Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Saquinavir”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMed1999

Resistance mutations to zidovudine and saquinavir in patients receiving zidovudine plus saquinavir or zidovudine and zalcitabine plus saquinavir in AIDS clinical trials group 229.

The relationships among treatment regimens, plasma human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) RNA levels, and resistance mutations to saquinavir (codons 48 and 90) and zidovudine (codon 215) were examined in a cohort of 144 patients from the AIDS Clinical Trials Group 229 study. After 24-40 weeks of therapy, no patients who had received the two-drug combination (zidovudine plus saquinavir) had only codon 48 mutations, 45.8% had only codon 90 mutations, and 8.3% had both codon 48 and 90 mutations. Mutations developed by patients who had received the three-drug combination (zidovudine and zalcitabine plus saquinavir) were codon 48 alone in 1.4%, codon 90 alone in 33.3%, and both codons 48 and 90 in 4.2%. The difference between the groups showed a trend toward reduced mutations with three versus two drugs but did not reach significance (P=.11, two-sided chi2). Higher baseline HIV RNA levels correlated with the development of protease mutations. Mutations at codon 215 were present in 82% of all patients at baseline and in 87% after therapy.

Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome↗
PubMed1999

Quality of life outcomes of saquinavir, zalcitabine and combination saquinavir plus zalcitabine therapy for adults with advanced HIV infection with CD4 counts between 50 and 300 cells/mm3.

BACKGROUND: Benefits in patient health-related quality of life (HRQL) have not yet been demonstrated for combination antiretroviral therapy with protease inhibitors and nucleoside analogues. This double-blind study evaluated zalcitabine or saquinavir monotherapy and combination saquinavir plus zalcitabine therapy on HROL of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected adults. METHODS: 940 HIV-infected patients (CD4 counts 50-300 cells/mm3) who had discontinued zidovudine therapy (for intolerance or treatment failure) were randomized to one of three regimens: zalcitabine 0.75 mg every 8 h; saquinavir 600 mg every 8 h; or combination zalcitabine 0.75 mg plus saquinavir 600 mg every 8 hours. HRQL was measured at baseline, 24 and 48 weeks using the Medical Outcome Study HIV Health Survey (MOS-HIV). The primary endpoints were the physical and mental health summary scores (PHS; MHS) of the MOS-HIV as well as a global visual analogue scale (VAS) score. RESULTS: After 24 weeks, the zalcitabine-treated patients demonstrated significantly greater decreases in PHS scores (-4.4 +/- 0.6; saquinavir: -1.3 +/- 0.6; zalcitabine plus saquinavir: -1.7 +/- 0.6; P < 0.0001) and MHS scores (-2.2 +/- 0.5; saquinavir: -1.0 +/- 0.5; zalcitabine plus saquinavir: -0.5 +/- 0.5; P = 0.032) compared to saquinavir and zalcitabine plus saquinavir treated patients. No differences were observed on the VAS (P = 0.172). Nine of 10 MOS-HIV subscales demonstrated results consistent with the primary endpoints. After 48 weeks, a statistically significant difference between the saquinavir-treated groups and the zalcitabine monotherapy group was observed for PHS scores (zalcitabine: -5.8 +/- 0.6; saquinavir: -4.1 +/- 0.6; zalcitabine plus saquinavir: -3.5 +/- 0.6; P = 0.014). CONCLUSIONS: Saquinavir monotherapy and combination saquinavir plus zalcitabine demonstrated a benefit in HRQL relative to zalcitabine monotherapy in patients with prior zidovudine therapy. The HRQL findings are concordant with improved survival and reduced clinical progression of HIV infection found in this study.

Anti-HIV Agents↗
PubMed1996

Human immunodeficiency virus. Mutations in the viral protease that confer resistance to saquinavir increase the dissociation rate constant of the protease-saquinavir complex.

