Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Xamoterol”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1990

The effect of oral dosing of xamoterol on systolic time intervals in man and xamoterol plasma concentrations in heart failure patients.

1. Six healthy male human volunteers of mean age 30.8 years (range 23-37) were given single oral doses of xamoterol (20, 50, 100 or 250 mg) and placebo with a 1 week interval between each dose. Xamoterol produced a significant decrease in systolic time intervals (QS2I, LVETI and PEPI) and a significant increase in systolic blood pressure indicating a positive inotropic effect on the heart at rest. The changes in QS2I were dose-related. Maximum decreases in QS2I were noted 1 to 2 h after dosing and were achieved with a dose of 100 mg. 2. In a second study, oral administration of xamoterol at 3 doses (100, 200 or 300 mg) and placebo were studied in 12 patients of mean age 60.4 years (range 52-73) with mild to moderate heart failure. Each dose was given twice daily for 7 days in a random order. Each dose of xamoterol produced a significant decrease in systolic time intervals indicating a positive inotropic effect on the heart at rest in patients with heart failure. It was not possible to distinguish between the effects of the three doses of xamoterol. 3. In heart failure patients, peak plasma concentrations of xamoterol occurred 1 to 2 h after dosing at all dosage levels and there was a linear relationship between dose and plasma concentration. 4. In both studies xamoterol was well tolerated and only minor adverse experiences were reported. 5. We conclude that, at rest, xamoterol has a positive inotropic effect on the heart when given orally to healthy volunteers or patients with mild to moderate heart failure.

Adult↗
PubMed1989

Clinical efficacy of xamoterol, a beta 1-adrenoceptor partial agonist, in mild to moderate heart failure. U.K. Xamoterol Study Group.

The clinical efficacy of xamoterol, alpha beta 1-adrenoceptor partial agonist, was determined in a multicentre double-blind, randomized, parallel group study of 240 patients with mild to moderate heart failure. At entry, 62% of patients were receiving diuretics (thiazides, or loop diuretics at a dose no greater than the equivalent of 80 mg of frusemide); 32% were taking nitrate formulations and 14% digoxin for control of atrial fibrillation. Assessments were carried out after a 1-week placebo run-in and after 3 months of treatment with either xamoterol or placebo. 198 patients completed the study of whom 186 had valid exercise tests. Mean exercise duration increased by 7% after placebo and by 19% after xamoterol during a progressive treadmill exercise protocol. Xamoterol significantly reduced peak exercise heart rate compared with placebo. Subjectively, there was improvement in breathlessness on the visual analogue scale after treatment with xamoterol compared with placebo, but no change in fatigue. We conclude that xamoterol produces sustained improvement in symptoms and exercise duration in mild to moderate heart failure.

Adrenergic beta-Agonists↗
PubMed1990

Comparative effects of xamoterol and digoxin in patients with mild to moderate heart failure. The Italian Xamoterol Multicenter Research Group.

Xamoterol, 200 mg b.d. was compared with digoxin 0.125 mg b.d. or t.d. in a 3-month double-blind trial in 178 patients with mild to moderate heart failure. Xamoterol and digoxin both significantly increased exercise duration, but greater changes were observed with xamoterol. Xamoterol also improved quality of life to a greater degree than digoxin, and was better tolerated.

Adrenergic beta-Agonists↗
PubMed1996

Effects of beta receptor antagonists on left ventricular function in patients with clinical evidence of heart failure after myocardial infarction. A double-blind comparison of metoprolol and xamoterol. Echocardiographic results from the Metoprolol and Xamoterol Infarction Study (MEXIS).

