SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “irinotecan”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

SourceResearch connectionFrom yearThrough year

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

11 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2026

UGT1A1 genotype testing for irinotecan: A guideline developed by the UK Centre of Excellence in Regulatory Science and Innovation in Pharmacogenomics (CERSI-PGx).

Irinotecan, a topoisomerase I inhibitor, is available as both non-pegylated and pegylated formulations. The non-pegylated formulation is licensed for use in advanced colorectal cancer either in combination with other agents or as monotherapy. However, it is also used off-label across a range of gastrointestinal malignancies and in rare malignancies such as glioblastoma and sarcomas. The pegylated formulation is licensed for use as combination therapy in adult patients with metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Irinotecan is hydrolysed to its active metabolite, SN-38, which is predominantly inactivated by the enzyme uridine diphosphate glucuronosyltransferase UGT1A1. UGT1A1 is encoded by the gene UGT1A1, which is polymorphically expressed, with allele frequencies varying across populations. Poor metabolizers carry two variants that reduce UGT1A1 enzyme expression or activity, leading to increased risk of irinotecan toxicity. Any patient who is about to be prescribed irinotecan for an epithelial malignancy should have pharmacogenetic testing, to identify clinically relevant UGT1A1 variants, where testing is available. Irinotecan dose should be reduced by 30% at Cycle 1 treatment in poor metabolizers for all indications, with doses titrated thereafter based on tolerability and neutrophil counts. The lack of evidence precludes us from making any recommendation for rare malignancies such as sarcomas. Our guideline is consistent with other international pharmacogenetics prescribing guidelines. This guideline is grounded in the latest evidence but cannot account for all individual factors relevant to patient care. Therefore, prescribers must conduct a thorough assessment of each patient's risk-benefit profile, ensuring that therapy is optimized to maximize benefits while minimizing potential harms.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

A multicenter phase II trial of ramucirumab plus irinotecan for early recurrence of gastric cancer during or after adjuvant chemotherapy with docetaxel plus S-1 therapy: the RAMIEL trial (OGSG1901).

BACKGROUND: There is currently no established chemotherapy regimen for early recurrence of pathological stage III gastric cancer (GC) following adjuvant chemotherapy with docetaxel plus S-1 (DS) after D2 gastrectomy. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ramucirumab plus irinotecan in patients with GC who experienced early recurrence during or within 6 months after DS adjuvant chemotherapy. METHODS: This prospective, open-label, multicenter phase II trial enrolled eligible patients treated at 25 centers of the Osaka Gastrointestinal Cancer Chemotherapy Study Group in Japan. Patients received ramucirumab (8 mg/kg) and irinotecan (150 mg/m2) every 2 weeks. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), and secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and safety. The sample size was set at 40 based on a threshold median OS of 7 months and an expected median OS of 11 months, with a one-sided alpha error of 0.05 and a power of 0.80. RESULTS: Between November 2019 and July 2023, 43 patients were enrolled, and 39 were included in the analysis after excluding three ineligible patients and one who did not initiate protocol treatment. The median OS was 15.9 months (95% CI: 8.8-42.0; p = 0.003). The median PFS was 5.5 months (95% CI: 3.9-8.1), and the ORR was 38.5%. Grade  ≥ 3 adverse events, including neutropenia (25.6%) and hypertension (25.6%), were observed in more than 20% of patients. CONCLUSION: Ramucirumab plus irinotecan demonstrated promising efficacy and manageable toxicity in patients with early recurrence of GC following adjuvant DS therapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was prospectively registered in the Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (jRCTs05119071, October 6, 2019, https://jrct.niph.go.jp/latest-detail/jRCTs051190071 ).

Docetaxel↗

PubMed2026

Impact of Tumor Genomic Profile on Adjuvant Chemotherapy Efficacy in Resected Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: Results From the PRODIGE-24/CCTG PA6 Study.