Mutations in the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) protease (L90M, G48V, and L90M/G48V) arise when HIV is passaged in the presence of the HIV protease inhibitor saquinavir. These mutations yield a virus with less sensitivity to the drug (L90M > G48V >> L90M/G48V). L90M, G48V, and L90M/G48V proteases have 1/20, 1/160, and 1/1000 the affinity for saquinavir compared to WT protease, respectively. Therefore, the affinity of mutant protease for saquinavir decreased as the sensitivity of the virus to saquinavir decreased. Association rate constants for WT and mutant proteases with saquinavir were similar, ranging from 2 to 4 x 10(7) M-1 s-1. In contrast, the dissociation rate constants for WT, L90M, G48V, and L90M/G48V proteases complexed with saquinavir were 0.0014, 0.019, 0.128, and 0. 54 s-1, respectively. This indicated that the reduced affinity for mutant proteases and saquinavir is primarily the result of larger dissociation rate constants. The increased dissociation rate constants may be the result of a decrease in the internal equilibrium between the bound inhibitor with the protease flaps up and the bound inhibitor with the flaps down. Interestingly, the affinity of these mutant proteases for VX-478, ABT-538, AG-1343, or L-735,524 was not reduced as much as that for saquinavir. Finally, the catalytic constants of WT and mutant proteases were determined for eight small peptide substrates that mimic the viral cleavage sites in vivo. WT and L90M proteases had similar catalytic constants for these substrates. In contrast, G48V and L90M/G48V proteases had catalytic efficiency (kcat/Km) values with TLNF-PISP, RKIL-FLDG, and AETF-YVDG that were 1/10 to 1/20 the value of WT protease. The decreased catalytic efficiencies were primarily the result of increased Km values. Thus, mutations in the protease decrease the affinity of the enzyme for saquinavir and the catalytic efficiency with peptide substrates.

Antiviral Agents↗
PubMed2005

Saquinavir 500 mg film-coated tablets demonstrate bioequivalence to saquinavir 200 mg hard capsules when boosted with twice-daily ritonavir in healthy volunteers.

OBJECTIVE: To establish the bioequivalence of a 500 mg film-coated tablet of saquinavir mesylate (FCT SQV) to the 200 mg hard-capsule saquinavir mesylate (HC SQV), both boosted with ritonavir and administered under fed conditions. METHODS: We carried out a multi-centre, open-label, randomized, two-sequence, four-period, two-treatment, replicated crossover study in 93 healthy men and 7 healthy women. Individuals were randomly assigned to receive sequential single doses of saquinavir in one of two treatment sequences: ABAB or BABA. Individuals received 100 mg ritonavir twice daily for 24 days. On days 14,17, 20 and 23, study participants took 1000 mg of HC SQV (five 200 mg capsules, treatment A) or FCT SQV (two 500 mg tablets, treatment B) with a high-fat, high-calorie breakfast, and pharmacokinetic analyses were carried out over the next 24 hours. Area under the saquinavir concentration-time curve (AUC0-alpha), maximum saquinavir plasma concentration (Cmax), time to Cmax and terminal half-life were calculated. The relative bioavailability of FCT SOV versus HC SQV was calculated as the ratio of the respective estimated mean saquinavir AUC0-alpha and Cmax. The calculation was based on an ANOVA including the factors site, sex, sequence, period, treatment and study participant to the log-transformed parameters log(AUC0-alpha) and log(Cmax); the relative bioavailability and the 90% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using the treatment contrasts of the ANOVA. Bioequivalence was concluded as for both parameters, AUC0-alpha and Cmax, the 90% CIs for the relative bioavailability were entirely included in the reference region [0.80-1.25]. RESULTS: Saquinavir plasma concentration-time profiles for the two formulations were similar. Geometric mean AUC0-alpha and Cmax values were clearly increased for FCT SQV (26 826 versus 24 430 h*ng/ml; and 3644 versus 3064 ng/ml, respectively); ratios of mean exposures were estimated to be 1.10 for AUC0-alpha and 1.19 for Cmax of saquinavir. However, the corresponding two-sided 90% CIs (1.04-1.16 and 1.14-1.25, respectively) all fell within the limits set for equivalence (0.80, 1.25). The adverse event profile for FCT SQV was similar to that for HC SQV. CONCLUSION: The new 500 mg FCT SQV formulation is bioequivalent to the 200 mg HC SQV formulation, at the dose of 1000 mg, in combination with 100 mg ritonavir under fed conditions. The 500 mg FCT SQV formulation reduces pill count for boosted saquinavir (SQV/r) from six capsules to three tablets twice daily. This may increase patient acceptability of SQV/r, particularly in less treatment-experienced patients.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Saquinavir and ritonavir pharmacokinetics following combined ritonavir and saquinavir (soft gelatin capsules) administration.

