, PGD, PTPRC, OR2T29, ACTG2, CHAD) were selected as final features. SHAP analysis provided global and individual-level interpretability. A web-based tool was developed to facilitate clinical application. CONCLUSION: This study establishes a robust serum proteomics–based machine-learning model capable of accurately predicting radiotherapy sensitivity in NPC. The model offers clinical interpretability and practical implementation, supporting personalized radiotherapy decision-making.

Humans

Development and Validation of Machine Learning Models for Predicting Early Cognitive Decline Using Home Sensor-Derived Behavioral Data: Sensors in-Home for Elder Wellbeing (SINEW) Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: As the global population continues to age, the prevalence of geriatric conditions, including dementia and frailty, is also increasing. Early identification of individuals at an elevated risk of these conditions, such as those presenting with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or prefrailty, can provide a critical window for prompt intervention aimed at preventing or reversing disease progression. To promote such early identification, there is a burgeoning interest in the use of digital sensor technology and predictive modeling. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to use a continuous, home-based monitoring sensor system for older adults to distinguish those exhibiting normal aging from those with MCI, early dementia, prefrailty, or frailty, and to predict their transition from normal aging to one of these conditions. METHODS: This longitudinal cohort study will recruit 200 community-dwelling adults aged ≥65 years with normal cognition or MCI at baseline. A multi-sensor system will be installed in participants' homes, including passive infrared motion sensors, door contact sensors, bed sensors, medication box sensors, wearable activity bands, and Bluetooth proximity beacons. These devices will continuously capture spatiotemporal activity patterns, mobility indicators, sleep behaviors, and medication-taking routines. Annual assessments will include standardized cognitive tests (eg, Montreal Cognitive Assessment, Mini-Mental State Examination, Rey Auditory-Verbal Learning Test, digit span, Color Trails Test, semantic fluency, Stroop), frailty measures (modified Fried phenotype, gait speed, grip strength), mental health scales, sleep quality, and psychosocial indicators. Sensor-derived features-such as gait variability, activity regularity, sleep fragmentation, and medication adherence patterns-will be integrated with clinical data to develop supervised machine learning models. Planned approaches include logistic regression, random forests, gradient boosting, and deep learning. Model performance will be evaluated using cross-validation and independent test sets. Primary metrics will include area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, sensitivity, specificity, precision, recall, and F1-score. Models will be benchmarked against gold-standard clinical diagnoses and validated using temporal subsets of the dataset. RESULTS: Enrollment for this study started in November 2019 and will continue until March 2030. As of June 2025, we have enrolled 138 participants. Full data analysis has yet to begin. CONCLUSIONS: We aim to develop a reliable and effective sensor system for in-home use that will facilitate the early detection of cognitive and physical decline. In so doing, it will add to our current understanding of digital biomarkers. It is common for older adults to seek clinical intervention only when their cognitive impairment has already reached an advanced stage. The implementation of readily deployable sensor systems within community settings presents us with opportunities for prompt intervention, which holds the potential for delaying or reversing disease progression and allowing for a greater number of functional and meaningful years.

Humans

Predicting ACL injury risk in athletes: A systematic review of machine learning-based models.

