Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “cystatin C eGFR”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

3 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2026

A bi-directional Mendelian randomization study of sarcopenia-related traits and renal function.

The association between sarcopenia and renal function has been reported in observational studies; however, the directionality and potential causal nature of these associations remain uncertain. We assessed whether genetically predicted sarcopenia-related traits are associated with renal function and vice versa using bidirectional Mendelian randomization (MR). We conducted a bidirectional two-sample MR analysis using publicly available European-ancestry GWAS summary statistics for appendicular lean mass (ALM), hand-grip strength (left and right), and walking pace, and for renal function (cystatin C-based estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFRcystatin C] and urinary albumin excretion [UAE]). Causal estimates were primarily obtained using inverse-variance weighted (IVW) models, complemented by sensitivity analyses (MR-Egger intercept, weighted median/mode, MR-PRESSO, Radial MR, and leave-one-out). In forward MR, genetically predicted walking pace was positively associated with eGFRcystatin C. Genetically predicted ALM and grip strength (right and left) were inversely associated with UAE. In reverse MR, genetically predicted UAE was inversely associated with ALM and right-hand grip strength. Estimates were broadly consistent across sensitivity analyses, and outlier-robust analyses (MR-PRESSO/Radial MR) yielded similar results. These findings provide genetic evidence consistent with bidirectional relationships between sarcopenia-related traits and renal function (particularly UAE), under standard MR assumptions. Given potential limitations (e.g., heterogeneity, pleiotropy, and possible sample overlap), the results should be interpreted cautiously and complemented by other lines of evidence.

Humans↗
PubMed2025

Polygenic Risk Scores Predicting Estimated GFR Validated With Iohexol Clearance.

INTRODUCTION: Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified hundreds of single nucleotide variants (SNVs) associated with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). eGFR has been used as a proxy phenotype because of the complexity and cost of measured GFR (mGFR) in large studies. Because eGFR is influenced by non-GFR factors, these GWAS results may be biased compared with a hypothetical study using mGFR. We aimed to investigate this by comparing aggregate measures of genetic effects on mGFR and eGFR. METHODS: We studied 1492 persons from the Renal Iohexol Clearance Survey (RENIS) cohort, a representative sample of the general population in Northern Norway without preexisting cardiovascular disease, kidney disease, or diabetes. We measured iohexol-clearance, and genotyping was performed with a microarray chip enriched for GFR-related SNVs. We compared the performance of 3 published polygenic risk scores (PGS) developed for creatinine-based eGFR (eGFRcr), narrow-sense heritability (h2) and the mean effect of SNVs on mGFR, eGFRcr, cystatin C-based eGFR (eGFRcys) and eGFRcr-cys. RESULTS: The performance of the PGS differed for mGFR and the 3 eGFRs, with best performance for prediction of eGFRcr (P < 0.05). However, when the beta coefficients of the SNVs in the 3 PGS were estimated in the RENIS-cohort, their magnitude was 11% to 46% greater for mGFR than for the 3 eGFR methods in 8 of 9 comparisons (P < 0.05). mGFR had higher h2 (0.47) than eGFRcr (0.21), eGFRcys (0.37), and eGFRcr-cys (0.42). CONCLUSIONS: SNVs with non-GFR effects on creatinine and cystatin-C influence GWAS results. The results of GWAS using eGFR should be validated using experimental and other more precise methods.

chronic kidney disease↗
PubMed2026

Effects of 12 weeks of resistance and concurrent training with graded protein intakes on lipid profile, kidney and liver biomarkers in middle-aged to older women.

PURPOSE: To examine secondary lipid, kidney-related, and liver-enzyme responses to three protein intakes during resistance training (RT) alone or the same RT plus cycling (CT) in middle-aged to older women. METHODS: In this randomized 2&#xd7;3 factorial trial, 108 women aged 40-77 years were assigned to RT or CT and 0.8, 1.6, or 2.2 g kg-1 d-1 protein for 12 weeks. This complete-case secondary analysis included 83 participants. Linear mixed-effects models tested Time &#xd7; Training, Time &#xd7; Protein, and Time &#xd7; Training &#xd7; Protein effects, with false-discovery-rate-adjusted omnibus tests and Holm-adjusted contrasts. RESULTS: Triglycerides, total cholesterol, LDL-C, and apolipoprotein B decreased and HDL-C increased in all conditions. Lipid changes differed by protein condition, and several were more favorable with CT; however, CT comprised RT plus additional cycling and greater exercise exposure. Urea, blood urea nitrogen, creatinine, the blood urea nitrogen-to-creatinine ratio, and cystatin C increased, whereas three eGFR estimates decreased. Responses differed mainly between 0.8 and the two higher protein conditions, with little evidence of differences between 1.6 and 2.2 g kg-1 d-1. ALT, AST, and GGT differed by protein condition; AST and GGT also showed training-dependent responses. CONCLUSIONS: The dietary and exercise interventions modified lipid and clinical-chemistry responses. Because energy and food composition were not fully matched and CT added cycling to RT, the findings do not isolate protein dose or exercise modality. Changes in eGFR estimates and liver enzymes do not establish organ injury or long-term safety.

Humans↗