PURPOSE: Modified fluorouracil, leucovorin, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin (mFOLFIRINOX/mFFX) is the standard adjuvant chemotherapy for resected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), offering survival benefits over gemcitabine (GEM). However, the contribution of molecular biomarkers to treatment selection remains unclear. Here, we characterize the molecular landscape of tumors from the PRODIGE-24/CCTG PA6 trial and assess the clinical impact of genomic alterations and molecular subtypes. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Tumor DNA sequencing was successfully performed in 317/350 tumors (168 mFFX; 149 GEM), complemented by transcriptomic subtyping using the PurIST classifier. Mutational status of four key PDAC driver genes and 24 homologous recombination repair (HRR)-associated genes was analyzed, alongside single-base substitution (SBS) mutational signatures. Primary and secondary end points were disease-free survival (DFS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS), respectively. RESULTS: In the mFFX group, the PurIST subtype was prognostic, with classical tumors showing superior DFS compared with basal-like tumors (stratified hazard ratio [sHR], 0.48 [95% CI, 0.31 to 0.77]). Among KRAS-mutated patients, mFFX significantly improved DFS compared with GEM (sHR, 0.60 [95% CI, 0.45 to 0.79]; P < .001), while no benefit was observed in KRAS wild-type tumors (interaction test, Pint. = 0.010). HRR and BRCA status were not predictive (Pint. = .568 and Pint. = .785, respectively). The benefit of mFFX was consistent across SBS-positive and SBS-negative subgroups. CONCLUSION: Overall, these results do not support a change in current adjuvant treatment strategies. mFFX remains the standard adjuvant regimen in PDAC, and the observed lack of benefit in KRAS wild-type tumors should be considered hypothesis-generating and warrants further investigation.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Addition of High-Dose Vitamin D3 to Standard Treatment in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: The SOLARIS Randomized Clinical Trial (Alliance A021703).

IMPORTANCE: In a phase 2 randomized clinical trial, high-dose vitamin D3 added to standard treatment improved progression-free survival (PFS) compared with standard-dose vitamin D3 in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). OBJECTIVE: To determine if high-dose vitamin D3 added to standard chemotherapy improves outcomes in patients with previously untreated mCRC. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Double-blind phase 3 randomized clinical trial enrolling 455 patients with previously untreated mCRC, conducted in the US through the National Clinical Trials Network from October 2019 to December 2022 (database freeze: July 15, 2024). INTERVENTIONS: mFOLFOX6 (modified FOLFOX6 [5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin]) or FOLFIRI (5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, irinotecan) plus bevacizumab every 2 weeks with either high-dose vitamin D3 (8000 IU daily × 14 days as loading dose followed by 4000 IU daily) or standard-dose vitamin D3 (400 IU daily) until disease progression, intolerable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary end point was PFS assessed by the unstratified log-rank test. Secondary end points included objective response rate, overall survival, and toxicity. Prespecified subgroup analyses of PFS were performed according to known prognostic factors. RESULTS: Among 455 randomized patients (median age, 59 years; 181 [40%] female) with median follow-up 20 months, the median PFS for high-dose vitamin D3 (n = 228) was 11.8 months (95% CI, 10.3-13.3) vs 10.3 months (95% CI, 9.4-12.2) for standard-dose vitamin D3 (n = 227) (1-sided log-rank P = .25). There were no significant differences in objective response rate between high-dose and standard-dose vitamin D3 (51% [95% CI, 44%-58%] vs 44% [95% CI, 37%-50%], respectively; P = .12), or in overall survival (median, 25.6 vs 27.0 months; 1-sided log-rank P = .66). There were no clinically meaningful differences in the most common grade 3 or greater adverse events between the high- and standard-dose groups, including neutropenia (n = 67 [32%] vs n = 62 [30%]) and hypertension (n = 42 [20%] vs n = 49 [23%]) or in incidence of vitamin D-associated toxicities. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Among patients with previously untreated mCRC, addition of high-dose vitamin D3, vs standard-dose vitamin D3, to standard chemotherapy plus bevacizumab did not improve PFS. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04094688.

Aged↗

PubMed2024

Construction and Analysis of a Mitochondrial Metabolism-Related Prognostic Model for Breast Cancer to Evaluate Survival and Immunotherapy.

