Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “VENTRICULOGRAPHY”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1998

[Determination of ejection fraction and left ventricular fraction using isotopic ventriculography and bidimensional echocardiography. Comparison with contrast ventriculography].

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to determine the correlation and agreement between the values of left ventricular ejection fraction and volumes assessed by echocardiography and radionuclide ventriculography with the results obtained by contrast angiography, as well as the variability of each method in these measurements. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a group of 59 patients with a first acute myocardial infarction we have determined left ventricular ejection fraction and volumes by two-dimensional echocardiography, equilibrium radionuclide ventriculography and contrast angiography initially and six months after myocardial infarction. We also assess the variability in the determinations in these three methods. RESULTS: We found significant correlations in ejection fraction and volumes by radionuclide ventriculography and echocardiography with contrast angiography. The correlation was higher in ejection fraction and end-systolic volume by radionuclide ventriculography (r = 0.88 and r = 0.73) than by echocardiography (r = 0.55 and r = 0.63; p < 0.01), whereas the correlation of end-diastolic volume was moderate by both methods (r = 0.58 and r = 0.47), without significant differences. The agreement between contrast angiography and radionuclide ventriculography was higher, with narrower limits of agreement than between contrast angiography and echocardiography in ejection fraction as well as in ventricular volumes. We have found high and significant correlations between two determinations by each method in all parameters, although they were higher in ejection fraction by contrast angiography (r = 0.96) and radionuclide ventriculography (r = 0.98) than by echocardiography (r = 0.70; p < 0.01). The limits of agreement were always wider in echocardiography, narrower in contrast angiography and the narrowest in radionuclide ventriculography, showing its superior reproducibility. CONCLUSIONS: In this group of myocardial infarction patients, the variability in the measurements was lower by radionuclide ventriculography than by echocardiography, this could be the reason for overall better results found in correlation and agreement between radionuclide ventriculography and contrast angiography than between echocardiography and contrast angiography in the assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction and volumes.

Adult↗
PubMed1983

A comparison of conventional contrast ventriculography and digital subtraction ventriculography.

We studied 46 patients with a history of transmural myocardial infarction or angiographic evidence of coronary artery stenosis with both conventional contrast ventriculography and digital subtraction ventriculography from May to September 1982. Urografin 76, 30 ml, was administered at a flow rate of 18 ml/s, by means of a catheter in the superior vena cava during digital subtraction ventriculography (DSV). Results of the latter were compared with conventional contrast ventriculograms. The correlation coefficient was r =0.938 (p less than 0.001) for determination of ejection fraction with both methods. The data in individual cases suggest that DSV is more sensitive than conventional contrast ventriculography in determination of severely reduced ejection fractions. The methods are practically identical in qualitative evaluation of disorders of regional wall motion in the anterolateral region, while DSV is more sensitive than conventional ventriculography in evaluating the apical region. Sensitivity was 85.7% when the two methods were compared in evaluation of the inferior region of the left ventricle. Both methods are identical in demonstration of severely deformed ventricles. Digital subtraction ventriculography may replace conventional contrast ventriculography in some of the situations discussed above.

Adult↗
PubMed1983

Comparison of digital intravenous ventriculography with direct left ventriculography for quantitation of left ventricular volumes and ejection fractions.

Digital images of the left ventricle obtained at 30 frames/second from continuous fluoroscopy after intravenous injection of contrast medium (digital intravenous ventriculography) were used to estimate left ventricular (LV) volumes and ejection fraction with use of several techniques for identifying the ventriculographic silhouette. The digital technique was compared with direct contrast left ventriculography in 26 patients undergoing diagnostic cardiac catheterization. End-diastolic and end-systolic volumes calculated from digital intravenous and direct left ventriculograms were obtained with use of a standard area-length formula. Both end-diastolic volume (EDV) (r = 0.88, y = 1.06x - 17.1 ml) and end-systolic volume (ESV) (r = 0.89, y = 0.96x + 0.43 ml) determined from digital intravenous ventriculography (mask mode images) correlated closely with those obtained by direct left ventriculography. Combining the EDV and ESV to define the relation between the 2 techniques yielded an even closer correlation (r = 0.96). There was also good correlation between the 2 techniques for measurement of ejection fraction (r = 0.81, standard error of the estimate 6.7%). Measurements from direct left ventriculography were frequently invalidated by ventricular arrhythmias during the time of opacification of the left ventricle; this was rarely the case for digital intravenous ventriculography. It is concluded that area-length estimates of LV volumes and ejection fraction can be accurately obtained from digital processing of fluoroscopic LV images after intravenous injection of contrast medium.

