Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Vaginal Rings”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2004

New delivery systems in contraception: vaginal rings.

Vaginal rings, made of soft flexible silicone rubber, for delivery of contraceptive hormones are currently gaining clinical acceptance. This method provides extended release of hormones, which are implanted in the core of the ring and slowly disseminate into vaginal tissue. Although formulations and sizes vary, most rings are approximately 58 mm in diameter with a cross-section of 8.4 mm. Depending on the type of ring used, prolonged hormone release may occur from 3 weeks to 1 year. Advantages of the vaginal ring method are that it is user controlled, does not interfere with intercourse, does not require daily intake of a pill, and allows continuous delivery of a low dose of steroids. The Population Council has developed a progesterone-releasing ring, which is currently on the market in Chile and Peru for contraception in breastfeeding women. This ring may be effective for progesterone therapy during in vitro fertilization as well. A contraceptive ring releasing very low doses of the potent progestin Nestorone (Population Council, New York, NY) for 6 to 12 months is also under investigation. The optimal ring formulations, however, contain hormone combinations that provide excellent contraceptive efficacy with few side effects and good control of menstrual bleeding. The Food and Drug Administration has recently approved Organon's monthly ring releasing etonogestrel and ethinyl estradiol. The Population Council is developing a 1-year contraceptive ring releasing low doses of Nestorone and ethinyl estradiol. Combination rings are associated with very low pregnancy rates and side effects consistent with those of oral contraceptives.

Contraceptive Devices, Female↗
PubMed1992

Progesterone-releasing vaginal rings for use in postpartum contraception. I. In vitro release rates of progesterone from core-loaded rings.

Vaginal rings of Dow Corning 382 Silastic polymer, having identical outside dimensions, were fabricated to contain cores of different diameters loaded with 25% w/w progesterone. Elution of rings was carried out in continuously flowing baths of isotonic saline at 37 degrees C and quantities of progesterone released in 24 h periods measured for up to 128 days. Release of the steroid was shown to be a membrane diffusion-controlled process, modified by the development of a gradually increasing zone of depletion at the core surface. Rings of a suitable core diameter were selected to give initial release of 5 mg/24 h progesterone and sterile batches of these rings, prepared for WHO-sponsored clinical studies in post-partum, lactating women, were shown to give highly consistent and reproducible rates of in vitro drug delivery. A comparison was made with the in vitro release rates of rings containing a homogeneous dispersion of progesterone.

Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid↗
PubMed2005

Endometrial and vaginal effects of low-dose estradiol delivered by vaginal ring or vaginal tablet.

AIMS: The major aims of the study were to compare the safety of a continuous low-dose estradiol-releasing vaginal ring (ESTring) to that of a vaginal estradiol tablet (Vagifem) on the endometrium and the relief of subjective symptoms and signs of urogenital estrogen deficiency. Quality of life and acceptability of treatment delivery were also assessed. STUDY DESIGN: A prospective, randomized study in which women were assigned in a 2:1 ratio to ESTring and Vagifem and followed for 12 months. The primary endpoint was endometrial safety, based on the results of ultrasound measurement of endometrial thickness and a progestogen challenge test at baseline and week 48. Efficacy was determined by subjective assessment of urogenital estrogen deficiency symptoms at baseline and weeks 3, 12, 24, 36 and 48 and assessment of signs of vaginal epithelial atrophy by the clinician at baseline, 12 and 48 weeks. In addition, pelvic floor strength, vaginal cytological evaluation and pH, bacteruria and patient acceptability were assessed. Quality of life was assessed using a menopause-specific quality-of-life questionnaire and a 2-day bladder diary at baseline and 12 and 48 weeks. The comparability of the two groups was assessed using ANOVA, chi2 or Fisher's exact tests. RESULTS: A total of 126 women were randomized to ESTring and 59 to Vagifem. There was no statistical difference between the groups in the alleviation of symptoms and signs of urogenital estrogen deficiency. Maturation indices increased in both groups, from generally atrophic at baseline to proliferative or highly proliferative at 48 weeks. After 48 weeks of treatment, there was no statistically significant difference in endometrial thickness between the two groups. A statistically smaller proportion of bleeding/spotting occurred in the ESTring group (n = 0) compared to the Vagifem users (n = 4). Estradiol and total estrone serum levels increased during treatment in both groups but remained within the normal postmenopausal range. General health status in both groups was unchanged but the urogenital component of health burden was significantly improved in both groups. Bladder diary variables showed no differences between treatment groups. CONCLUSION: Equivalent endometrial safety and efficacy in the relief of the symptoms and signs of urogenital estrogen deficiency were demonstrated for the 12 months' use of a low-dose estradiol-releasing vaginal ring and a vaginal estradiol tablet.

