Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “fibrin glue”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

6 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2025

Autologous Fibrin Glue in Pterygium Surgery as an Alternative to Commercial Fibrin Glue.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of autologous fibrin glue in pterygium surgery, comparing it with commercial fibrin glue in terms of postoperative complications, graft stability, and recurrence rate. METHODS: A prospective, randomized, double-blind study was conducted, involving 42 patients with primary pterygium who underwent autologous conjunctival-limbal transplantation. The graft was fixed using autologous fibrin glue (Group 1, G1) or commercial fibrin glue (Group 2, G2). All patients underwent surgery performed by the same surgeon and were reevaluated on postoperative days 7, 30, 90, and 180 by an independent observer, assessing clinical parameters in the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative periods. RESULTS: No cases of severe adverse events were reported. Complete graft dehiscence occurred in 1 patient from G1. The G2 group had more cases of subconjunctival hemorrhage ( P = 0.0355). Pyogenic granuloma was observed in 1 patient from G2 and 2 patients from G1. There was no significant difference in recurrence rates between the groups (15% in G1 vs. 5% in G2; P = 0.2918). In both groups, graft dimensions tended to decrease slightly in the early postoperative period, followed by stabilization. CONCLUSIONS: Autologous fibrin glue demonstrated efficacy and safety comparable to commercial fibrin glue, making it a viable alternative to conjunctival graft fixation in primary pterygium surgery.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Flap Versus Tunneling for Horizontal Ridge Augmentation With FDBA and i-PRF: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.

AIM: This study evaluated the efficacy of conventional flap and tunneling techniques for horizontal alveolar ridge augmentation using freeze-dried bone allograft (FDBA) particles combined with injectable platelet-rich fibrin (i-PRF). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-five patients were randomly allocated to one of three groups (n = 15 each): conventional flap (CF), tunneling with membrane (TM), or tunneling without membrane (TnM). Preoperative ridge width was measured via cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). All augmentation procedures incorporated FDBA and i-PRF; an absorbable collagen membrane was applied in the CF and TM groups. Follow-up assessments, including CBCT imaging and histomorphometric analysis, were conducted 6 months postoperatively. For normally distributed data, ANOVA with Tukey's post hoc test and paired samples t-test were applied. Non-normally distributed data were analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis, Mann-Whitney U, and Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. RESULTS: Statistical analysis was performed on 43 patients. All groups demonstrated an increase in ridge width after 6 months. At the 2 mm level, the mean width gain was 1.28 mm (95% CI: 0.17 to 2.40) in the TM group, 2.85 mm (95% CI: 1.80 to 3.89) in the TnM group, and 1.95 mm (95% CI: 1.07 to 2.83) in the CF group. However, statistical analysis revealed no significant intergroup variation (p > 0.05). Histomorphometric assessments similarly demonstrated comparable outcomes across all groups, with no statistically significant differences observed (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Within the limitations of this study, the tunneling technique, regardless of membrane use, appears to be a clinically viable alternative to the conventional flap method for horizontal alveolar ridge augmentation. However, further studies with longer follow-up periods are required to substantiate these findings. TRIAL REGISTRATION: irct.behdasht.gov.ir identifier: IRCT 20101204005305N21.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Whole genome sequencing of unusual Hepatitis C virus subtypes and drug resistance analysis during direct-acting antiviral therapy in India.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Pangenotypic direct-acting antivirals (DAA) are effective against highly prevalent Hepatitis C virus (HCV) subtypes, but have been clinically validated almost exclusively in high-income countries. Unusual HCV subtypes may carry natural polymorphisms, potentially impacting DAA susceptibility. We conducted full-genome characterization and resistance analysis of unusual HCV subtypes in patients receiving DAA treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this prospective hospital-based study, eligible patients were screened for anti-HCV antibodies and active infection was confirmed by diagnostic 5'NCR-based HCV RNA detection. Genotyping was performed by core region sequencing, and viral load quantified by real-time PCR. For whole genome sequencing, multiplex primers were designed using alignments of global reference sequences. Sequencing was carried out using the Oxford Nanopore Technology platform. Phylogenetic analysis used multiple sequence alignment and the HCV-GLUE resource for resistance-associated substitution (RAS) analysis. RESULTS: Predominant genotype was genotype 3 in 64.3% (n = 45); genotype 6 in 21.4% (n = 15); and genotype 1 in 14.2% (n = 10). Unusual HCV subtype 6xa was detected in two patients and showed no NS5A resistance mutations. One genotype 3b patient relapsed at 24 weeks post-DAA treatment completion and carried NS5A resistance-associated substitutions 30 K and 31 M both at baseline and at relapse, conferring high-level resistance to NS5A inhibitors. CONCLUSION: This is the first report from India of whole genome sequencing of HCV subtype 6xa. The identification of NS5A resistance mutations in the 3b relapse case underscores challenges for global HCV elimination strategies.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Plasma proteomics reveal SERPINA1 and CD59 as candidate biomarkers for COVID-19 severity stratification and prognosis prediction.

