Search PubMed⌕ Search

SEARCH · Search PubMed

Results for “SPINAL FUSION”

Search indexed PubMed citations on genomics, clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health. Explore titles, authors and supplied subject terms, then open the PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 19 recordsLinked to original sources
PubMedDate not supplied

Use of electrical bone stimulation in spinal fusion.

Spinal fusion is commonly done to manage deformity, restore stability, and eliminate excessive motion at specific spinal levels. Pseudarthrosis limits the clinical success of spinal fusion. Three types of electrical stimulation, which is used to manage non-union in long bones, recently have been applied in an attempt to enhance the rate of spinal fusion. Direct current electrical stimulation is internal and thus eliminates dependence on patient compliance. Pulsed electromagnetic fields and capacitively coupled electrical stimulation are external techniques that require patient compliance but do not have the increased risk associated with implantable devices. Firm conclusions about efficacy are difficult to establish because of inconsistencies in both determining a reliable, reproducible end point for fusion and in incorporating the effect of patient parameters. Most data indicate a positive effect for use of direct current stimulation, but further studies are necessary to determine its appropriateness as an adjuvant to spinal fusion.

Animals↗
PubMed1989

Functional activities in spinal muscular atrophy patients after spinal fusion.

Spinal muscular atrophy patients present with weakness, greater in the proximal muscles, leading to scoliosis and limited upper extremity function. The purpose of this study is to identify unique aspects of these patients and to understand how spinal fusion affects their function. Forty patients underwent Harrington or Luque rod instrumentation with functional evaluations preoperatively and 2 and 5 years postoperatively. Biomechanical assessment of function is important. Flexibility of the spine is functionally advantageous because distal strength is used to align weaker proximal segments. Postoperatively, lack of spinal flexibility resulted in a decline in gross motor function and increased use of UE aids due to a change in the trunk position in the weaker patients. The stronger patients' activities were maintained. Earlier mobilization in patients with Luque procedures did not improve postoperative function.

Activities of Daily Living↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Effect of posterior spinal fusion on spinal balance in idiopathic scoliosis.

We analyzed the influence of posterior spinal fusion with Harrington rod instrumentation on spinal balance in 85 patients with primary thoracic curve patterns. Utilizing roentgenographic techniques of measurement, spinal decompensation was improved measurably in 64% of the patients, and lateral trunk shift improved in 82% of the patients with preoperative alterations of spinal balance.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1989

Spinal bone density following spinal fusion.

Spinal bone densities were assessed in 25 patients following lumbar fusion and bracing, in an attempt to study bone remodeling by noninvasive methods. Dual-photon densitometry was used to study specific areas of autologous bone grafts and adjacent vertebrae above the fusion mass. Measurements were made preoperatively and at 6-week intervals postoperatively. The data for the first 12 months postoperatively are reported here. In all patients there was at first a consistent loss in density in the vertebrae above the fusion mass, averaging 15.7%. This was followed by a gradual density increase such that by 1 year postoperatively, in 60% of the subjects, the density of these vertebrae was higher than the preoperative level. In the grafted areas, bone changes were cyclical, demonstrating a remodeling pattern consistent with that described in animal literature for graft healing and also consistent with modern bone remodeling theory. There was a general tendency toward a gradual increase in the density of the fusion mass.

Adult↗
PubMed1995

1995 Volvo Award in basic sciences. The use of an osteoinductive growth factor for lumbar spinal fusion. Part I: Biology of spinal fusion.