Two hundred and ten patients with clinical evidence of heart failure, developing after an acute myocardial infarction, were randomized to treatment with the beta 1-receptor antagonist metoprolol 50-100 mg b.i.d. (n = 106) or the beta 1-receptor partial agonist xamoterol 100-200 mg b.i.d. (n = 104). Left ventricular systolic and diastolic function were assessed with echocardiography and transmitral Doppler cardiography before and after 3 and 12 months of double-blind treatment. E-point septal separation and percent left ventricular fractional shortening were used as indices of systolic function. The ratio between peak early and late mitral diastolic flow (E/A ratio) and isovolumic relaxation time were used as indices of diastolic function. In the xamoterol group, there was a deterioration in E-point septal separation (P < 0.05). A difference between the treatment groups was present both at 3 months (E-point septal separation 11.4 vs 13.0 mm, P < 0.01, fractional shortening 27.1 vs 25.2%, P < 0.05) and 12 months (E-point septal separation 11.1 vs 13.2 mm. P < 0.005, fractional shortening 26.9 vs 25.0%, P < 0.05). E/A ratio increased in the metoprolol group (P < 0.05) but not in the xamoterol group. At 3 months there was a significant difference (0.85 vs 0.67, P < 0.005) between the groups but not at 12 months. In comparison with the beta 1-receptor antagonist metoprolol, the beta 1-receptor partial agonist xamoterol impaired left ventricular systolic function in patients with clinical evidence of heart failure after an acute myocardial infarction.

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗
PubMed1990

Xamoterol in severe heart failure. The Xamoterol in Severe Heart Failure Study Group.

516 patients with New York Heart Association class III and IV heart failure despite treatment with diuretics and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors were randomised in a double-blind between-group comparison to xamoterol 200 mg (352) or placebo (164) twice daily for 13 weeks. There was no difference between the treatments in loss of clinical signs. Visual analogue scale and Likert scores indicated that breathlessness was less severe with xamoterol, but there was no difference in exercise duration or total work done. Xamoterol reduced maximum exercise heart rate and systolic blood pressure, did not affect the number of ventricular premature beats after exercise, showed no arrhythmogenic activity, and had variable (agonist and antagonist) effects on 24 h heart rate. On intention-to-treat analysis 32 (9.1%) patients in the xamoterol group and 6 (3.7%) patients in the placebo group died within 100 days of randomisation (p = 0.02).

Activities of Daily Living↗
PubMed1988

Double-blind placebo-controlled comparison of digoxin and xamoterol in chronic heart failure. The German and Austrian Xamoterol Study Group.

433 patients aged 29-80 with mild to moderate heart failure entered a multicentre double-blind randomised between-patient comparison of xamoterol 200 mg twice daily, digoxin 0.125 mg twice daily, and placebo. Patients were assessed at baseline and after three months. Of 349 who completed the double-blind phase, 300 had valid exercise tests. Compared with placebo, xamoterol significantly increased exercise duration and work done on a bicycle ergometer and improved breathlessness and tiredness during daily life as assessed by visual analogue scale and by Likert scale. Digoxin showed no statistically significant advantage over placebo on any of the measures except the Likert scale. Exercise performance and work done were significantly higher with xamoterol than with digoxin.

Adrenergic beta-Agonists↗
PubMed1984

Cardioselectivity, kinetics, hemodynamics, and metabolic effects of xamoterol.

Xamoterol is a new orally active partial beta-adrenoceptor agonist. Its kinetics, hemodynamic and metabolic effects, and cardioselectivity were investigated in eight normal subjects. Plasma xamoterol concentrations after 100 micrograms/kg iv declined biexponentially over 8 hr and t 1/2 beta averaged 2.6 hr. Resting heart rate (HR) increased slightly in the supine position but was unchanged on sitting. Systolic blood pressure (SBP) rose by 5 to 10 mm Hg and cardiac index (CI) rose 15% to 20%. Both parameters were above control values 6 hr after dosing, when plasma xamoterol concentrations had fallen to about 10 ng/ml. There were no changes in diastolic or mean arterial pressure (MAP). During graded exercise the effects of xamoterol on HR and SBP were the reverse of those at rest, with lowering of exercise HR and SBP at higher work loads. CI during exercise was not altered by xamoterol. Doses of xamoterol were calculated from the kinetic data to give plasma concentrations of 100, 200, 400, and 800 ng/ml. HR and blood pressure effects at each xamoterol level were compared before and after inhibition of cardiovascular reflexes with prazosin, atropine, and clonidine. Hemodynamic effects of xamoterol and isoproterenol were compared. Before autonomic block xamoterol increased HR by 10 bpm and MAP by 7 mm Hg at the highest dose. After autonomic block there was a 200% to 300% rise in HR at each dose and MAP still rose. The rise in MAP after block could be entirely accounted for by a 23% increase in CI because total peripheral resistance did not change. The effects of isoproterenol after autonomic block were a rise in HR and a fall in MAP. Metabolic responses to xamoterol were measured at the four dose levels. There was a dose-related increase in nonesterified fatty acids and a fall in plasma lactate levels but no changes in plasma renin activity or blood glucose. Results suggest that xamoterol is a cardioselective partial beta-adrenoceptor agonist in man.