BACKGROUND: Early ACL injury risk identification in athletes is essential. This systematic review examines machine learning (ML) models for predicting ACL injuries, evaluating their methodological quality, performance, and reliability. METHOD: A comprehensive electronic search was conducted across PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and IEEE Xplore databases, supplemented by Google Scholar for grey literature, covering articles published between January 1, 2015, and August 30, 2025. Eligible studies were appraised using the Prediction Model Study Risk of Bias Assessment Tool (PROBAST) for methodological quality and risk of bias, and the Transparent Reporting of a Multivariable Prediction Model for Individual Prognosis or Diagnosis (TRIPOD) guidelines for quality of evidence. RESULTS: Ten studies were included. PROBAST showed eight studies had moderate risk of bias and two low risk. TRIPOD found only two studies met quality criteria. ML models included logistic regression (n = 5), support vector machines (n = 4), k-nearest neighbor (n = 3), decision trees (n = 3), random forests (n = 5), neural networks (n = 2), linear discriminant analysis (n = 1), and pre-trained CNNs (n = 1). AUC ranged from 0.63 to 0.98. Accuracy (reported in six studies) ranged from 26% to 95%; however, these values should be interpreted with caution due to the absence of confidence intervals, lack of class imbalance handling, and limited external validation across studies. Tree-based ensemble methods such as random forest achieved competitive accuracy (74-86%), while SVM, a non-ensemble classifier, reported accuracy ranging from 71% to 95%; however, the highest values were obtained in studies with notably small sample sizes (n = 12 to n = 39), raising concerns about overfitting and generalizability. CONCLUSION: Current ML algorithms show promise for identifying athletes at high ACL injury risk and detecting relevant risk factors. Although study quality was generally satisfactory, future research should prioritize external validation and model interpretability to support clinical translation.

Humans

Pathomics-based machine learning models for predicting METTL5 expression and prognosis in lung adenocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: METTL5, an N6-methyladenosine (m6A) RNA methyltransferase, has been implicated in tumor progression, but its prognostic value and non-invasive prediction in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) remain unclear. This study aimed to develop a pathomics-based machine learning model to predict METTL5 expression from histopathological images and evaluate its prognostic significance in LUAD. METHODS: A total of 327 LUAD patients from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) with matched hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) slides, transcriptomic, and clinical data were included and randomly divided into training and validation sets (7:3). Quantitative histopathological features were extracted using PyRadiomics. Feature selection was performed via maximum relevance minimum redundancy (mRMR) and recursive feature elimination (RFE), followed by construction of a Gradient Boosting Machine (GBM) model. A pathomics score (PS) was generated to assess prognostic relevance. Survival analyses, gene set variation analysis (GSVA), tumor mutational burden (TMB), immune infiltration analysis, and in vitro functional assays were conducted. RESULTS: METTL5 overexpression was independently associated with poor overall survival [hazard ratio (HR) =1.637, P=0.007]. The model achieved good predictive performance [area under the curve (AUC) =0.847 in the training set and 0.752 in the validation set]. High PS was significantly associated with worse survival and remained an independent prognostic factor (HR =1.563, P=0.03). Elevated PS correlated with altered metabolic pathways, increased TMB, and immune microenvironment changes. METTL5 knockdown reduced proliferation, migration, invasion, and epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) in A549 cells. CONCLUSIONS: The pathomics-based model accurately predicts METTL5 expression and provides prognostic stratification in LUAD, supporting its potential as a practical imaging-derived biomarker.

Methyltransferase-like 5

Development and external validation of an explainable machine learning model for predicting chronic kidney disease progression in the Korean population.

BACKGROUND: Current risk stratification models, such as the Kidney Failure Risk Equation (KFRE), exhibit variable performance across ethnic groups and fail to capture dynamic clinical trajectories. This study aimed to develop and validate a Korean-specific machine learning (ML) model for predicting chronic kidney disease (CKD) progression using an ensemble approach. METHODS: We used electronic health records from Seoul National University Hospital for model development (n = 28,209) and the Korean Genome and Epidemiology Study (KoGES) CKD cohort for external validation (n = 3,960). The primary outcome was a composite of ≥40% decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) or progression to end-stage renal disease within 2 years. A soft-voting ensemble of four ML algorithms (XGBoost, LightGBM, CatBoost, and Random Forest) was developed. RESULTS: The ensemble model demonstrated robust discrimination in internal validation (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUROC], 0.939; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.934-0.944), significantly exceeding the KFRE (AUROC, 0.879-0.884). External validation in the KoGES cohort showed comparable discrimination (AUROC, 0.859; 95% CI, 0.798-0.914) versus KFRE (four-variable AUROC, 0.882; 95% CI, 0.818-0.935). Shapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis identified baseline eGFR, serum creatinine, eGFR slope, albumin, and hemoglobin as key prognostic features, supporting a complementary framework using KFRE for community screening and the ML model for hospital-based risk stratification. CONCLUSION: The ensemble ML model accurately predicts short-term CKD progression in Korean patients. By incorporating longitudinal features and ensemble learning, it provides a precise alternative to Western-derived equations, particularly in tertiary care settings.