STUDY DESIGN: The histology of lumbar intertransverse process spinal fusion was studied in an experimental model in rabbits. OBJECTIVES: To qualitatively and quantitatively analyze the sequential histology of spinal fusion using a previously validated animal model. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Few previous studies have described the sequential histology during the posterolateral spinal fusion healing process using autogenous bone, and a basic understanding of the biology of this repair process is lacking. METHODS: Fourteen adult New Zealand white rabbits underwent single-level posterolateral lumbar intertransverse process arthrodesis with autogenous iliac bone graft. Animals were killed 1-10 weeks after surgery, and the fusion masses were analyzed histologically and quantitated using a semiautomated image analysis system. RESULTS: Three distinct phases of healing were identified (inflammatory, reparative, and remodeling) and occurred in sequence but in a delayed fashion in the central zone of the fusion mass compared with the outer transverse process zones. Membraneous bone formation, evident first at the ends of the fusion eminating from the decorticated transverse processes, was the predominant mechanism of healing. The central zone was somewhat different in that there was a period of endochondral bone formation during weeks 3 and 4 in this zone where cartilage formed and was converted to bone. Remodeling in the central zone had equilibrated with the transverse process zones by 10 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: Lumbar intertransverse process spinal fusion is a complex process from a spatial and temporal standpoint. When autogenous bone is used as the graft material, this process critically depends on a variety of factors from the decorticated host bone and exposed marrow. The persistence of a central cartilage zone may be related to some types of nonunions and deserves future investigation. This enhanced understanding of the biology of spinal fusion with autogenous bone graft will provide a foundation for optimizing the use of osteoinductive bone growth factors in this healing process.

Animals↗
PubMed1986

Long-term follow-up of spinal fusion in spinal muscular atrophy.

From 1966 to 1983, 11 females and eight males with spinal muscular atrophy were treated by arthrodesis. Seventeen of 19 patients were evaluated by follow-up physical examination, roentgenograms, and questionnaires. In order to compare long-term versus short-term results, changes in management, and factors contributing to morbidity and mortality, three groups were identified for study. Group I consisted of 11 patients operated between 1966 and 1983 and alive at follow-up evaluation. Group II consisted of five patients operated between 1980 and 1983. Group III consisted of three patients, all deceased at follow-up evaluation and operated before 1980. In Group I, the preoperative curve averaged 119 degrees and at final follow-up examination, 99 degrees. The average preoperative curve in Group II was 80 degrees and at follow-up examination, 49 degrees. Long-term follow-up vital capacities were obtained in nine patients. The average preoperative vital capacity was 1033 cm3, and the average vital capacity seven years postoperation was 860 cm3. Most patients reported improvement in sitting, balance, and comfort. All patients are wheelchair-bound, as they were before surgery. Few long-term respiratory problems were reported.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2002

The influence of lumbar lordosis on spinal fusion and functional outcome after posterolateral spinal fusion with and without pedicle screw instrumentation.

The aim of the current study was to examine the correlation between lumbar lordosis, spinal fusion, and functional outcome in patients suffering from severe low back pain, treated by posterolateral spinal fusion with or without pedicle screw instrumentation. One hundred thirty patients were randomly allocated to posterolateral lumbar fusion with or without Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation. Functional outcome was assessed preoperatively, and 1 and 2 years postoperatively. Lordosis angles of the lumbar spine and fusion rates were assessed at the 1- and 2-year follow-up. No difference in lordosis angle was found between the two groups at any time. Lordosis was unchanged at 2 years compared with preoperative status in both groups. In the instrumented group, nonunion (23%) was followed by a decrease in lordosis at follow-up (p < 0.05). However, in the noninstrumented group, nonunion (14%) resulted in increased lordosis (p < 0.05). No correlation was found between functional outcome and lordosis angle. The current study showed no correlation between functional outcome and lordosis angle either before or after posterolateral spinal fusion. Use of instrumentation did not influence lumbar spinal alignment compared with noninstrumented fusions. The sagittal alignment was stable both 1 and 2 years after solid fusion. The failure mode of instrumented fusions was a reduced degree of lordosis in contrast to an increased degree of lordosis in patients with noninstrumented fusion.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Direct current electrical stimulation increases the fusion rate of spinal fusion cages.

