Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “chromatin loop”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2026

UnionLoops: a workflow for calling chromatin loops across related Hi-C datasets with improved specificity, precision, and sensitivity.

Chromatin loop calling from chromatin interaction data often exhibits substantial variability across related samples. We present UnionLoops, a computational workflow for chromatin loop calling across multiple related samples. UnionLoops integrates information across datasets to determine positions and dataset-specificity of looping interactions. It constructs a unified candidate loop set, applies consistent filtering and aggregation, and evaluates loop support across samples. We demonstrate that UnionLoops increases sensitivity for detecting shared chromatin loops, reduces spurious sample-specific calls, and improves concordance with independent genomic features, including CTCF and cohesin occupancy. UnionLoops enables improved biological interpretation of chromatin loop organization and dynamics across related conditions.

Chromatin↗
PubMed2024

PRC1 and CTCF-Mediated Transition from Poised to Active Chromatin Loops Drives Bivalent Gene Activation.

Polycomb Repressive Complex 1 (PRC1) and CCCTC-binding factor (CTCF) are critical regulators of 3D chromatin architecture that influence cellular transcriptional programs. Spatial chromatin structures comprise conserved compartments, topologically associating domains (TADs), and dynamic, cell-type-specific chromatin loops. Although the role of CTCF in chromatin organization is well-known, the involvement of PRC1 is less understood. In this study, we identified an unexpected, essential role for the canonical Pcgf2-containing PRC1 complex (cPRC1.2), a known transcriptional repressor, in activating bivalent genes during differentiation. Our Hi-C analysis revealed that cPRC1.2 forms chromatin loops at bivalent promoters, rendering them silent yet poised for activation. Using mouse embryonic stem cells (ESCs) with CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene editing, we found that the loss of Pcgf2, though not affecting the global level of H2AK119ub1, disrupts these cPRC1.2 loops in ESCs and impairs the transcriptional induction of crucial target genes necessary for neuronal differentiation. Furthermore, we identified CTCF enrichment at cPRC1.2 loop anchors and at Polycomb group (PcG) bodies, nuclear foci with concentrated PRC1 and its tethered chromatin domains, suggesting that PRC1 and CTCF cooperatively shape chromatin loop structures. Through virtual 4C and other genomic analyses, we discovered that establishing neuronal progenitor cell (NPC) identity involves a switch from cPRC1.2-mediated chromatin loops to CTCF-mediated active loops, enabling the expression of critical lineage-specific factors. This study uncovers a novel mechanism by which pre-formed PRC1 and CTCF loops at lineage-specific genes maintain a poised state for subsequent gene activation, advancing our understanding of the role of chromatin architecture in controlling cell fate transitions.

Journal Article↗
PubMed2025

Proteins driving liquid-liquid phase separation and histone modifications cooperatively associate with chromatin looping and transcriptional regulation.

BACKGROUND: Although liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS) proteins are known to participate in genome organization and transcriptional regulation through the formation of biomolecular condensates, their functional interplay with other regulatory proteins and histone modifications in chromatin loop formation remains poorly characterized. By combining Hi-C chromatin interaction data with ChIP-seq profiles of 12, 27, and 24 LLPS proteins in GM12878, K562, and HepG2 cell lines, respectively, we identified chromatin loops associated with LLPS proteins and systematically analysed patterns of cooperative protein binding and histone modification enrichment within these loop-associated peaks. RESULTS: We identified 162, 313, and 431 chromatin loops associated with LLPS proteins in GM12878, K562, and HepG2 cell lines, respectively. These loops were relatively small in size and predominantly anchored at enhancer regions. Examination of cooperative binding of proteins within loop-associated peaks revealed that transcriptional repressor IKZF1, HDAC1, and SAP130 most frequently co-localized with LLPS proteins in GM12878, K562, and HepG2 cells, respectively. Further analysis of histone modification enrichment patterns revealed that active histone modifications, such as H3K4me2, H3K4me3, H3K9ac, and H3K27ac, co-localized at loop-associated peaks, with H3K4me1 exhibiting additional specific co-localization with these four histone modifications at enhancer-localized loop-associated peaks. Notably, bivalent chromatin domains where H3K27me3 co-localized with active histone modifications were identified at promoter-localized loop-associated peaks in HepG2 cells, and elevated H3K27me3 occupancy at these peaks was associated with transcriptional repression of target genes. Moreover, quantitative RNA-seq analysis revealed that the expression of target genes associated with enhancer-promoter loops was correlated with both the binding of LLPS proteins and the enrichment patterns of histone modifications within their ChIP-seq peaks at loop anchors. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that LLPS proteins may cooperate with transcriptional repressors to facilitate chromatin looping. Furthermore, local enrichment of histone modifications at loop-associated peaks provides additional regulatory control over chromatin architecture and gene transcription.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Chiron3D: an interpretable deep learning framework for understanding the DNA code of chromatin looping.