As one of the most prevalent malignancies among women, breast cancer (BC) is tightly linked to metabolic dysfunction. However, the correlation between mitochondrial metabolism-related genes (MMRGs) and BC remains unclear. The training and validation datasets for BC were obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas and Gene Expression Omnibus databases, respectively. MMRG-related data were obtained from the Molecular Signatures Database. A risk score prognostic model incorporating MMRGs was established based on univariate, LASSO, and multivariate Cox regression analyses. Independent factors affecting BC prognosis were identified through regression analysis and presented in a nomogram. Single-sample gene set enrichment analysis was employed to assess the immune levels of high-risk (HR) and low-risk (LR) groups. The sensitivity of BC patients in the two groups to common anti-tumor drugs was evaluated by utilizing the Genomics of Drug Sensitivity in Cancer database. 12 MMRGs significantly associated with survival were selected from 1234 MMRGs. A 12-gene risk score prognostic model was built. In the multivariate regression analysis incorporating classical clinical factors, the MMRG-related risk score remained an independent prognostic factor. As revealed by tumor immune microenvironment analysis, the LR group with higher survival rates had elevated immune levels. The drug sensitivity results unmasked that the LR group demonstrated higher sensitivity to Irinotecan, Nilotinib, and Oxaliplatin, while the HR group demonstrated higher sensitivity to Lapatinib. The development of MMRG characteristics provides a comprehensive understanding of mitochondrial metabolism in BC, aiding in the prediction of prognosis and tumor microenvironment, and offering promising therapeutic choices for BC patients with different MMRG risk scores.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Ifebemtinib plus garsorasib in previously treated metastatic colorectal cancer with KRASG12C mutation: a multicentre, randomised, phase 1b/2 trial.

BACKGROUND: Ifebemtinib is a potent oral focal adhesion kinase inhibitor. Preclinical evidence supports combining ifebemtinib with the KRASG12C inhibitor garsorasib. This study aimed to evaluate this combination in KRASG12C-mutated solid tumours. METHODS: This multicentre, phase 1b/2 study had a phase 1b component to establish the recommended phase 2 dose and a phase 2 multitumour expansion component. In phase 1b, the safety and tolerability of ifebemtinib combined with garsorasib was assessed using a 3 + 3 design in KRASG12C-mutated solid tumours. No dose-limiting toxic effects were observed, and the recommended phase 2 dose was established as ifebemtinib 100 mg orally once daily plus garsorasib 600 mg orally twice daily. Here, we report the results of the cohort of previously treated KRASG12C-mutated metastatic colorectal cancer from phase 2 expansion. Eligible patients (aged ≥18 years) who had histologically confirmed locally advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer harbouring the KRASG12C mutation, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance-status score of 0 or 1, and had disease progression after previous irinotecan-based or oxaliplatin-based combination therapy, were recruited from seven of nine participating tertiary hospitals in China. On the basis of the recommended phase 2 dose, phase 2 comprised a single-arm study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ifebemtinib combined with garsorasib and an open-label, randomised study in which patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive ifebemtinib plus garsorasib or garsorasib alone, by use of centralised computer-generated block randomisation with no stratification. Investigators were masked to the block size. The primary efficacy endpoint of phase 2 was investigator-assessed objective response rate (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours, version 1.1), assessed in the safety analysis set in the single-arm study and in all randomly assigned patients (intention-to-treat population) in the randomised study. At least six objective responses (safety analysis set) were required in the single-arm study to proceed to the randomised study. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT06166836 and NCT05379946, and is active but not recruiting. FINDINGS: Between April 7, 2023 and Dec 13, 2024, 51 patients were enrolled in phase 2 (15 in the single-arm study and 36 in the randomised study). In the single-arm study, the median age was 53 years (IQR 39 to 63), nine (60%) patients were female, six (40%) were male, and all were Asian. In the randomised study, the median age was 51 years (IQR 42 to 59) in the combination group and 63 years (IQR 54 to 66) in the monotherapy group, 24 (67%) were female, 12 (33%) were male, and all patients were Asian. In the single-arm part, the confirmed objective response rate was 46·7% (95% CI 21·3 to 73·4). Seven patients had partial responses, triggering progression to the randomised study. In the randomised study, the confirmed objective response rate was 38·9% (95% CI 17·3 to 64·3) with the combination therapy versus 16·7% (95% CI 3·6 to 41·4) with garsorasib alone (between-group difference 22·2%, 95% CI -7·7 to 49·1; one-sided p=0·068). In the single-arm study, grade 3 treatment-related adverse events occurred in four (27%) of 15 patients, and in the randomised study, grade 3 treatment-related adverse events occurred in six (33%) of 18 patients in the combination group and five (28%) of 18 in the garsorasib group. Grade 3 treatment-related adverse events occurring in at least two patients were diarrhoea (six [18%]), proteinuria (two [6%]), and intestinal obstruction (two [6%]) in patients treated with combination therapy (combined), and increased alanine aminotransferase and γ-glutamyltransferase (two [11%] each) in patients treated with garsorasib alone. Serious adverse events occurred in ten (30%) patients in the combination group and in four (22%) patients in the monotherapy group. One patient in the garsorasib monotherapy group died due to the underlying malignancy within 30 days after completing study treatment, which was reported as a serious adverse event. The death was assessed by the investigators as not related to garsorasib. No grade 4 treatment-related adverse events or treatment-related deaths were reported across all cohorts. INTERPRETATION: The combination of ifebemtinib and garsorasib showed promising anticancer activity and manageable safety profile in previously treated patients with KRASG12C-mutated metastatic colorectal cancer. Although the improvement in response rate did not reach statistical significance in the randomised study, these findings support further evaluation of ifebemtinib plus garsorasib in this population. FUNDING: InxMed, InventisBio, National Natural Science Foundation of China, the Jian Bing Ling Yan + X Research and Development Program of Zhejiang Province, and the Zhejiang Province Medical and Health Science and Technology Plan Project.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Randomized phase-II trial of surufatinib plus FOLFOX/FOLFIRI versus FOLFOXIRI as second-line therapy for metastatic colorectal cancer.