STUDY DESIGN: A randomized experimental evaluation of direct current stimulation in a validated animal model with an experimental control group, using blinded radiographic, biomechanical, histologic, and statistical measures. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy of the adjunctive use of direct current stimulation on the fusion rate and speed of healing of titanium interbody fusion cages packed with autograft in a sheep lumbar interbody fusion model. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Titanium lumbar interbody spinal fusion cages have been reported to be 90% effective for single-level lumbar interbody fusion. However, fusion rates are reported to be between 70% and 80% in patients with multilevel fusions or with risk factors such as obesity, tobacco use, or metabolic disorders. The authors hypothesized that direct current stimulation would increase the fusion rate of titanium interbody fusion cages packed with autograft in a sheep lumbar interbody fusion model. METHODS: Twenty-two sheep underwent lumbar discectomy and fusion at L4-L5 with an 11- x 20-mm Bagby and Kuslich (BAK) cage packed with autograft. Seven sheep received a BAK cage and no current. Seven sheep had a cage and a 40-microA current applied with a direct current stimulator. Eight sheep had a BAK cage and a 100-microA current applied. All sheep were killed 4 months after surgery. The efficacy of electrical stimulation in promoting interbody fusion was assessed by performing radiographic, biomechanical, and histologic analyses in a blinded fashion. RESULTS: The histologic fusion rate increased as the direct current dose increased from 0 microA to 40 microA to 100 microA (P < 0.009). Histologically, all animals in the 100-microA group had fusions in both the right and left sides of the cage. Direct current stimulation had a significant effect on increasing the stiffness of the treated motion segment in right lateral bending (P < 0.120), left lateral bending (P < 0.017), right axial rotation (P < 0.004), left axial rotation (P < 0.073), extension (P < 0.078), and flexion (P < 0.029) over nonstimulated levels. CONCLUSION: Direct current stimulation increased the histologic and biomechanical fusion rate and the speed of healing of lumbar interbody spinal fusion cages in an ovine model at 4 months.

Animals↗
PubMed1989

Rationale for spinal fusion in lumbar spinal stenosis.

In order to define the indications for spinal fusion in patients undergoing decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis, 114 patients surgically treated were reviewed. Follow-up was 24 to 108 months. Patients were grouped into four categories: 15 with lateral recess stenosis, 45 with central-mixed stenosis, 43 with stenosis following prior lumbar surgery(s), and 11 with scoliosis and spinal stenosis. Only two patients with lateral recess stenosis underwent fusion with fair results. Approximately one-third of those with central-mixed stenosis required a fusion. Results were good in 70%. In those with stenosis following prior lumbar surgeries, although not statistically significant, those who had concomitant decompression and arthrodesis had a better outcome than those in whom decompression only was done. Patients with scoliosis and stenosis had decompression for significant motor and reflex deficits and fusion over the length of their major curves. Patients having decompression for lumbar stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis, isolated disc resorption with degenerative facet joints, intervertebral disc disease with instability, and those with scoliosis with multidirectional instabilities benefit from concomitant spinal fusion.

Female↗
PubMed1994

Comparison of same-day sequential anterior and posterior spinal fusion with delayed two-stage anterior and posterior spinal fusion.

STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective review. Short-term outcomes were compared based on two different surgical techniques. OBJECTIVES: To determine the safety, efficacy, and cost effectiveness of two different surgical techniques of anterior and posterior spinal fusion for pediatric patients with spinal deformity. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Brown et al, Floman et al, and Bradford et al have reported on combined anterior and posterior spine fusions with a 1-2-week recovery period between stages. However, advances in surgical and anesthetic techniques combined with the prohibitive cost of prolonged hospitalization and theoretical advantages in pulmonary function and nutrition have led to increasing use of combined anterior and posterior spinal fusion under one anesthetic. METHODS: The authors reviewed records and radiographs of patients with pediatric spinal deformities who underwent anterior spine fusion/posterior spine fusion and instrumentation performed by the senior author (HAK) at one institution. RESULTS: Same-day sequential anterior spine fusion/posterior spine fusion resulted in less blood loss (575 +/- 275 ml; P < or = 0.0045), shorter hospital stay (8.00 +/- 2.68 days; P < or = 0.0001), and reduced hospital costs ($18,762 +/- $4,925; P < or = 0.0001). Operative time and complication rate were not affected. CONCLUSIONS: In selected patients with pediatric spinal deformity, experienced spinal surgeons can reduce blood loss, hospital stay, and costs by performing anterior and posterior spinal fusions sequentially under one anesthetic.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1997

The role of spinal fusion in surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis: a review.

