Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Vacuum Aspiration”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2001

Comparing the acceptability of manual vacuum aspiration and electric vacuum aspiration as methods of early abortion.

OBJECTIVE: to compare the acceptability of manual vacuum aspiration (MVA) and electric vacuum aspiration (EVA) as methods of early (< or = 77 days' gestation) abortion. METHODS: We interviewed 42 women who had been randomly assigned to either MVA or EVA and compared their perceptions of the two procedures. RESULTS: The experiences and perceptions of women in the two groups were similar in many ways. The majority of women in both procedure groups were very satisfied with the method used, and most indicated that they would prefer the same method if they were to have another abortion. CONCLUSION: This study found no major differences in the acceptability of MVA and EVA among women undergoing early abortions.

Abortion, Induced↗
PubMed2003

Similarities in women's perceptions and acceptability of manual vacuum aspiration and electric vacuum aspiration for first trimester abortion.

This paper examines women's acceptability of and experiences with manual vacuum aspiration (MVA) as compared with electric vacuum aspiration (EVA) for first trimester abortion. Women requesting pregnancy terminations were randomly assigned to either MVA (n = 64) or EVA (n = 63). Participants completed questionnaires before and after their abortions and approximately 2-4 weeks later. We observed some differences by group in participants' ratings of the importance of method characteristics and in their perceptions of their abortion methods after their abortions. The two groups did not, however, differ in their reports of pain, anxiety or bleeding or in the acceptability of their method.

Abortion, Induced↗
PubMed2001

The usefulness of the modified extra-oral vacuum aspirator (EOVA) from household vacuum cleaner in reducing bacteria in dental aerosols.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: Currently, as a preventive measure against air contamination caused by dental procedures, dust-collecting aspirators such as an extra-oral vacuum aspirator (EOVA) are coming into general use. In this study, we tested the ability of a modified EOVA that uses a household vacuum machine. DESIGN AND SETTING: The study was conducted in two parts. First, the modified EOVA was tested for its ability to eliminate an Escherichia coli aerosol generated in a manikin. Second, the device was tested for its ability to remove the aerosol generated by dental treatment procedures, scaling and drilling a tooth, on human subjects. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant reduction in both the E. coli aerosol and the oral bacterial aerosol during dental treatment procedures. CONCLUSION: The modified EOVA machine is highly effective in preventing air contamination by dental procedures. Its main advantages are that it can easily be modified for use with any dental unit and it is relatively inexpensive.

Aerosols↗
PubMed2003

Treating incomplete abortion in El Salvador: cost savings with manual vacuum aspiration.

When manual vacuum aspiration (MVA) was introduced to treat incomplete abortion at a regional training hospital in El Salvador, this study evaluated the impact of replacing sharp curettage with MVA. Hospital cost, length of hospital stay, complication rates and postabortion contraceptive acceptance were compared in a prospective, nonrandomized, controlled study of 154 women assigned to either traditional sharp curettage services or MVA services plus contraceptive counseling. Assignment depended on availability of trained providers. Compared to sharp curettage, use of MVA and associated changes in protocol led to a significant cost savings of 13% and shorter hospital stay of 28%. Dedicated family-planning counseling resulted in a threefold higher rate of contraceptive acceptance. Although the difference in cost was significant, much higher savings could be realized if minimal postoperative stays were implemented for both procedures. Barriers to early discharge include patient expectations, physician attitudes and training and hospital systems administration.

Abortion, Incomplete↗
PubMed1976

Early termination of pregnancy: a comparative study of intrauterine prostaglandin F2alpha and vacuum aspiration.

The relative safety and effectiveness of vacuum aspiration and the intrauterine administration of 5 mg PGF2alpha for terminating pregnancies within two weeks of a missed menstrual period were evaluated in a study where subjects were randomly assigned to procedures; 100 patients were aborted with vacuum aspiration and 100 patients were aborted with PGF2alpha. All PGF2alpha-treated patients were premedicated with meperidine, diazepam and atropine. Complications were infrequent with either of the procedures. Vomiting occurred more frequently during the PGF procedure (30.0%) than during the vaccum aspiration procedure (9.0%). The intrauterine instillation of PGF2alpha successfully terminated all pregnancies. One patient continued to be pregnant after the vacuum aspiration procedure. Based on the results of this study both study procedures appeared to be safe and effective for terminating early first trimester pregnancies.