Chronic kidney failure

DBP-CanPred: a machine learning model for predicting cancer-causing mutations in DNA-binding proteins.

INTRODUCTION: The fundamental cellular processes, including transcriptional regulation, chromatin organization, and genome maintenance, are regulated by DNA-binding proteins (DBPs). Mutations in DBPs can alter protein-DNA interactions, leading to tumor development. However, identifying such driver mutations remains a major challenge due to limitations of experimental approaches. METHODS: We have trained a machine learning model, DBP-CanPred, to identify driver mutations in DBPs. We used the sequence-derived evolutionary features, as well as structure-based features such as mutation-perturbed structural descriptors. RESULTS: We evaluated DBP-CanPred using a curated test set, achieving an AU-ROC of 0.86 and a balanced accuracy of 0.79. Further analysis based on substitution-type showed consistent performance across different categories, especially higher performance on charged residues. In addition, we applied the model on an independent dataset and identified potential driver mutations with high confidence scores. DISCUSSION: The study contributes to understanding mutation patterns in DNA-binding proteins and supports variant interpretation in cancer research.

DNA-binding proteins

Systematic review of machine learning approaches for predicting sickle cell crisis and mortality risk at the climate-health nexus.

BACKGROUND: Sickle cell anemia (SCA) is a severe genetic blood disorder characterized by recurrent vaso-occlusive crises and increased mortality, with the greatest burden occurring in low- and middle-income countries. Climatic and environmental conditions, including temperature variability, humidity, rainfall, air pollution, and seasonal changes, have been associated with disease exacerbation. However, the extent to which these factors have been incorporated into predictive models remains unclear. This study systematically reviews the application of machine learning (ML) models for predicting SCA crises and mortality in relation to climate and environmental factors. METHODOLOGY: The PRISMA guidelines were used, and 34 peer-reviewed studies published between 2005 and 2026 were analyzed to identify the climate variables, ML approaches employed, and predictive performance. The reviewed studies applied a range of ML techniques, including artificial neural networks, random forests, support vector machines, decision trees, logistic regression, and deep learning models. Temperature, humidity, rainfall, wind speed, air quality indicators, and seasonal patterns were the most frequently examined environmental variables. RESULTS: The findings indicate that most existing models rely predominantly on clinical and demographic data, with limited integration of climate information and inadequate representation of high-burden regions, especially Sub-Saharan Africa. Studies incorporating environmental variables reported improved predictive performance and highlighted the potential of climate-informed early warning systems for SCA management. CONCLUSION: The review recommends development of interdisciplinary, climate-aware ML frameworks, expansion of longitudinal environmental datasets, and increased research in underrepresented regions to support climate-resilient and patient-centered SCA care.

Humans

Machine learning analysis of the human initiator region reveals key features of different types of core promoters.

The initiator (Inr) is the starting point for the transcription of many genes. Here, we generated highly predictive machine learning models of the human Inr region, and determined that the Inr is present in ∼60% of focused human promoters, identified a novel TATA-specific Inr, and detected the overlapping but functionally distinct TCT motif. Quantitative genome-wide analyses revealed a strict and synergistic interaction between the Inr and DPR, an inverse relationship between the TATA and DPR, a flexible and sometimes independent function of the TATA box in relation to the Inr, and different properties of the TCT motif in humans versus Drosophila.

