Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Tirapazamine”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Tirapazamine plus cisplatin versus cisplatin in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: A report of the international CATAPULT I study group. Cisplatin and Tirapazamine in Subjects with Advanced Previously Untreated Non-Small-Cell Lung Tumors.

PURPOSE: A phase III trial, Cisplatin and Tirapazamine in Subjects with Advanced Previously Untreated Non-Small-Cell Lung Tumors (CATAPULT I), was designed to determine the efficacy and safety of tirapazamine plus cisplatin for the treatment of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with previously untreated NSCLC were randomized to receive either tirapazamine (390 mg/m(2) infused over 2 hours) followed 1 hour later by cisplatin (75 mg/m(2) over 1 hour) or 75 mg/m(2) of cisplatin alone, every 3 weeks for a maximum of eight cycles. RESULTS: A total of 446 patients with NSCLC (17% with stage IIIB disease and pleural effusions; 83% with stage IV disease) were entered onto the study. Karnofsky performance status (KPS) was >/= 60 for all patients (for 10%, KPS = 60; for 90%, KPS = 70 to 100). Sixty patients (14%) had clinically stable brain metastases. The median survival was significantly longer (34.6 v 27. 7 weeks; P =.0078) and the response rate was significantly greater (27.5% v 13.7%; P <.001) for patients who received tirapazamine plus cisplatin (n = 218) than for those who received cisplatin alone (n = 219). The tirapazamine-plus-cisplatin regimen was associated with mild to moderate adverse events, including acute, reversible hearing loss, reversible, intermittent muscle cramping, diarrhea, skin rash, nausea, and vomiting. There were no incremental increases in myelosuppression, peripheral neuropathy, or renal, hepatic, or cardiac toxicity and no deaths related to tirapazamine. CONCLUSION: The CATAPULT I study shows that tirapazamine enhances the activity of cisplatin in patients with advanced NSCLC and confirms that hypoxia is an exploitable therapeutic target in human malignancies.

Adult↗

Implantable polymers for tirapazamine treatments of experimental intracranial malignant glioma.

Malignant gliomas remain refractory to intensive radiotherapy and cellular hypoxia enhances clinical radioresistance. Under hypoxic conditions, the benzotriazine di-N-oxide (3-amino-1,2,4-benzotriazine 1,4-dioxide) (tirapazamine) is reduced to yield a free-radical intermediate that results in DNA damage and cellular death. For extracranial xenografts, tirapazamine treatments have shown promise. We therefore incorporated tirapazamine into the synthetic, biodegradable polymer, measured the release, and tested the efficacy both alone and in combination with external beam radiotherapy in the treatment of experimental intracranial human malignant glioma xenografts. The [(poly(bis(p-carboxyphenoxy)-propane) (PCPP):sebacic acid (SA) (PCPP:SA ratio 20:80)] polymer was synthesized. The PCPP:SA polymer and solid tirapazamine were combined to yield proportions of 20% or 30% (wt/wt). Polymer discs (3 x 2 mm) (10 mg) were incubated (PBS, 37 degrees C), and the proportion of the drug released vs. time was recorded. Male nu/nu nude mice were anesthetized and received intracranial injections of 2 x 10(5) U251 human malignant glioma cells. For single intraperitoneal (i.p.) drug and/or external radiation treatments, groups of mice had i.p. 0.3 mmol/kg tirapazamine, 5 Gy cranial irradiation, or combined treatments on day 8 after inoculation. For fractionated drug and radiation treatments, mice had i.p. 0.15 mmol/kg tirapazamine, 5 Gy radiation, or combined treatments on days 8 and 9 after inoculation. For intracranial (i.c.) polymer treatments, mice had craniectomies and intracranial placement of polymer discs at the site of cellular inoculation. The maximally tolerated percentage loading of tirapazamine in the polymer.disc was determined. On day 7 after inoculation, groups of mice had i.c. empty or 3% tirapazamine alone or combined with radiation (5 Gy x 2 doses) or combined with i.p. drug (0.15 mmol/kg x 2 doses on days 8 and 9). Survival was recorded. Polymers showed controlled, protracted in vitro release for over 100 days. The 5 Gy x 1 treatment resulted in improved survival; 28.5 +/- 3.7 days (P = 0.01 vs. controls), while the single i.p. 0.3 mmol/kg tirapazamine treatment, 17.5 +/- 1.9 days (P = NS) and combined treatments; 21.5 +/- 5.0 days (P = NS) were not different. The fractionated treatments: 5 Gy x 2, i.p. 0.15 mmol/kg tirapazamine x 2 and the combined treatments resulted in improved survival: 44.5 +/- 3.9 (P < 0.001), 24.5 +/- 2.3 (P = 0.05) and 50.0 +/- 6.0 (P < 0.001), respectively. Survival after intracranial empty polymer was 16.5 +/- 3.0 days and increased to 31.0 +/- 3.0 (P = 0.003) days when combined with the 5 Gy x 2 treatment. The survival after the polymer bearing 3% tirapazamine alone vs. combined with radiation was not different. The combined 3% tirapazamine polymer, i.p. tirapazamine, and radiation treatments resulted in both early deaths and the highest long-term survivorship. The basis for potential toxicity is discussed. We conclude that implantable biodegradable polymers provide controlled intracranial release for treatment of experimental glioma. For treatment of malignant gliomas, the combination of continuous polymer-mediated delivery and fractionated systemic delivery of tirapazamine with external beam radiotherapy warrants further exploration.