Abortion, Induced↗
PubMed2005

A randomized trial of misoprostol compared with manual vacuum aspiration for incomplete abortion.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the safety, efficacy, and acceptability of misoprostol and manual vacuum aspiration for the treatment of incomplete abortion in a hospital setting in Kampala, Uganda. METHODS: Three hundred seventeen women with clinically diagnosed incomplete first-trimester abortions were randomized to treatment with either manual vacuum aspiration or 600 mug misoprostol orally to complete their abortions. All women received antibiotics posttreatment and were followed up 1-2 weeks later. RESULTS: Regardless of treatment allocation, nearly all women in this study successfully completed their abortions with either oral misoprostol or manual vacuum aspiration (96.3% versus 91.5%, relative risk 1.05, 95% confidence interval 0.98-1.14). Complications were less frequent in those receiving misoprostol than those having manual vacuum aspiration (0.9% versus 9.8%, relative risk 0.1, 95% confidence interval 0.01-0.78). In the 6 hours after treatment, women using misoprostol reported heavier bleeding but lower levels of pain than those treated with manual vacuum aspiration. Rates of acceptability were similarly high among women in the 2 treatment groups, with 94.2% and 94.7% of women reporting that their treatment was satisfactory or very satisfactory in the misoprostol and manual vacuum aspiration groups, respectively. CONCLUSION: For treatment of first-trimester uncomplicated incomplete abortion, both manual vacuum aspiration and 600 microg oral misoprostol are safe, effective, and acceptable treatments. Based on availability of each method and the wishes of individual women, either option may be presented to women for the treatment of incomplete abortion. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: I.

Abortifacient Agents, Nonsteroidal↗
PubMed2003

Manual vacuum aspiration for second-trimester pregnancy termination.

OBJECTIVES: To compare manual and electric vacuum aspiration for surgical abortions between 14 and 18 weeks of pregnancy. METHODS: A consecutive case series of pregnant women presenting to Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center for abortion. There were 73 women in the manual vacuum aspiration group and 37 women in the electric vacuum aspiration group. Dilatation and evacuation was performed using manual or electric vacuum aspiration according to protocol. Procedure time was assessed with the t-test. RESULTS: In all cases, abortion was performed with initial vacuum. Group sizes were sufficient to detect a 20% difference in mean procedure time with 80% power (calculated with two separate S.D.s for procedure time). There was no significant difference in procedure time between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Manual vacuum aspiration can be safely and effectively used in second-trimester abortion procedures and should be more widely investigated for this purpose.

Abortion, Induced↗
PubMed1989

The clinical significance of the genital microbiologic flora at vacuum aspiration following miscarriage.

85 women undergoing vacuum aspiration following miscarriage were studied. At the time of vacuum aspiration, immunofluorescent stainings for detection of C. trachomatis proved positive in 5.9% of the patients. Group B streptococci were isolated in 7.5%, coliforms in 3.5%, and Gardnerella vaginalis in 51% of the patients. The overall frequency of postabortal pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) was 3.5%, whereas 40% of chlamydia-positive women contracted postabortal PID (p less than 0.05). No significant relation between other microorganisms and postabortal PID was observed. The duration of postabortal bleeding was unrelated to the genital microbiologic flora. Based on anamnestic information about previous pregnancies and duration of preoperative bleeding it was possible to define subgroups at risk of harboring C. trachomatis and coliforms. The clinical significance of this is unknown.

Abortion, Spontaneous↗
PubMed1996

Effects of aspiration vacuum and needle diameter on cumulus oocyte complex morphology and developmental capacity of bovine oocytes.

