SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Scarf osteotomy”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

SourceResearch connectionFrom yearThrough year

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

4 recordsLinked to original sources

PubMed2026

K-wire versus screw fixation in Scarf-Akin osteotomy for hallux valgus: A retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Retention of metal implants after Scarf-Akin osteotomy (SAO) may cause irritation and psychological discomfort, often necessitating a hardware removal procedure. This study aimed to introduce K-wire fixation, allowing for outpatient removal, and to compare it with screw fixation. METHODS: This retrospective study included 64 patients with hallux valgus, comprising 32 in the K-wire fixation group and 32 in the screw fixation group. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score, visual analogue scale (VAS), and patient satisfaction. Radiographic parameters included hallux valgus angle(HVA), intermetatarsal angle(IMA), and distal metatarsal articular angle(DMAA). RESULTS: Both groups showed significant clinical and radiographic improvement (P < 0.01). No significant between-group differences were observed in the other clinical or radiographic outcomes (P > 0.05). Treatment costs were significantly lower in the K-wire group (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: K-wire fixation provides clinical and radiographic outcomes comparable to screw fixation, while avoiding the need for an additional procedure to remove the implant. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Contemporary surgical decision-making for hallux valgus and hallux rigidus in Switzerland: A national cross-sectional survey using standardized clinical scenarios.

BACKGROUND: Surgical management of hallux valgus and hallux rigidus is influenced by deformity severity, surgeon training, and evolving techniques. Previous surveys in Australia (2012), Switzerland (2015), and Israel (2023) using identical hypothetical cases demonstrated marked regional differences and a recent rise in minimally invasive Chevron-Akin (MICA). Whether these advances have altered contemporary Swiss practice remains unclear. METHODS: An electronic survey replicating the original questionnaire was distributed to members of the Swiss Foot and Ankle Society. Three standardized clinical cases were presented: mild hallux valgus, severe hallux valgus, and hallux valgus et rigidus. Respondents selected nonoperative versus operative management and specified procedures and fixation methods. Demographics, subspecialty training, and surgical volume were recorded. Current results were compared with prior Swiss data to assess temporal change. RESULTS: Eighty surgeons completed the survey (94% foot and ankle specialists). For mild hallux valgus, 87.7% recommended surgery; Scarf osteotomy remained most common (49.4%), followed by Chevron (21.0%) and Minimally Invasive Hallux Valgus correction (14.8%). Minimally Invasive adopters were predominantly mid-career (83% aged 41-50), high-volume surgeons. For severe hallux valgus, 95.1% favoured surgery; MTPJ arthrodesis was preferred (50.6% isolated; 11.1% with Lapidus), while Minimally Invasive Hallux Valgus correction was rarely chosen (2.5%). In hallux valgus et rigidus, 96% selected MTPJ fusion, most commonly plate-and-screw fixation (45.1%). Compared with 2015, fixation strategies evolved, yet procedure selection remained largely unchanged. CONCLUSION: Despite global expansion of minimally invasive bunion surgery, Swiss surgeons continue to favour established open techniques, particularly Scarf osteotomy and fusion-based strategies. Adoption of MIS remains limited and concentrated among high-volume, mid-career specialists, indicating a cautious national diffusion pattern. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV, survey study.

Hallux Valgus↗

PubMed2026

Which radiographic plane should be used to quantify the distal tibia angle on weightbearing CT images?

BACKGROUND: Precise quantification of distal tibial alignment is essential for planning corrective osteotomies and ankle joint replacement surgery. The lateral distal tibial angle (LDTA) is the principal radiographic parameter used for this purpose. While LDTA is increasingly measured on weightbearing cone-beam CT (WBCT) using two-dimensional coronal slices, the optimal measurement plane remains unclear. METHODS: In this retrospective comparative study, full-leg WBCT scans of patients scheduled for supramalleolar osteotomy (n = 20; mean age 47 ± 12.8 years) were analyzed. LDTA was measured on three coronal planes of the distal tibial plafond (anterior edge, mid-dome, posterior edge) and compared with semi-automated three-dimensional (3D) tibial alignment measurements as the reference standard. RESULTS: Mid-dome LDTA showed no significant difference from the 3D reference (p > 0.05) and demonstrated excellent agreement. Anterior measurements significantly overestimated LDTA, while posterior measurements underestimated it (both p < 0.05), with only fair agreement. CONCLUSION: LDTA should be measured at the mid-dome of the distal tibial plafond on WBCT to ensure accurate and reproducible alignment assessment. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III - Retrospective Comparative Study.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Wedge tarsectomy using patient specific instrumentation for complex multiplanar foot deformity Reconstruction: A prospective case series.

BACKGROUND: Bony correction in complex cavovarus deformities is often multiplanar. We examine our results following wedge tarsectomy (WT) using patient-specific instrumentation (PSI). METHODS: This single-centre, prospective case series evaluated noncorrectable cavovarus feet undergoing PSI-guided WT. Accuracy of PSI guides/plans, operative duration, and adjunctive procedures were recorded. Weightbearing CT (WBCT) measurements and PROM scores were recorded preoperatively and postoperatively, with 1 year follow-up. Data was then statistically analysed. RESULTS: Eleven patients were included. Planned correction was achieved (two required minor intraoperative adjustments to the initial osteotomy and nine required adjunctive procedures). Mean operative time was 135 min. Postoperative improvements were significant radiologically and in MOxFW walking distance. All fused by 3 months, with no significant complications. CONCLUSION: PSI-guided wedge tarsectomy safely achieves predictable multiplanar corrections. Our unit's experience has been excellent, with improvement in patients' walking, particularly with larger deformity corrections. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, prospective case series.

Humans↗