Absorbable Implants↗

Tirapazamine-induced DNA damage measured using the comet assay correlates with cytotoxicity towards hypoxic tumour cells in vitro.

Tirapazamine (SR 4233), a bioreductive drug selectively toxic towards hypoxic cells, is presently in phase II clinical trials. Since it would not be expected that all tumours would respond equally to the drug, we are exploring ways of predicting the response of individual tumours. In this study we have tested whether the comet assay, which measures DNA damage in individual cells, can provide a simple, surrogate end point for cell killing by tirapazamine. We examined the relationship between the cytotoxicity of tirapazamine under hypoxic conditions and tirapazamine-induced DNA strand breaks in murine (SCCVII, EMT6, RIF-1) and human (HT1080, A549, HT29) tumour cell lines. These results were compared with the relationship between tirapazamine cytotoxicity and another measure of the ability of cells to metabolise tirapazamine; high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) analysis of tirapazamine loss or formation of the two electron reduction product SR 4317. The correlation between the hypoxic cytotoxic potency of tirapazamine and DNA damage was highly significant (r = 0.905, P = 0.013). A similar correlation was observed for hypoxic potency and tirapazamine loss (r = 0.812, P = 0.050), while the correlation between hypoxic potency and SR 4317 formation was not significant (r = 0.634, P = 0.171). The hypoxic cytotoxicity of tirapazamine in vitro can therefore be predicted by measuring tirapazamine-induced DNA damage using the comet assay. This approach holds promise for predicting the response of individual tumours to tirapazamine in the clinic.

Antineoplastic Agents↗

Evidence of enhanced in vivo activity using tirapazamine with paclitaxel and paraplatin regimens against the MV-522 human lung cancer xenograft.

PURPOSE: Tirapazamine (3-amino-1,2,4-benzotriazine 1,4-dioxide; SR 4233) is a bioreductive agent that exhibits relatively selective cytotoxicity towards cells under hypoxic conditions and can enhance the antitumor activity of many standard oncolytics. In the present study we examined the interaction between tirapazamine in vivo with paclitaxel and paraplatin in two- and three-way combination studies using the MV-522 human lung carcinoma xenograft model. METHODS: Agents were administered as a single i.p. bolus, with tirapazamine being given 3 h prior to paclitaxel, paraplatin, or their combination. Tumor growth inhibition (TGI), final tumor weights, partial and complete responses, and time to tumor doubling were determined after drug administration. RESULTS: Tirapazamine as a single agent was ineffective against this human lung tumor model. A substantial increase in TGI was seen in animals treated with the triple-agent regimen (tirapazamine-paclitaxel-paraplatin) compared to animals treated with double-agent regimens that did not include tirapazamine. The addition of tirapazamine to paclitaxel-paraplatin therapy resulted in a 50% complete response rate; there were no complete responses seen when only the paclitaxel-paraplatin combination was administered. Time to tumor doubling was also significantly improved with the addition of tirapazamine to the paclitaxel and paraplatin combinations. Tirapazamine did not increase the toxicity of paclitaxel, paraplatin, or their combinations as judged by its minimal impact on body weight and the fact that no toxic deaths were observed with tirapazamine-containing regimens. CONCLUSIONS: These results are important since recent studies have suggested that the combination of paclitaxel and paraplatin may be particularly active in patients with advanced stage non-small-cell lung cancer. Since tirapazamine can significantly improve efficacy, but does not appear to enhance the toxicity of paclitaxel and paraplatin, its evaluation in future clinical trials in combination with paclitaxel-paraplatin-based therapy appears warranted.

Animals↗

Measurement of delivery and metabolism of tirapazamine to tumour tissue using the multilayered cell culture model.

