Search PubMedSearch

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “cancer genetics”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Double heterozygous germline pathogenic variants in patients referred to a tertiary cancer genetics clinic in Singapore.

BACKGROUND: The increasing use of multigene panel testing has led to a rise in the identification of double heterozygous (DH) pathogenic variants in cancer patients, although their frequency and clinical relevance remain poorly characterised, particularly in Asian populations. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of 5,178 patients referred to a tertiary cancer genetics clinic in Singapore. DH pathogenic variants were defined as the presence of two or more distinct pathogenic or likely pathogenic germline variants identified by multigene panel testing. Clinical, pathological, and family history data were reviewed and analysed using appropriate non-parametric and exact statistical methods. RESULTS: Among 2,802 index patients with available genetic test results, 593 (21.2%) carried at least one pathogenic/likely pathogenic variant. DH pathogenic variants were identified in 21 individuals (0.75%), of which 9 were patients with breast cancer, 10 with non-breast malignancies, and 2 were cancer-free. The frequency of multiple primary cancers was 26.3% in DH variant carriers, 23.3% in single variant carriers, and 16.5% in those with no pathogenic variants. The median ages of first cancer diagnosis were 47, 44, and 48 years. Several DH combinations involved moderate- or low-penetrance genes, and some clinically unsuspected variants were detected only through broad multigene testing. CONCLUSION: DH pathogenic variants represent a rare subgroup that is increasingly detected through multigene panel testing. Their phenotypic expression is variable, and the influence of additional pathogenic variants remains uncertain. Our findings emphasise the need for tailored genetic evaluation and further research to guide evidence-based management for this complex patient population.

Asia

Family history in an oncology clinic. Implications for cancer genetics.

Detailed family histories of cancer were solicited from 200 consecutively ascertained cancer patients undergoing treatment in an oncology clinic. Approximately 18% had two or more first-degree relatives with cancer of any anatomic site. In several cases, striking familial aggregations of cancer fulfilled more rigorous criteria for hereditary cancer syndromes, including early age at onset of generally late-occurring tumors, characteristic tumor patterns, vertical transmission, and collateral family lines similarly afflicted. Review of preexisting clinic charts demonstrated that, in most cases, the family history of cancer had been either omitted altogether, reported as negative despite substantial evidence to the contrary, or, if noted as positive, not pursued or acted on. Family history can be more successfully utilized in recognition of suggestive familial cancer aggregations, ultimate identification of hereditary cancer syndromes, and control of cancer in clinical practice.

Adolescent

[BRCA1 Gene's Mutations And Hereditary Breast Cancer: Genetic, Biological, And Clinical Aspects].

INTRODUCTION: Hereditary breast cancer accounts for approximately 5 to 10% of all breast cancer cases. Mutations in the BRCA1 gene, which plays a central role in DNA repair and cell cycle regulation, are the main cause of these familial forms and are strongly associated with aggressive subtypes, particularly triple-negative breast cancer. METHODS: A narrative literature review was conducted using biomedical databases (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar) between January 2024 and June 2025. Eligible publications addressed the genetic, biological, epidemiological, and clinical aspects of BRCA1 in hereditary breast cancer. RESULTS: BRCA1 ensures genomic stability through its roles in DNA repair, cell cycle checkpoints, and transcriptional regulation. Most mutations are truncating or missense variants, with some reported as founder mutations (e.g., c.68_69delAG, c.5266dupC, 943ins10). Women carrying germline BRCA1 mutations have an estimated lifetime risk of 56-87% of developing breast cancer, with a strong association with aggressive molecular subtypes, especially triple-negative breast cancer. CONCLUSION: A comprehensive understanding of BRCA1 mutations is crucial to enhance prevention, screening, and personalized management of hereditary breast cancer. In low-resource settings, the integration of genetic testing and counseling remains a major challenge and a public health priority to reduce disparities in cancer care.

Humans

Interpreting cancer genetics through a two-step "evolutionary cascade hypothesis": bridging neutral and selective perspectives.

