Imprinting the genome: imprinted genes, imprinting genes, and a hypothesis for their interaction.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Animals↗
SEARCH · Search PubMed
Results for “imprinted gene”
Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Comparative phylogenetic analysis of blcap/nnat reveals eutherian-specific imprinted gene.
Imprinted genes are parent-of-origin dependent, monoallelically expressed genes present in marsupials and eutherian mammals. Altered expression of imprinted genes plays a significant role in the etiology of a variety of human disorders and diseases. Nevertheless, the regulatory mechanisms of imprinting remain poorly defined. The imprinted gene Neuronatin (Nnat) is an excellent candidate for studying imprinting because it resides within the 8.5-kb intron of the nonimprinted gene Bladder Cancer-Associated Protein (Blcap) and is the only imprinted gene within the region. A phylogenetic comparison of this micro-imprinted domain in human, mouse, and rat revealed several candidates for imprint control, including tandem repeats and putative binding sites for trans- acting factors known to be involved in chromatin remodeling. Genome-wide phylogenetic comparisons of species from the three major extant mammalian clades failed, however, to show any evidence of Nnat outside the eutherian lineage. Thus, Nnat is the first identified eutherian-specific imprinted gene, demonstrating that imprinted genes did not arise at a single point during evolution. This finding also suggests that the complexity of imprinting regulation observed at other loci may, in part, be directly related to the amount of time they have been imprinted.
Animals↗
Subtraction-hybridization method for the identification of imprinted genes.
Imprinted genes show monoallelic expression from either the paternal or maternal genome (1,2), and their regulated expression is usually associated with the existence of parentally differentially methylated regions on genomic DNAs (3,4). Because of this, essentially two different approaches, using either cDNA or genomic DNA as starting material (5) have been developed for systematic isolation of imprinted genes. In this chapter, we describe a subtraction-hybridization method (6-8) as an example of the former approach. Both parthenogenetic embryos and androgenetic embryos (9,10) are the most suitable biological materials for the subtraction or detection of imprinted genes. However, it is difficult to obtain a large amount of such special materials because only a small number of these embryos develop to the d 10 stage (9,10). Thus, polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based techniques, such as the differential display (11-13) and subtraction-hybridization methods, are necessary to accomplish this experiment. The subtraction-hybridization method has been successfully applied for isolation of both paternally expressed genes (Pegs) (6,14,15) and maternally expressed genes (Megs) (7), and it allows cDNA libraries to be made from a very small amount of biological material. We are convinced that this method can be applied in many fields of biological science.
Animals↗
Expression profiling of uniparental mouse embryos is inefficient in identifying novel imprinted genes.
Imprinted genes are expressed from only one allele in a parent-of-origin-specific manner. We here describe a systematic approach to identify novel imprinted genes using quantification of allele-specific expression by Pyrosequencing, a highly accurate method to detect allele-specific expression differences. Sixty-eight candidate imprinted transcripts mapping to known imprinted chromosomal regions were selected from a recent expression profiling study of uniparental mouse embryos and analyzed. Three novel imprinted transcripts encoding putative non-protein-coding RNAs were identified on the basis of parent-of-origin-specific monoallelic expression in E11.5 (C57BL/6 x Cast/Ei)F1 and informative (C57BL/6 x Cast/Ei) x C57BL/6 backcross embryos. In addition, four transcripts with preferential expression of a strain-specific allele were found. Intriguingly, a vast majority of the analyzed transcripts showed no imprinting-associated expression in F1 embryos. These data strengthen the view that a large fraction of nonimprinted genes is differentially expressed between parthenogenetic and androgenetic embryos and question the efficiency of expression profiling of uniparental embryos to identify novel imprinted genes.
Alleles↗
Bidirectional action of the Igf2r imprint control element on upstream and downstream imprinted genes.
Imprinting of the maternally-expressed Igf2r gene is controlled by an intronic imprint control element (ICE) known as Region2 that contains the promoter of the noncoding Air RNA, whose transcript overlaps the silenced paternal Igf2r promoter in an antisense orientation. Two novel imprinted genes, Slc22a2 and Slc22a3 are described here that lie 110 and 155 kb 3' to Igf2r and that are not overlapped by the Air transcript but are regulated by the Igf2r-ICE, as previously shown for Igf2r. These results identify a new cluster of imprinted genes whose repression by the bidirectional action of the Region2-ICE is independent of transcript overlap by the Air RNA.
