Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “adenine base editing”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2023

Single-swap editing for the correction of common Duchenne muscular dystrophy mutations.

Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is a fatal X-linked recessive disease of progressive muscle weakness and wasting caused by the absence of dystrophin protein. Current gene therapy approaches using antisense oligonucleotides require lifelong dosing and have limited efficacy in restoring dystrophin production. A gene editing approach could permanently correct the genome and restore dystrophin protein expression. Here, we describe single-swap editing, in which an adenine base editor edits a single base pair at a splice donor site or splice acceptor site to enable exon skipping or reframing. In human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes, we demonstrate that single-swap editing can enable beneficial exon skipping or reframing for the three most therapeutically relevant exons-DMD exons 45, 51, and 53-which could be beneficial for 30% of all DMD patients. Furthermore, an adeno-associated virus delivery method for base editing components can efficiently restore dystrophin production locally and systemically in skeletal and cardiac muscles of a DMD mouse model containing a deletion of Dmd exon 44. Our studies demonstrate single-swap editing as a potential gene editing therapy for common DMD mutations.

AAV↗
PubMed2025

RNA-DNA hybrid binding domain broadens the editing window of base editors.

Adenine base editors (ABEs) and cytosine base editors (CBEs) are prominent tools for precise genome editing but are hindered by limited editing activity at positions proximal to the protospacer adjacent motif (PAM). This study investigates the potential of enhancing base editors editing activity by fusing them with RNA-DNA hybrid binding domains (RHBDs). Specifically, fusing ABE8e with the RHBD of Homo sapiens RNaseH1 (RHBD1) significantly increased A-to-G editing efficiency in the PAM-proximal region (A9-A15) by up to 3.5-fold, while reducing off-target cytosine editing. Additionally, RHBD1 is compatible with ABEmax, BE4max, and dual base editor (eA&C-BEmax), enhancing their editing activity at the PAM-proximal bases. Notably, RHBD1-fused BE4max led to a 3.1-fold improvement in C-to-T editing efficiency at PAM-proximal region (C9-C12). Furthermore, we demonstrated that RHBD1-fused ABE8e could effectively edit disease-related single nucleotide variations (SNVs) in human cells and validated its efficacy in adult mouse liver. These findings highlight the significance of the RHBD in expanding editing window and the applicability of base editors for gene therapy and disease modeling.

Gene Editing↗
PubMed2026

Enhancing CRISPR-Cas12a base editing in plants with LbCas12a variants and introns.

Cytosine base editors (CBEs) and adenine base editors (ABEs) are powerful tools for precise genome editing in plants. Conventionally, such base editors are built upon the CRISPR-Cas9 systems where Cas9 nickases are used. To expand the base editing scope and minimize off-target effects, base editors derived from the CRISPR-Cas12a systems are desired. However, the use of deactivated Cas12a (dCas12a) in such base editors constrains the editing activity, preventing the wide use of Cas12a base editors for plant research and trait development. In this study, we demonstrate the use of an ABE based on the efficient LbCas12a-RRV variant to introduce herbicide-resistant mutations in OsACCase in rice. To improve Cas12a CBEs and ABEs, we inserted introns into the coding sequence of dLbCas12a-RRV. This intron-containing Cas12a-CBE shows substantial improvement in editing efficiency in rice, compared to the intron-less counterparts. By contrast, the improvement of ABE with the intron-containing dLbCas12a-RRV is very limited, partly due to the already high baseline editing efficiency of the intron-less dLbCas12a-RRV ABE. Testing of these base editors in poplar shows elevated C-to-T base editing by dLbCas12a-RRV-intron-CBE. For A-to-G editing, ABEs built upon dLbCas12a-RV and dLbCas12a-RRV variants showed significant improvement over ABEs derived from wild-type LbCas12a and the ttLbCas12a variant. The addition of introns to dLbCas12a-RRV does not further improve the base editing efficiency. With whole genome sequencing in rice, we evaluated genome editing specificities with these improved Cas12a base editors. Our analyses show that both intron-containing Cas12a CBE and ABE barely introduce guide RNA-dependent off-target mutations. However, they can generate guide RNA-independent off-target mutations, which are likely attributed to the high enzymatic activities of the deaminases. Collectively, our study demonstrates the successful use of a Cas12a base editor for trait development and reports improved Cas12a CBEs and ABEs for precise base editing in plants.

Oryza↗
PubMed2026

Advances in CRISPR Base Editing: From Molecular Evolution to Therapeutic Applications in Genomic Medicine.