Administration, Intravaginal↗
PubMed1997

Transdermal estrogen with a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device for climacteric complaints versus estradiol-releasing vaginal ring with a vaginal progesterone suppository: clinical and endometrial responses.

OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to compare the effects of a new estradiol-releasing vaginal ring with progesterone given as a vaginal suppository, versus the efficacy, safety and acceptability of an intrauterine device releasing levonorgestrel combined with estradiol, delivered transdermally from a patch. Climacteric symptoms, bleeding pattern and endometrial histologic features were studied. METHODS: Fifty six parous, postmenopausal women with urogenital symptoms were allocated in two groups for one year: 28 women receiving estradiol by a vaginal ring and a 100 mg vaginal progesterone suppository 7 days every month and 28 women receiving a continuous transdermal daily dose of 50 micrograms of estradiol with a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine device inserted. All the patients were subjected to vaginosonographic examination followed by thorough pathological examination of the uterine curetting samples. RESULTS: A mean endometrial thickness (double layer) of 2.9 and 3.0 mm, respectively, was found to be predictive of normal endometrium. Both treatment regiments effectively relieved climacteric symptoms. Endometrial proliferation was not observed. Spotting was more common in the intrauterine device group than in the vaginal ring group. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of urogenital symptoms in postmenopausal women with these two forms of hormone replacement therapy is shown to be an effective and safe method, exhibiting advantages over other methods of treatment.

Administration, Cutaneous↗
PubMed1983

Effects of contraceptive vaginal ring treatment on vaginal bacteriology and cytology.

The presence of aerobic and anaerobic bacteria, yeasts and mycoplasma/ureaplasma was investigated in seventeen women before and after six months use of a contraceptive vaginal ring releasing levo-Norgestrel and estradiol and in 16 women using an oral contraceptive containing levo-Norgestrel and ethinylestradiol. Apart from an increase in yeasts in both groups, no significant changes in the vaginal bacteriology could be found. Vaginal smears were examined before and during treatment for up to two years in a group of 120 women participating in a clinical trial of the contraceptive vaginal ring. No changes in the squamous epithelium or cylinder cells were found. The amount of leucocytes increased in the smears. The results indicate that use of the contraceptive vaginal ring does not affect the bacterial ecology of the vagina. The increase in leucocytes indicates a weak inflammatory reaction which might explain the increase in vaginal discharge often observed by women using the contraceptive vaginal ring.

Bacteria↗
PubMed1994

A comparative multicenter study of the effects of continuous low-dose estradiol released from a new vaginal ring versus estriol vaginal pessaries in postmenopausal women with symptoms and signs of urogenital atrophy.

OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to study the efficacy, safety, and acceptability of a new estradiol-releasing (6.5 to 9.5 micrograms per 24 hours) silicone rubber vaginal ring compared with Ovesterin 0.5 mg estriol vaginal pessaries. STUDY DESIGN: Gynecologic clinical status, vaginal pH, cytologic characteristics, and occurrence of bacteriuria were determined before starting and after 3 and 12 weeks of treatment in 146 postmenopausal women. RESULTS: Both treatments alleviated the subjective and objective symptoms of estrogen deficiency excellently, and both were equally effective at restoring the vaginal pH to levels normally seen in fertile women (< 5.5). Vaginal cytologic studies showed a significant difference in maturation value in favor of the estradiol-releasing silicone rubber vaginal ring, as measured by the pathologist's assessment of the proliferation of the vaginal mucosa. A total of 77% of users were classified as responders, compared with 39% in the pessary group. Both treatments were well accepted. The administration of the pessary was associated with a significantly higher (p < 0.001) incidence of discomfort than that of the ring, which was given better (p < 0.001) rating by the patients at the 12-week visit. A strong preference (p < 0.001) for the ring was shown by patients with previous experience with pessaries. CONCLUSION: Treatment of urogenital symptoms in postmenopausal women with an estradiol-releasing vaginal ring is shown to be an effective and safe method, exhibiting advantages over treatment with estriol vaginal pessaries.

Administration, Intravaginal↗
PubMed2000

Oestradiol-releasing vaginal ring versus oestriol vaginal pessaries in the treatment of bothersome lower urinary tract symptoms.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the efficacy of an oestradiol-releasing vaginal ring and oestriol pessaries in the alleviation of lower urinary tract symptoms occurring after the menopause. DESIGN: Randomised, parallel group, controlled trial. SETTING: Twenty-six clinics of practising gynaecologists and one outpatient clinic at a department of obstetrics and gynaecology. POPULATION: Two hundred and fifty-one postmenopausal women, with a mean age of 66 years, reporting at least one bothersome lower urinary tract symptom. METHODS: One hundred and thirty-four women were treated with the oestradiol-releasing ring for 24 weeks; 117 women were treated with oestriol pessaries 0.5 mg every second day for 24 weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Subjective scores of urgency, frequency, nocturia, dysuria, stress incontinence and urge incontinence. RESULTS: The two treatments were equally efficacious in alleviating urinary urgency (51% vs 56%), urge incontinence (58% vs 58%), stress incontinence (53% vs 59%) and nocturia (51% vs 54%). Dysuria was alleviated in 76% vs 67%, equivalence was not demonstrated. No statistically significant difference was found for any primary efficacy endpoint. Sixty percent of the participants rated the form of administration via the vaginal ring as excellent, compared with 14% for the pessaries (P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Low dose vaginally administered oestradiol and oestriol are equally efficacious in alleviating lower urinary tract symptoms which appear after the menopause. The form of administration of the vaginal ring, seems to be more acceptable than oestriol pessaries.

Administration, Intravaginal↗
PubMed1997

Continuous low dose estradiol released from a vaginal ring versus estriol vaginal cream for urogenital atrophy.

OBJECTIVES: To determine if the efficacy of continuous low dose estradiol released from a vaginal ring is equivalent to estriol vaginal cream regarding improvement of the patient's subjective feeling of vaginal dryness and to determine if there is a preference for either of the two study treatments. METHODS: Open-label randomized parallel group trial with active control with a blind evaluation of vaginal cytology and with a cross-over (change-over) phase for preference comparison. One hundred and sixty five postmenopausal women with symptoms of vaginal dryness and signs of vaginal atrophy were randomized to an estradiol ring (Estring) or estriol cream (Synapause). The duration of each treatment period was 12 weeks. RESULTS: Both study treatments were equally effective regarding the ability to alleviate the symptom feeling of vaginal dryness and the signs of vaginal atrophy. Both treatments were efficient in restoring the vaginal mucosa, recorded as higher maturation values and as decreased vaginal pH. Estring was superior to estriol cream regarding preference of treatment. Both treatments were equivalent for the occurrence of adverse events, including bleeding. CONCLUSION: data from this change-over study confirm efficacy and safety of both the vaginal ring and cream in the treatment of postmenopausal women with urogenital atrophy symptoms and signs. The patients had a strong preference for the vaginal ring.

Administration, Intravaginal↗
PubMed1999

Local treatment of urogenital atrophy with an estradiol-releasing vaginal ring: a comparative and a placebo-controlled multicenter study. Vaginal Ring Study Group.

