Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Zoledronic Acid”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Zoledronic acid.

Zoledronic acid (zoledronate) is a new generation bisphosphonate that inhibits osteoclast bone resorption. It was much more potent than other bisphosphonates at inhibiting 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3-induced hypercalcaemia in a rat model and calcium release in vitro. A single 5-minute intravenous infusion of zoledronic acid (4 or 8 mg) was significantly more effective than a 2-hour infusion of pamidronic acid (pamidronic acid disodium, pamidronate disodium) [90 mg] in normalising serum calcium levels in patients with hypercalcaemia of malignancy and resulted in a significantly longer median time to relapse (pooled analysis from 2 randomised, double-blind, parallel-group trials). There were no differences in tolerability between zoledronic acid and pamidronic acid in comparative trials; the most common events in pivotal trials were fever, anaemia, nausea, constipation and dyspnoea. Fever, hypophosphataemia and hypocalcaemia were the most common events in a small phase I trial.

Animals↗

p53-independent anti-tumor effects of the nitrogen-containing bisphosphonate zoledronic acid.

Zoledronic acid (ZOL), a nitrogen-containing bisphosphonate, exerts anti-tumor effects by inhibiting the prenylation of small GTPases. We have also reported that ZOL shows an anti-leukemic effect by inducing apoptosis throughout the S phase to the G(2) / M boundary. Here, we studied the effects of ZOL on various cell cycle regulators, including p53, cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs), CDK inhibitors and cyclins, using BV173 leukemia and HCT116 colorectal carcinoma cell lines, harboring wild-type (wt-) p53. ZOL induced the accumulation of neither p53 nor p21(WAF1/CIP1) during the execution of apoptosis in BV173 cells. Therefore, we investigated the dependence of ZOL-induced apoptosis on intact p53 by using wt-p53 HCT116 and a p53-degraded HCT116 subline, and observed no significant difference. p57(KIP2) was upregulated by ZOL in BV173 cells, but not in HCT116 cells. Flow cytometric analyses showed that ZOL also impaired the cell cycle-dependent expression patterns of cyclins A, B and D3 in BV173. In conclusion, the p53-independent anti-tumor activities of ZOL suggest that it may be an attractive agent for treating cancers, including those with chemoresistance resulting from the loss of p53 function. ZOL also affected the coordinate expression patterns of several cell cycle regulators during the execution of anti-tumor activity.

Antineoplastic Agents↗

Comparison of Fc-osteoprotegerin and zoledronic acid activities suggests that zoledronic acid inhibits prostate cancer in bone by indirect mechanisms.

Zoledronic acid (ZA) has been shown to inhibit prostate tumor growth in vitro and have beneficial effects in patients with advanced prostate cancer (CaP). The aim of this study was to determine whether ZA exhibits direct anti-tumor effects on CaP cells in vivo. To distinguish the effects of inhibition of osteolysis and direct anti-tumor activity of ZA in vivo, we compared the results of treatment with ZA and osteoprotegerin (Fc-OPG), which inhibits osteolysis, but without significant direct anti-tumor effects. In vitro Fc-OPG had no significant effects on C4-2 proliferation, whereas ZA decreased proliferation. However, both agents decreased tumor growth in bone. Moreover, both increased bone volume and prevented the overall decreases in BMD associated with growth of C4-2 cells in bone. Our study provides novel and significant observations that the in vivo effects of ZA are consistent with indirect effects mediated by osteoclasts.

Animals↗

Zoledronic acid versus placebo in the treatment of skeletal metastases in patients with lung cancer and other solid tumors: a phase III, double-blind, randomized trial--the Zoledronic Acid Lung Cancer and Other Solid Tumors Study Group.