AIMS: To investigate the influence of combined ritonavir (RTV) and saquinavir (soft-gelatin capsule formulation; SQV) on systemic exposure to SQV with a view to optimizing the dosing regimen of combined RTV and SQV antiretroviral therapy. METHODS: In this open labelled, randomized, parallel group study, SQV and RTV were administered twice daily for 14 days to groups of eight healthy subjects. The two antiretrovirals were either administered alone (800 mg SQV, regimen A, and 400 mg RTV, B) or in combination at various dose levels (RTV : SQV: 400 : 400 mg, C; 300 : 600 mg, D; 200 : 800 mg, E; 300 : 800 mg, F; 400 : 800 mg, G; and 400 : 600 mg, H). Pharmacokinetic parameters of saquinavir and ritonavir were determined and adverse events, vital signs, and clinical laboratory variables recorded. RESULTS: RTV substantially increased the plasma concentration of saquinavir for all dose combinations, compared with SQV alone. Based on the primary statistical analysis there was an overall 17-, 22-, and 23-fold increase in saquinavir AUC(0,24 h) on day 14 with regimens E, F, and G, respectively (with confidence intervals of 10-30, 13-37, and 13-39). The lowest combination dose of RTV (200 : 800 mg; E) significantly increased the saquinavir AUC(0,24 h) from below 5 to 57 microg ml(-1) h, which was higher than the exposure obtained with the 400 : 400 mg twice daily regimen (i.e. 36 microg ml(-1) h). RTV also reduced intersubject variability in AUC(0,24 h) for saquinavir from 105% to 32-68%, and C(max)(0,24 h) from 124% to 30-49%. In contrast, SQV showed no clinically significant effect on the pharmacokinetics of ritonavir. The combination regimens were well tolerated, with the least number of adverse events recorded for the 200 : 800 mg (RTV : SQV) combination regimen. CONCLUSIONS: RTV significantly increases saquinavir exposure as a consequence of inhibiting SQV metabolism and possibly P-glycoprotein efflux. Pharmacokinetic and safety profiles obtained in the current study indicate that the use of a combination with a lower dose of RTV and a higher dose of SQV than the 400 : 400 mg combination frequently used in clinical practice should be further explored.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2000

Decreased exposure to saquinavir in HIV-1-infected patients after long-term antiretroviral therapy including ritonavir and saquinavir.

OBJECTIVE: To explore whether steady-state plasma pharmacokinetics of ritonavir and saquinavir change during long-term treatment in HIV-1-infected patients on antiretroviral treatment including ritonavir and saquinavir. METHODS: The pharmacokinetics of ritonavir and saquinavir were assessed during an 8-h period on two occasions in six HIV-1 infected patients on stable twice daily treatment with ritonavir 400 mg, saquinavir 400 mg and stavudine 40 mg with or without lamivudine 150 mg twice daily. RESULTS: The first study day was 4-12 months (median 7 months) after the start of the current regimen. The second study day was 9-15 months (median 10 months) later. No significant differences were observed for the ritonavir pharmacokinetics between the first and second study day. However, median change in plasma trough level of saquinavir between the two study days was -30% (range -79 to +11%; P = 0.06). Median change in maximum plasma concentration was -40% (range -62 to +34%; P = 0.09). The median change in area under the plasma concentration versus time curve over 0-8 h was -33% (range -53 to +21%; P = 0.06). CONCLUSION: The exposure to saquinavir decreased over time in HIV-infected patients on stable antiretroviral therapy. These data suggest that regular monitoring of plasma drug concentrations should become part of routine patient care even in apparently compliant patients.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

The rabbit study: ritonavir and saquinavir in combination in saquinavir-experienced and previously untreated patients.