Local estrogen substitution has been shown to be more appropriate than any systemic application for the treatment of urogenital symptoms of hormone deficiency. The efficacy, safety and acceptability of a new low-dose drug delivery system consisting of an estradiol-releasing silicone vaginal ring was studied in two multicenter trials. In an open-label comparative trial a total of 219 postmenopausal women were randomized to the estradiol-releasing vaginal ring or to estriol suppositories. In terms of efficacy both treatment arms were shown to be equivalent; however, significantly higher rates of acceptability were found for the vaginal ring. In a double-blinded placebo-controlled study a total of 84 patients were randomized to either treatment arm for a period of 24 weeks. The statistically significant improvement of the vaginal epithelial pH and maturation values demonstrated the efficacy of the estradiol-releasing vaginal ring compared to the placebo ring.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Contraceptive vaginal rings.

Contraceptive vaginal rings (CVRs) contain sex steroids that diffuse through a plastic polymer ring at a constant rate and are absorbed directly through the vaginal epithelium into the systemic circulation. This delivery system provides many advantages over oral contraceptives (OCs), including avoidance of the first-pass effect through the liver, constant serum steroid levels, longer duration of use, and greater bioavailability of the hormones. CVRs containing progestin only are designed for continuous use for 3 to 6 months. Those containing progesterone alone are indicated for use in women who are breastfeeding. Large clinical trials of progestin-containing CVRs demonstrated good efficacy and safety of the CVR, with continuation rates similar to that of OCs. CVRs containing a combination of estrogen and progestin are designed to be used for 1 to 12 months in a cyclic manner similar to OCs, with withdrawal bleeding in the fourth week of each cycle. In clinical trials these CVRs have typical use efficacies similar to OCs, with an acceptable pattern of bleeding.

Administration, Intravaginal↗
PubMed1996

A comparative study of safety and efficacy of continuous low dose oestradiol released from a vaginal ring compared with conjugated equine oestrogen vaginal cream in the treatment of postmenopausal urogenital atrophy.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the safety, efficacy and acceptability of a continuous low dose oestradiol releasing vaginal ring with conjugated equine oestrogen vaginal cream in the treatment of postmenopausal urogenital atrophy. DESIGN: An open, parallel, comparative multicentre trial. SETTING: Sydney and Melbourne, Australia. PARTICIPANTS AND INTERVENTIONS: One hundred and ninety-four postmenopausal women with symptoms and signs of urogenital atrophy were randomised on a 2:1 basis to 12 weeks of treatment with an oestrogen vaginal ring versus an oestrogen cream. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES AND RESULTS: Equivalence (95% CI) was demonstrated between the two treatments for relief of vaginal dryness and dyspareunia, resolution of atrophic signs, improvement in vaginal mucosal maturation indices and reduction in vaginal pH. No significant difference was demonstrated in endometrial response to a progestogen challenge test and equivalence was demonstrated in the incidence of intercurrent bleeding episodes. The vaginal ring was significantly more acceptable than the cream P < 0.0001), and was preferred to the cream (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: With equivalent efficacy and safety and superior acceptability to vaginal cream, the low dose oestradiol vaginal ring is an advance in vaginal delivery systems for the treatment of urogenital atrophy.

Administration, Intravaginal↗
PubMed2000

Vaginal epithelial surface appearances in women using vaginal rings for contraception.

