SEARCH · Search PubMed
Results for “Truman v. Thomas”
Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Truman v. Thomas. 9 Jun 1980.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
California Supreme Court expands the informed consent doctine; physicians have a duty to obtain an informed refusal: Truman v. Thomas.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
From informed consent to a duty to convince: Truman v. Thomas.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Cancer nursing and the law: informed refusal. Part III.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Pap smears, prevention, primary care, and the guarantee of good health.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Informed dissent: a new corollary to the informed consent doctrine?
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Informed refusal: an unnecessary burden on physicians?
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Pap smears: physicians must disclose risk of refusal.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Protecting patient-doctor discourse: informed consent and deliberative autonomy.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Cancer nursing and the law: informed refusal. Part II.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Cancer nursing and the law: informed refusal. Part I.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Cancer nursing and the law: informed refusal. Part IV.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Law for the nurse manager: the right of informed refusal.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Informed consent: disclosing the risks of refusing treatment.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Innovative California court precedents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Liability in breast cancer screening.
The U.S. breast cancer mortality rate has risen over the past 29 years in women 50 years of age and older. This is surprising in light of the fact that the disease is curable when detected early through mammography together with clinical breast examinations (CBE). One major problem is that many women are not being screened. Only about one-third of women 50 years of age and older are receiving yearly screening mammograms, despite published guidelines. Regarding CBE, more women are receiving them, but there is room for improvement. The main reasons given by women for not having a mammogram are: 1) their physicians did not recommend it; 2) they did not know they needed one; or 3) they did not have any breast problems. These responses reflect a lack of awareness of breast cancer screening recommendations and indicate that women are not being given adequate information about breast cancer from their physicians. This paper will explore the medical malpractice literature in order to discuss the question of whether physicians should be liable for failing to inform their female patients.
Incubation periods for paediatric AIDS patients.
A recent seroprevalence study of newborns indicates that one in 62 children born in New York City has antibodies to the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). The distribution of incubation periods for paediatric patients is needed to estimate future AIDS case loads from these seroprevalence data. Current estimates of incubation periods for paediatric patients are based on limited data. We use parametric and non-parametric methods to analyse incubation periods for 215 paediatric patients with AIDS whose only known route of infection is maternal. We conclude that incubation periods are longer than previously reported; that there is a distinct knee in the incubation period distribution at seven months which suggests two risk populations; and that there is an increase in incidence which is consistent with exponential growth.