Humans

Construction of precision clinical-proteomics risk model based on machine learning for predicting heart failure in type II diabetes mellitus.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Heart failure (HF) is a severe complication in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), but current risk stratification scores have limited predictive accuracy. We aimed to develop novel prediction tools integrating clinical variables with proteomics to improve risk stratification of hospitalization for HF in T2DM. METHODS AND RESULTS: In this study, we included 2111 UK Biobank participants with T2DM but no prior HF, and profiled 2920 proteins to predict 10-year incident HF hospitalization. Participants were randomly divided into training (70%), tuning (10%), and validation (20%) sets.Three prediction models were developed: a Clinical model based on demographic characteristics, comorbidities, medication use, and laboratory indices; a Protein model based on 40 proteins selected by the Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LGBM); and the Clinical OMics and Protein ASSessment for Heart Failure (COMPASS-HF) model, which integrated both clinical variables and the LGBM-selected proteins. Models were evaluated for area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity. During follow-up, 168 participants (7.96%) developed incident HF. The COMPASS-HF model showed better discrimination than the Clinical model, with an AUC of 0.897 (95% CI: 0.850-0.945) versus 0.790 (95% CI: 0.723-0.856). It also demonstrated higher sensitivity (0.882; 95% CI: 0.725-0.967) and consistent performance in subgroups. COMPASS-HF effectively stratified risk of hospitalization for HF, with cumulative incidence rates of 31.9% in the high-risk group and 1.2% in the low-risk group. CONCLUSIONS: By combining clinical and proteomic variables, we developed a high-performance HF prediction model for T2DM, enabling precise risk stratification and informing early intervention strategies.

Humans

Development and evaluation of a machine learning model for osteoporosis risk prediction in Korean women.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to develop a machine learning (ML) model for classifying osteoporosis in Korean women based on a large-scale population cohort study. This study also aimed to assess ML model performance compared with traditional osteoporosis screening tools. Furthermore, this study aimed to examine the factors influencing the risk of osteoporosis through variable importance. METHODS: Data was collected from 4199 women aged 40-69 years in the baseline survey of the Ansan and Ansung cohort of the Korean Genome and Epidemiology Study. Osteoporosis was set as the dependent variable to develop ML classification models. Independent variables included 122 factors related to osteoporosis risk, such as socio-demographic characteristics, anthropometric parameters, lifestyle factors, reproductive factors, nutrient intakes, diet quality indices, medical history, medication history, family history, biochemical parameters, and genetic factors. The six classification models were developed using ML techniques, including decision tree, random forest, multilayer perceptron, support vector machine, light gradient boosting machine, and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost). The six ML classification models were compared with two traditional osteoporosis screening tools, including the osteoporosis risk assessment instrument (ORAI) and the osteoporosis self-assessment tool (OST). The ML model performances were evaluated and compared using the confusion matrix and area under the curve (AUC) metrics. Variable importance was assessed using the XGBoost technique to investigate osteoporosis risk factors. RESULTS: The XGBoost model showed the highest performance out of the six ML classification models, with an accuracy of 0.705, precision of 0.664, recall of 0.830, and F1 score of 0.738. Moreover, the XGBoost model showed a higher performance on AUC than ORAI and OST. Variable importance scores were identified for 69 out of the 122 variables associated with osteoporosis risk factors. Age at menopause ranked first in variable importance. Variables of arthritis, physical activities, hypertension, education level, income level; alcohol intake, potassium intake, homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance; energy intake, vitamin C intake, gout; and dietary inflammatory index ranked in the top 20 out of the 69 variables, using the XGBoost technique. CONCLUSIONS: This study found that an XGBoost model can be utilized to classify osteoporosis in Korean women. Age at menopause is a significant factor in osteoporosis risk, followed by arthritis, physical activities, hypertension, and education level.

Humans

Machine learning-based clinical prediction model and multi-omics integration for assessing pancreatic cancer risk in new-onset diabetes.