PURPOSE: Efficient extravascular penetration is essential for the optimal activity of most anticancer drugs and is particularly relevant to bioreductive cytotoxins which target hypoxic cells that can be located distal to functional blood vessels within tumours. Tirapazamine (3-amino-1,2,4-benzotriazine-1,4-di-N-oxide; Triazone; SR 259075; formerly SR 4233) is a lead bioreductive cytotoxin currently undergoing clinical evaluation. It exhibits preferential cytotoxicity towards cells at reduced oxygen tension, and could complement existing anticancer therapies where hypoxic cells are believed to constitute a refractory population. We assessed the ability of tirapazamine to penetrate tumour tissue using an in vitro multilayered cell culture (MCC) model. METHODS: Diffusion of tirapazamine through oxic and hypoxic multilayered cell cultures composed of SiHa. human cervical carcinoma cells, was measured using a dual reservoir diffusion apparatus from which samples were quantified via HPLC. Drug concentration kinetics from both reservoirs were analysed using a mathematical model for diffusion and metabolism within the MCC. Results were then applied to a second mathematical model which described extravascular drug penetration within a tumour cord, the sheath of cells surrounding a blood vessel. RESULTS: The diffusion coefficient of tirapazamine within SiHa MCCs was determined as 7.0+/-0.5 x 10(-7) cm2/s and the maximal metabolic rate for hypoxic MCCs, Vmax, as 1.5+/-0.4 microM/s. The thickness of individual tissue cultures was determined by diffusion of tritiated water (HTO). A linear relationship was shown to exist between tissue thickness and the inverse of permeability to HTO. Experimental results were used to simulate drug distribution within a tumour cord. These simulations indicate that, when tirapazamine is administered via intravenous infusion, a stable tirapazamine distribution throughout the cord occurs within 15 min with cells most peripheral to the blood vessel exposed to only 10% of the blood drug concentration. Under these conditions, the simulations predict cell kill to be limited to the first 75 microm of tissue surrounding a blood vessel. CONCLUSION: This study indicates that extravascular penetration of tirapazamine to peripheral cells existing at low oxygen tension may be limited by the metabolism of tirapazamine by more proximal cells existing at moderate oxygen tension. Simulations found that tirapazamine reached only 10% of the blood concentration at cells most peripheral to blood vessels. These results indicate that tirapazamine would be significantly cytotoxic only to cells located within approximately 75 microm of blood vessels. Further MCC-based modelling of extravascular drug penetration would serve as a means of identifying new antitumour agents with location-specific activity.

Algorithms↗

Electron paramagnetic resonance spectrometry evidence for bioreduction of tirapazamine to oxidising free radicals under anaerobic conditions.

Tirapazamine (SR 4233) is a bioreductive antitumour drug in Phase III clinical trial which is activated in hypoxic tumour regions to generate a cytotoxic species. Electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectrometry was used to investigate directly the formation of free radicals as the result of tirapazamine reduction by NADPH-supplemented liver microsomes. Under anaerobic conditions, the tirapazamine nitroxide free radical EPR signal was not evident over a range of rat or human liver microsomal protein (1-5 mg) concentrations. However, in combination with 1,1',5, 5'-dimethylpyrolline-1-N-oxide (DMPO), a spin trap for short-lived free radicals, tirapazamine resulted in formation of a 1:1:1:1:1:1 spectrum with hyperfine splitting A(N) = 15.8 G A(H) = 22.3 G consistent with generation of DMPO-R, a carbon-centered radical adduct. Addition of DMSO increased the signal intensity of the carbon-centred radical by at least twofold. The hyperfine splitting constants associated with DMPO-R could be indicative of a tirapazamine carbon-centred radical per se or, more likely, carbon radicals from endogenous materials (or DMSO) in the biological matrix as a result of oxidative attack by the tirapazamine primary radical. Formation of DMPO-OH, the hydroxyl radical spin adduct, by tirapazamine in the absence of air indicates that liberation of a hydroxyl radical may be a consequence of tirapazamine bioreduction under anaerobic conditions. The reactivity of tirapazamine free radicals with endogenous microsomal substances to generate reactive carbon-centred radicals indicates that tirapazamine may disrupt a wide range of cellular activities.

Anaerobiosis↗

Potentiation of cisplatin activity by the bioreductive agent tirapazamine.

