Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Superinfection exclusion”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

A virus-specified mechanism for the prevention of multiple infection--T7- and T3-mutual and superinfection exclusion.

Co- and superinfection of cells with T3/T7 result in exclusion (mutual or superinfection exclusion). The exclusion mechanism is also directed against homologous (or identical) virus. Exclusion is established after the adsorption but before the genome becomes available for gene expression or replication, that is only one virus per cell develops. The exclusion is triggered by a constituant of the viral particle. An early T7 gene (M gene) (Schweiger et al., 1975) is essential for the formation of exclusion competent virions.

Bacterial Proteins↗

Superinfection exclusion in duck hepatitis B virus infection is mediated by the large surface antigen.

Superinfection exclusion is the phenomenon whereby a virus prevents the subsequent infection of an already infected host cell. The Pekin duck hepatitis B virus (DHBV) model was used to investigate superinfection exclusion in hepadnavirus infections. Superinfection exclusion was shown to occur both in vivo and in vitro with a genetically marked DHBV, DHBV-ClaI, which was unable to establish an infection in either DHBV-infected ducklings or DHBV-infected primary duck hepatocytes (PDHs). In addition, exclusion occurred in vivo even when the second virus had a replicative advantage. Superinfection exclusion appears to be restricted to DHBV, as adenovirus, herpes simplex virus type 1, and vesicular stomatitis virus were all capable of efficiently infecting DHBV-infected PDHs. Exclusion was dependent on gene expression by the original infecting virus, since UV-irradiated DHBV was unable to mediate the exclusion of DHBV-ClaI. Using recombinant adenoviruses expressing DHBV proteins, we determined that the large surface antigen mediated exclusion. The large surface antigen is known to cause down-regulation of a DHBV receptor, carboxypeptidase D (CPD). Receptor down-regulation is a mechanism of superinfection exclusion seen in other viral infections, and so it was investigated as a possible mechanism of DHBV-mediated exclusion. However, a mutant large surface antigen which did not down-regulate CPD was still capable of inhibiting DHBV infection of PDHs. In addition, exclusion of DHBV-ClaI did not correlate with a decrease in CPD levels. Finally, virus binding assays and confocal microscopy analysis of infected PDHs indicated that the block in infection occurs after internalization of the second virus. We suggest that superinfection exclusion may result from the role of the L surface antigen as a regulator of intracellular trafficking.

Animals↗

Superinfection exclusion of alphaviruses in three mosquito cell lines persistently infected with Sindbis virus.

Three Aedes albopictus (mosquito) cell lines persistently infected with Sindbis virus excluded the replication of both homologous (various strains of Sindbis) and heterologous (Aura, Semliki Forest, and Ross River) alphaviruses. In contrast, an unrelated flavivirus, yellow fever virus, replicated equally well in uninfected and persistently infected cells of each line. Sindbis virus and Semliki Forest virus are among the most distantly related alphaviruses, and our results thus indicate that mosquito cells persistently infected with Sindbis virus are broadly able to exclude other alphaviruses but that exclusion is restricted to members of the alphavirus genus. Superinfection exclusion occurred to the same extent in three biologically distinct cell clones, indicating that the expression of superinfection exclusion is conserved among A. albopictus cell types. Superinfection of persistently infected C7-10 cells, which show a severe cytopathic effect during primary Sindbis virus infection, by homologous virus does not produce cytopathology, consistent with the idea that cytopathology requires significant levels of viral replication. A possible model for the molecular basis of superinfection exclusion, which suggests a central role for the alphavirus trans-acting protease that processes the nonstructural proteins, is discussed in light of these results.

Aedes↗

Alkylation of T7 bacteriophage blocks superinfection exclusion.

Alkylation of T7 bacteriophage by methyl methane sulfonate blocked superinfection exclusion. This blockage could be correlated with a delay in the synthesis of phage-specific proteins. Therefore we conclude that protein synthesis directed by the primary infecting phage is required for efficient exclusion of superinfecting phage particles.