MOTIVATION: Three-dimensional folding of the genome into structures such as chromatin loops is essential for gene regulation. Current experimental methods for mapping these structures, like Hi-C and HiChIP, are labor-intensive and require repeated assays to test hypothesized mutation effects. This motivates the need for predictive approaches that reveal the sequence determinants of chromatin loops. RESULTS: In this work, we present a novel and interpretable computational pipeline for predicting CTCF-mediated chromatin loops. We propose Chiron3D, a DNA-only model trained in a cell-type specific manner to predict CTCF HiChIP contact maps. By leveraging pre-trained embeddings from a foundation model, our approach is competitive with baselines that take CTCF ChIP-seq as additional input, while enabling nucleotide-level attribution to the input DNA sequence. Using our framework, we provide likely mechanistic insights into the physical control of loop dynamics. Specifically, we find that the strength of the loop extrusion anchorage site is largely governed by the amount and binding affinity of CTCF sites at the boundaries. Furthermore, we reveal that loop stability is regulated by the amount of intra-loop CTCF binding sites, where fewer intra-loop sites are associated with greater loop stability. Using targeted, single-nucleotide edit simulations with Chiron3D, we show that both loop strength and stability can be precisely controlled. Together, these results provide novel mechanistic insights into the physical control of genome organization and highlight the potential of decoding the DNA sequence logic in silico. AVAILABILITY: The Chiron3D pipeline is made available at https://github.com/BoevaLab/Chiron3D.

Chromatin↗
PubMed2026

Rapid reduction in global chromatin loop size after acute STAG2 reconstitution in human cancer cells.

Truncating mutations in the tumor suppressor STAG2, which encodes a component of the cohesin complex, are prevalent across diverse human cancers. Here, we report that acute reconstitution of physiological STAG2 levels in STAG2-mutant human glioblastoma multiforme cancer cells triggers a rapid reduction in the size of chromatin loops genome-wide. Despite this global change in chromatin loop size, early transcriptional responses to STAG2 restoration are limited to a small number of genes, most of which are induced by STAG2 reconstitution. Notably, the growth-suppressor EFEMP1 (Fibulin-3), a secreted glycoprotein that functions as an extracellular matrix-associated inhibitor of glioblastoma growth and invasion, was the only gene consistently induced across all experimental models. The most robust and conserved STAG2-induced genes all reside within intense chromatin loops whose anchors and overall intensity did not appear to change in response to STAG2 reconstitution. These findings suggest that inactivating mutations of STAG2 promote neoplastic transformation by alleviating a restriction on chromatin loop size, allowing for an expanded range of chromatin interactions that disrupts the maintenance of a tumor-suppressive transcriptome.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

cPRC1.2 and CTCF-mediated transition from poised to active chromatin loops at bivalent genes.

Polycomb Repressive Complex 1 (PRC1) and CCCTC-binding factor (CTCF) are critical regulators of 3D chromatin architecture that influence cellular transcriptional programs. Although the role of CTCF in chromatin organization is well-known, the involvement of PRC1 is less understood. In this study, we identify an unexpected role for the canonical Pcgf2-containing PRC1 complex (cPRC1.2) in activating bivalent genes. Hi-C revealed that cPRC1.2 forms chromatin loops at bivalent promoters, rendering them poised for activation. Pcgf2 deletion disrupts cPRC1.2 loops and impairs the transcriptional induction of crucial target genes necessary for neuronal differentiation. Furthermore, we identify CTCF enrichment at cPRC1.2 loop anchors and at Polycomb group (PcG) bodies, suggesting that PRC1 and CTCF cooperatively regulate chromatin loops. Through virtual 4C and other genomic analyses, we discover that establishing neuronal progenitor cell (NPC) identity involves a switch from cPRC1.2-mediated chromatin loops to CTCF-mediated active loops. Our results suggest a novel mechanism by which pre-formed PRC1 loops at lineage-specific genes maintain a poised state for subsequent CTCF-mediated active loops and gene activation in cell fate transitions.

CCCTC-Binding Factor↗
PubMed1989

Satellite DNA I in chromatin loops of rat pachytene chromosomes and in spermatids.

