Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “finerenone”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

18 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2025

Estimated Long-Term Benefits of Finerenone in Heart Failure: A Prespecified Secondary Analysis of the FINEARTS-HF Randomized Clinical Trial.

IMPORTANCE: People living with heart failure (HF) with mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction have substantially curtailed life expectancy free from clinical events compared with their peers of comparable age. The nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist, finerenone, was recently shown to reduce risks of cardiovascular events in this population over a median follow-up of 2.6 years; as patients with HF typically continue treatment beyond this time frame, estimating the potential long-term benefits of finerenone could inform shared clinical decision-making. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the projected long-term treatment effects of finerenone in patients with HF with mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction if treated over a patient's lifetime. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Prespecified analyses were conducted of the FINEARTS-HF trial, a phase 3 randomized clinical trial conducted across 653 sites in 37 countries. Adults 40 years and older with symptomatic HF and left ventricular ejection fraction of 40% or greater were randomized from September 2020 to January 2023. Median (IQR) follow-up was 2.6 (1.9-3.0) years. INTERVENTIONS: Finerenone (titrated to either 20 mg or 40 mg) or placebo. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary composite outcome was time to cardiovascular death or worsening HF event. The long-term gains in survival free from a primary end point with finerenone were iteratively estimated with age-based Kaplan-Meier curves using age at randomization rather than time from randomization. Differences in areas under the survival curves between the finerenone and placebo arms represented event-free survival gains. RESULTS: Among 6001 participants (median [IQR] age, 73 [66-79] years; 3269 male [54.5%]), mean survival free from the primary end point for a 55-year-old participant was 13.6 years (95% CI, 11.9-15.2 years) with finerenone and 10.5 years (95% CI, 6.8-11.3 years) with placebo, representing a gain in event-free survival of 3.1 years (95% CI, 0.8-5.4 years; P = .007). Mean event-free survival for a 65-year-old participant was 11.0 years (95% CI, 10.1-11.9 years) with finerenone and 8.9 years (95% CI, 8.1-9.8 years) with placebo, representing a gain of 2.0 years (95% CI, 0.8-3.3 years; P = .001). Projected mean event-free survival was numerically greater with finerenone than with placebo for every starting age between 50 to 80 years. Lifetime gains in event-free survival were observed even among individuals already treated with a sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor (65-year-old participant: 3.1 years; 95% CI, 0.1-6.0 years; P = .04). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this prespecified secondary analysis of the FINEARTS-HF randomized clinical trial, long-term treatment with finerenone was estimated to extend event-free survival by up to 3 years among people with HF with mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04435626.

Humans↗
PubMed2025

Finerenone and Cardiovascular Outcomes According to Baseline Kidney Function in Patients With Heart Failure: The FINEARTS-HF Trial.

BACKGROUND: Finerenone is known to reduce the risk of worsening heart failure (HF) events and cardiovascular (CV) death in patients with HF with mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction. OBJECTIVES: The authors explored whether the benefit of finerenone among patients with HF with mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction differs according to baseline measures of kidney function. METHODS: FINEARTS-HF (Finerenone Trial to Investigate Efficacy and Safety Superior to Placebo in Patients With Heart Failure) was a global, randomized clinical trial of finerenone vs placebo among patients with HF with mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction. Finerenone was titrated to 20 mg/d if the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was &#x2264;60 mL/min/1.73 m2 or 40 mg/d if eGFR was >60 mL/min/1.73 m2. The authors used a semiparametric proportional rates method, stratified by left ventricular ejection fraction (<60%; &#x2265;60%) and region, to assess for differential treatment effects on the composite of total HF events and CV death according to the baseline eGFR (continuous and categories [&#x2265;60 mL/min/1.73 m2, 45 to <60 mL/min/1.73 m2, <45 mL/min/1.73 m2] and urine albumin-creatinine ratio (UACR) (<30 mg/g, 30 to <300 mg/g, &#x2265;300 mg/g). RESULTS: The effect of finerenone to reduce the primary endpoint of total HF events and CV death did not significantly differ according to baseline eGFR (Pinteraction = 0.14 and 0.07 for continuous and categorical eGFR, respectively) with rate ratio 0.72 (95% CI: 0.59-0.88) for eGFR &#x2265;60 mL/min/1.73 m2, 0.83 (95% CI: 0.65-1.06) for eGFR 45 to <60 mL/min/1.73 m2, and 1.02 (95% CI: 0.83-1.26) for eGFR <45 mL/min/1.73 m2. The corresponding absolute event rates were 9.2 vs 12.5, 16.5 vs 19.9, and 28.0 vs 28.0 per 100 patient-years for finerenone vs placebo, respectively. Similar results were noted for total worsening HF events. Finerenone lowered the risk of the composite CV outcome similarly across baseline categories of UACR (Pinteraction = 0.48). CONCLUSIONS: In the FINEARTS-HF trial (where the target dose of finerenone was determined by baseline kidney function), the effect of finerenone to reduce the composite of cardiovascular death and total HF events did not significantly differ across a range of baseline eGFR and UACR.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Efficacy and Safety of the Kidney Function-Based Finerenone Dosing Strategy Used in FINEARTS-HF.