PURPOSE: The chemosensitizing potential of the benzotriazine-N-oxide tirapazamine was determined in rodent mammary tumor cells grown as solid tumors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: C3H/HeJ mice bearing i.m. transplanted 16C mammary carcinomas were treated with varying doses of either cisplatin alone or cisplatin in combination with a 0.27 mmol/kg dose of tirapazamine. Tumor response to single agent or combination therapy was assessed using an in situ tumor growth delay assay. Normal tissue toxicity resulting from the tirapazamine, cisplatin, or tirapazamine plus cisplatin was determined by measuring bone marrow stem cell (CFU-GM) toxicities and blood urea nitrogen (BUN) levels. RESULTS: Tirapazamine itself had no measurable effect on the growth of this tumor. However, when administered from 3 h before to simultaneously with a single dose of cisplatin, the resultant tumor growth delay was significantly increased as compared to that seen with cisplatin alone. The administration of tirapazamine 3 h prior to a range of doses of cisplatin was found to result in a dose modifying factor (DMF) of approximately 1.7 in tumor response compared to cisplatin alone. Tirapazamine did demonstrate some hematologic toxicity on its own but it did not potentiate the toxicity of cisplatin when the two agents were administered in combination. BUN analysis showed that tirapazamine had little effect on BUN levels but did suppress the BUN values of mice treated with the combination of tirapazamine and 15 mg/kg cisplatin as compared to cisplatin alone. CONCLUSIONS: The present findings suggest that the addition of tirapazamine to cisplatin therapy may lead to a therapeutic benefit.

Animals↗

Reaction of the hypoxia-selective antitumor agent tirapazamine with a C1'-radical in single-stranded and double-stranded DNA: the drug and its metabolites can serve as surrogates for molecular oxygen in radical-mediated DNA damage reactions.

The compound 3-amino-1,2,4-benzotriazine 1,4-dioxide (1, tirapazamine; also known as SR4233, WIN 59075, and tirazone) is a clinically promising anticancer agent that selectively kills the oxygen-poor (hypoxic) cells found in tumors. When activated by one-electron enzymatic reduction, tirapazamine induces radical-mediated oxidative DNA strand cleavage. Using the ability to generate a single deoxyribose radical at a defined site in an oligonucleotide, we recently provided direct evidence that, in addition to initiating the formation of DNA radicals, tirapazamine can react with these radicals and convert them into base-labile lesions [Daniels et al. (1998) Chem. Res. Toxicol. 11, 1254-1257]. The rate constant for trapping of a C1'-radical in single-stranded DNA by tirapazamine was shown to be approximately 2 x 10(8) M(-1) s(-1), demonstrating that tirapazamine can substitute for molecular oxygen in radical-mediated DNA strand damage reactions. Because reactions of tirapazamine with DNA radicals may play an important role in its ability to damage DNA, we have further characterized the ability of the drug and its metabolites to convert a C1'-DNA radical into a base-labile lesion. We find that tirapazamine reacts with a C1'-radical in double-stranded DNA with a rate constant of 4.6 x 10(6) M(-1) s(-1). The mono-N-oxide (3) stemming from bioreductive metabolism of tirapazamine converts the C1'-radical to an alkaline-labile lesion more effectively than the parent drug. Compound 3 traps a C1'-radical in single-stranded DNA with a rate constant of 4.6 x 10(8) M(-1) s(-1) and in double-stranded DNA with a rate constant of 1.4 x 10(7) M(-)(1) s(-)(1). We have also examined the rate and mechanism of reactions between the C1'-radical and representatives from two known classes of "oxygen mimetic" agents: the nitroxyl radical 2,2,6, 6-tetramethylpiperidin-N-oxyl (4, TEMPO) and the nitroimidazole misonidazole (5). TEMPO traps the C1'-radical in single-stranded DNA (7.2 x 10(7) M(-1) s(-1)) approximately 3 times less effectively than tirapazamine, but 2 times as fast in double-stranded DNA (9.1 x 10(6) M(-1) s(-1)). Misonidazole traps the radical in single- (6. 9 x 10(8) M(-1) s(-1)) and double-stranded DNA (2.9 x 10(7) M(-1) s(-1)) with rate constants that are roughly comparable to those measured for the mono-N-oxide metabolite of tirapazamine. Finally, information regarding the chemical mechanism by which these compounds oxidize a monomeric C1'-nucleoside radical has been provided by product analysis and isotopic labeling studies.

Antineoplastic Agents↗

The effect of tirapazamine (SR-4233) alone or combined with chemotherapeutic agents on xenografted human tumours.

