Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Vorinostat”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2006

Vorinostat, a histone deacetylase inhibitor, enhances the response of human tumor cells to ionizing radiation through prolongation of gamma-H2AX foci.

Vorinostat (suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid) is the prototype of a family of hybrid polar compounds that can induce growth arrest in transformed cells and shows promise for the treatment of cancer. Vorinostat specifically binds to and inhibits the activity of histone deacetylases resulting in acetylation of nucleosomal histones and an activation of gene transcription. Because histone deacetylases modulate chromatin structure and gene expression, both of which can influence radioresponse, this study was designed to examine the capacity of Vorinostat to influence radiation response in human tumor cells and investigate the mechanism underlying these interactions. Vorinostat induced hyperacetylation of histone H4 in a dose-dependent manner. We tested its ability to radiosensitize three human tumor cell lines (A375, MeWo, and A549) using clonogenic cell survival assays. Clonogenic cell survival assay showed that Vorinostat significantly radiosensitized all three tumor cell lines, substantially reducing the surviving fraction at 2 Gy. We examined potential mechanisms that may contribute to the enhanced radiation response induced by Vorinostat. Vorinostat and radiation alone did not induce apoptosis in the melanoma cell line. However, enhanced apoptosis was observed when cells were exposed to both Vorinostat and radiation, suggesting that Vorinostat renders tumor cells more susceptible to radiation-induced apoptosis. Results from DNA damage repair analysis in cultured A375 cells showed that Vorinostat had a strong inhibitory effect on the nonhomologous end joining pathway after radiation. A detailed examination of the involvement of the DNA repair pathway following Vorinostat treatment showed that Vorinostat reduced the expression of the repair-related genes Ku70, Ku80, and Rad50 in A375 cells as detected by Western blot analysis. We also examined gamma-H2AX phosphorylation as a predictive marker of radiotherapy response to Vorinostat and observed that the combination of Vorinostat and radiation caused a prolongation of expression of DNA repair proteins such as gamma-H2AX. Overall, we conclude that Vorinostat enhances tumor radioresponse by multiple mechanisms that may involve antiproliferative growth inhibition and effects on DNA repair after exposure to radiation.

Acetylation↗
PubMed2006

A study to determine the effects of food and multiple dosing on the pharmacokinetics of vorinostat given orally to patients with advanced cancer.

PURPOSE: This phase I study, conducted in advanced-stage cancer patients, assessed the safety and tolerability of oral vorinostat (suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid), single-dose and multiple-dose pharmacokinetics of vorinostat, and the effect of a high-fat meal on vorinostat pharmacokinetics. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Patients (n = 23) received single doses of 400 mg vorinostat on day 1 (fasted) and day 5 (fed) with 48 hours of pharmacokinetic sampling on both days. Patients received 400 mg vorinostat once daily on days 7 to 28. On day 28, vorinostat was given (fed) with pharmacokinetic sampling for 24 hours after dose. RESULTS: The apparent t(1/2) of vorinostat was short (approximately 1.5 hours). A high-fat meal was associated with a small increase in the extent of absorption and a modest decrease in the rate of absorption. A short lag time was observed before detectable levels of vorinostat were observed in the fed state, and T(max) was delayed. Vorinostat concentrations were qualitatively similar following single-dose and multiple-dose administration; the accumulation ratio based on area under the curve was 1.21. The elimination of vorinostat occurred primarily through metabolism, with <1% of the given dose recovered intact in urine. The most common vorinostat-related adverse experiences were mild to moderate nausea, anorexia, fatigue, increased blood creatinine, and vomiting. CONCLUSIONS: Vorinostat concentrations were qualitatively similar after single and multiple doses. A high-fat meal increased the extent and modestly decreased the rate of absorption of vorinostat; this effect is not anticipated to be clinically meaningful. Continued investigation of 400 mg vorinostat given once daily in phase II and III efficacy studies is warranted.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2006

Stability studies of vorinostat and its two metabolites in human plasma, serum and urine.