Thirteen protease inhibitor-naive patients with HIV-1 infection, and 12 patients with a median of 58 months prior treatment with saquinavir (SQV) monotherapy, were treated with SQV (400 mg twice daily) and ritonavir (RIT, 500 mg twice daily) in a study designed to assess the effect of prior treatment with SQV monotherapy on the antiretroviral activity of RIT-SQV combination therapy. Median baseline viral load and CD4+ cell counts were 155,000 and 262,000 copies/ml and 333 and 225 cells/mm3 in the naive and experienced groups, respectively. Mean viral load changes at 24 weeks were -1.63 and -0.27 log copies/ml in the naive and SQV-experienced groups, respectively (intent-to-treat analysis). Baseline genotype by point mutation assay and sequencing in the SQV-experienced group was highly predictive of virological response. Eight of 11 SQV-experienced patients had evidence of phenotypic resistance to RIT at baseline, despite previous treatment with SQV only. There was strong correlation between phenotypic resistance to RIT and the presence of the L90M mutation. We conclude that prolonged prior treatment with saquinavir monotherapy may produce cross-resistance to ritonavir and reduce the subsequent response to ritonavir-saquinavir in combination. In this study, both phenotypic resistance to ritonavir and presence of the L90M mutation predicted the viral load response to ritonavir-saquinavir.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Quality of life outcomes of combination zalcitabine-zidovudine, saquinavir-zidovudine, and saquinavir-zalcitabine-zidovudine therapy for HIV-infected adults with CD4 cell counts between 50 and 350 per cubic millimeter. PISCES (SV14604) Study Group.

BACKGROUND: This double-blind study evaluated treatment with zalcitabine-zidovudine, saquinavir-zidovudine, or saquinavir-zalcitabine-zidovudine on the health-related quality of life of HIV-infected adults with CD4 cell counts between 50 and 350 cells/mm3. METHODS: Nine hundred and ninety-three HIV-infected male or female quality of life substudy patients aged 18 years or older, with CD4 cell counts between 50 and 350 cells/mm3 naïve to antiretroviral therapy or with less than 16 weeks of zidovudine therapy, were randomly assigned to one of three daily regimens: zalcitabine 0.75 mg and zidovudine 200 mg every 8 h (ddC/ZDV); saquinavir 600 mg and zidovudine 200 mg every 8 h (SQV/ZDV); or saquinavir 600 mg, zalcitabine 0.75 mg and zidovudine 200 mg every 8 h (SQV/ddC/ZDV). The health-related quality of life was measured using the Medical Outcome Study HIV (MOS-HIV) Health Survey subscale and physical and mental health summary scores, and a global visual analogue scale (VAS) score. The primary health-related quality of life endpoints were the MOS-HIV physical and mental health summary scores. RESULTS: After 24 weeks of treatment, no statistically significant differences were observed between the three treatment groups on physical health and mental health summary scores (global test P = 0.118). After 48 weeks of treatment, statistically significant differences among the groups were observed for physical health and mental health summary scores (global test P = 0.020); no change in physical health summary scores from the baseline were seen in the triple combination therapy, whereas the ddC/ZDV combination therapy group showed decreases from baseline in physical health summary scores (P = 0.008). Six of the 10 individual MOS-HIV subscale scores and the VAS scores showed results consistent with the physical health summary endpoints after 48 weeks of therapy. No statistically significant differences in baseline to 48 week changes in MOS-HIV subscale or summary scores were seen between the ddC/ZDV and SQV/ZDV groups (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Patients on triple combination therapy maintained their quality of life over 48 weeks compared with significant decreases in the quality of life for ddC/ZDV combination therapy.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Randomized salvage therapy with saquinavir-ritonavir versus saquinavir-nelfinavir for highly protease inhibitor-experienced HIV-infected patients.

PURPOSE: To compare saquinavir + ritonavir and saquinavir + nelfinavir with nucleoside recycling in patients with multiple failures of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART). METHOD: This was a prospective, multicenter, randomized open trial. Inclusion criteria were the following: consent, age > 18, previous protease inhibitor (PI) exposure > 6 months, unchanged HAART > 3 months, and viral load > 3 log. The treatments compared were ritonavir 200 mg bid + saquinavir 600 mg bid (Rito-Saq), and nelfinavir 1,000 mg bid + saquinavir 600 mg bid (Nelf-Saq). Nucleoside analogues were recycled, and nonnucleoside inhibitors were not permitted. Trough levels of the three drugs were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography at the month 3 visit. After the study had been completed, genotyping analysis was done on the first serum at entry. RESULTS: The study was interrupted due to the availability of new anti-HIV drugs. A random sample of 31 (16 Rito-Saq and 15 Nelf-Saq) patients was divided into two groups, which were comparable in terms of demographic data and previous history of HIV infection. Mean CD4 cell count and plasma viral load (pVL) were 316 +/- 169 and 3.89 +/- 0.87 for Rito-Saq and 448 +/- 238 and 3.85 +/- 0.32 for Nelf-Saq. Previous duration of PI exposure was 31 months for both groups. The mean number of protease gene mutations was 3.8 (range, 2-7) and 4.4 (range, 2-9), respectively. On intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis at month 6, pVL stabilization or decrease >/= 0.5 log was observed in 18 patients (58%): 10 for Rito-Saq and 8 for Nelf-Saq. In a multivariate logistic regression analysis, virological success at month 3 was inversely correlated to baseline viral load (R = 0.14; 95% CI 0.03-2.9; p =.01); and at month 6, virological success was inversely associated to the number of mutations in the protease gene (R = 2.2; 95% CI 0.73-6.53; p =.06). CONCLUSION: Nelf-Saq and Rito-Saq combinations can be proposed in case of multiple HAART failures. The fact that the virological response was inversely correlated to baseline viral load makes the case for an early switch after a HAART failure.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Baseline human immunodeficiency virus type 1 phenotype, genotype, and RNA response after switching from long-term hard-capsule saquinavir to indinavir or soft-gel-capsule saquinavir in AIDS clinical trials group protocol 333.