CRISPR-Cas9 systems revolutionized gene editing, but inherent drawbacks, namely DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) and the difficulty of achieving precise repairs (due to low HDR efficiency), led researchers to invent new, more accurate gene editing tools. Base editing represents a significant leap forward, enabling targeted single-nucleotide conversions directly on the DNA without DSBs or donor templates. The core technology involves fusing catalytically dead or nickase Cas proteins to DNA deaminase enzymes. Cytosine base editors (CBEs) convert C•G to T•A pairs, while adenine base editors (ABEs) change A•T to G•C. These editors exploit the deaminase function within the R-loop structure formed by Cas binding and co-opt endogenous DNA repair mechanisms for precision. While offering improved efficiency and editing precision, base editing faces persistent challenges, such as off-target effects, bystander edits, delivery and ethical concerns. Continuous engineering efforts have refined these tools, enhancing accuracy, expanding targetability and reducing unwanted edits. The base editing arsenal has also broadened to include C-to-G base editors (CGBEs), dual A&C editors and versions targeting organelles. Successful preclinical studies demonstrating the correction of mutations responsible for the disease have paved the way for clinical trials, which are now testing therapies for conditions like sickle cell disease, β-thalassaemia and hypercholesterolemia using various delivery systems. This review explores CRISPR base editing's origins, mechanisms of action, potential therapies and current restrictions, pointing to its broadening impact on medical genetics.

Humans↗
PubMed2025

Genome editing with programmable base editors in human cells.

Genome editing has garnered significant attention over the last decade, resulting in a massive expansion of the genome engineering toolbox. Base editors encompass a class of tools that enable installing single-nucleotide changes in genomic DNA without the use of double-strand breaks. With the ever-increasing development of new and/or improved base editor systems, it is easy to be overwhelmed by the abundance of options. Here, we provide clear guidance to facilitate the selection of a base editor and to design guide RNAs (gRNAs) to suit various needs. Additionally, we describe in detail how to generate gRNA plasmids, transfect various mammalian cell types, and evaluate editing efficiencies. Finally, we give alternative methods and troubleshooting tips for some common pitfalls encountered during base editing.

Humans↗
PubMed2026

Tracking-seq: a universal off-target detection approach for CRISPR-Cas genome editing.

Tracking-seq is a highly sensitive method for genome-wide detection of off-target effects in cells edited with diverse genome editing modalities, including Cas9, cytosine base editors, adenine base editors and prime editors. Since most genome editors induce DNA repair pathways and generate single-stranded DNA (ssDNA) intermediates, Tracking-seq leverages this process by tracking replication protein A-a key protein that binds and protects ssDNA-to identify on-target and off-target events. Here we provide a detailed protocol for Tracking-seq, covering genome editing of cells, extraction of replication protein A-bound ssDNA, sequencing library construction and data analysis using our custom computational tool Offtracker. Tracking-seq is applicable to various genome editing scenarios with low cell input, delivering high-performance results. The entire workflow, from genome editing to data analysis, can be completed within 1-2 weeks, making it a rapid solution for assessing genome-wide off-target activity.

CRISPR-Cas Systems↗
PubMed2026

Base editing reveals an essential role for NANOG in human embryogenesis.

Understanding how the first cell lineages in human development are specified and maintained has fundamental importance and clinical implications for regenerative medicine, infertility and pregnancy loss. Although mouse models have provided valuable insights into transcription factors regulating early development, translating these findings to human embryos has been limited by ethical, technical and biological constraints. Functional studies of transcription factors in human embryos have been hindered by nuclease-based genome editing approaches that induce genotoxicity1-3. Here, to overcome this, we applied ABE8e adenine base editing4,5 to precisely target an exon splice donor site, resulting in a splicing defect and functional knockout of the developmental regulator NANOG in human embryos. This approach did not trigger genotoxicity and showed limited off-target editing. Loss of NANOG disrupts pluripotent epiblast specification and instead cells differentiate towards a primitive endoderm (yolk sac) or trophectoderm (placental) transcriptional programme. Retention of primitive endoderm differentiation in NANOG-edited human embryos reveals a functional compensation that is distinct from mouse, underscoring the importance of directly investigating human development. Our findings demonstrate an essential role for NANOG in human pluripotency and epiblast specification and highlight the utility of base editing for functional interrogation of human development.

Journal Article↗
PubMed2025

Engraftment and persistence of HBB base-edited hematopoietic stem cells in nonhuman primates.