Effects of storage time and freeze-thaw procedure on the stability of vorinostat (suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid) and its two metabolites, vorinostat O-glucuronide (M1) and 4-anilino-4-oxobutanoic acid (M2), in human plasma, serum and urine have been examined using high turbulence liquid chromatography (HTLC) online extraction and tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) [L. Du, D.G. Musson, A.Q. Wang, Rapid Commun. Mass Spectrom. 19 (2005) 1779-1787]. Vorinostat was demonstrated not to be stable in human plasma during the process of sample processing and storage. Acidifying the plasma sample to prevent possible enzymatic hydrolysis and using plasma with different anticoagulants were evaluated to increase the stability of vorinostat, but neither of these approaches improved stability. Human serum was then used as an alternative to plasma to monitor drug concentration, and vorinostat and its two metabolites maintained consistent concentrations in human serum after 3 freeze-thaw cycles and more than 1 year storage at -70 degrees C. By comparing the stability results of serum, EDTA plasma and heparin plasma, it was deduced that clotting proteins of plasma might be a major cause of vorinostat degradation. The stability of the three analytes during the process of serum sample collection was verified indicating that prolonged sample collection (up to 180 min) has no effect on the integrity of these analytes.

Drug Stability↗
PubMed2006

Cotreatment with vorinostat (suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid) enhances activity of dasatinib (BMS-354825) against imatinib mesylate-sensitive or imatinib mesylate-resistant chronic myelogenous leukemia cells.

PURPOSE: We determined the effects of vorinostat [suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid (SAHA)] and/or dasatinib, a dual Abl/Src kinase (tyrosine kinase) inhibitor, on the cultured human (K562 and LAMA-84) or primary chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML) cells, as well as on the murine pro-B BaF3 cells with ectopic expression of the unmutated and kinase domain-mutant forms of Bcr-Abl. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Following exposure to dasatinib and/or vorinostat, apoptosis, loss of clonogenic survival, as well as the activity and levels of Bcr-Abl and its downstream signaling proteins were determined. RESULTS: Treatment with dasatinib attenuated the levels of autophosphorylated Bcr-Abl, p-CrkL, phospho-signal transducer and activator of transcription 5 (p-STAT5), p-c-Src, and p-Lyn; inhibited the activity of Lyn and c-Src; and induced apoptosis of the cultured CML cells. Combined treatment of cultured human CML and BaF3 cells with vorinostat and dasatinib induced more apoptosis than either agent alone, as well as synergistically induced loss of clonogenic survival, which was associated with greater depletion of Bcr-Abl, p-CrkL, and p-STAT5 levels. Cotreatment with dasatinib and vorinostat also attenuated the levels of Bcr-AblE255K and Bcr-AblT315I and induced apoptosis of BaF3 cells with ectopic expression of the mutant forms of Bcr-Abl. Finally, cotreatment of the primary CML cells with vorinostat and dasatinib induced more loss of cell viability and depleted Bcr-Abl or Bcr-AblT315I, p-STAT5, and p-CrkL levels than either agent alone. CONCLUSIONS: As shown here, the preclinical in vitro activity of vorinostat and dasatinib against cultured and primary CML cells supports the in vivo testing of the combination in imatinib mesylate-sensitive and imatinib mesylate-resistant CML cells.

Animals↗
PubMed2006

Phase 2 trial of oral vorinostat (suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid, SAHA) for refractory cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL).

The activity and safety of the histone deacetylase inhibitor vorinostat (suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid, SAHA) were evaluated in patients with refractory cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL). Group 1 received vorinostat 400 mg daily, group 2 received vorinostat 300 mg twice daily for 3 days with 4 days rest, and group 3 received vorinostat 300 mg twice daily for 14 days with 7 days rest followed by 200 mg twice daily. Treatment continued until disease progression or intolerable toxicity. The primary objective was to determine the complete and partial response (PR) rate. Time to response (TTR), time to progressive disease (TTP), response duration (DOR), pruritus relief, and safety were determined. Thirty-three patients who had received a median of 5 prior therapies were enrolled. Eight patients achieved a PR, including 7 with advanced disease and 4 with Sézary syndrome. The median TTR, DOR, and TTP for responders were 11.9, 15.1, and 30.2 weeks, respectively. Fourteen of 31 evaluable patients had pruritus relief. The most common drug-related AEs were fatigue, thrombocytopenia, diarrhea, and nausea. The most common grade 3 or 4 drug-related AEs were thrombocytopenia and dehydration. Vorinostat demonstrated activity in heavily pretreated patients with CTCL. The 400 mg daily regimen had the most favorable safety profile and is being further evaluated.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