Alkylation↗

Dual mechanisms of pestiviral superinfection exclusion at entry and RNA replication.

For many viruses, primary infection has been shown to prevent superinfection by a homologous second virus. In this study, we investigated superinfection exclusion of bovine viral diarrhea virus (BVDV), a positive-sense RNA pestivirus. Cells acutely infected with BVDV were protected from superinfection by homologous BVDV but not with heterologous vesicular stomatitis virus. Superinfection exclusion was established within 30 to 60 min but was lost upon passaging of persistently infected cells. Superinfecting BVDV failed to deliver a translatable genome into acutely infected cells, indicating a block in viral entry. Deletion of structural protein E2 from primary infecting BVDV abolished this exclusion. Bypassing the entry block by RNA transfection revealed a second block at the level of replication but not translation. This exclusion did not require structural protein expression and was inversely correlated with the level of primary BVDV RNA replication. These findings suggest dual mechanisms of pestivirus superinfection exclusion, one at the level of viral entry that requires viral glycoprotein E2 and a second at the level of viral RNA replication.

Animals↗

Superinfection exclusion by bacteriophage T7.

Only two of the early genes of bacteriophage T7 were found to play a significant role in exclusion of superinfecting bacteriophage T3 particles; genes 0.3 and 1. Protein synthesis by the preinfecting phage particle was not required for efficient exclusion. These findings are discussed with regard to the known functions of these genes during T7 development.

Antibiosis↗

Cellular mechanisms in the superinfection exclusion of vesicular stomatitis virus.

The superinfection exclusion of VSV has been studied and found to be caused by a combination of three distinct effects on endocytosis by VSV-infected cells: first, a decreased rate of formation of endocytic vesicles as judged by an inhibition of fluid-phase uptake at 2 hr postinfection; second, a decreased rate of internalization of receptor-bound ligands, which was detected at 4 hr postinfection; and third, a competition with newly synthesized virus for occupancy of coated pits, as indicated by electron microscopy of infected cells. At the same time that fluid-phase uptake decreased, numerous uncoated invaginations were observed at the cell surface.

Animals↗

Superinfection exclusion by incomplete genomes of bacteriophage T4.

The genetic basis of superinfection exclusion by bacteriophage T4 was investigated by using incomplete genomes derived from the gene 66 mutant E920g. Incomplete genomes, which included a region of T4 between genes 42 and 44, were able to exclude superinfecting phage with an efficiency similar to that of complete genomes. Those genomes which did not include this region were unable to exclude superinfecting phage. A mutant with reduced ability to exclude super-infecting phage was isolated after mutagenesis with hydroxylamine. The mutation maps midway between amN122 in gene 42 and amB22 in gene 43. The efficiency of exclusion of superinfecting phage (as measured by the percentage of superinfected cells which failed to release any phage carrying selected markers of the superinfecting phage) by this mutant was 50 to 60%, whereas for wild type it was 85 to 95%. Uptake of (3)H-leucine by cells infected with the mutant was inhibited by superinfection with ghosts and it has therefore been designated imm1, for lack of immunity to superinfecting phage and ghosts. The formation of infective centers by cells infected with imm1 or another imm(-) mutant (imm2) was not inhibited by superinfection with ghosts.

Alleles↗

Superinfection exclusion (sieB) genes of bacteriophages P22 and lambda.

The superinfection exclusion gene (sieB) of Salmonella phage P22 was mapped with phage deletion mutants. The DNA sequence in the region was reexamined in order to find an open reading frame consistent with the deletion mapping. Several discrepancies with the previously published sequence were discovered. The revised sequence revealed a single open reading frame of 242 codons with six likely translation initiation codons. On the basis of deletion and amber mutant phenotypes, the second of these six sites was inferred to be the translation initiation site of the sieB gene. The sieB gene encodes a polypeptide with 192 amino acid residues with a calculated molecular weight of 22,442, which is in reasonable agreement with that estimated from polyacrylamide gels. The transcription start site of sieB was identified by the use of an RNase protection assay. The sieB promoter thus identified was inactivated by a 2-base substitution in its -10 hexamer. The sieB gene of coliphage lambda was also identified. The promoter for lambda sieB was identified by homology to that of P22 sieB.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Superinfection exclusion by heteroimmune corynebacteriophages.