Arrhythmias, Cardiac↗
PubMed1986

[Comparison of left ventricular end-diastolic volume determined by radionuclide ventriculography, by contrast-media ventriculography and by a geometry-independent method].

Ejection fraction and end-diastolic volume (EDV) are valuable parameters of left ventricular function. They can be measured by radionuclide ventriculography. This study examines EDV in comparison to two other methods. A comparison was made between EDV derived from radionuclide ventriculography (RNV), standard contrast ventriculography and a 'hybrid' method, which calculates EDV from ejection fraction, heart rate and thermodilution cardiac output. Two groups of patients were examined: 54 patients with various cardiac diseases by contrast and radionuclide ventriculography (RNV); and 18 patients with typical angina were examined by RNV at rest and during exercise three times: Control without medication, 20 minutes after 10 mg metoprolol i.v. and again 10 minutes after the second exercise and 10 mg isosorbide dinitrate sublingually. In comparison to contrast ventriculography RNV overestimated EDV by 27%, and in comparison to the hybrid method by 11% with satisfactory linearity. The extent of error increases with decrease of ventricular volume. The assumption that the two short axes of the left ventricle are equally long causes one quarter of total error. Errors caused by the algorithm delineating the borders of the left ventricle cannot be measured. For clinical purposes radionuclide ventricular EDV seems to yield satisfactory results.

Cineangiography↗
PubMed1993

[The diagnosis of ventricular pseudoaneurysms. The complementary role of echocardiography, isotopic ventriculography and contrast ventriculography].

The diagnostic yield of echocardiography, radionuclide ventriculography (first pass and multiple gated) and contrast ventriculography was evaluated in 11 patients in whom a diagnosis of left ventricular pseudoaneurysm had been made during the last ten years. The diagnosis was made by two dimensional echocardiography (associated with Doppler in the last 5 patients) in 8 of 11 patients (sensitivity: 73%). The major limitation of the technique, in addition to the impossibility of an adequate recording due to a suboptimal acoustic window, is the poor definition of the neck of the pseudoaneurysm, particularly in the inferior localization. By contrast, echocardiography is the only technique which permits the direct visualization of thrombi within the pseudoaneurysm. Multiple gated radionuclide ventriculography was diagnostic in 7 of 10 patients (sensitivity: 70%). Its major limitations are the poorer spatial resolution to visualize the pseudoaneurysm neck and the thrombi within the cavity. First pass radionuclide ventriculography was diagnostic in 4 of 6 patients (sensitivity: 67%). In one of them it improved on the diagnostic yield of the multiple gated technique. Contrast ventriculography was diagnostic in 5 of 7 patients (sensitivity: 71%). The diagnosis was missed due to technical problems in one patient and to significant thrombosis within the pseudoaneurysm in another. Thus, none of the imaging studies has optimal sensitivity. Therefore, all play a complementary role in the diagnosis of ventricular pseudoaneurysm.

Aged↗
PubMed1984

Comparison of digital and radionuclide left ventriculography in patients at risk from conventional left ventriculography.

