Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “Salvage Therapy”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources

Salvage therapy.

Salvage therapy is an approach taken when previous anti-HIV treatments fail to achieve desired goals, which include undetectable viral load, CD4 cell levels above 200 cells/mm3, and the prevention of HIV disease progression. It is one of the most difficult situations to face as a patient, and one of the most problematic challenges for health-care providers. Though sometimes euphemistically referred to as "management of treatment-experienced patients," many HIV positive people, having already exhausted the benefits of at least a couple of drug combinations, think of their next regimen as salvage or "rescue" therapy. A few physicians argue that due to cross-resistance among different drugs within the same class, people with HIV infection have only one good shot at treating it, and that any treatment regimen beyond the first is therefore salvage therapy. Others see salvage therapy as literally the end of the line--when an individual's HIV has developed extensive resistance to all currently available treatments. But most providers consider salvage therapy to be somewhere in between these extremes. Understanding that the term can refer to different treatment situations is important. Nevertheless, most of the information in this article will be relevant for anyone changing a drug regimen, no matter where that person is on the treatment path.

Anti-HIV Agents↗

Combined prostate brachytherapy and short-term androgen deprivation therapy as salvage therapy for locally recurrent prostate cancer after external beam irradiation.

PURPOSE: We describe the treatment outcome in 17 patients who received combined salvage brachytherapy and short-term androgen deprivation therapy for local prostate cancer relapse after prior external beam irradiation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Median patient age was 68 years. Local relapse after external beam irradiation was confirmed by biopsy. Median prostate specific antigen at local relapse was 4.7 ng/ml. Five of the 17 patients were enrolled in a protocol combining androgen deprivation therapy with brachytherapy and the remaining men were treated off protocol. All patients received neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy for a median of 3 months, followed by ultrasound guided brachytherapy using 125I in 9 and 103Pd seeds in 8. Five patients also received adjuvant leuprolide for a median of 6 months. Biochemical failure was defined using the American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology definition. Toxicity was graded with a modified Radiation Therapy Oncology Group scale. RESULTS: Median followup was 44 months. The actuarial 4-year biochemical control rate was 75%. Three patients died of intercurrent diseases. No prostate cancer mortality or local failure had occurred at last followup. One patient had bone metastasis. No clinical or treatment factor was associated with biochemical control. Grade 3 and 4 genitourinary toxicity developed in 7 (41%) and 1 patients (6%), respectively. Grade 2 and 3 gastrointestinal toxicity occurred in 5 (29%) and 1 patients (6%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Our series suggests that salvage brachytherapy and short-term androgen deprivation therapy can achieve biochemical control in select patients with local relapse after prior external beam irradiation. The major side effects are urinary complications, including grade 3 and 4 complications in 41% and 6% of cases, respectively.

Aged↗

Similar response rates and superior early progression-free survival with gemcitabine, dexamethasone, and cisplatin salvage therapy compared with carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine, and melphalan salvage therapy prior to autologous stem cell transplantation for recurrent or refractory Hodgkin lymphoma.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to compare the response rates, ability to mobilize autologous hematopoietic (peripheral blood) stem cells (PBSCs), and progression-free survival (PFS) after second-line chemotherapy with either gemcitabine, dexamethasone, and cisplatin (GDP) or carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine, and melphalan (mini-BEAM) followed by high-dose therapy and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (ASCT) for patients with recurrent or refractory Hodgkin lymphoma. METHODS: The outcomes of 68 consecutive patients who were referred for salvage therapy (34 patients received mini-BEAM, and 34 patients received GDP) were compared retrospectively. Patients received mini-BEAM as inpatient treatment every 3-4 weeks, whereas GDP was administered on an outpatient basis every 3 weeks. Responding patients proceeded to stem cell mobilization, followed by high dose etoposide and melphalan, and ASCT. Patients who had disease bulk at recurrence that measured > 5 cm received involved-field radiation post-ASCT. RESULTS: The response rate to GDP prior to ASCT (complete responses, unconfirmed complete responses, and partial responses) was 62% (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 45-78%) compared with 68% (95% CI, 52-83%) for mini-BEAM (P = 0.61). After mobilizing chemotherapy, the proportion of patients for whom the target PBSC number of > or = 5 x 10(6) CD34-positive cells/kg was obtained was 97% after GDP and 57% after MB (P = 0.0003). More patients completed collection with a single apheresis procedure after GDP than after mini-BEAM (73% vs. 36%; P = 0.004), and fewer patients in the GDP group required bone marrow harvesting to proceed to ASCT. After a median follow-up of 1.8 years after ASCT, PFS was significantly better for patients who received GDP compared with patients who received mini-BEAM (74% vs. 35% at 1.5 yrs, respectively; P = 0.005). Overall survival at 1.5 years was 91% after GDP and 82% after mini-BEAM (P = 0.23). CONCLUSIONS: Although this was a retrospective analysis, response to GDP and early PFS after ASCT compared favorably with mini-BEAM salvage chemotherapy. Based on these data, the authors believe that a Phase III trial comparing GDP with mini-BEAM or other platinum-containing regimens is warranted.