The authors undertook a review of the literature and analysis of the local surgical experience for lumbar stenosis to define the role of simultaneous arthrodesis in the treatment of patients undergoing decompression for spinal stenosis. The restrained use of spinal fusion is recommended in spinal stenosis surgery because of the coexisting medical problems in the elderly patient population and the higher associated complication rate with spinal fusion and instrumentation. A spinal fusion is recommended when decompression is performed in an area of segmental instability as manifested by gross movement on flexion--extension radiographs; when the decompression coincides with an area of degenerative instability, as with scoliosis or spondylolisthesis; or when the decompression creates an iatrogenic instability by the disruption of the posterior elements. The use of spine instrumentation as an adjunct to fusion is recommended when an area of degenerative instability shows evident gross instability or has had additional destabilizing procedures, such as a discectomy or a facetectomy. Spinal fusion is not recommended for a routine decompressive laminectomy for lumbar stenosis or in the case of stable degenerative deformities. New fusion techniques may improve the outcome and decrease the morbidity associated with contemporary methods of spinal fusion and instrumentation.

Journal Article↗
PubMed1996

When is spinal fusion warranted in degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis?

This study, conducted by a group of neurosurgeons who devote a large portion of their professional time to the treatment of degenerative lumbar spine lesions, was prompted by the dramatic increase in the number of lumbar spinal fusion procedures performed over the last few years in a broad spectrum of disorders ranging from chronic incapacitating low back pain to lumbar spinal stenosis. In the authors' experience, lumbar spinal fusion is rarely warranted and often of dubious efficacy. To investigate this contradiction, the authors reviewed the medical literature on lumbar spinal fusion for the treatment of degenerative spinal stenosis. They have defined lumbar instability as objectively as possible, reviewed clinical and roentgenographic features, described spinal fusion techniques with the drawbacks of each, and evaluated outcomes of surgery for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis with or without fusion. Findings demonstrate that spinal fusion is a technique of unproven benefit that should be used only in carefully selected patients until results of reliable, prospective, comparative clinical trials become available. In the authors' opinion lumbar spinal fusion should be used as the first-line treatment only in young patients with clinical manifestations directly related to lumbar instability as defined in this study, when decompression requires removal of both facet joints and of the disk (which is rarely the case) or when simple decompression is followed by a recurrence of symptoms ascribable to worsening vertebral slippage.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Tri-calcium phosphate ceramics and allografts as bone substitutes for spinal fusion in idiopathic scoliosis as bone substitutes for spinal fusion in idiopathic scoliosis: comparative clinical results at four years.

The authors present the results of a comparative study of two series of posterolateral arthrodeses for scoliosis performed using COTREL DUBOUSSET instrumentation. Fifty-four consecutive patients underwent surgery for idiopathic scoliosis using the same technique. Thirty received a graft consisting of a mixture of corticocancellous autologous and allogenic bone frozen at -80 degrees, and 24 patients were grafted with a mixture of cortico-cancellous autologous bone and sticks of tricalcium phosphate (TCP, Biosorb, SBM, Lourdes, France). All patients were seen at three, six and twelve months, then once a year for at least four years with clinical and radiological evaluation at each visit. At the final follow up visit, no radiologic signs of pseudoarthrosis were found in either group with a minimum follow-up of 4 years. The appearance of bone callus was considered satisfactory at 6 months in all cases; moreover callus seemed to be more important in the TCP series, although this assessment was subjective. TCP resorption was total after 2 years, while allograft fragments were visible on x-rays after 2 years. Minor mechanical complications occurred but did not influence the results. Loss of correction was 8% of that initially obtained in the allograft group and 2% in the TCP group. Loss of correction did not progress after 6 months in the TCP group and after 2 years in the allograft group. Based upon this experience, the use of synthetic bone substitutes such as TCP would appear to be a valuable alternative to allografts in posterolateral spinal arthrodesis for idiopathic scoliosis, and it would eliminate the risk of viral contamination inherent to allograft implantation. To our knowledge, there have been no previous comparative studies concerning the use of tricalcium phosphate versus allograft in the literature.

Adolescent↗