Search PubMedSearch

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Somatic SNV prioritization”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

1 recordsLinked to original sources

SeqQC-former: A sequence-quality fusion framework for QC-aware review prioritization of candidate somatic SNVs in cancer genomics.

The accurate prioritization of candidate somatic single-nucleotide variants (SNVs) remains a challenge due to the substantial variability in sequencing quality across genomic loci. SeqQC-Former is a sequence-quality fusion framework that integrates the local nucleotide context with read-level quality-control (QC) covariates derived from matched tumor-normal sequencing data. This integration generates QC-aware prioritization scores for the downstream review of candidate variants. Unlike conventional variant callers, SeqQC-Former is designed not to infer biological truth but to support post-calling review and prioritization under heterogeneous sequencing conditions. The framework was trained and evaluated on a SEQC2-derived dataset comprising 89,447 candidate loci, including 1378 positive and 88,069 negative loci. In chromosome-held-out validation, which aims to reduce potential genomic-position leakage, SeqQC-Former demonstrated strong discrimination (AUROC = 0.9479; AUPRC = 0.9448), indicating good generalization to previously unseen chromosomes. Given that the SEQC2-derived labels contain QC-associated information; these results should be interpreted as an evaluation of QC-aware prioritization capability rather than an independent validation of biological variant correctness. Ablation analyses revealed that structured QC covariates provided the dominant predictive signal under the current SEQC2-derived labeling regime. SeqQC-Former achieved a significantly higher AUROC than classical machine-learning baselines, as determined by DeLong's test (p&#x202f;<&#x202f;0.01). Application to 53,164 glioblastoma variants demonstrated that external predictions were sensitive to QC scaling and threshold selection, underscoring that model outputs should be interpreted as QC-dependent prioritization scores rather than calibrated probabilities or definitive biological classifications. Overall, SeqQC-Former offers a reproducible post-calling QC-aware prioritization framework for large-scale somatic SNV review and underscores the importance of explicitly modeling sequencing-quality information when interpreting structured cancer genomics datasets.

Humans