Vaginal inspections using colposcopy before insertion of contraceptive vaginal rings and at 2-month intervals during ring use were conducted on 169 users of four different formulations. The rings studied released Nestorone alone (50, 75, 100 g daily over 6 months); ethinyl estradiol: Nestorone (30:100 and 15:150 g daily over 6 months); ethinylestradiol:norethindrone acetate (20:1000 and 15:1000 g daily over 4 months); and ethinyl estradiol:norethindrone acetate (20:1000 g daily over 12 months). A total of 88 altered or atypical conditions of the vaginal surface appearance were recorded in 507 inspections (17.4% of inspections). Many of these atypical appearances were quite subtle. The incidence was significantly higher (p <0.01) than in the single pretreatment examinations (11 in 158 inspections; 7.0%), but closely matched that of a "control group" of sexually active women who were the subject of an earlier study by the same investigators. In that study, the incidence was 18% (57 atypical conditions in 317 inspections). In all, 83% of atypical conditions identified in the vagina during ring use had disappeared by the next scheduled colposcopy despite continued ring use. Findings of potential significance were conservatively defined as all ulcerations, those abrasions and ecchymoses that were >0.5 cm in any direction, and fields of five or more petechiae. Findings fitting those criteria comprised 30% of atypical conditions in ring users, 33% in the control group, and 27% pretreatment. The corresponding incidence as a percentage of inspections were 5.3%, 6. 0%, and 2.5% in the ring users, control groups, and pretreatment groups, respectively. These differences were not statistically significant. The findings suggest that the vaginal rings included in the studies contributed little, if at all, to clinically significant lesions or to total lesion incidence. Further definition would require a larger and longer-term study with matched controls.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1981

The effect of a contraceptive vaginal ring and oral contraceptives on the vaginal flora.

Premenopausal women seeking a steroid contraceptive method were allowed to choose between a contraceptive vaginal ring (CVR) containing levonorgestrel and estradiol used in a 3-week in, 1-week out regimen (n=20) and an oral contraceptive (OC) containing levonorgestrel and ethinyl estradiol in a 28-day regimen (n = 10). Cultures from the posterior vaginal fornix were obtained before therapy in both groups and monthly for 6 months for the CVR group and after 1, 3, and 6 months for the OC group. These cultures were streaked on specific media to provide quantitative aerobic and anaerobic, lactobacillus, Candida sp., Gardnerella vaginalis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae counts in micro-organisms per milliliter. A comparison of the number and types of organisms isolated from vaginal cultures obtained initially and at 6 months demonstrated no statistically significant differences in colony counts between CVR and OC users. The results of this study suggest that the use of the CVR is not associated with a greater growth of pathogens than is oral administration of a progestin and estrogen combination.

Adult↗
PubMed1991

Coping with extra Poisson variability in the analysis of factors influencing vaginal ring expulsions.

The vaginal ring is one method of contraception currently under investigation and development by the Human Reproduction Programme of WHO. One factor that reduces its acceptability is that some women experience involuntary expulsions of the ring. WHO have collected prospective data on 1005 women from 19 centres worldwide to investigate various aspects of ring use including factors that might affect expulsions. For each subject the data include number of expulsions, age, parity, ponderal index, number of days of ring use and health care centre. To model the factors influencing expulsion, the number of expulsions was first considered as a Poisson variate with mean directly proportional to the log of the duration of ring use. Such a model gave a poor description of the data and it appeared that the number of expulsions was considerably over-dispersed for an assumed Poisson variate. This paper examines a variety of strategies for coping with the resulting lack of fit of the model. It turns out that a truncated Poisson model gives a better description of the expulsion data and that health care centre and parity influence the rates.

Contraceptive Devices, Female↗
PubMed1999

Efficacy, bleeding patterns, and side effects of a 1-year contraceptive vaginal ring.