Animals↗
Mouse Peg9/Dlk1 and human PEG9/DLK1 are paternally expressed imprinted genes closely located to the maternally expressed imprinted genes: mouse Meg3/Gtl2 and human MEG3.
BACKGROUND: Genomic imprinting significantly influences development, growth and behaviour in mammals. Systematic screening of imprinted genes has been extensively carried out to identify the genes responsible for imprinted phenotypes and to elucidate the biological significance of this phenomenon. In this study, we applied DNA chip technology for isolating paternally expressed imprinted genes (Pegs). We compared the resulting expression profiles of parthenogenetic and fertilized control embryos to identify novel imprinted genes. RESULTS: A novel paternally expressed mouse imprinted gene, Peg9/Dlk1, was identified. Consistent with this finding, the paternal expression of its human homologue, PEG9/DLK1, was also confirmed. These two genes form imprinted gene clusters with the reciprocally imprinted mouse Meg3/Gtl2 and human MEG3 genes that we first identified on distal chromosome 12 and chromosome 14q32, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: As DNA chip technology allows us to quickly screen a large number of genes, using this technology to search for imprinted genes could accelerate the identification of genes responsible for human and mouse genetic diseases. Dlk1 and DLK1, which encode transmembrane proteins, have six EGF-like repeats and show homology to the Delta gene in Drosophila melanogaster. Because of its homology to mammalian Delta homologues, PEG9/DLK1 may contribute to the scoliosis phenotype observed in maternal uniparental disomy 14 (mUPD14) patients.
Animals↗
Computation method to identify differential allelic gene expression and novel imprinted genes.
MOTIVATION: Genomic imprinting plays an important role in both normal development and diseases. Abnormal imprinting is strongly associated with several human diseases including cancers. Most of the imprinted genes were discovered in the neighborhood of the known imprinted genes. This approach is difficult to extend to analyze the whole genome. We have decided to take a computational approach to systematically search the whole genome for the presence of mono-allelic expressed genes and imprinted genes in human genome. RESULTS: A computational method was developed to identify novel imprinted or mono-allelic genes. Individuals represented in human cDNA libraries were genotyped using Bayesian statistics, and differential expression of polymorphic alleles was identified. A significant reduction in the number of libraries that expressed both alleles, measured by Z-statistics, is a strong indicator for an imprinted or a mono-allelic gene. AVAILABILITY: The data sets are available at http://leelab.nci.nih.gov/leelab/jsp/IGDM/IGDM.html
Algorithms↗
Igf-2r expression regulated by epigenetic modification and the locus of gene imprinting disrupted in cloned cattle.
Epigenetic reprogramming has a crucial role in establishing nuclear totipotency in normal development and in cloned animals. Insulin-like growth factor-2 receptor (Igf-2r) is a tissue-specifically and species-dependently imprinted gene, regulated by epigenetic modifications. The diversity of Igf-2r imprinting suggests that the success of animal cloning may be species-dependent. To determine the relation between epigenetic modifications and Igf-2r expression in cattle, and explore whether this gene was correctly imprinted and reprogrammed after nuclear transfer, we quantified Igf-2r mRNA in a cattle cell line after treated with an inhibitor of DNA methylation transferase or an inhibitor of histone deacetylase, and confirmed that DNA methylation and histone acetylation could regulate this gene expression. CpG island searching showed that there is a conservative imprinting control region (ICR) within the second intron of Igf-2r in cattle, analogous to mice and sheep, regulating this gene imprinting. DNA methylation analysis in sperm and blood cells showed that DNA methylation at Igf-2r ICR2 was reprogrammed in normal cattle. The methylation at Igf-2r ICR2 showed significant variation in tissues, such as blood, liver, brain, heart and heart. It suggested that Igf-2r imprinting was tissue-specifically regulated. In cloned cattle, DNA methylation at Igf-2r ICR2 was markedly altered in comparison with normal fetus, while patterns of DNA methylation at Igf-2r 3'-UTR (3-terminal untranslated region) were similar to normal fetus, it indicated that 3'-UTR was not significantly altered by cloning procedures, but DNA methylation at the locus of gene imprinting was disrupted and not completely reprogrammed after nuclear transfer.
Animals↗
Use of a novel system for defining a gene imprinting region.