BACKGROUND: Given that mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists have the potential to impair renal function and induce hyperkalemia, close monitoring of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and serum potassium levels is essential to ensure the safe administration of this therapy. OBJECTIVES: In this prespecified analysis, the authors evaluated the efficacy and safety of the kidney function-based finerenone dosing strategy used in the FINEARTS-HF trial. METHODS: In FINEARTS-HF, patients with an eGFR of 25 to 60&#x2009;mL/min/1.73&#x2009;m2 at baseline were stratified at randomization to the low-dose group and started on 10&#x2009;mg of finerenone once daily (titrated to a maximum 20&#x2009;mg/d) or matching placebo, whereas those with an eGFR >60&#x2009;mL/min/1.73&#x2009;m2 at baseline were stratified to the high-dose group and started on 20&#x2009;mg of finerenone once daily (titrated to a maximum 40&#x2009;mg/d) or matching placebo. The primary outcome was the composite of total (first and recurrent) heart failure events and cardiovascular death. RESULTS: Among 5,986 (99.8%) analyzable patients, 3,159 were assigned to the higher eGFR/high-dose stratum and 2,827 to the lower eGFR/low-dose stratum group. The mean &#xb1; SD achieved dose was 32.3&#x2009;&#xb1;&#x2009;9.1&#x2009;mg (finerenone) and 34.4&#x2009;&#xb1;&#x2009;7.8&#x2009;mg (placebo) in the higher eGFR/high-dose stratum, and 15.6&#x2009;&#xb1;&#x2009;4.3&#x2009;mg (finerenone) and 16.7&#x2009;&#xb1;&#x2009;4.0 mg (placebo) in the lower eGFR/low-dose stratum. The effect of finerenone on the primary outcome was consistent across the 2 dosing strata (higher eGFR/high-dose stratum: rate ratio: 0.77 [95% CI: 0.63-0.94] vs lower eGFR/low-dose stratum: rate ratio: 0.87 [95% CI: 0.74-1.03]; P for interaction = 0.34). Consistent benefits were observed for the components of the primary outcome and all-cause death. Safety was also consistent between dosing strata, except for hypokalemia, where the reduction in the odds of hypokalemia with finerenone compared to placebo was greater in the higher eGFR/high-dose stratum (P-interaction < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: In FINEARTS-HF, an eGFR-based dosing strategy allowed effective and safe use of finerenone in patients with heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction/ heart failure with preserved ejection fraction with a baseline eGFR as low as 25&#x2009;mL/min/1.73&#x2009;m2. We recommend that clinicians implement the trial-validated dosing strategy and incorporate appropriate uptitration to the target dose to ensure optimal therapeutic outcomes. (FINEARTS-HF [Study to Evaluate the Efficacy (Effect on Disease) and Safety of Finerenone in Participants With Heart Failure and Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (Proportion of Blood Expelled Per Heart Stroke) Greater or Equal to 40%; NCT04435626).

Aged↗
PubMed2025

Finerenone According to Frailty in Heart Failure: A Prespecified Analysis of the FINEARTS-HF Randomized Clinical Trial.

IMPORTANCE: Patients with frailty are often perceived to have a less favorable benefit-risk profile for novel therapies and therefore may be less likely to receive these. OBJECTIVE: To examine the efficacy and safety of finerenone, compared with placebo, according to frailty status in patients with heart failure (HF) and mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF) or with HF and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This was a prespecified secondary analysis of a phase 3 randomized clinical trial, the Finerenone Trial to Investigate Efficacy and Safety Superior to Placebo in Patients With Heart Failure (FINEARTS-HF), conducted across 653 sites in 37 countries. Patients with HF with New York Heart Association functional class II through IV, a left ventricular ejection fraction of 40% or higher, evidence of structural heart disease, and elevated natriuretic peptide levels were randomized between September 2020 and January 2023. Data analysis was conducted from October 1 to November 30, 2024. INTERVENTION: Addition of once-daily finerenone or placebo to usual therapy. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome was a composite of cardiovascular death and total worsening HF events. Frailty was measured using the Rockwood cumulative deficit approach. RESULTS: Of the 6001 patients randomized in FINEARTS-HF, a frailty index (FI) was calculable in 5952 patients (mean [SD] age, 72.0 [9.6] years; 3241 [54.4%] male). In total, 1588 patients (26.7%) had class I frailty (FI &#x2264;0.210 [not frail]), 2141 (36.0%) had class II frailty (FI 0.211-0.310 [more frail]), and 2223 (37.3%) had class III frailty (FI &#x2265;0.311 [most frail]). Compared with patients with class I frailty, those with class II and III frailty had a higher risk of the primary outcome (unadjusted rate ratio [RR], 1.88 [95% CI, 1.54-2.28] for class II and 3.86 [95% CI, 3.22-4.64] for class III). The effect of finerenone on the primary outcome did not vary significantly by frailty class (class I: RR, 1.07 [95% CI, 0.77-1.49]; class II: RR, 0.66 [95% CI, 0.52-0.83]; class III: RR, 0.91 [95% CI, 0.76-1.07]; P for interaction&#x2009;=&#x2009;.77). Frailty class did not modify the effects of finerenone on the components of the primary outcome, all-cause death, or improvement in the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire total symptom score. The effects of finerenone, compared with placebo, on experiencing hypotension, elevated creatinine level, hyperkalemia, or hypokalemia did not differ by frailty class. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In FINEARTS-HF, finerenone reduced the risk of total worsening HF events and cardiovascular death, and it improved symptoms; these effects were not modified by frailty status. In addition, the effects of finerenone on experiencing hypotension, elevated creatinine level, hyperkalemia, or hypokalemia did not differ by frailty status. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04435626.

