SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “artificial intelligence (AI) tools”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

SourceResearch connectionFrom yearThrough year

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2026

Genomic profiling as an option for ovarian cancer diagnostics.

INTRODUCTION: Ovarian cancer (OC) is a highly heterogeneous and lethal gynecological malignancy. Precision oncology has shifted the management paradigm to comprehensive molecular profiling. Genomic-based diagnostics are now a clinical necessity for accurate prognostic stratification and the rational selection of targeted therapeutics, such as PARP and immune checkpoint inhibitors. AREAS COVERED: This review evaluates current literature regarding the distinct genomic landscapes defining OC histotypes to underlined the role of molecular profiling in the diagnostic field of OC. We discuss the practical implementation, technical aspect, and clinical validity of the main molecular diagnostic platforms, focusing on tissue-based Comprehensive Genomic Profiling (CGP) and Homologous Recombination Deficiency (HRD). Furthermore, we explore emerging translational data on liquid biopsy (LBx) applications. EXPERT OPINION: While current tissue-based methodologies provide critical baseline data, the OC diagnostic paradigm must pivot from static testing to proactive and longitudinal tracking. Integrating advanced LBx approaches enables a real-time monitoring of dynamic parameters as minimal residual disease (MRD) and acquired resistance. Integrating these dynamic blood-based assays with multi-omic profiling and artificial intelligence (AI)-driven tools allows a full understanding of the complex tumor behavior.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Leptospira-host interactions: advancing next-generation vaccines and diagnostics.

SUMMARYLeptospirosis, a widespread zoonotic disease caused by pathogenic Leptospira species, remains a major public health challenge, particularly in tropical and subtropical regions. Despite advances in understanding Leptospira biology and pathogenesis, effective disease control continues to be limited by the lack of rapid, early diagnostics, and broadly protective vaccines. This review comprehensively examines recent progress in deciphering Leptospira-host interactions, with emphasis on key virulence factors, immune-evasion mechanisms, and host immune responses that influence disease outcomes. Particular focus is placed on the molecular and cellular basis of adhesion, invasion, immune modulation, and persistent colonization. We further discuss the limitations of current vaccines and diagnostic approaches, and highlight how emerging technologies, including pan-genomics, proteomics, reverse vaccinology, immunoinformatics, and omics-based antigen discovery, are facilitating the development of next-generation vaccines and diagnostics. Finally, we outline major translational challenges and future perspectives for improving clinical management, surveillance, and prevention of leptospirosis. The concepts discussed in this review may also provide broader insights into vaccine and diagnostic development for other zoonotic bacterial infections.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Biomarker-guided selection of intravesical therapy in high-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer: A contemporary review.

High-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer poses therapeutic challenges, with significant rates of recurrence and progression with standard intravesical bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) therapy. Current surveillance strategies lack accurate risk stratification models to predict individual treatment response and personalized treatment options. Simultaneously, there are no well-validated alternatives to replace the current gold-standard approach based on clinical and pathologic features. This review examines emerging biomarkers and advanced technologies with the potential to enhance patient selection and personalize intravesical therapy in HR-NMIBC. Artificial intelligence(AI)-driven histopathologic tools, such as the computer histological AI biomarker, have demonstrated the ability to identify non-responders to standard therapy using whole-slide digital pathology images. In parallel, radiomics-enhanced imaging has shown promise in assessing tumor biology and immune microenvironment features predictive of BCG responsiveness. Liquid biopsy, especially urine tumor DNA analysis, is now available in the arsenal to detect minimal residual disease, stratify recurrence risk, and predict treatment response even before clinical or radiographic evidence of recurrence. Tissue-based genomic profiling has also revealed molecular alterations associated with treatment resistance, though additional validation is needed. Together, these next-generation biomarkers may represent a pivotal shift toward precision oncology in bladder cancer and their incorporation into NMIBC future clinical guidelines is both anticipated and necessary.