Adrenergic beta-Agonists↗
PubMed1987

Comparative analysis of beta-1 adrenoceptor agonist and antagonist potency and selectivity of cicloprolol, xamoterol and pindolol.

The partial beta adrenoceptor agonist properties of cicloprolol, xamoterol and pindolol have been compared in vivo (anesthetized catecholamine-depleted or pithed rats) and in vitro (guinea pig or rat right atria and guinea pig tracheal muscle preparations) conditions. All three compounds increased heart rate in the former preparations, and their intrinsic activities relative to isoproterenol were 0.7, 0.65 and 0.45, respectively. The positive chronotropic effects of cicloprolol or xamoterol were competitively antagonized by betaxolol or propranolol; however, part of those induced by pindolol were resistant to these beta adrenoceptor antagonists. None of these compounds increased the spontaneous beating rate of isolated guinea pig atria; however, xamoterol only increased heart rate in isolated rat atria, and its intrinsic activity with respect to isoproterenol was 0.4. Pindolol, xamoterol and cicloprolol behaved as competitive beta-1 adrenoceptor antagonists against isoproterenol-induced tachycardia in a pithed rat model. In order to mimic the intrinsic effects of the partial agonist drugs, control dose-response curves for isoproterenol were determined in pithed rats in which the base-line heart rate was elevated by thoracic spinal cord stimulation. In this in vivo preparation, xamoterol and pindolol were more potent beta-1 adrenoceptor antagonists than cicloprolol; however, cicloprolol and xamoterol, in contrast to pindolol, were selective for beta-1 adrenoceptors. In isolated spontaneously beating guinea pig right atria, cicloprolol and xamoterol were equipotent beta-1 adrenoceptor antagonists but were about 50 times less potent than pindolol. In isolated rat atria, the beta-1 adrenoceptor antagonist potency of xamoterol was greater (pA2 = 8.7) than in guinea pig atria (pA2 = 7.8). The potencies of cicloprolol and pindolol did not vary between these species. In catecholamine-depleted rats, high i.v. doses of cicloprolol had vasodilator activity that was partly mediated by beta-2 adrenoceptors. In carbachol-contracted guinea pig trachea, cicloprolol and xamoterol, in contrast to pindolol, were relatively inactive against isoproterenol-induced relaxation. In conclusion, cicloprolol and xamoterol, similarly to pindolol, behave as agonists and antagonists of beta-1 adrenoceptors. However, only cicloprolol and xamoterol show an elevated degree of selectivity toward the beta-1 adrenoceptor subtype.

Adrenergic beta-Agonists↗
PubMed1987

Pharmacological analysis of the cardiac actions of xamoterol, a beta adrenoceptor antagonist with partial agonistic activity, in guinea pig heart: evidence for involvement of adenylate cyclase system in its cardiac stimulant actions.

