Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Stroke Rehabilitation”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed2005

Opening the black box of post-stroke rehabilitation: stroke rehabilitation patients, processes, and outcomes.

DeJong G, Horn SD, Conroy B, Nichols D, Healton EB. Opening the black box of post-stroke rehabilitation: stroke rehabilitation patients, processes, and outcomes. This article introduces the journal's supplement devoted to the methods and findings of the 7-site Post-Stroke Rehabilitation Outcomes Project (PSROP), a study designed to provide a very granular in-depth understanding of stroke rehabilitation practice and how practice is related to outcomes. The article summarizes current knowledge about the effectiveness of post-stroke rehabilitation, outlines where the PSROP fits into the broader traditions of stroke rehabilitation outcomes research, underscores the study's methodologic innovations, and summarizes the scope of the articles that follow.

Clinical Trials as Topic↗
PubMed1994

Stroke rehabilitation. 5. Stroke outcome.

This self-directed learning module highlights outcome after stroke rehabilitation. Part of the chapter on stroke rehabilitation in the Self-Directed Medical Knowledge Program for practitioners and trainees in physical medicine and rehabilitation, this article contains sections on predictors of stroke outcome; the ability of stroke rehabilitation to achieve functional improvement, maintain functional gains, and reduce costs; and the efficacy of varying levels of rehabilitation services.

Activities of Daily Living↗
PubMed2001

The COSTAR wheelchair study: a two-centre pilot study of self-propulsion in a wheelchair in early stroke rehabilitation. Collaborative Stroke Audit and Research.

OBJECTIVE: It is uncertain whether self-propulsion in a wheelchair should be encouraged or discouraged in the early stages of stroke rehabilitation. DESIGN: A two-centre pilot study to assess the feasibility of performing a multicentre randomized controlled trial on this subject. SETTING: Clatterbridge and Aintree Stroke Rehabilitation Units, Merseyside, UK. SUBJECTS: Forty early stroke patients (mean age 67 years) in whom it was uncertain whether self-propulsion in a wheelchair should be encouraged were studied. INTERVENTION: A central randomization service at Newcastle University was used to determine the policy about wheelchair provision and use for each patient. They were allocated to either an 'encouraged to self-propel' or a 'discouraged from self-propulsion group'. OUTCOME MEASURES USED: Independent outcome assessment was performed by postal questionnaire and telephone interview using the Barthel ADL Scale, Nottingham Extended ADL Scales and the shortened General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-12) at 3 and 12 months. Patient's length of stay and their Ashworth tone score were also measured either at three months or when they were discharged from hospital. RESULTS: After considerable preparation time it was possible to conduct a trial on self-propulsion in early stroke rehabilitation in the two-pilot centres. No major differences were found between the pilot groups for any of the outcome measures. CONCLUSIONS: A multicentre randomized controlled trial to assess this question is feasible but further work is being conducted before proceeding, to satisfy the concerns expressed to our group regarding the appropriateness of the intervention and the outcome measures.

Aged↗
PubMed1999

Stroke rehabilitation. 4. Stroke outcome and psychosocial consequences.

This self-directed learning module highlights recent research in assessment of stroke outcomes and management of the psychosocial consequences of stroke. It is a part of the chapter on stroke rehabilitation in the Self-Directed Physiatric Education Program for practitioners and trainees in physical medicine and rehabilitation. This article discusses predictive factors for mortality and functional recovery; proposed case mix adjustment and prospective payment systems for stroke rehabilitation; continuum of care and utilization of acute, nursing home, outpatient and home health rehabilitation programs; reintegration and socialization after stroke; vocational rehabilitation of stroke patients; and management of the psychosocial effects of stroke on patients and families.

Aged↗
PubMed1997

Stroke rehabilitation.

Stroke is the leading cause of brain damage and resultant disability. Rehabilitation measures help to restore lost abilities, improve quality of life and decrease the long-term economic cost of stroke. Proper patient selection, realistic goal setting, the active participation of both the patient and family, and the use of an interdisciplinary team approach are important for the success of stroke rehabilitation. Functional demand and intensive training are believed to trigger central nervous system reorganization, which is responsible for late functional recovery after stroke. The outcome following a stroke is most likely to be positive when patients have bladder and bowel continence, are able to feed themselves and have a healthy and caring spouse. Stroke rehabilitation must include the prevention or early diagnosis of medical complications as well as patient and family education concerning the prevention of recurrent stroke.