BCG-unresponsive disease↗

PubMed2026

Diagnostic Performance of Machine Learning for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Early and accurate diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and its organ involvement is essential. Previous reviews of machine learning (ML) in SLE combined heterogeneous tasks and validation strategies and may have overinterpreted model performance. OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the diagnostic performance of ML and deep learning (DL) models for 3 clinically distinct SLE-related tasks: SLE classification or diagnosis, lupus nephritis (LN) diagnosis, and neuropsychiatric systemic lupus erythematosus (NPSLE) discrimination. We also assessed methodological quality and certainty of evidence. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and IEEE Xplore were searched from January 2014 to April 2026. Eligible peer-reviewed diagnostic accuracy studies developed or validated ML or DL models for 1 of the 3 prespecified tasks, used an accepted reference standard, and provided data for a 2×2 contingency table. Bivariate random-effects meta-analyses with the Hartung-Knapp-Sidik-Jonkman adjustment were used to pool sensitivity and specificity. We reported 95% prediction intervals (PIs), assessed risk of bias using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies for Artificial Intelligence tool (QUADAS-AI; Viknesh Sounderajah [Imperial College London]), and evaluated certainty of evidence using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation framework for diagnostic test accuracy. RESULTS: Twenty-nine studies were included: 17 for SLE classification, 5 for LN diagnosis, and 7 for NPSLE discrimination. In the primary task-stratified analysis, pooled sensitivity was 0.91 (95% CI 0.86-0.94; 95% PI 0.56-0.99), and pooled specificity was 0.94 (95% CI 0.91-0.96; 95% PI 0.69-0.99), with low heterogeneity (I²=23.9% and 22.9%, respectively). DL models showed a sensitivity of 0.93 and specificity of 0.95, compared with 0.88 and 0.94 for traditional ML models. Certainty of evidence was high for most analyses but low for LN diagnosis because of inconsistency and imprecision. All studies were retrospective, and only 9 of 29 (31%) performed independent external validation. Overall risk of bias was high or unclear in 22 of 29 (75.9%) studies. No study reported model calibration, decision-curve analysis, or net clinical benefit. CONCLUSIONS: ML models showed promising diagnostic accuracy across 3 distinct SLE-related tasks, but wide PIs, limited external validation, and pervasive risk of bias restrict conclusions about real-world generalizability. Prospective multicenter studies with standardized tasks and reference standards, independent external validation, and formal assessment of calibration and clinical utility are required before clinical implementation.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Artificial intelligence-based tumour infiltrating lymphocyte quantification in patients with triple-negative breast cancer: an independent validation study.

BACKGROUND: Tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) are a robust prognostic marker in patients with triple-negative breast cancer. Artificial intelligence (AI)-derived computational tools assessing TILs could improve efficiency, but require independent validation against clinical outcomes. We aimed to compare the prognostic performance of AI-derived TIL scores with pathologist-scored TILs in a large, prospectively collected dataset pooled from randomised controlled trials. METHODS: CATALINA was an independent, external validation study using prospectively collected long-term clinical outcome data pooled from seven randomised clinical trials conducted at multiple sites. We independently evaluated two previously validated AI pipelines that generate five computationally assessed tumour-infiltrating lymphocyte (cTIL) scores by masked, independent deployment of locked models. cTIL scores were correlated with the mean of the pathologist-scored stromal TILs (sTILs) in 220 digitised haematoxylin and eosin whole slide images in a cohort of patients with early-stage triple-negative or HER-2 positive breast cancer, previously scored by trained pathologists in a TIL-reproducibility study. Prognostic performance was assessed in a separate cohort of patients with early triple-negative breast cancer pooled from seven prospective, randomised adjuvant trials. Multivariable Cox regression models adjusted for clinicopathological factors and study heterogeneity assessed associations of cTIL score and sTIL score with invasive disease-free survival, distant disease-free survival, and overall survival. 5-year discrimination was estimated using time-dependent area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). FINDINGS: Individual data were collated from 1759 patients, of whom 1356 had complete clinicopathological data, pathologist sTIL scores, and cTIL scores available. Modest correlation (r 0·375-0·473) was observed between cTIL scores and the mean pathologist sTIL score. Both sTIL and cTIL were independently associated with 5-year invasive disease-free survival, distant disease-free survival, and overall survival after adjustment for clinicopathological factors (hazard ratio for invasive disease-free survival was 0·73 [95% CI 0·66-0·82]; q<0·0001, distant disease-free survival was 0·70 [0·61-0·79]; q<0·0001, and overall survival was 0·72 [0·63-0·82]; q<0·0001 for sTIL scores and 0·80 [0·73-0·89]; q<0·0001, 0·77 [0·69-0·86]; q<0·0001, and 0·79 [0·70-0·88]; q=0·0002, respectively, for percentage_lymphocyte scores). In models adjusted for clinicopathological variables and sTIL score, cTIL score did not maintain a statistically significant prognostic association. Both sTIL and cTIL scores improved the 5-year AUC over clinicopathological variables alone, while cTIL score did not significantly further improve AUC when combined with clinicopathological variables and sTIL score. INTERPRETATION: Two cTIL models deployed entirely without retraining or modification provided statistically significant prognostic information and improved risk discrimination compared with clinicopathological variables alone in this large, platform-based, independent validation study. Although cTIL score did not incrementally improve prognostication compared with models combining clinicopathological variables with sTIL score, these findings support the application of cTILs as a reproducible prognostic biomarker, particularly in settings where routine or widespread pathologist assessment is unavailable. FUNDING: Breast Cancer Research Foundation (USA).