The effects of aspiration vacuum and needle diameter on the morphology of the cumulusoocyte-complex (COC) and developmental capacity of the oocyte after IVF was studied in 2 experiments using a disposable ovum pick-up needle guidance system whose construction permits its use in vitro. In Experiment 1, the relationship was determined between the aspiration vacuum, expressed in millimetre of mercury, and the actual amount of water aspirated by the system, expressed in millilitre per minute. In Experiment 2, five different levels of aspiration vacuum for 3 different needle diameters (18g, 19g and 21g) were tested in slaughterhouse ovaries. The cumulus-oocyte complexes (COCs) were divided into 3 categories: 1) oocytes with a compact cumulus, 2) oocytes with an expanded cumulus and 3) naked oocytes. The results show that a change of needle diameter can triple the amount of fluid actually aspirated. The highest oocyte recovery rates are obtained when using the thickest needle (18-g), regardless of the aspiration vacuum. On the average, for all needle types, more oocytes are recovered at the highest aspiration vacuum. For all needle diameters, the proportion of oocytes surrounded by a compact cumulus decreases progressively as the vacuum increases. Regardless of the vacuum applied, thinner needles result in a higher proportion of recovered COCs with a compact cumulus. At a high aspiration vacuum, naked oocytes become predominant regardless of the needle diameter. The prevalence of blastocysts, expressed in proportion to the recovered COCs, decreases as the aspiration vacuum increases, being especially noticeable between 70 and 130 mm Hg.

Journal Article↗
PubMed2006

Intrauterine adhesions after manual vacuum aspiration for early pregnancy failure.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the occurrence of intrauterine adhesions after manual vacuum aspiration for early pregnancy failure. DESIGN: Case series. SETTING: Tertiary care center. PATIENT(S): Three women with intrauterine adhesions after manual vacuum aspiration for the treatment of early pregnancy failure. INTERVENTION(S): Chart review. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Hysteroscopic diagnosis of intrauterine adhesions after manual vacuum aspiration. RESULT(S): Three cases of symptomatic intrauterine adhesions after manual vacuum aspiration. CONCLUSION(S): Intrauterine adhesion formation may follow manual vacuum aspiration for early pregnancy loss.

Abortion, Spontaneous↗
PubMed2001

Mifepristone: new preparation. Avoids or facilitates cervical dilatation before vacuum aspiration of pregnancy.

(1) Cervical softening with prostaglandins or laminaria before vacuum aspiration of pregnancy can avoid or facilitate mechanical dilatation. (2) Mifepristone is now licensed in France for cervical softening before vacuum aspiration of pregnancy. (3) The clinical file on mifepristone in this indication contains data from about 20 comparative clinical trials using surrogate end points, namely the need for and/or ease of cervical dilatation. (4) In these trials the cervix was easier to dilate in women who received mifepristone than in women who received a placebo. (5) A few comparative trials showed comparable efficacy of prostaglandins, laminaria (small hydrophilic stents inserted into the cervix that gradually swell, leading to cervical dilatation) and mifepristone in this indication. (6) Before vacuum aspiration, metrorrhagia occurred more frequently in women on mifepristone than in those on a placebo. Blood losses during vacuum aspiration were comparable in women who had received prostaglandins and those who had received mifepristone. (7) The incidence of abdominal pain may be lower on mifepristone than with laminaria or prostaglandins.

Abortifacient Agents, Nonsteroidal↗
PubMed2003

An evaluation of manual vacuum aspiration instruments.

OBJECTIVES: Manual vacuum aspiration (MVA) instruments vary in quality, cost, and availability. This evaluation of MVA instruments was conducted to provide decision-makers with information to assist them in determining which instruments to purchase for their specific health care settings. METHODS: Nine MVA devices were evaluated for durability, quality, safety, and usability. Study data came from device specifications, laboratory-based technical studies, and field evaluations. RESULTS: Equipment durability is compromised by high temperatures, quality is compromised by manufacturing defects, and design is key to safe reuse. All MVA instructions are written at advanced reading levels, and device assembly was difficult for most study participants. CONCLUSIONS: No single brand of MVA instrument is perfectly suited for every setting. Users can evaluate the appropriateness of MVA instrument characteristics by reviewing the elements assessed in this evaluation, which, by complementing the experience of administrators and clinicians, should enable them to determine which MVA is best for their environment.

Abortion, Induced↗
PubMed2004

Manual versus electric vacuum aspiration for early first-trimester abortion: a controlled study of complication rates.

