Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Tick Control”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Tick pheromones and their use in tick control.

Tick pheromones that regulate assembly, attraction/aggregation/attachment, and mating behavior have been described. Most of the compounds regulating these behaviors are purines, substituted phenols, or cholesteryl esters. Other pheromonal compounds include organic acids, hematin, or ecdysteroids. Novel devices have been developed that combine the specific compounds comprising these pheromones with an acaricide. When applied to tick-infested vegetation or directly to the body surfaces of livestock or companion animals, these devices are effective for tick control. This review summarizes the current state of knowledge of tick pheromones. In addition, this review also presents examples illustrating how devices using tick pheromones can offer effective alternatives to conventional methods for achieving tick control.

Animal Structures↗

Vaccination with 'concealed' antigens for tick control.

Ticks are responsible for substantial economic losses to the livestock industry, necessitating intensive use of chemical acoricides in many parts of the world. Problems of chemical residues, cost of acoricides, and development of resistance by ticks, have long been recognized and have helped to stimulate interest in tick control by immunological means (see Box 1). One approach has been to seek ways to enhance the natural immunity often acquired by animals in response to tick infestation. An alternative, discussed here by Peter Willadsen and David Kemp, is to vaccinate with 'concealed' tick antigens not normally encountered by the host, and so stimulate a different immune effector mechanism.

Journal Article↗

Efficiency and cost of strategic use of acaricide for tick control in N'Dama cattle in The Gambia.

The efficiency of strategic and strategic/selective applications of flumethrin spray formulation for controlling ticks were assessed, respectively, in two groups of fourteen N'Dama cattle (Group S and Group S/S) by comparison of the number of feeding ticks with thirteen untreated N'Dama cattle (Group U) over a period of 11 months (June 1996 to April 1997). During the expected peak of tick abundance, acaricide was applied fortnightly on the whole body in animals in Group S and only on the most infested body areas in cattle in Group S/S. Weight changes and skin lesions, directly associated with tick attachment, were recorded in cattle in the three groups. The costs of the two tick control schemes were estimated. Maximum level of ticks, all species together, feeding on cattle was observed in the rainy season. Both in Group S/S and Group S, cattle carried a lower (P < 0.001) number of feeding ticks than animals in Group U over the whole study period. Percentage of tick control, over the entire period of tick investigation, was satisfactory in both acaricide-treated groups, reaching 61.2 and 75.2% in Groups S/S and S, respectively. However, the proportion of control varied according to tick species or genus. Significantly lower prevalence of skin lesions was observed on the ano-genital and udder region in cattle in Group S/S (P < 0.05) and Group S (P < 0.01) in comparison with cattle in Group U. Mean amount of acaricide solution used and relative estimated cost of treatment in cattle in Group S/S were, respectively, 25- and 14-fold lower than those in cattle in Group S. At the end of the study, animals in Groups S/S and S were, respectively, 7.2 and 15.9 kg heavier than animals in Group U. The difference was statistically significant (P < 0.02) only between Groups S and U. However, the efficiency, low cost and derived benefits of the strategic/selective acaricide application scheme indicated that it might be the most cost effective.

Animals↗

Present and future technologies for tick control.

Arsenic dips were the first effective method for controlling ticks and tick-borne diseases, and were used in many parts of the world for over 50 years before resistance to the chemical became a problem. Until organochlorine products became available about 1946 as alternatives to arsenic, significant losses occurred in cattle herds exposed to arsenic-resistant tick strains. Since the discovery of organochlorines, virtually every chemical group of pesticides developed for the control of arthropods is represented among the list of products employed for the control of ticks on cattle. The evolution of tick resistance to acaricides has been a major determinant of the need for new products. The variety of procedures for treating animals with acaricides ranges from dipping cattle to injecting systemic acaricides, but regardless of the treatment method used, producers need to know and follow proper application procedures to derive maximum benefits. The possibility of stocking with cattle breeds that acquire pronounced resistance to ticks or using recombinant antigen antitick vaccines are the most promising alternatives to acaricides. Most ranchers depend completely on acaricides to control ticks, but do not have access to guidelines on how to make a profit from their tick control program or how to detect and resolve problems with resistance to acaricides. Extension programs are needed to help ranchers manage animal health problems, including how to control ticks and tick-borne diseases.

Animals↗

Acaricides in tick control in Ghana and methods of application.

A wide range of acaricides, including organophosphates, organochlorines, carbamates and synthetic pyrethroids are currently being used on livestock in Ghana. The most widely used acaricide in the country is still the organochlorine Lindane. A number of the products used to control ticks on livestock are designed and imported into the country for use as pesticides on crops. The most popular method of application is by hand dressing. Current methods of application together with the general failure to observe withdrawal period for meat and milk could be considered to constitute a significant human health risk.

Animals↗

A survey concerning cattle tick control in Queensland. 2. Managerial aspects which indirectly affect tick control.