The pharmacological effects of xamoterol, a beta adrenoceptor antagonist with partial agonistic activity, were examined in guinea pig cardiac preparations and compared with those of isoproterenol to assess possible mechanisms of its cardiac stimulant actions. Xamoterol produced a positive inotropic effect in the papillary muscles and a positive chronotropic effect in the spontaneously beating right atria in a concentration-dependent manner. The maximum inotropic and chronotropic effects of xamoterol were about 33 and 35% of those of isoproterenol, respectively. Although xamoterol failed to produce a consistent increase in contractile force in the left atria, the positive inotropic effect of the agent was observed clearly in preparations obtained from reserpine-pretreated animals. The positive inotropic and chronotropic effects of xamoterol were antagonized by atenolol, but not by ICI 118,551. On the other hand, xamoterol antagonized competitively the positive inotropic and chronotropic responses to isoproterenol. In papillary muscles the increases in contractile force induced by xamoterol and isoproterenol were depressed markedly in the presence of carbachol or adenosine. In all of left atria, right atria and papillary muscles obtained from reserpine-pretreated animals, xamoterol caused a significant elevation in cyclic AMP levels, while inhibiting the isoproterenol-induced increase in cyclic AMP levels. Computer-assisted analysis of concentration-response curves for the inhibition by xamoterol of the binding of [125I]iodocyanopindolol in the membranes from guinea pig ventricles showed the existence of the 5'-guanylylimidodiphosphate sensitive, highly affinity site of beta adrenoceptors for xamoterol, suggesting that xamoterol may induce the formation of a ternary complex with the beta adrenoceptor and a stimulatory guanine nucleotide regulatory protein.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adenosine↗
PubMed1990

Effects of xamoterol on inotropic and lusitropic properties of the human myocardium and on adenylate cyclase activity.

The purpose of the present study was to characterize the effects of xamoterol in the human myocardium. In the presence of forskolin or milrinone, xamoterol increased isometric force of contraction, contraction velocity, and relaxation velocity in isolated, electrically driven preparations from human myocardium, but had no effect alone. There was no difference in the effect of xamoterol between right atrial myocardium and left ventricular myocardium from nonfailing (NF), moderately failing (NYHA II-III), and severely failing (NYHA IV) human hearts. The positive inotropic and lusitropic effects of isoprenaline were reduced depending on the severity of heart failure in left ventricular myocardium (i.e., NF greater than NYHA II-III greater than NYHA IV). In the presence of norepinephrine, xamoterol produced negative inotropic effects similar to those of the beta-adrenoceptor antagonists pindolol and propranolol. Xamoterol alone had no effects on force of contraction, whereas pindolol and propranolol markedly reduced contractile force. In NYHA class IV, isoprenaline stimulated adenylate cyclase about twofold but xamoterol, like pindolol or propranolol, had no effect. Experiments with the beta 1- and beta 2-selective antagonists CGP 207.12A and ICI 118.551, respectively, showed that the positive inotropic and lusitropic effects of xamoterol were mediated by beta 1-adrenoceptors. Consistently, xamoterol had a selectivity of 13.8 at beta 1-adrenoceptors as measured in radioligand binding experiments. It is concluded that xamoterol acts as a beta 1-adrenoceptor antagonist with a selectivity of 13.8 in human ventricular myocardium. The compound has an intrinsic sympathomimetic activity, as it produces beta 1-adrenoceptor-mediated positive inotropic and lusitropic effects in the presence of forskolin. The beneficial effects of xamoterol in patients with heart failure could be due to prevention of the detrimental effects of norepinephrine such as beta 1-adrenoceptor downregulation of an increase of Gi (inhibitory guanine-nucleotide binding protein).

Adenylyl Cyclases↗
PubMed1999

Ketotifen and cardiovascular effects of xamoterol following single and chronic dosing in healthy volunteers.