Sickle cell disease (SCD) is caused by a single nucleotide change in the β-globin gene that adenine base editors can convert to the nonpathogenic Makassar β-globin variant. Here, we evaluated the long-term efficiency and off-target editing potential of autologous Makassar base editing in three rhesus macaques as a step toward human translation. Base editing of CD34+CD90+ hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) at the Makassar locus reached greater than 60% efficiency using a bystander nucleotide as a proxy for the sickle cell target in cells from healthy macaques. No impact on myeloid and erythroid colony formation was seen, and clonal analysis revealed that >90% of HSCs were edited, >20% with biallelic editing. After transplantation of autologous gene-edited HSCs, all three macaques rapidly recovered neutrophils, red blood cells, and platelets with stable editing of 25.6%, on average, observed across nucleated blood cells. Similarly, the bone marrow stem cell compartment maintained over 20% of cells harboring mono- or biallelic edits. Off-target editing was assessed at over 900 candidate sites, with editing observed at eight sites, but no selection for or impact of these edits was observed throughout engraftment. These data support further translation of base editing of autologous HSCs for the treatment of patients with SCD.

Animals↗
PubMed2025

Charting the development and engineering of CRISPR base editors: lessons and inspirations.

CRISPR base editors (BEs) have introduced a new chapter in precise genome editing. The brief but fruitful history of BE development documents many case studies that not only lay the foundation of base-editing technology but are also instrumental to future protein engineering efforts. In this review, we summarize the development and engineering of various BEs with a focus on recent progress. These include traditional cytosine and adenine base editors (CBEs and ABEs), novel TadA-derived CBEs, transversion BEs, dual BEs, and CRISPR-free BEs. We discuss each aspect of the workflow and highlight the successes and challenges encountered in the engineering process.

Gene Editing↗
PubMed2026

Advances in the Application of Adenine Base Editor (ABE) in Biology and Medicine: Prospects and Challenges.

Adenine base editors (ABEs), which achieve A·T to G·C conversions in the genome precisely, symbolize a groundbreaking development in genetic engineering across animal, plant, and microbial systems. This review systematically summed up the research progress and current challenges of ABE in medical and biological applications: it outlined the historical context and pivotal milestones of its technological development; it emphasized major therapeutic advances for genetic diseases including spinal muscular atrophy, mitochondrial genetic disorders, and hyperlipidemia; it provided a comprehensive overview of its prospective uses for enhancing genetic traits in agricultural crops, including grains and fruits; this review conducted a multidimensional assessment of ABE performance through systematic comparison with other base editing technologies, comprehensively evaluating both editing efficiency and inherent limitations. It specifically addresses biosecurity risks such as off-target effects and genomic instability. Finally, safety concerns were proposed as the central challenge hindering its clinical translation, although ABE holds immense promise for precision medicine and agricultural breeding. Unlike previous reviews that mainly summarized early ABE development and general applications, this review particularly emphasizes recently engineered ABE systems, translational bottlenecks, delivery strategies, comparative clinical feasibility, and unresolved biosafety challenges that currently limit broader therapeutic and agricultural applications.

Adenine base editors↗
PubMed2026

Optimized TadA-derived base editors efficiently manipulate mRNA splicing by A-to-G and C-to-K editing in potato.

Pre-messenger RNA (pre-mRNA) splicing is a critical mechanism for post-transcriptional regulation in plants. Through alternative splicing, plants produce diverse transcriptomes and proteomes that finely regulate development as well as responses to biotic and abiotic stresses. However, modulating the generation of specific splicing isoforms for functional characterization remains challenging, particularly in the non-model crop potato. Here, we show that two optimized TadA-derived base editors efficiently induce diverse mRNA splice variants by targeting specific splice sites. By evaluating multiple adenosine deaminases and performing multi-dimensional optimization, we developed an efficient adenine base editor RTF-ABE8e for potato. RTF-ABE8e achieved 100% editing efficiency at two StDL1 target sites in stable transgenic potato, with homozygous editing frequencies as high as 93.3% and 91.1%, respectively. We also developed RTF-TadDE, a dual-base editor based on a TadA-derived dual deaminase, for A-to-G and C-to-K (K = T/G) mutations in potato with an overall editing efficiency comparable to that of RTF-ABE8e. By targeting different splice sites with these base editors, we obtained diverse splicing isoforms carrying premature termination codons (PTCs) at StDL1 and StPDS and robust mutant phenotypes. These base editors enable efficient and precise editing of splice sites to trigger missplicing, making them powerful tools for manipulating splicing in plants.