PURPOSE: To assess the efficacy and safety of zoledronic acid in patients with bone metastases secondary to solid tumors other than breast or prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned to receive zoledronic acid (4 or 8 mg) or placebo every 3 weeks for 9 months, with concomitant antineoplastic therapy. The 8-mg dose was reduced to 4 mg (8/4-mg group). The primary efficacy analysis was proportion of patients with at least one skeletal-related event (SRE), defined as pathologic fracture, spinal cord compression, radiation therapy to bone, and surgery to bone. Secondary analyses (time to first SRE, skeletal morbidity rate, and multiple event analysis) counted hypercalcemia as an SRE. RESULTS: Among 773 patients with bone metastases from lung cancer or other solid tumors, the proportion with an SRE was reduced in both zoledronic acid groups compared with the placebo group (38% for 4 mg and 35% for 8/4 mg zoledronic acid v 44% for the placebo group; P =.127 and P =.023 for 4-mg and 8/4-mg groups, respectively). Additionally, 4 mg zoledronic acid significantly increased time to first event (median, 230 v 163 days for placebo; P =.023), an important end point in this poor-prognosis population, and significantly reduced the risk of developing skeletal events by multiple event analysis (hazard ratio = 0.732; P =.017). Zoledronic acid was well tolerated; the most common adverse events in all treatment groups included bone pain, nausea, anemia, and vomiting. CONCLUSION: Zoledronic acid (4 mg infused over 15 minutes) is the first bisphosphonate to reduce skeletal complications in patients with bone metastases from solid tumors other than breast and prostate cancer.

Bone Neoplasms↗

Zoledronic acid: a new parenteral bisphosphonate.

BACKGROUND: Inhibition of bone resorption using bisphosphonates is an important step in palliation of complications of advanced cancer, such as hypercalcemia and metastatic bone disease. OBJECTIVE: The goal of this article was to describe the pharmacologic properties of zoledronic acid (zoledronate) and discuss findings from preclinical and clinical studies of its use in skeletal disorders. METHODS: Relevant English-language literature was identified using the terms zoledronic acid, zoledronate, Zometa, and 118072-93-8 through searches of MEDLINE (1966-June 2003) and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts (1970-June 2003), and abstract proceedings from the American Society of Clinical Oncology (1997-2002). RESULTS: Zoledronic acid is a nitrogen-containing bisphosphonate that inhibits bone resorption. It is indicated for the treatment of hypercalcemia of malignancy and for the treatment of patients with multiple myeloma or documented metastasis from solid tumors, in conjunction with standard antineoplastic therapy. The recommended dosage is 4 mg via IV over >or= 15 minutes every 3 or 4 weeks. Compared with pamidronate 90 mg, zoledronic acid 4 and 8 mg provided a higher complete response rate for hypercalcemia of malignancy by day 10 (88.4% and 86.7% vs 69.7%; P = 0.002 and P = 0.015) and longer duration of action (median time to relapse, 30 and 40 days vs 17 days; P = 0.001 and P = 0.007). In patients with breast cancer or multiple myeloma, zoledronic acid was as effective as pamidronate in delaying time to a first skeletal-related event (373 days vs 363 days). In patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer and bone metastases, zoledronic acid 4 mg reduced the proportion of patients who experienced a skeletal-related event (33% vs 44% with placebo; P = 0.021) or a skeletal fracture (13% vs 22% with placebo; P = 0.015). In patients with bone metastases from solid tumors, zoledronic acid delayed the median time to a first skeletal-related event (230 days vs 163 days with placebo; P = 0.023). Common adverse events include fever, nausea, constipation, fatigue, and bone pain. CONCLUSION: Zoledronic acid is an effective and generally well-tolerated treatment for hypercalcemia of malignancy and skeletal complications of metastatic bone disease.

Animals↗

Zoledronic acid: a review of its use in patients with advanced cancer.