BACKGROUND: Given that pancreatic cancer (PC) is typically diagnosed at an advanced stage but is often preceded by new-onset diabetes mellitus (NODM), providing a window for early detection, we sought to develop and validate an interpretable machine-learning model integrated with multi-omics profiling to identify early biomarkers of NODM-associated PC. METHODS: In a population-based cohort, individuals with NODM-associated PC and NODM without PC were identified and randomly divided (70:30) into training and validation sets after feature selection. Eight machine learning (ML) classifiers were compared using fivefold cross-validation, and model performance was evaluated in terms of discrimination, calibration, and decision curve–based clinical utility. We evaluated interpretability using the Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) analyses. Mechanistically, Olink proteomic profiling and metabolomics were analyzed through clinical classifications and model-defined risk strata. RESULTS: Categorical boosting achieved the best performance in the independent validation set (AUROC = 0.844). The NODM cohort was stratified into high- (n = 2,362) and low-risk (n = 5,030) groups, and internal validation together with SHAP analyses demonstrated consistent model performance and identified clinically interpretable predictors. Proteomic and metabolomic analyses under clinical and risk-based grouping identified 39 overlapping differentially expressed proteins and 145 overlapping metabolites with enriched across 11 shared KEGG pathways. Cross-platform validation highlighted PLTP, CRTAC1, and ITGAV as serum biomarkers with a strong potential for early NODM-PC detection. CONCLUSIONS: We developed an interpretable ML framework centered on NODM enables practical risk stratification for early PC detection by multi-omics and provides a pathway of ML-based triage followed by biomarker confirmation for earlier detection and diagnosis.

Humans

Machine learning for population-level risk prediction of future cholangiocarcinoma.

BACKGROUND: The poor prognosis of cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is largely driven by rapid, asymptomatic disease progression, which usually results in a late diagnosis in the absence of established screening strategies. An early, cost-effective, and universally applicable risk assessment strategy would therefore be valuable. METHODS: We developed machine learning (ML) models on prospective, multimodal data from 487,495 UK Biobank (UKB) participants, of whom 649 developed CCA during follow-up. Data from England (80%) were utilised for ML development via five-fold cross-validation, and then all models were tested on withheld data from Scotland, Wales, and Newcastle (20%). Iterative ablation studies reduced inputs from >150 features across demographic data, lifestyle, health records, blood parameters, genomics, and metabolomics to models built on five and ten routinely available clinical parameters. These were externally validated in the Penn Medicine Biobank (PMBB; n = 2638; 28 CCA), All of Us Research Program (AOU; n = 330,433; 362 CCA), Japan Medical Data Centre Claims Database (JMDC; n = 8,425,522; 723 CCA) and TriNetX (n = 728,886; 1592 CCA). FINDINGS: We show that ML models integrating biliary-disease associated health records and Gamma glutamyltransferase can stratify risk of future CCA. Evaluation on the UKB test set as well as three independent cohorts revealed robust performance and generalisability across ethnicities. We achieved AUROCs of 0.71 [95% CI: 0.703-0.711], 0.77 [95% CI: 0.764-0.778 ], 0.796 [95% CI: 0.795-0.798] and 0.8 [95% CI: 0.794-0.805] for UKB, PMBB, AOU, and JMDC respectively, with respective AUPRCs of 0.014 [95% CI: 0.009-0.018], 0.042 [95% CI: 0.037-0.048], 0.038 [95% CI: 0.033-0.042] and 0.001 [95% CI: 0.001-0.001]. In AOU, application of the Youden J-optimised threshold yielded a number needed to screen of 79. Separate models for intra- and extrahepatic CCA did not improve performance. In line with the pathophysiology, performance declined for longer intervals between assessment and event. A group-level analysis in the TriNetX cohort revealed hazard ratios of up to 82.5 [95% CI: 26.4-257.96]. We provide extensive interpretability results and release all source codes used to develop the presented models. INTERPRETATION: We provide a comprehensive framework for early CCA risk stratification in the general population, identifying key predictors, and demonstrating the potential of data-driven models in personalised screening for hepatobiliary cancer. FUNDING: German Cancer Aid (grant #70115730), Junior Principal Investigator Fellowship programme of RWTH Aachen Excellence strategy.