In this study, two alternative methods of assessing left ventricular (LV) sequential wall motion and ejection fraction (EF) were used in 28 consecutive patients in whom an unstable clinical condition (unstable angina pectoris or severe LV dysfunction) precluded the use of high volume contrast cineventriculography. A new approach, direct small volume contrast digital ventriculography, was compared to radionuclide blood pool ventriculography considered as a "standard" and reliable technique. The qualitative analysis of regional LV contraction by three independent observers showed a complete agreement in 64% of segments studied in the left anterior oblique (LAO) projection and in 69% in the right anterior oblique (RAO) projection; a one-degree disagreement was observed in 13% and 19% respectively, and a discrepancy of two degrees or more in 23% and 12% respectively. Left ventricular ejection fraction calculated from both techniques correlated relatively well (r = 0.82). The radionuclide examination still remains the fastest, easiest and most objective way to appraise global LV function in high risk patients. However, optimal analysis of segmental wall motion requires invasive digital contrast left ventriculography. In future, a more general use of non-ionic contrast media including their intravenous injection and the advent of portable digital devices should permit their widespread use as a safe, rapid and reliable procedure even in the intensive care unit.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Contrast harmonic color Doppler left ventriculography: machine-interpreted left ventricular ejection fraction compared with equilibrium-gated radionuclide ventriculography.

BACKGROUND: Multi-gated acquisition (equilibrium-gated radionuclide ventriculography) (MUGA) is considered the gold standard for measuring left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) because it is accurate, machine interpreted, and reproducible. Echocardiographic LVEF measurements are subject to variability in image acquisition and interpretation and to the limitations of 2-dimensional (2D) versus 3-dimensional imaging. GOAL: The shortcomings of traditional echocardiography may be addressed by combining multiplane 2D harmonic imaging, echocardiographic contrast, color Doppler ultrasonography, and digital image processing to create a new imaging modality: contrast harmonic color Doppler left ventriculography. METHODS: We compared the accuracy of a new method for measuring LVEF that allows for machine interpretation and uses contrast-enhanced intermittent harmonic color Doppler ultrasonography (CHCD). Quantitative LVEF measurements by hand-traced harmonic 2D echocardiography, contrast-enhanced harmonic 2D echocardiography, CHCD, and machine-interpreted CHCD were compared with MUGA in 35 patients. RESULTS: Contrast-enhanced intermittent harmonic color Doppler provided images with vivid endocardial definition in all patients, but hand-traced harmonic 2D echocardiography and contrast-enhanced harmonic 2D echocardiography had inadequate images in 9% of patients. The MUGA LVEF range was 0. 09 to 0.70. All echocardiographic methods showed excellent correlation with the MUGA LVEF (R (2) > 0.96), but the CHCD method had the best limits of agreement. CONCLUSIONS: Contrast-enhanced intermittent harmonic color Doppler LVEF correlates with MUGA at least as well as traditional noncontrasted echocardiography, but it provides diagnostic images in a greater proportion of patients. The CHCD images have vivid endocardial delineation and can be machine interpreted.

Adult↗
PubMed1987

Reproducibility and reliability of first pass radionuclide ventriculography with Au-195m. Validation of Au-195m radionuclide ventriculography.

Au-195m is a radio-isotope with an ultra-short half-life with which multiple sequential evaluations of ventricular function can be made. In order to evaluate the reliability and reproducibility of analyses of overall and regional ventricular function by radio-isotope ventriculography with Au-195m we studied 10 healthy volunteers and 12 patients with coronary artery disease. Each subject underwent 4 first-pass studies: 1 with Tc-99m and, 10 minutes later, 3 with Au-195m (2 basal studies separated by 3-5 minutes interval and, 10 minutes later, 1 after s.l. nitroglycerin administration). Regional wall motion was analyzed and ejection fraction and peak count rate were determined in each test. Our study showed that the ejection fraction obtained with Au-195m was reproducible (r = 0.98) and correlated well with the ejection fraction determined by using Tc-99m (r = 0.98). The values of the peak count rate obtained with Tc-99m were higher than those obtained with Au-195m. Due to the specially designed collimator and the technical characteristics of the gamma-camera we used, we were able to record sufficiently high count-rates to evaluate regional wall motion, and this analysis was also found to be reliable and reproducible. After s.l. nitroglycerin administration, normal volunteers showed a significant increase of ejection fraction in comparison with basal acquisitions (p less than 0.05), while a wide range of responses was observed in the group of patients with coronary artery disease. We conclude that radio-isotope ventriculography with Au-195m is reliable and reproducible and could be a valid method of monitoring rapid variations induced in overall and regional left ventricular function.