Recent data have shown that the in vitro and in vivo cytotoxicity of bioreductive drugs could be significantly increased when combined with chemotherapy drugs such as cisplatinum, depending on the timing of administration. The aim of this study was to define the toxicity (animal lethality) and the activity (growth delay assay, excision assay) of a bioreductive drug, tirapazamine, alone and combined with chemotherapy agents (5-FU, VP16, bleo, DTIC and c-DDP) on nude mice bearing xenografted human tumours: a rectal carcinoma (HRT18) and a melanoma (Na11+). Animal lethality was markedly increased when tirapazamine at the lethal dose 10% was combined with the other drugs. For the HRT18 tumour the combination of tirapazamine and bleomycin significantly increased the delay of regrowth compared with bleomycin alone (P = 0.04) and was more cytotoxic than tirapazamine alone (P = 0.04). For the Na11+ tumours the combination of tirapazamine with VP16 significantly increased tumour doubling time compared with the controls (P = 0.001) or VP16 alone. The combination of tirapazamine and VP16 was more cytotoxic than VP16 alone (P = 0.0001). When compared with c-DDP or tirapazamine alone, there was a significant decrease in plating efficiency when tirapazamine and c-DDP were given at the same time (P = 0.04), but not when tirapazamine was given 3 h before c-DDP. In conclusion, tirapazamine was shown to be cytotoxic against clonogenic human tumour cells. Its efficacy in vivo may depend on its combination with already active chemotherapy drugs on the tumour model used. The timing of administration may be less important than previously thought.

Adenocarcinoma↗

Tirapazamine-cisplatin: the synergy.

Tirapazamine is a novel bioreductive agent with selective cytotoxicity against hypoxic tumour cells. Synergy with cisplatin and other chemotherapeutic agents has been shown in preclinical trials. Pharmacokinetic studies of tirapazamine have revealed that exposure increases with dose over the range of 18-450 mg m(-2) for a single dose and of 9-390 mg m(-2) for multiple doses. Plasma clearance is high. Tirapazamine has been clinically tested in combination with cisplatin at escalating doses in a phase I trial and at therapeutic doses in three separate phase II trials in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in 11 study centres. Limiting toxicity for tirapazamine at an intravenous dose of 390 mg m(-2) was acute, reversible hearing loss. Other frequently observed side-effects included muscle cramping and gastrointestinal symptoms. Tirapazamine did not cause myelosuppression, and no toxic deaths were reported in these trials. The anti-tumour efficacy against previously untreated, advanced NSCLC was evaluated by cumulative intent-to-treat analysis of 132 patients. The objective response rate (confirmed by two independent measurements) was 25% [confidence interval (CI) 17.8-33.33], with a median survival of 38.9 weeks (CI 29.4-49.9). The efficacy of tirapazamine plus cisplatin shown in these trials was better than that of historical controls with cisplatin monotherapy. Two large-scale international trials have been conducted, involving more than 70 centres, to confirm these results. The CATAPULT I trial compares tirapazamine plus cisplatin with cisplatin and has finished accrual with 446 patients. The CATAPULT II trial, which is comparing tirapazamine plus cisplatin with etoposide plus cisplatin, had enrolled 550 patients by June 1997. Follow-up is ongoing. Tirapazamine is the promising first drug from a new class of cytotoxic agents with a novel mechanism of action. It can be effectively combined with cisplatin, and possibly with other agents, because of its safety profile and lack of overlapping dose-limiting toxicity, such as myelosuppression. The combination of tirapazamine and cisplatin appears to be safe and effective in the treatment of NSCLC.

Antineoplastic Agents↗

Microdialysis sampling with on-line microbore HPLC for the determination of tirapazamine and its reduced metabolites in rats.

An on-line microdialysis microbore HPLC method is described for the determination of the bioreductive anti-tumor agent, tirapazamine (3-amino-1,2,4-benzotriazine-1,4-di-N-oxide, SR4233, WIN59075, Tirazone, TPZ) and its two major reduced metabolites, 3-amino-1,2,4-benzotriazine-1-N-oxide (SR4317) and 3-amino-1,2,4-benzotriazine (SR4330). Detection limits of 0.003 microM, 0.005 microM and 0.007 microM were obtained for tirapazamine, SR4317 and SR4330, respectively. Linear ranges of 0.011-20 microM, 0.017-20 microM and 0.025-20 microM for tirapazamine, SR4317 and SR4330 permitted quantitative analysis of all three compounds in microdialysis samples. Typical intra-day reproducibilities (n = 7) of 4.1% (tirapazamine), 6.6% (SR4317), 9.9% (SR4317), and 1.8% (tirapazamine), 2.4% (SR4317) and 2.6% (SR4330) were obtained at the 0.12 microM and 1.2 microM levels, respectively. Inter-day reproducibilities (n = 5) of 3.4% (tirapazamine), 1.8% (SR4317), 4.5% (SR4330) and 2.5% (tirapazamine), 2.5% (SR4317) and 1.7% (SR4330) were obtained at the 0.12 microM and 1.2 microM levels, respectively. The use of an on-line microdialysis HPLC system, permitted the determination of tirapazamine, SR4317 and SR4330 in blood and muscle tissue of rats with a high temporal resolution of sampling. The pharmacokinetics of tirapazamine and its metabolites were studied in the muscle and blood of rats previously administered an intraperitoneal dose of tirapazamine.

Animals↗

Effect of radiation and tirapazamine (SR-4233) on three melanoma cell lines.