OBJECTIVE: Manual vacuum aspiration is an alternative to electric suction curettage for first-trimester elective abortion. Although many studies have demonstrated that manual vacuum aspiration is safer than sharp curettage for abortion, only a few studies have directly compared it with electric suction curettage. These studies proved the methods to be equally effective and acceptable but were too small to adequately compare safety. We compared immediate complication rates for abortions performed by manual and electric vacuum aspiration. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis of all women undergoing elective abortion at up to 10 weeks' gestation at San Francisco General Hospital over a 3.5-year period. A total of 1726 procedures were included: 1002 manual and 724 electric vacuum aspirations. Clinical data were collected from medical records. Rates of uterine reaspiration and other immediate complications occurring at our institution were compared. RESULTS: We found no difference in the rate of uterine reaspiration after abortions performed with the manual or electric suction device (2.2% versus 1.7%, respectively, P =.43). We had 80% statistical power to detect a 2% difference in uterine reaspiration rates with an microa error of.05. Overall major complication rates were 2.5% with manual and 2.1% with electric suction curettage, P =.56. Multivariable regression analyses controlling for potential confounders showed no difference in uterine reaspiration rates (electric odds ratio [OR] = 0.71, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.32, 1.6) or overall complications (electric OR = 0.81, 95% CI 0.40, 1.7). CONCLUSION: Manual vacuum aspiration is as safe as electric suction curettage for abortions at up to 10 weeks' gestation. Expanded use in an office setting might increase abortion access.

Abortion, Induced↗
PubMed2004

Manual vacuum aspiration (MVA) in the management of first trimester pregnancy loss.

BACKGROUND: Manual vacuum aspiration is not widely used for the evacuation of retained products of conception in western Europe despite its well-proven success and safety record. Nor is there much information about its use under intravenous (systemic) analgesia or patient-controlled anaesthesia in modern settings. AIM: To evaluate the use of manual vacuum aspiration for the evacuation of retained products of conception under systemic analgesia or patient-controlled anaesthesia in the management of first trimester miscarriages. METHODS: Fifty-eight women with a diagnosis of first trimester miscarriage (42 missed and 16 incomplete miscarriages) were treated with manual vacuum aspiration under systemic analgesia or patient-controlled anaesthesia. Success rates and patient satisfaction and acceptability were recorded. RESULTS: Of the 58 women recruited, 42 underwent the procedure under systemic analgesia and 15 under patient-controlled sedation while 1 woman opted for general anaesthesia. Successful evacuation was achieved in all cases. Both analgesic methods were associated with high levels of patient satisfaction and acceptability. CONCLUSIONS: Manual vacuum aspiration is an option in the management of all first trimester pregnancy losses. Comparisons with other treatment options are indicated.

Abortion, Habitual↗
PubMed1995

Oral misoprostol versus vaginal gemeprost for cervical dilatation prior to vacuum aspiration in women in the sixth to twelfth week of gestation.

The effectiveness of oral misoprostol versus vaginal gemeprost for cervical dilatation prior to vacuum aspiration was compared in women in the 6th to 12th week of pregnancy. Sixty-four nulliparous women requesting termination of pregnancy between 6th to 12th weeks of gestation were randomized to receive either 400 micrograms misoprostol orally or 1 mg vaginal gemeprost at 12 hr or 3 hr prior to vacuum aspiration, respectively. The cervical dilatation at vacuum aspiration, the ease of the subsequent surgical procedure, and the incidence of complications and side effects were compared between these two methods of cervical priming. The median cervical dilatation at vacuum aspiration in the misoprostol group was significantly greater than that in the gemeprost group (8.0 mm versus 7.0 mm, p < 0.02). Preoperative side effects were significantly less frequent in the misoprostol group (p < 0.01). The ease of dilatation assessed subjectively by the operating surgeons was also improved significantly in the misoprostol group (p < 0.01). However, the duration of operation and blood loss were similar in both groups. Since misoprostol is also much cheaper and more convenient to use, we conclude that oral misoprostol is better than vaginal gemeprost for cervical dilatation prior to vacuum aspiration in first trimester pregnancy.

Abortifacient Agents, Nonsteroidal↗
PubMed1993

Comparison of medical abortion with surgical vacuum aspiration: women's preferences and acceptability of treatment.