Adult↗
PubMed1993

Improved detection of abnormal left ventricular wall motion using tomographic radionuclide ventriculography compared with planar radionuclide and single plane contrast ventriculography.

Tomographic radionuclide ventriculography is a technique which could have major advantages over conventional planar imaging, such as better assessment of ventricular wall motion abnormalities. This possibility was therefore investigated in 100 consecutive patients undergoing routine cardiac catheterization. Following angiography, planar blood pool images were conventionally acquired and tomographic imaging performed using the Aberdeen Section Scanner. All derived wall motion data were subsequently analysed in an objective and blinded manner. The mean age was 56 (range 33-71) and 79% were male. 67 patients had experienced prior myocardial infarction, 27 were categorized as having significant and six insignificant coronary artery disease. The detection rates for patients with prior myocardial infarction were 95% for angiography, 57% for planar imaging and 90% for tomography. Even taking patients with only prior anterior myocardial infarction, the detection rates were 94%, 63% and 91% respectively. For those residual patients with significant coronary artery disease, the rates were 7%, 0% and 59% respectively. Overall for the detection of patients with significant coronary artery disease, the sensitivity was 70%, 40% and 81% respectively. Patients with insignificant coronary artery disease did not demonstrate any abnormalities using any method. These results demonstrate that tomography and angiography have similar detection rates in the presence of significant coronary artery disease and both are superior to planar imaging.

Adult↗
PubMed1980

Segmental wall-motion analysis in the right anterior oblique projection: comparison of exercise equilibrium radionuclide ventriculography and exercise contrast ventriculography.

Thirty-nine patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease were studied at rest and during supine bicycle exercise with radionuclide and contrast left ventriculography. Analysis of regional wall motion was made by visual evaluation of the five standard 30 degrees right anterior oblique (RAO) wall segments in the contrast images and the corresponding 10 degrees RAO radionuclide segments. The radionuclide studies were evaluated independently by three observers using a five-point grading system. The interobserver wall-motion grading agreed completely in more than 80% of segments at rest and exercise, and agreed within one wall-motion grade in more than 95% of segments. The comparison of wall-motion grades between radionuclide and contrast ventriculograms showed complete agreement in 86% of segments at rest and in 78% during exercise, and agreement within one wall-motion grade in 97% of rest and 96% of exercise segments. Visual evaluation of 10 degrees RAO rest and exercise radionuclide ventriculograms compares favorably with rest and exercise 30 degrees RAO contrast ventriculograms and demonstrates satisfactory interobserver agreement.

Coronary Disease↗
PubMed1989

Dipyridamole radionuclide ventriculography: a test with high specificity for severe coronary artery disease.