Humans↗
PubMed2025

Finerenone-Related Risk of Hypotension in Heart Failure With Mildly Reduced or Preserved Ejection Fraction.

BACKGROUND: The nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist finerenone reduces clinical events in heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction/preserved ejection fraction; however, the implications of treatment-related hypotension are unknown. OBJECTIVES: The authors investigated predictors of systolic blood pressure (SBP) <100 mm Hg and investigator-reported hypotension and their associations with randomized treatment and clinical outcomes in the FINEARTS-HF (Study to Evaluate the Efficacy [Effect on Disease] and Safety of Finerenone in Participants With Heart Failure and Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction [Proportion of Blood Expelled Per Heart Stroke]) trial. METHODS: FINEARTS-HF was a randomized, placebo-controlled trial of finerenone in symptomatic patients with chronic heart failure (left ventricular ejection fraction &#x2265;40%). Predictors of SBP <100 mm Hg and hypotension were identified using Cox models. Associations between SBP <100 mm Hg and hypotension, treatment, and clinical outcomes were evaluated using time-updated Cox models. The primary outcome was a composite of total heart failure events and cardiovascular death. RESULTS: Among the 5,815 participants with available data, post-baseline SBP <100 mm Hg occurred in 899 (538 with finerenone vs 361 with placebo; odds ratio: 1.60; 95% CI: 1.38-1.85) and investigator-reported hypotension in 364 patients (225 with finerenone vs 139 with placebo; odds ratio: 1.67; 95% CI: 1.34-2.08). Participants experiencing SBP <100 mm Hg had lower baseline SBP, were older, had higher N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide levels, a history of smoking, and no diabetes. Treatment-related risk of the primary endpoint was reduced in patients with no/before SBP <100 mm Hg (rate ratio: 0.78; 95% CI: 0.67-0.90) and appeared to attenuate afterwards (rate ratio: 0.99; 95% CI: 0.70-1.39), although no formal statistical interaction was observed (Pinteraction = 0.33). CONCLUSIONS: In this prespecified analysis of the FINEARTS-HF trial, finerenone led to higher rates of post-baseline SBP <100 mm Hg and investigator-reported hypotension. Although hypotension should not prompt automatic treatment discontinuation, these patients should be carefully monitored. (Study to Evaluate the Efficacy (Effect on Disease) and Safety of Finerenone in Participants With Heart Failure and Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (Proportion of Blood Expelled Per Heart Stroke) Greater or Equal to 40% [FINEARTS-HF]; NCT04435626).

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Finerenone and quality of life in heart failure: component-level analyses and clinical relevance of the Kansas City cardiomyopathy questionnaire.

AIMS: Finerenone was shown to improve overall health status, as measured by the aggregate 23-item Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) score, in heart failure with mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction (HFmrEF/HFpEF). This study aimed to contextualize KCCQ changes in a manner that is relevant to patients and clinicians, thereby improving understanding of this metric in HFmrEF/HFpEF. METHODS AND RESULTS: In this prespecified analysis of FINEARTS-HF, a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of finerenone in HFmrEF/HFpEF, we performed exploratory assessments of treatment effects on mean score changes from baseline to 12 months for each of the 23 KCCQ components (scaled from 0 [worst] to 100 [best]) using multivariable linear regression. We further compared the impact of finerenone on the KCCQ-overall summary score (KCCQ-OSS) at 12 months with the expected decline per year. Of 6001 participants in FINEARTS-HF, 5006 completed the KCCQ both at baseline and 12 months (age: 72 &#xb1; 10 years, women: 45%, baseline KCCQ-OSS: 63.9 &#xb1; 22.0). Finerenone, compared with placebo, numerically improved all but one KCCQ component, with the greatest nominal improvement observed in lower limb oedema frequency (+2.5, 95% CI: 0.9-4.1), fatigue burden (+2.2, 95% CI: 0.9-3.5), fatigue frequency (+2.1, 95% CI: 0.7-3.6), and lower limb oedema burden (+1.8, 95% CI: 0.6-2.9). KCCQ-OSS at 12 months was inversely related to age, with finerenone shifting the age-KCCQ-OSS relationship by 4.7 (95% CI: 0.4-9.1) years. CONCLUSIONS: In FINEARTS-HF, finerenone was associated with modest improvements in health status-most notably lower limb oedema and fatigue-in patients with HFmrEF/HFpEF.