Cerebrovascular Disorders↗
PubMed2006

Noninvasive brain stimulation in stroke rehabilitation.

Stroke is a common disorder that produces a major burden to society, largely through long-lasting motor disability in survivors. Recent studies have broadened our understanding of the processes underlying recovery of motor function after stroke. Bilateral motor regions of the brain experience substantial reorganization after stroke, including changes in the strength of interhemispheric inhibitory interactions. Our understanding of the extent to which different forms of reorganization contribute to behavioral gains in the rehabilitative process, although still limited, has led to the formulation of novel interventional strategies to regain motor function. Transcranial magnetic (TMS) and DC (tDCS) electrical stimulation are noninvasive brain stimulation techniques that modulate cortical excitability in both healthy individuals and stroke patients. These techniques can enhance the effect of training on performance of various motor tasks, including those that mimic activities of daily living. This review looks at the effects of TMS and tDCS on motor cortical function and motor performance in healthy volunteers and in patients with stroke. Both techniques can either enhance or suppress cortical excitability, and may move to the clinical arena as strategies to enhance the beneficial effects of customarily used neurorehabilitative treatments after stroke.

Animals↗
PubMed2005

Antihypertensive medication usage during stroke rehabilitation: the Post-Stroke Rehabilitation Outcomes Project (PSROP).

Blood pressure management is an important issue for the primary prevention, acute management, and secondary prevention of a stroke. Rehabilitation professionals need to consider the timing in lowering blood pressures in stroke survivors, the types of medications that should be used in managing hypertension, and the target pressures to achieve. The Post-Stroke Rehabilitation Outcomes Project (PSROP) database was used to describe the types of antihypertensive medications prescribed to stroke survivors, compare prescription patterns with current practice guidelines of the management of hypertension after a stroke, and determine whether systolic and diastolic blood pressures decrease during admissions to inpatient rehabilitation facilities (IRFs). Of the 1,161 patients in the PSROP database, the most commonly prescribed antihypertensive medications were the angiotensin-converting enzyme antagonists and angiotensin II antagonists, followed by beta-blockers, calcium-channel blockers and diuretics, adrenergics (alpha-blockers), and other (minoxidil, hydralazine) medications. Systolic, diastolic, and mean arterial pressures declined in participants during admissions to IRFs. However, blood pressures were significantly higher throughout IRF stays in participants receiving antihypertensive medications when compared to those not receiving antihypertensive medications. Rehabilitation professionals need to be cognizant of the relationship between stroke and hypertension, clinical practice guidelines that provide evidence-based management tools for hypertension, and patient issues that may hinder the effective treatment of hypertension.

Aged↗
PubMed2005

Usage of pain medications during stroke rehabilitation: the Post-Stroke Rehabilitation Outcomes Project (PSROP).

Pain remains one of the most common, yet most challenging, medical problems in health care today, and it is one of the most common complications that occurs after a stroke. Pain can affect the course of stroke rehabilitation adversely, and it occasionally may be a cause for transfer back to an acute care hospital. The Post-Stroke Rehabilitation Outcomes Project (PSROP) database was used to describe the incidence of pain by body location and trends in the use of different classifications of medications to treat pain. Of the 1,122 participants in the PSROP database, the most common locations of pain in stroke survivors were the head, leg, back, and shoulder. The most frequently prescribed classifications of pain medications were other analgesics (acetaminophen and tramadol), followed by narcotic analgesics, non-steroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), anticonvulsants, and tricyclic antidepressants. After acetaminophen, the most frequently prescribed medications in each classification, respectively, include hydrocodone APAP, cox-2 inhibitors, gabapentin, and amitriptyline. Other frequently prescribed pain medications included sumatriptan (migraine analgesic), cyclobenzaprine (muscle relaxant), and baclofen (antispasticity muscle relaxant). Medications should be chosen based upon the medical condition causing pain, the ability of the stroke survivor to comply with administration of the medication, and the cost of the medication. Appropriate and timely treatments of painful conditions result in maximum function and the ability to lead active lives and maintain an adequate quality of life.

Aged↗
PubMed1997

The role of leisure in stroke rehabilitation.