Biotinylated rat satellite DNA I probe p93-50 was used to visualize the chromatin of surface-spread rat pachytene chromosomes. Fluorescein isothiocyanate (FITC)-conjugated avidin produces a beaded fluorescence pattern along the chromatin loops that insert in the centromeric region of the synaptonemal complex (SC), the paired cores of homologous chromosomes. The number of fluorescent beads ranges from zero for centromeres without satellite DNA I homologous to probe p93-50, to several hundred for satellite-rich centromeric regions. For the chromosomes that can be identified, the relative amount of satellite DNA is chromosome specific. No satellite DNA I was detected at the non-centromeric ends of the chromosomes or interstitially. DNase-digested nuclei or isolated SCs did not have detectable amounts of satellite DNA in the centromeric regions of the chromosomes or in the residual SCs. The fate of the satellite DNA was followed during spermiogenesis. In the round spermatid the centromeric regions, which appear to be attached to the nuclear envelope, are still distinct and have converging loops of fluorescent chromatin. At later stages there are fewer but still bright fluorescent patches. Satellite DNA I is still detectable in the mature sperm head. These results demonstrate the organization of satellite DNA I in the chromatin loops at the centromeric regions, and they forecast the analysis of chromosome organization in unprecedented detail with a variety of probes in surface spreads of meiotic prophase chromosomes.

Animals↗
PubMed1992

Chromatin loops and transcriptional regulation.

The existence of a supermolecular structure in the eukaryotic nucleus, involving loops of chromatin attached at irregularly spaced points to the nuclear matrix, is now well established. Quite a bit is known concerning the DNA sequences involved in the attachment. However, the function of this highly organized structure remains largely unknown. In this review, we attempt to provide an overview of present knowledge of nuclear loop structure, and to critically summarize recent studies that provide new insights as to function. We derive the conclusion that the loop structure is very likely one in which DNA topology can be locally regulated by topoisomerase activity, and is most probably modified during development.

Animals↗
PubMed2025

Improved cohesin HiChIP protocol and bioinformatic analysis for robust detection of chromatin loops and stripes.

Chromosome Conformation Capture (3 C) methods, including Hi-C (a high-throughput variation of 3 C), detect pairwise interactions between DNA regions, enabling the reconstruction of chromatin architecture in the nucleus. HiChIP is a modification of the Hi-C experiment that includes a chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) step, allowing genome-wide identification of chromatin contacts mediated by a protein of interest. In mammalian cells, cohesin protein complex is one of the major players in the establishment of chromatin loops. We present an improved cohesin HiChIP experimental protocol. Using comprehensive bioinformatic analysis, we show that a dual chromatin fixation method compared to the standard formaldehyde-only method, results in a substantially better signal-to-noise ratio, increased ChIP efficiency and improved detection of chromatin loops and architectural stripes. Additionally, we propose an automated pipeline called nf-HiChIP ( https://github.com/SFGLab/hichip-nf-pipeline ) for processing HiChIP samples starting from raw sequencing reads data and ending with a set of significant chromatin interactions (loops), which allows efficient and timely analysis of multiple samples in parallel, without requiring additional ChIP-seq experiments. Finally, using advanced approaches for biophysical modelling and stripe calling we generate accurate loop extrusion polymer models for a region of interest and provide a detailed picture of architectural stripes, respectively.

Chromatin↗
PubMed1989

Electron microscopic studies on chromatin loop of rat ascites hepatoma cells.

Isolated nuclei from rat ascites hepatoma cells were treated with 0.09% detergent Joy and chromatin, protruded from the nucleus, was observed with an electron microscope. It was demonstrated that most, but not all of the protruded chromatin fibers had a loop structure. The protrusion of chromatin from the nucleus was 3 microns in average length. A high magnification view showed that the protruded chromatin consisted mainly of beaded nucleosomal fiber. Therefore, the chromatin loop size at the level of nucleosomal fiber was estimated to be at least 6 microns in length.

Animals↗
PubMed2026

Engineering chromatin loops to control cell fate: LoopID reveals catalytic-independent functions of epigenetic regulators.