BACKGROUND: Second-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) typically involves oxaliplatin- or irinotecan-based doublet chemotherapy with or without anti-angiogenic antibodies. Triplet regimens such as FOLFOXIRI have demonstrated synergy and improved efficacy as first-line therapy. Surufatinib, an oral multi-kinase inhibitor targeting VEGFR1-3, FGFR1, and CSF-1R, may enhance chemotherapy efficacy. We evaluated surufatinib combined with doublet (FOLFOX/FOLFIRI) versus triplet (FOLFOXIRI) chemotherapy as second-line treatment for mCRC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This multicentre, open-label, randomized phase-II trial used Simon's minimax two-stage design. Eligible patients had mCRC progressing on or within 6 months after first-line doublet chemotherapy. Patients were randomized 1:1 to surufatinib 250 mg once daily plus either mFOLFOX6/FOLFIRI (doublet cohort, selected based on prior regimen) or FOLFOXIRI (triplet cohort). The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR). RESULTS: From September 2021 to November 2023, 57 patients were randomized (28 per cohort after one withdrawal). In the doublet cohort, ORR was 35.7% (95% CI: 18.6-55.9), median progression-free survival (PFS) was 5.4 months (95% CI: 3.8-7.0), and median overall survival (OS) was 19.0 months (95% CI: 9.2-28.8). In the triplet cohort, ORR was 39.3% (95% CI: 21.5-59.4), median PFS was 5.8 months (95% CI: 3.3-8.2), and median OS was 10.9 months (95% CI: 6.0-15.8). Grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events occurred more frequently in the triplet (71.4%) versus doublet (57.1%) cohort, with higher rates of treatment delays (89.3% versus 72.0%) and discontinuations (25.0% versus 14.3%). CONCLUSIONS: Surufatinib plus doublet chemotherapy showed encouraging antitumor activity and acceptable tolerability in second-line mCRC, warranting further evaluation in a larger randomized trial. In contrast, surufatinib plus triplet chemotherapy was associated with increased toxicity, more frequent treatment delays or discontinuations, and shorter overall survival; this combination is not recommended for further investigation in this setting.ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04734249Date of registration: January 31, 2021.

Humans↗

PubMed2025

Construction and accuracy assessment of an efferocytosis-related prognostic model for ovarian cancer: A diagnostic accuracy study.