Ventricular dysfunction induced by dipyridamole would be evidence of myocardial ischemia in patients with limited ability to undergo standard exercise testing. Radionuclide ventriculography before and after intravenous dipyridamole infusion was compared with the results of exercise radionuclide ventriculography in a prospective study of 31 patients undergoing coronary angiography. Among these patients, 21 (68%) had significant coronary artery disease (greater than or equal to 50% stenosis), 19 (61%) had severe coronary disease (greater than or equal to 70% stenosis) and 10 (32%) were "normal" (less than 50% stenosis). The left ventricular ejection fraction was calculated, and regional wall motion was scored on a 6 unit scale. In the normal patients, the ejection fraction (+/- SEM) increased 5.6 +/- 2% (units) during exercise and 7.9 +/- 1 units after dipyridamole (both p less than or equal to 0.004 compared with that during rest). However, in patients with coronary artery disease, the ejection fraction failed to increase during exercise or after dipyridamole. In the patients with coronary artery disease, regional wall motion decreased by 4.1 +/- 0.5 units during exercise (p less than 0.003) and by 1.8 units after dipyridamole (p less than 0.02). Receiver operating characteristic analysis demonstrated general comparability between the sensitivity and specificity of exercise and dipyridamole ventriculography, with "optimal" operating points that favored choosing high sensitivity for the former and high specificity for the latter. Specific subsets of patients with severe coronary atherosclerosis were analyzed with use of these criteria. In patients with severe stenosis (greater than or equal to 70%), the sensitivity of dipyridamole ventriculography was 67% compared with 89% for exercise ventriculography. However, at these levels of sensitivity, the specificity of dipyridamole ventriculography was 92% compared with 67% for exercise ventriculography. In this and other subsets of patients, the specificity of dipyridamole ventriculography exceeded that of exercise ventriculography. Thus, it is concluded that dipyridamole radionuclide ventriculography is moderately sensitive and highly specific for detecting severe coronary atherosclerosis. This technique provides a widely applicable, useful alternative to exercise ventriculography in the diagnosis of coronary atherosclerosis in patients who have limited exercise tolerance.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Detection of residual wall motion after myocardial infarction by gated technetium-99m tetrofosmin SPET: a comparison with contrast ventriculography.

The differentiation of residual viability from necrotic myocardium in patients with a prior myocardial infarction is important when deciding whether revascularization is indicated. Myocardial viability can be assessed by studying perfusion and regional wall motion. Gated single-photon emission tomography (SPET) imaging allows the simultaneous assessment of perfusion and function through a single study. The aim of this study was to analyse the concordance between wall motion score derived by gated SPET and by contrast ventriculography. Furthermore, the agreement between myocardial perfusion and regional myocardial wall motion was analysed for both techniques. We studied a homogeneous group of 26 consecutive patients with a prior myocardial infarction, using both gated technetium-99m tetrofosmin SPET and contrast ventriculography. A seven-segment model of the left ventricle was employed to score regional myocardial wall motion on images obtained with gated SPET and contrast ventriculography using a four-point scale. Contrast ventriculography was performed within 2 weeks of the gated SPET study. Prevalence of abnormal wall motion (akinetic or dyskinetic) was 24/182 (13%) for gated SPET and 25/182 (14%) for contrast ventriculography (P = NS). There was a high agreement (80%) in wall motion score between gated SPET and contrast ventriculography (kappa = 0.67, P < 0.001). The agreement was better in segments with normal or mild to moderate hypoperfusion (82%, kappa = 0.69) than in those with severe hypoperfusion (67%, kappa = 0.56). The agreement between myocardial perfusion and myocardial wall motion was 89% (162/182), kappa = 0.57, for gated SPET and 80% (145/182), kappa = 0.21, for contrast ventriculography. The relation between the summed wall motion scores per patient on gated SPET and contrast ventriculography was excellent (y = 0.81x + 2.9, r = 0.82, P < 0.01). Thirteen (43%) out of 30 segments with severely diminished or no myocardial perfusion showed normal or hypokinetic wall motion on gated SPET, suggesting residual myocardial viability in malperfused regions. Our results suggest that gated SPET imaging is a reliable tool for the assessment of regional wall motion in post-myocardial infarction patients. Furthermore, in patients with a previous myocardial infarction, gated SPET imaging has the potential to detect preserved wall motion in regions with fixed perfusion defects, which might be indicative of residual myocardial viability.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Comparison of left ventricular ejection fraction and volumes in heart failure by echocardiography, radionuclide ventriculography and cardiovascular magnetic resonance; are they interchangeable?