In this study the response of three melanoma cell lines to single doses of radiation, to the bioreductive drug tirapazamine (SR-4233) and to the combination of radiation and tirapazamine was determined. Tirapazamine is a bioreductive drug with specific cytotoxicity in hypoxic conditions. Three melanoma cell lines (MM576, MM96L and murine B16-F10) were exposed to increasing concentrations of tirapazamine to assess cytotoxicity under aerobic and hypoxic conditions. Also, clonogenic survival after single doses of 4 MV X-rays was determined under aerobic and hypoxic conditions, with and without 20 microM tirapazamine. Tirapazamine was an effective hypoxic cytotoxin in the three cell lines. The concentrations of tirapazamine causing equal cell kill were 1000 mM for aerobic cells and 50 mM for hypoxic cells. The oxygen enhancement ratios for single X-ray doses were between 2 and 3 for all the cell lines. Addition of 20 microM tirapazamine to hypoxic cells 1 h before irradiation produced the same radiosensitivity as aerobic cells. Tirapazamine had a minimal effect on the radiosensitivity of aerobic cells. Since melanomas are known to contain hypoxic cells which may reduce their radiosensitivity, these in vitro results have demonstrated the potential of tirapazamine to overcome the radioresistance of hypoxia and give encouragement for further studies.

Animals↗

Single-arm, open-label phase II study of intravenously administered tirapazamine and radiation therapy for glioblastoma multiforme.

PURPOSE: This phase II study tested the efficacy and safety of tirapazamine (Sanofi Synthelabo Research, Malvern, PA), a bioreductive agent, in glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) patients. The patients were staged according to a model constructed by a recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) of glioma patients in prior Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) trials and compared with a matched standard population, as predicted by the model. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 124 patients diagnosed with a GBM were treated with radiation therapy and intravenous tirapazamine between January 27,1995, and April 25,1997. All patients received 60 Gy in 2-Gy fractions. Tirapazamine was delivered three times a week for 12 treatments during radiotherapy. Fifty-five patients received tirapazamine at 159 mg/m(2). A second dose level, 260 mg/m(2), was opened, and 69 patients were entered. RESULTS: There was no significant survival advantage to the drug in any RPA class at either dose level. The median survival time was 10.8 months for the patient population treated with the 159-mg/m(2) dose of tirapazamine and 9.5 months for the group treated with the 260-mg/m (2) dose of tirapazamine. Survival times by RPA class for patients receiving tirapazamine at 159 mg/m(2) were 27.4 months (class III), 10.8 months (class IV), 7.9 months (class V), and 3.8 months (class VI). Survival times by RPA class for patients receiving tirapazamine at 260 mg/m(2) were 16.2 months (class III), 10.3 months (class IV), 5. 1 months (class V), and 1.3 months (class VI). Patients in RPA class III treated in the 159 mg/m(2) dose arm had a notably longer survival than patients in the RTOG database RPA class III, but the difference did not reach statistical significance. There were no fatal toxicities. Grade 3/4 toxicities were more frequent at the higher dose level. CONCLUSION: Survival in the population treated with radiation and tirapazamine was equivalent to the control population. Patients in RPA class III treated with radiation and tirapazamine at the 159-mg/m(2) dose had a longer survival when compared with the historical controls. The improvement in survival did not reach statistical significance. Toxicity was acceptable in both treatment arms, but grade 3/4 toxicities were more frequent in the higher dose regimen.

Adult↗

Tirapazamine causes vascular dysfunction in HCT-116 tumour xenografts.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Tirapazamine is a hypoxic cytotoxin currently undergoing Phase II/III clinical evaluation in combination with radiation and chemotherapeutics for the treatment of non-hematological cancers. Tissue penetration studies using multicellular models have suggested that tirapazamine exposure may be limited to cells close to blood vessels. However, animal studies show tirapazamine enhances the anti-tumour activity of radiation and chemotherapy and clinical studies with tirapazamine, so far, are promising. To investigate this apparent paradox we examined the microregional effects of tirapazamine in vivo by mapping drug effects with respect to the position of blood vessels in tumour cryosections. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Tirapazamine was administered i.p. to mice bearing HCT-116 tumours, which were excised at various times after treatment. Images of multiple-stained cryosections were overlaid to provide microregional information on the relative position of proliferating cells, hypoxia, perfusion and vasculature. RESULTS: We observed extensive and permanent vascular dysfunction in a large proportion of tumours from mice treated with tirapazamine. In the affected tumours, blood flow ceased in the centrally located tumour vessels, leaving a rim of functional vessels around the periphery of the tumour. This vascular dysfunction commenced within 24 h after tirapazamine administration and the areas affected appeared to be replaced by necrosis over the following 24-48 h. CONCLUSIONS: Because the majority of hypoxic cells are located in the center of tumours we propose that the activity of tirapazamine in vivo may be related to its effects on tumour vasculature and that its activity against hypoxic cells located distal to functional blood vessels may not be as important as previously believed.