Humans

Comparing artificial and convolutional neural networks with traditional models for Genomic prediction in wheat.

With the rapid development of sequencing technology, the application of genomic prediction has become more and more common in breeding schemes of livestocks and crops. Selecting an appropriate statistical model is of central importance to achieve high prediction accuracy. Recently, machine learning models have been expected to upgrade genomic prediction into a new era. However, the perspective still suffers from lack of evidence that machine learning models can generally outperform the traditional ones on empirical data sets. In this study, we compared two machine learning models based on artificial neural network (ANN) and convolutional neural network (CNN) with four traditional models, including genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP), Bayesian ridge regression (BRR), BayesA and BayesB, using three published data sets for grain yield in wheat. For each model, we considered two variants: modeling and ignoring the genotype-by-environment ([Formula: see text]) interaction. In the comparison, we considered two strategies of cross-validation: predicting genotypes that have not been evaluated in any environment (CV1) and predicting genotypes that have been tested in other environments (CV2). Our results showed that traditional Bayesian models (BayesA, BayesB, and BRR) outperformed GBLUP, ANN and CNN when considering [Formula: see text] interaction. The accuracies of ANN and CNN were higher than traditional models only in CV1 and when [Formula: see text] interaction was ignored. It was also found that the performance of the two machine learning models was significantly affected by the interaction between the CV strategy and the way of treating the [Formula: see text] interaction, while that of the four traditional models was only influenced by whether the [Formula: see text] interaction was considered or not. Thus, machine learning models can be a powerful complementary to the traditional ones and their superiority may depend on the prediction scenario. Among the two machine learning models, we observed that the accuracy of ANN was higher than CNN in most cases, indicating that it is still challenging to adapt complex machine learning models such as CNN to genomic prediction.

ANN

Machine learning to differentiate colonization from infection in multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria: implications for further research.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Machine learning has emerged as a promising tool to support antimicrobial decision-making in infectious diseases. In colonized patients, distinguishing multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (MDR-GNB) colonization from true infection remains a major clinical challenge, as both delayed appropriate therapy in severe infections and unnecessary broad-spectrum antimicrobial use may adversely affect patient outcomes and antimicrobial stewardship. This review discusses the current evidence on machine learning models for predicting or detecting MDR-GNB infection in colonized patients, highlights key methodological limitations of the available literature, and outlines future research priorities. RECENT FINDINGS: Current evidence specifically evaluating machine learning models beyond logistic regression in MDR-GNB-colonized patients remains limited. Overall, while machine learning may achieve encouraging discriminatory performance, important methodological limitations persist. Most notably, predictive models are frequently developed in heterogeneous populations that do not reflect the clinically relevant populations of colonized patients in which treatment decisions are made. Furthermore, improvements in predictive performance remain modest, possibly reflecting limited sample sizes and data granularity rather than insufficient algorithmic complexity. In our opinion, future advances could require multicenter datasets enriched with longitudinal clinical, microbiological, and genomic information, together with automated feature extraction from electronic health records. SUMMARY: The main challenge for machine learning in predicting MDR-GNB infection in colonized patients may lie not in developing increasingly sophisticated algorithms, but in generating clinically representative datasets and adopting rigorous methodological standards for model development, validation, calibration, and implementation. Future research should prioritize clinically meaningful target populations and demonstrate improvements in patient outcomes and antimicrobial stewardship beyond conventional measures of predictive performance.

antimicrobial resistance

Machine learning-based prediction of unplanned readmission and construction of an online calculator for elderly patients with mild ischemic stroke.

