Results for “Spouses”

PubMed2026

Effects of Cognitive Behavioral Couple Therapy With Integrated Mindfulness on Mindful Attention, Depressive Symptoms, and Dyadic Adjustment in Low-Income Couples: A Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial.

Psychosocial distress can exacerbate marital conflict, maladjustment, and mental health vulnerability. This pilot randomized clinical trial examined cognitive-behavioral couple therapy (CBCT) integrated with mindfulness in low-income Brazilian couples (per-capita household income up to one minimum wage). Thirty-four participants (17 heterosexual couples) were randomized (independent computer-generated sequence) to an experimental (n = 16) or waitlist control group (n = 18). We assessed dyadic adjustment, mindful attention, marital social skills, and depressive symptoms (R-DAS, MAAS, IHSC, BDI-II) at baseline, post-treatment, and 3-month follow-up. The intervention was eight 80-min conjoint sessions plus daily home exercises. Time × group effects favored the experimental group for dyadic adjustment, mindful attention, and depressive symptoms (all p < 0.001, = 0.20-0.37), but not marital social skills (p = 0.14). Because two outcomes differed at baseline, effects were confirmed with baseline- and dependence-adjusted sensitivity analyses. These findings provide preliminary evidence that CBCT with mindfulness may benefit disadvantaged couples.

Adult↗

PubMed2026

Music therapy in artificial insemination by husband: Effects on psychological distress and clinical pregnancy rate.

BACKGROUND: Infertility treatment can be psychologically burdensome. Evidence on music listening during artificial insemination by husband (AIH) remains limited. We evaluated whether a standardized periprocedural music intervention reduced psychological distress and explored its association with clinical pregnancy. METHODS: In this single-center, open-label randomized trial, 254 women undergoing AIH were allocated 1:1 to routine care or routine care plus two 30-minute music-listening sessions, immediately before and after AIH. The prespecified primary outcome was the continuous 21-item Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS-21) score at follow-up; clinical pregnancy was secondary. DASS-21 was completed at baseline and at day 35 after AIH. Clinical pregnancy was assessed by ultrasonography at days 30 to 35. RESULTS: Continuous DASS-21 anxiety, depression, and stress scores did not differ between groups after adjustment for baseline scores (all P ≥ .868). Absolute postintervention differences were 0.01 point or less for anxiety and depression and 0.08 point for stress, indicating neither statistical nor clinically meaningful improvement. Clinical pregnancy occurred in 34/127 participants (26.77%) in the intervention group and 14/127 (11.02%) in the control group (exploratory secondary outcome; P = .001). CONCLUSION: The intervention did not improve the primary psychological outcome. The higher clinical pregnancy rate is hypothesis-generating because the trial was not powered for pregnancy, the proposed psychological mechanism was not demonstrated, and nonspecific attention and other unmeasured factors cannot be excluded. Replication using an attention-matched control, immediate state-anxiety and physiological measures, participant-preference assessment, and live-birth follow-up is required.

Humans↗