AIMS: To study whether desensitization occurs after long-term administration of the 1-adrenoceptor partial agonist xamoterol and, if so, whether this can be influenced by ketotifen. METHODS: In a double-blind, randomized design 10 young, healthy males received ketotifen (2 x 1 mg day(-1) p.o.) or placebo for 3 weeks with xamoterol (2 x 200 mg day(-1) p.o.) administered concomitantly during the last 2 weeks. 'l1-adrenoceptor mediated responses were assessed as exercise-induced tachycardia and isoprenaline-induced shortening of heart rate corrected electromechanical systole (QS2c); isoprenaline-induced tachycardia was measured as a mixed beta1-/beta2-adrenoceptor-mediated effect. RESULTS: The first dose of xamoterol significantly increased resting heart rate and systolic blood pressure and significantly shortened QS2c. The last dose of xamoterol after 2 weeks of treatment still produced the same responses. Ketotifen did not influence these effects of xamoterol on resting haemodynamics. The first dose of xamoterol caused a rightward shift of the exercise- and isoprenaline-induced tachycardia (mean dose ratios+/-s.e.mean: 1.20+/-0.05 and 2.46+/-0.23) and the isoprenaline-evoked shortening of QS2c (dose ratio 3.59+/-0.68). This rightward shift was even more pronounced after 2 weeks xamoterol treatment. This additional rightward shift after 2 weeks of xamoterol was not affected by ketotifen (mean difference (95% CI) of log transformed dose ratios between placebo and ketotifen: exercise tachycardia 0.001 (-0.03; 0.04); isoprenaline tachycardia 0.03 (-0.15; 0.21); isoprenaline induced shortening of QS2c 0.13 (-0.22; 0.48)). CONCLUSIONS: In humans xamoterol is a partial beta1-adrenoceptor agonist with positive chrono- and inotropic effects at rest and antagonistic properties under conditions of beta-adrenoceptor stimulation. These effects were well maintained after chronic dosing with no signs of beta1-adrenoceptor desensitization. Ketotifen does not change the beta-adrenoceptor mediated responses of xamoterol after chronic dosing.

Adrenergic beta-Agonists↗
PubMed1989

Digoxin and xamoterol in patients with moderate chronic heart failure. A double-blind, randomized, controlled study.

Xamoterol is a partial beta 1 adrenoceptor agonist with positive inotropic properties. Treatment with xamoterol and digoxin was compared in 19 patients with cardiac failure (NYHA class II-III). The study consisted of a short-term and a long-term phase. The former was a randomized, double-blind, crossover study with 6-week treatment periods. In the 15 patients who completed this phase, there was no significant difference between exercise duration on digoxin and on xamoterol. Exercise duration increased on digoxin by 27% and on xamoterol by 17% relative to baseline. Comparing digoxin and xamoterol, maximum exercise heart rate (p less than 0.001), blood pressure (p less than 0.01), and the pressure-rate product during maximum exercise were significantly lower on xamoterol treatment. The systolic time interval was shorter on digoxin than on xamoterol (p less than 0.001). No changes occurred in the echocardiographic parameters. After the short-term study, 13 patients were followed 3-6 months on the drug to which they had responded best (digoxin 7, xamoterol 6). The results of the short-term study were maintained during this period. In conclusion, we found that xamoterol may be an alternative to digoxin in patients with mild to moderate heart failure.

Adrenergic beta-Agonists↗
PubMed1992

Selective and full beta 1-adrenoceptor agonist action of a catechol derivative of denopamine (T-0509) in the guinea-pig cardiac muscle and trachea: comparison with denopamine, xamoterol and isoprenaline.

1. The pharmacological actions of T-0509, a 3-hydroxy derivative of denopamine, were studied in various guinea-pig tissues; these effects were compared with those of isoprenaline, denopamine and xamoterol. 2. The intrinsic activities of the positive inotropic actions of T-0509, denopamine and xamoterol compared with isoprenaline (= 100%) in the papillary muscle were 99%, 83% and 28%, respectively, while their relative potencies (EC50 agonist EC50 isoprenaline) were 0.23, 33 and 1.4, respectively. The intrinsic activities of T-0509, denopamine and xamoterol as positive chronotropic agents in the right atria were 98%, 69% and 48%, respectively, and their equipotent concentrations (isoprenaline = 1) were 0.24, 50 and 4, respectively. 3. The positive chronotropic actions of T-0509 and denopamine were antagonized by bisoprolol (3 x 10(-8) M), but not by ICI 118,551 (3 x 10(-8) M). 4. The intrinsic activity of T-0509 in histamine-contracted tracheae was similar to that of isoprenaline, but its equipotent concentration was 38; the effects of both agents were antagonized by ICI 118,551 (3 x 10(-8) M), but not by bisoprolol (3 x 10(-8) M). Denopamine and xamoterol did not show any agonist activity on guinea-pig trachea. 5. Denopamine and xamoterol antagonized the positive chronotropic (pA2, denopamine: 6.98, xamoterol: 7.75) and tracheal relaxant (pA2, denopamine: 5.39, xamoterol: 6.25) effects of isoprenaline. 6. Isoprenaline, T-0509 and denopamine, but not xamoterol, contracted the guinea-pig aorta in a decreasing order in the presence of propranolol (10(-6) M).7. Based on the above studies, T-0509 appears to be a highly selective betaI-adrenoceptor agonist with full agonist properties, while denopamine and xamoterol appear to be selective, but partial betaI-adrenoceptor agonists.