The study aimed to investigate the prognostic significance of efferocytosis-related genes in ovarian cancer (OC) with regard to cancer development, progression, invasion, and metastasis. OC cohorts were assembled from bioinformatics repositories. Utilizing consensus clustering analysis, distinct clusters were delineated based on the intersection of OC-related genes and efferocytosis-related genes. A prognostic signature specific to efferocytosis in OC was developed using data from The Cancer Genome Atlas, validated against the gene expression omnibus database, and subjected to independent prognostic analysis. Subsequently, a nomogram model was formulated. Moreover, investigations encompassed the immune microenvironment, immunotherapy, mutation profiling, drug sensitivity assessments, drug prediction models, and molecular docking analyses. Finally, quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) assays were employed to ascertain the mRNA expression levels of key genes. Five key genes, FCGBP, BTN3A3, WDR91, SLC25A45, and BTNL3, were identified as significantly associated with OC. Both datasets and qRT-PCR demonstrated elevated expression levels of FCGBP and WDR91 in OC. Notably, AFLATOXIN B1 exhibited strong binding affinity to SLC25A45, ciclopirox to BTN3A3, and irinotecan to WDR91. The risk score, age, and stage were identified as independent prognostic factors, with the nomogram displaying efficacy in predicting OC patient survival. Variations in the immune cell infiltration profiles, including naive B cells, and expression levels of 6 immune checkpoint genes, such as CTLA4, were notable. High tumor mutation burden scores were associated with improved survival outcomes. Additionally, significant differences in the IC50 values of 123 anticancer drugs were observed between the 2 risk groups. This findings of this study highlight the efficacy of the efferocytosis-associated risk model in predicting the survival outcomes of OC patients, thus providing a novel reference for prognostic prediction in OC patients.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor mediates peripheral-central neuroimmune crosstalk in autoimmune thyroid diseases.

BACKGROUND: Organ-specific autoimmune diseases, particularly Graves' disease (GD) and its extrathyroidal manifestation, Graves' orbitopathy (GO), are characterized by systemic autoimmunity that may extend its impact to the central nervous system (CNS). While thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor (TSHR) is the primary driver of pathological remodeling in the thyroid and orbital tissues, emerging evidence suggests it is also expressed in the brain and may participate in neuroimmune signaling. However, the molecular mechanisms linking peripheral TSHR-driven autoimmunity to these extended systemic features remain unclear. Thus, GD and GO provide a unique window to investigate how peripheral autoantibodies influence CNS involvement as part of its broader pathological spectrum. METHODS: Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) and post-GWAS analyses were integrated with bulk RNA sequencing, single-cell and spatial transcriptomics, and brain imaging phenotypes to comprehensively characterize peripheral and central alterations in GD and GO. Mendelian randomization was applied to test causal relationships between genetic variants and brain signatures. Structural biology analyses were further conducted including protein-protein docking, small-molecule docking, and normal mode dynamics to identify prospective modulators of TSHR. Immunofluorescence staining was performed in a GO mouse model to validate the colocalization of potential interacted proteins in the specific brain region. RESULTS: Brain imaging-derived phenotypes (IDPs) alterations in GO and GO were systematically analyzed to identify neuroanatomical and functional alterations. TSHR was further identified as a shared genetic driver across peripheral and central compartments. TSHR was expressed in spiny projection neurons, microglia, and peripheral T cells, with cell-cell communication analyses highlighting TSHR-mediated interactions among neurons, endothelial cells, and microglia. Immunofluorescence staining in a GO mouse model confirmed the colocalization of TSHR with FN1 and GNAS in the basal ganglia, providing tissue-level validation of the computationally predicted ligand-receptor interactions. Immune profiling further showed immune alterations in GD and GO. Structural modeling supported plausible physical interfaces between TSHR and interacting proteins, and small-molecule screening identified three repurposable compounds - venetoclax, irinotecan, and dutasteride - with predicted favorable docking scores and stable binding poses in our simulations. CONCLUSIONS: These findings demonstrate that TSHR acts as a molecular hub mediating peripheral-central neuroimmune crosstalk in GD and GO. The results support a broader "disease-molecule axis" framework that links genetic susceptibility with multi-level immune and neural mechanisms. This work provides mechanistic insights relevant to the development of TSHR-targeted therapies, with implications for both peripheral immune modulation and central regulation. However, the limited sample size, lack of longitudinal follow-up, and absence of in vivo validation warrant cautious interpretation and further investigation.