A liquid chromatography-electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometric assay for quantitation of the histone deacetylase inhibitor, vorinostat (suberoylanilide hydroxamicacid, SAHA), and its metabolites in human serum.

Vorinostat (suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid, SAHA) is undergoing evaluation as an antineoplastic agent. We developed a liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) assay for quantitating vorinostat and its major metabolites, vorinostat glucuronide and 4-anilino-4-oxobutanoic acid, in human serum. The assay uses: deuterated internal standards; acetonitrile protein precipitation; a BDS Hypersil C18 (3 microm, 100 mm x 3 mm) column; a gradient mobile phase of 0.5% acetic acid in acetonitrile and water; and electrospray positive-mode ionization with selected reaction monitoring (SRM) detection. The lower limit of quantitation was 3.0 ng/ml for each analyte. The assay is being employed in at least 12 clinical studies of vorinostat-containing regimens.

Chromatography, Liquid↗
PubMed2007

Dimethyl sulfoxide to vorinostat: development of this histone deacetylase inhibitor as an anticancer drug.

In our quest to understand why dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) can cause growth arrest and terminal differentiation of transformed cells, we followed a path that led us to discover suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid (SAHA; vorinostat (Zolinza)), which is a histone deacetylase inhibitor. SAHA reacts with and blocks the catalytic site of these enzymes. Extensive structure-activity studies were done along the path from DMSO to SAHA. SAHA can cause growth arrest and death of a broad variety of transformed cells both in vitro and in tumor-bearing animals at concentrations not toxic to normal cells. SAHA has many protein targets whose structure and function are altered by acetylation, including chromatin-associated histones, nonhistone gene transcription factors and proteins involved in regulation of cell proliferation, migration and death. In clinical trials, SAHA has shown significant anticancer activity against both hematologic and solid tumors at doses well tolerated by patients. A new drug application was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for vorinostat for treatment of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. More potent analogs of SAHA have shown unacceptable toxicity.

Animals↗
PubMed2007

Suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid (vorinostat) represses androgen receptor expression and acts synergistically with an androgen receptor antagonist to inhibit prostate cancer cell proliferation.

Growth of prostate cancer cells is initially dependent on androgens, and androgen ablation therapy is used to control tumor growth. Unfortunately, resistance to androgen ablation therapy inevitably occurs, and there is an urgent need for better treatments for advanced prostate cancer. Histone deacetylase inhibitors, such as suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid (SAHA; vorinostat), are promising agents for the treatment of a range of malignancies, including prostate cancer. SAHA inhibited growth of the androgen-responsive LNCaP prostate cancer cell line at low micromolar concentrations and induced caspase-dependent apoptosis associated with chromatin condensation, DNA fragmentation, and mitochondrial membrane depolarization at higher concentrations (>/=5 mumol/L). Gene profiling and immunoblot analyses showed a decrease in androgen receptor (AR) mRNA and protein in LNCaP cells cultured with SAHA compared with control cells, with a corresponding decrease in levels of the AR-regulated gene, prostate-specific antigen. Culture of LNCaP cells in steroid-free medium markedly sensitized the cells to SAHA. Moreover, a combination of low, subeffective doses of SAHA and the AR antagonist bicalutamide resulted in a synergistic reduction in cell proliferation and increase in caspase-dependent cell death. Addition of exogenous androgen prevented the induction of cell death, indicating that suppression of androgen signaling was required for synergy. At the subeffective concentrations, these agents had no effect, alone or in combination, on proliferation or death of AR-negative PC-3 prostate cancer cells. Our findings indicate that SAHA is effective in targeting the AR signaling axis and that androgen deprivation sensitizes prostate cancer cells to SAHA. Consequently, combinatorial treatments that target different components of the AR pathway may afford a more effective strategy to control the growth of prostate cancer cells.

