Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Travoprost”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2005

A three-month, multicenter, double-masked study of the safety and efficacy of travoprost 0.004%/timolol 0.5% ophthalmic solution compared to travoprost 0.004% ophthalmic solution and timolol 0.5% dosed concomitantly in subjects with open angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension.

PURPOSE: The primary objective of this study was to compare the intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering efficacy of travoprost 0.004%/timolol 0.5% fixed combination to the concomitant administration of travoprost 0.004% (TRAVATAN) and timolol 0.5% in subjects with open angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension. METHODS: This was a randomized, multicenter, double-masked, active-controlled, parallel group study. Three hundred sixteen patients with open angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension were randomly assigned to travoprost 0.004%/timolol 0.5% ophthalmic solution fixed combination once daily in the morning or concomitant administration of timolol 0.5% once daily in the morning and travoprost 0.004% ophthalmic solution once daily in the evening. The efficacy and safety of the fixed combination were compared with concomitant therapy over three months. The primary efficacy outcome measure was mean intraocular pressure. RESULTS: Both travoprost 0.004%/timolol 0.5% fixed combination and the concomitant administration of travoprost 0.004% and timolol 0.5% produced statistically significant reductions from baseline in IOP, with mean IOP ranging from 15.2 to 16.5 mm Hg in the patients using travoprost 0.004%/timolol 0.5% fixed combination compared with 14.7 to 16.1 mm Hg in the concomitant group. The upper 95.1% confidence limit for the differences in mean IOP (fixed combination minus concomitant) was < or =1.5 mm Hg at 7 of 9 visits, including all three 8 AM time points, 24-hours post-dose. Mean IOP reductions from baseline ranged from 7.4 to 9.4 mm Hg in the fixed combination group compared with 8.4 to 9.4 mm Hg with concomitant therapy. Safety analysis demonstrated equivalent safety between the two treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: A fixed combination of travoprost 0.004% and timolol 0.5% produced clinically relevant IOP reductions in patients with open angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension that were comparable to concomitant therapy with its components. Safety and tolerability of the fixed combination were also equivalent to concomitant therapy. Travoprost 0.004%/timolol 0.5% fixed combination offers IOP reduction equivalent to concomitant therapy, with potential benefits that include convenience (fewer bottles and drops per day), improved compliance, cost savings (based on fewer co-payments), and elimination of potential washout effects.

Aged↗
PubMed2002

Determination of travoprost and travoprost free acid in human plasma by electrospray HPLC/MS/MS.

A quantitative method for the analysis of AL-5848, the (+)-enantiomer of fluprostenol (FP), in human plasma is described. Plasma was spiked with a tetradeuterated analog of travoprost free acid (AL-5848X) as internal standard (IS) and acidified with 0.1 M formic acid. Sample clean up was performed using reversed phase solid-phase extraction. Following elution of the compounds of interest and evaporation to dryness, the residue was reconstituted in methanol:water (1:1) and chromatographed on an octadecylsilica (C18) column with negative ion electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry. The [M[bond]H](-) ions at m/z 457 and 461 for the analyte and IS, respectively, were subjected to collisional fragmentation with argon to yield the same intense 3-trifluoromethylphenolate (m/z 161) product ion. The validated concentration range was 0.010-3.00 ng/ml based on a 1.0 ml plasma aliquot. Fully adequate accuracy, precision, specificity, recovery and stability for routine use in clinical pharmacokinetic studies were demonstrated. Analysis of a second plasma aliquot following incubation with rabbit esterase allows the isopropyl ester pro-drug, travoprost (AL-6221), to be determined by difference.

Administration, Topical↗
PubMed2001

Travoprost compared with latanoprost and timolol in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension.

