Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Uterine Perforation”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1989

Transabdominal and transvaginal ultrasonography of uterine perforation following suction curettage.

Uterine perforation is a rare complication of suction curettage. We report the sonographic findings of uterine perforation with extrusion of fetal parts through a previous cesarean section scar in a patient who underwent a first trimester therapeutic abortion. No previous examples of the sonographic diagnosis of scar rupture during curettage or of the transvaginal ultrasonographic findings in uterine perforation have been reported.

Abortion, Therapeutic↗
PubMed1984

Prevention of uterine perforation during curettage abortion.

Although uterine perforation is a potentially life-threatening complication of curettage abortion, little is known about the risk factors associated with uterine perforation or how to prevent it. Using linear logistic regression, we analyzed 67,175 curettage abortions performed at 13 institutions in the United States from 1975 through 1978. The overall incidence of confirmed perforation was 0.9 per 1,000 abortions. Performance of the abortion by a resident rather than by an attending physician was a powerful risk factor for perforation (relative risk, 5.5; 95% confidence interval, 3.3 to 9.2). Use of Laminaria for dilation had a protective effect, although this effect was not statistically significant (relative risk, 0.17; 95% confidence interval, 0.02 to 1.2). Among factors beyond the control of the physician, advancement of gestational age and previous delivery were significant risk factors. Use of Laminaria and performance of the abortion by an attending physician considerably lowered the risk of uterine perforation.

Abortion, Induced↗
PubMed2004

Trophoblastic tissue spread to the sigmoid colon after uterine perforation.

BACKGROUND: Trophoblastic tissue spread following uterine perforation during dilation and curettage is rare. We present a case of trophoblastic spread to the sigmoid colon following uterine perforation, which was treated by surgical removal of the implants and intramuscular administration of methotrexate. CASE: A woman presented 3 weeks after curettage for a blighted ovum. Laparotomy performed for suspected intra-abdominal bleeding revealed bleeding trophoblastic implants in a perforation tract and the anterior uterine wall and on the appendix epiploica of the sigmoid colon. The implants were surgically removed and methotrexate was administered for persistently high beta-hCG levels. The patient fully recovered. CONCLUSION: Extrauterine trophoblastic implants should be considered in women evaluated for abdominal pain whose pregnancy test is positive after uterine perforation. Conservative treatment with methotrexate in nonacute patients may be considered.

Adult↗
PubMed1979

Anatomic and clinical correlates of uterine perforation.

We reviewed cases of uterine perforations which occurred at or were referred to the Boston Hospital for Women, Lying-In Division, over the 2 year period from mid-1975 to mid-1977. There were 25 uterine perforations; twenty patients were pregnant and five were not. In the pregnant patients, 16 perforations involved the cervix or the lower uterine segment, whereas only four were located in the uterine fundus; in the nonpregnant patients, all five were fundal perforations. In the pregnant patients, 12 required laparotomy, eight had serious lacerations of the uterine artery, and three had hysterectomy while none of the nonpregnant patients had lacerations or required subsequent procedures. Thus, there is a significant anatomic difference between those perforations which occurred in the pregnant patients and in the nonpregnant patients, the manner in which they presented clinically, and the need for intervention via laparotomy, subsequent morbidity, and outcome as reflected in future reproductive capability. Perforation at or near the cervix may be more common than previously assumed. Furthermore, two distinct clinical entities of cervical perforation exist in pregnant patients as based on the anatomic location of the defect. The anatomy of cervical perforations, their recognition, and their management are discussed.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1983

Risk of uterine perforation among users of intrauterine devices.

Since 1965 there has been a substantial increase in the number of women in the United States who use the intrauterine contraceptive device (IUD). A collaborative multicenter case--control study was conducted to examine uterine perforation and uterine incarceration as well as several other suspected complications related to use of an IUD. To determine which attributes of the IUD and which user characteristics contribute to the risk of uterine perforation and incarceration, the authors analyzed 32 women with uterine perforation requiring transperitoneal removal, 106 women with uterine incarceration of an IUD which was removed transcervically, and 497 controls. Most important, women who were lactating at the time of IUD insertion were 10 times as likely to have had a uterine perforation as women with at least 1 live birth but who were not lactating at the time of insertion. An incarcerated IUD resulting in a difficult removal was 2.3 times as likely among women lactating at the time of insertion compared to women not lactating at the time of insertion. The likelihood of both uterine perforation and uterine incarceration were unchanged regardless of the type of IUD used.

Abortion, Induced↗
PubMed2003

[Analysis of 16 cases of uterine perforation during hysteroscopic electro-surgeries].