Animals↗

Pharmacokinetics of the hypoxic cell cytotoxic agent tirapazamine and its major bioreductive metabolites in mice and humans: retrospective analysis of a pharmacokinetically guided dose-escalation strategy in a phase I trial.

Tirapazamine (3-amino-1,2,4-benzotriazine-1,4-di-N-oxide; SR 259075) is a selective hypoxic cell cytotoxic agent that is bioreductively activated in tumours to a reactive-drug free radical. Preclinically the agent has been shown to possess additive and synergistic anti-tumour activity in combination with radiotherapy and chemotherapy regimens. In the present study the pharmacokinetics and metabolism of tirapazamine were investigated in mice and patients as part of pre-clinical and phase I investigations. The objectives of this work were twofold; firstly, to evaluate retrospectively the utility of a pharmacokinetically guided dose-escalation (PGDE) strategy for tirapazamine, and secondly, to investigate if pharmacologically relevant plasma concentrations could be achieved at tolerable doses. Pharmacokinetic studies for PGDE were conducted in mice at four dose levels ranging from one-tenth of the LD10 to the LD50. The AUC at the LD10 (2932 micrograms ml-1 min) was used to determine a target AUC value of 1173 micrograms ml-1 min (equivalent to 40% of the mouse LD10 AUC) for clinical studies. A phase I study to investigate the tolerance of a single i.v. infusion of tirapazamine (once every 3 weeks) was initiated with close pharmacokinetic monitoring. The starting dose (36 mg/m2) was based on toxicity data obtained in the mouse, rat and dog. Doses were escalated by increases in the volume and duration of infusion. A retrospective analysis of the pharmacokinetic and toxicity data was then made to determine the utility of a PGDE approach. The drug exhibited a steep dose-lethality relationship in mice (LD10 294 mg/m2, LD50 303 mg/m2). The major gross toxicities were body-weight loss (15-20%), pilo-erection and hypoactivity at all dose levels. Sporadic ptosis and conjunctivitis were observed at doses of > 300 mg/m2. The plasma elimination of tirapazamine fitted a monoexponential open model, with rapid elimination from the plasma (t1/2 = 36 +/- 0.65 min) occurring at the LD10 dose of 294 mg/m2. A 10.3-fold increase in dose resulted in a 25.0-fold increase in AUC. Clinically, doses were escalated over the range of 36-450 mg/m2. Ototoxicity (tinnitus and reversible hearing loss) was dose-limiting at 450 mg/m2 and the MTD was 390 mg/m2 for this schedule. Pharmacokinetic analyses in patients revealed that the elimination of tirapazamine in patients was generally bi-phasic, with low inter-patient variability being found in clearance. A 12.5-fold increase in dose resulted in a 19.0-fold increase in AUC. There was good quantitative agreement in metabolite formation between mice and humans with respect to the two- and four-electron bioreductive metabolites. AUC values recorded for tirapazamine at the MTD of 390 mg/m2 (range 1035-1611 micrograms ml-1 min) were similar to the target AUC in mice. Importantly, these levels are consistent with the levels required for radiation-dose enhancement and effective combination with cisplatin in mice. Given (a) the similarities in plasma pharmacokinetics and metabolism observed at the target AUC/MTD in mice, rats, dogs and humans, (b) the similar degree of plasma protein binding seen between species and (c) the relatively low inter-patient variability noted in drug clearance, a successful PGDE approach should have been feasible. The results also indicate that potentially therapeutic levels of tirapazamine are achievable in patients at tolerable doses.

Animals↗

Molecular mechanisms of tirapazamine (SR 4233, Win 59075)-induced hepatocyte toxicity under low oxygen concentrations.