Gene imprinting involves the expression of a single allele, depending on its parental origin. In this report, we describe the use of a novel system, implementing human tissues exclusively endowed with either maternally or paternally inherited chromosomes, to better define a known gene imprinting region. Specific RNA transcripts for Placental Ribonuclease Inhibitor (PRI) and Cathepsin D were analysed by northern blotting for expression in complete hydatidiform mole, mature teratoma, and normal placenta. These genes are in close proximity to the reciprocally imprinted H19 and IGF-2 genes found on chromosome 11p15.5. Since all the tissues studied expressed Cathepsin D and PRI, these are not, by definition, imprinted, but as yet we cannot define the borders of the imprinting area on chromosome 11p15.5.
Alleles↗
Lessons from comparative analysis of species-specific imprinted genes.
Genomic imprinting is generally believed to be conserved in all mammals except for egg-laying monotremes, suggesting that it is closely related to placental and fetal growth. As expected, the imprinting status of most imprinted genes is conserved between mouse and human, and some are imprinted even in marsupials. On the other hand, a small number of genes were reported to exhibit species-specific imprinting that is not necessarily accounted for by either the placenta or conflict hypotheses. Since mouse and human represent a single, phylogenetically restricted clade in the mammalian class, a much broader comparison including mammals diverged earlier than rodents is necessary to fully understand the species-specificity and variation in evolution of genomic imprinting. Indeed, comparative analysis of a species-specific imprinted gene Impact using a broader range of mammals led us to propose an alternative dosage control hypothesis for the evolution of genomic imprinting.
Animals↗
Relaxation of insulin-like growth factor II gene imprinting implicated in Wilms' tumour.
Genomic imprinting has been implicated in the onset of several embryonal tumours but the mechanism is not well understood. Maternal chromosome 11p15 loss of heterozygosity and paternal chromosome 11 isodisomy suggest that imprinted genes are involved in the onset of Wilms' tumour and the Beckwith-Wiedemann syndrome. The insulin-like growth factor II (IGF2) gene located at 11p15.5 has been put forward as a candidate gene as it is maternally imprinted (paternally expressed) in the mouse, and is expressed at high levels in Wilms' tumours. We report here that the IGF2 gene is expressed from the paternal allele in human fetal tissue, but that in Wilms' tumour expression can occur biallelically. These results provide, to our knowledge, the first evidence that relaxation of imprinting may play a role in the onset of disease and suggest a new genetic mechanism involved in the development of cancer.
Alleles↗
Analysis and identification of imprinted genes.
Genomic imprinting in mammals results in the unequal expression of the two parental alleles of specific genes. The existence of imprinting in the mouse emerged from nuclear transplantation studies and from the abnormal phenotypes associated with uniparental inheritance of particular chromosome segments. Over the past 5 years, 20 or so imprinted genes have been identified. This has emphasized the important roles played by some imprinted genes in development, permitted a description of the epigenetic properties associated with imprinting, and provided the first insights into the regulation of imprinting. In this article, we discuss the generation of experimental material in which imprinting effects can be analyzed, review the properties of imprinted genes, and discuss how to examine them using state-of-the-art techniques. Finally, we consider the means by which new imprinted genes can be identified.
Alleles↗
A novel approach for identifying candidate imprinted genes through sequence analysis of imprinted and control genes.
Through the sequence analysis of 27 imprinted human genes and a set of 100 control genes we have developed a novel approach for identifying candidate imprinted genes based on the differences in sequence composition observed. The imprinted genes were found to be associated with significantly reduced numbers of short interspersed transposable element (SINE) Alus and mammalian-wide interspersed repeat (MIR) repeat elements, as previously reported. In addition, a significant association between imprinted genes and increased numbers of low-complexity repeats was also evident. Numbers of the Alu classes AluJ and AluS were found to be significantly depleted in some parts of the flanking regions of imprinted genes. A recent study has proposed that there is active selection against SINE elements in imprinted regions. Alternatively, there may be differences in the rates of insertion of Alu elements. Our study indicates that this difference extends both upstream and downstream of the coding region. This and other consistent differences between the sequence characteristics of imprinted and control genes has enabled us to develop discriminant analysis, which can be used to screen the genome for candidate imprinted genes. We have applied this function to a number of genes whose imprinting status is disputed or uncertain.
Female↗
On the oncodevelopmental role of human imprinted genes.