Humans↗
PubMed2025

Finerenone for Heart Failure and Risk Estimated by the PREDICT-HFpEF Model: A Secondary Analysis of FINEARTS-HF.

IMPORTANCE: Patients with heart failure (HF) and mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF) or preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) have a spectrum of risk, and the effect of therapies may vary by risk. OBJECTIVES: To validate the Prognostic Models for Mortality and Morbidity in HFpEF (PREDICT-HFpEF) in the phase 3 randomized clinical trial Finerenone Trial to Investigate Efficacy and Safety Superior to Placebo in Patients With Heart Failure (FINEARTS-HF) and to evaluate the effect of finerenone, compared with placebo, across the spectrum of risk in these patients. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The FINEARTS-HF trial was conducted across 653 sites in 37 countries. Participants were adults 40 years and older with symptomatic HF and left ventricular EF of 40% or greater randomized between September 2020 and January 2023. INTERVENTION: Finerenone (titrated to 20 mg or 40 mg) or placebo. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The 3 PREDICT-HFpEF risk scores for the composite outcome of cardiovascular death or HF hospitalization, cardiovascular death, and all-cause death, respectively, were calculated. Predicted risk was compared with observed outcomes. Model performance was assessed using the Harrell C statistic. The rates of the predicted outcomes (plus the composite of cardiovascular death and worsening HF events, which was the primary end point in the trial) were examined according to quintiles of risk score, as was the effect of finerenone according to risk quintiles. RESULTS: A total of 6001 patients (mean [SD] age, 72 [9.6] years; 3269 male [54.5%]) were randomized in the FINEARTS-HF trial. The C statistics for cardiovascular death or HF hospitalization, cardiovascular death, and all-cause death at 2 years were 0.71 (95% CI, 0.69-0.72), 0.68 (95% CI, 0.66-0.71), and 0.69 (95% CI, 0.67-0.71), respectively. The risk of the composite outcomes was approximately 8- to 10-fold higher in those in the highest compared with the lowest risk quintile. The relative risk reduction with finerenone compared with placebo was consistent across the spectrum of risk for all outcomes examined (eg, interaction P value for primary outcome&#x2009;=&#x2009;.24). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Results of the FINEARTS-HF randomized clinical trial demonstrate that the PREDICT-HFpEF models performed well in terms of calibration and discrimination. Baseline risk did not modify the benefit of finerenone. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04435626.

Aged↗
PubMed2025

Finerenone and Atrial Fibrillation in Heart Failure: A Secondary Analysis of the FINEARTS-HF Randomized Clinical Trial.

IMPORTANCE: Heart failure (HF) with mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction and atrial fibrillation (AF) are closely intertwined. OBJECTIVE: To examine the efficacy and safety of the nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist finerenone in patients with HF with mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction according to the absence or presence of AF and the type of AF (paroxysmal vs persistent or permanent). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Prespecified analyses were conducted in the Finerenone Trial to Investigate Efficacy and Safety Superior to Placebo in Patients With Heart Failure (FINEARTS-HF) randomized clinical trial. The trial was conducted across 653 sites in 37 countries. Participants were adults aged 40 years and older with symptomatic HF and left ventricular ejection fraction of 40% or greater, randomized between September 2020 and January 2023. Data analysis was conducted from September 1 to October 1, 2024. INTERVENTION: Finerenone (titrated to 20 mg or 40 mg) or placebo. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome was the composite of total HF events and cardiovascular death. New-onset AF or atrial flutter (AFL) was a prespecified exploratory outcome. RESULTS: Among 5984 patients (mean [SD] age, 72.0 [9.6] years; 2724 [45.5%] female) with known AF status at baseline, 1384 (23.1%) had paroxysmal AF and 1886 (31.5%) had persistent or permanent AF. Patients with both types of AF were older and had worse HF status compared with those without AF (2714 patients [45.4%]). Both types of AF were associated with a higher unadjusted risk of the primary outcome compared with no AF (event rate per 100 person-years of follow-up, 20.3 [95% CI, 17.9-23.1] with paroxysmal AF, 19.8 [95% CI, 17.8-22.0] with persistent or permanent AF, and 11.9 [95% CI, 10.7-13.3] with no AF; rate ratio [RR], 1.62 [95% CI, 1.37-1.92] with paroxysmal AF and 1.66 [95% CI, 1.43-1.93] with persistent or permanent AF vs no AF); however, the associations were attenuated after adjustment for known prognostic variables. The benefit of finerenone on the primary outcome (overall RR, 0.84 [95% CI, 0.74-0.95]) was not modified by baseline AF status (RR, 0.80 [95% CI, 0.65-0.98] with no AF, 0.83 [95% CI, 0.65-1.06] with paroxysmal AF, and 0.85 [95% CI, 0.69-1.05] with persistent or permanent AF; P for interaction&#x2009;=&#x2009;.94). New-onset AF or AFL occurred in 6.5% of patients and was associated with a higher subsequent adjusted risk of the primary outcome (rate ratio, 3.65 [95% CI, 2.57-5.18]; P&#x2009;<&#x2009;.001). The subdistribution hazard ratio for new-onset AF or AFL among those receiving finerenone vs placebo was 0.77 (95% CI, 0.57-1.04; P&#x2009;=&#x2009;.09). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The efficacy of finerenone was consistent regardless of AF status. New-onset AF was associated with a substantially higher risk of subsequent outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04435626.