Adrenergic beta-Agonists↗
PubMed1995

Effects of beta receptor antagonists in patients with clinical evidence of heart failure after myocardial infarction: double blind comparison of metoprolol and xamoterol.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether xamoterol, a partial agonist, would improve exercise time more than metoprolol in patients with mild to moderate heart failure after a myocardial infarction. DESIGN: Single-centre double blind randomised parallel group comparison of metoprolol 50-100 mg and xamoterol 100-200 mg twice daily. PATIENTS: 210 patients aged 40-80 years (173 men) with clinical evidence of heart failure early after a myocardial infarction. 106 were given metoprolol and 104 xamoterol. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Exercise test results and performance at three months; the exercise test, quality of life, and clinical assessments at baseline (5-7 days after the infarction) and after 3, 6, and 12 months. RESULTS: Exercise time increased at three months by 22% in the metoprolol group and 29% in the xamoterol group, but with no significant difference between the groups. Patients taking xamoterol showed overall non-significantly higher mean values of exercise time achieved with higher heart rates at rest and exercise. Improvements in quality of life, clinical signs of heart failure, and New York Heart Association functional class were seen in both treatment groups over one year, with minor benefits of xamoterol on breathlessness, peripheral oedema, and functional class. Eighteen patients taking metoprolol and 22 taking xamoterol withdrew from the study during one year, with a low mortality, reinfarction rate, and progress of heart failure in both treatment groups. Mean dose from baseline to 3 months was 135 mg metoprolol and 347 mg xamoterol. CONCLUSION: beta 1 Receptor antagonists with or without partial agonist activity are safe to use in mild to moderate heart failure after a myocardial infarction. Exercise tolerance, quality of life, and clinical signs and functional class of heart failure improve, and few patients show deterioration in their condition. Exercise tolerance is no better with xamoterol than metoprolol.

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗
PubMed1990

Lack of tolerance development after long-term administration of the partial beta-adrenoceptor agonist xamoterol.

Xamoterol is a selective partial beta-adrenoceptor agonist. In a double-blind randomized placebo-controlled study, 30 patients (1 female, 29 male) with mild to moderate heart failure were treated with 200 mg of xamoterol twice daily or placebo during 3 months. At baseline and 72 h after the last tablet intake, the hemodynamic and humoral effects of a single intravenous dose of xamoterol (0.2 mg/kg) were assessed by right heart catheterization. At baseline, intravenous xamoterol raised resting heart rate by 3% (NS) in the placebo and by 6% (NS) in the xamoterol group. On exercise, heart rate was reduced by 10% (p = 0.015) and 7% (p = 0.016), respectively. Pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) dropped in both groups: at rest by 4 mm Hg (p = 0.0004) in the placebo group and by 6 mm Hg (p = 0.0002) in the xamoterol group; on exercise by 1 mm Hg (NS) in the placebo and by 6 mm Hg (p = 0.0001) in the xamoterol group. Similar changes of all variables were obtained after long-term therapy in both groups. Mean arterial blood pressure, cardiac index and systemic vascular resistance did not change importantly. Norepinephrine levels did not change, but plasma renin activity decreased at baseline as well as after long-term therapy in both groups by similar amounts. Thus, no signs of tolerance development were observed after an oral treatment with 200 mg of xamoterol twice daily during 3 months. However, xamoterol as a partial agonist exerted only weak changes of cardiac index and PCWP compared to full beta-adrenoceptor agonists. The drug was well tolerated, and serious side effects were absent.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed1989

Xamoterol activates beta 1- but not beta 2-adrenoceptors in mammalian myocardium: comparison of its affinity for beta 1- and beta 2-adrenoceptors coupled to the adenylate cyclase in feline and human ventricle with positive inotropic effects.