This paper reports those findings concerning property management from the 1977-78 survey of tick control in Queensland, which could effect efficient tick control and also presents a profile of the cattle industry in the tick infested areas at the time of the survey. The average property size was 400 hectares and the average number of cattle on the properties was 726.4. Larger properties tended to have crossbred Zebu cattle. The average number of paddocks per property was 7.2. The most popular stabilised crossbred Zebu breed was Santa Gertrudis but the most common type of cattle was crossbred Zebu, which was on 30% of properties. There were negligible numbers of crossbreed Zebu cattle on dairy properties. Control of other external parasites may result in additional dippings in areas where they occur. Although fence maintenance appears to be carried out regularly it is clear that the effectivness of tick control measures, such as pasture spelling and dipping which depend on clean musters, could be affected by the occurrence of fire, floods and other natural disasters on half the properties in the tick infested areas. There is no evidence from results in the survey that attention to other farming activities (mainly cropping) prevents producers from paying sufficient attention to tick control. In fact cropping often provides the opportunity for producers to rotate cattle around pastures. Producers appear to consider the cost of tick control is a burden and they expect assistance from the Government to reduce these costs. They do not appear to have considered how they can reduce the costs themselves.

Animals↗

Strategic tick control in Burundi.

Strategic tick control is an attempt to control ticks and reduce losses in animal production due to tick infestations while decreasing the cost for this control. Tick control is understood as a necessity to achieve maximum animal production from animals raised in tick-infested areas. At the same time, it has become difficult to justify intensive, year-round tick control for local breeds and their crosses. The increasing costs of acaricides, maintenance of the infrastructures, salaries for personnel, etc. have created a tick control programme where the benefits may not be adequate to justify the expense. This has been the case in Burundi. This programme with adequate participation from the cattle owners of Burundi and organizational support from government personnel can help solve this economic problem. The strategic programme reduces the period of tick control to four months each year. Once optimal participation is achieved, this period can probably be reduced to three months (Kaiser et al., 1988). The period of treatment corresponds to when there is maximal feeding activity of adult female ticks on the bovine population within a certain region. Cattle should be treated once each week throughout the four-month period in order to prevent female tick engorgement (based on the life cycle of R. appendiculatus). This will greatly reduce the number of female ticks which are available to recycle the population of ticks in the participating area. At the same time, a certain population of ticks must be maintained in order to assure contact between the cattle, ticks, and tick-borne diseases of this particular region.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Animals↗

Communal farmers and tick control--a field study in Zimbabwe.

Intensive dipping of cattle to control ticks and tick-borne diseases precludes development of endemic stability to the latter. Alternative control strategies have been recommended which reduce the frequency of dipping and permit the expression of tick resistance and endemic stability. However, such strategies imply acceptance by cattle owners of higher tick burdens. In this study the views of a group of communal farmers to tick control are described and the impact of these views upon adoption of other strategies is discussed.

Administration, Topical↗

Entomogenous fungi as promising biopesticides for tick control.

When ticks were sealed in nylon tetrapacks and infected with the entomogenous fungi, Beauveria bassiana and Metarizium anisopliae and maintained in potted grass in the field, the fungal oil formulations (10(9) conidia per ml) induced 100% mortality in larvae of Rhipicephalus appendiculatus and Amblyomma variegatum, whereas mortalities in nymphs varied between 80-100% and in adults 80-90%. The aqueous formulations (10(9) conidia per ml) induced mortalities of 40-50% and reductions in egg hatchability of 68% (B. bassiana) and 48% (M. anisopliae) when sprayed on Boophilus decoloratus engorging on cattle. The strains of B. bassiana and M. anisopliae isolated from naturally infected ticks were also found to induce high mortalities in both R. appendiculatus and A. variegatum in tetrapacks placed in potted grass. Both aqueous and oil-based formulations were found to be effective, although the latter induced higher mortalities. These fungal strains in aqueous formulation (10(8) conidia per ml) suppressed on-host populations of adult R. appendiculatus by 80% (B. bassiana) and 92% (M. anisopliae) when sprayed on tick-infested grass once per month for a period of 6 months. The feasibility of using entomogenous fungi for tick control in the field is discussed.

Animals↗

The control of heartwater by means of tick control.

Two main methods are currently being used by farmers in the heartwater regions to control this disease in cattle and other stock, namely strategic control of ticks and total control of ticks. Some farmers make successful use of the latter method, particularly in areas which are marginal for the disease. Total tick control requires top managerial skills, which includes continual expert supervision, a relatively rare asset. The majority of farmers, often unintentionally, apply strategic control of ticks to control heartwater, either without or with vaccination against the disease. In this case the objective of tick control is to minimize "tick worry" without interfering too drastically with natural transmission of the disease. This method would make provision for natural immunization of young animals (a more uncertain method than vaccination) and the maintenance of immunity. In practice these methods appear to diminish deaths from heartwater appreciably, but do not protect all animals from the disease. Furthermore, they appear to be more effective in cattle than other stock. Although strategic control has an evolutionary background and considerable merit under African conditions, it is being applied in an empirical way because of paucity of information on the epidemiology of heartwater. More information on the infection rate in and infectivity of ticks (percentage of infected ticks) offer challenging research possibilities.