OBJECTIVES: To assess women's preferences for, and the acceptability of, medical abortion and vacuum aspiration in the early first trimester. DESIGN: Patient centred, partially randomised trial. Medical abortion was performed with mifepristone 600 mg followed 48 hours later by gemeprost 1 mg vaginal pessary. Vacuum aspiration was performed under general anaesthesia. SETTING: Teaching hospital in Scotland. PATIENTS: 363 women undergoing legal induced abortion at less than nine weeks' gestation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Women's preferences for method of abortion before abortion; acceptability judged two weeks after abortion by recording the method women would opt to undergo in future and by semantic differential rating technique. RESULTS: 73 (20%) women preferred to undergo medical abortion, and 95 (26%) vacuum aspiration; 195 (54%) were willing to undergo either method, and were allocated at random. Both procedures were highly acceptable to women with preferences. Gestation had a definite effect on acceptability in randomised women; at less than 50 days there were no differences, but between 50 and 63 days vacuum aspiration was significantly more acceptable. CONCLUSIONS: Women who wish to use a particular method should be allowed their choice, regardless of gestation. Women of 50-63 days' gestation without preferences for a particular method are likely to find vacuum aspiration more acceptable. A patient centred, partially randomised trial design may be a useful tool in pragmatic research.

Abortifacient Agents, Nonsteroidal↗
PubMed2004

Paracervical block in incomplete abortion using manual vacuum aspiration: randomized clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the effectiveness of paracervical block in controlling pain among women treated with manual vacuum aspiration for an incomplete abortion METHODS: A randomized clinical trial was conducted at Nuestra Señora de Altagracia, a maternal and perinatal referral hospital in the Dominican Republic. The sample size was based on a clinical difference of 1.5 points in the level of pain measured with the visual analog scale using 90% power and a sampling error of 0.04. Women who were at 12 weeks of gestation or less with an incomplete abortion were eligible to participate. They were randomly assigned to receive either the standard treatment of care (manual vacuum aspiration for uterine evacuation with psychological support but no paracervical block) or manual vacuum aspiration treatment with psychological support and paracervical block using 1.0% lidocaine. Patients with active infections, severe illnesses, psychiatric disorders, or allergies to lidocaine were excluded. Intraoperative pain as reported by the women and as documented by an external observer was measured. RESULTS: Although the paracervical block technique used showed a slight reduction in severe pain, there were no clinically or statistically significant differences in intraoperative pain between the 2 groups (relative risk 0.73; 95% confidence interval 0.43, 1.23) with 50% of all patients registering 7 or higher score on a visual analog pain scale of 0-10. However, statistically significant differences were found in each group when comparing the level of preoperative and intraoperative pain described by the patient (P <.001). The manual vacuum aspiration technique and the paracervical block were not accompanied by complications. CONCLUSION: The paracervical block technique used in this study along with psychological support was comparable with pain control using psychological support alone; neither pain management regimen provided sufficient pain control. It is recommended that randomized comparative studies be designed to determine the effectiveness of other paracervical block techniques and the efficacy of the use of analgesics in patients suffering from incomplete abortion treated with manual vacuum aspiration.

Abortion, Incomplete↗
PubMed1990

Assessment of the manual vacuum aspiration (MVA) equipment in the management of incomplete abortion.

In a study to assess the efficacy of and safety of vacuum aspiration syringe in the management of incomplete abortion 300 patients with non septic abortion were evacuated by the method in the ward. A control group 285 patients was evacuated in theatre by sharp currettage. All patients were followed up for 21 days. 54.7% of the study patients were evacuated without any need for analgesia while all the control patients were given intravenous pethidine and valium. 2.3% of vacuum aspiration and 3.5% of control patients needed revacuation (p greater than 0.05). 70.3% of vacuum aspiration cases were dry by day 7 compared to 64.6% of the control group (p greater than 0.05). Immediate complications of nausea and vomiting were seen in 5.3% study patients (p less than 0.001). There was one uterine perforation in the control group. 5.4% of study and 6.0 of control patients developed mild to severe sepsis (p greater than 0.05). Vacuum aspiration is a safe, simple and quick method of treating incomplete abortion. Its wider use in developing countries is highly recommended.

Abortion, Incomplete↗