Humans↗

PubMed2025

Generative AI Models in Time-Varying Biomedical Data: Scoping Review.

BACKGROUND: Trajectory modeling is a long-standing challenge in the application of computational methods to health care. In the age of big data, traditional statistical and machine learning methods do not achieve satisfactory results as they often fail to capture the complex underlying distributions of multimodal health data and long-term dependencies throughout medical histories. Recent advances in generative artificial intelligence (AI) have provided powerful tools to represent complex distributions and patterns with minimal underlying assumptions, with major impact in fields such as finance and environmental sciences, prompting researchers to apply these methods for disease modeling in health care. OBJECTIVE: While AI methods have proven powerful, their application in clinical practice remains limited due to their highly complex nature. The proliferation of AI algorithms also poses a significant challenge for nondevelopers to track and incorporate these advances into clinical research and application. In this paper, we introduce basic concepts in generative AI and discuss current algorithms and how they can be applied to health care for practitioners with little background in computer science. METHODS: We surveyed peer-reviewed papers on generative AI models with specific applications to time-series health data. Our search included single- and multimodal generative AI models that operated over structured and unstructured data, physiological waveforms, medical imaging, and multi-omics data. We introduce current generative AI methods, review their applications, and discuss their limitations and future directions in each data modality. RESULTS: We followed the PRISMA-ScR (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews) guidelines and reviewed 155 articles on generative AI applications to time-series health care data across modalities. Furthermore, we offer a systematic framework for clinicians to easily identify suitable AI methods for their data and task at hand. CONCLUSIONS: We reviewed and critiqued existing applications of generative AI to time-series health data with the aim of bridging the gap between computational methods and clinical application. We also identified the shortcomings of existing approaches and highlighted recent advances in generative AI that represent promising directions for health care modeling.

Artificial Intelligence↗

PubMed2026

Insecticidal peptides as sustainable tools for future agriculture.

The increasing global human population and the intensification of agriculture present unprecedented challenges for pest control. The escalating resistance of pests to conventional synthetic insecticides, coupled with ecological and health concerns, underscores the urgent need for innovative and sustainable management approaches. Insecticidal peptides, due to their structural diversity, molecular specificity, and biodegradability, are emerging as promising candidates for the development of next-generation bioinsecticides. This strategic roadmap synthesizes recent advances in peptide architectures, ranging from pore-forming scaffolds to designs targeting enzyme inhibition and mimicking neuroendocrine actions, with a focus on the molecular mechanisms underpinning their selectivity and efficacy. By integrating structure-function insights with translational frameworks, we identify critical knowledge gaps and propose a pathway toward biotechnological tools, including bioinspired synthesis, artificial intelligence (AI)-guided peptide engineering, and nanodelivery systems for controlled release. Our analysis positions peptide-based insecticides at the forefront of sustainable agriculture, with the potential to minimize off-target effects, reduce environmental impact, and enhance crop resilience in the face of global change.

Agricultural biotechnology↗

PubMed2026

Beyond data and technology: the need for new thinking to enable the era of precision prevention.