A combined contraceptive vaginal ring designed to last 12 months was tested at three clinic sites. This ring released approximately 1 mg of norethindrone acetate (NET-Ac) and 20 micrograms of ethinyl estradiol (EE) daily. A total of 60 women were enrolled to use the ring in a schedule of 3 weeks in/1 week out. Serum norethindrone (NET) and ethinyl estradiol (EE) levels were assayed twice weekly in cycles 6, 9, and 13. Mean NET concentrations between cycles 6 and 9 were relatively stable between 13 and 19 nmol/L but showed a 10%-21% decrease in all centers between cycles 9 and 13. Mean EE concentrations ranged from 75 to 103 pmol/L, but did not have the same decrease as NET between cycles 9 and 13. Cycles with progesterone peaks (> 9.6 nmol/L) compatible with some luteal activity occurred in 4% of cycles sampled in Sydney, 3% in Santo Domingo, and 26% in Los Angeles. Half of these cycles exhibited at least one progesterone value > 32 nmol/L with three of 18 occurring in noncompliant cycles. Heavier body weight was associated with increased probability of luteal activity. Based on serum estradiol peaks > 400 pmol/L, eight of 81 cycles appeared to have marked follicular activity with no luteal activity. No pregnancies occurred. Nausea was reported by about half the subjects in approximately 10% of the visits (mainly in the first 1-2 days in the first cycle immediately after ring insertion). Vomiting was reported by 20% of subjects early in the first cycle only. Headache was reported on occasion by nearly 50% of the women, but the relationship to ring use was uncertain. Vaginal discharge was reported by 17 women (82% of these were from one clinic). Of 60 women, 14 discontinued before completing the study, but only two discontinuations were for medical reasons. Small but statistically significant changes occurred in lipid levels in two of the three centers. All changes remained within normal limits and were similar to those seen with many oral contraceptives. It appears that this ring may perform slightly differently in different populations, but is a highly satisfactory method of contraception for many women. Minor modifications in design could provide higher levels of steroid release and in the later months of the ring life span would assure continuing high levels of contraceptive protection for heavier women.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2004

Superior cycle control with a contraceptive vaginal ring compared with an oral contraceptive containing 30 microg ethinylestradiol and 150 microg levonorgestrel: a randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: This trial was conducted to compare cycle control with vaginal ring a combined contraceptive vaginal ring, and a combined oral contraceptive (COC) delivering 30 mug ethinylestradiol (EE) and 150 mug levonorgestrel. METHODS: This open-label, randomized, multi-centre, Phase III study involved adult women from 11 countries. Subjects were treated with either vaginal ring or a COC for 13 cycles (12 months). RESULTS: A total of 1030 subjects (vaginal ring, n=512; COC, n=518) comprised the intention-to-treat (ITT) population. The percentage of women in the ITT population who completed the trial was 70.9% for vaginal ring and 71.2% for the COC group. The incidence of breakthrough bleeding and spotting over cycles 2-13, the primary efficacy parameter, was lower with vaginal ring (range 2.0-6.4%) than the COC (range 3.5-12.6%), and for cycles 2 and 9 the lower incidence with vaginal ring was confirmed as statistically significant (P=0.003 and P=0.002 respectively). The incidence of intended bleeding was significantly higher over all cycles with vaginal ring (58.8-72.8%) than with the COC (43.4-57.9%). CONCLUSIONS: Cycle control with vaginal ring was excellent and superior to that of a COC containing 30 mug EE.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Prospective randomized trial to evaluate the efficacy of a vaginal ring releasing progesterone for IVF and oocyte donation.

A polysyloxane vaginal ring containing 1g of natural progesterone was developed as luteal supplementation for women treated with IVF-embryo transfer and for agonadal women participating in an oocyte donation programme. The ring provides continuous release of progesterone (10-20 nmol/l) for 90 days. The efficacy of this form of progesterone supplementation was evaluated in two multicentre prospective randomized trials. IVF-embryo transfer trial: After oocyte aspiration, 505 women were randomly allocated to progesterone supplementation with vaginal ring or i.m. progesterone (50 mg/day). The clinical pregnancy rate was 36.6% in both groups. Implantation rate was 15.9% in the vaginal ring and 16.0% in i.m. progesterone. Oocyte donation trial: After endometrial proliferation with micronized oestradiol, 153 women were allocated to progesterone replacement with a vaginal ring or i.m. progesterone (100 mg/day). Clinical pregnancy rate was 39.8 and 28.6% respectively. Implantation rate was significantly higher with the vaginal ring compared with i.m. progesterone (19.9 and 11.6% respectively, P = 0.006). The vaginal ring is a novel development which provides continuous release of progesterone for 90 days. In IVF-embryo transfer, its effectiveness is similar to daily i.m. injections. In oocyte donation the ring provides a progestative milieu which improves the implantation rate and eliminates the discomfort of daily i.m. injections.

Adult↗