PURPOSE: This study evaluated the safety and intraocular pressure-lowering efficacy of two concentrations of travoprost (0.0015% and 0.004%) compared with latanoprost 0.005% and timolol 0.5% in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension. METHODS: Eight hundred one patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension were randomly assigned to travoprost 0.0015%, travoprost 0.004%, latanoprost 0.005%, or timolol 0.5%. The efficacy and safety of travoprost (0.0015% and 0.004%) daily was compared with latanoprost daily and timolol twice daily for a period of 12 months. RESULTS: Travoprost was equal or superior to latanoprost and superior to timolol with mean intraocular pressure over visits and time of day ranging from 17.9 to 19.1 mm Hg (travoprost 0.0015%), 17.7 to 19.1 mm Hg (travoprost 0.004%), 18.5 to 19.2 mm Hg (latanoprost), and 19.4 to 20.3 mm Hg (timolol). For all visits pooled, the mean intraocular pressure at 4 PM for travoprost was 0.7 mm Hg (0.0015%, P =.0502) and 0.8 mm Hg (0.004%, P =.0191) lower than for latanoprost. Travoprost 0.004% was more effective than latanoprost and timolol in reducing intraocular pressure in black patients by up to 2.4 mm Hg (versus latanoprost) and 4.6 mm Hg (versus timolol). Based on a criterion of 30% or greater intraocular pressure reduction from diurnal baseline or intraocular pressure 17 mm Hg or less, travoprost 0.0015% and 0.004% had an overall response to treatment of 49.3% and 54.7%, respectively, compared with 49.6% for latanoprost and 39.0% for timolol. Iris pigmentation change was observed in 10 of 201 of patients (5.0%) receiving travoprost 0.0015%, six of 196 of patients (3.1%) receiving travoprost 0.004%, 10 of 194 of patients (5.2%) receiving latanoprost, and none of the patients receiving timolol (0 of 196). The average ocular hyperemia score was less than 1 on a scale of 0 to 3, indicating that on average patients experienced between none/trace and mild for all treatment groups. There were no serious, unexpected, related adverse events reported for any therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Travoprost (0.0015% and 0.004%), a highly selective, potent prostaglandin F (FP) receptor agonist, is equal or superior to latanoprost and superior to timolol in lowering intraocular pressure in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension. In addition, travoprost 0.004% is significantly better than either latanoprost or timolol in lowering intraocular pressure in black patients. Travoprost is safe and generally well tolerated in the studied patient population.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Comparison of travoprost 0.0015% and 0.004% with timolol 0.5% in patients with elevated intraocular pressure: a 6-month, masked, multicenter trial.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the safety and intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering efficacy of once-daily travoprost (0.0015% and 0.004%) to twice-daily timolol 0.5%. DESIGN: Prospective, 6-month, randomized, controlled, multicenter, double-masked, phase III study. PARTICIPANTS: Six hundred five patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension. METHODS: Patients with an 8 AM IOP between 24 to 36 mmHg in at least one eye (the same eye) at two eligibility visits received either travoprost 0.0015%, travoprost 0.004% (dosed every day), or timolol 0.5% (dosed twice daily). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Mean IOP at 8 AM, 10 AM, and 4 PM in the patient's eye with the higher baseline IOP. RESULTS: The mean IOP was significantly lower for both concentrations of travoprost compared with timolol. Travoprost was statistically superior to timolol at 9 of 13 visits, with differences in IOP reductions ranging from 0.9 to 1.8 mmHg (0.0015%) and 10 of 13 visits with differences in IOP reductions from 0.9 to 2.4 mmHg (0.004%). Mean IOP changes from baseline ranged from -6.0 to -7.5 mmHg (0.0015%), -6.5 to -8.0 mmHg (0.004%), and -5.2 to -7.0 mmHg for timolol. Hyperemia was experienced at rates of 29.2% (59 of 202) for travoprost 0.0015%, 42.8% (86 of 201) for travoprost 0.004%, and 8.9% (18 of 202) for timolol. Iris pigmentation changes were observed in 1.0% (2 of 200) of patients receiving travoprost 0.004% with no changes noted in the travoprost 0.0015% group or the timolol group. A decrease in pulse and systolic blood pressure was observed in the timolol group. There were no other clinically relevant or statistically significant changes from baseline in ocular signs or laboratory values, and no serious, related, unexpected adverse events were reported for any group. CONCLUSIONS: Travoprost (0.0015% and 0.004%), dosed once daily in the evening, is statistically superior or equal to timolol 0.5% dosed twice daily at all treatment visits during this 6-month study. IOP reductions of up to 2.0 mmHg greater than timolol were found in the travoprost 0.004% pooled data group. Travoprost is safe and well tolerated in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension.

Aged↗
PubMed2006

[The Slovak study of the travoprost treatment efficacy].

PURPOSE: To confirm the efficacy of the travoprost treatment during twelve months follow-up in groups of patients: without previous treatment, with different previous anti-glaucomatous treatment, and with different stage of compensation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study evaluates the lowering of the intraocular pressure (IOP) in 143 patients (286 eyes). The intraocular pressure was measured by means of aplanation tonometry, before the treatment started, and after 1, 3, 9, and 12 months at 8-9 o'clock a.m. Patients were divided into eight groups according to the previous mono therapy or combined therapy substituted by travoprost mono therapy or its combination. A special group constituted patients with travoprost as a primary treatment. RESULTS: In the first group, with latanoprost substituted by travoprost, the intraocular pressure decreased by 7% (p < or = 0.0001). In the second group of patients, with travoprost as the primary glaucoma treatment, the intraocular pressure decreased by 22% (p < or = 0.0001). In the third group, the beta-blocker was substituted by travoprost, with 22 % (p < or = 0.0001) decrease of the IOP. In the fourth group, the combined therapy of beta-blocker with latanoprost was substituted by combination of beta-blocker and travoprost and the decrease by 8% (p < or = 0.0001) was significant during the first nine months of the follow-up period, later on, the decrease was not significant. The substitution of the combination of beta-blocker and latanoprost by travoprost mono therapy in the fifth group created only no significant lowering of the IOP during the whole follow-up period. If the travoprost mono therapy substituted the combination of beta-blocker with local carboanhydrase inhibitor in the sixth group, the IOP decreased by 20% (p < or = 0.001). In the seventh group, the combination of the local carboanhydrase inhibitor and latanoprost was substituted by combination of the local carboanhydrase inhibitor with travoprost, the IOP lowering was not significant. On the other hand, in the eighth group, different combinations of antiglaucomatics were substituted by travoprost, and this caused significant lowering of IOP by 20% (p < or = 0.0001). In all cases, the lowest decrease of IOP during the whole follow-up period in the eye with worse compensation is given. CONCLUSION: Travoprost lowered effectively the intraocular pressure in 6 out of 8 groups of patients, e.g. in 129 patients (out of 143 patients), the range of lowering was 7-28% bellow the initial level, the follow up period was 12 months. The decrease of the IOP was stable. The drug was well tolerated.