The mode of action of xamoterol, a beta 1-selective partial agonist, was investigated in feline myocardium. Xamoterol bound with an 18-fold greater affinity to ventricular beta 1-adrenoceptors (labeled with [3H](-)-bisoprolol) than to beta 2-adrenoceptors (labeled with [3H]ICI 118,551). Xamoterol had a 10-20-fold higher affinity for ventricular beta 1-adrenoceptors coupled to the adenylate cyclase than for cyclase-coupled beta 2-adrenoceptors. The intrinsic activity of xamoterol with respect to (-)-norepinephrine was 0.5 in right ventricular papillary muscles (force), 0.6 in left atria (force); 0.6 in right atria (sinoatrial rate) and 0.1-0.2 in ventricular membranes (cyclase). The stimulant effects of xamoterol were antagonized by beta 1-specific CGP 20,712 A but not by beta 2-selective ICI 118,551. Xamoterol activated only beta 1-adrenoceptors, while beta 2-adrenoceptors occupied by xamoterol remained silent. The positive inotropic effects of a nearly maximally effective xamoterol concentration were associated with a considerably greater beta 1-mediated cyclase stimulation than the same inotropic effect of (-)-norepinephrine. In human ventricular membranes xamoterol stimulated marginally the adenylate cyclase and antagonized the effects of (-)-norepinephrine with a 30-fold greater affinity for beta 1- than for beta 2-adrenoceptors.

Adenylyl Cyclases↗
PubMed1993

Renal effects of xamoterol in patients with moderate heart failure.

The acute renal effects of xamoterol, a partial beta 1-agonist, were studied in 12 patients with congestive heart failure (NYHA II-III) in stable condition on diuretic therapy for at least 6 weeks. Each patient was given a single intravenous infusion of xamoterol (0.2 mg/kg) or placebo in random order 2 weeks apart. Using constant infusion and lithium clearance techniques, clearance and excretion measurements were made in the supine position at 30- to 60-min intervals before, during, and up to 6 hours after infusion. Blood pressure, heart rate, renal plasma flow, glomerular filtration rate, and urinary flow rate remained unchanged, but xamoterol lowered sodium excretion by 30% (p < 0.05). The decrease started 120 minutes after infusion. Proximal reabsorption of sodium increased after xamoterol infusion, whereas plasma values of aldosterone and angiotensin II were unaffected. It is concluded that the acute renal effects of xamoterol imply an impaired sodium excretion determined by the tubular actions of the drug. The present results suggest that xamoterol may aggravate one of the important abnormalities intrinsic to the pathology of congestive heart failure. These findings are in contrast to the beneficial effects of xamoterol demonstrated in many clinical trials where xamoterol was given orally for a longer period.

Aged↗
PubMed1990

Neuroendocrine changes post myocardial infarction: effects of xamoterol.

This study reports the effects of the new beta 1 adrenoceptor partial agonist, xamoterol, on neuroendocrine activity after acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Fifty-one consecutive patients with AMI were randomized to treatment with xamoterol, 200 mg twice a day, or placebo; patients were also stratified as to whether or not diuretic therapy was given for left ventricular dysfunction. Noradrenaline, plasma renin activity (PRA), and atrial natriuretic factor (ANF) were measured over a 10-day period. Noradrenaline concentrations are higher (p less than 0.05) in patients treated with diuretics at the time of admission and fell over the subsequent 10 days (p less than 0.01). Treatment with xamoterol did not affect this noradrenaline response to myocardial infarction. PRA was also significantly higher in the patients treated with diuretics, and there was a nonsignificant trend for xamoterol to blunt the PRA response in these patients. There was no difference in ANF levels between those patients who were treated with diuretics and those who were not; xamoterol did not affect ANF. Thus xamoterol does not further elevate noradrenaline levels as do conventional beta blockers, and it does not activate the renin-angiotensin system as do potent nonselective beta agonists. Furthermore, xamoterol does not increase ANF levels, probably because it is not negatively inotropic. We conclude that xamoterol does not cause deleterious neuroendocrine changes in patients with AMI even in those treated for heart failure.

Adrenergic beta-Agonists↗