AIMS: To prospectively compare the agreement of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction by M-mode echocardiography (echo), 2D echo, radionuclide ventriculography and cardiovascular magnetic resonance performed in patients with chronic stable heart failure. It is important to know whether the results of each technique are interchangable, and thereby how the results of large studies in heart failure utilizing one technique can be applied using another. Some studies have compared cardiovascular magnetic resonance with echo or radionuclude ventriculography but few contain patients with heart failure and none have compared these techniques with the current fast breath-hold acquisition cardiovascular magnetic resonance. METHODS AND RESULTS: Fifty two patients with chronic stable heart failure taking part in the CHRISTMAS Study, underwent M-mode echo, 2D echo, radionuclude ventriculography and cardiovascular magnetic resonance within 4 weeks. The scans were analysed independently in blinded fashion by a single investigator at three core laboratories. Of the echocardiograms, 86% had sufficient image quality to obtain left ventricular ejection fraction by M-mode method, but only 69% by 2D Simpson's biplane analysis. All 52 patients tolerated the radionuclude ventriculography and cardiovascular magnetic resonance, and all these scans were analysable. The mean left ventricular ejection fraction by M-mode cube method was 39+/-16% and 29+/-15% by Teichholz M-mode method. The mean left ventricular ejection fraction by 2D echo Simpson's biplane was 31+/-10%, by radionuclude ventriculography was 24+/-9% and by cardiovascular magnetic resonance was 30+/-11. All the mean left ventricular ejection fractions by each technique were significantly different from all other techniques (P<0.001), except for cardiovascular magnetic resonance ejection fraction and 2D echo ejection fraction by Simpson's rule (P=0.23). The Bland-Altman limits of agreement encompassing four standard deviations was widest for both cardiovascular magnetic resonance vs cube M-mode echo and cardiovascular magnetic resonance vs Teichholz M-mode echo at 66% each, and was 58% for radionuclude ventriculography vs cube M-mode echo, 44% for cardiovascular magnetic resonance vs Simpson's 2D echo, 39% for radionuclide ventriculography vs Simpson's 2D echo, and smallest at 31% for cardiovascular magnetic resonance-radionuclide ventriculography. Similarly, the end-diastolic volume and end-systolic volume by 2D echo and cardiovascular magnetic resonance revealed wide limits of agreement (52 ml to 216 ml and 11 ml to 188 ml, respectively). CONCLUSION: These results suggest that ejection fraction measurements by various techniques are not interchangeable. The conclusions and recommendations of research studies in heart failure should therefore be interpreted in the context of locally available techniques. In addition, there are very wide variances in volumes and ejection fraction between techniques, which are most marked in comparisons using echocardiography. This suggests that cardiovascular magnetic resonance is the preferred technique for volume and ejection fraction estimation in heart failure patients, because of its 3D approach for non-symmetric ventricles and superior image quality.

Echocardiography↗
PubMed1985

Tomographic gated blood pool radionuclide ventriculography: analysis of wall motion and left ventricular volumes in patients with coronary artery disease.

The use of planar radionuclide ventriculography to evaluate global and segmental ventricular function is limited by the superimposition of structures in some projections and the gross segmental resolution of the planar technique. Preliminary reports have suggested the feasibility of tomographic gated radionuclide ventriculography with rotating detector systems. This study tested the hypotheses that 1) tomographic radionuclide ventriculography detects segmental dysfunction at rest not identified with multiview planar studies and single plane contrast ventriculography, and 2) ventricular volumes and ejection fraction calculated from these studies provide data similar to those obtained with angiography and planar radionuclide ventriculography. Gated blood pool tomograms were acquired over 180 degrees at 15 frames per cardiac cycle during the initial 90% of the cardiac cycle. Compared with the multiview planar technique tomographic ventriculography showed an increased sensitivity for detecting left ventricular segments with significant coronary artery stenosis (97 versus 74%, p less than 0.025) without any loss in specificity. Compared with both planar radionuclide and contrast ventriculography, tomographic radionuclide ventriculography also detected more noninfarcted left ventricular segments supplied by stenosed coronary arteries (81 versus 39 and 32%, respectively, p less than 0.01). Tomographic radionuclide ventriculographic measurements of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction showed close correlations with angiographic and planar radionuclide determinations. Gated blood pool tomography is a sensitive method for the evaluation of segmental wall motion and an accurate method for the measurement of global left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction.

Adult↗