Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Utilization Review”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1975

Emphasizing "level of care" over "length of stay" in hospital utilization review.

Utilization review has heretofore emphasized "length of stay" as the criterion for deciding when the patient is ready to leave the hospital. We suggest that "level of care" (the type, number, and/or intensity of a combination of physician, skilled nursing, and ancillary services) received by the patient should replace length of stay as the major "decision" criterion for deciding on continued hospitalization: "appropriate hospital placement" means the patient is currently receiving a level of care available only in the hospital. Length of stay should be the criterion for signaling intervals when patients are (re) reviewed to determine the currently needed level of care. Explicit criteria for determining when a patient is receiving a hospital level of care should be developed. Explicit criteria will increase objectivity, provide guidance to utilization review coordinators, and assist the hospital in defending its utilization review decisions to an intermediary or Professional Standards Review Organization (PSRO). Level of care will be reflected in a patient's "service profile," a listing of all the services being received by the patient on any given day of hospitalization. The services profile varies throughout hospitalization; hospitalization is appropriate when a patient's current services profile constitutes a level of care available only in the hospital.

Delivery of Health Care↗
PubMed1979

Utilization review and containment for hospital utilization: some implications of providing care in the "most appropriate setting".

The study examines the potential for savings in the use of hospital resources if utilization review policies succeed in curtailing excessive use of hospital facilities. Excessive use is defined as the utilization of hospital care when ambulatory care is medically feasible and acceptable. A utilization review policy would be expected to counteract the tendency to substitute inpatient for outpatient treatment by assuring that all patients with identical medical problems and demographic traits would be treated in an identical least cost setting regardless of their social and economic circumstances. It might, thus, ascertain that the use of hospital facilities would not be systematically affected by patients' non-medical or socioeconomic characteristics. Specifically, the study distinguishes between two types of utilization control policies, pre-admission certification and concurrent or continuing-stay review of hospital episodes, and asks how each can contain excessive utilization. It concludes that continuing-stay review is not likely to have any appreciable effect on shortening hospital episodes because the effects of nonmedical factors on extended stay are small and concentrated among patients whose diagnoses might not qualify them for hospitalization under a pre-admission screen. However, pre-admission certification has a considerable potential for containment of hospital utilization through the reduction in the number of admissions. Also, as a corollary, the study shows that utilization review policies should not be evaluated, as they often are, in terms of their effect on length-of-stay, but rather in terms of their effects on hospital admissions and case mix.

Analysis of Variance↗
PubMed1979

Jefferson Medical College Student Model Utilization Review Committee.

A Student Model Utilization Review Committee Project is in progress at Jefferson Medical College. Students participate in the program for 90 minutes during the six weeks of their clerkship in family medicine at the university hospital. Information collected from participants and controls before and after the program indicates that the experimental group has greater knowledge and more positive attitudes about utilization review and cost control in the health care field than do the controls. Students express positive feelings about the program. More importantly, one year later, as seniors, those in the experimental group demonstrated clinical behavior which was more consistent with the objectives of the program than other students. These results have led the Department of Family Medicine to incorporate the utilization review program into its formal curriculum beginning in the 1979-1980 academic year.

Cost Control↗
PubMed1991

[A utilization review program of cefoxitin].

A drug utilization review program of cefoxitin was conducted in a 714-bed teaching hospital. Health records of all 43 in-patients who received cefoxitin during the month of November 1987 were reviewed retrospectively. The use of cefoxitin (47 courses) was evaluated on the basis of "appropriate use" criteria developed from the literature and the physician's clinical experience. Of the 47 courses evaluated, cefoxitin was prescribed for prophylaxis in 47%, and its use was considered inappropriate in 86% of these. Overall, 66% of total cefoxitin usage was deemed inappropriate in this hospital. The cost associated with inappropriate use was estimated at $2672 for the period of the study. Corrective measures were then implemented to rectify the identified problems. A second study was conducted 2 years later to assess the impact of the corrective measures. This utilization review program of cefoxitin showed that optimal use of a drug requires not only close collaboration between pharmacists and physicians but a continuous and not a sporadic process of surveillance of the prescription for the drug being studied.