Solanum tuberosum↗
PubMed2026

Base editing rescues a hereditary motor neuron disease in mouse and patient-derived iPSC organoid models.

In hereditary motor neuron diseases (MNDs), including forms of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) caused by single-nucleotide variants, effective therapeutic strategies need to address both gain- and loss-of-function mechanisms. Genome editing-based gene therapy represents a promising approach for simultaneously targeting these mechanisms. To establish proof-of-concept for base editing in a hereditary MND, we targeted the P285L variant in the TRK-fused gene (TFG), which causes hereditary motor and sensory neuropathy with proximal dominant involvement (HMSN-P), a disorder that shares clinical and histopathological features with ALS. We identified the optimal adenine base editor by comparing candidate editors in HMSN-P patient-derived induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs). We then generated a transgenic mouse model expressing human TFG P285L and evaluated the selected editor by subpial delivery of adeno-associated virus (AAV) vectors to the spinal cord. AAV-mediated base editing prolonged survival, preserved motor neurons, and attenuated axon loss in ventral nerve roots. Treatment with the selected base editing vector reduced TFG aggregation and suppressed neuronal death in HMSN-P iPSC-derived neuromuscular organoids. Collectively, these findings support the therapeutic potential of base editing for hereditary MNDs.

AAV↗
PubMed2026

Lipid-nanoparticle-mediated base editing of the trabecular meshwork rescues glaucoma in vivo.

Mutations in MYOC, the most common genetic cause of glaucoma, cause misfolded myocilin to accumulate in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER), leading to trabecular meshwork (TM) dysfunction, elevated intraocular pressure, and progressive vision loss. While gene editing offers curative potential, current delivery methods rely on viral vectors, which are limited by inflammation, off-target effects, and poor translatability. Here, we report a nonviral lipid nanoparticle (LNP) platform that enables selective in vivo delivery of mRNA encoding an adenine base editor and single guide RNA (LNP-ABE) to TM cells. A direct comparison of LNP-mCherry with lentiviral GFP revealed that LNPs outperform viral vectors, achieving markedly higher efficiency and greater selectivity for the TM without inducing ocular inflammation. In a Cre-inducible Tg.CreMYOCY437H glaucoma mouse model, LNP-Cre mRNA selectively induced mutant MYOC expression in the TM, faithfully recapitulating key disease features. A single administration of LNP-ABE achieved efficient on-target editing of mutant MYOC, reducing mutant myocilin protein by approximately 46%, decreasing aggregates, alleviating ER stress, and fully rescuing the glaucomatous phenotype in Tg.CreMYOCY437H mice. Importantly, no off-target editing or ocular toxicity was detected. These findings establish LNP-based mRNA delivery as a safe, efficient, and clinically translatable approach for TM-targeted genome editing with broad therapeutic potential in glaucoma.

Animals↗
PubMed2026

In Vivo Base Editing Partially Rescues Bone Dysplasia in a Mouse Model of Hutchinson-Gilford Progeria Syndrome.

Hutchinson-Gilford progeria syndrome (HGPS) is a premature aging disorder affecting tissues of mesenchymal origin. Most patients harbor a c.1824C>T/p.G608= variant, commonly described as G608G, in exon 11 of LMNA that leads to aberrant splicing and production of the toxic progerin protein. In addition to cardiovascular, dermal, and adipose tissue deterioration, HGPS mouse models also develop progressive bone dysplasia that occurs in patients. Here we characterize the efficacy of in&#xa0;vivo mutation correction with an adenine base editor (ABE) to rescue structural and functional defects in HGPS transgenic murine bone tissue. Treatment of double-copy transgenic osteoblast cultures with a lentiviral-delivered CRISPR-Cas9 ABE achieved nearly 40% gene correction in&#xa0;vitro, resulting in significant reduction of progerin transcripts and protein, in the absence of selective agents. Furthermore, gene correction improved progeroid osteoblasts' capacity to deposit and mineralize extracellular matrix compared to untreated cultures. In&#xa0;vivo, a single intravenous dose of AAV9-delivered ABE corrected the mutation, achieving ~14%, ~22%, ~10% and <&#x2009;1% correction in bone by six months of age when administered at P3, P14, 1 and 4&#x2009;months of age, respectively. Partially rescued bone structural and physical parameters were observed in P14-treated mice with concomitant normalization of gene transcriptional programs and intracellular signaling pathways involved in bone remodeling. This work demonstrates in&#xa0;vivo delivery of a locus-specific DNA base editor to bone tissue, delineates the timing of treatment required for maximum efficacy, and suggests that this system might be tailored for application to other monogenic bone disorders.