Cloprostenol↗
PubMed2001

Comparison of topical travoprost eye drops given once daily and timolol 0.5% given twice daily in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension.

PURPOSE: This 9-month study compared the intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering efficacy and safety of once-daily travoprost ophthalmic solutions (0.0015% and 0.004%) with twice-daily timolol 0.5%. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study was conducted using a double-masked, randomized, parallel-group design; adult patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension (IOP between 24 and 36 mm Hg, inclusive at 9 am and between 21 and 36 mm Hg, inclusive, at 11 am and 4 pm on two eligibility visits after an appropriate washout of previous treatments). In both eyes, the travoprost vehicle (placebo) was instilled at 9 am and travoprost (0.0015% or 0.004%) was instilled at 9 pm, or timolol 0.5% was instilled at both times. The primary efficacy variable was mean IOP measured at 9 am, 11 am, and 4 pm at baseline and follow-up visits. RESULTS: Five hundred seventy-three patients were randomized to the study treatments. Mean IOP, which was combined across study visits, was lower with travoprost 0.004% than with timolol 0.5% at 9 am (P = 0.0246), 11 am (P = 0.0039), and 4 pm (P = 0.0004). Intraocular pressure was lower with travoprost 0.004% than with travoprost 0.0015% at 11 am (P = 0.0314), the time of peak drug activity. Mean IOP was consistently lower with travoprost 0.0015% than with timolol 0.5%. Mean IOP reductions from baseline were significantly (P less than equal 0.0001) greater with travoprost 0.004% (8.0-8.9 mm Hg) than with timolol 0.5% (6.3-7.9 mm Hg). The most frequent related adverse events were hyperemia, pruritus, discomfort, pain, and iris pigmentation changes. The local tolerance was better in the timolol group compared with patients receiving travoprost. There were no serious unexpected treatment-related adverse events in any group. CONCLUSIONS: Travoprost 0.004% reduced diurnal mean intraocular pressure significantly more than timolol 0.5%. Both concentrations of travoprost were well tolerated and safe for use in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension.

Administration, Topical↗
PubMed2004

Additivity of bimatoprost or travoprost to latanoprost in glaucomatous monkey eyes.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the ocular hypotensive effect of the commercially available preparations of bimatoprost or travoprost added to latanoprost in monkey eyes with laser-induced unilateral glaucoma. METHODS: Four monkeys with unilateral laser-induced glaucoma were used in each treatment group and received drops in the glaucomatous eye only. Intraocular pressure (IOP) was measured hourly for 6 hours, beginning at 9:30 am on day 1 (untreated baseline), days 6 and 7 (single-agent therapy), and days 13 and 14 (2-drug combination therapy). On days 2 through 7, 1 drop of the scheduled single agent was given immediately after the 9:30 am IOP measurement, and on days 8 through 14, the second scheduled drug was given 5 minutes after the first. The following 5 different dosing protocols were studied: latanoprost with bimatoprost added, bimatoprost with latanoprost added, latanoprost with travoprost added, travoprost with latanoprost added, and latanoprost with a second dose of latanoprost added. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant (P =.95) differences among the mean baseline IOPs in any of the 5 treatment groups. When applied as single agents, latanoprost, bimatoprost, and travoprost all produced significant (P<.05) and equivalent (P =.98) reductions in IOP. The mean +/-SEM maximum reduction (P<.05) from baseline IOP was 7.0 +/- 0.4 mm Hg (20% reduction) with travoprost alone, 6.5 +/- 1.6 mm Hg (18%) with bimatoprost alone, and 7.5 +/- 1.0 mm Hg (22%) with latanoprost alone. The mean +/-SEM maximum additive reductions in IOP were 3.0 +/- 0.6 mm Hg (P<.05) for travoprost added to latanoprost; 2.0 +/- 0.4 mm Hg (P<.05) for latanoprost added to travoprost; 4.8 +/- 1.3 mm Hg (P<.05) for bimatoprost added to latanoprost; 4.3 +/- 0.6 mm Hg (P<.05) for latanoprost added to bimatoprost; and 0.3 +/- 0.5 mm Hg (P>.60) for latanoprost added to itself. The combination of bimatoprost and latanoprost produced a greater (P<.05) lowering of IOP at trough and peak than the combination of travoprost and latanoprost. CONCLUSIONS: Latanoprost, bimatoprost, and travoprost used as monotherapy produced significant and equivalent reductions in IOP in glaucomatous monkey eyes. The IOP effects of the commercial concentrations of bimatoprost or travoprost were additive to that of latanoprost, with bimatoprost showing a greater additive response than travoprost. Clinical Relevance Because treatment with multiple medications is common among patients with glaucoma, determining which glaucoma medications produce an additive ocular hypotensive response when used in combination has practical implications for clinicians.