Adult↗

Colloidal bismuth subcitrate-based twice-a-day quadruple therapy as primary or salvage therapy for Helicobacter pylori infection.

OBJECTIVE: Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) eradication rates in northern Sardinia using standard 1-wk triple therapies (i.e., a proton pump inhibitor and two antibiotics) are typically <60%, primarily because of antibiotic resistance. The aim of this study was to test b.i.d. quadruple therapy as primary and as salvage therapy in this population. METHODS: This was a prospective, single center study of consecutive dyspeptic H. pylori-infected patients. Therapy consisted of omeprazole 20 mg, tetracycline 500 mg, metronidazole 500 mg, and bismuth subcitrate caplets 240 mg, all b.i.d. with the midday and evening meals for 14 days. H. pylori status was evaluated by 13C-urea breath test and histology before and 4-6 wk after therapy. Eradication was defined as no positive test. RESULTS: We enrolled 118 consecutive dyspeptic patients (mean age 46 yr; 73 men, including 15 with peptic ulcer disease). Of the patients, 42 (38%) had failed prior therapy: twice in 21 cases, three times in 12, and four or more times in nine. The intention-to-treat cure rate was 95% (110 of 116) (95% CI = 90-98%) overall, and 98% per protocol, irrespective of diagnosis, age, prior treatment failure, or smoking status. Moderate or severe side effects were experienced by only 5% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Bismuth subcitrate-based b.i.d. quadruple therapy was an excellent primary and salvage therapy and should be considered as first line therapy.

Adult↗

Salvage therapies after failure of Helicobacter pylori eradication with ranitidine bismuth citrate-based therapies.

BACKGROUND: Salvage therapies after initial Helicobacter pylori eradication failure of ranitidine bismuth citrate (RBC)-based regimens remain undefined. AIM: To test the efficacy of 1-week omeprazole, amoxycillin and clarithromycin as a second-line treatment and 1-week quadruple therapy after repeated failures of RBC- and proton pump inhibitor-based regimens. METHOD: Patients were recruited from a recently published prospective randomized study if confirmed to have failed H. pylori eradication with RBC-based regimens. They were given omeprazole 20 mg, amoxycillin 1 g and clarithromycin 500 mg (OAC) b.d. for 1 week. 13C-urea breath test was performed 4 weeks after the conclusion of medication. Those who failed to respond to OAC were given 1-week quadruple therapy (bismuth subcitrate 120 mg, tetracycline 500 mg and metronidazole 400 mg q.d.s. plus omeprazole 20 mg b.d.). RESULTS: Among 398 patients receiving RBC-based therapies, 40 (10%) had failed eradication (RAC=7, RC-2=12, RMC=7, and RMT=14). OAC was prescribed to 31 patients (RAC=4, RC-2=9, RMC=6, and RMT=12) and 68% had successful eradication. Nine out of 10 patients with failed second treatment received quadruple therapy; successful eradication occurred in 83% (5 out of 6) after repeated failures of clarithromycin-based regimens. CONCLUSION: One-week OAC is not an optimal second-line therapy when RBC-clarithromycin combinations fail. Quadruple therapy appears to be effective despite repeated failures of clarithromycin-based RBC or proton pump inhibitor therapies.