Bacterial Infections↗
PubMed1977

Cost, utilization, and utilization review of mental health services in a prepaid group practice plan.

The author describes the utilization review process, utilization patterns, and service cost of the Mental Health Service of the Health Insurance Plan of Greater New York (HIP). He finds that a mental health care delivery system within a health maintenance organization offers the advantages of sophisticated utilization review procedures, reduced cost per mental health incident, and a low utilization rate and low cost for psychiatric hospitalization. However, the HMO's return-to-function treatment goals may be too limited for the minority of patients who would benefit only from long-term intensive treatment. He recommends that cost accounting be based on cost per illness rather than cost per service.

Accounting↗
PubMed1976

Automated utilization review is timely, accurate, efficient.

Federal utilization review regulations require that hospitals establish admission and extended stay certification processes and conduct medical care evaluation studies. The computerized review system in use at Deaconess Hospital, St. Louis, has satisfied these regulations with minimum expenditure of time, effort, and money while insuring maximum accuracy and timeliness and consistency of reporting.

Computers↗
PubMed1978

The dynamics of utilization review: a case study of 44 Massachusetts hospitals.

Utilization review programs have existed on a national basis for over a decade, but relatively little is known about the patients who are scrutinized and what actions are taken to correct unnecessary use. In the fall of 1976, 44 of the 122 Massachusetts hospitals participated in a two-week in depth study of their utilization review activities. Over 22,000 admission and extended stay reviews were performed during this time period, and of these, 2,120 patients' continued stays in the hospital were questioned. In five admission review cases and 79 extended stay review cases, the UR committee formally terminated continued health insurance benefits, and in 12 admission reviews and 74 extended stay reviews, questioning by the UR committee led the attending physician to discharge the patient earlier than would have otherwise occurred. Ninety-four percent of the terminations occurred in Medicare patients and the median age of these patients exceeded 80 years. For medical patients, a disproportionate share of all those cases questioned and of those terminated occurred in chronic illness categories, such as cancer, heart failure, and organic brain syndromes. A higher than expected percentage of surgical cases questioned by the UR committee were in neurosurgical, cardiovascular and orthopedic procedure groups. The frequency with which UR committees identified and acted upon cases suggests that effective self-policing is occurring. A large portion of the utilization problem, however, may be related to the unavailability of appropriate sub-acute care for patients with chronic medical illness or surgical procedures which require long postoperative rehabilitation and recuperation.

Concurrent Review↗
PubMed1976

The effect of a target date based utilization review program on length of stay.

This study was conducted to determine whether implementation of a specific formalized concurrent utilization review system which involved making a prior determination of length of stay had any more effect on average length of stay than continuance of a utilization review method not involving assignment of such a target date. The system studied was the Pre-Discharge Utilization Review (PDUR) program used for Medicaid patients in Pennsylvania. Analysis was conducted using discharge abstracts for Medicaid patients under age 65 who were discharged with one of 14 common diagnoses for certain Allegheny County hospitals in 1972 and 1973. Comparisons were made for each individual diagnosis to control for possible differences in case mix. Results indicate that there was no general reduction in length of stay which could be attributed to the PDUR program.

Female↗
PubMed1992

Utilization review savings at the micro level.