OBJECTIVE: To screen for independent risk factors for unplanned readmission in elderly patients with mild ischemic stroke, and to construct and validate an online risk prediction calculator based on an interpretable machine learning model, thereby providing a promising practical tool for accurate clinical assessment of 30&#x2011;day all&#x2011;cause unplanned readmission risk in this population. METHODS: A prospective cohort study was conducted, including 1050 patients aged&#xa0;&#x2265;&#xa0;60&#xa0;years with mild ischemic stroke admitted between August 2023 and September 2024. Participants were randomly divided into a training set (840 cases) and a test set (210 cases) at a ratio of 8:2. Risk factors were screened by univariate analysis and multivariable Logistic regression. Four machine learning models, namely LightGBM, XGBoost, Random Forest, and K&#x2011;Nearest Neighbors (KNN), were developed and their performance was evaluated using AUC, accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity as metrics. The SHAP framework was used for interpretability analysis, and an online calculator was subsequently developed based on the optimal model. RESULTS: Univariate analysis showed significant differences (P&#xa0;<&#xa0;0.05) in 13 factors including age, smoking, AIP, TyG index, HALP score, etc. Multivariable Logistic regression identified age (OR&#xa0;=&#xa0;9.752), smoking (OR&#xa0;=&#xa0;5.171), AIP (OR&#xa0;=&#xa0;6.691), TyG index (OR&#xa0;=&#xa0;4.393), HALP score (OR&#xa0;=&#xa0;2.831), and&#xa0;&#x2265;&#xa0;2 comorbidities (OR&#xa0;=&#xa0;3.664) as independent risk factors. All four machine learning models demonstrated good predictive performance. Based on a comprehensive evaluation of multiple metrics and computational efficiency, the LightGBM model exhibited the best predictive performance (AUC&#xa0;=&#xa0;0.884, accuracy&#xa0;=&#xa0;0.829, sensitivity&#xa0;=&#xa0;0.812, specificity&#xa0;=&#xa0;0.875). SHAP analysis showed that age, AIP, TyG index, smoking, and HALP score were key predictors. An online calculator developed based on this model enables individualized risk predictions. CONCLUSION: Key risk factors associated with 30&#x2011;day unplanned readmission in elderly patients with mild ischemic stroke were identified. The LightGBM model demonstrated high predictive accuracy, and together with the interpretability analysis and online calculator, offers a practical tool to support clinical risk assessment. However, this tool requires future external validation.

Humans

Predicting cellular responses to perturbation across diverse contexts with State.

While machine learning models offer potential for predicting transcriptomic effects of perturbation, they currently struggle to generalize across cellular contexts. Here, we introduce State, a machine learning model that predicts perturbation effects while accounting for cellular heterogeneity within and across experiments. State is trained using single-cell gene expression data to predict perturbation effects across sets of cells. State improved discrimination of effects on large datasets by more than 30% and identified differentially expressed genes across genetic, signaling, and chemical perturbations with significantly improved accuracy compared with baselines. Its cell embeddings trained on observational data from 167 million cells enable the identification of strong perturbations in cellular contexts where no perturbations were observed during training. We further introduce Cell-Eval, a comprehensive evaluation framework that can be used to evaluate future models. Overall, the performance and flexibility of State set the stage for scaling the development of AI models of cell state.

Machine Learning

Prematurity and Genetic Liability for Autism Spectrum Disorder.