BACKGROUND: DNA mutations are the fundamental engines of cancer, driving its initiation and progression. The forces that fuel malignancy are also the architects of evolution, shaping life through genetic variations. Mutations, in fact, can emerge naturally from endogenous processes, such as oxidative DNA damage or errors in replication, as well as induced by external factors, including cosmic radiation and chemical carcinogens. MAIN BODY: A key question in cancer research is whether tumor evolution is primarily governed by selective bottlenecks, neutral evolution, or dynamic genetic plasticity. In this work, we examine cancer as a disease driven by evolutionary processes rooted in fundamental biological requirements, including sustained proliferation and nutrient utilization. We hypothesize that the accumulation of mutations activates an evolutionary switch, enabling tumor cells to acquire an enhanced capacity for survival, adaptation, and growth at rates far exceeding typical evolutionary timescales. We propose the "evolutionary cascade hypothesis," a unifying framework that integrates these models into a coherent sequence. At its core lies the failure of DNA repair mechanisms, representing a critical transition in cancer progression. This shift marks the transition from an initial non-Darwinian, neutral phase to a Darwinian, more deterministic phase. CONCLUSIONS: As predictive models of tumor evolution advance through genomic big data and artificial intelligence-driven analysis, the future of cancer treatment may extend beyond targeting individual mutations to disrupting the underlying evolutionary mechanisms that sustain malignancy. This paradigm shift could redefine therapeutic strategies and ultimately improve patient outcomes.

Humans

Prostate Cancer, Genetic Susceptibility, and Risk of Chronic Non-Urological Complications.

BACKGROUND: Chronic nonurological complications are common among prostate cancer (PCa) survivors; however, their spectrum, magnitude, and genetic contribution remain poorly characterized. METHODS: We evaluated 15 commonly reported nonurological complications and tested their associations with exposure to PCa and disease-specific polygenic risk scores (PRS) in the UK Biobank (UKB; N&#x2009;=&#x2009;219,133). Analyses were conducted using cause-specific Cox proportional-hazards models within a full-cohort framework with time-updated PCa status, delayed entry at study recruitment, and age as the underlying time scale. RESULTS: After recruitment, incident PCa was diagnosed in 13,780 men, of which 1,656 (12.02%) had metastatic PCa (mPCa). Risks for seven complications were higher among men with PCa, adjusting for genetic background (all p&#x2009;<&#x2009;0.05), including osteoporosis, venous thromboembolism, depression, and four primary cancers (bladder, kidney, colorectal, and pancreatic). Risks were consistently stronger among men exposed to mPCa than non-mPCa; for example, the hazard ratio (HR) (95% confidence interval) for osteoporosis was 1.88 (1.63-2.18) for any PCa, 4.67 (3.11-7.01) for mPCa, and 1.75 (1.50-2.04) for non-mPCa. Elevated risks for three additional complications (coronary artery disease, type 2 diabetes and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) were observed only among men with mPCa. The risks for these ten complications were further increased among men with higher disease-specific PRS; for example, the HR for osteoperosis in mPCa patients in the top PRS quartile was 13.57 (8.24-22.34) compared with men without PCa (p&#x2009;<&#x2009;0.001). CONCLUSION: PCa diagnosis and inherited genetic susceptibility jointly contribute to increased risks of multiple chronic non-urological complications among survivors.

Humans

Comprehension of skin cancer genetic risk feedback in primary care patients.

Few studies have examined comprehension and miscomprehension of genetic risk feedback for moderate-risk genes in the general population. We examined the prevalence and nature of accurate and inaccurate genetic risk feedback comprehension among those who received genetic testing for melanocortin-1-receptor (MC1R) gene variants that confer moderate melanoma risk. Participants (N&#x2009;=&#x2009;145 Albuquerque, NM) were tested as part of a randomized controlled trial. Two weeks after receiving MC1R genetic risk feedback, participants answered open-ended questions regarding their reactions to the MC1R feedback report. Participants' comprehension of their feedback (average-risk or higher-risk for melanoma) was evaluated through qualitative analysis of open-ended responses. Most participants demonstrated comprehension of their feedback results (i.e., 63% of average-risk participants [ARPs]; 51% of higher-risk participants [HRPs]). Miscomprehension was evident in fewer participants (i.e., 16% of ARPs, 11% of HRPs). A few ARPs misunderstood the purpose of testing, whereas a few HRPs reported confusion about the meaning of their risk feedback. Some participants' responses to the open-ended questions were too ambiguous to ascertain comprehension or miscomprehension (i.e., 21% of ARPs, 38% of HRPs). Taken together, these findings suggest that genetic testing feedback for MC1R risk variants is largely comprehensible to general population participants. This study adds to the work examining comprehension and usage of common, moderate risk genetic information in public health contexts. However, to maximize the utility of genetic risk information in the general population, further research is needed to investigate and address areas where common genetic risk feedback misunderstandings occur.