Utilization review (UR) programs have become an integral part of efforts to contain health care costs for private health insurers, employers, and health care organizations. While some studies have measured the overall performance of these programs, important information in the prior level of the health care utilization has not been used in estimating the effectiveness of the program for micro units (e.g., employer groups). In this article, the authors present a model to determine how the impact of the hospital UR program on health care utilization for specific groups varies with historical use patterns. The estimation approach used in this article can be used to determine the effect of UR for specific employer groups without having to rely on the average effectiveness measures for all. Claims obtained from Aetna Health Plans provided data for more than 5,300 employer accounts covering approximately 580,000 employees, 44% of whom had the UR program sometime during the period 1987 to 1990. Because of regression to the mean, UR savings were greater for units with higher prior use and smaller for units with lower use. In addition to prior use, the size of the group also determined the extent of regression to the mean. Groups with smaller number of enrollees had greater potential to save from the UR because of UR's ability to reduce the outliers.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1975

Applying utilization review procedures in a community mental health center.

A large, multiservice community mental health center operates a utilization review program based on a three-level system of chart review by medical records personnel, a utilization review technician, and a committee of clinicians. Review is facilitated by a checklist for use in rating such issues as comprehensiveness, coordination, and quality of care aginst standards of care developed by the director of each service. The incompleteness of charts pulled for review is a continuing problem. But the system makes for efficient review and has various secondary benefits, such as the improvement of medical records. A survey made in the first year showed that staff had mixed feelings about the need for review, but that 60 per cent thought it was helpful all or most of the time.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗
PubMed1975

Utilization review of treatment for suicide attempters.

The authors describe an effort to develop criteria for utilization review of treatment for suicide attempters. Explicit criteria proposed by a panel of experts as essential determinants for hospitalization of these patients were compared with actual clinical practice. It was found that according to the experts' criteria (which were operationalized into rating assessments), over half of the outpatient sample should have been hospitalized. After multiple regression analysis was carried out on the criteria, however, four predictors showed that only 20 percent of the outpatients should have been hospitalized. The authors discuss the issues these findings raise about the criteria of the experts, their utility for research, their validity, and their implications for utilization review.

Decision Making↗
PubMed1976

The use of utilization review records as a source of data on nursing home care.

Data form the Utah nursing home Utilization Review Program, 1970-73, provide a description of the population of nursing home patients in Utah and changes over time in patient medication and measures of activity. These data are analyzed according to type of care in home: personal, intermediate, or comprehensive. The collection of data in utilization review programs can help to evaluate the quality of care as well as appropriateness of placement, provided the information collected is designed with these ends in mind.

Adult↗
PubMed1992

Utilization review. Emergency medicine implications.

The medical profession has made utilization review a priority in its efforts to limit health care expenditures. In emergency medicine this has ranged from initiatives to limit inappropriate emergency department visits to guidelines to limit emergency department testing and criteria to limit hospital admissions. The emergency department observation unit is an area in which the emergency physicians follow these practice guidelines without compromising patient care. The emergency department utilization review/quality assurance committee is a management tool by which emergency physicians monitor and implement these strategies for cost-effective patient care.

Clinical Laboratory Techniques↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Utilization review and management: a primer.

URM, HIS, HMRI, DRG's, CMG'S, RIW's, etc. At the fall 1990 National Congress on Utilization Review and Management in Edmonton, Dennis Psutka referred to these as "alphabet soup". It is probable that many front line managers find many of these terms and abbreviations confusing, if not overwhelming. Intended as a primer, this manuscript will: define the key terms and concepts in utilization review and management; explain their interrelationships; and discuss why it is important for nurse managers to understand and use them, as the entire health care system struggles to achieve more with fewer resources.

Abbreviations as Topic↗
PubMed1979

Utilization review and resident education.

The reasons for psychiatric hospitalization are not always taught clearly and formally to psychiatric residents; screening criteria employed in utilization review can be a tool for helping residents gather data and make decisions about the admission or continued stay of patients. On the admitting and inpatient units of the Payne Whitney Psychiatric Clinic, residents use sets of criteria for admission and for continued stay, with accompanying guidelines and clinical examples, as part of their training. The authros outline principles used in developing the criteria, including the belief that they should be applicable independent of diagnosis. They suggest that in a teaching hospital screening criteria should be taken as standards, and that they should be developed as part of the educational program and only then introduced into utilization review.