Enhancer-promoter (E-P) interactions are central to cell-type-specific transcriptional programs, yet the molecular machinery that establishes and maintains these loops has remained poorly defined. A recent study by Jiang et al, published in Nature Genetics, presents a series of transformative discoveries that redefine our understanding of E-P interactions and their role in gene regulation and cell fate determination. The research introduces LoopID, a chromatin-interaction-based proteomic platform that, for the first time, enables systematic identification of protein components, termed the "looposome," localized specifically at chromatin looping anchors. Using LoopID, they profile the "looposome" in mouse embryonic stem cells (ESCs) and uncover an unexpected, catalytic-independent role for the histone demethylase JMJD2 (KDM4) in organizing chromatin architecture through phase-separated condensates. Beyond mechanism, the study demonstrates that targeted assembly of JMJD2 condensates at defined genomic loci can engineer E-P interactions driving cellular reprogramming toward pluripotent and two-cell-like states. Together, these findings represent not only a major technical advance but also a conceptual leap-establish LoopID as a foundational technology for dissecting chromatin structure, introduce a new conceptual framework for epigenetic regulators as structural organizers, and provide a powerful strategy to manipulate cell fate by rewiring three-dimensional (3D) genome architecture.

Animals↗
PubMed1992

The attachments of chromatin loops to the nucleoskeleton.

It is widely assumed by cell biologists that chromatin is looped by attachment to some nuclear skeleton. 'Structural' attachments might be mediated through specific sequences; these would be attached in most cells in an organism, underlying the basic structure of the mitotic chromosome and persisting throughout interphase. 'Functional' attachments might also exist, perhaps if active polymerases are attached to the skeleton and replication and transcription occur as DNA is reeled through them. Cells of different tissues--and even cells of the same tissue--would have different attachments of this type. Problems associated with demonstrating these two kinds of attachment are discussed. We find little good evidence for 'structural' attachments and explore the idea that 'functional' attachments are the only kind that exist: 'functional' attachments involving active transcription units might be stable enough to organize chromatin during both interphase and mitosis, but 'dynamic' enough to allow duplication of attached sequences without disrupting loops.

Animals↗
PubMed1990

The size of chromatin loops in HeLa cells.

It is widely believed that the chromatin fibre is organized into loops during interphase, with the loop being implicated as an important unit of nuclear function. However, there remains little direct evidence for looping, with estimates of loop size varying widely. This has led to the suggestion that some loops, or even all of them, arise artefactually during isolation as chromatin aggregates so easily. We have now investigated the effect of isolation procedure on loop size using HeLa cells encapsulated in agarose to allow easy manipulation. Loop size in various derivatives (i.e. nuclei, nucleoids, matrices and scaffolds) critically depended on procedure; some (or all) of their loops are artefacts. The loop size in derivatives isolated using the most 'physiological' conditions was 86 kb; this remained unchanged throughout the cell cycle. This loop size is probably an average of a range of loops of between 5 and 200 kb.

Cell Cycle↗
PubMed1989

Chromatin loop structure of the human X chromosome: relevance to X inactivation and CpG clusters.

Part of the higher-order structure of chromatin is achieved by constraining DNA in loops ranging in size from 30 to 100 kilobase pairs; these loops have been implicated in defining functional domains and replicons and possibly in facilitating transcription. Because the human active and inactive X chromosomes differ in transcriptional activity and replication, we looked for differences in their chromatin loop structures. Since the islands of CpG-rich DNA at the 5' ends of X-linked housekeeping genes are the regions where functional differences in DNA methylation and nuclease sensitivity are found, we looked for scaffold association of these sequences after extraction of histones with lithium diiodosalicylate. Specifically, we examined the 5' CpG islands within the hypoxanthine phosphoribosyltransferase, glucose 6-phosphate dehydrogenase, P3, GdX, phosphoglycerate kinase type 1, and alpha-galactosidase loci in human lymphoblasts obtained from individuals with 1 to 4 X chromosomes. Although we detected no scaffold-associated regions near these genes, we found several such regions at the ornithine transcarbamylase and blood clotting factor IX loci. Our results suggest that the CpG islands are excluded from the nuclear scaffold and that even though transcriptionally active, housekeeping genes are less likely than X-linked tissue-specific genes to be scaffold associated. In all cases, the pattern of scaffold association was the same for loci on active and inactive X chromosomes.

Animals↗
PubMed1978

Circles in spermatocyte chromatin loops. Electron microscopy and AgAs-NORs studies.

We describe the production of circles in chromomeric loops during the pachytene stage of the spermatocytes. These circles are found attached to chromatin or already free in the nucleoplasm. Each circle measures an average of 3700 A in circunference. We suggest that such circles might indicate the presence of tandem repetitions.

Animals↗
PubMed1987

The localization of ultraviolet-induced excision repair in the nucleus and the distribution of repair events in higher order chromatin loops in mammalian cells.