BACKGROUND: Global flagship initiatives increasingly advocate for proactive health maintenance to alleviate the growing burden on reactive, disease-focused healthcare systems. Precision prevention is conceived as the targeted modulation of causal pathways across the disease continuum, from latent risk and pre-disease states to clinical manifestation, surpassing conventional public health prevention strategies that prioritise managing population-level risk factors. Traditional discovery and implementation models, however, remain poorly aligned with the pace and breadth of scientific and technological advances. This review outlines key barriers to scaling precision prevention and argues for the integration of conceptual, methodological, and policy perspectives into a single implementation‑oriented framework. MAIN: Individualised risk stratification lies at the core of precision prevention. Genomics serves as a stable substrate for lifetime susceptibility assessment, while meaningful prediction in multifactorial chronic disease requires additional risk monitoring using dynamic intermediate molecular markers and high-resolution exposomic data. Machine learning and other artificial intelligence (AI) methods are increasingly helpful tools for integrating large, heterogeneous and temporally structured real-world data to generate personalised predictions of health trajectories. Trustworthy AI-enabled risk prediction or decision-support systems are expected to provide transparency about model logic, assumptions and performance. In discovery, existing diagnostic classifications and conventional case-control designs can obscure mechanistic heterogeneity. Shifting toward precision phenotyping and biologically grounded disease redefinition could reveal a new layer of molecular understanding. Evidence generation strategies that reflect the temporal change of disease, including high‑risk enrichment, surrogate endpoints, and adaptive, trajectory-based monitoring, are particularly important for common conditions with prolonged latency periods (e.g., cancer, cardiovascular disease). Features often dismissed as "noise", such as stochastic molecular variation and minimal exposures, may in fact encode meaningful individual-level signals and thus merit investigation. CONCLUSION: To shift healthcare from reactive treatment toward proactive health maintenance requires coordinated action from stakeholders to reshape the pillars of discovery, reform outcome assessments and modernise implementation strategies.

Humans↗

PubMed2025

Artificial intelligence in healthcare and medicine: clinical applications, therapeutic advances, and future perspectives.

Healthcare systems worldwide face growing challenges, including rising costs, workforce shortages, and disparities in access and quality, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. Artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a transformative tool capable of addressing these issues by enhancing diagnostics, treatment planning, patient monitoring, and healthcare efficiency. AI's role in modern medicine spans disease detection, personalized care, drug discovery, predictive analytics, telemedicine, and wearable health technologies. Leveraging machine learning and deep learning, AI can analyze complex data sets, including electronic health records, medical imaging, and genomic profiles, to identify patterns, predict disease progression, and recommend optimized treatment strategies. AI also has the potential to promote equity by enabling cost-effective, resource-efficient solutions in low-resource and remote settings, such as mobile diagnostics, wearable biosensors, and lightweight algorithms. Successful deployment requires addressing critical challenges, including data privacy, algorithmic bias, model interpretability, regulatory oversight, and maintaining human clinical oversight. Emphasizing scalable, ethical, and evidence-driven implementation, key strategies include clinician training in AI literacy, adoption of resource efficient tools, global collaboration, and robust regulatory frameworks to ensure transparency, safety, and accountability. By complementing rather than replacing healthcare professionals, AI can reduce errors, optimize resources, improve patient outcomes, and expand access to quality care. This review emphasizes the responsible integration of AI as a powerful catalyst for innovation, sustainability, and equity in healthcare delivery worldwide.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Artificial intelligence for dental caries detection: An umbrella review.

Artificial intelligence (AI) has been proposed as a tool to improve dental caries detection across imaging modalities; however, its clinical value remains uncertain. This umbrella review aimed to synthesize and critically appraise systematic reviews evaluating AI for caries detection and diagnosis. An umbrella review was conducted following PRIOR guidance (PROSPERO CRD420261340728). Searches were performed in MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar up to 15 March 2026. Methodological quality was assessed using AMSTAR 2, and overlap of primary studies was quantified using the corrected covered area (CCA). Seventeen systematic reviews were included, of which five reported diagnostic test accuracy meta-analyses using bivariate or HSROC models. Across these meta-analyses, pooled sensitivity ranged from 0.76 to 0.94 and specificity from 0.85 to 0.91. Most systems were based on deep learning models applied to bitewing radiographs and intraoral photographs. However, substantial heterogeneity was observed in imaging modalities, lesion thresholds, analytical tasks, and evaluation metrics. In addition, a high degree of overlap across reviews and recurrent methodological limitations, including reliance on retrospective datasets, limited external validation, and inconsistent reporting, substantially weaken the reliability of the evidence. Although AI models demonstrate high diagnostic performance under experimental conditions, current evidence does not support their use as stand-alone diagnostic tools. Their clinical applicability remains limited, and implementation should be restricted to decision-support contexts until robust prospective validation demonstrates meaningful impact on clinical decision-making and patient outcomes.

Dental Caries↗

PubMed2026

Decoding cancer with artificial intelligence: Transforming research, diagnosis, and therapy with future insights.