Decision Making↗
PubMed1975

Utilization review and suicide attempts. Exploring discrepancies between experts' criteria and clinical practice.

The discrepancies between experts' criteria for hospitalization of suicide attempters with actual clinical practice were explored to develop utilization review criteria which reflect current clinical thinking and which could form guidelines for the assessment of clinical care. Experts' criteria predicted that a hospitalized group of suicide attempters did not require hospitalization and that a nonhospitalized group of suicide attempters required hospitalization. Examination of the discrepancies between clinical practice and experts' criteria not only revealed that incorporation of clinical measures of depressive symptomatology could improve the experts' criteria for hospitalization but also showed that clinicians did not hospitalize a group of markedly symptomatic and socially impaired white suicide attempters. Clinician and patient factors that may have contributed to this decision making and the application of these findings for utilization review are discussed.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1977

Utilization review of the late adolescent patient in a mental health center: steps toward the development of criteria for the adequacy of assessment and treatment.

This study is concerned with an attempt to determine whether meaningful utilization review criteria could be productively generated by viewing a patient population from a developmental perspecitve. During a 2-year period, a multidisciplinary panel at Yale University sought to identify the sociodemographic, clinical, and administrative issues posed by late adolescents seeking treatment at the Connecticut Mental Health Center, New Haven. We sought to address the following questions: a) From what segment of the population were we drawing our adolescent patients? b) Who referred them for help? c) What kinds of problems led to referral? d) What were the diagnostic characteristics of the adolescent's evaluation? e) Under what conditions do adolescents terminate treatment? The charts of over 1222 adolescent patients were studied to help us answer these questions. Our investigation revealed that the adolescent patients seen at the Mental Health Center were sociodemographically and diagnostically heterogeneous. An increasingly large number of adolescents are referring themselves for evaluation and treatment, rather than being sent by schools, physicians, or social welfare agencies. The majority of patients seeking help come from blue collar or working class backgrounds mainly because of intrapsychic complaints of anxiety and depression. Upwardly mobile, they constitute a group who have completed their high school education, often live away from home, and are struggling with problems of defining an identity different from that of their family. Review of their charts indicated that significant sholastic, medical, and developmental information was frequently lacking or vaguely recorded. Our chart review also indicated that many clinicians did not ask their patients about symptoms relating to body functioning such as difficulties with sleeping, eating, or psychosomatic complaints. The study also discovered that it was difficult in the great majority of the charts reviewed to specify the adolescent's own perception of the difficulties which led them to seek help. Suggestions are then outlined for developing review criteria dealing with the emancipated adolescent, parental involvement in the treatment of the adolescent, treatment plans, and the termination of treatment. The comparative advantages of combining utilization review criteria from both a traditional "disease model" and a "developmental model" are discussed. The panel concluded that input from both perspectives is necessary in understanding the impact of a mental health delivery system upon adolescent patients, their family, and the community.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1992

The effects of utilization review on hospital use and expenditures: a covariance analysis.

Hospital utilization review (UR) has expanded rapidly in recent years and is now widely used by private payers as an approach to cost containment. This article reports estimates of the effects of UR on hospital utilization and medical expenditures based on a covariance estimation procedure. Claims data on 223 privately insured groups were analyzed covering a three-year period, 1984 through 1986. UR was associated with an approximate 12 percent decrease in admissions, a 14 percent decrease in hospital routine expenditures, and a 6 percent decrease in total medical expenditures. UR appears to reduce expenditures mainly by reducing admissions; hospital inpatient expenditures per admission were unaffected by the review activity. Analysis showed the effect of UR to have been greatest during the quarters immediately following implementation of the review activity. This finding underscores the need to analyze longitudinal data having sufficient time-series observations to obtain reliable estimates of long-term program impact. The analysis described here offers a computationally efficient alternative specification to the standard fixed-effects approach for analyzing pooled data, and is especially useful when the number of cross-section units is large.

Analysis of Variance↗