BACKGROUND: COVID-19 has been closely associated with coagulation abnormalities. However, existing biomarkers, including D-dimer and fibrin degradation products (FDP), exhibit limited accuracy in stratifying disease severity and predicting long-term clinical outcomes. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to use proteomic analysis to identify plasma biomarkers associated with COVID-19 severity and prognosis, and validate their predictive utility for mortality and thromboembolic complications. METHODS: Plasma proteomic profiles were analyzed across three COVID-19 severity classes. Differential expression analysis and functional analysis were performed. Clustering analysis was used to identify proteins correlated with disease severity. Candidate biomarkers were validated in an independent cohort. Predictive performance of the biomarkers for mortality, sepsis and venous thromboembolism was evaluated using bootstrap-corrected ROC analyses and multivariable regression analyses. RESULTS: Proteomic analysis revealed progressive involvement of the coagulation and complement pathway with increasing disease severity. SERPINA1 and CD59 were identified as candidate biomarkers and exhibited significantly higher plasma levels in severe cases. Bootstrap-corrected ROC analyses demonstrated strong predictive performance: SERPINA1 achieved AUCs of 0.775 and 0.924 for 30-day and 12-month mortality, and CD59 achieved AUCs of 0.720 for sepsis; the combined model further improved prediction of 12-month mortality (AUC 0.946) and sepsis (AUC 0.904), outperforming D-dimer and FDP. Multivariable regression confirmed their independent prognostic value. CONCLUSION: This exploratory study identifies SERPINA1 and CD59 as candidate prognostic biomarkers in COVID-19, highlighting the role of coagulation and complement-related pathways in disease severity and warranting further prospective validation.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Intravenous Tranexamic Acid Reduces Perioperative Blood Loss in Reduction Mammoplasty With Immediate Implant-Based Reconstruction: A Randomized, Triple-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative hematoma and oozing can compromise outcomes after reduction mammoplasty with immediate reconstruction. Intravenous (IV) tranexamic acid (TXA) is antifibrinolytic, but prospective evidence in this setting is limited. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to determine whether a single pre-incision dose of IV TXA reduces perioperative blood loss and fibrinolytic activation vs placebo. METHODS: In this randomized, triple-blinded, placebo-controlled trial, 60 women (American Society of Anesthesiologists I/II, 18-75 years) undergoing bilateral reduction mammoplasty with immediate implant-based reconstruction received TXA 10 mg/kg in 100 mL saline or placebo 10 min before incision. The primary outcome was total blood loss within 24 h (intraoperative suction + swab plus drain output). Secondary outcomes were perioperative changes in hemoglobin, D-dimer and fibrinogen, and complications within 30 days. Intention-to-treat analyses were performed. RESULTS: All patients completed follow-up. Total blood loss was lower with TXA than with placebo (mean ± standard deviation: 221.1 ± 72.4 vs 298.1 ± 90.6 mL; mean difference -77.0 mL; 95% CI, -122.4 to -31.6; P = .001). Intraoperative loss and 24 h drain output were also reduced. Postoperative D-dimer rise was attenuated with TXA (0.31 ± 0.15 vs 0.49 ± 0.22 µg/mL; P = .002); hemoglobin decline was smaller. No thromboembolic, neurologic, or allergic events occurred; no skin-flap necrosis was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Pre-incisional IV TXA safely reduces perioperative bleeding and fibrinolytic activity after reduction mammoplasty. These findings support incorporation of IV TXA into perioperative protocols. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2 (THERAPEUTIC): For image description, please refer to the figure legend and surrounding text.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Treatment of Established Groin Lymphatic Complications After Arterial Surgery: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: To systematically review the effectiveness and safety of interventions for established groin lymphatic complications after arterial vascular surgery. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL were searched from inception to May 28, 2025. This review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251061708) and conducted according to PRISMA, PRISMA-S, and Synthesis Without Meta-analysis (SWiM) guidance. Eligible studies included adults with established groin lymphorrhea/lymphocutaneous fistula or seroma/lymphocele after arterial exposure in the common femoral or iliofemoral region. Prophylactic studies were excluded. Two reviewers independently screened studies and assessed full texts. Prespecified outcomes were resolution, time to resolution, length of stay, surgical site infection, wound complications, reintervention, and recurrence. Owing to substantial heterogeneity, meta-analysis was not performed. RESULTS: Eighteen retrospective single-center studies were included; no randomized trials were identified. Reported strategy-family totals were operative control (n = 240, including 55 dye-assisted cases), intranodal lymphangiography with glue embolization (n = 39), intracavitary or chemical instillation (n = 52), negative-pressure wound therapy (n = 20), radiotherapy (n = 206), and drainage or aspiration alone (n = 7). One additional cohort compared nonsurgical with surgical management. Definitions, follow-up windows, and statistical reporting were inconsistent, and arm-level denominators were frequently incomplete. Risk of bias was serious to critical across the evidence base, mainly because of retrospective design, confounding by indication, treatment-selection bias, inconsistent outcome definitions, and incomplete reporting. Using GRADE principles, certainty of evidence was very low across strategies and phenotypes. Across study arms, conduit-directed approaches for external leak and cavity-directed approaches for encapsulated collections often achieved control, but valid comparative inference was not possible. CONCLUSION: Evidence is limited to small retrospective series with heterogeneous definitions, serious to critical risk of bias, and very low certainty. Reliable comparisons between interventions cannot currently be made. Standardized phenotype-specific definitions and outcome reporting are needed to support prospective studies and future trials.

Humans↗