Amoxicillin↗

Failure of double protease inhibitor therapy as a salvage therapy for HIV-infected patients resistant to conventional triple therapy.

A therapeutic dilemma arises once HIV-infected patients develop a break-through of HIV-replication under potent antiretroviral therapy. Therefore, we studied whether patients (n = 12) who failed double nucleoside reverse transcriptase (NRTI) plus indinavir or ritonavir triple therapy can be rescued when therapy is switched to double protease inhibitor (PI) treatment (nelfinavir and hard gel saquinavir) and stavudine. With the rescue regimen HIV-RNA levels initially dropped from 148,571 +/- 45,258 copies/ml to 9,310 +/- 6, 965 copies/ml at week 4 (p = 0.0117). However, virus load subsequently increased to almost baseline levels (131,230 +/- 37,743 copies/ml) at week 12. Likewise, CD4-cell counts could only be stabilized initially (baseline 267 +/- 51; week 4 296 +/- 65 cells/microl), but gradually declined thereafter (216 +/- 34 cells/microl week 12). Before therapy was switched, the viral protease gene from 5 analyzed patients showed 3-5 amino acid substitutions. Moreover, 4 of these patients had one amino acid substitution associated with resistance to nelfinavir. Our data suggest that HIV-infected patients resistant to indinavir or ritonavir and double NRTI combination therapy respond to double PI nelfinavir/saquinavir and D4T rescue therapy only initially but have no sustained benefit.

Anti-HIV Agents↗

Early salvage therapy for germ cell cancer using high dose chemotherapy with autologous bone marrow support.

BACKGROUND: Patients with relapsed germ cell cancer (GCT) have a poor prognosis when treated solely with conventional chemotherapy; high dose chemotherapy with autologous bone marrow rescue (ABMR) has shown curative potential in patients with relapsed and refractory GCT. This protocol was designed to incorporate high dose therapy with initial salvage therapy. METHODS: Twenty-three patients in the first relapse of GCT received two cycles of conventional dose cisplatin-based therapy (either vinblastine, ifosfamide and cisplatin [VeIP] or cisplatin, vinblastine, and bleomycin) followed by carboplatin (1500-2100 mg/m2) and etoposide (1200-2250 mg/m2) given in divided doses with ABMR. RESULTS: Eighteen of 23 patients completed protocol therapy including high dose therapy. Five of 23 did not undergo high dose therapy due to: insurance refusal (1); patient refusal (1); active infection (1); central nervous system metastasis (1); death on induction therapy (1). Response to two courses of conventional dose induction therapy (N = 23) was complete response (CR), 8; partial response (PR), 12; stable disease (SD), 2; and toxic death, 1. Two of five individuals who did not continue with high dose therapy are alive and progression free after conventional salvage therapy and surgery with at least 24 months of follow-up. Outcome after high dose therapy (N = 18) was CR, 9, PR, 6, SD, 1, and PD, 2. Two patients who were in PR after receiving two cycles of conventional dose therapy were converted to CR using high dose therapy. There was only one treatment-related death in this cohort, a septic death during VeIP induction therapy. There were no transplant related deaths. Of those patients completing high dose therapy, 7 of 18 (39%) survived, progression free with a median follow-up of 26 months, 2 of 18 are alive with active disease, and 9 of 18 died of recurrent disease. CONCLUSIONS: Conventional dose induction therapy followed by consolidation with high dose therapy and ABMR is well tolerated and provides prolonged disease-free survival in some patients with chemosensitive relapsed germ cell cancer.

Adolescent↗

Outcome of patients with acute myelogenous leukemia after second salvage therapy.