Stroke patients often fail to resume full lives, even if they make a good physical recovery, and social and leisure pursuits show a particular decline. The usual goals of rehabilitation are mobility and independence in self-care, but recovery in a broader sense may be impeded if health professionals concentrate exclusively on these. Leisure has been shown to be closely associated with life satisfaction and would be a worthwhile, and now measurable, goal of rehabilitation. Elderly people show a decline in leisure activity which has been studied extensively and may provide a useful model for the more rapid decline seen in stroke patients. Further research is needed to confirm the finding that specialized occupational therapy can be effective in raising leisure activity, and to show whether this will translate into improved psychological well-being.

Cerebrovascular Disorders↗
PubMed2005

Neurostimulant medication usage during stroke rehabilitation: the Post-Stroke Rehabilitation Outcomes Project (PSROP).

Motor recovery after a stroke depends upon many upon different modalities. Intensive therapy using compensatory and facilitatory techniques is the primary method to improve movement and function in affected extremities. However, medications used to modulate neurotransmitters may be useful in augmenting therapy approaches. The Post-Stroke Rehabilitation Outcomes Project (PSROP) database was used to describe the frequency of prescribing neurostimulant medications; the types of neurostimulant medications used; and how the use of neurostimulant medications affected rehabilitation length of stay, motor recovery, cognitive recovery, and discharge destination. Of the 1,161 patients in the PSROP database, 929 (80.0%) patients did not receive any treatment with methylphenidate, modafinil, levodopa, amantadine, or bromocriptine. Patients who received neurostimulant medications did not have any more significant changes in length of stay, motor recovery, cognitive recovery, or discharge destination than patients who did not receive neurostimulant medications. Much research needs to be completed before clinicians know precisely whether and how rehabilitation therapies and medications interact to assist in functional recovery.

Aged↗
PubMed1992

Stroke rehabilitation.

Stroke produces impairments, disabilities and handicap. At each level attention may be directed at methods of assessment, monitoring or predicting outcome, and evaluating effects of treatment. There has been a change in emphasis from impairment to disability and handicap. The most informative research has been directed at evaluating rehabilitation effectiveness.

Activities of Daily Living↗
PubMed2005

Antiplatelet and anticoagulant medication usage during stroke rehabilitation: the Post-Stroke Rehabilitation Outcomes Project (PSROP).

Secondary prevention of strokes is an important issue during the admission to the inpatient rehabilitation facility (IRF). There are many clinical practice guidelines with strong levels of evidence that address the secondary prophylaxis of strokes. The Post-Stroke Rehabilitation Outcomes Project (PSROP) database was used to describe the frequency that antiplatelet and/or anticoagulant medications are prescribed for the secondary prophylaxis of a stroke. Of the 1,161 participants in the PSROP, 890 (76.66%) had nonhemorrhagic strokes. Of the participants with nonhemorrhagic strokes, 169 (18.99%) did not receive any antiplatelet or anticoagulant medication. Of 717 participants who did not have an embolic event, 140 (19.5%) did not receive a salicylate, antiplatelet agent, or warfarin. Of 173 participants who had an embolic event, 29 (16.8%) did not receive a salicylate, antiplatelet agent, or warfarin. Unless patients have any medical contraindications to these medications, they should receive these evidence-based treatments for secondary stroke prophylaxis. As more stroke survivors receive antiplatelet and/or anticoagulant medications, it is more likely that the incidence of recurrent strokes will decrease.

Aged↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Cross-validation of a model predicting discharge home after stroke rehabilitation. Validating stroke discharge predictors.

A new sample of 116 stroke patients was collected in order to validate a logistic regression model, predicting the chances of severely affected stroke patients being discharged home to independent living. The model was found to be accurate in the new sample, especially for those patients who had a high estimated probability of being discharged home. When the dividing line for the predicted probability for discharge home was set at a value of >/=0.5, the positive and negative predictive values were 74 and 73%, respectively. Further modelling resulted in a new extended model including the variables postural stability on admission, cohabiting, age and perceptual impairment on admission that formed the basis for an index predicting discharge home. This index was then validated in the sample of 93 patients that the first developed model was derived from and showed positive and negative predictive values of 85 and 77%, respectively.

Activities of Daily Living↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Stroke rehabilitation: assessing stroke survivors' long-term learning needs.