Superinfection of Corynebacterium diphtheriae C7(beta) by heteroimmune phage gamma is productive, whereas superinfection by gamma-bin mutants is for the most part nonproductive. Exclusion of gamma-bin phage occurred after its DNA had penetrated and was partially expressed in the heteroimmune lysogen. All of the infected cells were killed, and lysis was observed. The beta inhibitor causing exclusion was produced during the prophage state and appeared to be distinct from immune repressor. The ability of gamma-bin phage to superinfect C7(beta) productively could be restored by recombination with beta phage, indicating that both beta and gamma phages contain either indentical or similar alleles of the bin gene. The bin gene was mapped by vegetative and prophage crosses and found to be located in the region of the phage genome concerned with regulation. Both beta and gamma wild-type phages induced the resident prophage in a significant fraction of superinfeted heteroimmune lysogens. This, coupled with the fact that induction of C7(beta) abolished exclusion, suggests that the bin gene product acts as antirepressor, i.e., it reduces the level of heteroimmune repressor either directly or indirectly. The gamma-bin mutants either failed to produce antirepressor or did so with reduced efficiency. Antirepressor activity was negatively controlled by homoimmune repressor. The isolation of beta mutants that appeared bin-like suggests that beta and gamma phages contain homologous systems of exclusion and antiexclusion. Exclusion of gamm-bin by beta phage in gram-positive C. diphtheriae exhibited striking parallels to the sieB exclusion described for phages P22 and lambda in gram-negative organisms. The extended similarities of these coryngephages to lambda bacteriophage is noted.

Bacteriophages↗

Absence of superinfection exclusion during asynchronous reovirus infections of mouse, monkey, and human cell lines.

Reovirus is a gastroenteric virus with a genome that consists of ten segments of double-stranded RNA. The segmented nature of the genome allows for genetic mixing when cells are simultaneously infected with two different viral serotypes. The ability of viral reassortment to take place in asynchronous infections has not previously been investigated with mammalian reoviruses. In this study, five different cell lines, representing mouse, monkey, and human, were infected synchronously or asynchronously with various sets of two different temperature-sensitive (ts) reovirus mutants in order to study the genetic interactions which occur. Recombinant viruses were detected at high frequency when infection by the two different ts mutants was separated by as much as 24 h, suggesting that superinfection exclusion does not play a role in reovirus mixed infections. The apparent lack of superinfection exclusion in reovirus infections may have important implications in its evolution.

Animals↗

The ltp gene of temperate Streptococcus thermophilus phage TP-J34 confers superinfection exclusion to Streptococcus thermophilus and Lactococcus lactis.

The ltp gene, located within the lysogeny module of temperate Streptococcus thermophilus phage TP-J34, has been shown to be expressed in lysogenic strain S. thermophilus J34. It codes for a lipoprotein, as demonstrated by inhibition of cleavage of the signal sequence by globomycin. Exposure of Ltp on the surface of Lactococcus lactis protoplasts bearing a plasmid-encoded copy of ltp has been demonstrated by immunogold labeling and electron microscopy. Expression of ltp in prophage- and plasmid-cured S. thermophilus J34-6f interfered with TP-J34 infection. While plating efficiency was reduced by a factor of about 40 and lysis of strain J34-6f in liquid medium was delayed considerably, phage adsorption was not affected at all. Intracellular accumulation of phage DNA was shown to be inhibited by Ltp. This indicates interference of Ltp with infection at the stage of triggering DNA release and injection into the cell, indicating a role of Ltp in superinfection exclusion. Expression of ltp in L. lactis Bu2-60 showed that the same superinfection exclusion mechanism was strongly effective against phage P008, a member of the lactococcal 936 phage species: no plaque-formation was detectable with even 10(9) phage per ml applied, and lysis in liquid medium did not occur. In Lactococcus also, Ltp apparently inhibited phage DNA release and/or injection. Ltp appears to be a member of a family of small, secreted proteins with a 42 amino acids repeat structure encoded by genes of Gram-positive bacteria. Some of these homologous genes are part of the genomes of prophages.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Superinfection exclusion by T-even-type coliphages.