Cancer remains one of the leading global health burdens, with increasing complexity in genomic, imaging, and clinical datasets presenting significant challenges for effective management. Artificial intelligence (AI) has emerged as a powerful tool to address these challenges by enabling pattern recognition, knowledge integration, and data-driven decision-making. This review highlights recent advances in the application of AI across cancer research, diagnosis, and therapy. In research, AI accelerates drug discovery and repurposing, enhances genomic data interpretation, and facilitates biomarker identification through multi-omics integration. In diagnosis, AI has demonstrated high technical performance in radiology for lesion detection and image segmentation, in pathology for tumour grading and molecular prediction, and in liquid biopsy for non-invasive biomarker analysis. In therapy, AI supports precision medicine by predicting treatment responses, monitoring disease progression, and optimizing clinical trial design. Despite these advances, barriers such as data heterogeneity, algorithmic bias, interpretability, and regulatory challenges remain. Future directions, including explainable AI, federated learning, multimodal modelling, and digital twins, hold promise for translating AI-driven innovations into routine oncology practice. Significance Statement This review provides a timely synthesis of recent (2020-2025) advances in artificial intelligence across cancer research, diagnosis, and therapy, highlighting applications in drug discovery, genomics, multi-omics biomarker identification, and clinical decision-making. By integrating technological progress with translational and clinical relevance, this work serves as a valuable resource for bridging AI innovation with precision oncology practice. As a narrative review, the literature was identified through targeted PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar searches, combining terms for artificial intelligence, machine learning, and deep learning with cancer-related keywords, with priority given to peer-reviewed studies published between 2020 and 2025, seminal earlier works, and official regulatory or guideline documents. Within each domain, representative studies were selected to illustrate methodological diversity, clinical context, and current translational readiness rather than to provide exhaustive coverage of an extremely rapidly evolving field.

Artificial intelligence↗

PubMed2025

Enhanced fracture detection on radiographs with AI assistance for clinicians: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Emergency radiographic interpretation for fractures is prone to missed or misdiagnoses. Artificial intelligence (AI) is expected to become a powerful tool to assist clinicians in fracture detection. PURPOSE: A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to assess whether AI improves clinicians' ability to detect fractures on radiographs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A literature search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library for studies published between January 1, 2010, and October 10, 2025. A meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies was performed using a Summary Receiver Operating Characteristic (SROC) curve. The quality of included studies was assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 (QUADAS-2) tool. Subgroup analysis and meta-regression were conducted to explore potential sources of heterogeneity. RESULTS: A total of 26 studies were included . The pooled sensitivity of clinicians increased from 77% (95% CI: 72-81) to 87% (95% CI: 83-90) with AI assistance, while the pooled specificity improved from 88% (95% CI: 85-90) to 92% (95% CI: 89-94). The corresponding AUC values were 0.90 (95% CI: 0.87-0.92) before and 0.95 (95% CI: 0.93-0.97) after AI assistance. Eight studies were rated as high risk of bias. Subgroup analysis and meta-regression identified potential sources of heterogeneity, including fracture location, AI model type, high risk of bias, and reference standards. CONCLUSION: AI assistance significantly improves clinicians' diagnostic performance in detecting fractures on radiographs for extremity and trunk fractures.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

The impact of artificial intelligence on critical thinking and clinical reasoning in health professions education: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Critical thinking and clinical reasoning underpin healthcare professionals' ability to navigate uncertainties and deliver safe and effective care. With artificial intelligence (AI) advancement and growing adoption, AI-based educational tools are increasingly used to support these cognitive competencies' development. OBJECTIVE: To synthesize randomised and controlled clinical trials on AI-based educational tools in health professions education and examine their effects on critical thinking and clinical reasoning among health professions students. METHODS: Six electronic databases were searched from January 1, 2014 to July 28, 2025 was reviewed: PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, CINAHL, Scopus, Embase and Web of Science. Two independent reviewers performed data extraction and quality assessment using standardized JBI checklists. The GRADE approach was used to assess the certainty of evidence. Studies were pooled via random-effects meta-analyses or narrative syntheses. RESULTS: Fourteen randomised controlled trials and seven controlled clinical trials were included (n = 21). Meta-analyses revealed small to medium effect sizes for the surrogate clinical reasoning outcomes of performance-based assessment scores (SMD 0.68; 95% CI [0.38, 0.98], p-value = 0.00; I2 = 38%) and knowledge test scores (SMD 0.39; 95% CI [0.09, 0.69], p-value = 0.01; I2 = 79%). Critical thinking and clinical reasoning skills and dispositions were narratively synthesized, with majority of included studies favouring AI-based interventions but the evidence had low to very low certainty. CONCLUSION: AI-based educational interventions may improve critical thinking and clinical reasoning among health profession students, but the evidence is very uncertain. This review offers preliminary insights but does not allow identification of optimal interventions or discipline-specific recommendations due to small sample sizes and substantial intervention heterogeneity. Further research is required to draw definitive conclusions. PROTOCOL REGISTRATION: CRD42025634074.