Amides↗
PubMed2006

Travoprost compared with other prostaglandin analogues or timolol in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension: meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: It is still uncertain whether travoprost has comparable or better efficacy compared with other prostaglandin analogues or timolol in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension. The authors performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to evaluate the incidence of reported side-effects and intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering effect of travoprost versus other prostaglandin analogues (latanaprost, bimatoprost, unoprostone) or timolol. METHODS: Systematic literature retrieval was conducted in Pubmed, EMBASE, Chinese Bio-medicine Database and Cochrane Controlled Trials Register to identify the potentially relevant randomized controlled trials. The statistical analysis was performed by RevMan 4.1 software that was provided by the Cochrane Collaboration. The outcome measures were the incidence of reported side-effects (hyperaemia, iris pigmentation, eyelash changes) and mean IOP pooled over treatment visits. RESULTS: In total, 12 articles involving 3048 patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension were included in this meta-analysis. The combined results showed that travoprost 0.004% was more effective than timolol or travoprost 0.0015% in lowering IOP, but not more effective than bimatoprost or latanoprost. Travoprost 0.004% caused a higher percentage of hyperaemia than timolol, latanoprost, or travoprost 0.0015%. There was an increased incidence of pigmentation with travoprost than timolol. Travoprost 0.004% caused a higher percentage of eyelash changes than timolol, latanoprost, or travoprost 0.0015%. CONCLUSION: According to data available, travoprost is more effective than timolol in lowering IOP in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension. Compared with other prostaglandin analogues, travoprost appears to be equivalent to bimatoprost and latanoprost. Although a limited number of local side-effects were reported, no serious treatment-related side-effects were reported.

Aged↗
PubMed2002

Travoprost--a new prostaglandin analogue for the treatment of glaucoma.

Travoprost, a highly selective and potent analogue of the prostaglandin PGF(2)(alpha), has recently been approved and marketed as a topical ocular hypotensive agent for the treatment of ocular hypertension and glaucoma. Following absorption into the eye, the free acid form of travoprost interacts with the endogenous FP prostanoid receptor to enhance aqueous humor outflow and lower intraocular pressure (IOP). Travoprost is distinguished from other marketed prostaglandin analogues in that it is a full agonist at the prostaglandin receptor. It is also highly selective with little or no affinity for other prostanoid or non-prostanoid receptors in the eye. Travoprost provides robust lowering of IOP with little diurnal fluctuation and results in low target pressures in a large percentage of patients. In controlled clinical trials, travoprost 0.004% o.d. used as monotherapy produced greater IOP reduction than timolol 0.5% b.i.d. and equal or greater reduction than latanoprost 0.005%o.d. Travoprost 0.004% was also shown to be an effective adjunctive agent offering an additional 5 - 7 mmHg IOP reduction in patients inadequately controlled on timolol 0.5%. Subgroup analysis of a large Phase III trial revealed travoprost 0.004% to be significantly more effective at lowering IOP in African American patients by almost 2 mmHg compared to non-African Americans. Moreover, a higher percentage of African American patients responded to travoprost 0.004% and reached lower target pressures than with either latanoprost 0.005% or timolol 0.5%. Travoprost is a very stable compound, maintaining its efficacy following exposure to extremely low and high temperatures, repeated freezing and thawing and exposure to light. Throughout all clinical trials, travoprost was found to be safe and well-tolerated with very few (< 5%) discontinuations due to adverse events. Travoprost 0.004% represents a clinically significant advance for the treatment of glaucoma and ocular hypertension, offering superior IOP reduction and diurnal control, especially among African American patients, in a safe, well-tolerated, stable formulation.

Adrenergic beta-Antagonists↗
PubMed2007

Travoprost 0.004% with and without benzalkonium chloride: a comparison of safety and efficacy.