Animals↗
PubMed2025

A streamlined base editor engineering strategy to reduce bystander editing.

Base editing (BE) can permanently correct over half of known human pathogenic genetic variants without requiring a repair template, thus serving as a promising therapeutic tool to treat a broad spectrum of genetic diseases. However, the broad activity windows of current base editors pose a major challenge to their therapeutic application. Here, we show that integrating a naturally occurring oligonucleotide binding module into the deaminase active center of TadA-8e, a highly active deoxyadenosine deaminase, enhances its editing specificity. When conjugated with a Cas9 nickase or alternative PAM Cas9 variants, the engineered TadA variant-TadA-NW1-consistently achieves robust A-to-G editing efficiencies within an editing window consisting of four nucleotides, substantially narrower than the 10-bp editing window of the TadA-8e-derived ABEs. Moreover, compared to ABE8e, ABE-NW1 shows significantly decreased Cas9-dependent and -independent off-target activity while maintaining similar on-target editing efficiency. Further, TadA-NW1 can be reprogrammed to perform desired cytidine deamination and adenine transversion within a restricted editing window. Finally, in a cystic fibrosis (CF) cell model, ABE-NW1 outperforms existing ABEs in accurately and efficiently correcting the CFTR W1282X variant, one of the most common CF-causing mutations. In all, we engineered a suite of base editors with refined activity windows, enabling more precise base editing. Importantly, this study presents a streamlined genome editor re-engineering strategy to accelerate the development of therapeutic base editing.

Gene Editing↗
PubMed2025

Translational reading frame determines the pathogenicity of C-terminal frameshift deletions in MeCP2: an alternative therapeutic approach.

Mutations in the MECP2 gene cause the severe neurological disorder Rett syndrome. A cluster of frameshift-causing C-terminal deletions (CTDs) lead to loss of ~100 amino acids at the C-terminus of the MeCP2 protein, and account for approximately 10% of RTT-causing mutations. The pathogenicity of C-terminal deletions (CTDs) is unexpected, as this C-terminal domain is non-essential in mice. Utilising databases of pathogenic and benign human MECP2 mutations, we find that some individuals with apparently typical CTDs do not exhibit Rett syndrome, confirming that C-terminal truncations are not intrinsically pathogenic. Using human DNA sequence data and mouse models, we demonstrate that pathogenicity results from a drastic reduction in MeCP2 levels and is determined by the presence of the short amino acid motif proline-proline-stop (-PPX) at the C-terminus, which results from a shift to the +2 reading frame. Individuals with CTDs that shift to the +1 frame avoid this motif and do not develop Rett syndrome. Mutating the stop codon of the PPX motif to tryptophan rescues MeCP2 expression and RTT-like phenotypes in a CTD mouse model. Finally, we demonstrate that an adenine base editor can efficiently introduce this tryptophan substitution in cultured cells. Overall, our findings uncover a simple and reliable prognostic distinction between benign and pathogenic CTDs and provide proof-of-concept for an editing strategy that potentially corrects all disease-causing CTD mutations.

Journal Article↗
PubMed2025

Design Rules for Expanding PAM Compatibility in CRISPR-Cas9 from the VQR, VRER and EQR variants.

Expanding the range of Protospacer Adjacent Motifs (PAMs) recognized by CRISPR-Cas9 is essential for broadening genome-editing applications. Here, we combine molecular dynamics simulations with graph-theory and centrality analyses to dissect the principles of PAM recognition in three Cas9 variants - VQR, VRER, and EQR - that target non-canonical PAMs. We show that efficient recognition is not dictated solely by direct contacts between PAM-interacting residues and DNA, but also by a distal network that stabilizes the PAM-binding domain and preserves long-range communication with REC3, a hub that relays signals to the HNH nuclease. A key role emerges for the D1135V/E substitution, which enables stable DNA binding by K1107 and preserves key DNA phosphate locking interactions via S1109, securing stable PAM engagement. In contrast, variants carrying only R-to-Q substitutions at PAM-contacting residues, though predicted to enhance adenine recognition, destabilize the PAM-binding cleft, perturb REC3 dynamics, and disrupt allosteric coupling to HNH. Together, these findings establish that PAM recognition requires local stabilization, distal coupling, and entropic tuning, rather than a simple consequence of base-specific contacts. This framework provides guiding principles for engineering Cas9 variants with expanded PAM compatibility and improved editing efficiency.

Journal Article↗