Humans↗

PubMed2025

AutoPVPrimer: A comprehensive AI-Enhanced pipeline for efficient plant virus primer design and assessment.

Plant viruses pose a significant threat to global agriculture and require efficient tools for their timely detection. We present AutoPVPrimer, an innovative pipeline that integrates artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning to accelerate the development of plant virus primers. The pipeline uses Biopython to automatically retrieve different genomic sequences from the NCBI database to increase the robustness of the subsequent primer design. The design_primers_with_tuning module uses a random forest classifier that optimizes parameters and provides flexibility for different experimental conditions. Quality control measures, including the evaluation of poly-X content and melting temperature, increase primer reliability. Unique to AutoPVPrimer is the visualize_primer_dimer module, which supports the visual evaluation of primer dimers-a feature missing in other tools. Primer specificity is validated via primer BLAST, which contributes to the overall efficiency of the pipeline. AutoPVPrimer has been successfully applied to the tomato mosaic virus, proving its adaptability and efficiency. The modular design allows customization by the user and extends the applicability to different plant viruses and experimental scenarios. The pipeline represents a significant advance in primer design and provides researchers with an effective tool to accelerate molecular biology experiments. Future developments aim to extend compatibility and incorporate user feedback to consolidate AutoPVPrimer as an innovative contribution to the bioinformatics toolbox and a promising resource for the advancement of plant virology research.

DNA Primers↗

PubMed2026

Artificial intelligence in molecular diagnostics for pandemic preparedness.

INTRODUCTION: Molecular diagnostics focusing on the detection and analysis of nucleic acids are indispensable tools for early pathogen identification, transmission monitoring, and genomic surveillance during pandemics. Recent technological advances have broadened the diagnostic landscape, incorporating PCR-based methods, isothermal amplification, high-CRISPR-based amplification detection, and sequencing. Despite their diagnostic potential, widespread implementation remains limited by high validation costs, time and logistical constraints, the need for specialized professional knowledge, and a lack of adaptability in resource-limited settings. Artificial intelligence (AI) is increasingly recognized as a promising but challenging approach, offering tools that streamline assay development, automate data interpretation, and optimize real-time diagnostic performance. AREAS COVERED: This review introduces recently published AI tools with potential to enhance the in-silico design validation process of oligonucleotides for molecular assays. These cover tools for initial assay design and optimization to validation and continuous assay updates. The limitations, including concerns regarding data accuracy, the lack of transparency in data processing ('black box' models), and unresolved licensing and regulatory issues, are highlighted for each tool and as expert opinion. EXPERT OPINION: Collectively, these challenges currently confine most AI-based approaches to research settings and prevent their routine implementation in clinical molecular diagnostics. Their widespread adoption depends on addressing remaining technical, regulatory, and practical challenges.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Artificial intelligence in genitourinary oncology: publication trends and systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: To conduct an analysis of publication trends and a systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to characterize the current state of artificial intelligence (AI) use in genitourinary (GU) oncology, as AI has emerged as a transformative tool in healthcare with potential applications in diagnostics, treatment planning, and prognostication. METHODS: We searched the Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE), Excerpta Medica dataBASE (EMBASE; Ovid), and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) Ultimate for studies related to AI and GU oncology, excluding non-English papers, non-human studies, review articles, and articles using AI solely for manuscript writing. Publication trends were analysed from 2013 to 2023 and categorized by study design and cancer type. RCTs were evaluated through systematic review using Covidence (Veritas Health Innovation Ltd, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia) for screening and data extraction. Two reviewers independently assessed all studies, with risk of bias (RoB) evaluated using the Cochrane RoB 2.0 tool. RESULTS: Of 2409 articles identified, 1220 met inclusion criteria. These included 962 retrospective articles, 175 prospective studies, 79 studies with combined retrospective/prospective methods, and four RCTs. Studies most commonly addressed prostate (n = 923), renal (n = 274), and urothelial (n = 194) cancers. Publications grew from 14 in 2013 to 362 in 2023, with substantial acceleration in 2019. Four RCTs were identified - one in urothelial cancer and three in prostate cancer. Two RCTs evaluated AI-based diagnostics, demonstrating improved performance over conventional methods; the remaining two RCTs evaluated AI in prognostication and treatment planning, showing improved gains in imaging interpretation and operational efficiency. RoB varied across studies, primarily related to randomisation and deviations from intended interventions. CONCLUSIONS: Artificial intelligence research in GU oncology has grown, although high-level evidence from RCTs remains limited. Existing trials underscore AI's promise in diagnostics, prognostication, and treatment planning, and the rapidly evolving nature of this field warrants continued prospective investigation.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Exploring the use of machine and deep learning in genome-wide association studies: a comprehensive review.