Androgen Receptor Antagonists↗
PubMed2006

Antileukemia activity of the combination of an anthracycline with a histone deacetylase inhibitor.

We studied the cellular and molecular effects of the combination of an anthracycline with 2 different histone deacetylase inhibitors (HDACIs): vorinostat (suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid) and valproic acid (VPA). The 10% inhibitory concentration (IC(10)) of idarubicin was 0.5 nM in MOLT4 and 1.5 nM in HL60 cells. Concentrations above 0.675 microM of vorinostat resulted in at least 80% loss of cell viability in both cell lines. Concentrations of 1.5 to 3 mM of VPA induced 50% to 60% loss in viability in HL60 and 80% in MOLT4 cells. The combination of idarubicin with vorinostat at 0.075 microM or VPA at 0.25 mM resulted in at least an additive loss of cell viability in both lines. Vorinostat (0.35 microM) and VPA (0.25 mM) in combination with idarubicin (0.5 nM) resulted in a significant increase in apoptotic cells in MOLT4 cells. The combination resulted in an increase in histone H3 and H4 acetylation at 24 hours, phosphorylated H2AX, as well as in the induction of p21(CIP1) mRNA. No effect on cell cycle transition was observed. Of importance, the cellular and molecular effects observed were independent of the sequence used. In summary, the combination of an anthracycline with an HDACI should have significant clinical activity in patients with leukemia.

Acetylation↗
PubMed2006

Intrinsic apoptotic and thioredoxin pathways in human prostate cancer cell response to histone deacetylase inhibitor.

There is a great need to develop better mechanism-based therapies for prostate cancer. In this investigation, we studied four human prostate cancer cell lines, LNCaP, DU145, LAPC4, and PC3, which differ in response to the histone deacetylase inhibitor, suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid (vorinostat), a new anticancer drug. Examining the role of intrinsic mitochondrial caspase-dependent apoptosis and caspase-independent, reactive oxygen species (ROS) facilitated cell death, has provided an understanding of mechanisms that may determine the varied response to the histone deacetylase inhibitor. We found striking differences among these cancer cells in constitutive expression and response to suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid in levels of antiapoptotic and proapoptotic proteins, mitochondria membrane integrity, activation of caspases, ROS accumulation, and expression of thioredoxin, the major scavenger of ROS. Identifying these differences can have predictive value in assessing therapeutic response and identifying targets to enhance therapeutic efficacy.

Antineoplastic Agents↗
PubMed2006

Potential role of histone deacetylase inhibitors in mesothelioma: clinical experience with suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid.

BACKGROUND: Histone deacetylase inhibitors are a novel class of therapeutic agents that inhibit deacetylate histones and other proteins involved in the regulation of gene expression and cell cycle progression. Phase I trials of intravenous and oral formulations of one such agent, vorinostat (suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid [SAHA]), have shown that it is safe and tolerable, that it inhibits histone deacetylation in peripheral blood mononuclear cells, and that it has a broad range of antitumor activity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirteen patients with mesothelioma were included in a phase I trial of oral SAHA. All but one had previously been treated with chemotherapy. RESULTS: Four patients completed > or = 6 cycles of therapy; 2 patients demonstrated a partial response. The toxicities in this cohort of patients were similar to those observed in the entire phase I trial: primarily fatigue, dehydration, nausea, and vomiting. CONCLUSION: Given the dearth of treatment options for patients with advanced mesothelioma who have progressed after first-line chemotherapy, these results are encouraging. A placebo-controlled, randomized phase III study of oral SAHA is now open for patients with mesothelioma in whom treatment with pemetrexed has failed.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2006

Antiproliferative activity of RAD001 (everolimus) as a single agent and combined with other agents in mantle cell lymphoma.

Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is an aggressive form of B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, with a mean survival of only 3-5 years and suboptimal therapeutic options. MCL is characterized by a balanced translocation t(11;14)(q13;q32), resulting in overexpression of cyclin D1, a G(1) cyclin regulated by the PI3K/Akt/mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) signaling pathway. As improved therapy for MCL is required and the mTOR pathway may be involved in its pathophysiology, the antiproliferative effects of RAD001 (everolimus), an mTOR inhibitor, against three MCL cell lines were investigated. As a single agent, RAD001 inhibited proliferation in MCL cell lines (Jeko1, SP49 and NCEB1) approximately 40-65% compared to diluent control cells. This was associated with G(1) cell-cycle arrest and reduced phosphorylation of the mTOR downstream target, 4E-BP1. Furthermore, combination drug studies revealed predominantly synergistic cytotoxicity with RAD001 and several secondary agents, including doxorubicin, vincristine or rituximab (components of the standard MCL regimen), as well as paclitaxel, vorinostat and bortezomib. These data indicate that single agent RAD001 is effective in inhibiting growth of MCL cells in vitro and combination studies with secondary agents further demonstrate synergistic cytotoxicity. Thus, these findings support future clinical studies of RAD001 in the treatment of MCL.

Antibiotics, Antineoplastic↗
PubMed2025

Exome-wide association study reveals 7 functional variants associated with ex-vivo drug response in acute myeloid leukemia patients.

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is an aggressive blood cancer characterized by poor survival outcomes. Further, due to the extreme molecular heterogeneity of the disease, drug treatment response varies from patient to patient. The variability of drug response can cause unnecessary treatment in more than half of the patients with no or partial therapy responses leading to severe side effects, monetary as well as time loss. Understanding the genetic risk factors underlying the drug response in AML can help with improved prediction of treatment responses and identification of biomarkers in addition to mechanistic insights to monitor treatment response. Here, we report the results of the first Exome-Wide Association Study (EWAS) of ex-vivo drug response performed to date with 175 AML cases and 47 drugs. We used information from 55,423 germline exonic SNPs to perform the analysis. We identified exome-wide significant (p&#x2009;<&#x2009;9.02&#x2009;&#xd7;&#x2009;10-&#x2009;7) associations for rs113985677 in CCIN with tamoxifen response, rs115400838 in TRMT5 with idelalisib response, rs11878277 in HDGFL2 with entinostat, and rs2229092 in LTA associated with vorinostat response. Further, using multivariate genome-wide association analysis, we identified the association of rs11556165 in ATRAID, and rs11236938 in TSKU with the combined response of all 47 drugs and 29 nonchemotherapy drugs at the genome-wide significance level (p&#x2009;<&#x2009;5&#x2009;&#xd7;&#x2009;10-&#x2009;8). Additionally, a significant association of rs35704242 in NIBAN1 was associated with the combined response for nonchemotherapy medicines (p&#x2009;=&#x2009;2.51&#x2009;&#xd7;&#x2009;10-&#x2009;8), and BI.2536, gefitinib, and belinostat were identified as the central traits. Our study represents the first EWAS to date on ex-vivo drug response in AML and reports 7 new associated loci that help to understand the anticancer drug response in AML patients.

Humans↗
PubMed2006

Gateways to clinical trials.