Genetic testing

Integrating genetic predictors into subsequent breast cancer risk prediction in survivors of childhood cancer.

PURPOSE: Female survivors of childhood cancer are at high risk for developing breast cancer. The contributions of most general population primary breast cancer genetic predictors to this risk have not been explored. METHODS: Analyses included females who survived &#x2265;5 years after their childhood cancer diagnosis with available array (N&#x2009;=&#x2009;2096, subsequent breast cancer [SBC]=218) or whole-genome sequencing (WGS; N&#x2009;=&#x2009;3292, SBC=101) data from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study and St. Jude Lifetime Cohort. We computed 99 externally-validated primary breast cancer polygenic risk scores (PRS). Using deep-coverage WGS, ClinVar-annotated pathogenic/likely pathogenic (P/LP) variants in breast cancer susceptibility genes were identified. Cox proportional hazards models assessed associations with SBC risk, adjusting for treatments and genetic ancestry. RESULTS: Among 5388 female survivors (genetic ancestry, European: N&#x2009;=&#x2009;4,752; African: N&#x2009;=&#x2009;444; East Asian: N&#x2009;=&#x2009;192), 319 developed SBC. Most (90.9%) PRSs were nominally associated with SBC risk (P&#x2009;<&#x2009;0.05), but effect sizes varied substantially. PRSs with superior discriminatory ability had greater genome-wide coverage (e.g., 6.4 million-variant PRS, HR per SD&#x2009;=&#x2009;1.71, 95% CI&#x2009;=&#x2009;1.43 to 2.05; P&#x2009;=&#x2009;4.2x10-9) and 7.7-fold higher odds (P&#x2009;=&#x2009;7.0x10-4) of including variants in multiple DNA damage repair pathways compared with PRSs with weaker risk associations. Among survivors with WGS, 1.6% carried P/LP variants in clinical testing panel genes, which was associated with a 7.4-fold greater risk (95% CI&#x2009;=&#x2009;3.16 to 17.19). Including genetic factors improved SBC risk prediction by age 40 (P&#x2009;<&#x2009;0.001) compared to treatment exposures alone. CONCLUSIONS: Externally-validated primary breast cancer genetic susceptibility predictors are relevant for SBC risk prediction and should be prioritized for risk stratification in survivors.

Journal Article

A single-cell lens into the co-evolution of genotypes and phenotypes in cancer.

Genetic heterogeneity and clonal outgrowths are observed even in otherwise healthy human tissues, shaping the genetic composition of cell populations in non-malignant disease and during physiological ageing. This clonal mosaicism likely provides the pre-cancerous seeds for malignant transformation. Once a tumour arises, clonal evolution poses a major challenge to achieving cure, as clonal diversification provides an expanded number of substrates upon which therapy can act as a selective pressure, leading to the selection of resistant clones that ultimately fuel disease recurrence. Understanding somatic clonal evolution requires not only mapping genetic diversity but also defining the resulting phenotypes that provide a fitness advantage to mutated clones. This Review discusses multimodal single-cell technologies that enable the measurement of genotypes and additional molecular features from the same cell. These technologies unveil mutant-specific phenotypic traits, often show cell-state specificity in genotype-phenotype effects and can define therapeutic vulnerabilities for precision elimination of disease-propagating mutant cells. Furthermore, the combination of phylogenetic reconstruction with phenotypic measurements allows for the temporal mapping of clonal evolution and phenotypic plasticity. These breakthroughs have created a unique opportunity to define, directly in primary human samples, the mechanisms underlying clonal expansion in both healthy and malignant tissues.

Journal Article

Development and pilot testing of a prostate cancer polygenic risk report.