Zoledronic acid (Zometa), a parenteral bisphosphonate, is an inhibitor of osteoclast-mediated bone resorption and is used in the management of patients with cancer. Zoledronic acid 4 mg is administered as an intravenous infusion over 15 minutes. In the treatment of bone metastases, zoledronic acid is the first and only bisphosphonate to demonstrate efficacy in patients with a broad range of tumour types and in multiple myeloma. In well-designed trials, a single 4 mg dose of zoledronic acid showed good efficacy in the treatment of patients with hypercalcaemia of malignancy. Zoledronic acid 4 mg was superior to pamidronic acid 90 mg, administered as a 2-hour infusion, as assessed by normalised serum calcium concentrations 10 days after administration. In conjunction with antineoplastic therapy, zoledronic acid was an effective long-term (up to 25 months) treatment for skeletal-related events in patients with bone metastases associated with multiple myeloma or solid tumours. In patients with bone metastases secondary to breast cancer or bone lesions from myeloma, zoledronic acid was at least as effective as pamidronic acid, based on assessments of skeletal-related events 25 months after the start of treatment. In addition, compared with pamidronic acid, the overall risk of developing skeletal complications, including hypercalcaemia of malignancy, was significantly reduced in recipients of zoledronic acid. Compared with pamidronic acid, zoledronic acid reduced the risk of patients with breast cancer developing a skeletal-related event by an additional 20%. Zoledronic acid was significantly more effective than placebo on most efficacy measures in patients with bone metastases secondary to other solid tumours (e.g. lung, prostate) and showed sustained efficacy for up to 15 months. Preliminary data indicate that its efficacy in these patients is sustained for up to 24 months. Estimates of the cost effectiveness of zoledronic acid in the treatment of prostate cancer were consistent with those of other bisphosphonates, and cost-effectiveness ratios were within limits considered acceptable economic value. Zoledronic acid was generally well tolerated, with a tolerability profile similar to that of pamidronic acid and placebo. As with other bisphosphonates, deterioration of renal function has occasionally been reported in patients receiving zoledronic acid and monitoring of serum creatinine is recommended during treatment. The efficacy of zoledronic acid is therefore well established in patients with hypercalcaemia of malignancy and, for up to 25 months, in the treatment of complications arising from metastatic bone disease in patients with multiple myeloma or solid tumours. The clinical profile of zoledronic acid compares favourably with that of pamidronic acid in patients with cancer and zoledronic acid has a more convenient administration schedule with the potential for better compliance. Thus, zoledronic acid is an effective bisphosphonate and is positioned to play an important role in the management of advanced cancer patients with bone metastases.

Area Under Curve↗

Zoledronic acid inhibits primary bone tumor growth in Ewing sarcoma.

BACKGROUND: Zoledronic acid has been shown to be effective in the treatment of osteoporosis, hypercalcemia, and metastatic bone tumors. The efficacy of zoledronic acid on primary bone tumors has not been investigated. METHODS: A primary bone tumor mouse model was established. Intratibia injection of TC71 cells resulted in an osteolytic bone tumor. Four days after injection the mice were treated with zoledronic acid alone, paclitaxel alone, or zoledronic acid plus paclitaxel. Control mice were treated with phosphate-buffered saline. Bone tumor growth was assessed using a Faxitron Specimen Radiography System. The gene expression was detected by reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), ELISA, and immunohistochemistry. Osteoclast formation was determined by tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase (TRAP) staining. RESULTS: Zoledronic acid induced apoptosis in TC71 human Ewing sarcoma cells and inhibited cell proliferation. Five weeks after injection, 89% of mice in the control group developed osteolytic bone tumors. Paclitaxel had little effect on bone tumor growth, with 78% of mice developing tumors. By contrast, 44% of mice treated with zoledronic acid developed bone tumors. The most effective treatment was zoledronic acid plus paclitaxel. Tumor incidence in the combination therapy group was only 22%. Osteoclasts were quantified using TRAP staining. There was a decrease in TRAP-positive osteoclasts in tumor tissues from zoledronic acid-treated animals compared to control animals. RT-PCR, immunohistochemistry, and ELISA assay demonstrated that zoledronic acid up-regulated osteoprotegerin expression. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that zoledronic acid induces apoptosis and inhibits primary bone tumor growth in Ewing sarcoma through a mechanism involving the up-regulation of osteoprotegerin. Zoledronic acid may provide a novel therapeutic approach for the treatment of patients with Ewing sarcoma.

Animals↗

Zoledronic acid (Zometa) use in bone disease.

Zoledronic acid (Zometa) is the most recent addition to the clinically available bisphosphonates. Clinical benefits in metabolic, as well as cancer-related bone disease have been observed. In addition to its profound antiosteoclast effects, it has demonstrated anticancer effects in preclinical models. Zoledronic acid has been evaluated in randomized, double-blind clinical trials of osteoporosis, Paget's disease of bone, and metastatic, osteolytic and osteoblastic bone disease. Antiosteoclast activity has been demonstrated by reductions in the bone breakdown products N-telopeptide, C-telopeptide and deoxypyridinoline. Bone mineral density, measured by dual energy x-ray absorptometry, is increased with administration of zoledronic acid in postmenopausal osteoporosis. Clinical benefit in cancer includes improvement in bone pain, reductions in skeletal events and delay in time-to-first-skeletal-events. These zoledronic acid treatment benefits have been demonstrated in patients with multiple myeloma, breast, prostate and lung cancer, and other solid tumors.