Gateways to Clinical Trials are a guide to the most recent clinical trials in current literature and congresses. The data in the following tables have been retrieved from the Clinical Trials Knowledge Area of Prous Science Integrity, the drug discovery and development portal, http://integrity.prous.com. This issue focuses on the following selection of drugs: ABT-510, adalimumab, alefacept, alemtuzumab, AMG-531, anakinra, armodafinil, asenapine maleate, atazanavir sulfate, atorvastatin; Bortezomib, bosentan; CEB-1555, cetuximab, ciclesonide, clodronate, CT-011; Darifenacin hydrobromide, desloratadine; E-7010, ecallantide, eculizumab, efalizumab, eltrombopag, erlotinib hydrochloride, eslicarbazepine acetate, eszopiclone, ezetimibe; Febuxostat, fosamprenavir calcium, fulvestrant; Gefitinib, genistein; Haemophilus influenzae B vaccine, human papillomavirus vaccine; Imatinib mesylate, insulin glargine; Lenalidomide, liposomal cisplatin; MAb G250, mapatumumab, midostaurin, MP4, mycophenolic acid sodium salt; Natalizumab, neridronic acid, NSC-330507; Oblimersen sodium, ofatumumab, omalizumab, oral insulin, oregovomab; Paliperidone, parathyroid hormone (human recombinant), peginterferon alfa-2a, peginterferon alfa-2b, peginterferon alfa-2b/ribavirin, pegylated arginine deiminase 20000, pemetrexed disodium, pimecrolimus, pitavastatin, pneumococcal 7-valent conjugate vaccine, prasterone, pregabalin, pumosetrag hydrochloride; Recombinant malaria vaccine, retigabine, rivaroxaban, Ro-26-9228, romidepsin, rosuvastatin calcium, rotavirus vaccine; SGN-30, sitaxsentan sodium, solifenacin succinate, sorafenib, sunitinib malate; Tadalafil, tegaserod maleate, temsirolimus, TER-199, tifacogin, tiludronic acid, tiotropium bromide; Vildagliptin, VNP-40101M, vorinostat; YM-150, yttrium 90 (90Y) ibritumomab tiuxetan; Zanolimumab, zoledronic acid monohydrate.

Clinical Trials as Topic↗
PubMed2006

Gateways to clinical trials.

Gateways to Clinical Trials are a guide to the most recent clinical trials in current literature and congresses. The data in the following tables have been retrieved from the Clinical Trials Knowledge Area of Prous Science Integrity, the drug discovery and development portal, http://integrity.prous.com. This issue focuses on the following selection of drugs: 131-I-chlorotoxin; Ad5CMV-p53, adalimumab, albumin interferon alfa, alemtuzumab, aliskiren fumarate, aminolevulinic acid methyl ester, anakinra, AR-C126532, atomoxetine hydrochloride; Bevacizumab, bosentan, botulinum toxin type B, brimonidine tartrate/timolol maleate; Calcipotriol/betamethasone dipropionate, cangrelor tetrasodium, cetuximab, ciclesonide, cinacalcet hydrochloride, collagen-PVP, Cypher; Darbepoetin alfa, darusentan, dasatinib, denosumab, desloratadine, dexosome vaccine (lung cancer), dexrazoxane, dextromethorphan/quinidine sulfate, duloxetine hydrochloride; ED-71, eel calcitonin, efalizumab, entecavir, etoricoxib; Falciparum merozoite protein-1/AS02A, fenretinide, fondaparinux sodium; gamma-Hydroxybutyrate sodium, gefitinib, ghrelin (human); hLM609; Icatibant acetate, imatinib mesylate, ipsapirone, irofulven; LBH-589, LE-AON, levocetirizine, LY-450139; Malaria vaccine, mapatumumab, motexafin gadolinium, muraglitazar, mycophenolic acid sodium salt; nab-paclitaxel, nelarabine; O6-Benzylguanine, olmesartan medoxomil, orbofiban acetate; Panitumumab, peginterferon alfa-2a, peginterferon alfa-2b, pemetrexed disodium, peptide YY3-36, pleconaril, prasterone, pregabalin; Ranolazine, rebimastat, recombinant malaria vaccine, rosuvastatin calcium; SQN-400; Taxus, tegaserod maleate, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, teriparatide, troxacitabine; Valganciclovir hydrochloride, Val-Tyr sardine peptidase, VNP-40101M, vorinostat.

Clinical Trials as Topic↗
PubMed2006

Gateways to clinical trials.