AIDS Clinical Trials Group protocol 333 was an open-label trial of a switch from saquinavir (SQV) hard capsules (SQVhc) to indinavir (IDV) or saquinavir soft-gel capsules (SQVsgc) after >48 weeks of prior treatment with SQVhc. Eighty-nine subjects received IDV or SQVsgc or continued to receive SQVhc and continued unchanged treatment with non-protease-inhibitor antivirals for 8 weeks. Subjects receiving SQVhc then switched treatment to IDV. Baseline drug susceptibility and protease gene sequencing were done; 12 codons related to IDV and SQV resistance were analyzed. After 112 weeks (median) of SQVhc, the fall in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) type 1 RNA level from baseline was significantly greater with IDV and was inversely correlated with the number of protease substitutions. The number of substitutions also correlated with baseline CD4 cell count, HIV-1 RNA level, SQV experience, and drug susceptibility. Substitution at codon 10, which occurred only in isolates with >/=2 substitutions, was associated with blunted RNA response. IDV IC(50) correlated with HIV-1 RNA response after the switch to IDV but added little predictive power once the genotype was considered.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2003

Pharmacokinetic and tolerability profile of twice-daily saquinavir hard gelatin capsules and saquinavir soft gelatin capsules boosted with ritonavir in healthy volunteers.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the pharmacokinetics and safety of a boosted saquinavir (SQV)/ritonavir (RTV) combination, administered as either the hard gelatin capsule (HGC) or soft gelatin capsule (SGC) formulation of SQV, in 24 healthy volunteers. METHODS: This was a single-centre, open-label, randomized, 2 x 2 crossover study. Twelve subjects were randomized to receive SQV/RTV 1000 mg/100 mg twice daily (BID) orally for 10 days, as either the HGC or SGC formulation. The pharmacokinetic profile of SQV was determined on day 10. Subjects then crossed over to the opposite SQV formulation, and the pharmacokinetic profile was determined again on day 20. The primary analysis was the assessment of bioequivalence based on logarithmically transformed values for AUC(0-24 h) and Cmax for the two formulations. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant increase in the geometric means of all the pharmacokinetic variables evaluated for SQV-HGC/RTV compared with SQV-SGC/RTV. A mean AUC0-24 h-value of 15.798 micro g/mL/h was reported for the HGC formulation compared with 11.655 micro g/mL/h for the SGC formulation (P = 0.0043). The SQV-HGC/RTV combination was better tolerated in terms of gastrointestinal system disorders. Furthermore, no elevations in triglycerides or total cholesterol were reported with SQV/RTV during the entire study period. CONCLUSION: In healthy volunteers, RTV boosting of SQV-HGC produces plasma exposures at least comparable to SQV-SGC, which is accompanied by an improvement in gastrointestinal system disorders.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Comparison of ritonavir plus saquinavir- and nelfinavir plus saquinavir-containing regimens as salvage therapy in children with human immunodeficiency type 1 infection.