BACKGROUND: Although the prognosis is poor for patients with acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) who have disease recurrence after frontline therapy, this is a general reflection of first salvage therapies. The outcome of patients undergoing second salvage therapy in relation to complete response (CR) rates and survival has not been documented. The authors analyzed the outcome of patients with AML undergoing second salvage therapy, and identified prognostic factors associated with response and survival. METHODS: The records of 594 patients with AML undergoing second salvage therapy from 1980 until 2004 were reviewed. The patient median age was 50 years. Salvage therapy included allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT) in 74 patients, standard-dose cytosine arabinoside (ara-C) combinations in 30 patients, high-dose ara-C combinations in 171 patients, non-ara-C combinations in 73 patients, and Phase I-II single agents in 246 patients. RESULTS: Overall, 76 patients (13%) achieved CR. The median CR duration was 7 months. The median survival was 1.5 months, and the 1-year survival rate was 8%. A multivariate analysis of prognostic factors for CR identified the following 6 independent adverse factors: first CR duration < 6 months; second CR duration < 6 months; salvage therapy not including allogeneic SCT; non-inversion 16 AML; platelet counts < 50 x 10(9)/L, and leukocytosis > 50 x 10(9)/L. Patients were divided into low-risk (1-2 adverse factors; 8%), intermediate 1 (3 factors; 20%), intermediate 2 (4 factors; 38%), and high-risk groups (5-6 factors; 33%) with respective CR rates of 54%, 26%, 8%, and 0%. The respective 1-year survival rates were 36%, 21%, 6%, and 1%. A multivariate analysis for survival identified the following 7 independent adverse factors: first CR duration < 12 months; second CR duration < 6 months; bilirubin level > or = 1 mg/dL; albumin level < 3 g/dL; age > 60 years; bone marrow blasts > or = 50%; and year of therapy before 1991. Patients were divided into low-risk (0-2 adverse factors; 39%), intermediate (3 factors; 27%), and high-risk groups (> or = 4 factors; 34%) with estimated 1-year survival rates of 22%, 6%, and 0%, respectively. The respective CR rates were 26%, 8%, and 2%. CONCLUSIONS: The current analysis established the outcome and prognostic factors associated with second salvage therapy in AML. It also proposed risk models and groups that could be used for comparison of results of present and future investigational strategies.

Adolescent↗

HIV RNA and CD4 cell count response to protease inhibitor therapy in an urban AIDS clinic: response to both initial and salvage therapy.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the HIV RNA and CD4 cell response to both initial and salvage therapy with protease inhibitor-based therapy, and to examine the relationship between the virological response and pre-therapy characteristics. DESIGN: Observational cohort. SETTING: University-based public hospital AIDS clinic. PATIENTS: HIV-infected adults who received at least 16 continuous weeks' therapy with a potent protease inhibitor (indinavir, ritonavir or nelfinavir)-based regimen, and who have had at least 48 weeks of follow-up. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Plasma HIV RNA and CD4 cell count response at week 48 of therapy for patients receiving their first protease inhibitor-containing regimen, and at week 24 of therapy with a salvage regimen. RESULTS: Of the 337 patients analysed, 170 (50.2%) had a successful outcome (HIV RNA <500 copies/ml after 48 weeks of treatment). Independent predictors of virological failure were higher baseline HIV RNA level, lower baseline CD4 cell count and failure to initiate at least one new nucleoside analog simultaneously at the time protease inhibitor therapy was initiated. The risk of failure increased incrementally across most HIV RNA and CD4 cell strata, with significant increases as the HIV RNA increased above 4.5 log10 copies/ml and the CD4 cell count fell below 100 cells/mm3 (P< or =0.01). The CD4 cell count remained above baseline to week 48 in most patients, regardless of the HIV RNA response. Of the 99 patients who experienced virological failure and switched to a salvage regimen, only 22 (22%) achieved an undetectable HIV RNA level 24 weeks after initiating salvage therapy. Independent predictors of failure with salvage therapy included an HIV RNA greater than 4.0 log10 RNA copies/ml at the time of the switch and failure to use a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) in the salvage regimen. CONCLUSION: Failure of potent protease inhibitor therapy to suppress HIV RNA levels below detectable levels is common in clinical practice, and can often be explained by their suboptimal use. CD4 T cell counts remain above baseline for at least one year in most patients experiencing virological failure. Successful salvage therapy, which was uncommon, was associated with a low plasma HIV RNA at the time of the switch and the use of a new class of antiretroviral agents (NNRTI) in the salvage regimen.

