Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “bootstrap aggregation”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

3 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2025

Learning directed acyclic graphs for ligands and receptors based on spatially resolved transcriptomic data of ovarian cancer.

To unravel the mechanism of immune activation and suppression within tumors, a critical step is to identify transcriptional signals governing cell-cell communication between tumor and immune/stromal cells in the tumor microenvironment. Central to this communication are interactions between secreted ligands and cell-surface receptors, creating a highly connected signaling network among cells. Recent advancements in in situ-omics profiling, particularly spatial transcriptomic (ST) technology, provide unique opportunities to directly characterize ligand-receptor signaling networks that power cell-cell communication. In this paper, we propose a novel statistical method, LRnetST, to characterize the ligand-receptor interaction networks between adjacent tumor and immune/stroma cells based on ST data. LRnetST utilizes a directed acyclic graph model with a novel approach to handle the zero-inflated distributions of ST data. It also leverages existing ligand-receptor regulation databases as prior information, and employs a bootstrap aggregation strategy to achieve robust network estimation. Application of LRnetST to ST data of high-grade serous ovarian tumor samples revealed both common and distinct ligand-receptor regulations across different tumors. Some of these interactions were validated through both a MERFISH dataset and a CosMx SMI dataset of independent ovarian tumor samples. These results cast light on biological processes relating to the communication between tumor and immune/stromal cells in ovarian tumors. An open-source R package of LRnetST is available on GitHub at https://github.com/jie108/LRnetST.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Phylogenomic subsampling and upsampling for efficient evolutionary analyses of big data.

Long runtimes, high memory demands, and reliance on high-performance computing impede phylogenomic analyses. We review a scalable phylogenomic subsampling with upsampling (PSU) framework to address this challenge, which reduces runtime and memory requirements by orders of magnitude. In PSU, small subsamples of sites from a concatenated alignment are analyzed, which are expanded by upsampling before inference, and the resulting inferences are aggregated to obtain evolutionary estimates. PSU harnesses the fact that the computational cost of maximum likelihood analysis is strongly influenced by the number of distinct site patterns in the concatenated alignment, whereas statistical power depends primarily on the amount of evolutionary information represented by the total number of sites and substitutions. By reducing the former while restoring the latter through upsampling, PSU can approximate many full-alignment analyses at substantially lower computational cost. Analysis of simulated and empirical datasets shows that PSU can accurately estimate bootstrap support values, select the optimal substitution model, test evolutionary hypotheses, and infer branch lengths, divergence times, and associated uncertainty measures. PSU also provides distributions of inferred clade support across independent subsamples, enabling detection of conflicting phylogenetic signals that may remain hidden in conventional bootstrap analysis of concatenated alignments. Automated tuning of subsample size, the number of subsamples, and the number of upsampling replicates make PSU practical. We suggest that PSU is a general approach for scalable phylogenomic inference using a broad range of statistical methods. By enabling analyses of genome-scale alignments on commodity hardware, PSU broadens research access and reduces environmental and infrastructural costs of big-data phylogenomics.

Phylogeny↗
PubMed2026

Phylogenomic subsampling and upsampling for efficient evolutionary analyses of big data.

Long runtimes, high memory demands, and reliance on high-performance computing impede phylogenomic analyses. We review a scalable phylogenomic subsampling with upsampling (PSU) framework, in which small subsamples of sites from a concatenated alignment are expanded by upsampling before inference, and the resulting analyses are then aggregated to obtain evolutionary estimates. PSU harnesses the fact that the computational cost of maximum likelihood analysis is strongly influenced by the number of distinct site patterns in the concatenated alignment, whereas statistical power depends primarily on the amount of evolutionary information represented by the total number of sites and substitutions. By reducing the former while restoring the latter through upsampling, PSU can approximate many full-data analyses at substantially lower computational cost. Analysis of simulated and empirical datasets shows that PSU can accurately estimate bootstrap support values, select the optimal substitution model, test evolutionary hypotheses, and infer branch lengths, divergence times, and associated uncertainty measures, while reducing runtime and memory requirements by orders of magnitude. PSU also provides distributions of inferred clade support across independent subsamples, enabling detection of conflicting phylogenetic signals that may remain hidden in conventional bootstrap analysis. Automated tuning of subsample size, the number of subsamples, and the number of upsampling replicates make PSU practical across diverse datasets. We suggest that PSU is a general strategy for scalable phylogenomic inference using a broad range of statistical methods. By enabling analyses of genome-scale alignments on commodity hardware, PSU broadens research access and reduces environmental and infrastructural costs of big-data phylogenomics.

confidence limits↗