BACKGROUND: In this retrospective study we compared the antiretroviral effect of regimens consisting of simultaneous administration of two protease inhibitors (PI) with at least one nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor on plasma viral load (VL) and CD4 cell count in HIV-infected children intensively pretreated with nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors and PIs. METHODS: Eleven HIV-infected children were changed to antiretroviral combination regimens including two PIs and followed for a median time of 24 weeks. Group A comprised six patients who were given ritonavir + saquinavir (SQV) and Group B consists of five patients who were changed to nelfinavir + SQV. Patients were treated with these combinations with 2 PIs because of treatment failure (increasing viral load) of prior PI therapy or clinical signs of disease progression. OUTCOME MEASURES: Serial determinations of plasma viral load (Amplicor, Roche) and CD4 cells were performed every 4 to 8 weeks. The detection limit of the Amplicor-reverse transcriptase-PCR assay was 50 copies/ml (1.7 log10). RESULTS: In Group A the median VL reduction was 1.1 log10 after 3 months and 1.4 log10 after 6 months. In Group B median VL decreased 0.1 and 0.2 log10 after 3 and 6 months. In both groups during the study period none of the patients reached undetectable VL. The relative changes of CD4 cells above baseline in Group A showed a median increase of 7% after 3 months and 23% after 6 months. In Group B after 3 months CD4 cells did not increase, and after 6 months the median relative increase was only 7%. Both combination therapies were well tolerated, not necessitating any drug interruption during study period. CONCLUSIONS: In children with intensive prior antiretroviral treatment, a salvage therapy including two PIs demonstrated antiretroviral efficacy in some patients. In this study the reduction of the VL as well as the increase of CD4 cells was more pronounced with ritonavir + SQV than with nelfinavir + SQV. With both combinations complete suppression of HIV replication was not achieved. Therefore the long term effect of these combinations may be limited by the emergence of resistant HIV strains.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2003

Pharmacokinetics of once-daily saquinavir hard-gelatin capsules and saquinavir soft-gelatin capsules boosted with ritonavir in HIV-1-infected subjects.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the pharmacokinetics of once-daily saquinavir (SQV) hard-gelatin capsule (HGC)/ritonavir (RTV), 1600/100 mg, compared with once-daily SQV soft-gelatin capsule (SGC)/RTV, 1600/100 mg. METHODS: We evaluated 13 randomly selected HIV-1-infected subjects taking once-daily SQV SGC/RTV, 1600/100 mg, plus dual nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) in this pharmacokinetic (PK) substudy. Subjects took 1 week of SQV HGC/RTV and NRTIs, followed by steady-state SQV PK determinations. Subjects then changed to SQV SGC/RTV and NRTIs for 1 week, followed again by steady-state SQV PK determinations. Area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC), maximum concentration (C(max)), minimum concentration (C(min)), time to C(max), and elimination half-life were calculated. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in AUC values between HGCs and SGCs, with a median (plus interquartile range [IQR]) of 50.0 (42.6-71.5) versus 35.5 (28.0-50.2) mg/L/h, respectively ( =.056). Intersubject variability resulted in 4 of 13 subjects on the SQV SGCs and 2 of 13 subjects on the SQV HGCs having a C(min) below the minimum effective concentration of 0.05 mg/L. CONCLUSION: Once-daily SQV HGCs, 1600 mg, boosted with once-daily RTV, 100 mg, resulted in PK parameters that were similar to those observed with 1600 mg of SQV SGC/100 mg RTV once daily. Once-daily SQV HGC/RTV, 1600/100 mg, may be easier to use in developing countries and may increase access where drug costs can be less, the capsule size is smaller, and the need for refrigeration is lessened.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMed2000

Therapeutic drug monitoring of saquinavir in patients during protease inhibitor therapy with saquinavir alone or in combination with ritonavir or nelfinavir.