Adult↗

Radiation therapy salvage of Hodgkin's disease following chemotherapy failure.

PURPOSE: This study evaluates the efficacy of comprehensive salvage radiation therapy, with or without chemotherapy, in selected patients with Hodgkin's disease who have failed primary combination chemotherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Between 1972 and 1991, 28 patients with advanced Hodgkin's disease failing intensive combination chemotherapy in previously unirradiated nodal and/or pulmonary sites were treated with salvage radiotherapy with curative intent. Treatment consisted of comprehensive extended field radiotherapy to all known areas of disease. Total radiation doses ranged from 17.0 to 50.0 Gy, with only five patients (18%) receiving < 30.0 Gy to any field. Twelve patients also received chemotherapy as part of their salvage regimen. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients (93%) achieved a complete response and 14 (50%) remain in continuous complete remission at 14 to 133 months. In addition, three patients (11%) who failed salvage radiotherapy are now without evidence of disease following additional therapy. With a median follow-up of 47 months (range 14+ to 198+), actuarial median relapse-free survival and overall survival are 46 and 97 months, respectively. Actuarial 5-year relapse-free survival and overall survival are 40% and 63%, respectively. Patients with an initial complete response to chemotherapy had a significantly longer actuarial relapse-free survival than those with an initial partial response (p = 0.02). Salvage therapy was generally well-tolerated and resulted in no treatment-related deaths. CONCLUSION: Comprehensive salvage radiotherapy is of significant benefit in selected patients and should be considered an option for patients with advanced Hodgkin's disease following chemotherapy failure.

Adolescent↗

Salvage therapy after two or more prior Helicobacter pylori treatment failures: the super salvage regimen.

BACKGROUND: Although effective therapies are available for curing Helicobacter pylori infection, the problem persists about what to do for patients who fail two or more treatment courses despite a good compliance. AIM: To test a twice a day midday quadruple therapy as salvage therapy. METHODS: Dyspeptic H. pylori-infected patients who failed two or more courses of anti-H. pylori therapy received omeprazole 20 mg, tetracycline 500 mg, metronidazole 500 mg, and bismuth subcitrate caplets 240 mg twice a day (with the midday and evening meals) for 14 days. H. pylori status was evaluated by 13C-urea breath test and histology 4-6 weeks after therapy. Eradication was defined as no positive test. RESULTS: Seventy-one patients were enrolled and 68 completed the full 14 days of therapy (mean age 46 years; 28 men). Thirty-three patients had failed prior treatment twice, 19 had failed three times, and 16 had failed four or more times. The cure rates were: intention to treat=93% (66/71); (95% CI=84% to 98%), per protocol=97% (66/68); (95% CI=89%- 100%). Success was excellent irrespective of diagnosis, age, prior treatment protocols, or smoking status. Moderate side-effects were experienced by only two patients. CONCLUSION: Midday bismuth subcitrate based twice a day quadruple therapy was an excellent salvage therapy. BID midday quadruple regimen should be considered as the therapy of choice.

Adult↗

Salvage therapy for patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma.

The non-Hodgkin's lymphomas represent a diverse group of lymphoproliferative disorders for which treatment must be specified according to the patient's status as well as the disease status. Although many advances have been made in the front-line treatment of non-Hodgkin's lymphomas, more than 50% of the patients will not be cured with their initial therapy. Because of these treatment failures with front-line therapy, many different salvage therapies have been tried in this patient population. In this article, we describe several conventional-dose, salvage chemotherapies and strategies for dose escalation and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in an attempt to overcome chemotherapy resistance.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗

Salvage therapy for locally recurrent prostate cancer after external beam radiotherapy.