Humans↗
PubMed2025

Finerenone in Heart Failure With Improved Ejection Fraction: The FINEARTS-HF Randomized Clinical Trial.

IMPORTANCE: Patients with chronic heart failure (HF) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) less than 40% who experience LVEF improvement to 40% or higher (HFimpEF) may still face residual risks. OBJECTIVE: To assess the clinical profiles, risk, and treatment response to finerenone in participants with HFimpEF. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A total of 6001 patients with HE, LVEF of 40% or higher, New York Heart Association class II to IV symptoms, and elevated natriuretic peptide levels, were enrolled between September 14, 2020, and January 10, 2023. Patients with a prior history of LVEF less than 40% were included. Data analysis was conducted between September 1 to December 10, 2024. INTERVENTION: Participants received finerenone (titrated to 20 mg or 40 mg) or placebo. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary end point was the composite of cardiovascular (CV) death and total (first and recurrent) worsening HF events. RESULTS: Of the 6001 participants (mean [SD] age, 72 [9.7], years; 3269 male [55%]), 273 (5%) had a prior LVEF less than 40%. Among those with a prior LVEF of less than 40%, the median recorded prior LVEF was 35% [IQR, 30%-37%], with a median improvement of 12% [IQR, 8%-17%]. Over a median follow-up of 2.6 years, those with a history of LVEF of less than 40% experienced higher rates of the primary outcome of a composite of CV death and worsening of HF events (21.4 per 100 patient-years vs 16.0 per 100 patient-years) than did those whose LVEF was consistently 40% or higher. After adjustment for clinically relevant covariates; however, this rate ratio (RR) was not statistically different (absolute RR, 1.13; 95% CI, 0.85-1.49, P&#x2009;=&#x2009;.39). The treatment effect of finerenone on the primary outcome was consistent among those with a history of LVEF less than 40% and those with LVEF that was consistently 40% or higher (P for interaction&#x2009;=&#x2009;.36). Owing to higher baseline risk, the absolute risk reduction was greater among those with HFimpEF (9.2 vs 2.5 per 100 patient-years). Patients with HFimpEF tended to develop more hypotension with finerenone treatment, but otherwise, the safety profile of finerenone was similar in patients with and without previous LVEF less than 40%. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this prespecified analysis of a randomized clinical trial, patients with HFimpEF remained at high risk of CV events, underscoring the need for continued management despite LVEF improvement. The treatment benefits of finerenone observed among the overall population of patients with HF with preserved EF were consistent among patients with HFimpEF. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04435626.

Humans↗
PubMed2025

Mode of Death in Patients With Heart Failure With Mildly Reduced or Preserved Ejection Fraction: The FINEARTS-HF Randomized Clinical Trial.

IMPORTANCE: The mode of death in patients with heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF) or heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) remains poorly understood and may vary by EF. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the mode of death according to EF and the treatment effect of finerenone on cause-specific mortality in patients with HFmrEF/HFpEF. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This was a prespecified secondary analysis of the Finerenone Trial to Investigate Efficacy and Safety Superior to Placebo in Patients With Heart Failure (FINEARTS-HF) randomized clinical trial, which evaluated clinical outcomes in 6001 patients with HF and EF greater than or equal to 40% randomly assigned to finerenone or placebo. The mode of death in relation to baseline EF categories (<50%, &#x2265;50-<60%, and &#x2265;60%) was examined, and the effect of randomized treatment on cause-specific death in Cox regression models was assessed. Data analysis was conducted between September 2024 and January 2025. INTERVENTIONS: Finerenone vs placebo. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Mode of death as centrally adjudicated by a clinical end points committee. RESULTS: Of 1013 patients (16.9%; median [IQR] age, 76 [69-82] years; 594 male [58.6%]) who died during median (IQR) follow-up of 32 (23-36) months, mode of death was ascribed to cardiovascular causes in 502 (49.6%), noncardiovascular causes in 368 (36.3%), and undetermined cause in 143 (14.1%). Of cardiovascular deaths, 215 (42.8%) were due to sudden death, 163 (32.4%) to HF, 48 (9.6%) to stroke, 25 (5.0%) to myocardial infarction, and 51 (10.2%) to other cardiovascular causes. The proportion of all-cause, cardiovascular, and sudden death was higher in those with EF less than 50%. The proportion of deaths related to HF was similar across EF categories, and the proportion of deaths due to myocardial infarction, stroke, and other cardiovascular causes was low regardless of EF. Randomization to finerenone did not significantly reduce death or cause-specific death compared with placebo in any EF category. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Among patients with HFmrEF/HFpEF in the FINEARTS-HF randomized clinical trial, higher proportions of cardiovascular and overall mortality in those with EF less than 50% were related principally to higher proportions of sudden death. A clear treatment effect of finerenone on cardiovascular or cause-specific mortality was not identified, although the trial was likely underpowered for these outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04435626.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