Bone Diseases↗

Unilateral anterior uveitis complicating zoledronic acid therapy in breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Zoledronic acid is very widely used in patients with metastatic bone disease and osteoporosis. Only one case of bilateral uveitis was recently reported related to its use. CASE PRESENTATION: We report the first case of severe unilateral anterior uveitis in a patient with breast cancer and an intraocular lens. Following zoledronic acid infusion, the patient developed severe and dramatic right eye pain with decreased visual acuity within 24 hours and was found to have a fibrinous anterior uveitis of moderate severity The patient was treated with topical prednisone and atropine eyedrops and recovered slowly over several months. CONCLUSION: Internists, oncologists, endocrinologists, and ophtalmologists should be aware of uveitis as a possible complication of zoledronic acid therapy. Patients should be instructed to report immediately to their physicians and treatment with topical prednisone and atropine eyedrops should be instituted immediately at the onset of symptoms. This report documents anterior uveitis as a complication of zoledronic acid therapy. This reaction could be an idiosyncratic one but further research may shed more light on the etiology.

Bone Density Conservation Agents↗

Zoledronic acid: a review of its use in the management of bone metastases and hypercalcaemia of malignancy.

UNLABELLED: Zoledronic acid (Zometa) is an effective inhibitor of osteoclast-mediated bone resorption. Zoledronic acid demonstrated efficacy in the reduction of skeletalrelated events (SREs) in patients with multiple myeloma or bone metastases secondary to breast cancer, prostate cancer or other solid tumours, or hypercalcaemia of malignancy. Zoledronic acid was effective in patients with multiple myeloma or metastatic breast cancer with osteolytic or mixed bone lesions. The proportion of patients who experienced an SRE was similar during 12 months of treatment with zoledronic acid 4mg or pamidronic acid 90mg, but significantly fewer patients receiving zoledronic acid required radiotherapy to bone. Furthermore, in patients with breast cancer and osteolytic lesions, median time to a first SRE was more than 4 months longer with zoledronic acid than with pamidronic acid. In the multiple event analysis in a 12-month extension study (total study duration was 25 months) in patients with breast cancer, zoledronic acid was superior to pamidronic acid, with an 18% reduction in the risk of experiencing an SRE. Both drugs were associated with a slight reduction in pain. Zoledronic acid 4mg, compared with placebo, significantly reduced the proportion of patients with prostate cancer bone metastases experiencing an SRE, particularly pathological fractures after 15 months' treatment. The drug also significantly delayed the onset of skeletal complications compared with placebo in patients with prostate cancer and other solid tumours including non-small cell lung cancer. When administered as a single 15-minute intravenous infusion, zoledronic acid 4mg was significantly more effective than pamidronic acid administered as a 2-hour infusion in the treatment of severe hypercalcaemia of malignancy, as assessed by complete responses measuring normalised serum calcium concentrations at day 10 after a single dose. Furthermore, zoledronic acid normalised serum calcium concentrations significantly faster than pamidronic acid, and the duration of response and median time to relapse were approximately twice as long in zoledronic acid recipients than in pamidronic acid recipients. Zoledronic acid is well tolerated and has a similar tolerability profile to pamidronic acid. The most commonly reported adverse events included flu-like symptoms (fever, arthralgias, myalgias and bone pain), fatigue, gastrointestinal reactions, anaemia, weakness, dyspnoea and oedema. CONCLUSION: In conjunction with antitumour therapy, zoledronic acid should be considered for routine use to reduce skeletal complications in patients with advanced malignancies involving bone. In patients with hypercalcaemia of malignancy, zoledronic acid is expected to become the treatment of choice.

Antineoplastic Agents↗

Combined effects of zoledronic acid and doxorubicin on breast cancer cell invasion in vitro.

The bisphosphonate zoledronic acid and the cytotoxic drug doxorubicin induce synergistic levels of apoptosis in breast cancer cells. As zoledronic acid and doxorubicin have been shown to reduce cell invasion and migration, we have investigated if these drugs also act synergistically on breast cancer invasion in vitro. MCF7 cells were treated with 0.05 microM doxorubicin/4 h followed by 1 or 10 microM zoledronic acid/24 h (or the reverse sequence). To study invasion, MCF7 cells were either grown on Transwell membranes coated with Matrigel or in a 24-well plate. Cells were treated sequentially using the above drug combinations, prior to starting the invasion assays for 48 h. Cell growth and death were also assessed under the same conditions. We found that invasion of MCF7 cells treated with zoledronic acid and doxorubicin was significantly reduced when compared with control, but the effect was dependent on drug sequence. At 1 microM, zoledronic acid significantly reduced invasion only if cells were pre-treated with doxorubicin, but cell growth was unaffected. For 10 microM zoledronic acid, invasion was reduced when administered before or after the doxorubicin, but this dose of zoledronic acid caused a significant reduction in MCF7 growth. Apoptosis was not induced by any of the drug doses and combinations. We conclude that pre-treatment with 0.05 microM doxorubicin followed by 1 microM zoledronic acid reduces invasion when cells were grown on Matrigel. For 10 microM zoledronic acid, pre- or post-doxorubicin also reduces invasion, but for this combination inhibition of cell growth may contribute to the reduction in invasion observed.