OBJECTIVE: To analyse the cause, diagnosis, treatment and preventive methods of uterine perforation resulting from hysteroscopic electro-surgeries. METHODS: Data of cases with uterine perforation were collected from 5 hospitals where overall 3,541 hysteroscopic electro-surgeries were done from May 1990 to July 2002. There were 1 468 transcervical resections of endometrium (TCRE), 797 cases of transcervical resection of myoma (TCRM), 783 cases of transcervical resection of endometrial polyp (TCRP), 189 cases of transcervical resection of uterine septa (TCRS), 112 cases of transcervical resection of uterine adhesion (TCRA) and 192 cases of transcervical removal of foreign body (TCRF). All operations were performed under B-ultrasonographic or laparoscopic monitoring. Cervical dilator stick was inserted into cervical canal or 200 micro g of misoprostol put in the posterior fornix the evening before operation. The procedures were done according to different indications and purposes. Cases of uterine perforation were divided into two groups: caused by approaching (entry-related) and by surgical instruments (technique-related). RESULTS: Totally sixteen cases (0.45%) of uterine perforation occurred. Seven cases occurred during cervical dilatation and 1 during hysteroscopy inserting lentry-related. Eight cases were technique-related caused by electrode. The incidences of uterine perforation of different operations were: TCRA 4.46% (5/112), TCRF 3.12% (6/192), TCRE 0.27% (4/1 468), TCRM 0.13% (1/797). TCRP and TCRS none. These 16 cases were all diagnosed during operations. 10 cases (62%) by B ultrasound and (or) laparoscopy, 6 cases (38%) by hysteroscopy and clinical features. 13 cases were complete uterine perforations, among them 2 were diagnosed by laparoscopic monitoring, 5 by B-ultrasonic monitoring, 4 by hysteroscopy and 2 by symptoms and B-ultrasound, 3 cases were incomplete uterine perforations in which 2 were diagnosed by laparoscopic monitoring and one by B-ultrasound monitoring. CONCLUSIONS: Half of uterine perforation cases were entry-related, so attention has to be paid to entry of Hegar or hysteroscopy (i.e., not dilate the cervix as possible and introduce the scope under direct vision). The other half were related to surgeons' experience and type of operation. TCRA and TCRF run more risks. B-ultrasound and (or) laparoscopy monitoring during hysteroscopic electro-surgery may help to prevent but not completely avoid uterine perforation.

Adult↗
PubMed1987

Insertion forces with intrauterine devices: implications for uterine perforation.

The force required to insert a Copper 7, Multiload Copper or Nova T IUD was measured in 197 successful and 25 unsuccessful insertion attempts. These forces were compared with the forces required to perforate freshly obtained uterine specimens with a metal uterine sound and Dalkon shield device, as well as with the clinically tested devices. The mean insertion forces for the Copper 7, Nova T and Multiload Copper devices were 1.502 N, 2.134 N and 4.041 N respectively, while the mean insertion pressures (N/mm2) were 0.203, 0.209 and 0.122 respectively. The mean in vitro fundal perforation forces with metal sounds was 20.7 N and with the Dalkon shield 31.6 N. The Copper 7, Multiload Copper and Nova T IUDs achieved mean in vitro forces of 5.75 N, 9.2 and 8.1 N respectively, without causing perforation. Primary uterine perforation at the time of insertion of these devices appears unlikely.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1995

Management of uterine perforations in connection with legal abortions.

The incidence of uterine perforation while performing legal abortions was evaluated in the Stockholm area. Among 84,850 legal abortions performed during 1982-1992 there were 145 cases of uterine perforation, 0.17%. In about half of these cases an immediate exploration of the abdomen was decided upon and in 18 patients there were significant bleeding and/or lacerations to organs situated in the pelvis. No case of intestinal perforation was encountered. It is likely that many of these injuries would have healed just as well unattended. Based on this study, the authors advocate a conservative approach in dealing with uterine perforation in connection with vacuum aspiration for legal abortion.

Abortion, Legal↗
PubMed1989

The frequency and management of uterine perforations during first-trimester abortions.

The frequency and management of uterine perforation during first-trimester abortions remain a matter of continuing debate among gynecologists. The rate of uterine perforations was 1.3/1000 procedures (eight cases) in 6408 women undergoing first-trimester abortions at our clinic. We also performed 706 first-trimester abortions at the time of laparoscopic sterilization. Two perforations (2.8/1000 procedures) were reported before laparoscopy. Twelve (15.6/1000 procedures) unsuspected perforations were discovered during direct laparoscopic visualization. This represents a 19.8/1000 procedure rate of perforation (14 cases). All 22 patients with perforations were managed conservatively, and no immediate or late complications were noted. Our data suggest that the true incidence of uterine perforations is significantly underestimated and serious complications caused by perforations are rare. Conservative therapy is recommended rather than early surgical intervention.

Abortion, Induced↗
PubMed1984

Uterine perforation by copper intrauterine device.

Sixteen cases with uterine perforation by a copper intrauterine device (IUD) are presented. In 13 cases the IUD had been inserted within 5 months following delivery, and in 6 cases the insertion had been painful. Missing string was the first sign in most cases. Laparatomy was performed in all cases to remove the IUD. The IUD was adherent to omentum or sigmoid in 10 cases. There is an increased risk of uterine perforation if the IUD is inserted postpartum during lactation and involution of the uterus. Therefore a painful IUD insertion and a missing string demand investigation of a partial or complete perforation.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Uterine perforation in women using a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system.

OBJECTIVE: To determine an estimated incidence of uterine perforations related to the insertion of a levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG IUS) and to identify possible risk factors. DESIGN: Retrospective, case report study. SETTING: Hospitals in Limburg, the Netherlands. METHODS: Gynecologists in hospitals in Limburg were asked about uterine perforations related to the insertion of a LNG IUS between 1999 and 2002. The charts of the reported perforations were studied. Data on the patient, doctor, insertion, diagnosis and removal were collected for every reported uterine perforation. RESULTS: In Limburg, the estimated incidence of uterine perforations related to the insertion of a LNG IUS is 2.6 per 1000 insertions. Insertion in lactating women, even beyond 6 weeks after delivery, was shown to be an important risk factor. CONCLUSIONS: Complete registration of complications provides a greater insight into the actual incidence of LNG IUS-related uterine perforations and their possible consequences. This may eventually lead to a decrease in complications.

Adult↗