EMPEROR-Preserved Risk Model and Outcomes in the FINEARTS-HF Trial: A Prespecified Secondary Analysis of FINEARTS-HF.

IMPORTANCE: Patients with heart failure (HF) and mildly reduced ejection fraction (HFmrEF) or preserved EF (HFpEF) show substantial heterogeneity in prognosis. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the performance of biomarker-driven prognostic models derived from the Empagliflozin Outcome Trial in Patients With Chronic Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction (EMPEROR-Preserved) Trial in the Finerenone Trial to Investigate Efficacy and Safety Superior to Placebo in Patients With Heart Failure (FINEARTS-HF) and to examine whether baseline risk modified the therapeutic effect of finerenone. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This is a prespecified secondary analysis of the FINEARTS-HF trial, which was conducted across 653 sites in 37 countries among adults aged 40 years and older with symptomatic HF and left ventricular EF (LVEF) of 40% or greater. Patients were randomized between September 2020 and January 2023, and data analysis for this study was conducted from September to October 2025. The median (IQR) follow-up period was 32 (23-37) months. INTERVENTION: Finerenone (titrated to 20 mg or 40 mg) or placebo. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: EMPEROR-Preserved risk scores for the outcomes of first HF hospitalization or cardiovascular death, cardiovascular death, and all-cause death were calculated in FINEARTS-HF using models incorporating N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide, high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T, New York Heart Association functional class, history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and diabetes, insulin use, and-depending on outcome-age, hemoglobin and albumin levels, HF duration, time from prior HF hospitalization, and sodium-glucose transporter 2 inhibitor use. Estimated risks were compared with observed event rates, and model performance was assessed using Harrell C statistic. Treatment effects were evaluated across risk quintiles (Q1 to Q5) and across the continuous risk distribution. RESULTS: Among 6001 patients (mean [SD] age, 72.0 [9.6] years; 2732 [45.5%] women; 3003 randomized to finerenone and 2998 randomized to placebo), the EMPEROR-Preserved risk model estimated risk of outcomes, with Q5 vs Q1 hazard ratios (HRs) of 10.49 (95% CI, 8.14-13.52) for the composite of HF hospitalization or cardiovascular death and 13.47 (95% CI, 8.79-20.64) for cardiovascular death. The model demonstrated good discrimination. The treatment effect of finerenone was consistent across risk quintiles for first HF hospitalization or cardiovascular death (Q1: HR, 0.93 [95% CI, 0.58-1.49]; Q2: HR, 1.04 [95% CI, 0.76-1.43]; Q3: HR, 0.82 [95% CI, 0.62-1.07]; Q4: HR, 0.81 [95% CI, 0.65-1.01]; and Q5: HR, 0.88 [95% CI, 0.74-1.05]; P for interaction&#x2009;=&#x2009;.68) and remained uniform across the continuous risk spectrum. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The EMPEROR-Preserved risk models demonstrated good performance in FINEARTS-HF. Baseline risk did not modify the relative treatment effect of finerenone. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04435626.

Humans↗
PubMed2023

Estimated Lifetime Cardiovascular, Kidney, and Mortality Benefits of Combination Treatment With SGLT2 Inhibitors, GLP-1 Receptor Agonists, and Nonsteroidal MRA Compared With Conventional Care in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and Albuminuria.