Several lines of evidence indicate that eukaryotic DNA is arranged in highly supercoiled domains or loops, and that the repeating loops are constrained by attachment to a nuclear skeletal structure termed the nuclear matrix. Active genes are transcribed at the nuclear matrix and during replication the loops are reeled through fixed matrix-associated replication complexes. We have investigated whether the repair of DNA damage also occurs in the nuclear matrix compartment. Biochemical analysis of confluent normal human fibroblasts, ultraviolet (u.v.)-irradiated with 30 J m-2 and post-u.v. incubated in the presence of hydroxyurea, did not show any evidence for the occurrence of repair synthesis at the nuclear matrix either 30 min or 13 h after irradiation. Autoradiographic visualization of repair events in single DNA halo-matrix structures confirmed the biochemical observations. At a biologically more relevant dose of 5 J m-2 repair synthesis seems to initiate at the nuclear matrix, although only part of the total repair could be localized there. In u.v.-irradiated (30 J m-2) normal human fibroblasts post-u.v. incubated in the presence of hydroxyurea and arabinosylcytosine for 2 h, multiple single-stranded regions are generated in a DNA loop as a result of the inhibition of the excision repair process. Different biochemical approaches revealed that most of the single-stranded regions are clustered, indicating that the repair process itself is non-random or that domains in the chromatin are repaired at different rates. Preferential repair of certain domains in the chromatin was shown to occur in xeroderma pigmentosum cells of complementation group C (XP-C). In XP-C cells these domains are localized near the attachment sites of DNA loops at the nuclear matrix. In contrast, xeroderma pigmentosum cells of complementation group D as well as Syrian hamster embryonic cells with limited excision-repair capacities, revealed a random distribution of repair events in DNA loops. The preferential repair of matrix-associated DNA in XP-C cells may be related partly to repair of transcriptionally active DNA and this may account for the ability of XP-C cells, in contrast to XP-D cells, to recover u.v.-inhibited synthesis of DNA and RNA.

Animals↗
PubMed1986

Distribution of u.v.-induced repair events in higher-order chromatin loops in human and hamster fibroblasts.

The repair of u.v.-induced damage in human and rodent cells was investigated at the level of DNA loops attached to the nuclear matrix. After 2 h post-u.v. incubation, DNase I digestion studies revealed a 3- to 4-fold enrichment of repair-labeled DNA at the nuclear matrix in four xeroderma pigmentosum cell strains belonging to complementation group C. This non-random distribution was not affected by treatment with sodium butyrate. In other cells with limited excision repair, i.e. two xeroderma pigmentosum cell strains of complementation group D and Syrian hamster embryonic cells, as well as in HeLa cells and normal human fibroblasts, no enrichment of repair-labeled DNA at the nuclear matrix was observed. Visualization of repair events in DNA loops by autoradiography of DNA halo-matrix structures confirmed the biochemical observations. The presence or absence of preferential repair of nuclear matrix-associated DNA paralleled the presence or absence of inhomogeneity in the distribution of T4 endonuclease-V-sensitive sites. A detailed analysis of repair events in xeroderma pigmentosum cells of complementation group C showed that after 2 h post-u.v. incubation, repair events were found at both attachment sites in a limited number of loops and that large domains of loops were not subjected to repair.

Animals↗
PubMed2026

3D chromatin remodeling during domestication defines novel targets for crop improvement.

Three-dimensional (3D) genome folding shapes gene regulation, yet the genetic underpinnings linking 3D genome evolution to phenotypic innovation during domestication remain elusive. Using population-scale Hi-C profiling of 34 semi-wild and 267 cultivated allotetraploid cottons, we generated a pan-3D genome atlas capturing extensive diversity in topologically associating domains (TADs) and chromatin loops. Chromatin interactome-wide association studies identified 105 TAD reconfigurations and 58 loop rewirings that were established as the 3D chromatin basis of fiber quality, boosting heritability estimates for fiber strength by 16% and fiber length by 20%. We reveal that domestication selection within sequence-defined sweeps fixed 57% of 3D conformation signatures, thereby decoupling sequence-level from chromatin-level selection and shifting the subgenome expression balance of 39 homoeologs in cultivated cotton. Sequence-based modeling and mutational analyses identified the C2H2 zinc-finger protein YY1 as a conserved mediator of 3D genome organization. This study provides a resource for redefining precision-breeding paradigms by harnessing cryptic 3D chromatin targets.

3D genome↗