Antibiotics, Antineoplastic↗

Effect of zoledronic acid on pain associated with bone metastasis in patients with prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND: Zoledronic acid reduces skeletal-related events associated with prostate cancer and has long-term efficacy in pain outcomes. Findings of treatment group differences in pain early in treatment are less reliable. We used a recently recommended analytic approach to examine the effect of zoledronic acid on pain. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a trial of zoledronic acid (n = 214) versus placebo (n = 208), we used the Brief Pain Inventory to assess pain at baseline, 3 weeks, 6 weeks and every 6 weeks thereafter for a total of 60 weeks. We used a modified longitudinal rank test to determine whether clinically meaningful changes in pain were related to treatment group. RESULTS: Seventy-six of 214 patients (35.5%) receiving zoledronic acid and 62 of 208 patients (29.8%) receiving placebo completed the 60-week visit (P = 0.22). In all 11 pain assessments, patients receiving zoledronic acid reported more favorable, clinically meaningful changes in pain scores. Overall, patients receiving zoledronic acid had a 33% chance of a favorable response, compared with 25% for patients receiving placebo (P = 0.04; 95% CI 0.5% to 15.6%). CONCLUSIONS: Zoledronic acid was more likely than placebo to be associated with clinically meaningful reductions in pain. Thus, zoledronic acid may help to avert the pain experienced by patients with progressing metastatic disease secondary to prostate cancer.

Aged↗

Zoledronic acid in cancer patients with bone metastases: results of Phase I and II trials.

Zoledronic acid (Zometa, Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp, East Hanover, NJ) is a new, highly potent bisphosphonate that may provide improved management of skeletal complications in cancer patients with bone metastases. A total of 383 cancer patients with osteolytic bone lesions was evaluated in two phase I studies and one phase II study of zoledronic acid. The phase I studies used two dosing regimens, either a 5-minute monthly intravenous infusion of 0.1 to 8 mg administered for 3 or more months or a single 30 to 60 second intravenous bolus of 1 to 16 mg. Zoledronic acid was well tolerated in the two phase I studies and a maximum tolerated dose was not reached in either study. A dose-dependent decrease in urinary markers of bone resorption was observed with the monthly 5-minute infusion. A single intravenous bolus of doses ranging from 2 to 16 mg zoledronic acid suppressed biochemical markers of bone resorption for up to 8 weeks. The phase II study evaluated a 5-minute infusion of 0.4, 2, or 4 mg zoledronic acid and a 2-hour infusion of 90 mg pamidronate in 280 patients with bone metastases and multiple myeloma or breast cancer. Significantly fewer patients receiving the 2 and 4 mg doses of zoledronic acid or 90 mg pamidronate required radiation therapy to bone than those patients receiving a 0.4 mg dose of zoledronic acid. Only 30% to 35% of patients in the 2 and 4 mg zoledronic acid groups or in the pamidronate group experienced any skeletal related event compared with 46% in the 0.4 mg zoledronic acid group. Adverse events consistent with an acute phase reaction were observed with both bisphosphonates. No new, unexpected adverse events were observed with this novel bisphosphonate. These studies support the further evaluation of zoledronic acid in cancer patients with osteolytic metastases. Doses of 0.4 mg or less are ineffective, while rapid infusion of more than 8 mg may increase the risk of renal dysfunction. A 4 mg dose given as a brief infusion appears to offer an excellent benefit/risk ratio for further evaluation in phase III trials.