BACKGROUND: Polygenic risk scores (PRS) are increasingly being incorporated into clinical care, yet optimal strategies for communicating PRS results to patients and clinicians remain undefined. Effective report design is critical to ensure comprehension and appropriate use, particularly for complex conditions such as prostate cancer where screening decisions are nuanced. We developed and pilot tested patient-facing materials to communicate integrated polygenic and monogenic risk for prostate cancer in the context of a randomized clinical trial. METHODS: We designed a summary report and accompanying Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) page to communicate prostate cancer genetic risk within the Prostate Cancer, Genetic Risk, and Equitable Screening Study (ProGRESS). Materials were developed through an iterative, multidisciplinary process informed by existing literature on genomic risk communication. We conducted semi-structured interviews with a national sample of eight men eligible for prostate cancer screening to evaluate comprehension, interpretation of visual elements, perceived usefulness, and preferences for improvement. Interviews were transcribed and analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis. RESULTS: Participants generally found the summary report and FAQ page understandable and visually engaging. Graphical displays of absolute risk, particularly pictograph arrays, facilitated comprehension and helped contextualize risk. Visual cues such as color and bold formatting effectively directed attention to key information, with red coloring perceived as particularly salient for high-risk results. In contrast, more complex visualizations, including bell curves and incidence curves, were frequently misunderstood or not interpreted as intended. Participants expressed a desire for clearer guidance regarding next steps and additional accessible information, suggesting supplementary resources such as hyperlinks or QR codes. Concerns about readability included small font size and high text density. CONCLUSIONS: In this qualitative pilot study, patient-facing materials for communicating prostate cancer PRS were generally well received, with specific design features such as simple visualizations and clear formatting enhancing understanding. Findings highlight the importance of intuitive risk displays and actionable guidance in PRS reporting. These results provide practical insights to inform the design of genomic risk reports as PRS-based prostate cancer screening approaches move toward clinical implementation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05926102; date of registry: July 3, 2023.

Aged

Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) in the cancer family syndrome.

We present findings on plasma CEA in relatives and spouses from six kindreds manifesting the Cancer Family syndrome. The CEA distributions per se were transformed to square root CEA to correct for skewness and kurtosis. Significant effects of age and duration of smoking were adjusted for by linear regression. Relatives were classified as: 1) cancer patients, 2) individuals at high genetic cancer risk (one or more first-degree relatives affected, and 3) individuals at low genetic cancer risk (no first-degree relatives affected) for statistical comparisons. Unrelated spouses were also classified into corresponding groups according to their directline mate's status. Cancer patients and relatives at high genetic risk had significantly greater mean square root CEA than relatives at low genetic risk, and, surprisingly, unrelated spouses had mean levels of square root CEA which were similar to that in the corresponding cancer risk class of their direct-line mates. Our results suggest the existence of both a genetic and connubial effect on CEA, presumably due to a common environmental agent acting in concert with the degree of genetic predisposition to oncogenesis in this syndrome.

Carcinoembryonic Antigen

The surgeon, genetics, and cancer control: the Cancer Family Syndrome.

A family manifesting the Cancer Family Syndrome has been evaluated extensively from the medical and genetic standpoint. Findings of excess occurrence of carcinoma of the colon and endometrium, multiple primary cancer, early age of onset, and autosomal dominant mode of genetic transmission mandate a program of increased surveillance and cancer education. Prophylactic surgical implications are provided for certain of these enormously high cancer risk patients.

Adult

[Mendelian genetics and cancer (author's transl)].

Two hundred different mendelian genes can have a cancerogenic effect in man, but it is difficult to make out between the genetic and the environmental part. Acute lymphoblastic leukemia is an example that the actual cancerogenic factor can be environmental and not genetic. Genetically controlled tumors can result from two successive mutations, the first being in some cases prezygotic. The first genetic accident can be a birth defect or a chromosomic fragility syndrome. The histocompatibility major system can play a role in the frequence and in the evolutive type of some cancers. The most frequent hereditary syndromes which can be associated with cancers are quoted here.

Child

Genetics and cancer of the gastrointestinal system. Annual oration in honor of Herbert M. Stauffer, M.D., 1914-1970.

Familial aggregations of tumors may occur in virtually all organ systems. The gastrointestinal tract is a frequent site for the development of cancers having an hereditary basis. Their recognition has important relevance to cancer control and prevention. In addition, detailed clinical and laboratory studies of inherited tumors may throw light upon the cause of the more common forms of gastrointestinal neoplasms. Radiologists must have a working knowledge of the genetic and diagnostic elements of each in order to fulfill their responsibilities to the patient, the patient's family and the referring physician.

Adenocarcinoma