PURPOSE: To compare the safety and efficacy of travoprost 0.004% without benzalkonium chloride (BAC) to that of the marketed formulation of travoprost 0.004% in patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension. METHODS: The study was a double-masked, randomized, parallel group, multicenter, noninferiority design. Adult patients with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension with qualifying intraocular pressure (IOP) on 2 eligibility visits received either travoprost 0.004% with BAC (n=346), or travoprost 0.004% without BAC (n=344) dosed once-daily each evening. Patients were followed for a period of 3 months. IOP measurements at 8 AM, 10 AM, and 4 PM were taken at study visits on week 2, week 6, and month 3. RESULTS: Mean IOP reductions, across all 9 study visits and times ranged from 7.3 to 8.5 mm Hg for travoprost 0.004% without BAC and from 7.4 to 8.4 mm Hg for travoprost 0.004% with BAC. Statistical equivalence was also demonstrated for the comparison of mean IOP changes; 95% confidence limits were within +/-0.8 mm Hg at 9 of 9 study visits and times in both the per protocol and intent-to-treat data sets. Adverse events and the number of patients discontinued owing to adverse events were similar for both treatment groups. Adverse events due to hyperemia occurred in 6.4% and 9.0% of patients treated with travoprost 0.004% without BAC and travoprost 0.004% with BAC, respectively. CONCLUSION: Travoprost 0.004% without BAC is equivalent to travoprost 0.004% with BAC in both safety and efficacy.

Aged↗
PubMed2006

A randomized, investigator-masked, 4-week study comparing timolol maleate 0.5%, brinzolamide 1%, and brimonidine tartrate 0.2% as adjunctive therapies to travoprost 0.004% in adults with primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess the hypotensive efficacy of timolol maleate 0.5%, brinzolamide 1%, or brimonidine tartrate 0.2% ophthalmic solution, administered in conjunction with travoprost 0.004%, in patients with primary open-angle laucoma (OAG) or ocular hypertension (OHT) whose intraocular pressure (IOP) did not meet the treatment target using travoprost 0.004% monotherapy. METHODS: This was a randomized, comparative, investigator-masked study. Patients with OAG or OHT treated with travoprost 0.004% monotherapy were randomized to receive 1 of the 3 adjunctive therapies (timolol maleate 0.5%, brinzolamide 1%, or brimonidine tartrate 0.2%), 1 drop BID in each randomized eye, in addition to 1 drop QD of travoprost for a period of 4 weeks. IOP was measured on days 0 (travoprost 0.004%) and 28 (travoprost 0.004% and adjunctive treatment). Adverse events were monitored on days 0 and 28 by patient interview. RESULTS: Twenty-nine patients with OAG (46 eyes) and 3 patients with OHT (6 eyes), with a total of 52 eligible eyes, completed the study; 28 eyes were from male patients and 24 were from female patients. In addition to continuing travoprost treatment, 20 eyes received timolol, 16 eyes received brinzolamide, and 16 eyes were treated with brimonidine. There were no significant differences among the groups in the mean (SD) IOP at baseline on day 0 (19.0 [4.1], 17.2 [3.5], and 17.0 [3.1] mm Hg, respectively; P=NS). On day 28, the reduction in mean (SD) IOP in eyes treated with brimonidine tartrate 0.2% was significantly smaller (2.3 [1.8] mm Hg vs 3.9 [1.8] mm Hg [P=0.01]) and the mean (SD) percentage reduction in IOP was significantly smaller (13.4% [9.1%] vs 20.2% [7.5%] [P=0.01]) when compared with timolol maleate 0.5%, and likewise when compared with brinzolamide 1% (4.0 [2.1] mm Hg [P=0.02] and 22.7% [8.6%] [P=0.006], respectively). The group treated with brinzolamide was associated with a similar reduction in IOP to timolol (P=NS for both mean [SD] IOP and percentage reduction in IOP compared with timolol monotherapy). Barring the occasional conjunctival hyperemia, which was excluded as an adverse event for the purposes of this study, no adverse events were recorded. CONCLUSION: Brinzolamide 1% and timolol maleate 0.5% treatment were both associated with a significantly greater reduction in IOP compared with brimonidine 0.2% when administered as a nonfixed adjuvant to travoprost 0.004% in the treatment of patients with OAG and OHT whose IOP was inadequately controlled with travoprost monotherapy. All treatments were well tolerated.

Adrenergic alpha-Agonists↗
PubMed2004

Comparison of the diurnal ocular hypotensive efficacy of travoprost and latanoprost over a 44-hour period in patients with elevated intraocular pressure.