Therapeutic drug monitoring is essential in HIV-patients undergoing highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART). Saquinavir (SQV) is used alone or in combination with ritonavir (RTV) or nelfinavir (NLF), respectively, in the context of the HAART drug regimen. The achievable SQV concentration range in clinical practice remains to be elucidated. A non-randomized prospecitve clinical trial 19 patients (group I) receiving SQV (1x600 mg/d Invirase or Fortovase), 29 patients (group II) receiving SQV (2x600 mg/d Fortovase) plus RTV (2x400 mg/d Norvir), and 21 patients (group III) receiving SQV (2x600 mg/d Fortovase) plus NLF (2x750 mg/d Viracept) was conducted to determine SQV plasma concentrations. SQV levels were determined as trough levels during routine outpatient visits. Analysis was performed by HPLC with UV detection. The lowest SQV plasma levels were found in group I (95% CI 89-177 ng/ml). Significantly higher SQV levels were found in group III (combination with NLF) ranging from 242 to 398 ng/ml (95% CI) and in group II (combination with RTV) ranging from 1354 to 1747 ng/ml (95% CI). The IC 50% of 54 ng/ml was not reached in at least one sample during the study (mean duration of study 16+/-10 months) in 14/19 patients of group I, 9/29 patients in group II and 13/21 patients in group III, respectively. A positive correlation between patient compliance, defined by SQV levels in the 95% CI of the used combination, and the HIV RNA plasma level was found. The presented data confirm that therapy with SQV alone may not be effective, since trough levels are near the lower limit of antiretroviral efficacy. Although the combination of SQV with NLF results in higher SQV plasma concentrations in a bid regimen, in more than 60% of the patients SQV concentrations below IC 50 level were detected during the twelve-months study period. The combination of SQV with RTV yields the highest SQV-trough levels. SQV concentrations below the IC 50 were seen in only 31% of patients with the SQV/RTV combination. In conclusion, therapeutic drug monitoring allows an efficient surveillance of patients compliance. In addition, therapeutic drug monitoring represents a valuable tool for management of HAART in patients receiving a complex comedication or suffering from advanced liver disease.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Long-term efficacy and safety of twice-daily saquinavir soft gelatin capsules (SGC), with or without nelfinavir, and three times daily saquinavir-SGC, in triple combination therapy for HIV infection: 100-week follow-up.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of saquinavir soft gelatin capsules (SQV-SGC) (Fortovase) in twice-daily, with or without nelfinavir (NFV), and three-times-daily regimens. This was an extension of a 48-week study, with follow-up to 100 weeks. DESIGN: Patients were randomized to one of three treatment arms: arm A, SQV-SGC 1200 mg three times daily plus two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs); arm B, SQV-SGC 1,600 mg twice daily plus two NRTIs; or arm C, SQV-SGC 1200 mg twice daily plus NFV 1250 mg twice daily plus one NRTI. At week 48, patients could either withdraw or continue in the study to the common study closure date. Antiretroviral activity was assessed by changes in HIV-1 RNA values and CD4 cell counts from 48 weeks until 100 weeks. RESULTS: In the modified intention-to-treat population, the proportion of patients with HIV-1 RNA values <400 copies/ml was statistically different between arms A and C (49 vs 28%, P=0.017), and arms B and C (48 vs 28%, P=0.027). Continued suppression of HIV-1 replication (HIV-1 RNA <400 copies/ml) was observed through 100 weeks in 83% (30/36), 73% (29/40) and 62% (16/26) of patients in treatment arms A, B and C, respectively, in the on-treatment (OT) population. At 100 weeks, sustained increases were achieved in mean CD4 cell counts of +361, +273 and +309 cells/mm3, respectively (OT population). No additional adverse events or increase in the proportion of patients reporting adverse events were observed from 48 weeks to 100 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the long-term efficacy and safety of SQV-SGC twice daily, with or without NFV, and three times daily, in triple combination therapy for HIV-1-infected patients. However, the evidence suggests that long-term treatment with SQV-SGC plus NFV may be less acceptable to patients.

Anti-HIV Agents↗
PubMed1998

Saquinavir-soft gel: establishing saquinavir in HAART regimens.

The initial formulation of the HIV protease inhibitor (PI) saquinavir (SQV) in hard gel capsules (Invirase) demonstrated significant clinical benefit in double and triple combination regimens in comparative studies. However, pharmacological limitations of this preparation resulted in fewer patients achieving optimal treatment responses than observed with other PIs. Changes in formulation and dosing to a new soft gelatin capsule formulation of SQV (SQV-SGC, Fortovase result in an average 8-fold increase in SQV exposure with SQV-SGC. Data from clinical trials indicate that this enhanced plasma exposure translates into more potent antiviral activity, with small comparative studies suggesting activity to be similar to other available PIs in triple therapy highly-active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) regimens. Additionally, SQV-SGC appears to be an excellent candidate for PI combination use. SQV-SGC appears well-tolerated with a low incidence of mainly gastrointestinal side-effects. The lower affinity to P450 isozymes of SQV means that the incidence of drug interactions is low, indeed probably lower than with other approved members of this class. Current obstacles to SQV-SGC's widespread use include only limited, short-term bid dosing data (outside of combination with ritonavir) and the pill burden of 18 capsules per day.

Journal Article↗