Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “aortic valve”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Aortic root replacement after previous surgical intervention on the aortic valve, aortic root, or ascending aorta.

BACKGROUND: Aortic root replacement after a previous operation on the aortic valve, aortic root, or ascending aorta remains a major challenge. METHODS: Records of 56 consecutive patients (44 men; mean age, 56.4 +/- 13.6 years) undergoing reoperative aortic root replacement between June 1994 and June 2005 were reviewed retrospectively. RESULTS: Reoperation was performed 9.4 +/- 6.7 years after the last cardiac operation. Indications for reoperation were true aneurysm (n = 14 [25%]), false aneurysm (n = 10 [18%]), dissection or redissection (n = 9 [16%]), structural or nonstructural valve dysfunction (n = 10 [18%]), prosthetic valve-graft infection (n = 12 [21%]), and miscellaneous (n = 1 [2%]). Procedures performed were aortic root replacement (n = 47 [84%]), aortic root replacement plus mitral valve procedure (n = 5 [9%]), and aortic root replacement plus arch replacement (n = 4 [7%]). In 14 (25%) patients coronary artery bypass grafting had to be performed unexpectedly during the same procedure or immediately after the procedure to re-establish coronary perfusion. Hospital mortality reached 17.9% (n = 10). Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed the need for unplanned perioperative coronary artery bypass grafting as the sole independent risk factor for hospital death (P = .005). Actuarial survival was 83.8% +/- 4.9% at 1 month, 73.0% +/- 6.3% at 1 year, and 65.7% +/- 9.0% at 5 years after the operation. One patient had recurrence of endocarditis 6.7 months after the operation and required repeated homograft aortic root replacement. CONCLUSION: Reoperative aortic root replacement remains associated with a high postoperative mortality. The need to perform unplanned coronary artery bypass grafting during reoperative aortic root replacement is a major risk factor for hospital death. The optimal technique for coronary reconstruction in this setting remains to be debated.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

[Minimally invasive approach for mitral valve, aortic valve, and atrial septal defect surgery].

We successfully introduced minimally invasive cardiac surgery (MICS) to japan by performing thoracoscopic clipping of a patent ductus arteriosus in July 1992. MICS via a small right parasternal incision (Cosgrove procedure) was applied for one patients with severe rheumatic mitral stenosis, one with severe aortic regurgitation, and one with atrial septal defect (ASD). Mitral valve replacement (MVR), aortic valve replacement (AVR), and direct closure of the ASD were performed successfully by MICS for the the first time in Japan. All three patients required no blood transfusion and had no complications postoperatively, being discharged from hospital at 15, 13, and 9 days after their operations. MICS was satisfactory for mitral valve and ASD operations, but AVR by this approach took much longer than by standard midline sternotomy due to the poor surgical field obtained via the small right parasternal incision. A minimally invasive approach for surgery on the aortic valve and ascending aorta may require transection of the sternum or some other method. MICS has several advantages, including less trauma and pain, faster patient recovery, shorter ICU and hospital stays, a lower cost, and a better cosmetic outcome. Therefore, it is better for the patient when it is feasible. MICS should develop and be applied to more patients with cardiovascular disease in the future. Some of the standard cardiovascular operations may soon be replaced by MICS.

Adult↗
PubMed1985

[Aortic ring abscess following bacterial endocarditis of the aortic valve and aortic valve replacement].

Valve replacement was performed in a 30-year-old male patient with acute aortic insufficiency due to bacterial endocarditis. During a routine examination three months later, an aortic ring abscess was found by echocardiography. In the following night, the patient was readmitted with acute anterior myocardial infarction. Coronary angiography showed a compression of the left coronary artery by the large ring abscess of the aortic valve. 48 hours after surgical revision of the aortic valve prosthesis and the ring abscess, the patient died due to pump failure.

Abscess↗
PubMed1999

An exceedingly low operative mortality given by stentless autologous, homologous, and heterologous aortic valves for aortic valve replacement.

Homologous, autologous, and heterologous stentless valves were implanted into 663 patients undergoing aortic valve replacement by standard conventional methods. An exceedingly low mortality rate was achieved for the whole series, with the last consecutive 311 patients experiencing zero mortality. This analysis encompasses the hospitals' total experiences with these three stentless valves and examines only the low and zero mortalities. The three stentless valves were the aortic allograft used as a root replacement in 374 patients (mean age 43 years, 8.8% for active endocarditis), the pulmonary autograft used as a root replacement (22 patients, mean age 34 years) and the Cryolife O'Brien Model 300 stentless composite porcine glutaraldehyde-preserved aortic xenograft (267 patients, mean age 73 years, 16% 80 years or older, 55% concomitant procedures). Overall mortality rate was 1.1%. The seven deaths were essentially non-valve- and non-procedure-related. Of the last consecutive 311 patients, the mortality rate has been zero (166 allografts, 22 autografts, and 123 stentless xenografts). As a result of a careful, planned introduction of each valve and good experience and training in implant techniques, this low mortality and consecutive zero mortality suggest a "modern-day gold standard."

Adolescent↗
PubMed2000

[Aortic valve replacement for aortic valve stenosis due to congenital bicuspid aortic valve with abnormal positioning of coronary orifice, pseudotendon, and persistent left superior vena cava, report of a case].

