Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “U.S. Senate”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

U.S. Senate Bill 422: the Genetic Confidentiality and Nondiscrimination Act of 1997.

On March 11, 1997, Senator Pete Domenici introduced U.S. Senate Bill 422, the Genetic Confidentiality and Non-Discrimination Act of 1997. The bill specifies that "existing legal protections for genetic information are inadequate to ensure genetic privacy and to prevent genetic discrimination." The first stated purpose of the bill is "to define the circumstances under which DNA samples may be collected, stored, and analyzed and genetic information may be collected, stored, analyzed, and disclosed." The bill reinforces statutes already passed in 19 states that guarantee patients certain rights of control over their own personal genetic information (Congressional Record, S2141). This bill fundamentally changes the mechanism whereby molecular biologists acquire tissue, and defines new obligations between researchers and human subjects. Even if this bill is not passed in its present form, it appears inevitable that legislation with a similar intent will soon emerge. Any such legislation will carry the full weight and penalties of law. Because many current research practices may violate these proposed new regulations, researchers should understand the provisions of S. 422. Furthermore, it is crucial that researchers understand the bill now, before it becomes law, because this may be their last opportunity to lobby for any modifications of the bill.

Confidentiality↗

U.S. Senate voting on health and safety regulation: the effects of ideology and interest-group orientations.

Ideological and interest-group influences attempt to influence policy formulation during the legislative process. In health and safety policy-making these interest-group influences, which are some of the best organized groups, are related to ideological and interest-group orientations of the legislators themselves. The authors analyzed Senate health care voting in the 95th U.S. Congress. General ideology, structured along the left-right dimension was important, but it was not the overriding factor. The senators voted as supporters or opponents of environmentalism as much or even more than as adherents of either liberal or conservative beliefs.

Accident Prevention↗

U.S. Senator champions PET.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, U.S.↗