Bone Neoplasms↗

Differential inhibition of invasion and proliferation by bisphosphonates: anti-metastatic potential of Zoledronic acid in prostate cancer.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the mode of action of Zoledronic acid in the inhibition of metastasis in prostate cancer and the reduction of prostate cancer bone metastases. METHODS: Benign and malignant primary prostatic epithelial cells (PEC) and the PC-3 prostate cancer cell line were studied in co-culture using human bone marrow stroma in the presence of escalating doses of EDTA, Clodronate, Pamidronate and Zoledronic acid. PEC binding and colony growth in bone marrow stroma was measured using standardised quantitative techniques. PEC cellular invasion through Matrigel and an endothelial monolayer was measured either in invasion chambers or by the measurement of endothelial monolayer permeability to fluorescent dextran. Co-culture supernatants were assayed for specific cytokine levels. Bone marrow cellular toxicity was assessed using a standard Mix assay. RESULTS: Treatment of PEC with up to 100 microM bisphosphonate did not affect their ability to bind to bone marrow endothelium or stroma. Bone marrow endothelial permeability was reduced by 100 microM Zoledronic acid by 3.8% (p = 0.03856). Both Pamidronate (40% at 100 microM, p < or = 0.05) and Zoledronic acid inhibited PEC invasion, with Zoledronic acid being the most potent (40% at 10 microM, p < or = 0.05 rising to 91% at 100 microM, p < or = 0.001). Zoledronic acid inhibits malignant PEC proliferation in bone marrow stroma co-culture (26.5% at 10 microM rising to 66.5% at 40 microM). This was accompanied by changes within the cytokine milieu with a >800% rise in TIMP-2. CONCLUSION: Zoledronic acid is a potent inhibitor of PEC invasion across bone marrow endothelium and colony formation with the bone marrow stroma, affecting the MMP: TIMP-2 balance to favour MMP inhibition.

Antineoplastic Agents↗

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of zoledronic acid in cancer patients with bone metastases.

The pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and safety of zoledronic acid (Zometa), a new-generation bisphosphonate, were evaluated in 36 patients with cancer and bone metastases. Zoledronic acid (by specific radioimmunoassay) and markers of bone turnover were determined in plasma and urine after three consecutive infusions (qx28 days) of 4 mg/5 min (n = 5),4 mg/l5 min (n = 7),8 mg/15 min (n = 12), or 16 mg/15 min (n = 12). Zoledronic plasma disposition was multiphasic, with half-lives of 0.2 and 1.4 hours representing an early, rapid decline of concentrations from the end-of-infusion C(max) to < 1% of C(max) at 24 hours postdose and half-lives of 39 and 4526 hours describing subsequent phases of very low concentrations between days 2 and 28 postdose. AUC0-24 h and C(max) were dose proportional and showed little accumulation (AUC0-24 h ratio between the third and first dose was 1.28). Prolonging the infusion from 5 to 15 minutes lowered C(max) by 34%, with no effect on AUC0-24 h. Urinary excretion of zoledronic acid was independent of infusion duration, dose, or number of doses, showing average Ae0-24 h of 38% +/- 13%, 41% +/- 14%, and 37% +/- 17%, respectively, after 4, 8, and 16 mg. Only trace amounts of drug were detectable in post 24-hour urines. Renal clearance (Ae0-24 h)/(AUC0-24 h) was on average 69 +/- 28,81 +/- 40, and 54 +/- 34 ml/min after 4,8, and 16 mg, respectively, and showed a moderate correlation (r = 0.5; p < 0.001) with creatinine clearance, which was 84 +/- 23, 82 +/- 25, and 80 +/- 40 ml/min for the dose groups at baseline. Adverse events and changes from baseline in vital signs and clinical laboratory variables showed no relationship in terms of type, frequency, or severity with zoledronic acid dose or pharmacokinetic parameters. Zoledronic acid produced significant declines from baseline in serum and/or creatinine-corrected urine C-telopeptide (by 74%), N-telopeptide (69%), pyridinium cross-links [19-33%), and calcium (62%), with an increasing trend (by 12%) in bone alkalinephosphatase. There was no relationship of the magnitude and duration of these changes with zoledronic acid dose, Ae0-24 h, AUC0-24 h or C(max). The antiresorptive effects were evident within 1 day postdose and were maintained over 28 days across all dose levels, supporting monthly dosing with 4 mg zoledronic acid.

Adult↗

Impact of zoledronic acid on renal function in patients with cancer: Clinical significance and development of a predictive model.