A patient was a 65-year-old female who had a complaint of palpitation was diagnosed aortic valve stenosis due to congenital bicuspid aortic valve with pseudotendon by the echocardiographic examination. We suspected left single coronary artery by the aortography and the coronary artery angiography. Aortic valve replacement and resection of pseudotendon was performed with Carbomedics supra-annular aortic valve (21 A). During surgery, persistent left superior vena cava was detected. High-posterior take-off right coronary artery was casually detected at aortic closure. Ventricular fibrillation due to insufficient supply of cardioplegic solution at right coronary area frequently occurred after cardio-pulmonary bypass and percutaneous cardiopulmonary support was required. The patient was discharged 32 days after the operation. Preoperative and intraoperative evaluation was important in the case of aortic valvular disease.

Aged↗
PubMed1992

[Echocardiographic assessment of aortic regurgitation and aortic root dilatation in bicuspid aortic valve].

Aortic regurgitation (AR) and aortic root dilatation in 29 consecutive patients with bicuspid aortic valves but without aortic root disease (20 males, and 9 females: aged 27-85 years) were studied using two-dimensional echocardiography. The normal ranges of aortic root dimensions were calculated from values of 185 normal subjects, as 95% confidence intervals. AR was observed in 17 patients by color flow mapping. In 12 of the 17 AR patients, no significant lesion of the aortic cusp was detected by two-dimensional echocardiography. These 12 AR patients were compared with 12 patients without AR. Increase in dimension of the aortic root was relatively frequent in the 12 AR patients at the aortic annulus (AA) (67 vs 17%, p < 0.05), and at the sinus of Valsalva (A1) (67 vs 17%, p < 0.05). At the ascending aorta 5 mm distal to the sinus of Valsalva (A2), the difference was not significant (58 vs 17%, p < 0.09). The 12 bicuspid AR patients without significant lesions of the aortic cusp were compared with 41 AR patients with normal tricuspid aortic valves. The frequencies of cases with increased aortic root dimension were 67 vs 46% (ns) at the AA, 67 vs 22% (p < 0.05) at A1 and 58 vs 5% at A2 (p < 0.01). Thus, aortic annular dilatation was thought to be the cause of AR in bicuspid and tricuspid aortic valves without significant lesions of the aortic cusps, and generalized dilatation of the aortic root was more frequent in bicuspid AR patients than in tricuspid AR patients.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Analytical modeling of the instantaneous pressure gradient across the aortic valve.

Aortic stenosis is the most frequent valvular heart disease. The mean systolic value of the transvalvular pressure gradient (TPG) is commonly utilized during clinical examination to evaluate its severity and it can be determined either by cardiac catheterization or by Doppler echocardiography. TPG is highly time-dependent over systole and is known to depend upon the transvalvular flow rate, the effective orifice area (EOA) of the aortic valve and the cross-sectional area of the ascending aorta. However it is still unclear how these parameters modify the TPG waveform. We thus derived a simple analytical model from the energy loss concept to describe the instantaneous TPG across the aortic valve during systole. This theoretical model was validated with orifice plates and bioprosthetic heart valves in an in vitro aortic flow model. Instantaneous TPG was measured by catheter and its waveform was compared with the one determined from the transvalvular flow rate, the valvular EOA and the aortic cross-sectional area, using the derived equation. Our results showed a very good concordance between the measured and predicted instantaneous TPG. The analytical model proposed and validated in this study provides a comprehensive description of the aortic valve hemodynamics that can be used to accurately predict the instantaneous transvalvular pressure gradient in native and bioprosthetic aortic valves. The consideration of this model suggests that: (1) TPG waveform is exclusively dependent upon transvalvular flow rate and flow geometry, (2) the frequently applied simplified Bernoulli equation may overestimate mean TPG by more than 30% and (3) the measurement of ejection time by cardiac catheterization may underestimate the actual ejection time, especially in patients with mild/moderate aortic stenosis and low cardiac output.

Animals↗
PubMed2004

Valve-sparing aortic root replacement in bicuspid aortic valves: a reasonable option?

OBJECTIVES: Aortic dilatation occurs in many patients with bicuspid aortic valves. We have added root replacement using the remodeling technique originally designed for tricuspid aortic valves to bicuspid aortic valve repair for treatment of the dilated root. We compared the results of remodeling in bicuspid aortic valves with those in tricuspid aortic valves. METHODS: From October 1995 through January 2004, 60 patients underwent root remodeling for bicuspid aortic valves (group A), and 130 patients underwent root remodeling for tricuspid aortic valves (group B). Correction of cusp prolapse was more often performed in group A (group A, 50/60; group B, 47/130; P < .0001). Transthoracic echocardiography was performed at 1 week, 6 and 12 months, and every year thereafter. Cumulative follow-up was 527 patient-years (mean, 2.9 +/- 2 years). RESULTS: No patient died in group A. Hospital mortality in group B was 5% (5/100; 95% confidence interval,1.6%-11.3%) after elective operations and 10% (3/30; 95% confidence interval, 2.1%-26.5%) after emergency operations. Mean systolic gradients were identical at 1 year (group A, 4.8 +/- 2.1 mm Hg; group B, 4.0 +/- 2 mm Hg) and 5 years (group A, 4.5 +/- 2.3 mm Hg; group B, 3.9 +/- 2.2 mm Hg). Freedom from aortic regurgitation of grade 2 or higher at 5 years was 96% in group A and 83% in group B ( P = .07), and freedom from reoperation at 5 years was 98% in group A and 98% in group B ( P = .73). CONCLUSIONS: Valve-sparing aortic replacement with root remodeling can be applied to aortic dilatation and a regurgitant bicuspid aortic valve. Hemodynamic function and valve stability of a repaired bicuspid aortic valve are comparable with those seen in cases of tricuspid anatomy.

Actuarial Analysis↗