Animals↗

The use of herbal preparations for tick control in western Ethiopia.

Information on the traditional tick control methods used in Keffa, Illubabor and Wellega Provinces in western Ethiopia was obtained from 86 veterinary clinics and 865 peasant farmers through a questionnaire survey. Latexes of Euphorbia obovalifolia and Ficus brachypoda, juice of crushed leaves of Phytolaca dodecandra and Vernonia amygdalina, fruit juice of Solanum incanum, crushed seeds of Lepidium sativum mixed with fresh cattle faeces, juice of crushed leaves and bark of Calpurnea aurea and commercially available spice of Capsicum spp. mixed with butter, were used by peasant farmers to control ticks. Preliminary in vitro efficacy tests of these plant preparations were performed on engorged female Boophilus decoloratus. Preparations of Capsicum spp., E. obovalifolia, S. incanum and F. brachypoda were found to have 30-100% killing effects. Subsequently, in vivo treatment trials of these preparations were conducted using indigenous Bos indicus cattle naturally infested with ticks. Results indicate that treatments at the rate of once per day for 5 consecutive days with the latexes of E. obovalifolia and F. brachypoda can reduce tick burdens by up to 70% on cattle.

Animals↗

Tick control: thoughts on a research agenda.

Tick control is critical to the control of tick borne disease, while the direct impact of ticks on livestock productivity is also well known. For livestock, tick control today rests overwhelmingly on the twin approaches of genetics and chemical acaricides, although the disadvantages and limitations of both are recognized. The achievement of the full potential of vaccination, the application of biocontrol agents and the coordinated management of the existing technologies all pose challenging research problems. Progress in many areas has been steady over the last decade, while the acquisition of molecular information has now reached a revolutionary stage. This is likely to have immediate impact on the identification of potential antigens for improved vaccines and novel targets for acaricide action. In many circumstances, the rate limiting step in making scientific progress will remain unchanged, namely the resource constraint on evaluating these appropriately in large animals. For other approaches, such as the use of biocontrol agents, the limitation is likely to be less in the identification of suitable agents than in their delivery in an efficient and cost effective way. Our scientific understanding of the molecular basis for the tick vector-tick borne disease interaction is in its infancy but the area is both challenging and, in the long term, likely to be of great practical importance. What is arguably the most difficult problem of all remains: the translation of laboratory research into the extremely diverse parasite control requirements of farming systems in a way that is practically useful.

Animals↗

Host resistance in cattle tick control.

Cattle ticks are an important constraint on the livestock industry, particularly in tropical and subtropical areas, mainly because of the diseases they transmit and the costs of control. Conventional control is by means of acaricides; although there are still serious drawbacks, these can be minimized by a strategic approach. In this review Julio de Castro and Robin Newson look at alternatives. One is to make use of the host's innate abilities. In the simplest situation, where no control measures are applied, the animals develop their own protective immunity against ticks and tick-borne diseases (TBDs). Alternatively, breeds of cattle with naturally high resistance to ticks can be used, enhanced by selection. Methods of immunizing cattle against ticks are also under development. Ideally, ticks should be managed at an economically acceptable level by a combination of techniques, supported where necessary by vaccination against TBDs.

Journal Article↗

Tick control: further thoughts on a research agenda.

Tick control is a subject that has stimulated intense interest for more than a century. This article is a commentary on the research needs for tick control proposed in Peter Willadsen's recent article and it calls attention to tick control strategies that were either poorly represented or omitted from the latter. Special consideration is given to host-targeted devices to control disease vector ticks infesting wildlife, to pheromone-impregnated decoys for attracting and killing ticks in the natural environment and on hosts, and to more up-to-date advances in vaccine development.

Animals↗

The effect of tick control on the epidemiology of bovine babesiosis.

The effect of tick control on the infection rates of Babesia bovis and Babesia bigemina are reported for 6 geographical regions in South Africa. Under conditions of poor tick control the situation for B. bovis was one of apparent enzootic instability in the 2 regions where its presence was recorded. Under similar conditions the situation for B. bigemina was generally stable. With good tick control B. bovis infection rates were reduced to very low levels, with minimal losses being recorded. In the case of B. bigemina, good tick control reduced the infection rates in cattle but increased the risk of outbreaks. We concluded that, unless regular dipping is necessary to limit damage done by ticks per se, control of ticks is not justified economically as a means of minimizing the risks of babesiosis outbreaks in South Africa.

Animals↗