Zoledronic acid is a potent bisphosphonate licensed for the treatment of myeloma and bone metastases from solid tumors. Renal deterioration is the most significant toxicity associated with zoledronic acid. We attempted to define the incidence and clinical significance of renal deterioration in patients receiving zoledronic acid and to develop a risk-factor profile for this treatment sequela. This study is a retrospective analysis of all patients who received zoledronic acid at Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pa, between 1/10/02 and 1/30/04. Data recorded included patient demographics, tumor characteristics, comorbid illnesses, concomitant medications, cancer therapy, number of zoledronic acid doses administered, and serial creatinine measurements. In total, 3,115 evaluable doses of zoledronic acid were administered to 446 patients (median, 4 doses; mean, 6.98 doses; range, 1-28 doses) at a dose of 4 mg over 15 minutes every 3-4 weeks. Of these 446 patients, 42 experienced renal deterioration (median rise in creatinine level, 1.0 mg/dL; range, 0.5-4.4 mg/dL), requiring discontinuation of zoledronic acid therapy in 8 cases. No patient required dialysis and no patient died as a result of zoledronic acid-induced renal dysfunction. On multivariable analysis, predictive factors for the development of renal deterioration were patient age, a diagnosis of myeloma or renal cell cancer, cumulative number of doses, concomitant therapy with a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug, and current or prior therapy with cisplatin. Using these factors, we constructed a predictive model with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.75. The incidence of clinically significant renal deterioration in patients treated with zoledronic acid is low.We present a predictive model for decision support when estimating this risk.

Acute Kidney Injury↗

The use of zoledronic acid in the management of metastatic bone disease and hypercalcaemia.

Zoledronic acid is a potent, third generation, nitrogen-containing bisphosphonate, licensed for the management of skeletal metastases and hypercalcaemia of malignancy, both of which cause considerable morbidity. In the preclinical setting, zoledronic acid has demonstrated superior potency regarding inhibition of osteolysis and reduction of hypercalcaemia as compared with other bisphosphonates. Clinical trials have indicated that zoledronic acid is superior to pamidronate in suppressing osteolysis and in reducing hypercalcaemia of malignancy. Its main mechanism of action is induction of osteoclast apoptosis through inhibition of the mevalonate pathway. Zoledronic acid has also demonstrated direct anti-tumour activity both in vitro and in animal models, suggesting it may be of benefit in preventing the formation of bone metastases. Clinical trials are in progress, assessing the benefit of zoledronic acid in the adjuvant setting in both breast and prostate cancer.

Bone Neoplasms↗

A randomized, placebo-controlled trial of zoledronic acid in patients with hormone-refractory metastatic prostate carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Bone metastases are a common cause of morbidity in patients with prostate carcinoma. We studied the effect of a new bisphosphonate, zoledronic acid, which blocks bone destruction, on skeletal complications in prostate cancer patients with bone metastases. METHODS: Patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer and a history of bone metastases were randomly assigned to a double-blind treatment regimen of intravenous zoledronic acid at 4 mg (N = 214), zoledronic acid at 8 mg (subsequently reduced to 4 mg; 8/4) (N = 221), or placebo (N = 208) every 3 weeks for 15 months. Proportions of patients with skeletal-related events, time to the first skeletal-related event, skeletal morbidity rate, pain and analgesic scores, disease progression, and safety were assessed. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: Approximately 38% of patients who received zoledronic acid at 4 mg, 28% who received zoledronic acid at 8/4 mg, and 31% who received placebo completed the study. A greater proportion of patients who received placebo had skeletal-related events than those who received zoledronic acid at 4 mg (44.2% versus 33.2%; difference = -11.0%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = -20.3% to -1.8%; P =.021) or those who received zoledronic acid at 8/4 mg (38.5%; difference versus placebo = -5.8%, 95% CI = -15.1% to 3.6%; P =.222). Median time to first skeletal-related event was 321 days for patients who received placebo, was not reached for patients who received zoledronic acid at 4 mg (P =.011 versus placebo), and was 363 days for those who received zoledronic acid at 8/4 mg (P =.491 versus placebo). Compared with urinary markers in patients who received placebo, urinary markers of bone resorption were statistically significantly decreased in patients who received zoledronic acid at either dose (P =.001). Pain and analgesic scores increased more in patients who received placebo than in patients who received zoledronic acid, but there were no differences in disease progression, performance status, or quality-of-life scores among the groups. Zoledronic acid at 4 mg given as a 15-minute infusion was well tolerated, but the 8-mg dose was associated with renal function deterioration. CONCLUSION: Zoledronic acid at 4 mg reduced skeletal-related events in prostate cancer patients with bone metastases.

Adenocarcinoma↗