The greatest obstacle in the cure of patients with locally recurrent prostate cancer after radiation therapy is the lack of early detection markers. The majority of patients who are candidates for local salvage therapy have locally advanced disease, precluding successful salvage therapy. A low pretreatment prostate specific antigen (PSA) has shown to be a favorable prognostic variable for disease progression, regardless of the specific local salvage therapy used. Of all the local salvage treatment options for these patients, we believe that salvage radical prostatectomy (RP) offers patients the greatest likelihood of a cure. The salvage RP results approach those achieved with standard RP for patients of similar pathologic stage. When patients are treated early in the course of recurrent disease (preoperative PSA < 10 ng/mL), an estimated two-thirds of patients will be disease-free 5 years after salvage RP alone. With better patient selection and continued technical modifications, the morbidity associated with salvage RP has substantially improved. Perioperative complications approach those observed with standard RP and approximately two-thirds of patients will recover urinary continence. Select patients may also recover functional erections when nerve-sparing techniques are used. Salvage cryotherapy and brachytherapy are minimally invasive alternatives to salvage RP. The cancer control results of these procedures appear to be inferior to results achieved with salvage RP. Each of these procedures is associated with significant morbidity and do not appear to provide a clear advantage over salvage RP in terms of posttreatment complications, urinary continence, and erectile function. A long-term cure is possible for patients with locally recurrent prostate cancer after radiation therapy. Local salvage therapy must be instituted early to be successful in the course of progressive disease.

Adult↗

Hodgkin's lymphoma in first relapse following chemotherapy or combined modality therapy: analysis of outcome and prognostic factors after conventional salvage therapy.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the prognosis of patients with Hodgkin's lymphoma (HL) who relapse following a complete remission (CR) achieved by chemotherapy with or without radiotherapy (CT+/-RT), and to identify prognostic factors for freedom from second progression (FF2P). METHODS: We analyzed the prognostic significance of the initial CT regimen (4 vs. 7-8 drugs), treatment-free interval (TFI), and demographic, clinical, and laboratory factors at the time of relapse and diagnosis, in 113 patients with HL, who relapsed after a CR achieved by CT+/-RT. RESULTS: Conventional salvage CT+/-RT was administered in 107 patients, while six received RT only. The 5-yr FF2P was 24%, while the 10-yr survival after relapse (O2S) was 39% and was not afffected by the initial CT regimen. Multivariate analysis revealed that extranodal disease at relapse (P<0.001), TFI<6 month (P<0.001), > or =5 involved sites at diagnosis (P=0.04) and anemia at relapse (P=0.03) were independent predictors of FF2P. 55% of patients had 0 or 1 of these adverse prognostic factors. The 5-yr FF2P of patients with 0, 1 or 2 adverse factors was 58%, 34% and 5% (P<0.0001). The corresponding rates for 10-yr O2S were 68%, 51% and 25%, respectively (P=0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Our data confirmed the significance of TFI and extranodal relapse and demonstrated a potential role for anemia at relapse and number of involved sites at diagnosis, for the prognosis of patients with HL relapsing after CT+/-RT. The combination of these prognostic factors defines a sizeable subgroup of patients with favorable outcome following conventional salvage therapy.

Adolescent↗

What are appropriate initial and salvage therapies for patients with thrombotic thrombocyopenic purpura (TTP)?

Although much has been learned about the pathophysiologic process of thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP), both diagnostically and therapeutically, since its initial description by Moschowitz in 1924, its etiology and treatments remain, in many instances, problematic. Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura remains a rare entity whose etiology is usually unknown, but several drugs and infections have now been implicated in its development. Although treatment by plasma exchange has gained worldwide acceptance, the optimal exchange media is not known, nor the volume and duration of exchange therapy, not appropriate salvage therapies. Without the benefit of randomized controlled trials, its treatment, to a large extent, remains not evidence-based but "eminence-based", making the same mistakes with increasing confidence over decades.

Humans↗