BACKGROUND: Sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i), glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RA), and the nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (ns-MRA) finerenone all individually reduce cardiovascular, kidney, and mortality outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes and albuminuria. However, the lifetime benefits of combination therapy with these medicines are not known. METHODS: We used data from 2 SGLT2i trials (CANVAS [Canagliflozin Cardiovascular Assessment] and CREDENCE [Canagliflozin and Renal Events in Diabetes with Established Nephropathy Clinical Evaluation]), 2 ns-MRA trials (FIDELIO-DKD [Finerenone in Reducing Kidney Failure and Disease Progression in Diabetic Kidney Disease] and FIGARO-DKD [Efficacy and Safety of Finerenone in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and the Clinical Diagnosis of Diabetic Kidney Disease]), and 8 GLP-1 RA trials to estimate the relative effects of combination therapy versus conventional care (renin-angiotensin system blockade and traditional risk factor control) on cardiovascular, kidney, and mortality outcomes. Using actuarial methods, we then estimated absolute risk reductions with combination SGLT2i, GLP-1 RA, and ns-MRA in patients with type 2 diabetes and at least moderately increased albuminuria (urinary albumin:creatinine ratio &#x2265;30 mg/g) by applying estimated combination treatment effects to participants receiving conventional care in CANVAS and CREDENCE. RESULTS: Compared with conventional care, the combination of SGLT2i, GLP-1 RA, and ns-MRA was associated with a hazard ratio of 0.65 (95% CI, 0.55-0.76) for major adverse cardiovascular events (nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke, or cardiovascular death). The corresponding estimated absolute risk reduction over 3 years was 4.4% (95% CI, 3.0-5.7), with a number needed to treat of 23 (95% CI, 18-33). For a 50-year-old patient commencing combination therapy, estimated major adverse cardiovascular event-free survival was 21.1 years compared with 17.9 years for conventional care (3.2 years gained [95% CI, 2.1-4.3]). There were also projected gains in survival free from hospitalized heart failure (3.2 years [95% CI, 2.4-4.0]), chronic kidney disease progression (5.5 years [95% CI, 4.0-6.7]), cardiovascular death (2.2 years [95% CI, 1.2-3.0]), and all-cause death (2.4 years [95% CI, 1.4-3.4]). Attenuated but clinically relevant gains in event-free survival were observed in analyses assuming 50% additive effects of combination therapy, including for major adverse cardiovascular events (2.4 years [95% CI, 1.1-3.5]), chronic kidney disease progression (4.5 years [95% CI, 2.8-5.9]), and all-cause death (1.8 years [95% CI, 0.7-2.8]). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with type 2 diabetes and at least moderately increased albuminuria, combination treatment of SGLT2i, GLP-1 RA, and ns-MRA has the potential to afford relevant gains in cardiovascular and kidney event-free and overall survival.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

GPER and EGFR cross-talk highlight aldosterone- and MR antagonist-induced NO production in cultured endothelial cells.

INTRODUCTION: Aldosterone induces rapid, non-genomic vasodilation of the rat mesenteric vasculature, and mineralocorticoid receptor (MR) antagonists are widely used in cardiovascular disease, yet their pharmacological profiles beyond classical MR blockade remain unclear. We examined whether the G protein-coupled estrogen receptor (GPER/GPR30), functionally coupled to the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), accounts for the rapid endothelial nitric oxide (NO) component of aldosterone action, and whether MR antagonists display intrinsic GPER-linked activity. METHODS: Aldosterone-induced vasodilation was assessed in isolated perfused rat mesenteric arterial beds precontracted with noradrenaline, and NO production was quantified in primary mesenteric endothelial cell cultures by DAF-FM fluorescence with validated vehicle controls. The mechanisms engaged by spironolactone, eplerenone and finerenone were interrogated with selective pharmacological tools and by endothelium removal. Ligand recognition was explored by molecular docking in a comparative model of the rat GPER built on the human GPER cryo-EM template. RESULTS: Aldosterone elicited concentration-dependent endothelial NO production (EC50 = 2.26 &#xb1; 0.3 nM) and vasodilation (EC50 = 0.9 &#xb1; 0.2 nM) that were closely correlated (R2 = 0.969, p < 0.01). All three MR antagonists blocked the aldosterone responses, yet each also evoked intrinsic, concentration-dependent NO production in the absence of aldosterone, eplerenone and spironolactone showing greater intrinsic efficacy than finerenone. Pretreatment with 100 nM of the GPER antagonist G-36 or 100 nM AG-1478 significantly reduced both aldosterone-induced DAF-NO signaling and vasodilation, whereas endothelium removal or L-NAME converted vasodilation into vasoconstriction. Aldosterone signaling additionally required PI3K, PKA and IP3 receptor-gated Ca2+ mobilization. Docking identified plausible receptor-engaging poses, with steroidal ligands converging on a shared cavity and finerenone adopting a distinct binding mode. DISCUSSION: MR antagonists elicit endothelial NO production through a G-36-sensitive, GPER-linked pathway functionally coupled to EGFR signaling, rather than acting as pure competitive antagonists in this context. Because recent cryo-EM work reveals a non-canonical extracellular GPER architecture, the docking results are interpreted as structurally plausible interaction scenarios rather than definitive orthosteric assignments; whether the behaviour reflects direct partial agonism at GPER or an indirect, GPER-dependent mechanism remains to be established by direct-binding studies. These findings expand current understanding of MR antagonist pharmacology.

GPER/GPR30↗
PubMed2026

From pathobiology to prescribing in obesity-driven HFpEF: A systematic review and practical therapeutic framework.