The advent of high-throughput sequencing technologies has generated increasingly large and complex genomic datasets, necessitating analytical approaches capable of capturing high-dimensional and potentially nonlinear genetic interactions. This situation has significantly impacted the entire field of Genome-Wide Association Study (GWAS), whose primary goal is the identification of genomic traits and variants that are statistically associated with the risk of a disease. However, traditional GWAS methods may show reduced performance when applied to highly polygenic and nonlinear genetic architectures. Computational strategies from Artificial Intelligence (AI) and, in particular, from machine- and deep-learning may provide a powerful tool to overcome such limitations, especially by capturing nonlinear interactions and complex hidden regularities in large-scale data, which traditional GWAS approaches might overlook. To date, only a few approaches have been introduced and systematically assessed. In this review, we describe the main characteristics and limitations of standard statistical approaches for GWAS, the main uses of AI methods in computational genomics, and recent attempts to leverage AI strategies in GWAS. Particular attention will be devoted to key issues, such as the interpretability of methods and results, and the curse of dimensionality. More specifically, the review presents 30 methods designed to leverage AI in GWAS, as well as presenting a comprehensive set of evaluation metrics for their performance, also providing references to the most frequently used databases, and biobanks. Overall, this work may serve as a starting point for both dry- and wet-lab researchers, aiming to extract deeper insights from genomic data by moving beyond traditional linear additive assumptions, and leveraging large-scale datasets through AI-driven approaches.

Artificial intelligence↗

PubMed2026

The Role of Artificial Intelligence for Intimate Partner Violence Prevention: A Systematic Review.

INTRODUCTION: Intimate partner violence (IPV), encompassing physical, sexual, emotional and economic abuse, remains a pervasive global health concern. Traditional prevention efforts face obstacles such as underreporting, delayed detection and limited personalised support. Emerging artificial intelligence (AI) approaches offer new opportunities to enhance IPV prevention. AIM: This systematic review maps and synthesises evidence on AI-driven tools in IPV prevention based on studies published between 2004 and 2024. METHODS: Following PRISMA 2020 guidelines and PROSPERO registration, we searched PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, IEEE Xplore and Web of Science. Eligible studies explicitly evaluated AI technologies targeting IPV prediction, screening, intervention or support delivery. Study quality was appraised using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT). RESULTS: Of 1304 records initially identified, 41 studies met eligibility criteria. AI applications ranged from machine learning (ML) for risk prediction and natural language processing (NLP) for IPV detection in clinical and social media data, to image analysis for forensic evaluation and chatbot-based support. Predictive modelling demonstrated strong discriminative performance, while NLP-based screening detected IPV with notable sensitivity. Chatbots showed feasibility and user acceptability, but evidence of their direct impact on reducing IPV incidence was limited, with one randomised controlled trial showing a modest reduction. Key challenges identified included algorithmic bias, data privacy risks and barriers to integration across health and social care systems. DISCUSSION: AI-informed interventions show promise for improving IPV detection, risk assessment, and scalable support, but questions remain about long-term effectiveness, ethical fairness, transparency and equitable implementation. Future interdisciplinary research should address these concerns to responsibly deploy AI in IPV prevention. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: The findings highlight the importance of trauma-informed, culturally responsive care and provider training in AI applications. Nurse-led innovation and policy advocacy will be crucial for safe, equitable integration of AI in IPV prevention.

Artificial Intelligence↗