BACKGROUND: Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD) is a neurodevelopmental condition characterized by diverse presentations and a strong genetic component. Environmental factors, such as prematurity, have also been linked to increased liability for ASD, though the interaction between genetic predisposition and prematurity remains unclear. This study aims to investigate the impact of genetic liability and preterm birth on ASD conditions. METHODS: We analyzed phenotype and genetic data from two large ASD cohorts, the Simons Foundation Powering Autism Research for Knowledge (SPARK) and Simons Simplex Collection (SSC), encompassing 78,559 individuals for phenotype analysis, 12,519 individuals with genome sequencing data, and 8,104 individuals with exome sequencing data. Statistical significance of differences in clinical measures was evaluated between individuals with different ASD and preterm status. We assessed the rare variants burden using generalized estimating equations (GEE) models and polygenic load using ASD-associated polygenic risk score (PRS). Furthermore, we developed a machine learning model to predict ASD in preterm children using phenotype and genetic features available at birth. RESULTS: Individuals with both preterm birth and ASD exhibit more severe phenotypic outcomes despite similar levels of genetic liability for ASD across the term and preterm groups. Notably, preterm ASD individuals showed an elevated rate of de novo variants identified in exome sequencing (GEE model, p=0.005) in comparison to the non-ASD preterm group. Additionally, a GEE model showed that a higher ASD PRS, preterm birth, and male sex were positively associated with a higher predicted probability for ASD, reaching a probability close to 90% in SPARK. Lastly, we developed a machine learning model using phenotype and genetic features available at birth with limited predictive power (AUROC = 0.65). CONCLUSIONS: Preterm birth may exacerbate the multimorbidity present in ASD, which was not due to the ASD genetic factors. However, increased genetic factors may elevate the likelihood of a preterm child being diagnosed with ASD. Additionally, a polygenic load of ASD-associated variants had an additive role with preterm birth in the predicted probability for ASD, especially for boys. We propose that incorporating genetic assessment into neonatal care could benefit early ASD identification and intervention for preterm infants.

Autism Spectrum Disorder

Beyond predictive performance: A systematic review and critical methodological appraisal of AI/ML and conventional modelling strategies in breast, colorectal, and pancreatic Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Predictive modelling for cancer risk, treatment-related complications, and survival is central to precision oncology. Conventional logistic regression (LR) and Cox proportional hazards (CoxPH) regression remain widely used but are limited when modelling nonlinear interactions, high-dimensional imaging features, and multimodal clinical-metabolic predictors. Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) methods offer expanded capability through automated feature extraction, ensemble learning, and flexible survival modelling, but the evidence on when AI/ML adds value over conventional models across cancer sites and predictive tasks remains fragmented. OBJECTIVE: To systematically evaluate the methodological performance, validation strategies, and translational limitations of AI/ML models compared with conventional statistical models in published predictive-modelling studies for breast, colorectal, or pancreatic cancer. METHODS: PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched for studies published between January 2019 and March 2025. Two reviewers independently conducted title-and-abstract screening, full-text eligibility assessment, and PROBAST risk-of-bias assessment. Sixty-five studies (n&#xa0;=&#xa0;907,567 participants) were narratively synthesised by cancer site, predictive task, model family, comparator, validation strategy, predictor modality, and calibration or explainability reporting. RESULTS: The 65 studies comprised breast cancer (n&#xa0;=&#xa0;35), colorectal cancer (n&#xa0;=&#xa0;21), and pancreatic cancer (n&#xa0;=&#xa0;9). AI/ML superiority over LR and CoxPH was task- and data-dependent. CNN- and U-Net-based models predominated in imaging and body-composition tasks, tree-based ensembles consistently outperformed LR for tabular perioperative complication prediction, and CoxPH remained competitive, and in the largest pancreatic risk study, superior to XGBoost (C-index 0.802 vs 0.723) in well-structured datasets. PROBAST analysis-domain risk was moderate in 54 of 65 studies (83%), driven by limited external validation, sparse calibration reporting (11/65), and few decision-curve analyses (7/65). CONCLUSION: AI/ML adds the most methodological value in imaging-derived feature extraction and nonlinear perioperative prediction, while conventional regression remains preferable in large, structured datasets with linear predictors. Clinical translation requires standardised body-composition definitions, external validation, calibration assessment, decision-curve analysis, and explainability, in line with TRIPOD+AI and CLAIM standards.

Humans