Previously we showed that tirapazamine (SR 4233, Win 59075) is cytotoxic towards hepatocytes under conditions of hypoxia but not in 10% or 95% oxygen and that bioreduction by DT-diaphorase or cytochrome P450 is not a major pathway. In the present study, we report that tirapazamine is highly cytotoxic to isolated rat hepatocytes maintained under 1% oxygen and the molecular cytotoxic mechanism has been elucidated. Cytotoxicity was prevented by the cytochrome P450 2E1 inhibitors phenyl imidazole, isoniazid, isopropanol or ethanol, suggesting that cytochrome P450 2E1 catalysed tirapazamine reductive bioactivation. By contrast, dicoumarol, a DT-diaphorase inhibitor, markedly increased tirapazamine-induced cytotoxicity. Cytotoxicity was also inhibited in normal but not DT-diaphorase-inactivated hepatocytes by increasing cellular NADH levels with lactate or ethanol or the mitochondrial respiratory inhibitors. Evidence that oxygen activation contributed to cytotoxicity was that glutathione oxidation occurred well before cytotoxicity ensued and that tirapazamine was more cytotoxic towards catalase- or glutathione reductase-inactivated hepatocytes. Furthermore, polyphenolic antioxidants such as quercetin, caffeic acid or purpurogallin, the radical trap Tempol or the iron chelator desferrioxamine prevented tirapazamine-mediated cytotoxicity. However, the antioxidants diphenylphenylenediamine, butylated hydroxyanisole or butylated hydroxytoluene did not prevent cytotoxicity and malonaldehyde formation was not increased, suggesting that lipid peroxidation was not important. The above results suggest that DT-diaphorase detoxifies tirapazamine whereas reduced cytochrome P450 reduces tirapazamine to a nitrogen oxide anion radical which forms cytotoxic reactive oxygen species as a result of redox cycling.

Animals↗

Phase I study of tirapazamine plus cisplatin/etoposide and concurrent thoracic radiotherapy in limited-stage small cell lung cancer (S0004): a Southwest Oncology Group study.

PURPOSE: To determine the feasibility and a recommended phase II dose of tirapazamine when combined with chemoradiotherapy in limited-stage small cell lung cancer (LSCLC). EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Concurrent chemoradiotherapy consisted of two cycles of cisplatin, etoposide, and once-daily radiation to 61 Gy. Tirapazamine (260 mg/m2) was given 1 h before cisplatin with planned dose escalation to 330 mg/m2 in the absence of dose-limiting toxicity, defined as > or =33% esophagitis (grade 3 or above). Consolidation therapy consisted of two cycles of tirapazamine (330 mg/m2), cisplatin, and etoposide. Complete responders received prophylactic cranial irradiation. RESULTS: Thirty patients were enrolled at the 260 mg/m2 tirapazamine dose. All had performance status of 0-1. By comparison with S9713, a predecessor Southwest Oncology Group study in LSCLC that used the same concurrent chemoradiotherapy without tirapazamine, the present trial showed a higher rate of grade 3-4 esophagitis (34% versus 22%), vomiting (34% versus 23%), and febrile neutropenia (7% versus 2%). The consolidation phase was relatively well tolerated, with grade 4 neutropenia in 44% and febrile neutropenia in 5% of patients. There were two treatment-related deaths: one from neutropenic fever and one from respiratory infection. The overall response rate was 80%, and the median survival was 22 months. CONCLUSIONS: Protocol-defined dose-limiting toxicity was observed at the initial tirapazamine dose, precluding dose escalation. Compared with S9713, the addition of tirapazamine increased the incidence of vomiting, neutropenia, and febrile neutropenia, although the overall toxicity profile remained acceptable. In view of the observed favorable survival, further study of tirapazamine in LSCLC is warranted.

Adult↗

Tirapazamine administered as a neoadjuvant to radiotherapy reduces metastatic dissemination.

PURPOSE: The level of hypoxia in primary tumors has been linked both clinically and experimentally to the incidence of metastases. This study was designed to address the effect of selectively targeting hypoxic cells in primary tumors on subsequent presentation of metastasis. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: The murine KHT model was used as a reproducible temporal and spatial onset of metastases is revealed following treatment of primary ( approximately 400 mm(3)) s.c. tumors with a 25 Gy radiation dose. The bioreductive drugs tirapazamine and RB6145 were administered in multiple doses before radiotherapy. RESULTS: Fractionated treatment with both tirapazamine and RB6145 significantly reduced the hypoxic fraction of the primary tumor, as assessed by pimonidazole binding, and had no effect on the overall growth rate of the primary tumor. Excision assays showed an increased level of cell kill in tirapazamine-treated versus RB6145-treated tumors consistent with tirapazamine targeting hypoxic cells at a broader range of oxygen tensions than RB6145. Tirapazamine treatment significantly reduced the presentation of metastases following radiotherapy (P = 0.003 versus saline controls) whereas RB6145 had no effect. Local control rates increased from 20% to 32% and 50% when radiation was combined with RB6145 and tirapazamine, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: These data provide direct evidence that selective targeting of hypoxic cells in primary tumors is a viable approach in the control of metastatic disease. The enhanced efficacy of tirapazamine versus RB6145 suggests that the radioresistant cells at intermediate oxygen tensions, conducive to targeting with tirapazamine but not with the more stringent bioreductive RB6145, predominate in terms of linking primary tumor hypoxia and metastases.

Animals↗