Receptors, Thyrotropin↗

PubMed2026

Systemic treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer: A Comprehensive Review.

IMPORTANCE: Pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is an uncommon but potentially catastrophic diagnosis with historically poor prognosis. It is the tenth most prevalent cancer in the US & UK. Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is one of the most lethal malignancies worldwide, with a five-year survival rate of approximately 10%. Despite increasing understanding of its molecular biology, systemic treatment options for advanced disease remain limited, and survival outcomes have improved only modestly over the past decade. OBSERVATIONS: This narrative review traces the evolution of systemic therapy for advanced PDAC from gemcitabine monotherapy through the landmark FOLFIRINOX (PRODIGE trial) and gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel (MPACT trial) combination regimens, which remain the standard of care. Second-line options including liposomal irinotecan plus 5-FU/LV (NAPOLI-1) and maintenance olaparib for germline BRCA1/2-mutated disease (POLO) are also reviewed. Emerging data on sequential treatment strategies (SEQUENCE trial), biomarker-driven treatment selection (PRIMUS-001, PASS-01), and precision medicine approaches targeting actionable molecular subgroups, including dMMR/MSI-H, NTRK fusions, and homologous recombination deficiency are discussed. Real-world evidence comparing FOLFIRINOX and gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel is critically appraised, including the challenges of patient selection, tolerance, and applicability outside clinical trial settings. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: Despite incremental progress, the treatment landscape of advanced PDAC remains challenging. Molecular stratification and biomarker-driven precision oncology represent the most promising path forward. This review serves as a clinical reference for physicians managing advanced pancreatic cancer, highlighting current evidence, evidence limitations, and future research priorities including prospective biomarker-driven trials and improved access to genomic testing.

Biomarkers↗

PubMed2026

Development of a PCR-based technique for genotyping UGT1A1 gene and distribution of rs3064744 alleles in the Russian population.

BACKGROUND: Accurate determination of tandem thymine-adenine (TA) repeat numbers in the UGT1A1 promoter region (rs3064744) is essential for diagnosing Gilbert's syndrome and personalizing therapy with toxic agents like irinotecan and atazanavir. However, traditional polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assays face severe limitations due to the AT-rich sequence and overlapping melting temperatures (Tm) of the highly homologous 7TA and 8TA alleles. In this context, melting curve analysis (MCA) employing fluorophore-quencher systems has emerged as a promising alternative. The purpose of this study was to develop a novel genotyping approach combining optimized aPCR-MCA analysis with an automated classifier to overcome the limitations posed by the differentiation of highly homologous alleles and to demonstrate its practical application, providing the distribution of rs3064744 genotypes across four regional cohorts of the Russian population. METHODS: A specialized Dual Head 1D-convolutional neural network (1D-CNN) ensemble with Test-Time Augmentation (TTA) was developed. The model was trained and internally validated on 1,620 engineered plasmid samples, and independently evaluated on an external clinical test set of 440 unique patient genomic DNA specimens. Real-time PCR was performed on CFX96 and DTprime platforms. Additionally, population-wide screening was conducted on 997 archival clinical samples from Moscow, Sakha (Yakutia), Dagestan, and Rostov regions. RESULTS: While 5TA and 6TA alleles were easily separated, absolute Tm distributions of 7TA and 8TA alleles overlapped significantly, and non-uniform Tm shifts of 0.8 °C-1.4 °C occurred across platforms. Conventional absolute Tm thresholding was therefore inadequate. By assessing relative morphological curve divergence against co-amplified 7TA/7TA and 7TA/8TA reference anchors, the 1D-CNN ensemble neutralized instrument noise. It achieved 100% accuracy on internal validation and 100% concordance (440/440) with clinical reference pyrosequencing. Population screening revealed that Dagestan, Yakutia, and Rostov cohorts closely align with the European population. Rare 5TA and 8TA alleles were detected at low frequencies in Yakutia and Moscow. CONCLUSION: Combining LNA-modified aPCR-MCA with a comparative 1D-CNN model successfully circumvents thermodynamic limitations and eliminates human operator bias. This integrated system offers an accessible, high-throughput, and clinically valid solution for routine UGT1A1 pharmacogenetic testing.

1D-CNN↗