When a bacterial cell is infected with a T-even coliphage, immunity to a superinfecting phage is rapidly established (superinfection exclusion). Two phage-encoded proteins, Imm and Sp, are responsible for this exclusion: Imm blocks DNA transfer across the plasma membrane and partially inhibits release of DNA from the superinfecting virion, and Sp inhibits local degradation of bacterial murein by a phage-associated lysozyme.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Requirement of protein synthesis for bacteriophage phi X174 superinfection exclusion.

Within 5 to 10 min at 37 C, bacteria infected by bacteriophage phiX174 acquire the ability to exclude superinfecting phiX particles from reproducing themselves. The superinfecting phage are blocked at a stage prior to synthesis of the parental replicative form molecule; the superinfecting deoxyribonucleic acid remains as intact (infective) single strands. Establishment of superinfection exclusion and its maintenance require protein synthesis.

Bacteria↗

Superinfection exclusion and changes in cellular transport processes in phage infected Salmonella typhimurium.

The changes induced by bacteriophage P22 in the cellular transport process(es) of the host Salmonella typhimurium (Taneja et al., 1975; Khandekar et al., 1975; Bandyopadhyay and Chakravorty, 1976) involve interactions between the superinfection exclusion system of the resident prophage and the C immunity region of the superinfecting phage. The sie A gene of the prophage interferes with the changes in the cellular transport process induced by the superinfecting phage. However, if the superinfecting phage carries active C1 and C2 genes there is no such interference. Thus the C1 and C2 genes of the superinfecting phage seem to be expressed in the sieA+ lysogen.

Biological Transport↗

The superinfection exclusion gene (sieA) of bacteriophage P22: identification and overexpression of the gene and localization of the gene product.

Previous work has shown that the sieA gene of Salmonella bacteriophage P22 is located between the genes mnt and 16. We cloned DNA fragments of the region into multicopy vectors and tested the transformants for mediating superinfection exclusion. Subcloning, phenotypical tests, and DNA sequencing resulted in the identification of the sieA gene. There are two possible initiation codons within one open reading frame of 492 or 480 bp. The deduced amino acid sequence leads to a hypothetical polypeptide with a calculated molecular mass of 18.8 or 18.3 kDa, respectively. According to three hydrophobic regions, all of which are long enough to span the membrane, the product of sieA should be a protein of the inner membrane of a P22-lysogenic cell of Salmonella typhimurium. The SieA protein was moderately overproduced from an expression vector in cultures of Escherichia coli and could be recovered from the membrane fraction.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

The superimmunity gene sim of bacteriophage P1 causes superinfection exclusion.

Previous work has shown that the sim gene of bacteriophage P1, if cloned into a multicopy vector, confers immunity against P1 infection to cells. We show that a 1.85-kb DNA fragment from the sim region of P1 (in the multicopy plasmid pMK4) expresses immunity and encodes three proteins with molecular weights of about 25, 24, and 15 kDa. Deletion of 650 bp from the sim region abolished synthesis of all three proteins and of the sim phenotype. Expression of sim did not prevent adsorption of P1 to cells. Successful transfection with linear P1 DNA suggests that the recombinational circularization of P1 DNA is not inhibited in the presence of sim. Plasmid pMK4 and a P1 prophage can be stably maintained in the cell indicating that replication of the prophage is not disturbed by sim. The prophage can be induced in the presence of sim. This shows that the sim phenotype is not caused by preventing lytic replication or phage maturation. In cells with pMK4 there is no expression of genes from infecting phages and transduction frequency is drastically reduced. We suggest that sim functions as a superinfection exclusion system by preventing transfer of DNA from the adsorbed phages into the cytoplasm.

Cloning, Molecular↗