Search PubMedSearch

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “class I KIT variants”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

2 recordsLinked to original sources

Well-differentiated systemic mastocytosis: Genetics, mast cell immunophenotypes, and KIT autophosphorylation.

BACKGROUND: Well-differentiated systemic mastocytosis (WDSM) is a rare myeloid neoplasm where the genetic etiology is often unknown. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to assess WDSM patients for novel KIT variants, mast cell (MC) aberrant immunophenotypes, and KIT autophosphorylation patterns. METHODS: Next-generation sequencing, MC immunophenotyping, and KIT autophosphorylation studies were performed. RESULTS: Among 454 SM patients, there were 432 with KIT p.D816V+ SM and 4 with KIT p.D816Y+ SM-notably, none of these patients had WDSM. Of the remaining patients, we identified 7 with WDSM (1.5%) and 2 relatives with mastocytosis in skin. Next-generation sequencing revealed that 6 of 9 subjects carried known or novel germline KIT variants corresponding to regions outside of codon 816. Three patients had germline KIT p.K509I; 2 had germline KIT p.A533D; 1 had two germline KIT variants p.F681L and p.M541L; and 3 had no KIT mutation. Intracellular expression of CD2 and CD25 and less robust expression of CD30 was observed in MCs from WDSM patients. By developing a novel transient transfection assay in 293T cells, we found that unlike KIT p.D816F/V/Y variants that exhibit nearly exclusive intracellular localization and strong ligand-independent autophosphorylation (class II), WDSM-associated KIT variants showed enhanced ligand-dependent autophosphorylation relative to wild type (class I). CONCLUSIONS: Our study doubles the number of KIT variants identified in WDSM patients. No KIT p.D816V+ SM patient had WDSM. Intracellular CD2 and CD25 expression was more robustly detected in MCs from WDSM patients compared to CD30.

Humans

PIK3CA Polymorphisms in Cervical Cancer: Differential Impact of rs6443624 and rs141178472.

BACKGROUND: Cervical cancer remains a major cause of mortality in low- and middle-income settings. We assessed whether two PIK3CA single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) rs6443624 (A/C) and rs141178472 (C/T) are associated with disease risk, clinicopathological features, and survival. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a prospective case control study at a tertiary center, 154 participants were enrolled (77 cases, 77 controls). Genomic DNA was isolated from FFPE cervical tumors (QIAamp DNA FFPE Tissue Kit) and genotyped using TaqMan allelic discrimination. Clinicopathological variables (FIGO stage, histology, grade, treatment, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes [TILs]) were abstracted from records. Genotype distributions were compared by Pearson chi-square. Associations with clinicopathological features used chi-square/Fisher's exact as appropriate; ANOVA compared age across genotypes. Overall survival (OS) was estimated by Kaplan-Meier and compared with the log-rank test; mean OS with SE and 95% CI is reported. RESULTS: Cases were predominantly locally advanced at presentation and squamous histology; most were moderately differentiated. rs6443624 differed significantly between cases and controls (&#x3c7;&#xb2;=21.1, p<0.001), with CC over-represented in cases and CA less frequent. rs141178472 showed no significant case control difference (&#x3c7;&#xb2;=2.9, p=0.086). For OS, rs6443624 showed a significant genotype effect (log-rank &#x3c7;&#xb2;=23.45, p=0.001): AA had the poorest survival, CA the longest, CC intermediate. rs141178472 was not associated with OS (&#x3c7;&#xb2;=1.06, p=0.588). Genotype clinicopathological correlations for stage group, grade, TILs, and treatment were non-significant or inconsistent, with some comparisons limited by small sample sizes. CONCLUSION: The PIK3CA rs6443624 variant appears to influence both susceptibility and prognosis in cervical cancer, highlighting its potential as a biomarker for molecular risk stratification. Validation in larger, multi-center cohorts incorporating HPV/p16 assessment and extended follow-up is warranted to confirm its clinical relevance.

Humans