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is increasingly driven by obesity and cardiometabolic dysfunction. In this phenotype, the dominant biology extends beyond congestion alone and includes visceral and epicardial adiposity, systemic inflammation, impaired myocardial energetics, endothelial dysfunction, and exertional elevation in filling pressures. We performed a PRISMA-compliant systematic review with structured narrative evidence synthesis to evaluate pharmacological therapy in obesity-driven HFpEF, searching PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science Core Collection, ClinicalTrials.gov, and WHO ICTRP through December 2025. Eighteen reports were included in the final qualitative synthesis. The available evidence supports sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors as the pharmacological foundation because they provide the most mature outcome data across the preserved ejection fraction spectrum. Semaglutide improves symptoms, physical limitations, exercise capacity, and body weight in dedicated obesity-related HFpEF trials, whereas tirzepatide extends this signal by improving clinical status and reducing worsening heart failure events. Finerenone broadens the therapeutic platform in HF with mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction, although obesity-specific data remain indirect. Conventional neurohormonal therapies retain a selective role, but they are not the principal biological match for this phenotype. Obesity-driven HFpEF should therefore be managed as a cardiometabolic syndrome with heart failure expression, using a phenotype-based sequence that links diagnosis, decongestion, SGLT2 inhibition, obesity-directed therapy, and selective adjunctive intensification.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Large-scale AI analysis reveals missed opportunities in albuminuria testing and disease-modifying therapy implementation.

AIMS: Albuminuria is a key diagnostic and prognostic biomarker of chronic kidney disease (CKD), associated with adverse cardiovascular and renal outcomes. Despite guideline recommendations, urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR) testing is infrequently performed in cardiology. This study assessed the uptake of UACR testing, the estimated prevalence of undiagnosed albuminuria, and the use of disease-modifying therapies in patients with cardio-kidney-metabolic (CKM) disease. METHODS AND RESULTS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of all adults seen at the cardiology department of a tertiary referral centre between 2019 and 2024. Data were extracted using CTcue, an AI-driven platform. Albuminuria was defined as UACR &#x2265;30 mg/g. A weighted logistic regression model estimated albuminuria prevalence in untested patients. Among 77 351 patients (44.8% female, mean age 64.4 years), only 8.9% had a recorded UACR, of whom 46.4% had albuminuria. Testing rates were low across high-risk groups: 29.9% in diabetes, 21.7% in heart failure, and 13.7% in hypertension. In untested patients, the predicted prevalence of albuminuria was 36.6%, and highest in those with eGFR <30 mL/min/1.73m2 (70.0%), heart failure (47.8%), or diabetes (46.8%). Use of disease-modifying therapies was low, even among patients with confirmed albuminuria. In patients with documented vs. predicted albuminuria, 43.0% vs. 39.1% received renin-angiotensin system inhibitors, 12.8% vs. 5.7% received SGLT2 inhibitors, and <1% in both groups received finerenone. CONCLUSION: Albuminuria is substantially underdetected in cardiology practice, possibly contributing to underuse of effective CKM therapies. Systematic UACR screening with structured treatment protocols may help close this gap and improve outcomes for patients with CKM disease.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

New Evidence in Heart Failure: 2026 Update.

Heart failure (HF) remains a major cause of morbidity, mortality, impaired quality of life and healthcare expenditure worldwide. The global burden of HF continues to increase due to population aging, improved survival, and the growing prevalence of cardiovascular, renal, and metabolic comorbidities. Simultaneously, the pace of scientific progress in HF has accelerated considerably. Recent advances have refined our understanding of HF epidemiology, prognosis, and disease trajectories, including emerging concepts of HF improvement, remission, and recovery. The Second Universal Definition of HF has also updated the classification framework, moving beyond the traditional ejection fraction-based categories. HF is now broadly classified into two major phenotypes: heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Novel mechanistic insights highlight the role of inflammation, immune activation, metabolic dysfunction, mitochondrial biology, and multisystem interactions in HF progression. There has also been significant progress in the characterization and management of major comorbidities, including chronic kidney disease (CKD), diabetes, obesity, atrial fibrillation (AF), pulmonary hypertension, frailty, malnutrition, and cancer. Diagnostic innovations include novel biomarkers, multi-omics technologies, artificial intelligence-based approaches, advanced imaging techniques, congestion assessment tools, and emerging digital health solutions. Important advances have occurred in specific HF aetiologies, including cardiomyopathies, cardiac amyloidosis (CA), myocarditis, arrhythmia-induced cardiomyopathy (AiCM), and Chagas cardiomyopathy. Therapeutic developments continue to reshape HF management across the spectrum of left ventricular ejection fraction. Recent evidence has focused on optimization of guideline-directed medical therapy in HFrEF, expansion of evidence-based therapies in HFpEF, and growing roles for sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors, finerenone, incretin-based therapies, and transcatheter valve interventions. Collectively, these advances support the transition from a predominantly phenotype-based approach towards a more personalized and biologically informed model of HF care, with the potential to further improve outcomes across the entire HF spectrum.

Journal Article↗