Gateways to Clinical Trials are a guide to the most recent clinical trials in current literature and congresses. The data the following tables have been retrieved from the Clinical Trials Knowledge Area of Prous Science Integrity, the drug discovery and development portal, http://integrity.prous.com. This issues focuses on the following selection of drugs: (-)-Epigallocatechin gallate, (-)-gossypol, 2-deoxyglucose, 3,4-DAP, 7-monohydroxyethylrutoside; Ad5CMV-p53, adalimumab, adefovir dipivoxil, ADH-1, alemtuzumab, aliskiren fumarate, alvocidib hydrochloride, aminolevulinic acid hydrochloride, aminolevulinic acid methyl ester, amrubicin hydrochloride, AN-152, anakinra, anecortave acetate, antiasthma herbal medicine intervention, AP-12009, AP-23573, apaziquone, aprinocarsen sodium, AR-C126532, AR-H065522, aripiprazole, armodafinil, arzoxifene hydrochloride, atazanavir sulfate, atilmotin, atomoxetine hydrochloride, atorvastatin, avanafil, azimilide hydrochloride; Bevacizumab, biphasic insulin aspart, BMS-214662, BN-83495, bortezomib, bosentan, botulinum toxin type B; Caspofungin acetate, cetuximab, chrysin, ciclesonide, clevudine, clofarabine, clopidogrel, CNF-1010, CNTO-328, CP-751871, CX-717, Cypher; Dapoxetine hydrochloride, darifenacin hydrobromide, dasatinib, deferasirox, dextofisopam, dextromethorphan/quinidine sulfate, diclofenac, dronedarone hydrochloride, drotrecogin alfa (activated), duloxetine hydrochloride, dutasteride; Edaravone, efaproxiral sodium, emtricitabine, entecavir, eplerenone, epratuzumab, erlotinib hydrochloride, escitalopram oxalate, etoricoxib, ezetimibe, ezetimibe/simvastatin; Finrozole, fipamezole hydrochloride, fondaparinux sodium, fulvestrant; Gabapentin enacarbil, gaboxadol, gefitinib, gestodene, ghrelin (human); Human insulin, human papillomavirus vaccine; Imatinib mesylate, immunoglobulin intravenous (human), indiplon, insulin detemir, insulin glargine, insulin glulisine, intranasal insulin, istradefylline, i.v. gamma-globulin, ivabradine hydrochloride, ixabepilone; LA-419, lacosamide, landiolol, lanthanum carbonate, lidocaine/prilocaine, liposomal cisplatin, lutropin alfa; Matuzumab, MBP(82-98), mecasermin, MGCD-0103, MMR-V, morphine hydrochloride, mycophenolic acid sodium salt; Natalizumab, NCX-4016, neridronic acid, nesiritide, nilotinib, NSC-330507; O6-benzylguanine, olanzapine/fluoxetine hydrochloride, omalizumab; Panitumumab, parathyroid hormone (human recombinant), parecoxib sodium, PEG-filgrastim, peginterferon alfa-2a, peginterferon alfa-2b, pegvisomant, pemetrexed disodium, perospirone hydrochloride, pexelizumab, phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate, pneumococcal 7-valent conjugate vaccine, posaconazole, pramiconazole, prasugrel, pregabalin, prilocaine; rAAV-GAD65, raclopride, rasagiline mesilate, retapamulin, rosuvastatin calcium, rotigotine, rufinamide; SarCNU, SB-743921, SHL-749, sirolimus-eluting stent, sitaxsentan sodium, sorafenib; TachoSil, tadalafil, talampanel, Taxus, tegaserod maleate, telithromycin, telmisartan/hydrochlorothiazide, temsirolimus, tenatoprazole, teriflunomide, tetrathiomolybdate, ticilimumab, timcodar dimesilate, tipifarnib, tirapazamine, TPI, tramiprosate, trifluridine/TPI, trimethoprim; Ularitide, Urocortin 2; Valdecoxib, valganciclovir hydrochloride, valproate magnesium, valspodar, vardenafil hydrochloride hydrate, vitespen, vofopitant hydrochloride, volociximab, vorinostat; Yttrium 90 (90Y) ibritumomab tiuxetan; Ziprasidone hydrochloride, zotarolimus, zotarolimus-eluting stent.

Clinical Trials as Topic↗