BACKGROUND: Prostaglandin analogues are effective ocular hypotensive agents and are being used increasingly in the treatment of elevated intraocular pressure (IOP). These agents are typically dosed once daily. OBJECTIVES: A pilot study was conducted to evaluate the duration of travoprost's IOP-lowering efficacy up to 84 hours after the final dose in patients with open-angle glaucoma. A follow-up study was conducted to compare diurnal IOP control with travoprost and latanoprost over a 44-hour period. METHODS: In the open label pilot study, patients received 0.004% travoprost in both eyes at 8 pm daily for 2 weeks. After 2 weeks, IOP was measured before administration of the last daily dose, every 4 hours thereafter for 36 hours, and 60 and 84 hours after the last dose, with no additional ocular hypotensive medication given. In the controlled, double-masked, parallel-group, follow-up study, patients were randomized to self-administer 1 drop of the marketed doses of 0.004% travoprost or 0.005% latanoprost in both eyes at 8 pm daily for 2 weeks. At the end of this period, patients returned to the facility at approximately 8 pm for IOP measurement and administration of the final dose of study medication. IOP was then measured at 4-hour intervals for 44 hours after the last dose, with no additional ocular hypotensive medication given. RESULTS: The pilot study included 21 patients (67% female, 33% male; age range, 35-81 years) with open-angle glaucoma. IOP values were significantly below baseline at all time points up to 84 hours after the final dose of travoprost ( P<0.001). The follow-up study enrolled 35 patients, 1 of whom was excluded for missing data; thus, the intent-to-treat analysis included 34 patients (68% female, 32% male; age range, 36-72 years). At the unmedicated eligibility visit, mean IOP over 24 hours ranged from 21 to 26 mm Hg in each treatment group. After 2 weeks of treatment and 24 hours after the last dose, mean (SD) IOP was 13.1 (2.1) mm Hg (change from eligibility visit, -10.4 [2.7] mm Hg) in the travoprost group and 16.0 (3.1) mm Hg (change from eligibility visit, -7.1 [2.4] mm Hg) in the latanoprost group. The difference in change from baseline was statistically significant between treatment groups (P=0.006). Travoprost lowered IOP significantly at all time points throughout the 44-hour period after the last dose (mean IOP, <or=18 mm Hg; [P<0.001) and was statistically superior to latanoprost at 8 pm before the last dose (P=0.041) and 24 hours after the last dose (P=0.006). Latanoprost showed greater IOP-lowering efficacy compared with travoprost 4 hours after the last dose (P=0.040). IOP reductions were significantly different from zero at all time points with both treatments (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The results of the pilot study suggest that travoprost produces reductions in IOP that may be sustained for up to 84 hours after dosing. The results of the follow-up study suggest that both prostaglandin analogues significantly lower IOP from baseline in patients with open-angle glaucoma and provide excellent diurnal IOP control throughout a 24-hour period.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Influence of switching to travoprost on intraocular pressure of uncontrolled chronic open-angle glaucoma patients compliant to previously-used topical medication.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the influence of switching to travoprost on intraocular pressure (IOP) of chronic open-angle glaucoma (COAG) patients. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Multicentre, open-label, non-comparative, 12-week, phase IV study conducted at 10 academic and hospital centres in Hungary. Patients' compliance to use of the pre-study medication was confirmed at a visit 10 days before the baseline measurements, and compliance was monitored throughout the study period. RESULTS: Of the 203 COAG patients three (1.48%) ceased travoprost medication due to ocular hyperaemia, and one subject was lost from follow-up. Self-reported compliance was optimal except for two patients. For the per-protocol analysis 197 patients were evaluable. IOP of the 37 per-protocol patients receiving additional travoprost medication decreased from 23.1 +/- 3.2 mmHg (mean +/- SD) to 17.3 +/- 2.6 mmHg at week 12 (p < 0.001). Switching the 121 per-protocol patients from latanoprost to travoprost IOP decrease from 20.8 +/- 3.5 mmHg to 17.7 +/- 2.4 mmHg (p < 0.001). IOP of the 11 patients switched from topical nonselective beta-blockers to travoprost decreased from 20.1 +/- 2.1 mmHg to 15.7 +/- 1.5 mmHg (p < 0.001). For the whole per-protocol population (n = 197) IOP decreased from 21.0 +/- 3.4 mmHg to 17.4 +/- 2.4 mmHg (p < 0.001). Defining responders as having an IOP decrease > 2.0 mmHg or >or= 5 mmHg at week 12, the responder rate was respectively 62.9% or 31% for the total study population; 86.5% or 54.1% when travoprost was added to the established therapy; 54.5% or 24.0% if latanoprost was switched to travoprost; and 90.9% or 36.4% for those who switched from beta-blockers. CONCLUSION: Travoprost provided a clinically and statistically significant IOP decrease in uncontrolled COAG patients whose self-reported compliance to their previous topical medication was optimal. Our results suggest that the IOP reduction found after switching to travoprost is not explainable by improved compliance due to the clinical study situation.

Administration, Topical↗
PubMedDate not supplied

A comparison of travoprost, latanoprost, and the fixed combination of dorzolamide and timolol in patients with pseudoexfoliation glaucoma.