Genome imprinting has an essential role in normal embryonal mammalian development. Starting early in differentiation, the transcripts of certain human genes, e.g. the paternally-H19 and the maternally-imprinted IGF2, are expressed in specific tissues and organs during fetal life. In several malignant disorders, imprinted genes are, again, unfolded. Characteristically, expression follows the same tissue presentation as during embryogenesis. Clinical paternal disomies, i.e. trophoblastic diseases, and their maternal counterpart, i.e. ovarian teratomas, are associated with apparent relaxation of imprinting once they turn malignant. Paediatric neoplasms, like Wilm's tumor (WT) and rhabdomyosarcoma, often express IGF2 and H19. Recently, we have found H19 expression in invasive urothelial cancer. Evidently, imprinted genes display an oncodevelopmental mode of expression, very much like the classical oncofetal proteins AFP and CEA. Based on available data, including tumor preferential paternal allele retention and chromosome 11 short arm physical linkage with oncogenes like H-ras, we hypothesize that imprinted genes not only accompany cancer but may play a causative role as well.
Antigens, Neoplasm↗
A retrotransposon-derived gene, PEG10, is a novel imprinted gene located on human chromosome 7q21.
A novel paternally expressed imprinted gene, PEG10 (Paternally Expressed 10), was identified on human chromosome 7q21. PEG10 is located near the SGCE (Sarcoglycan epsilon) gene, whose mouse homologue was recently shown to be imprinted. Therefore, it is highly possible that a new imprinted gene cluster exists on human chromosome 7q21. Analysis of two predicted open reading frames (ORF1 and ORF2) revealed that ORF1 and ORF2 have homology to the gag and pol proteins of some vertebrate retrotransposons, respectively. These data suggest that PEG10 is derived from a retrotransposon that was previously integrated into the mammalian genome. PEG10 is likely to be essential for understanding how exogenous genes become imprinted.
Amino Acid Sequence↗
Identification and characterisation of imprinted genes in the mouse.
Imprinted genes are expressed specifically from one or other parental allele. Over 70 are now known, and about one-half of these are expressed from the paternal allele and one-half from the maternal allele. Most imprinted genes are clustered within imprinting regions of the mouse genome, regions which are associated with abnormal phenotypes when inherited uniparentally. Imprinted genes have been identified from surveys based on differential expression or differential methylation according to parental origin, as well as analyses of candidate genes, mutants and imprinted gene clusters. Many imprinted genes affect growth and development, and more than 25 per cent determine non-coding RNAs that may have a function in controlling imprinted gene expression.
Alleles↗
Expression patterns of the novel imprinted genes Nap1l5 and Peg13 and their non-imprinted host genes in the adult mouse brain.
Recent work has implicated imprinted gene functioning in neurodevelopment and behaviour and defining the expression patterns of these genes in brain tissue has become a key prerequisite to establishing function. In this work we report on the expression patterns of two novel imprinted loci, Nap1l5 and Peg13, in adult mouse brain using in situ hybridisation methods. Nap1l5 and Peg13 are located, respectively, within the introns of the non-imprinted genes Herc3 and the Tularik1 (T1)/KIAA1882 homologue in two separate microimprinted domains on mouse chromosomes 6 and 15. These 'host' genes are highly expressed in brain and consequently we were interested in assessing their expression patterns in parallel to the imprinted genes. The brain expression of all four genes appeared to be mainly neuronal. The detailed expression profiles of Nap1l5 and Peg13 were generally similar with widespread expression that was relatively high in the septal and hypothalamic regions, the hippocampus and the cerebral cortex. In contrast, there was some degree of dissociation between the imprinted genes and their non-imprinted hosts, in that, whilst there was again widespread expression of Herc3 and the T1/KIAA1882 homologue, these genes were also particularly highly expressed in Purkinje neurons and piriform cortex. We also examined expression of the novel imprinted genes in the adrenal glands. Nap1l5 expression was localised mainly to the adrenal medulla, whilst Peg13 expression was observed more generally throughout the adrenal medulla and the outer cortical layers.
Animals↗
Physiological functions of imprinted genes.
Genomic imprinting in gametogenesis marks a subset of mammalian genes for parent-of-origin-dependent monoallelic expression in the offspring. Embryological and classical genetic experiments in mice that uncovered the existence of genomic imprinting nearly two decades ago produced abnormalities of growth or behavior, without severe developmental malformations. Since then, the identification and manipulation of individual imprinted genes has continued to suggest that the diverse products of these genes are largely devoted to controlling pre- and post-natal growth, as well as brain function and behavior. Here, we review this evidence, and link our discussion to a website (http://www.otago.ac.nz/IGC) containing a comprehensive database of imprinted genes. Ultimately, these data will answer the long-debated question of whether there is a coherent biological rationale for imprinting.
Alleles↗