What are the long-term learning needs of stroke survivors who must adapt to living with stroke-related disabilities? A broad-based educational needs assessment was conducted to find answers to this question and to gain insight into the concerns and challenges facing stroke survivors who have returned to living in the community. Stroke survivors, family members, and rehabilitation healthcare professionals were surveyed; positive responses strongly indicated that there was interest in learning more about the selected topics. Although there was congruence across all groups, healthcare professionals indicated that they felt more strongly than either patients or patients' family members that stroke survivors need to learn more about the facts and statistics of strokes. Stroke survivors and family members indicated a stronger interest in learning about complementary therapies such as massage, acupuncture, and the role of food and vitamins. Time since stroke was an influencing factor for both stroke survivors and family members in their responses to how strongly they wanted to learn about various topics. The findings from this needs assessment formed the basis for an educational course that uses a holistic approach to address the physical, emotional, social, economic, and spiritual aspects of adapting to living with stroke-related disabilities.

Adult↗
PubMed2007

Inpatient stroke rehabilitation: a comparative study of admission criteria to stroke rehabilitation units in four European centres.

OBJECTIVE: To explore the clinical and non-clinical factors involved in decision-making concerning admission to European stroke rehabilitation units. DESIGN: Observational study on case-mix at intake combined with questionnaires and semi-structured interviews with the medical consultants of each European stroke rehabilitation unit. PATIENTS AND SETTINGS: Clinical data on 532 first-ever patients after stroke. Medical consultants from 6 European stroke rehabilitation units in 4 European countries (UK, Belgium, Germany and Switzerland). METHODS: Standardized clinical assessments within 2 days after admission. Questionnaires to each medical consultants followed by a qualitative round of semi-structured interviews. RESULTS: Case-mix of patients after stroke was significantly different between European stroke rehabilitation units. Clinical criteria for admission were seldom explicit and were evaluated differently between the European stroke rehabilitation units. In the UK units, diagnosis of stroke was the only criterion for admission. In the Belgian, German and Swiss units, pre-morbid conditions were taken into account in admission decisions. The likelihood of discharge home was considered highly important in the Swiss units. CONCLUSION: Case-mix differences at intake could be linked to different appraisals of clinical and non-clinical factors of patients after stroke. The findings urge us to be more explicit about decision-making processes at admission in order to provide a more comprehensive insight into the interplay between context and process of care.

Belgium↗
PubMed2000

Efficiency and effectiveness of stroke rehabilitation after first stroke.

PURPOSE: To investigate predictive variables of rehabilitation efficiency and achievement of rehabilitation potential following stroke rehabilitation. METHODS: We prospectively studied 110 first-stroke patients consecutively admitted to the inpatient rehabilitation department of our university hospital from 1 January to 31 December 1997. Functional recovery was measured as improvement in the ability to perform the Functional Independence Measure (FIM) instrument. Major medical (side of paralysis, stroke etiology, risk factors, Brunnstrom motor recovery stage, etc.), rehabilitative (initial FIM subscore, interval from stroke onset to rehabilitation commencement, rehabilitation stay, etc.), and demographic (age, years of education, occupation, marital and living status, care-giver, etc.) variables were examined. RESULTS: The mean FIM score was 57.7 +/- 24.5 at admission and 77.3 +/- 26.3 at discharge. The mean rehabilitation efficiency (0.7 +/- 0.7) and effectiveness (30.6 +/- 24.0%) of stroke rehabilitation were determined. Rehabilitation efficiency and rehabilitation effectiveness were significantly predicted by length of stay and arm motor recovery stage, and by age and arm motor recovery stage, respectively. The variance explained only 21% of the rehabilitation efficiency and 24% of the achievement of rehabilitation potential. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that the large proportion of the unexplained variance in rehabilitation efficiency and effectiveness is due to nonmedical factors influencing the selection of patients for rehabilitation.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Research gaps in stroke rehabilitation.

The Stroke Rehabilitation Evidence-Based Review was designed to be a comprehensive review of the stroke rehabilitation literature. Despite a wealth of research, which included 272 randomized controlled trials (RCTs), many research questions remained unanswered. In the absence of strong evidence (at least two RCTs confirming the efficacy of a treatment), a research gap was identified. These gaps, in areas of research rehabilitation research considered to be of clinical significance, are presented in this article as unanswered research questions.

Clinical Trials as Topic↗