PURPOSE: To compare the intraocular pressure (IOP) lowering effect and safety of latanoprost, travoprost given every evening, and the fixed combination dorzolamide + timolol (DTFC) given twice daily in pseudoexfoliation glaucoma (PXG). METHODS: This randomized, prospective, investigator-masked study has been conducted with 50 PXG patients. Patients were assigned to one of three groups: travoprost 0.004%, fixed combination of dorzolamide 2%+timolol 0.5%, or latanoprost 0.005% for 6 months. At baseline and 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 months of therapy, IOP (8 am, 10 am, 4 pm), blood pressures, and pulse rates were measured, and ophthalmologic examination was performed. The side effects were recorded at each visit. RESULTS: Forty-two of the 50 patients initially enrolled completed this study. Withdrawn patients included one (latanoprost) for lack of efficacy, five (three travoprost, one latanoprost, one DTFC) for adverse events, and two (one latanoprost, one DTFC) for loss of follow-up. Each of the three drugs considerably reduced the IOP in PXG cases throughout the 6 months. Mean IOP reduction at 6 months was -9.3+/-2.9 mmHg in the travoprost group, -8.2+/-1.2 mmHg in the latanoprost group, and 11.5+/-3.3 mmHg in the DTFC group. Comparing the groups, DTFC is more effective than latanoprost and travoprost in lowering IOP (p<0.05). There was no difference between travoprost and latanoprost. The most common treatment-related adverse event was conjunctival hyperemia. Intensity of ocular hyperemia was greater in the travoprost group compared with the latanoprost and DTFC groups (p<0.05). There were no significant effects on systemic safety parameters. CONCLUSIONS: The results demonstrated that DTFC is more effective in reducing IOP than latanoprost and travoprost. Latanoprost and travoprost had similar ocular hypotensive effects in patients with PXG. All three drugs were well tolerated; there were fewer ocular side effects attributable in the latanoprost group.

Aged↗
PubMed2006

A 6-week, double-masked, parallel-group study of the efficacy and safety of travoprost 0.004% compared with latanoprost 0:005%/timolol 0.5% in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to directly compare the intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering efficacy and safety of travoprost 0.004% eyedrops with the fixed combination of latanoprost 0.005%/timolol 0.5% eyedrops in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension. METHODS: This was a randomized, double-masked, multicenter, parallel-group, active-controlled study. Adult subjects with open-angle glaucoma (with or without pseudoexfoliation or pigment dispersion component) or ocular hypertension were eligible to participate if their IOP was inadequately controlled with > or =4 weeks of beta-blocker monotherapy, as indicated by IOP of 22 to 36 mm Hg at 9 AM at screening. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive placebo + travoprost or latanoprost/timolol + placebo. Patients in the travoprost group administered travoprost at 9 PM and placebo at 9 AM; patients in the latanoprost/timolol group administered latanoprost/timolol at 9 AM and placebo at 9 PM. IOP measurements were performed using Goldmann applanation tonometry at 9 AM and 5 PM at the week-2 and week-6 visits. Both volunteered and elicited reports of adverse events were collected; all patients who were randomized and received > or =1 dose of study drug were included in the safety analysis. RESULTS: One hundred ten patients were randomized, of whom 106 patients were evaluable (travoprost, n = 50; latanoprost/timolol, n = 56). There were no statistically significant differences at baseline between the treatment groups, based on age group, sex, race, iris color, or diagnosis. Mean IOP values were not statistically different between groups at baseline or during treatment. In the pooled results for 9 Am assessment at weeks 2 and 6, mean (SEM) IOP reductions for travoprost and latanoprost/timolol were 7.0 (0.5) and 6.4 (0.5) mm Hg, respectively (P = NS). Adverse events related to therapy were mild in nature, and there were no statistically significant differences between the 2 treatment groups. The most frequently experienced adverse events in the travoprost group were ocular hyperemia (9.3%), foreign body sensation (5.6%), abnormal vision (1.9%), allergic reaction (1.9%), conjunctivitis (1.9%), dacryocystitis (1.9%), eye discharge (1.9%), eye pruritus (1.9%), lid edema (1.9%), lid erythema (1.9%), and tearing (1.9%). In the latanoprost/timolol group, the most frequently experienced adverse events were cataract (1.8%), dry eyes (1.8%), eye pruritus (1.8%), foreign body sensation (1.8%), and ocular hyperemia (1.8%). CONCLUSIONS: Mean IOP changes from baseline for travoprost 0.004% and latanoprost 0.005%/timolol 0.5% fixed combination were not significantly different at follow-up in these patients. Both medications were well tolerated.

Aged↗
PubMed2003

Conjunctival hyperemia in healthy subjects after short-term dosing with latanoprost, bimatoprost, and travoprost.

PURPOSE: To evaluate conjunctival hyperemia after short-term use of latanoprost 0.005%, bimatoprost 0.03% and travoprost 0.004% in normal adults. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, double-masked crossover active controlled comparison. METHODS: We evaluated conjunctival hyperemia by a standard photographic measure at the slit lamp and by anterior segment photographs in healthy subjects after dosing for 5 days with latanoprost, bimatoprost, or travoprost. Conjunctival hyperemia was evaluated at 24-hour trough (hour 0) and at hour 1 after dosing. Each subject was crossed over between periods after a 1-week washout interval. RESULTS: Twenty-eight subjects (mean age 26 +/- 9 years) completed this study. Several comparisons were noted to be significant between groups by slit-lamp biomicroscopy: first, at hour 0 latanoprost had significantly less hyperemia than bimatoprost; second, at hour 0 latanoprost showed significantly less change than bimatoprost compared with the study baseline (visit 2); third, at hour 1 latanoprost had significantly less hyperemia than travoprost; fourth, at hour 1 latanoprost demonstrated significantly less change from baseline in hyperemia than travoprost (visit 2); fifth, at hour 1 latanoprost had less change in hyperemia than bimatoprost or travoprost between the study and the nonstudy eye (P = .03); and last, at hour 1 latanoprost showed significantly less change than bimatoprost and travoprost compared with hour 0 (P = .04). Additionally, similar grades were observed by photographs with latanoprost demonstrating the lowest levels of hyperemia. Subjects complained less about other people noticing their red eye with latanoprost than bimatoprost or travoprost (P = .048). No serious adverse events were noted. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that latanoprost may cause significantly less short-term conjunctival hyperemia on average than bimatoprost or travoprost in healthy subjects.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

24-h IOP control with latanoprost, travoprost, and bimatoprost in subjects with exfoliation syndrome and ocular hypertension.

PURPOSE: To compare the 24-h IOP reductions induced by latanoprost, travoprost, and bimatoprost in eyes with exfoliation syndrome (XFS) associated with ocular hypertension (OH). METHODS: This was a prospective, randomized, single masked, and parallel design study with 15 patients in each treatment group. After washout of any previous medications, each patient underwent a baseline 24-h IOP curve testing at 0600, 0900, 1200, 1500, 1800, 2100, and at 2400 (midnight) hours. Patients were then randomized to receive latanoprost, travoprost, or bimatoprost once a day for 3 months. The 24-h curve testing was repeated at first week, and first and third months. RESULTS: Maximal and minimal IOP was recorded at 0600 and 1800-2100 hours. There was no significant difference among treatment groups at any time-point except for the first week. At the first week, the travoprost group had significantly lower IOP levels than the latanoprost and bimatoprost groups. All medicines significantly lowered 24-h IOP from baseline (P=0.001 for each). Although there was no significant difference in IOP reduction among groups at first week and first month, bimatoprost reduced the 24-h IOP (7.9+/-1.4) more than travoprost (6.6+/-0.5) at the end of the third month (P=0.003). The mean 24-h range of IOP was lowest with travoprost in all visits, and between-group differences was significant for travoprost vslatanoprost (P=0.007) and travoprost vsbimatoprost (P=0.001) at the third month. CONCLUSION: Latanoprost, travoprost, and bimatoprost were effective in reducing the 24-h IOP in patients with XFS and OH, and more research is required with a larger study.

Amides↗
PubMed2003

Absence of vasoactive properties of travoprost in isolated porcine ciliary arteries.

BACKGROUND: Ocular blood flow dysregulation is considered to be a risk factor associated with the optic neuropathy observed in glaucoma patients. The present study evaluates the vasoactive effect of the ocular hypotensive agent travoprost (Travatan) on isolated pig ciliary arteries. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Isometric forces were measured with a myograph system. Quiescent vessels were exposed in a cumulative manner to increasing concentrations (0.1 nM - 0.1 mM) of travoprost ([+]-fluprostenol). Vessels pre-contracted with 100 mM potassium chloride (KCl) or 10 nM endothelin-1 were also exposed in a similar manner to travoprost. Time-control experiments without travoprost were always run in parallel. In quiescent vessels, contractions were expressed in percent of 100 mM KCl-induced contractions. In vessels pre-contracted with endothelin-1, relaxations were expressed in percent of the maximal contraction induced by this peptide, while in those pre-contracted with KCl, relaxations were expressed in percent of the plateau-contraction reached 30 minutes after the application of this drug. RESULTS: In quiescent vessels, travoprost had no statistically significant vasoconstrictive effect. In KCl- or in endothelin-1 pre-contracted vessels, travoprost had no statistically significant vasorelaxing effect. CONCLUSIONS: Although the clinical relevance of the results of this study for patients treated with travoprost (Travatan) needs to be further investigated, travoprost appears to have no vasoconstrictive properties in isolated porcine ciliary arteries.

Animals↗